phase i field activities data summary report for …3-6 3-7 4-1 5-1 title phase i field activities...

I| REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY

(RI/FS)

I

• Data Summary Report

- Phase I Field Activities

-IM OKLAHOMA REFINING COMPANY (ORC)

SUPERFUND SITE

-I Cyril, Oklahoma

I

• Prepared for

Oklahoma State Department of HealthSuperfund Section

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Contract No. 60716

Bechtel Environmental, Inc. February 1991Houston, Texas

959655

III

1

I

IIII

SUMMARY OF PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NUMBER

.1 Table of Contents i

8Appendices i

List of Figures ii

• List of Tables ii

• Glossary iii

• List of Revisions iv

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

• 2.0 GEOLOGY 2-1

3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES 3-1

B 3.1 Introduction 3-1

3.2 Detected Compounds 3-1

• 3.3 Background 3-2

3.4 Waste Sources 3-2

g 3.5 Groundwater 3-12

3.6 Surface Water and Sediment 3-21

K 3.7 Surface Soil 3-23

3.8 Subsurface Soil 3-26

4.0 GROUNDWATER 4-1

5.0 QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE 5-1

APPENDICES .

• APPENDIX A GEOLOGIC LOGS

APPENDIX B MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORTS

ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I i February 1, 1991

FIGURE NUMBER

SUM 3-1

SUM 3-2

SUM 3-2A

SUM 3-2B

SUM 3-3

SUM 3-4

SUM 4-1

List of Figures

TITLE

SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR WASTE SOURCES

SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR GROUNDWATER

BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION

AREAS OF FREE HYDROCARBON PRODUCT

SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR SURFACE WATER ANDSEDIMENTS

SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR SURFACE SOIL

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS

List of Tables

IIIII

TABLE NUMBER

1-1

3-1

3-2

3-3

3-4

3-5

3-6

3-7

4-1

5-1

TITLE

PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES

SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIA

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSBACKGROUND SAMPLES

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSMAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS - WASTE SOURCES

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSGROUNDWATER

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE WATER & SEDIMENTS - GLADYSCREEK/ TRIBUTARY/ ACID & CAUSTIC SEEP

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE SOILS

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSUBSURFACE SOILS

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS

ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I ii

Revision 0October 1990

I• GLOSSARY

• BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene

EP TOX Extraction Procedure Toxicity (analysis)

| GC/MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (analysis)

— MCL Maximum Contaminant Level as per the Safe Drinking• Water Act

O/HS Organic/Hydrocarbon Scan (analysis)

I PPM Parts Per Million

1

I

I

I

I

II

I

I

I

I ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PH\SE I iii October 1990

I

LIST OF REVISIONS

DATE REVISION NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF REVISION

10/90

11/90

02/91

0

0

1

Draft Issue

Report Issue

Table of ContentsPages 3-3, 3-5, 3-7, 4-1All Data Summary Tables

ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I iv

Revision 1February 1, 1991

[11.1llllIllll1 11 1llllII

I

•l

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Phase I summary report was prepared as part of the RemedialInvestigation /Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and Risk Assessment forthe Oklahoma Refining Company (ORC) Superfund Site. It wasprepared for the Superfund Program of the Oklahoma StateDepartment of Health (OSDH) and Region VI of the EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA). This study was conducted by BechtelEnvironmental, Inc. (Bechtel) and OSDH. Bechtel prepared allproject plans which included the Work Plan, Field OperationsPlan, Quality Assurance Project Plan, and the Site Health andSafety Plan. OSDH personnel performed most of the samplingactivities during the field investigation and sample analysesreported in this Phase I summary report.

This document summarizes the Phase I field activities performedfor the RI/FS. The emphasis of this report is on the results ofthe analyses performed on the samples obtained during the fieldactivities. .Data obtained on the physical character of the RushSprings aquifer is also briefly discussed. The data presentedin this report was used to develop the Field Operations Plan forPhase II field activities. A list of the major tasks performedduring the Phase I field activities is presented in Table 1-1.

ORC Superfund Site S Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 1-1 October 1990

i

TABLE 1-1

PHASE I FIELD ACTIVITIES

DESCRIPTION QUANTITY

MONITORING WELLS CONSTRUCTED

^SHALLOW WELLS 17

INTERMEDIATE WELLS 4

MONITORING WELL AND BORING EVALUATION

EXISTING WELLS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 50

EXISTING WELLS VIDEO LOGGED . 6

NEW WELLS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 20

DEEP BORINGS GEOPHYSICALLY LOGGED 1

BORINGS

SHALLOW WASTE SOURCE BORINGS 25

DEEP BORINGS 1

SAMPLES COLLECTED

WASTE SOURCES

SURFACE WATER 13

SEDIMENT 66

SUBSOIL 29

GROUNDWATER

SHALLOW (Includes 2 product samples) ... 19.,

INTERMEDIATE 7 * •—•

SEDIMENT AND SURFACE WATER 25

SURFACE SOILS 21

SUBSOIL (MONITORING WELLS) 45

* Three of these samples were collected in three intermediatedepth wells that existed onsite before Phase I work began.These wells are identified as Mystery wells (MW). .

ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I October 1990

1IIII

IIII

II

2.0 GEOLOGY

Cyril, Oklahoma, is situated in the Western Sandhill Region ofsouthwestern Oklahoma. This region is in the Osage Plain of theCentral Lowland Physiographic Province. The Site overlies the axisof a major structural basin named the Anadarko syncline. Theregion is bounded to the north by the Central Kansas Uplift, to thesouthwest by the Amarillo-Wichita Mountains, to the east by theNemaha Ridge, and to the west by the Cimmaron Uplift-Keys Domestructure.

The local geology includes deposits of Quaternary and Permian age.Surface soils are composed of silty and sandy loam soils and gypsumoutcrops. Strata outcroppings of Permian age deposits at ORCinclude the basal Weatherford Member of the Cloud Chief Formationand the underlying Rush Springs Sandstone.

Alluvial soils, primarily silty clay, cover most of the site withthicknesses ranging from 0 to approximately 30 feet. Along GladysCreek 50 feet of canyon-filling alluvium was encountered. Thisalluvium consisted of clay, organic-rich clay, and a few thinlayers of silty sand.

At the ORC Site, the Weatherford Member outcrop is the result oferosion of most of the Cloud Chief Formation. Discontinuouserosional remnants were observed at the site with a maximumthickness of 31.5 feet. The Weatherford Member is primarily gypsumwith intervening shales and siltstones that identify thetransitional zone between the Cloud Chief Formation and RushSprings Sandstone. These intervening layers were not observed inborings drilled during Phase I field activities.

The Rush Springs Sandstone is a red to brown, very fine grained,silty sandstone. The Rush Springs outcrops along Gladys Creek andits tributary and serves as the principal aquifer in the area.Underlying the Rush Springs Sandstone in descending order are theMarlow Formation, Dog Creek Shale, Blaine Formation, FlowerpotShale and the Duncan Sandstone. The deepest Formation penetrated

ORC Superfund Site - Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 2-1 October 1990

3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES

3.1 INTRODUCTION

This section presents a general discussion of the resultsof the laboratory analyses performed on the samples obtainedduring the Phase I field activities. The discussion isdivided into the following five sections:

• BACKGROUND SAMPLES

• WASTE SOURCES

• GROUNDWATER

• SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENTS

• SURFACE SOIL

• SUBSURFACE SOIL

These discussions are for informational purposes only. Onlybrief interpretational comments with regard to extent ofcontamination, contaminant fate and transport, and potentialhealth risks are made. Additional discussion will beincluded in the RI report.

3.2 DETECTED COMPOUNDS*

A summary of all compounds detected during the Phase I- fieldinvestigation and the associated geomedia is shown onTable 3-1.

ORC Superfund Site * Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-1 October 1990

SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIA

DETECTED COMPOUNDSINORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTSarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopper .- , .leadmercurynickelzinc

SEDIMENT OROONDWATER SURFACE WATER SURFACE SOIL SUBSOIL

11ItItItItItItI

1.1ItItItIItI

Note: Wast* tamplM «r» categorized under Mdimcnl umplw.

TABLE 3-1 PAGE1

SUMMARY OF DETECTS/GEOMEDIADETECTED COMPOUNDSORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS1,1,1-trichloroethane1 ,1 -dichtoroethylene1 ,2-dichloroethane1 ,2-<fichloropropane2,4,5- trichlorophenol2,4-dimethyl phenol2-chtorophenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacenaphtheneacetone totalanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthracene>enzo(a)pyrenebenzo(b)fiuranthenebenzo(8,h,i)perylenebenzo(k)fluoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatebutyl benzyl phthalatecarbon disulfidechlordanechlorobenzenechloroformdirysenedibenzoturandibenzo(ah)anthracenediethylphthalatedi-n-butylphthlate

di-n-octylphthalateethylbenzenefluorantneneluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethylisobutylketonenaphthalenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenesec butylbenzenestyrene

toluenetrichloroethytenet-butyl benzenexylene

SEDIMENT

•

•

OROUNDWATER

«

| •

•

; •

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

*

•

•

*

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

SURFACE WATER

•

•

•

•

•

>•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

*

•

•'

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

SURFACE SOIL

•

*

•

*

•

•

*

•

•

•

•

•

*

•

•

•

*

•

•

•

•

•

•

*

SUBSOIL

•

•

•

•

••

•

••

•

••

".. ••

•

•

•

Note: Wart» Mmp4»» «r» ealagorizad under Mdinonl ennplM.

TABLE 3-1 PAGE 2

IIIIt1II1I1IIIIII

3.3 BACKGROUND SAMPLES

Background data, which represent the naturally occurringgeomedia chemistry, obtained during the Phase I fieldinvestigation are summarized on Table 3-2. This data,although limited, was used for the preliminary data reviewand evaluation process. Additional background data will beobtained during the Phase II field investigation to completethe data evaluation.

Upgradient data, which represent groundwater chemistry priorto groundwater migration onto the site, are summarized inTable 3-2.

3.4 WASTE SOURCES

Sampling of waste sources included surface water, sedimentsand subsoil. Sampling locations for each media are shownon Figure SUM 3-1. A summary of "hits" for all wastesources is included in Table 3-3.

Land Treatment Area

No surface water was in this area.

Metals - Elevated concentrations for arsenic (20 PPM), lead(460 PPM) , chromium (444 PPM) and barium (305 PPM)were detected in the upper 2 feet of soil. EP Tox forlead was < 1 PPM.

rt

GC/MS & 0/HS - No traces of hydrocarbons was detected insoil. Traces of hydrocarbon were detected ingroundwater beneath the land treatment area.

