phase ia and ib (phase i) cultural resource...

Phase IA and IB (Phase I) Cultural Resource Investigations

for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project, Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York

NYSOPRHP Review # 15PR04512

Prepared For

CHA 441 South Salina St.

Syracuse, NY 13202-4712

October 12, 2015

By

Powers Archaeology, LLC

f/k/a Powers & Teremy, LLC 180 Avon Road

Rochester, NY 14625 Ph: (585) 266-4180

[email protected]

_____________________________________________________________________________________________© Powers Archaeology, LLC October 12, 2015 ii

REPORT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Powers Archaeology, LLC would like to thank Mr. Michael Conrad and Mr. James Trasher of the CHA for their efficient contract administration and helpful communications concerning the details of the project. Mr. Paul Powers coordinated the project and served as the field supervisor for the field inspection. Paul Powers, Kyle Somerville, and Matthew Bognaski conducted all Phase I fieldwork. Mr. Paul Powers and Dr. Kyle Somerville co-authored the Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations report.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________© Powers Archaeology, LLC October 12, 2015 iii

Table of Contents Title Page i Report Acknowledgements ii Table of Contents iii I. Phase I Management Summary 1 II. Phase I Project Information 3 III. Environmental Information 6

Soil Discussion/Disturbance 6 IV. Background Research 10 Site File Research 10 SRHP/NRHP Research and Previous Surveys 10 Prehistoric Sensitivity Assessment 11 Historic Sensitivity Assessment 11 V. Phase IB Field Investigations 14 Archaeological Survey Team/Date 14 Ground Conditions 14 Field Methodology 14 Problems Encountered 14 Shovel Test Results 14 VI. Testing Recommendations 17 VII. References Cited 18

List of Appendixes Appendix I. Project Maps Appendix II. Project Area Photographs Appendix III. Shovel Test Data

List of Figures 1. General Location of Project Area within New York State 4 2. Area of Potential Effect on the 1954 USGS 7.5’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle (Photorevised 1979) 5 3. Area of Potential Effcet on the 2015 NRCS Web Soil Survey 7 4. Area of Potential Effect on the 1881 F.W. Beers County Atlas of Chautauqua, New York 12 5. Area of Potential Effect on the 1900 USGS 15’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle 13

List of Tables 1. Summary of Soils Within the Area of Potential Effect 8 2. Sites Located Within a One-mile Radius of the Area of Potential Effect 10 3. Surveys Previously Conducted Within A One-Mile Radius of the APE 10 4. Summary of Surveys Previously Conducted Within a One-Mile Radius of the Area of Potential Effect 10 5. Layer I Soil Colors 15

6. Layer I Soil Matrices 15 7. Layer II Soil Colors 16 8. Layer II Soil Matrices 16

_____________________________________________________________________________________________© Powers Archaeology, LLC October 12, 2015 1

I. PHASE I MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

Project Name: Phase IA and IB (Phase I) Cultural Resource Investigations for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project, Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York. Project Description: The proposed project will involve the development of an approximate 37 acre / 15 hectare parcel that is located at 3799 Lake Shore Drive East in the Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York. Approximately 34 acres / 13.75 hectares of the 37 acres / 15 hectare parcel will be impacted by the proposed project and will be considered the Area of Potential Effect (APE). Project Location: The proposed project is located at 3799 Lake Shore Drive East, on the south side of Lake Shore Drive East, north of existing Conrail Railroad Tracks, within the town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York (042° 29’ 49.89”N, 079° 18’ 20.82”W). The project area can be accessed via Lake Shore Drive East. County: Chautauqua County Minor Civil Division Number: 01308 (Town of Dunkirk) USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map: 1954 USGS 7.5’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle (Photorevised 1979) SEQR Review: CHA has requested Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations as part of a State Environmental Quality Review (SEQRA). Involved State and Federal Agencies: NYSDEC Survey Area Acreage: 34 acres / 13.75 hectares Depth: Undetermined Number of Acres Surveyed: 34 acres / 13.75 hectares Archaeological Survey Overview Number & Interval of Shovel Tests: 314 50-ft / 15-m Number & Size of Units: NA Width of Plowed Strips: NA Surface Survey Transect Interval: NA Results of Archaeological Survey Number & Name of prehistoric sites identified: 0 Number & Name of historic sites identified: 0 Number & Name of sites recommended for Phase II/Avoidance: 0 Results of Architectural Survey Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries within project area (APE): 0 Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area (APE): 0 Closest Archaeological Site to the APE: 1341.000061; (3,321-ft / 1,012-m from the APE) Native American Burials Less Than ¼ Mile from APE: None SRHP/NRHP Historical Review Number of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0 Number of identified eligible building/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0


Recommendations of Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations: These Cultural Resource Investigations were performed only for the APE required for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project. Based upon these results, Powers Archaeology, LLC recommends no additional archaeological investigations. Report Authors: Paul Powers and Kyle Somerville Date of Report: October 12, 2015

Report Prepared By:

Mr. Paul Powers

Dr. Kyle Somerville


II. PHASE I PROJECT INFORMATION Powers Archaeology, LLC was contracted by the CHA to perform Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project. The proposed project will involve the development of an approximate 37 acre / 15 hectare parcel that is located at 3799 Lake Shore Drive East in the Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York. The project area can be accessed via Lake Shore Drive East. Approximately 34 acres / 13.75 hectares of the 37 acres / 15 hectare parcel will be impacted by the proposed project and will be considered the Area of Potential Effect (APE).


