phonetics: more applicaitons raung-fu chung southern taiwan university
DESCRIPTION
Noise frequencies: Languages[s] [][][][][][] English Polish Mandarin HakkaTRANSCRIPT
Fricatives: friction noises
a. 私 [s] b. 詩 [] c. 西 [i] d. she
Noise frequencies:
Languages [s] [] [] []
English 4000 2000
Polish 4000 2500 2000
Mandarin 4800 3100 2700
Hakka 5000 2000
Peaks of noises in LPC:
More on frictions:
Nasals:
Syllabic nasals: [m] [n] [ ]
Nasal + vowel: transition
Place reflected in transition:
Place matters:
Vowels + nasal= transition and place
Also place matters:
Nasalized vowels: nasal murmur
/ e // e /
Nasal murmur
Nasalized vowels and nasal murmur
Freanch:/ / and //
Southern Min nasal murmurs
SM: ne
Nasal murmur
Nasalized by degrees?
SM nasalized vs. oral vowels in chart
Now: What can we do with phonetics?
• 1. one language, different speakers• 2. across language:• Mandarin vs. English• Mandarin vs. Southern Min• English vs. other languages• Mandarin vs. other languages• 3. acoustic phonetic studies
Case 1: VOT in EFL
• Topic:• INTERLANGUAGE PRODUCTION OF
ENGLISH STOP CONSONANTS: A VOT ANALYSIS
Methodology:• Subjects:• 20 EFL students
– H EFL• 5 girls (the age of 13 to 16)• 5 boys (the age of 13 to 16)
• In the HEFL group, 9 subjects passed the basic of GEPT and the other passed Cave.
• 6 subjects came from the same public junior high school, 3 subjects came from Kaohsiung, and the other came from Yunlin.
– L EFL• 5 girls (the age of 15 to 16)• 5 boys (the age of 15 to 16)
• There is no one passing the GEPT. 9 subjects came from the same public high school in Yunlin County and the other came from a public vocational school in Yunlin County.
• 6 NSEs (Native speaker of American English)
– 3 females (the age of 19 to 24)– 3 males (the age of 19 to 24)
• 3 subjects came from Utah, 2 subjects came from Ohio, and 1 subject came from Washington D.C.
• They live in Taiwan for 5 months to 19 months, and the mean period is 9.4 months. They are missionaries. They speak Mandarin.
• Instruments: • Fill in a questionnaire
– About subjects linguistic and education background.
• Reading Lists– English list
• 27 words– Mandarin list
• 16 words– / ph, th, kh, p, t, k/ /i, u, a/
– Southern Min list• 24 words
– /ph, th, kh, p, t, k, b, g/ /i, u, a/
• Sound Record program– Computer
• Praat– The program written by Paul Boersma and David Weenink
• Data Analysis:• Get the VOT
– Fetching the syllables– Storing to a new “WAV” file– Measuring VOT by Praat
• Make Worksheets– Using Excel program
• mean values• standard deviations (SD)• graphical representation
• The VOT values– SPSS
• 1. ANOVA tests
Results:
1. VOT production by the NSE group– The VOT values average 12.3, 22.2, and 36.0 msec
for /p/, /t/, and /k/.– The VOT for /b, d, g/ and /p, t, k/ are similar.
2. VOT production in Mandarin by the EFL group– /p, t, k/ are short VOT value.– /p h, t h, k h / are long VOT value– /th/ is shorter than /ph/– HEFL group in /p, t, k/ have shorter VOT values
than LEFL group in Mandarin.
3. VOT production in Southern Min by EFL group– EFL, in Southern Min, are produced with short lag with
voiceless unaspirated.– Aspirated ones are produced with long lag.– There are less obvious between labial and alveolar stop in
Southern Min.– Fast speech rate may get lower VOT value.
4. EFL student’s VOT production in English– /b/ and /g/ with negative VOT values in English– In HEFL group, voiced and voiceless unaspirated with shorter
VOT values than LEFL.– Voiceless aspirated stops consistently with higher VOT values
by HEFL than LEFL.
Summary:
Implications?
Case study 2: Mandarin fricatives
A peak comparison: American English and American Chinese
Korean vs. Korean Chinese
Questions?