ORC Superfund Site Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-2 October 1990

I

TABLE 3-2

BACKGROUND SAMPLES

SURFACE WATER

OSDH SAMPLE NO.

38/40

LOCATION

SEDIMENTS 41

SURFACE SOILS 124

SUBSURFACE SOILS 36,37

UPGRADIENTGROUNDWATER 259

DRAINAGE DITCH/GLADYSCREEK

GLADYS CREEK

NORTH OF HIGHWAY 277

SBB-3

SBB-3

NOTE: See Figures SUM 3-2, SUM 3-3, AND SUM 3-4 for sample locations.

ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I


II1ItI

Iil

II

II1tI

Oil Skinwer Ponds

Metals - Surface water samples were at or below backgroundlevels for all metals except zinc which was 0.145 PPM.Elevated concentrations for arsenic (107 PPM), chromium(530 PPM), and lead (1,313 PPM) were detected in thewaste sediment samples. EP Tox for lead in the wastesamples (6.0 PPM) exceeded the toxic characteristiclevel of 5.0 PPM. The highest concentration for lead(3,725 PPM) was detected in the subsoils and chromium(530 PPM) was highest in the waste. In subsoils, EPTox for chromium was below the toxic characteristiclimit (5 PPM) and EP Tox was exceeded for lead(21.6 PPM).

GC/MS & O/HS - Surface water samples indicated noconcentrations for organics above laboratory detectionlimits. Elevated concentrations for PAHs in the wastesediments include pyrene (19 PPM), phenanthrene(37 PPM) , 2-methylnaphthalene (43 PPM) , and naphthalene(11 PPM). Subsoil samples indicated higherconcentrations for PAHs. Those were pyrene (30 PPM),phenanthrene (55 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (180 PPM),and naphthalene (29 PPM). Hydrocarbons were in lowconcentrations for waste sediments and subsoil.

Pump Pits

No surface water was at this location.

Metals - Elevated concentrations for lead (107 PPM) andchromium (27 PPM) were detected in the waste sediments.EP Tox for lead within sediments was below maximumallowable (5 PPM). Subsoil samples indicated elevatedconcentrations for lead (26 PPM) and chromium (25 PPM) .

GC/MS & O/HS - Low concentrations were detected for PAHsin the waste samples. These included <'.2-methylnaphthalene (0.91 PPM) and naphthalene(0.35 PPM). Pentachlorophenol was detected in thewaste at a concentration of 0.68 PPM. Chlorinatedhydrocarbons were detected in low concentration insubsoil samples. These included 1,1,1-trichloroethane(0.32 PPM), chlorobenzene (0.67 PPM), andtrichloroethylene (0.26 PPM). Total hydrocarbons weredetected in elevated concentrations for sediment wastes(154 PPM) and subsoil (1,330 PPM) samples.

ORG Superfund Site : Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-3 February 1, 1991

Asphalt Pit No« 1


Metals - A composite sample for five sampling locations inthe 12-inch waste depth had a concentration of 19,390PPM for lead. EP Tox for lead for the sample was ata concentration of 62.7 PPM. The maximum concentrationfor chromium was 193 PPM and EP Tox for chromium wasless than toxic characteristic limit (5 PPM).Concentrations detected in the subsoil samples belowthe waste were at or slightly above backgroundconcentrations.

GC/MS & O/HS - Naphthalene compounds and PAHs were detectedat concentrations between 78-440 PPM and 17-190 PPM,respectively in the waste samples. Very lowconcentrations were detected for PAHs in the subsoilsamples. Hydrocarbons were detected at elevatedconcentrations in the waste sediment (2,420 PPM)sample. Total hydrocarbons for subsoil sample(89.9 PPM) was below standard cleanup levels for soils(typically 100 to 150 PPM).

Slop Oil Ponds

Metals - Surface water samples indicated elevatedconcentrations for arsenic (0.22 PPM and 1.021 PPM) andchromium (0.013 PPM and 0.02 PPM ). Subsoils were atbackground concentrations. Sediments containedelevated concentrations for barium. (436 PPM), chromium(3,820 PPM), copper (255 PPM), and lead (2,348 PPM).EP Tox for lead and chromium were below toxiccharacteristic levels (5 PPM).


1I

I

GC/MS & O/HS - Waste sediments contained concentrations ofPAHs. Those include 2-methylnaphthalene (2,000 PPM),acenaphthene (91 PPM), anthracene (110 PPM),benzo(a)anthracene (300 PPM), benzo(b)fluoranthene(120 PPM), benzo(ghi)perylene (258 PPM), benzo(a)pyrene(222 PPM), chrysene (456 PPM), fluorene (170 PPM),naphthalene (350 PPM), phenanthrene (1,100 PPM), andpyrene (830 PPM). Benzene (28 PPM) , toluene (140 PPM) ,ethylbenzene (100 PPM), and xylene (880 PPM)concentrations were also detected. Total hydrocarbonsfor waste sediments was 2,380 PPM. Subsoil samples

} I contained PAHs including 2-methylnaphthalene (100 PPM),\* napthalene (15 PPM), acenaphthene (4.40 PPM),

anthracene (2.50 PPM), benzo(a)pyrene (0.59 PPM),iff chrysene (5.80 PPM), fluoranthene (0.12 PPM),I* phenanthrene (36 PPM), and pyrene (20 PPM). Total

hydrocarbons for subsoil sample was 423 PPM.

it "•*-,.

I fl Old Caustic Storage Pits. *• -


I

I

iiiiiiii

Metals - Elevated chromium (79 PPM) and lead (346 PPM)concentrations were in subsoils. EP Tox for lead wasless than the toxic characteristic level of 5 PPM.Waste sample had elevated concentration of lead (353PPM) and chromium (133 PPM).

GC/MS & O/HS - There were elevated concentrations of totalhydrocarbons in waste and subsoil. Naphthalenecompounds and PAHs were in very low concentrations.

General - Metals which may have leached from the causticsoda pits into the subsurface soils probably accountfor the high concentrations of metals in the subsurfacesoils. PH tests in the field indicate the waste tobe neutral (pH 7). Caustic soda is highly soluble inwater and the pH of the groundwater most likely hasbeen affected as evidenced by the high pH in the seepdowngradient of the caustic soda pits.

ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-5 February 1, 1991

t\ Lime soda Storage Pits

\ No surface water was in this area.•*-> - '

Metals - Elevated concentrations for barium (2,510 PPM),chromium (62 PPM), and lead (58 PPM) were detected inwaste samples. EP Tox for barium in a subsoil sample

• (<1 PPM) was less than toxic characteristic level[ (100 PPM). Subsoil sample had elevated concentration

for lead (619 PPM). EP Tox for lead (1.9 PPM) was1 less than the toxic characteristic level (5 PPM).'I'

GC/MS & O/HS - High concentrations were detected forI naphthalene compounds in sediment samples. There was

an elevated concentration of total hydrocarbons in thesediment samples (114 PPM) , and a higher concentration

\ in the subsoil (574 PPM).

! North Pond System

I » Metals - Elevated concentrations in sediments for chromium* (404 PPM), lead (593 PPM), barium (31.4 PPM), mercury

(0.73 PPM) and arsenic (11 PPM) were detected. EP ToxI for lead (0.652 PPM) and chromium (0.047 PPM) were less

than toxic characteristic levels (5 PPM).i Concentrations in subsoil sample from NP-1 were at ori below background levels.

' GC/MS & O/HS - Concentrations of naphthalene compounds,I phenols, PAHs and hydrocarbons were detected in

sediment samples. Very small concentrations of someof these compounds were detected in subsoils. Totalhydrocarbons were 354 PPM in sediment and 3.3 PPM in

i• subsoil sample from NP-1.


It

iitri1

tii

ii

Buried Acid Pits


Metals - Elevated concentration for barium (295 PPM) wasdetected in sediment from Pit BA-3. All other metalsin sediment were at background levels.

GC/M5 & O/HS - Low concentrations of naphthalene compoundsand volatile hydrocarbons (BTEX) were detected insediments. The total hydrocarbons level was at1,500 PPM.

General - Metals in the Acid Pits may have gone intosolution and entered the groundwater regime asevidenced by the high metal concentrations in the acidseeps. During sampling activities testing of the wasteand subsurface soils at BA-1 and BA-3 indicated the pHof the samples to range from pH = 0 to pH = 2.Sampling and testing for pH in BA-2 and by visualobservation of the samples indicated that no wasteexists in the pit.

South Pond System

Metals - Elevated concentrations for arsenic (6.20 PPM),chromium (333 PPM) and lead (131 PPM) were detected inPond SP-2 waste sediment sample. EP Tox for chromium(0.019 PPM) was less than the toxic characteristiclevel(5 PPM). Elevated chromium (170 PPM) was alsodetected in Pond SP-3 waste. EP Tox for chromium(0.043 PPM) was also less than toxic characteristiclevel (5 PPM) in SP-3 waste sample. An elevated

I Jjj concentration for arsenic (9.70 PPM) was also detected\ • in SP-5. ' .;

/ • GC/MS & O/HS - All ponds were below laboratory detection' limits. A small concentration of fluorene (0.11 PPM)

« was detected in Pond SP-5 sediment sample.

.

ORC Superfund Site Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 3-7 February 1, 1991

II

Old Storage Pits


Metals - Elevated concentrations for chromium (934 PPM),lead (2,488 to 20,530 PPM), arsenic (16 PPM), copper(143 PPM), mercury (1.40 PPM), barium (312 PPM), andnickel (30 PPM) were detected in the waste samples. EPTox for lead (9.829 PPM) was higher than toxiccharacteristic level (5 PPM) in the waste sample.Detected low to moderate concentrations for PAHs inthe waste and total hydrocarbons in the waste was high(4,430 PPM). Subsurface soil below the waste hadelevated concentration for lead (117 PPM). Subsoil hadlow concentrations for PAHs except for2-methylnaphthalene (100 PPM).

6C/MS & O/HS - Detected concentrations in wastes ofnaphthalene compounds and PAHs were in the low tomoderate range. There were low concentrations ofhydrocarbons for BTEX. The total hydrocarbons levelwas as high as 4,430 PPM (OS-7). Subsoils indicatedlow concentrations of PAHs and BTEX. Totalhydrocarbons were highest in OS-5 & OS-7 (46.80 PPM,each).

Pitch Pits

No surface water was in this area.. - * *

Metals - Concentrations for metals in waste were at or belowbackground concentrations. Subsoil samples were alsoat or below background.