Gen

eral

Pro

ject

Loc

atio

n

Figu

re 1

. Gen

eral

Loc

atio

n of

Pro

ject

Are

a w

ithin

New

Yor

k St

ate


Figure 2. Area of Potential Effect on the 1954 USGS 7.5’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle (Photorevised 1979)

Area of Potential Effect


III. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Topography and Geology Chautauqua County is located on the Erie-Ohio Plain, and Allegheny Plateau physiographic provinces. The APE is located in the northwestern part of the county, within the Eire-Ohio Plain province. Elevations within Chautauqua County 20-ft AMSL along Lake Erie, with a maximum elevation of 2,190-AMSL on Gurnsey Hill in the southeast corner of the county (USDA 1987:3). Relief within the APE is moderate, ranging from 614-ft AMSL to 632-ft AMSL. The topography of this area is significant to the climate as a result of the rivers and stream valleys found in the hilly terrain and the occasional steep slopes within the area. During the Wisconsin glaciation of the Pleistocene epoch, ice blanketed the entire area of New York State. Glaciation had a noticeable effect on the surficial appearance of Chautauqua County. The rock formations beneath Chautauqua County are the source of the parent material for the soils. Soils Soils in Chautauqua County have developed since the last glacier retreated approximately 10,000 years ago. The recession of the sheets of ice carried eroded materials as they melted and traveled across New York State. The soils in Chautauqua County were formed through the interaction of climate, living organisms, parent materials, topography, and time. Differences among soils in the county are the result of differences in parent materials and topography, attributed to the variation in the amount of glacial till, outwash, delta deposits, alluvium, and organic materials that they may contain (USDA 1987: 167). Alluvial lands/soils are sections of nearly level, recent unconsolidated deposits on flood plains. The deposits are generally stratified and range in matrix texture from gravel to sand and clay. Drainage commonly encountered in alluvial soils is generally poor to very poor in nature. Colluvium consisting of soil and/or rock travels down slope by gravity. This “slope wash” may, in some cases bury an A Horizon, a culturally rich soil layer. There are two soil types found within the proposed project APE, from the Barcelona and Niagara soil series (Figure 3 and Table 1), and are somewhat poorly drained. The proposed APE for these cultural investigations does not contain alluvial or colluvial soils.


Figure 3. Area of Potential Effect on the 2015 NRCS Web Soil Survey

Area of Potential Effect


Table 1. Summary of Soils Within the Area of Potential Effect

KEY: Shade: Dk-Dark, Lt-Light, V-Very

Color: BGry-Brownish Gray, Blk-Black, Brn-Brown, GBrn-Grayish Brown, Gry-Gray, OBrn-Olive Brown, PBrn-Pale Brown, PGry-Pinkish Gray, RBrn-Reddish Brown, RGry-Reddish Gray, StrBrn-Strong Brown, RBrn-Red Brown, RGry- Reddish Gray, YBrn-Yellow Brown

Soils: Cl-Clay, Lo-Loam, Sa-Sand, Si-Silt

Other: Cbs-Cobbles, Ex-Extremely, F-Fine, Grl-Gravel, M-Mottled, Pbs-Pebbles, Rts-Roots, Str-Stratified

Disturbance Visual inspection of the area delineated as the APE for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project reveals areas no significant disturbance within the APE (Appendices I and II). Climate Chautauqua County generally experiences warm summers and long, cold winters. The climate of Chautauqua County is temperate continental. Yearly precipitation is about 39 inches. The annual precipitation for the county is evenly distributed throughout the growing season. The average relative humidity is 60%, with prevailing winds coming from the southwest (USDA 1987: 7). The rainfall is evenly distributed throughout the growing season. Lake Ontario and the Finger Lakes have an important effect on the temperature and wind currents of Chautauqua County. The lakes provides a classic moderating effect on the local temperatures, helping to cool in the summer and warm in the fall. Forest Zone When peoples first arrived in the western part of New York State, most of Chautauqua County was covered with forest dominated by sugar maple and red oak trees. Today the primary hardwoods found throughout the county are oak, birch, cherry, maple, apple, hawthorn, dogwood, and hickory. Domestic perennial grasses and herbaceous legumes are found within the open plains of the county (USDA 1987: 158). Presently, vegetation within the project area consists of heavy brush, wetlands, and secondary and tertiary forest. Drainage Drainage for the APE is provided by the numerous weltands and creeks which feed into Lake Erie, and the Lake Erie - St. Lawrence River system. These waters find their way to the Atlantic Ocean via the St. Lawrence River. There is substantial evidence of occasional ponding within the APE, as marsh, wetland and ponding are currently prevalent.

Soil Name Soil Horizon Depth cm (in) Soil Color Soil Texture

Inclusions Slope

Percent Drainage Landform

Barcleona silt loam

(BrA)

Ap 0-23 cm (0-9 in) BEg 23-38 cm (9-15 in) Bt 38-74 cm (15-29 in)

2BC 74-89 cm (29-35 in) 2C 89-129 cm (35-51 in)

3R 129+ cm (51+ in)

Dk GBrn GBrn Brn Brn Brn ---

Si Lo Si Lo

Si Cl Lo Si Lo Si Lo

Shale Bedrock

0-3 Somewhat poor Lake Plains

Niagara silt loam (NgA)

A 0-13 cm (0-5 in) E 13-36 cm (5-14 in)

Bt1 36-43 cm (14-17 in) Bt2 43-78 cm (17-31 in) C 78-182 cm (31-72 in)

Dk GBrn GBrn

Dk GBrn Dk GBrn Dk GBrn

Si Lo Si Lo Si Lo Si Lo Si Lo

0-3 Somewhat poor Lake Plains


Faunal Community The general environmental setting of the project area supports the typical array of animal species seen throughout Western New York. Earlier inhabitants of the western section of New York State would have been able to hunt black bear, white-tailed deer, elk, wild turkey, pheasants, pigeons, water fowl, beaver, raccoons, possum, otter, rabbit, squirrel, and gray fox, as sources of food, fur, and raw materials used in tool manufacturing, common amenities, and for trade. Lake Erie provided and continues to supple inhabitants with trout, pike, bass, salmon, smelt, and pickerel. Man-Made Features / Alterations There are no significant man-made features within the APE. Power lines are found adjacent to the northeast boundary, as well as a cell tower to the southwest, and railroad tracks to the south (Appendix II).


IV. BACKGROUND RESEARCH Site File Research A check of the NYS site files encompassing a one-mile radius from the APE was completed utilizing the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Cultural Resource Information System (NYSOPRHP CRIS). The site file check revealed the presence of one known sites within a 1-mile radius of the APE (Table 2). This site, Parker Village Site #61, was described as “Recent village sites of the Seneca” (Parker 1920:523). Unfortunately no additional information is available. No sites fall directly within the APE for the proposed project (www.cris.parks.ny.gov).

Table 2. Sites Located Within a One-Mile Radius of the APE

USN # Site Name Status Distance to APE m (ft)

1341.000061 PARKER VILLAGE SITE #61 Undetermined 1,012 (3,321) SRHP/NRHP Research and Previous Surveys According to the website for the National Register of Historic Places, and the NYSOPRHP CRIS website, there are five historic structures within a ½-mile radius of the proposed APE (www.cris.parks.ny.gov). These are summarized in Table 3:

Table 3. National Register Sites in the Vicinity of the Area of Potential Effect USN Site Name Status

1308.000015 3731 Middle Rd Not Eligible 1308.000016 3776 East Lake Rd Not Eligible 1308.000017 3778 East Lake Rd Undetermined 1341.000264 362 Lakeshore Dr East Not Eligible

1341.000299 Residential c.1960 – 24 N. Warsaw St Not Eligible

Powers Archaeology, LLC completed a search for previous archaeological and building surveys conducted within a one-mile radius of the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project. Information gathered from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP) office revealed that one archaeological survey and one building survey was previously completed within a one-mile radius of the project area. These are summarized in Table 4: Table 4. Summary of Surveys Previously Conducted Within a One-Mile Radius of the Area of Potential Effect

Number Report Title

06SR56517

Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation for the Nestle Purina Petcare Company Warehouse/Drop

Lot Expansion Project, 3800 Middle Road, Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York

15SR00423 Historic Architectural Resources Summary,

Arkwright Summit Wind Farm, Chautauqua County, New York


Prehistoric Sensitivity Assessment Based upon the location of a previously recorded prehistoric Native American site within a one-mile radius of the APE for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project, the proposed APE is considered by Powers Archaeology, LLC to have the potential of containing intact cultural deposits. The close proximity to permanent water sources, in conjunction with the previously documented site, indicates the potential for a prehistoric Native American presence surrounding the APE. Native American site types likely to be encountered within the proposed project area could range from small camps/resource procurement sites or “traces of occupation”, consisting of very diffuse surface scatters of lithic material, to larger habitation sites.

Historic Sensitivity Assessment Development within the general vicinity appears to reflect the more regional expansion. Project-specific historical development is based upon historic maps and atlases. There are no Map Documented Structures (MDS) within the APE. Therefore, historic material encountered within the APE would be found as the result of secondary disposition.


Not to Scale

Figure 4. Area of Potential Effect on the 1881 F.W. Beers County Atlas of Chautauqua, New York

N Area of Potential Effect


Not to Scale

Figure 5. Area of Potential Effect on the 1900 USGS 15’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle

N Area of Potential Effect


V. PHASE IB ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS Archaeological Survey Team/Date The Powers Archaeology, LLC archaeological field team consisted of Paul Powers, Kyle Somerville, and Matthew Bognaski. The Phase I testing was conducted in October 2015. Ground Conditions Physical conditions consist of wetland, marsh, as well as secondary and tertiary growth (Appendix II). Field Methodology A site visit included a visual examination of the project area to ascertain whether any sections showed evidence of prior disturbance, wetlands, or excessive slope. Based upon observed conditions, approximately 20 acres / 8 hectares (60%) of the 34 acre / 13.75 hectare APE were deemed testable using standard Phase IB testing methods. The remainder consisted of wetlands and marsh (Appendix I). The Phase IB field investigations strategy for this project consisted of shovel testing (Appendix I). Shovel test placement was determined using project maps provided to Powers Archaeology, LLC, research completed during Phase IA investigations, and conditions observed during the initial field inspection. Shovel test units were plotted at 50-ft / 15-m intervals. All excavations were carried out within the APE. Transects were oriented with a magnetic compass and paced out depending on the project area field conditions. Shovel tests were excavated by hand, and measured 1-ft x 1-ft / 30-cm x 30-cm. Each test was excavated to sterile subsoil or until evidence of disturbance was adequately documented to depths of at least 50-cm. All soils excavated were screened through ¼-inch metal mesh to recover any cultural material that may have been present. All soil types and textures were recorded in field notebooks. Documentation of existing conditions within the specific project area as well as that of general vicinity was accomplished through photography (Appendix II). Artifact Descriptions There were no artifacts recovered during these Phase I excavations. Problems Encountered Thick, almost impenetrable vegetation was found throughout the APE, making navigation difficult. Hand-held GPS units were utilized to insure proper placement of shovel tests. Shovel Test Results An estimated 60% of the 34 acre / 13.75 hectare APE was subjected to subsurface testing as part of these Phase I investigations. The remaining area consisted of wetland and marsh (Appendix I). Seventeen transects were placed within the APE containing a total of 314 shovel tests (Appendices I and III). While testing the proposed APE, 255 (81%) of the 314 shovel tests excavated reached a second layer, while none reached a third. The excavation of 59 (19%) shovel tests was halted due to filling with water, or having a layer I that exceeded 20 inches / 50 cmbs into sterile subsoil. (Appendix III). Soils encountered in the STPs were the expected as outlined as a typical profile by the Soil Survey of Chautauqua County (USDA 1987). No cultural material was recovered from any of the 314 shovel tests excavated.