GC/MS & O/HS - Sediments contained typical concentrationsof PAHs associated with asphaltic pitch. Lowconcentrations of total hydrocarbons were detected inthe waste and subsoils.


r*

IIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Asphalt Pits 2 & 3


Metals - Slightly elevated concentrations were detected insediments for lead and chromium, 42 and 30 PPM,respectively.

GC/MS & O/HS - Sediments contained low concentrations ofPAHs and naphthalene compounds.

Sludge Traps

Metals - Surface waters in the sludge traps had elevatedconcentrations for barium (0.066 PPM), lead(0.112 PPM), zinc (0.145 PPM), copper (0.024 PPM), andchromium (0.02 PPM). Waste contained elevatedconcentrations of chromium (24,020 PPM) in Sludge TrapNo. 4, arsenic (30 PPM) and lead (732 PPM) in SludgeTrap No. 3, and mercury (2.46 PPM) in Sludge TrapNo. 1. EP Tox concentrations were below toxiccharacteristic levels for lead (0.237 PPM) and chromium(2.808 PPM). Subsoil samples had elevatedconcentrations of barium (270 PPM), chromium (44 PPM)and arsenic (10 ppm).

ORC Superfund Site .Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-9 October 1990

I

I GC/MS & O/HS - Analytical results for surface waters frommost of the sludge traps showed concentrations below

| laboratory detection limits except for Sludge Trap No.' 1 and Sludge Trap No. 3. In each of these

2,4-dimethylphenol (.004 PPM each) and phenol! (0.002 PPM each) were detected in the first sampling

event of the sludge traps early in the Phase I fieldI activities. Waste sediments had low to moderate[ concentrations of PAHs. The highest concentrations for

PAHs was detected in Sludge Trap No. 2. These includedI naphthalene (253 PPM), phenanthrene (260.80 PPM), andI fluorene (78 PPM). Subsequently during field

activities a prolonged rainfall event infiltrated thei shallow groundwater regime causing a significant rise1 in the groundwater table. As a result groundwater, infiltrated the sludge traps and visual contamination( of the sludge traps was observed. A second sampling

event was conducted for Sludge Trap No. 4 as it\ appeared to be impacted the most. Analytical resultsI indicated low concentrations (< 1 PPM) of contamination

from hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the surface water. During) sampling of bottom sediments and subsurface soil below{ the waste visual observation of the samples clearly

indicated the .alluvial soils and sandstone to beI saturated with oily (hydrocarbon) wastes.

METHYLPHENOL SPILL AREAS

During the Phase I field activities a methylphenol spill wasobserved west of tanks 68 and 29 and east of the Spent LimeSoda Trap. Visual observation indicated a red stained areaapproximately 20 feet by 70 feet. A surface soil sample wasobtained for analytical testing. The results are discussedbelow.

Metals - Results indicated elevated concentrations forarsenic (21 PPM), barium (180 PPM), and lead (45 PPM).Slightly elevated concentrations were observed fornickel (10 PPM) and zinc (19 PPM).

ORC Superfund Site ••• Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-10 October 1990

I

I1I1

iiiiiii

11iiii

GC/MS & o/HS -Results indicated the stained area to becontaminated with phenols. Those included2,4-dimethylphenol (160 PPM), 2-methylphenol (1,700PPM), 4-methylphenol (5,400 PPM), and phenol(4,200 PPM).

While conducting the Phase I field investigation, salvagingoperations were being conducted concurrently by CyrilPetrochemical Company. During the salvaging operations aspill from a tank located near the facility warehouseoccurred on April 30, 1990. The spill was not adequatelycleaned up to prevent future contamination. Two days latera rainfall event occurred and spread contaminants across aparking area east of the warehouse and into nearby sumps.Sample number 61 was collected from the liquid in the sumppit and sample number 62 was collected from surface soil inthe contamination zone. The results are discussed below.

Metals - Concentrations for metals in red liquid sampleNo. 61 indicated elevated concentrations for arsenic(96.55 PPM), chromium (1.338 PPM), lead (0.489 PPM),and nickel (.675 PPM). EP Tox for arsenic indicateda concentration (96.12 PPM) significantly above toxiccharacteristics (0.05 PPM). Concentrations for metalsfrom soil sample (sample No. 62) had elevatedconcentrations for arsenic (70 PPM), barium (310 PPM),cadmium (1.60 PPM), chromium (184 PPM), copper(533 PPM), lead (250 PPM), mercury (6.10 PPM), nickel(30 PPM), and zinc (401 PPM). EP Tox for lead(0.411 PPM), chromium (0.079 PPM), and mercury(0.0056 PPM) were all below toxic characteristic limitsfor each compound. Those are 5 PPM for lead andchromium and 0.2 PPM for mercury. . j

GC/MS & O/HS - Analytical results indicatedconcentrations of phenols in both samples. Sample No.61 contained concentrations of 2,4-dimethylphenol i(750 PPM), 2-methylphenol (4,700 PPM), 4-methylphenol(26,000 PPM), and phenol (39,000 PPM). Concentrationsdetected in sample No. 62 included 2,4-dimethylphenol(200 PPM), 2-methylphenol (160 PPM), 4-methylphenoi(1,800 PPM), and phenol (3,200 PPM).


TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WASTE SOURCES

WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PP*alkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar Sunberyl linncadmiumchromiuncopperep tox arsenicep tox bar innep tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzene >n-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluene .xylene

(3)SOUTH POND SIS 1 titSP-1WASTE181

82.00

23.0011.00

11.00

12.0031.00

1.33

SP-2WASTE182

6.20118

33329.00

0.02

131

9.7034.00

0.48

SP-3WASTE183

8.60U3

94.0012.00:

11.00'10.0025.00

13.50

0.47 J

WASTE221

215

17026.00

0.04

25.000.4516.0059.00

SP-4WASTEyy»

229

34.0016.00

12.000.3013.0030.00

2.48

0.09 J

0.01 J0.13 J

SP-5WASTE•m

9.7085.00

46.003.70

6.400.286.5016.00

1.26

SP-6WASTE245

9.4068.00

16.005.90

6.40

8.6014.00

2.34

ASPHALT FLOW AREAASPHALT

S8S211

19.00

1934.90

0.05

51.00

19911.00

24200.13 J86.80 J

0.44 J478 J

SBS212

19.00124

11.0018.00

11.00

9.6020.00

0.53

ASPHALTPITHo.1AP-1SBS188

146

17.0025.00

17.00

14.0022.00

12.90

0.47 J

III

LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

•nd associated blank.J « Indicates on estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/co (field neasurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 ft SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure BOM 3-1 for waste

source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not

shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit.

3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi11.

4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

IIIIIIIIIII

I II I1IIIIIIIII


HASTE SOURCES


GC/NS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethytphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyi- phenol2-methyln8phthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneecenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a}anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenio(q.h. Doervlenebenzolk)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfideehlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

(3)SOUTH POND SYSTEMSP-1WASTE181

0.02 P

SP-2WASTE182

0.18 P

SP-3WASTE183

3.80 P0.08 P

WASTE221

0.04 P

SP-4WASTE7??

1.30 P

0.09 P

SP-5WASTE223

0.23 P

0.11

0.09 P

SP-6WASTE245

ASPHALT FLOW AREAASPHALT

S8S211

62.00

35,0011.0028.00

0.66

0.37

1.50 P6.70

6.409.20

0.131.70

2.20

SBS212

' 0.02

0.04

1.50 P

0.02

ASPHALTPITNo.1AP-1SBS188

1.30

0.120.02

6.30 P

0.07

0.05

0.31

1.40 P0.02 P

1.90

0.95

0.03

0.17J 0.19

LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B * Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J « Indicates en estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.'(1) Standard Unit (field Masurement).(2) ujthos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure *"* »-* for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.

4. Where a concentration is not shown ;for EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

TABLE 3-3

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSWASTE SOURCES

WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1) .specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcodoerep tox arseniceo tox bar inneo tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

3RGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetoluenexylene

ASPHALT PIT Ho.1AP-1

S8S189

207

14.0018.00

13.00

U.OO18.00

89.90

2.04 J

5.58 J

WASTE190

26.0093.00

0.6431.00241

62.68193905.5010.00121

86630.70 J26.80 J

73.70 J

ASPHALT PITSAP-2WASTE258

3.70

12.001.50

12.000.401.209.20

0.05

0.008 J

0.004 J

AP-3WASTE254

9.50

30.0019.00

42.000.35

33.00

BURIED ACID PITSBA-1

SBS249

99.00

16.004.70

5.50

7.5016.00

5.97

WASTE247

149

19.004.70

9.10

11.0017.00

1500

4.55 J

114 J

WASTE248

87.00

15.008.50

5.10

8.1016.00

348

1.08 J

42.00 J

BA-2SBS250

166

17.0014.00

11.00

17.0023.00

BA-3SBS? ?

16.00

2.0010.00

604

1.87 J

12.70 J

WASTE251

295

11.005.80

15.00

5.2088.00

0.02

0.005 J

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) urhos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure not a-i for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

11iiiiiiiiiiiiiiI


WASTE SOURCES


GC/MS.PPM1 . 1 . 1 • tr i ch I oroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaohthalene4-methvl phenolacenaohtheneaeenaohthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a ianth racenebenzo(a)pypenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzo(q.h. Ooerylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf ide -ehlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethvlphthaleteethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2.3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenoloyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

ASPHALT PIT No.1AP-1

SBS189

18.00

0.70 P

0.06

1.60 P

2.30

9.20

4.70

0.07

0.46

WASTE190

440

17.00

23.00

1.20 P78.00

190

98.00

41.00

ASPHALT PITSAP-2WASTE258

3.70

0.74

14.0016.00

1.506.90

5.70 P

29.00

4.20

2.705.80

18.00 P0.73 P

1.10

6.60

24.00

AP-3WASTE254

11.00

0.75

8.20

11.00

1.206.00

2.30

6.90

0.05

BURIED ACID PITS. ' BA-1

SBS249

0.05 P

0.84 P0.01 P

0.05

WASTE247

37.00

0.39 P48.00

52.00

WASTE248

4.40

0.71 P6.10

16.00

BA-2SBS250

0.01 P

BA-3SBS252

4.50

5.20

WASTE251

'.

4.00 P

0.006

0.01 P

LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

i

NOTES1. See Figure am 3-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge .Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill..