Layer I Layer I averaged 11 inches / 28 cmbs, with a maximum depth of 25 inches / 64 cmbs recorded. Variations in soil color may be the result of a mixed A and B horizons or varying moisture levels within the soil. The following tables summarize soil color and consistency within Layer I (Tables 5 and 6). Table 5. Layer I Soil Colors

10YR 5/2 Grayish Brown 41.08% 10YR 4/2

Dark Grayish Brown 34.71%

10YR 4/3 Brown 14.01%

10YR 3/3 Dark Brown 9.87% 10YR 6/4

Light Yellowish Brown 0.32%

Table 6. Layer I Soil Matrices

Clay Loam 55.41%

Silt Loam 26.75%

Clay 14.33%

Silty Clay Loam 1.27%

Sandy Clay 0.96%

Sandy Clay Loam 0.64%

Silt 0.32%

Sandy Loam 0.32%


Layer II Layer II consisted of B horizon soils. Layer II was excavated to an average depth of 17 inches / 42 cmbs, with a maximum depth reached of 25 inches / 63 cmbs. The following tables summarize soil color and consistency within Layer II (Tables 7 and 8). Table 7. Layer II Soil Colors

10YR 6/4 Light Yellowish Brown 55.29%

10YR 5/4 Yellowish Brown 29.80%

10YR 4/4 Dark Yellowish Brown 10.59%

10YR 4/2 Dark Grayish Brown 1.57%

10YR 4/3 Brown 0.78%

7.5YR 6/4 Light Brown 0.78%

7.5YR 5/6 Strong Brown 0.78% 10YR 6/3 Pale Brown 0.39%

Table 8. Layer II Soil Matrices

Clay 64.71%

Clay Loam 18.43%

Silt 10.98%

Silt Loam 2.75%

Clayey Silt 1.96%

Sandy Clay Loam 1.18%


VI. TESTING RECOMMENDATIONS These Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations were performed only for the 34 acre / 13.75 hectares that were considered the Area of Potential Effect for the Proposed Little Apple Granny Smith Project. All work was conducted in the Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York. No cultural resources were identified. Consequently, Powers Archaeology, LLC believe that current development plans should be allowed to proceed, and that no further archaeological work is warranted.


REFERENCES CITED Printed Sources Parker C. Arthur (1920) The Archeological History of New York, Part 2, Archaeological Localities of the State of New York, University of the State of New York, NYSM United States Department of Agriculture (1987) Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Websites New York State Cultural Resource Information System (2015), https://cris.parks.ny.gov/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f NRCS Web Soil Survey (2015), http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Maps Beers, F.W. (1881), County Atlas of Chautauqua, New York. New York City: Walker and Jewett. United States Geological Survey 1954 7.5’ Auburn, N.Y. Quadrangle (Photorevised 1978). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1900 15’ Dunkirk, N.Y. Quadrangle. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Appendix I Project Map

Appendix II Project Area Photographs

Photograph 1. House # 3775, #3779, #3783 Lake Shore Drive East, adjacent to the APE, looking southwest.

Photograph 2. Lake Shore Drive East, adjacent to the APE, looking northeast.

Photograph 3. Lake Shore Drive East, adjacent to the APE, looking northeast.

Photograph 4. Lake Shore Drive East, adjacent to the APE, looking southwest.

Photograph 5. APE from Lake Shore Drive East, looking southeast.

Photograph 6. House # 3797 Lake Shore Drive East, adjacent to the APE, looking southeast.


Photograph 10. General project vicinity west of the APE, looking southeast.

Photograph 11. Lake Shore Drive East, looking west / southwest.

Photograph 12. General project vicinity northeast of the APE, looking southeast.

Photograph 13. Existing cell tower adjacent to the southwest corner of the APE, looking east / northeast.

Photograph 14. APE from the western boundary, looking north.

Photograph 15. APE and general project vicinity along western boundary, looking northwest.

Photograph 16. General project vicinity south of the APE, including Purina Plant, looking southeast.

Photograph 17. APE and existing wetland from western boundary, looking east / southeast.

Photograph 18. APE and existing wetland from western boundary, looking east / northeast.

Photograph 19. Existing gas well adjacent to the APE, looking north.

Photograph 20. APE, looking northwest.

Photograph 21. APE, looking north.

Photograph 22. APE, looking northeast.

Photograph 23. APE, looking northwest.

Photograph 24. General project vicinity northeast of the APE, looking northeast.

Photograph 25. Typical vegetation within APE, looking northwest.

Photograph 26. Typical vegetation within APE, looking north.

Photograph 27. Typical vegetation within APE, looking northwest.

Photograph 28. Typical vegetation within APE, looking south.

Appendix III Shovel Test Data

Trans Shovel Test Level

Depth Below

Surface (CM)

Soil Color Soil Matrix (Primary)

Soil Matrix (Secondary) Artifacts Recovered Comments

1 1 I 30 Grayish Brown Clay Loam Filled with Water






1 7 I 28 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 7 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 8 I 32 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 8 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 9 I 40 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 9 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 10 I 40 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 10 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 11 I 37 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 11 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 12 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 12 II 43 Yellowish Brown Clay1 13 I 30 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 13 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam


1 15 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 15 II 44 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay


1 17 I 30 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 17 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 18 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 18 II 58 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 19 I 38 Grayish Brown Clay Loam1 19 II 48 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 20 I 33 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam Rocks1 21 I 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam1 21 II 58 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam2 1 I 33 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 1 II 43 Yellowish Brown Silt Loam2 2 I 27 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 2 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Clay

2 3 I 16 Grayish Brown Silt Loam Filled with Water

2 4 I 33 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 4 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 5 I 19 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 5 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay



Page 1


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



2 8 I 31 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 8 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 9 I 19 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 9 II 29 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 10 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 10 II 43 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam2 11 I 36 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 11 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


2 13 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam2 13 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay2 14 I 39 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 14 II 52 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 15 I 29 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 15 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 16 I 21 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 16 II 48 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 17 I 36 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 17 II 46 Yellowish Brown Silt2 18 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam2 18 II 36 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay2 19 I 30 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam2 19 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam2 20 I 36 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 20 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 21 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam2 21 II 44 Light Yellowish Brown Clay2 23 I 58 Dark Grayish Brown Silt2 24 I 36 Grayish Brown Silt Loam2 24 II 46 Yellowish Brown Silt3 1 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 1 II 51 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


3 3 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 3 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 4 I 19 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 4 II 31 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 5 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 5 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 6 I 20 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 6 II 30 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 7 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 7 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 8 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 8 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


3 10 I 13 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 10 II 23 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 11 I 24 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 11 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay3 12 I 36 Grayish Brown Clay Loam3 12 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay

Page 2


Depth Below

Surface (CM)






3 20 I 30 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam Filled with Water

3 21 I 5 Dark Brown Sandy Loam Filled with Water

4 1 I 26 Brown Clay Loam4 1 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 2 I 20 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 2 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 3 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 3 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 4 I 27 Dark Grayish Brown Clay4 4 II 44 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay4 5 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Clay4 5 II 39 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay4 6 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 6 II 47 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay

4 7 I 25 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Filled with Water

4 8 I 26 Brown Clay4 8 II 40 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay4 9 I 39 Brown Clay Loam4 9 II 51 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay


4 11 I 37 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 11 II 51 Yellowish Brown Clay4 12 I 39 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 12 II 58 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 13 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 13 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 14 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 14 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 15 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 15 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 16 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 16 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 17 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam4 17 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay

4 18 I 17 Brown Clay Loam Filled with Water

4 19 I 50 Grayish Brown Silt Loam

Page 3


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



4 20 I 27 Dark Brown Silt Loam4 20 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 21 I 22 Dark Brown Silt Loam4 21 II 32 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 22 I 26 Grayish Brown Silt Loam4 22 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 23 I 25 Grayish Brown Silt Loam4 23 II 35 Light Yellowish Brown Clay4 24 I 23 Grayish Brown Silt Loam4 24 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Silt4 25 I 26 Grayish Brown Silt Loam4 25 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Silt5 1 I 22 Brown Clay Loam5 1 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 2 I 23 Brown Clay Loam5 2 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 3 I 28 Brown Clay Loam5 3 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 4 I 32 Brown Clay Loam Rocks5 5 I 24 Brown Clay Loam5 5 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 6 I 28 Brown Clay Loam5 6 II 52 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam5 7 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam5 7 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam5 8 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay5 8 II 45 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay


5 10 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam5 10 II 47 Yellowish Brown Clay5 11 I 27 Dark Grayish Brown Clay5 11 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clay5 12 I 26 Dark Grayish Brown Clay5 12 II 36 Yellowish Brown Clay5 13 I 22 Dark Grayish Brown Clay5 13 II 35 Yellowish Brown Clay5 14 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay5 14 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay5 15 I 27 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 15 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 16 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 16 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 17 I 40 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 17 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 18 I 33 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 18 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 19 I 23 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 19 II 33 Yellowish Brown Silt5 20 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam5 20 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay5 21 I 22 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 21 II 32 Yellowish Brown Silt5 22 I 30 Grayish Brown Silt Loam5 22 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay

Page 4


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



5 23 I 13 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam5 23 II 23 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay

5 24 I 5 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam Standing Water

5 25 I 17 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam5 25 II 31 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 2 I 19 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam6 2 II 30 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 3 I 17 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam6 3 II 27 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 4 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam6 4 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 5 I 16 Dark Grayish Brown Clay6 5 II 26 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 6 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam6 6 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 7 I 46 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam6 7 II 56 Light Yellowish Brown Clay