4. Uhere a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91


WASTE SOURCES


INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcoooerec tox arsenicep tox bariumeo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-oropyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

LAND TREATMENT AREALAND TREATMENT

SBS232

20.00305

44465.00

0.050.53460

15.00196

0.22

SBS233

158

28623.00

0.050.211410.4013.00107

0.75

SBS234

34.00

18.009.20

8.40

12.0023.00

6.450.31 J0.34 J

0.32 J0.37 J

S8S235

134

15.0014.00

12.00

12.0023.00

LIME SODA PITLSSP

SBS237

114

21.009.30

1.92619

24.0033.00

574

131 J

96.10 J

SBS238

2510

20.0035.00

0.37

18.00

19.0033.00

18.30

1.63 J

3.87 J

WASTE236

41.00

62.0010.00

58.00

11.2037.00

114

1.16 J

14.60 J

NORTH POND SYS 1 EMNP-1

SBS148

144

16.0083.00

14.00

11.0035.00

3.30

WASTE1*7

7.5089.00

85.0012.00

0.65277

3.9011.00

354

18.10 J

32.90 J

NP-2WASTE216

9.90128

40430.00

0.02

5930.7313.0056.00

42.10

0.62 J

0.76 J

1

Iiii

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in cample

and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure COM 1-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Snipnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91


WASTE SOURCES


GC/MS.PPM1.1. 1 -triehloroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2*methy (naphthalene4-methvl phenolecenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenz o ( a ) ant h r acenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzoC b) f I uoranthenebenzo(g.h. i )perylenebenzo(k)f I uoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethyl benzenef I uoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2j3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethvlenexvlene

L

.SBS232

0.01 B

AND TREATLAND TRESBS233

1.70 P

0.009 B

WENT AREAATMENTS8S23*

0.97 P

0.02

0.01 B

0.03

SBS235

0.68 P

0.01 B

UK

SBS237

6.50

20.00 P

0.68

3.00 P2.20

8.30

1: SODA PILSSPSBS238

0.18 P

0.003 P

0.006

T

UASTE236

360

0.78 P

1.20

16.00

27.00

2.50

0.08 P110

95.00

230

NORTHNP-

S8S1*8

6.30

13.003.4020.000.30

0.28 B0.22

1.70 B

-

0.03

1.20

3.2020.000.85

0.04

0.60

POND SYS1UASTE147

18.00

7.501507.50

11.000.739.801.10

0.96

3.203.907.8035.00

2.70 P18.00

1802.80120

30.00

TEHNP-2UASTE216

5.20

4.40

20.00

1.10

11.009.20

1.90 P

64.00

98.00

0.39

LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Sot I Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure •m 1-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

02/08/91


WASTE SOURCES


INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NoH (1)'specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl linncadmiumeh ram inncoppereo tox arseniceo tox bariuneo tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynizckelnc

ORGAN I CS t MS. PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butyl benzenetoluenexylene

NORTH POND SYSTEMNP-3WASTE178

9.5093.00

68.0010.00

75.00

6.9027.00

329

11.40 J

4.70 J44.00 J

NP-4WASTE179

86.00

21513.00

0.05

59.000.508.4040.00

NP-5WASTE217

282

11015.00

0.01

18.000.3515.0043.00

3.12

NP-6WASTE218

j

11.0057.00

33.005.20

6.800.254.9023.00

MP-7WASTE219

6.003141.30

23149.00

28.000.3818.00106

0.46

OIL SKIMMER PONDSSK-1

S8S201

37.0092.00

0.5130.0029.00

6.0113130.638.3042.00

60013.60 J34.80 J

54.10 J

WASTE52

7.10383

1.40166

78.00

0.020.313251.9019.00257

1.56

WASTE202

107255

11561.00

. 0.11

1.063852.2316.00116

SW51

10434.00338

6.201029285

0.08

0.15

SK-2S8S200

6.30127

32.0075.00

21.5637240.9810.00112

126065.50 J57.30 J

52.80 J126 J

ii1iliiiiIiiiiitiii

LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in staple

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure am 3-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. •

4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundMas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

IIiiiiifiiiiiiii


HASTE SOURCES


GC/NS.PPM1.1,1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaphth8lene4-methyl phenolecenaphtheneaeenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(e)anthracenebenzo(8)Dvrenebenzo(bjf luoranthenebenzo(Q.h. i )perytenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disutfidechlorobenzeneehrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthelatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethyl benzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

NORTH POND STSItMHP-3WASTE178

0.90 P

3.40 P0.77 P

6.20

0.09

NP-4WASTE179

0.13 P

NP-5WASTE217

0.37 P

0.43 P

NP-6WASTE218

1.30 P

0.05 P

NP-7WASTE .219

0.64 P

0.05 P

OIL SKINNER PONDSSK-1

S8S201

43.00

0.22

8.10 P

1.40

7.60

1.90 P0.23 P11.00

14.00

7.50

1.60

10.00

WASTE52

WASTE202

0.36 P

0.15 B0.02 B

SW51

SK-2S8S200

180

1.80

9.40

2.60 P29.00

55.00

30.00

12.00

38.00

LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) «*os/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

I

NOTES1. See Figure mt 3-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parameters 'performed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge.Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

[1IIIIIII1I

11iiII11IIII


WASTE SOURCES


INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN ICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-prooyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetoluenexylene

OIL SKINNER PONDSSK-2WASTE199

25.00154

0.81324

84.00

0.021.849761.0512.00256

71.90

4.43 J

3.09 J7.07 J

SK-SBS194

333

46.0060.00

72.00

21.0040.00

41.00

2.90 J

4.90 J

3WASTE193

14.00260

1.10530

73.00

0.040.312591.2516.00371

27.90

0.13 J

0.58 J

OLD CAUSTIC PITOC-8

SBS241

46.00

79.007.80

0.33346

6.6053.00

515

33.10 J

62.70

WASTE240

14.0032.00

13314.00

0.13353

5.40107

928

75.10 J

87.40 J

OC-9SBS244

160

11.0011.00

43.00

8.6016.00

204

10.10 J

25.40 J

WASTE243

21.00

3.409.70

52.00

7.40

464

24.80 J

48.80 J

OLD STORAGE PITSOS-1

SBS228

135

13.0021.00

22.00

12.0025.00

0.57

WASTE229

13.00

30.004.40

7;30

9.907.20

OS-2SBS214

62.00

21.0090.00

71.000.7812.0051.00

1.79

0.11 J

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B • Compound Mas found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

Mith sample 245.

I

NOTES1. See Figure BOM J-i for waste

. source sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not


3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

TABLE 3-3



GC/MS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2,4-dimethyiphenol2.4-dinitrophenol2-methyl- phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzoC a ) anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo( b) f luoranthenebenzo(g.h. i )perylenebenzo( k ) f luoranthenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylphthalatedibenzo(ah)anthreeenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1 2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

OIL STIUCR PONDSSt-ZUASTE199

4.20

0.51 P

0.09

11.00 P

0.13

0.23 P0.07 P

37.00

19.00

0.21

1.30

SK-3SBS194

1.60

12.00 P

0.04

1.70 P0.05 B

0.06

0.31

UASTE193

0.58

20.00 P

0.40

2.70

OLD CAUSTIC PITOC-8

S8S241

14.00

0.35

0.34

4.00

0.71

0.13

0.03

7.50

UASTE240

23.00

0.42 P

0.51

9.10

1.20

0.52

6.10

OC-9S8S244

2.10

0.15 P

0.36

0.32

0.60

0.78

0.27

2.90

UASTE243

0.28

0.03

0.06 P

0.38


SBS228

0.02 P

4.90 P

0.02 P

UASTE229

6.40

0.02 P

3.50

OS-2SBS214

0.003

0.10 P

0.01

0.03

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.UASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates.an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field neasurenent).(2) urahos/cm (field Measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with cample245.

NOTES1. See Figure w* »-* for waste

source sample locations.2. Where • concentration is not


3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi 11...


02/08/91

IIIIIIIIIIII


WASTE SOURCES



INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butytbenzenetoluenexylene

OLD STORAGE PITSOS-2WASTE213

1.403.50

1.401.60

2000

257 J

382 J

OS-3SBS77S

183

21.0033.00

U.OO

18.0030.00

WASTE224

1.50

63.00

21.001.10

OS-4WASTE209

201

23.0072.00

9.40

25.0037.00

200

15.90 J

8.37 J6.59 J

OS-5SBS231

120

21.0018.00

117

• 10.0029.00

46.80

1.84 J

1.77 J5.56 J

WASTE230

159

79.0059.00

9.83205300.25

66.00

138023.10 J51.10 J

103 J

OS-6SBS207

1471.30

32.0076.00

13.00

30.0065.00

160

3.17 J

6.93 J

WASTE208

16.00214

934143

0.160.4824881.439.2083.00

725

32.20 J

65.00 J

OS-7:SBS205

215

63.0032.00

24.00

13.0035.00

46.80

1.27 J

2.44 J

WASTE203

312

11.0040.00

37.00

5.4018.00

4430

21.40 J

66.80 J I

II

1II

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface So<I Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure *DM a-i fOr waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. •••

4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundMBS not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91


HASTE SOURCES


GC/KS.PPM1 . 1 . 1 - 1 r i ch I oroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dim'trophenol2-mcthyl phenol2-methvlnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(e)anthracenebenzo(a)oyrenebenzo(b) f luoranthenebenzo(g.h.i)perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyt) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf idechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlohthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthatateethvlbenzenef luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachloroohenolohenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

OU> STORAGE PITSOS-2WASTE213

46.00

6.90

6.000.1323.0016.00

51.00

0.787.8021.00

1.80 P

A3. 00

30.00

3.20

7.60

OS-3S8S225

0.40 P

0.03 P

UASTE224

3.10

0.08 P

0.17

OS-4UASTE209

36.007.8033.000.4160.00

0.04 P

0.09

0.2B P

0.06

0.25

0.05 P

42.00

0.75

1.70

OS-5S8S231

6.00 P

0.02

0.11

0.01 8

0.18

0.79

UASTE230

36.00

0.44 P

7.30

6.30

2.90

26.00

05-6SBS207

22.00

0.56 P1.100.050.35

0.68

0.520.705.00

1.90

13.00

4.20

0.53

3.10

UASTE208

14.00

0.65

1.800.46

0.20

2.40

3.300.914.20

0.47 P1.50

15.00

9.30

8.00

33.00

OS-7SBS205

1.90

0.02

2.50 P

0.13

0.21

0.03 P

0.56

0.42

1.50

UASTE203

68.00

0.18

0.57

1.90

8.30 P0.66 P

7.10

1.30

10.00

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B » Compound was found In sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sanple 245.