6 10 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay

6 10 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Filled with Water

6 11 I 15 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 11 II 25 Yellowish Brown Silt6 12 I 29 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 12 II 39 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 13 I 64 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 14 I 19 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 14 II 29 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 15 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 15 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 16 I 28 Dark Brown Silt Loam6 16 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Silt6 17 I 53 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 18 I 23 Dark Brown Silt Loam6 18 II 33 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 19 I 28 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 19 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


6 21 I 34 Grayish Brown Silt Loam6 21 II 44 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 22 I 20 Brown Clay Loam6 22 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay6 23 I 34 Dark Brown Silt Loam


6 24 I 22 Brown Clay Loam6 24 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clay6 25 I 37 Brown Silty Clay Loam6 25 II 48 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay7 1 I 32 Brown Clay Loam

Page 5


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



7 1 I 44 Dark Grayish Brown Clay7 1 II 47 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 1 II 54 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 2 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 2 II 41 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 3 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 3 II 49 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 4 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 4 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam7 5 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 5 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam7 6 I 32 Dark Grayish Brown Silty Clay Loam7 6 II 54 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam7 7 I 43 Brown Clay Loam7 7 II 57 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay7 8 I 47 Brown Clay7 8 II 57 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay

7 9 I 28 Brown Clay Filled with Water

7 10 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay7 10 II 49 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 12 I 41 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 12 II 54 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


7 14 I 39 Dark Grayish Brown Clay7 14 II 52 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay7 15 I 43 Dark Grayish Brown Clay7 15 II 51 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay7 16 I 33 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam7 16 II 47 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay7 17 I 24 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 17 II 34 Yellowish Brown Silt7 18 I 30 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 18 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Silt7 19 I 24 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 19 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Silt7 20 I 28 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 20 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay7 21 I 25 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 21 II 35 Light Yellowish Brown Silt7 22 I 18 Dark Brown Silt Loam7 22 II 41 Light Yellowish Brown Clay

7 23 I 10 Dark Brown Silt Loam Filled with Water

8 1 I 23 Dark Brown Silt Loam8 1 II 52 Light Yellowish Brown Silt8 2 I 29 Dark Brown Silt Loam8 2 II 39 Yellowish Brown Silt



8 4 I 23 Dark Brown Silt Loam8 4 II 33 Yellowish Brown Silt

Page 6


Depth Below

Surface (CM)




8 6 I 24 Dark Brown Silt Loam8 6 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay


8 8 I 50 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 9 I 18 Grayish Brown Silt Loam8 9 II 28 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 10 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 10 II 39 Brown Clayey Silt8 11 I 29 Brown Clay Loam8 11 II 52 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 12 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay8 12 II 47 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 13 I 22 Dark Grayish Brown Clay8 13 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 14 I 32 Dark Grayish Brown Clay8 14 II 45 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 15 I 33 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 15 II 49 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam8 16 I 30 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 16 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay8 17 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay8 17 II 47 Strong Brown Clay


8 19 I 24 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 19 II 36 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam8 20 I 28 Grayish Brown Silty Clay Loam8 20 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam8 21 I 47 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 21 II 63 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam8 22 I 45 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 22 II 57 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam8 23 I 39 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 23 II 52 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay8 24 I 27 Brown Clay Loam8 24 II 43 Yellowish Brown Clay8 25 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 25 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay8 26 I 34 Grayish Brown Clay Loam8 26 II 45 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay8 27 I 31 Brown Clay8 27 II 45 Yellowish Brown Clay9 1 I 29 Brown Clay9 1 II 46 Yellowish Brown Clay9 2 I 33 Brown Clay9 2 II 47 Yellowish Brown Clay9 3 I 25 Brown Clay9 3 II 35 Yellowish Brown Clay9 4 I 31 Brown Clay9 4 II 42 Yellowish Brown Clay9 5 I 28 Brown Clay9 5 II 44 Yellowish Brown Clay

Page 7


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



9 6 I 24 Grayish Brown Clay9 6 II 34 Light Yellowish Brown Clay9 7 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 7 II 42 Yellowish Brown Clay9 8 I 25 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 8 II 35 Yellowish Brown Clay9 9 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 9 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clay



9 12 I 29 Grayish Brown Silt Loam9 12 II 39 Light Yellowish Brown Silt9 13 I 39 Grayish Brown Silt Loam9 13 II 49 Yellowish Brown Silt9 14 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 14 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay9 15 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam9 15 II 34 Yellowish Brown Silt9 16 I 30 Brown Clay9 16 II 40 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 17 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay9 17 II 45 Yellowish Brown Clay9 18 I 32 Brown Clay9 18 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 18 II 42 Yellowish Brown Clay9 18 II 36 Light Yellowish Brown Clay9 19 I 29 Grayish Brown Clay9 19 II 42 Yellowish Brown Clay9 20 I 29 Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 20 II 39 Yellowish Brown Clayey Silt9 21 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 21 II 45 Dark Yellowish Brown Clayey Silt9 22 I 28 Brown Clay Loam9 22 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay9 23 I 30 Grayish Brown Clay Loam9 23 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clayey Silt9 24 I 18 Brown Clay Loam9 24 II 28 Light Yellowish Brown Clay9 25 I 26 Grayish Brown Clay9 25 II 37 Strong Brown Clay




10 1 I 62 Dark Grayish Brown Clay10 2 I 23 Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 2 II 41 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 3 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 3 II 52 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 4 I 28 Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 4 II 38 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam

Page 8


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



10 5 I 30 Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 5 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 6 I 34 Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 6 II 49 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 7 I 37 Dark Brown Clay Loam10 7 II 46 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam

10 8 I 11 Dark Brown Clay Loam Filled with Water

10 9 I 35 Dark Brown Clay Loam10 9 II 51 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 10 I 39 Dark Brown Clay Loam10 10 II 55 Yellowish Brown Clay10 11 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 11 II 43 Yellowish Brown Clay10 12 I 34 Brown Clay Loam10 12 II 48 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 13 I 33 Brown Clay Loam10 13 II 47 Yellowish Brown Clay10 14 I 36 Brown Clay10 14 II 46 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam10 15 I 31 Brown Clay Loam10 15 II 42 Yellowish Brown Clay10 16 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam10 16 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay10 17 I 26 Brown Clay Loam10 17 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clay10 18 I 18 Grayish Brown Silt Loam10 18 II 28 Light Yellowish Brown Silt10 19 I 25 Grayish Brown Silt Loam10 19 II 35 Light Yellowish Brown Silt10 20 I 30 Grayish Brown Silt Loam10 20 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Silt10 21 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam10 21 II 34 Yellowish Brown Silt10 22 I 21 Grayish Brown Clay Loam



11 1 I 31 Grayish Brown Silt Loam11 1 II 45 Dark Grayish Brown Silt11 2 I 23 Grayish Brown Silt Loam11 2 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Silt11 3 I 29 Grayish Brown Silt Loam11 3 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Silt11 4 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Clay11 4 II 48 Light Yellowish Brown Clay11 5 I 21 Dark Grayish Brown Clay11 5 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay11 6 I 36 Dark Grayish Brown Clay11 6 II 47 Yellowish Brown Clay


11 8 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam11 8 II 39 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam

Page 9


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



11 9 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam11 9 II 52 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam11 10 I 31 Brown Clay Loam Rocks11 11 I 27 Brown Clay Loam11 11 II 37 Light Yellowish Brown Clay11 12 I 29 Brown Clay Loam11 12 II 39 Light Brown Silt11 13 I 29 Brown Clay Loam11 13 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam11 14 I 32 Grayish Brown Clay Loam11 14 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam11 15 I 35 Brown Clay Loam11 15 II 46 Light Yellowish Brown Clay11 16 I 27 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam11 16 II 39 Light Yellowish Brown Clay11 17 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam11 17 II 40 Light Brown Clay12 1 I 33 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 1 II 49 Light Yellowish Brown Clay12 2 I 48 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 2 II 63 Yellowish Brown Clay12 3 I 43 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 3 II 55 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 4 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 4 II 52 Yellowish Brown Clay12 5 I 27 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 5 II 40 Yellowish Brown Clay12 6 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 6 II 43 Yellowish Brown Clay12 7 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay12 7 II 58 Yellowish Brown Clay12 8 I 31 Dark Brown Clay Loam12 8 II 48 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 9 I 28 Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 9 II 38 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 10 I 29 Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 10 II 42 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 11 I 32 Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 11 II 45 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 12 I 38 Grayish Brown Clay Loam12 12 II 51 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay Loam12 13 I 30 Dark Grayish Brown Clay12 13 II 42 Pale Brown Clay12 14 I 53 Dark Grayish Brown Clay



13 1 I 17 Grayish Brown Silt Loam13 1 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clayey Silt13 2 I 16 Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 2 II 29 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 3 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 3 II 46 Yellowish Brown Clay13 4 I 28 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam

Page 10


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



13 4 II 48 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 5 I 25 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 5 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 6 I 22 Brown Clay Loam13 6 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 7 I 25 Brown Clay Loam13 7 II 56 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 8 I 23 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam13 8 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 9 I 37 Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 9 II 50 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 10 I 24 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 10 II 34 Yellowish Brown Clay13 11 I 33 Dark Brown Clay Loam13 11 II 53 Yellowish Brown Clay13 12 I 26 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 12 II 40 Light Yellowish Brown Clay13 13 I 34 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 13 II 51 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam13 14 I 37 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam13 14 II 47 Yellowish Brown Clay13 15 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam

13 15 I 23 Brown Clay Loam Filled with Water

13 15 II 41 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam14 1 I 16 Grayish Brown Clay Loam14 1 II 26 Yellowish Brown Silt14 2 I 31 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam14 2 II 44 Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 3 I 22 Grayish Brown Clay Loam14 3 II 53 Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 4 I 26 Dark Brown Clay Loam14 4 II 58 Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 5 I 34 Dark Brown Clay Loam14 5 II 49 Light Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 6 I 25 Grayish Brown Silt Loam Rocks14 7 I 24 Grayish Brown Silt Loam14 7 II 61 Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 8 I 54 Grayish Brown Clay Loam14 9 I 26 Grayish Brown Silt Loam14 9 II 42 Light Yellowish Brown Silt Loam14 10 I 21 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam14 10 II 50 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay14 11 I 29 Dark Grayish Brown Sandy Clay14 11 II 53 Light Yellowish Brown Clay15 1 I 51 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam15 2 I 22 Dark Brown Sandy Clay15 2 II 32 Yellowish Brown Sandy Clay Loam15 3 I 14 Grayish Brown Clay Loam15 3 II 24 Dark Grayish Brown Sandy Clay Loam15 4 I 9 Grayish Brown Sandy Clay15 4 II 19 Dark Grayish Brown Sandy Clay Loam