NOTES1. See Figure *w »-l for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

IIIIIIIIII1I1iii

TABLE 3-3

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSHASTE SOURCES



INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiunchromiumeoooereo tox arseniceo tox bariumeo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butvl benzenen-oroovl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene


WASTE204

1461.30

23.0034.00

9.90

24.0044.00

48.90

1.90 J

6.92 J

WASTE206

216

37.0031.00

0.36139

9.7023.00

173

1.24 J

2.15 J

PHENOLSPILLSUMPSW61

96.550.22

1.341.7696.12

0.49

0.682.81

PITCH PITSPP-1

SBS184

184

20.0023.00

11.00

16.0029.00

0.95

WASTE195

4.60

1.30

1.10

17.50

PP-2SBS186

128

41.0013.00

7.40

9.2016.00

PP-3SBS187

97.00

10.005.90

5.90

8.6015.00

4.71

PUMP PITSPU-1

SBS256

71.00

25.0013.00

26.00

12.00,31.00

1330

79.60 J

72.70 J

WASTE255

130

27.008.60

1031070.306.4014.00

4.780.04 J0.05 J

0.05 J0.16 J

PU-3WASTE257

62.00

5.807.40

38.00

4.506.20

154

0.60 J

1.21 J

I

I

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field neasureroent).(2) umhos/cn (field Measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure KM a-i for waste


shown, the compound was belowthe detection Unit.

3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1. Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps; and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91


HASTE SOURCES


jC/MStPPH1,1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dimtrophenol2-methyl phenol2-tnethvlnaDhthatene4-methyl phenoleeenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthracenebenzol a ipyrenebenzo( b) f I uoranthenebenzot u .h . i leervlenebenzoC k ) f luorenthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) ohthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrvsenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlch thai atedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef I uoranthenefluoreneindeno( 1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene


UASTE204

5.70

0.08

0.18

0.42

0.19 P

1.50

0.56

0.81

2.00

UASTE206

0.802.901.70

0.50

0.88

0.37

0.040.400.33

0.04 P

3.001.903.50

0.07

0.51

P8EUOLSPILLSIMPSW61

750

4700

26000

39000

3.30

PITCH PITSPP-I

S8S184

0.01 B

0.01 P

UASTE195

0.50

0.02 B4.80

73.00280

45.00440

35.00

120

23.00

11.00

84.000.03 B0.01 B

21.00

190

PP-2S8S186

0.04 B

0.04 B0.02 P

PP-3S8S187

0.003 B

0.006 B0.003 P

PUMP PITSPU-1

S8S256

0.32

4.60

0.67

0.67

0.08

1.70

0.600.262.00

UASTE255

0.91

0.350.68

0.41

PU-3UASTE257

0.36

1.70 B

0.04 P

0.06

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compowd was found in saople

and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure mat 3-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill..-'


02/08/91

1 TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WASTE SOURCES

1I11

1I1

WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSHEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.


INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-propyt benzenesec-butyl benzenetoluenexvlene

SLOP OIL PtMDSSO-1

SBS162

173

25.0011.00

15.00

6.106.00

308

18.90 J

46.20 J

SBS163

364

13558.00

7.70

20.0041.00

423

23.10 J

UASTE27

28.0039.00

34023.00

0.070.222322.50

48.00

56.70

6.76 J

17.60 J

UASTE161

200334

38202550.34

0.330.0723483.8529.00396

2380103 J163 J

595 J

sw28

453143395

366

1.020.07

0.02

0.009

SO-2SBS150

109

15.0011.00

6.20

9.9021.00

267

3.50 J

6S.90 J

UASTE31

45.00436

0.691613150

0.080.05880

15.00840

206063.80 J256 J

82.30 J

266 J

UASTEH9

25.00226

171283.00

0.05

6540.9012.00187

1920

103 J

201 J

SW32

380123396

7.701490377

0.220.01

-

0.01

0.02

,

SLUDGETRAPSST-1SBS192

143

12.007.60

9.6021.00

44.40

1.94 J

0.52 J8.97 J

II1II1I

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.UASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sanple 245.

I

MOTES1. Se« Figure rat s-i for waste

nource sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not

nhown, the compound was belowithe detection limit.

3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill. -

4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundHBS not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91


WASTE SOURCES


JC/NS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethene2,4-dimethylphenol2,4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methyl naphtha I ene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo<e)anthracenebenzo(a)ovrenebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzoig,h, i)perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzylphthaletecarbon disulf idech I orobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylohthalatedfbenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalene

jentechlorophenolphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

SLOP OIL PONDSSO-1

SBS162

100

4.40

0.30 P2.400.49

0.08

5.80

4.20

8.10

0.17 P21.00

36.00

20.00

5.40

39.00

S8S163

75.00

3.20

0.25 P2.50

0.59

43.00 P

2.80

3.20

6.60

2.50 P0.16 P15.00

27.00

11.00

2.30

-29,00.

WASTE27

96.98

13.69

22.870.74182222120258

40.0012.53 P

456

33.87

1.8049.7657.6439.78

26.35 P

19.24

326

787

2.32

13.04

WASTE161

2000

91.00

88.00 P110

17.00300220

17.00

450

10071.00170

18.00950 P

18.00 P350

1100

830

140

880

SU28

SO-2S8S150

14.00

0.72

9.30 P0.22

7.00 B

0.11

1.300.121.20

34.00 P0.79 P

2.40

5.30

1.20

0.72

12.00

WASTE31

571

36.24

1249 P30.93

28.10 J

39.27

36.18 P

136

44.91 J44.20126

122

308

156

29.52 J

346 J

WASTE149

45.00

2.70

2.00 P0.37

1.10

0.51

4.00

5.00 P0.65 P7.80

8.70

2.20

0.54

5.90

sw32

SLUDGETRAPSST-1SBS192

0.13 B

0.15

0.46

1.60 P

0.64

1.90

LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found In sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 t SP-6 composited

with sample 245.

MOTES1. See Figure »w»-lfor waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Snipnear Phenol Spill.


02/08/91

IIIIIjlilIIIIIIilitilllIil


WASTE SOURCES


INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDM (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumchromium

. coooerep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiunep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

DRGANICS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

SLUDGE TRAPSST-1

WASTE5

110

27631.00

1.64

68.002.4612.00170

2600174 J261 J

149 J143 J462 J

WASTE191

146

15816.00

0.48

40.001.059.0073.00

124031.60 J85.80 J

145 J

su4

18850.005350.607.041530492

0.06

0.01

0.15

ST-2WASTE12

110

0.81313

34.00

0.45

85.001.4611.00229

1030

122 J

55.00 J250 J

WASTE174

8.8068.00

37618.00

2.44

37.00

8.50136

183056.40 J

135 J

65.40 J252 J

SU11

16947.004640.506.801450410

0.05

0.06

ST-3WASTE9

101

0.52168

29.00

0.17

64.000.9411.00152

2440363 J214 J

234 J

WASTE175

10.00209

41830.00

0.130.107320.4512.00213

6243.20 J46.30 J

96.40 J

SW8

10130.002370.906.801270176

0.04

0.06

ST-4S8S172

>

28.00

44.005.00

17.00

5.6030.00

4750357 J155 J

413 J893 J

LEGENDSU • Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure «w >-l for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spi11. •


02/08/91

3.3



EC/MS. PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethvlphenol2.4-dimtroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methy I not* tha I ene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a ) anthracenebenio(B>Dyrenebenzo( b) f I uoranthenebenzo(g.h.i)oerylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethvlhexvt) phthalatebutylbenzylphthalatecarbon disulfideehlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octvlphthaletedibenzo<:ah>anthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethvVbemen*f luoranthenefluoreneindeno(1,2.3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneDentachlorophenolphenanthrenephenoloyrenestvrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexvlene

SLUDGE TRAPSST-1

WASTE5

240

11.00

6.60

2.80

18.00

2057 P71.00

53.00

7.20

61.40

281

WASTE191

33.00

4.10

12.00

1.20

24.00 P3.30 P

8.90

24.00

86.00

su4

0.004

0.007 B

0.002

ST-2WASTE«

25.60

5.13

95. 76

77.65

2793 P

253

261

57.01

875

WASTEm

150

7.20

13.00 P

2.40

4.30

17.00

10.00

88.00 P

37.00

43.00

16.00

41.00

120

SU11

0.002

0.002

ST-3WASTE9

300

11.00

808 P3.50

20.00

77.00

64.00

9.50

WASTE175

26.00

1.70

53.00 P

2.80

250 P5.60 P5.90

13.00

4.60

16.00

sw8

ST-4SBS172

120

4.40

58.00 P

25.00

140 P

160

6.50

300 P

50.00

15.00

360

1100

\.

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) mhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 I SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure *at 1-1 for waste



3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill...


02/08/91

IP(I(I(IIll(I(IIllI

TABLE 3-3



INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMelkalchlor

nitvde

hardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1) -specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiumchromiuncoooerep tox arsenicep tox bariumeo tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

QRGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec - buty I benzenetoluenexylene

SLUDGE TRAPSST-*

UASTE90

183

79042.00

0.120.101200.9019.00318

125

4.54 J

2.29 J10.10 J

UASTE169

26.00175

0.712402076.00

1.640.111830.6513.00772

193069.20 J

160 J

217 J

SU89

0.07

0.020.02

0.11

0.10

1.36

0.0040.14 J0.009 J0.05 J

0.02 J

ST-4/5UASTE16

264

138985.00

0.04

2060.52

648

165

18.10 J

5.81 J

8.57 J

SU • :

15

95.0021.002290.708.20680166

0.05

0.07

ST-5UASTE173

15.00118

141063.00

2.810.131410.487.60584

243028.60 J238 J

308 J

ST-6SBS167

124

12.008.50

7.50

12.0017.00

53.101

1.85 J

2.71 J

S8S168

184

10.008.10

7.00

9.9015.00

28.30

2.87 J

UASTE19

30.00162

115156.00

0.04

83.000.3020.00349

23.4011.40 J

0.84 J

UASTE166

12.00110

92832.00

0.490.151800.458.80220

38402796 J89.50 J

135 J

1

I

1

Im

I

I

LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.UASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Uaste.B * Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J = indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cjn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

IIOTES'I. See Figure •"• >-i for waste

source sample locations.Z. Where a concentration is not' shown, the compound was below

the detection limit.3. Analysis for indicator parameters

performed for surface samples only:Oil Skinner Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, and Sumpnear Phenol Spill.

it. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

i; TABLE 3-3SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WASTE SOURCES

f: WASTE SOURCE TYPESAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.