15 5 I 12 Grayish Brown Sandy Clay Loam Filled with Water

Page 11


Depth Below

Surface (CM)



16 1 I 8 Grayish Brown Sandy Clay Loam Filled with Water

16 1 I 24 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam16 1 II 43 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam16 2 I 43 Dark Brown Silt Loam16 2 II 58 Yellowish Brown Silt16 3 I 35 Dark Grayish Brown Silty Clay Loam16 3 II 48 Yellowish Brown Clay Loam16 4 I 18 Dark Grayish Brown Clay Loam16 4 II 30 Dark Yellowish Brown Clay17 1 I 18 Dark Grayish Brown Silt Loam17 1 II 35 Light Yellowish Brown Clay Loam17 2 I 13 Dark Brown Clay Loam17 2 II 37 Brown Clay

Page 12

Sincerely,

Ruth L. Pierpont

Deputy Commissioner for Historic Preservation

Based upon this review, it is the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation’s opinion that your project will have no impact on archaeological and/or historic resources listed in or eligible for the New York State and National Registers of Historic Places.

If further correspondence is required regarding this project, please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above.

Re:

Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the project in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (Section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the OPRHP and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review of the project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8) and its implementing regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617).

October 19, 2015

Mr. Paul PowersPowers Archaeology LLC180 Avon RoadRochester, NY 14625

DECLittle Apple Granny Smith Project3799 Lake Shore Drive ETown of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, NY15PR04512

Dear Mr. Powers:

Division for Historic PreservationP.O. Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 • (518) 237-8643 • www.nysparks.com

ANDREW M. CUOMOGovernor

ROSE HARVEYCommissioner

March 31, 2017 Mr. John Bonafide, Director Technical Preservation Bureau New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) New York State Historic Preservation Office Peebles Island Resource Center P.O. Box 189 Waterford, NY 12188-0189 Re: Proposed Athenex Project

377 Lake Shore Drive E. Dunkirk, Chautauqua County, New York OPRHP Reference No. 15PR04512

Dear Mr. Bonafide:

The New York State Urban Development Corporation, d/b/a Empire State Development (“ESD”), is proposing to provide economic development assistance to Athenex, a global biopharmaceutical company, toward that company’s development of a new pharmaceutical manufacturing facility to be built on a ~34-acre site at 3799 Lake Shore Drive E (NYS Route 5) in the Town of Dunkirk, NY (the “Project”). The Project would include the construction of a two-story, 40-foot-high structure with approximately 320,000 square feet of useable space for central utilities, manufacturing, warehouse, laboratories and office spaces, which would be built along with employee parking areas and other site improvements.

The ESD funds proposed for the Project are being administered through the Governor’s “Buffalo Billion” Economic Development Initiative. In 2015, the Project was in the midst of alternative site evaluation and due diligence activities, administered by the State University of New York Polytechnic Institute (SUNY Poly), and at that time was referred to as the “Little Apple Granny Smith” project (OPRHP Reference No. 15PR04512).

After OPRHP indicated that the Project site is within an archeologically sensitive area and recommended a Phase 1 Cultural Resource Investigation, Phase 1A documentary research and Phase 1B field investigation was completed by Powers Archeology, LLC and submitted to OPRHP. In a letter dated October 19, 2015, OPRHP indicated that the Project will have no impact on archeological and/or historic resources listed in or eligible for the State and National Registers of Historic Places. All aspects of the proposed Project (e.g., Area of Potential Effect, site plan, etc.) remain the same as that evaluated in 2015.

Mr. John Bonafide March 31, 2017

Page 2

Therefore, based upon these past investigations and OPRHP’s prior findings, ESD has made a preliminary conclusion that the proposed Athenex Project would not adversely impact any property on or eligible for inclusion on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Pursuant to our obligations under Section 14.09 of the New York State Historic Preservation Act, ESD would appreciate OPRHP’s review and any comments regarding our agency’s interpretations with regard to this property.

Please let me know if there is any additional information you require to conduct this review.

Sincerely, EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT

Paul J. Tronolone, AICP Vice President – Policy, Planning, & Project Development cc: Rachel Shatz, ESD APO

Nancy Herter, OPRHP

ANDREW M. CUOMO ROSE HARVEYGovernor Commissioner

____________________________________________________________________________Division for Historic Preservation

P.O Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 • (518) 237-8643 • www.nysparks.com

April 3, 2017

Paul J. Tronolone, AICPVice President-Policy, Planning & Project DevelopmentEmpire State Development95 Perry Street, Suite 500Buffalo, NY 14203

Re: ESDAthenex Project/Formerly Little Apple Granny Smith Project3799 Lake Shore Drive E, Town of Dunkirk, Chautauqua County15PR04512

Dear Mr. Tronolone:

Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and HistoricPreservation (OPRHP) for the revisions to this project. We continue to review the undertakingin accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (Section 14.09 of theNew York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of theOPRHP and relate only to Historic/ Cultural resources.

Based upon this review, it is the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and HistoricPreservation’s opinion that the revised project at this location will continue to have no impact onarchaeological and/or historical resources listed in or eligible for the New York State andNational Registers of Historic Places.

If I can be of any further assistance I can be reached at (518) 268-2166.

Sincerely,

John A. BonafideDirector,Technical Preservation Services BureauAgency Historic Preservation Officer

phase ia and ib (phase i) cultural resource...

Documents