GC/MS.PPM1.1.1-trichloroethane2.4-dimethylphenol2.4-dinitroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaohtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo(a)anthrecenebenzo ( a ) oy renebenzo(b)f luoranthenebenzo(a.h.i)perylenebenzo( k ) f luoranthenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthelatebutylbenzyluhthalatecarbon disulfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi-n-butylphthalatedi-n-octylohthalatedibenzo(ah)snthracenedibenzofurandiethylphthalateethvlbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenepent ach I oropheno Iohenanthrenephenolpyrenesty renetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

SLUDGE TRAPSsi -*

UASTE90

11.00

13.00 P

9.40

0.36

2.20

34.00 P

5.30

7.00

0.18

2.80

UASTE169

210

12.00

37.00 P

2.60

17.00

17.00

21.00

240 P

44.00

93.00

27.00

37.00

99.00

su89

0.21

0.007

6.200.003

0.0030.002

0.009

0.007

0.0030.01

8.60

0.03

0.03

0.02

ST-4/5UASTE16

8.51

85.42 P

4.67

211 P

17.45

0.51

SU15

ST-5UASTE173

250

4.702.20

2.60

22.00

25.00

230 P

52.00

95.00

17.00

35.00

140

ST-6S8S167

5.50

12.00 P

68.00 P2.20 P

SBS168

3.50

32.00 P

0.57

140 P0.94 P

1.60

UASTE19

UASTE166

53.00

12.00 P

1.10

7.70

4.20

120 P0.65 P9.90

15.00

4.00

10.00

65.00

1IiiiiIiiiiii

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.WASTE - Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface SoiI Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field Measurement).(2) untios/cn (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure *a* >-i for waste





02/08/91

IIII1IIIIIII1IIIIII


WASTE SOURCES



INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliumcadmiumchromiumcopperep tox arsenicep tox bariumep tox chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-proovl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

SLUDGE TRAPSST-6SU18

77.0013.001560.708.20590

99.00

0.02

0.01

0.05

ST-7S8S165

10.00270

13.0089.00

11.00

12.0033.00

2.47

HASTE23

8.60146

0.54374

19.00

48.000.365.60119

24.20

2.30 J

0.54 J

2.97 J

WASTE164

164

10617.00

0.120.24181

0.3511.0031.00

107

3.69 J

13.30 J

SU22

85.0017.001760.508.10550115

0.03

0.06

sw128

10418.00356

210

0.04

0.03

LEGENDSW • Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS - Subsurface Soil Below Waste.B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure n* >-l for waste



3.- Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface samples only:Oil Skimmer Pond No. 1, Slop OilPond No. 1, Sludge Traps, end Sumpnear Phenol Spill. ..


02/08/91

ITABLE 3-3



JC/KS.PPK1.1.1-trichloroethane2,4-dimethylphenol2,4-dinitrophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebenzo( a )anthracenebenzo(e)oyrenebenzo(b)f luorenthenebenzoO.h. i )perylenebenzo(k)f luoranthenebis(2-ethvlhexyl) phthalatebutylbenzvlphthalatecarbon disutfidechlorobenzenechrysenedi -n-buty Iphthalatedi-n-oetvlchthalatedibenzo(ah)anthracenedibenzofurandiethylohthalateethylbenzenef luoranthenef luoreneindeno(1j2.3 cd)pyrenemethvl ethyl ketonemethyl ene chloridenaphthalenepent ach 1 orooheno Iphenanthrenephenolpyrenestyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexv 1 ene

SUJDGE TRAPSST-6SU18

ST-7SBS165

0.39 P0.03 P

2.50

WASTE23

WASTE164

210

8.302.30

15.00

23.00

220 P

43.00

76.00

43.00

41.00

130

SU22

SU128

*

I.

LEGENDSW - Surface Water.WASTE • Waste Sediments/Sludges.SBS • Subsurface SolI Below Waste.B » Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).(3) Samples for SP-7 & SP-8 composited

with sample 245.

NOTES1. See Figure MM a-ifor waste





02/08/91

I

IIIIiiiiiiiiiiiii

3.5 GROUNDWATER

Sampling locations for groundwater are shown onFigure SUM 3-2.

To indicate the extent of groundwater contamination beneaththe site, Figure SUM 3-2A was developed, defining areas ofbenzene contamination. In addition, the extent of freeproduct (hydrocarbons) floating on the groundwater table isshown on Figure 3-2B. The floating product was measuredusing the Phase I wells and existing hydrocarbon recoverywells drilled by Stanley Engineering.

The results of the analyses of groundwater samples arediscussed on a well by well basis,, A summary of "hits" forgroundwater analyses is included in Table 3-4.Concentrations are compared to maximum contaminant levels(MCL) for drinking water only.

SBB-l

Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water. Concentration for lead (0.048 PPM)was just below the lead MCL for drinking water(0.050 PPM).

GC/MS - Analysis detected 0.026 PPM naphthalene and 0.006PPM 2-methylnaphthalene. Benzene (0.006 PPM) and1,2-dichhloroethane (0.036 PPM) were detected abovethe MCL's of 0.005 PPM and 0.005 PPM, respectively.

*. I* . I

0/HS - Analysis detected concentrations (0.126 PPM) of totjalhydrocarbons, toluene (0.015 PPM, estimated), andxylene (0.005 PPM, estimated).


SBB-2

Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water.

GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations of naphthalene(0.026 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (0.019 PPM), tolueneand xylene (0.003 PPM each). The benzene concentration(0.120 PPM) was above the MCL (0.005 PPM).

O/HS - Analysis detected benzene compounds (butyl,n-propyl) at low concentrations, however benzene wasdetected (0.24 PPM, estimated) above the MCL(.005 PPM). The hydrocarbon scan detected hydrocarbonsat 0.641 PPM.

8BB-3

Metals - Analysis detected chromium (.059 PPM) and lead(.075 PPM) at levels above the MCL's (.05 PPM each).

GC/MS & O/HS - All organics were below the analyticaldetection limits.

SBB-4

Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCL'sfor drinking water.

GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations of naphthalenecompounds (0.007 PPM), benzene (0.23 PPM), toluene(0.097 PPM), ethylbenzene (0.004 PPM), and xylene(0.013 PPM).

O/HS - Analysis detected hydrocarbons at concentrations of0.880 PPM.


I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

SBB-5

Metals - The concentrations of the metals were below thedrinking water MCLs.

GC/MS - Analysis detected 0.410 PPM naphthalene, 0.520 PPM2-methylnaphthalene, 0.022 PPM of PAHs, 0.048 PPMtoluene, 0.660 PPM xylene and 0.500 PPM ethylbenzene.Detected benzene (1.0 PPM) above the MCL (.005 PPM).

O/HS - Analysis detected 282.0 PPM of hydrocarbons in thegroundwater. Analysis was also conducted for freeproduct sample obtained from the well. Resultsindicated concentrations of benzene (416 PPM),ethylbenzene (3,310 PPM), toluene (58 PPM), and xylene(1,600 PPM).

SBB-6

Metals - The concentrations detected were below the MCLsfor drinking water.

• GC/MS - Analysis detected naphthalenes at low concentrationsand BTEX at concentrations of 1.6 PPM, 0.013 PPM, 0.270

I PPM, and 0.460 PPM, respectively, were detected. Thebenzene analysis (1.6 PPM) was above the MCL of 0.005PPM.

™ O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations of6.080 PPM.

ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-14 October 1990

8BB-7

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forchromium (.062 PPM) and lead (.064 PPM), both above MCL(.050 PPM each).

GC/MS — Very low concentrations toluene (0.003 PPM),ethylbenzene (0.006 PPM), and xylene (0.012 PPM) weredetected. The benzene concentration detected(0.039 PPM) was above the MCL (0.005 PPM).

O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of0.158 PPM.

SBB-8

Metals - Analysis detected an elevated concentration ofarsenic (0.121 PPM) above the MCL of 0.05 PPM.

GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations ofethylbenzene (0.002 PPM) and xylene (0.003 PPM). Thebenzene concentration detected (0.011 PPM) was abovethe MCL (0.005 PPM).

O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected in the hydrocarbonscan.

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forChromium (.055 PPM) and lead (.082 PPM), both above MCL(.050 PPM).

GC/MS & O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected in thehydrocarbon scan.


II SBB-10

• Metals - Analysis detected an elevated concentration of" beryllium (0.070 PPM).

P GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations of naphthalene-- . • (.074 PPM), 2-methylnaphthalene (.096 PPM), xylene

• (.21 PPM), and 2,4-dimethylphenol (0.076 PPM).

O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations of• 10.6 PPM.

BBB-11

| Metals - Elevated concentration was detected for arsenic(.204 PPM) which was above MCL (.05 PPM).

• GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentrations forethylbenzene (.001 PPM), and xylene (.002 PPM).

• Benzene (.009 PPM) was detected above MCL (.005 PPM).

_ O/HS - Hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of| 0.057 PPM.

ISBB-12

• Metals - Analysis detected metals at concentrations below_ the drinking water MCL's.

I " . - - ' - ' , 'GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds detected. .

- "" i

I

I

I ORC Superfund Site : Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-16 October 1990

I

SBB-13

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (1.119 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM); and chromium(.566 PPM) and lead (.234 PPM) both above MCL(.05 PPM).

GC/MS - Analysis detected concentrations for1,2-dichloroethane (.220 PPM) above MCL (.005 PPM) anddetected 0.002 PPM of 1,2-dichloropropane.


SBB-14

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (2.092 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM), and chromium(.251 PPM) and lead (.314 PPM) both above MCL(.05 PPM each).

GC/MS - Analysis detected low concentration for2-methylnaphthalene (.003 PPM) and xylene (.009 PPM).Analysis detected benzene (.210 PPM) above MCL(.005 PPM).


SBB-15

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentrations forbarium (1.544 PPM) above MCL (1.0 PPM); and detectedchromium (.071 PPM) and lead (.066 PPM) both above MCL(. 05 PPM). . .

GC/MS - Analysis detected naphthalene (.031 PPM),2-methylnaphthalene (.013 PPM) and xylene (.087 PPM).Analysis detected benzene (.054 PPM) above MCL(.005 PPM).



II SBB-16

O/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected during the hydrocarbonscan.

BBB-17

I Metals - Analysis detected metals at concentrations below* MCL's. Lead (0.048 PPM) was detected just below MCL_ (0.050 PPM).

GC/MS - Analysis detected xylene at a concentration of

1 0.002 PPM. Benzene was detected at a concentration of(0.004 PPM) below the MCL (.005 PPM).

I

I

Metals - Analysis detected arsenic (0.082 PPM) above the MCL. of 0.05 PPM.

GC/MS - Analysis detected 1,2-dichloroethane (.002 PPM) and• benzene (.002 PPM).

0/HS - No hydrocarbons were detected during the scan.

I

I

| chromium (.139 PPM) above MCL (.050 PPM).

I GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected... ' -• '/;

* IBB-3

£ Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.

• GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.

I ORC Superfund Site -Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-18 October 1990

I

IBB-2

Metals - Analysis detected elevated concentration for

IBB-4

Metals - No metals were detected at concentrations above theMCLs.

GC/MS 6 O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.

IBB-5


GC/MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.

MW-1


GC.MS & O/HS - No organic compounds were detected.

MW-2



MW-3




I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

RW-12 (STANLEY WELL)

Metals - Analysis indicated concentrations for arsenic(1.086 PPM), Chromium (0.335 PPM), lead (24.070 PPM),and zinc (0.106 PPM). EP Tox for lead was 24.070 PPM.

GC/MS & O/HS -- Concentrations for PAHs included2-methylnaphthalene (1,200 PPM), acenaphthalene(5.700 PPM), fluorene (8.900 PPM), and naphthalene(910 PPM). Benzene (13,000 PPM), toluene (15,000 PPM),ethylbenzene (96,000 PPM), and xylene (41,000 PPM) weredetected in the product. Styrene (24,000 PPM) was alsodetected. Concentrations for total hydrocarbons was38,500 PPM.

ORC Superfund Site -r Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-20 October 1990

TABLE 3-4

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSGROUNDWATER

SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate -

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberylliunchromiumcooperep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

XGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec • butv I benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluene ,xylene

GC/MS.PPM1,2-dichloroethane1.2-dichloropropane2, 4-di methyl phenol2-methylnaphthaleneacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulf ideethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrenestyrenetoluenexylene

IBB-2261

66.001848431.7010.501690725

0.06

0.14

0.01

IBB-3268

14410.002411

7.3023901537

0.06

0.01

0.06

IBB-4266

158

1941

8.0023701315

0.03

0.01

0.03

IB8-5263

92.0020510981.607.202270535

0.09

0.04

0.02

0.004 J

MM267

16241.00350

7.0024301290

0.03

0.05

HW-2264

16651.001392

7.101740800

0.05

0.07

0.008 J

0.003 B

MU-3260

112

1520

6.9020001340

0.04

0.02

0.005

RW-12160

1.09

0.34

24.0724.52

0.11

385005430 J1861 J

5546 J12450 J

12005.701100013000

960008.909000035000910

240001500041000

S8B-01272

7768692392

6.404150800

0.31

0.040.08

0.05

0.13

0.13

0.003 J

0.02 J0.005 J

0.04

0.006 J

0.0060.009 J

0.003 B

SBB-02269

69780.001696

6.701930535

0.89

0.030.05

0.030.07

0.640.24 J0.008 J0.003 J0.006 J

0.01 J

0.02

0.120.005 J

0.03

0.003 J0.003 J

LEGENDSBB-1 • Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 - Intermediate Bechtel Well.MU-1 - Mystery WelUInternediate well

by G&G water well construction).B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J » Indicates an estimated value.P - Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cn (field measurement).

NOTES1. See Figure tat a-J for groundwater

sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not


3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RU-12 and SBB-5 product samples.

4. Where a concentration is not shown,for EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.

02/08/91

IIIIIIIIII11IIililIilIIIIIIII


GRODNDWATER

SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS, PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbar innberyl linnchromiuncoooerep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGANICS I HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butvlbenzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPM1 .2-diehloroethane1 . 2-di ch loropropane2,4-dimethylphenot2-methylnBphthalene .acenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfideethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrenestyrenetoluenexylene

S8B-03259

27682.0021774.206.8025901393

0.78

0.060.16

0.08

0.070.15

S8B-04270

56633.001275

6.883180415

0.06

0.01

0.880.18 J0.01 J0.07 J0.01 J

0.02 J0.12 J0.17 J

0.002 J

0.23

0.004 J

0.005 J

0.100.13

SB8-05271

7671001177

6.701590285

0.16

0.01

2821.15 J30.20 J4.09 J20.20 J21.00 J

34.80 J

0.52

1.000.009 J

0.50

0.150.410.02

0.002 J

0.05 J0.66

SBB-05-PRODUCT262

0.64

41633104111420

170 J

3770

220

1200

73.00

58.001600

588-06274

99061.00Z153

6.8031801055

0.12

0.04

6.083.45 J0.35 J0.33 Jo.oe j

0.23 J0.83 J

0.07

1.60

0.27

0.02

0.130.46

888-07275

6021491569

6.902630880

0.61

0.060.06

0.06

0.070.16

0.04

0.006

0.003 J0.01

SBB-08276

36228621573.606.8032801180

0.120.11

0.020.01

0.03

0.01

0.002 J

0.003 J

888-09265

292

1421.308.00890273

0.34

0.060.05

0.08

0.080.16

SBB-10278

5704918744

5.6010160

0.07

0.710.61

10.60

1.41 J

0.19 J

0.22 J

0.080.10

0.07

0.21

S8B-11277

3494861539

7.0056502175

0.200.10

0.020.01

0.02

0.06

0.003 J

0.008 J

0.009

0.001 J

-

0.002 J

LEGENDSBB-1 - Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 - Intermediate Bechtel Well.MM - Mystery WellUnternediate well

by G&G water well construction).B « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P » Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field Measurement).

NOTES j1. See Figure KM >-J for grourduater



3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RU-12 and SBB-5 product samples.

•4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.

02/08/91


GRODNDWATER


INDICATOR PARAMETERS, PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NDH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl 1 ionchromiuncopperCD tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

XGANICS ft HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen-butvl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butyl benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPM1 ,2-dichloroethane1 . 2-di ch I oropropane2,4-dimethylphenol2-methylnaphthaleneacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfideethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketone.methylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthreneoyrenestyrenetoluenexylene

S8B-1227V

26112.0016900.906.602140155

0.08

0.01

0.03

S8B-13280

71732118771.706.8030401045

1.12

0.570.11

0.230.0008

O.'O0.27

0.100.02 J

0.07 J0.002 J

0.220.002 J

SBB-H281

72933.003201

6.602950985

2.09

0.250.25

0.310.00060.170.37

1.150.53 J0.01 J0.05 J0.01 J0.02 J

0.02 J0.04 J

0.003 J

0.21

0.009

S88-15282

772292909

6.702120263

1.54

0.070.12

0.07

0.080.18

2.350.18 J0.06 J0.06 J0.13 J0.11 J0.08 J

0.21 J

0.01

0.05

0.004

0.03

0.09

888-16283

42012321930.506.8030901195

0.18

0.030.02

0.050.0005

0.10

0.004 J

0.002

0.002 J

S8B-17284

4365892312

7.1050001370

0.080.17

0.030.04

0.030.05

0.002 J

0.002 J

IIIIIIII

LEGENDSBB-1 • Shallow Bechtel Well.IBB-1 • Intermediate Bechtel Well.MV-1 • Mystery Uell(Intermediate well

by C&C water well construction).B • Compound was found in ample

and associated blank.J B indicates on estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1> Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).

MOTES1. See Figure nu a-z for grounduater


shown, the compound was be lowthe detection limit.

3. Indicator Parameters not analyzedfor RW-12 and SBB-5 product samples.

4. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox Lead, the compound wasnot analyzed using EP Tox ExtractionProcedures.

02/08/91

IIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIII

3.6 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT

Sampling locations for surface water and sediments are shownon Figure SUM 3-3. A summary of "hits" for surface waterand sediment analyses is included in Table 3-5.

METALS

Surface water concentrations of barium and zinc are slightlyabove the background concentrations. Background data isfrom the most upgradient sample along Gladys Creek (sampleNo. 40). Barium is the only metal detected in all surfacewater samples.

Acid seep and caustic seeps (surface water) contain elevatedlevels of metals compared to background. Chromium and leadwere above the MCL for drinking water entering into GladysCreek, but were not detected in the creek (dilution ofmetals in solution). Arsenic was detected in the CausticSeep surface water samples, but was not detected ingroundwater samples.

The surface water and sediment samples downgradient of thesite (Sample Nos. 129 and 130 respectively) indicate metalconcentrations similar to background levels.

The Gladys Creek sediment sample show elevatedconcentrations for metals when compared to background.

ORC Superfund Site . Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-21 October 1990

GO/MS

II

The surface water in Gladys Creek contained phenol(0.015 PPM), 2,4-dimethylphenol (0.001 PPM), 2-methylphenol(0.010 PPM), and 4-methylphenol (0.020 PPM) downgradient ofthe caustic seep (sample No. 60). All other surface watersamples taken in Gladys Creek showed concentrations belowdetection limits. The surface water in the southerntributary of Gladys Creek (sample No. 92) contained2,4-dimethylphenol (0.014 PPM) only.

The sediments in Gladys Creek contained chloroform(0.089 PPM), pyrene (0.180 PPM), fluoranthene (0.170 PPM), •and chrysene (0.120 PPM) just below the Highway 277 bridge |(sample No. 44), 4-methylphenol (0.550 PPM) below thecaustic seep (sample No. 63), and xylene (0.140 PPM) and •2-methylnaphthalene (1.200 PPM) below the acid seep (sample •No. 125).

The surface water sample taken from one of the acid seepscontained 2-methylnaphthalene (0.150 PPM) and naphthalene —(0.077 PPM) (sample No. 98). The sediment sample taken from Ithe acid seep contained 2-methylnaphthalene (3.900 PPM) andnaphthalene (1.100 PPM) (sample No. 99). •

The surface water sample taken from the caustic seepcontained elevated levels of BTEX, phenols, chlorinated •phenols, and PAHs (sample No. 95). The sediment sample ™taken for the caustic seep also contained elevated levelsof BTEX, phenols, and PAHs (sample No. 96). I

I

I

I

IORC Superfund Site Revision 0 ISUMMARY PHASE I 3-22 October 1990 •

I

IIIII

IIilIIIIIIIIIIilII11IIIIIIIIII


SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENTS

SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiumchromiumcornerleadmercurynickelzinc

OR GAM I CS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPN2.4.5-trichlorophenol2.4-dimethylphenol2-chlorophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyJjhenolacetonebenzenechloroformethyl benzenef tuoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl isobutylketonenaphthalenephenol :pyrenetoluenexylene

ACIDRECOVERY AREASED125

51.00

5.705.60

5.3011.00

50.60

0.06 J

0.44 J

1.20

0.12 P

0.14

SU126

17731.0017781.207.6021401163

0.04

0.009

1

ACID SEEPSED99

59.00

8.205.608.30

7.0023.00

104

0.71 J

3.90

4.70 P

16.00 P

1.10

0.99

SU98

1.340.160.020.260.320.36

1.902.51

0.160.03 J0.04 J

0.02 J0.02 J

0.15

6.80

0.08

CAUSTIC SEEPSED96

11.0036.00

4.602.809.30

4.508.40

2.16

0.19 J

. 5.00

14.001.9021.00

96.00 P0.06

0.08

25.00 P

0.9817.00

0.280.61

SU95

0.770.25

0.030.030.05

0.040.06

1.28

0.08 J0.48 J0.009 J

0.07 J0.27 J0.37 J

0.0216.000.0751.000.1164.001.900.11

0.06

4.60

0.3132.00

0.370.46

DOUNSTREANGLADYS CREEKSED63

48.001.10

7.006.2012.00

4.2018.00

2.83

0.550.37 P

0.31 P0.12 P

SU60

14239.001600

7.8023401297

0.03

0.04

0.001

0.01

0.02

0.02

DRAINAGE DITCHSED39

205

30.0025.0032.00

14.00154

2.58

SU38

40643.00954

6.3026891229

0.10

0.03

0.05

0.02 J0.004 J0.007 J

0.007 J

0.040.13

0.01

0.050.07

LEGENDSU - Surface Uater.SED • Sediment.8 • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/cm (field measurement).

NOTES1. See Figure RBI J-J for surface

; water & sediment locations.2. Where a concentration is not


3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface water samplesonly. Indicator parameters were notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.

02/08/91

SABLE 3-5SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS


SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSDH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as Nt>H (1)specific conductance (2)sulfate

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl 1 inncadmiumchromiumcopperleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenen- butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetert-butvl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MSjPPM2.4.5-trichlorophenol2,4-dimethylphenol2-chlorophenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacetonebenzenechloroformethylbenzenef luoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl i soouty I ketonenaphthalenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

GLADYS CREEKCOUNTY ROADSED129

45.00

4.702.40

4.807.80

1.20

0.02 P

0.02 P0.02 P

SU130

19753.0016891.007.7022301207

0.09

0.01

0.007

GLADYSCREEK HWY 277SED44

99.00

11.0014.0017.00

8.7035.00

4.59

0.20 P

0.09

0.17

0.18

SU43

20810.0011890.806.8025051421

0.03

0.006

GLADYS CREEK PONDSED48

84.00

9.5039.0010.00

7.6030.00

5.72

0.26 P

0.30 P

sw47

20117.001162

7.0024591480

0.04

0.06

NU TRIBUTARYSED46

116

13.0027.0013.00

11.0029.00

4.42

0.58 J

0.26 J

0.05 P

0.08

0.02

SU45

22370.0012531.706.8028611445

0.02

SOUTHOF ACID SEEPSED54

115

12.0015.0020.000.418.6030.00

1.96

0.06 P

0.07 P

SU53

17025.001540

6.1021371314

0.05

0.02

LEGENDSU • Surface Water.SED - Sediment.B • Compound Mas found in sample

and associated blank.•1 * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard Unit (field measurement).(2) umhos/on (field measurement).

NOTES1. See Figure sot 9-9 for surface

water & sediment locations.2. Where a concentration is not


3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface Mater samplesonly. Indicator parameters Mere notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.

02/08/91

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII



SAMPLING LOCATIONSMEDIAOSOH SAMPLE NO.

INDICATOR PARAMETERS. PPMalkalinitychloridehardness, totalnitrite-nitrate as NPH (1)specific conductance (2)sulfete

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariunberylliumcadmiunchromiuncopperleadmercurynickelzinc

XGANICS t HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethyl benzenen-butyl benzenen-propyl benzenesec • but y I benzenetert-butyl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPM2.4.5-trichloroDhenol2,4-dimethylphenol2-ehloroohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacetonebenzenechloroformethyl benzenef luoranthenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridemethyl i sobuty I ketonenaphthalenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

SOUTH TRIBUTARYDOWNSTREAMSED93

120

17.009. BO17.000.379.5044.00

0.88

0.05 J

12.00 P

29.00 P0.38 P

SU92

19990.005000.808.601560480

0.04

0.03

0.01

UPSTREAMGLADYS CREEKSED41

49.00

4.7031.00

4.8013.00

2.00

SU40

195

1193

6.6023651426

0.03

AR-9SU100

0.370.77

0.120.060.61

0.150.25

0.13

0.002 J

0.007 J

0.002 J0.004 J0.003 J

0.31

11.00

5.20

0.1 3

LEGENDSU - Surface Water.SED • Sediment.B • Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.(1) Standard unit (field measurement).(2) unhos/cn (field measurement).

NOTES1. See Figure HM »-» for surface

uater i sediment locations.2. Uhere a concentration is not


3. Analysis for indicator parametersperformed for surface water samplesonly. Indicator parameters were notanalyzed for the caustic seep andacid seep samples.

02/08/91

3.7 SURFACE SOIL

II

Sampling locations for surface soil are shown on IFigure SUM 3-4. A summary of "hits" for surface soilanalyses is included in Table 3-6. A general discussion of"hot" spots is discussed below. I

IMETALS

Tank Farm Areas - Surface soil samples (sample No. 's 104, I105, 106, 107, 110, and 112) in the tank farm diked areasin general indicated elevated levels for all metals. Lead, •chromium, and arsenic typically had the highest •concentrations. The result of EP Tox tests indicated metalsare not leaching at concentrations considered to be toxic I(>5 PPM). *

Cooling Towers - Surface soil (sample No. 101) from the cooling •towers area had elevated concentrations for all metals.Chromium (241 PPM), arsenic (13 PPM), and mercury (9.5 PPM) _were significantly higher than background concentrations. IEP Tox for chromium (0.016 PPM) was less than the toxiccharacteristic of 5 ppm. •

Old Storage Pits - Two samples (sample No. 's 114 & 117) werecollected in the Old Storage Pits area. Sample No. 114 •showed elevated concentrations for arsenic (13 PPM), barium •(144 PPM), chromium (39 PPM), copper (316 PPM), lead(123 PPM), mercury (2.6 PPM) and zinc (140 PPM). Sample •No. 117 showed elevated concentration for barium (104 PPM), •chromium (72 PPM), lead (31 PPM), and zinc (33 PPM).

I

I

IOP.C Superfund Site ~ Revision 0 ISUMMARY PHASE I 3-23 October 1990 •

I

IIIII1III

I

D

01I1

Leaded Gasoline Tank Storage Area - Surface sample No. 102showed slightly elevated or elevated concentrations for allmetals. The concentrations were arsenic (6.8 PPM), barium(99 PPM), chromium (17 PPM), copper (84 PPM), lead (74 PPM),and zinc (55 PPM). Sample No. 103 showed slightly elevatedor elevated concentrations of arsenic (33 PPM), barium(148 PPM), chromium (39 PPM), lead (226 PPM), mercury(0.59 PPM), and zinc (75. PPM). EP Tox for lead detected aconcentration of 0.051 PPM. Sample No. 104 showed elevatedconcentrations of arsenic (56 PPM), barium (1446 PPM), lead(1028 PPM), mercury (9.9 PPM), and zinc (54 PPM) and EP Toxfor lead (1.028 PPM). Sample No. 108 showed elevated orslightly elevated concentrations of barium (335 PPM) andchromium (18 PPM). Sample No. 109 showed elevated orslightly elevated concentrations of arsenic (18 PPM), barium(237 PPM), and lead (19 PPM).

North of South Pond System - Sample No. 113 showed slightlyelevated concentrations for chromium (15 PPM), lead(22 PPM), and zinc (22 PPM).

South of Land Treatment Unit - Sample No. 120 indicatedslightly elevated concentrations for barium (120 PPM),chromium (24 PPM), lead (17 PPM), and zinc (27 PPM).

Acid Recovery Area - Sample No. 116, taken near Stanley WellAR-3, indicated slightly elevated concentrations for lead(17 PPM) and mercury (0.29 PPM).

Crude Off-Loading Area - Sample No. 127 located just north ofHighway 277 indicated concentrations at background levels.

Old Refinery Process Area - Two samples (sample No. 's 118 &119) were collected. Sample No. 118_indicated elevatedconcentrations for copper (240 PPM), mercury (5 PPM), lead(46 PPM), cadmium (0.50 PPM), and zinc (66 PPM). Sample No.119 indicated elevated concentrations for cadmium(1.3 PPM), chromium (38 PPM), copper (59 PPM), lead(71 PPM), mercury (1.47 PPM), and zinc (61 PPM).

East of Sludge Trap #1 - Sample No. 11 indicated an elevatedconcentration for lead of 55 PPM.

ORC Superfund Site * Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-24 October 1990

6C/M8 & 0/HS

In general contamination of organics within the surface soilsamples were in very low concentrations at most samplinglocations. "Hot" spots are discussed in the followingparagraphs.

Inside of Tank 177 Diked Area - Sample No. 106 indicated anelevated concentration for phenols. This surface soilsample detected 2-methylphenol at a concentration of 84 ppin.This sample was obtained from soil that appeared to havebeen transported from another area of the site. Sample #107contained elevated concentrations of PAHs and a totalhydrocarbon scan of 192 PPM.

Crude Off-Loading Area North of U.S. Highway 277 - Chlorinatedhydrocarbons were detected in sample No. 127.Concentrations for 1,1-dichloroethylene (0.055 PPM),chlorobenzene (0.073 PPM), and trichloroethylene(0.089 PPM) were found.


III


SURFACE SOILS


INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS, PPMarsenicbar inncadmiumchromiumcoppereo tox arsenicep tox -chromiuneo tox leadep tox mercuryleadmercurvnickelzinc

ORGANICS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenexylene

GC/MS.PPN1.1-diehloroethylene2.4-dimethylphenol2-methyl phenol2-methy I naphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebenzpia)pyrenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrysenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

ACIDRECOVERYAREA116

47.00

5.508.40

17.000.293.709.80

1.24

0.08 P

COOLINGTOUER101

13.00206

24154.00

0.02

52.009.5015.00176

1.26

0.02 P

0.03 P

CRUDEOFF-LOADAREA .127

46.00

9.6013.00

6.70

7.4016.00

46.40

2.34 J5.51 J

0.06

0.81

0.07

0.07

0.03 P0.02 P

0.45

0.070.10

EAST OFSLUDGETRAPS111

8.00109

13.0017.00

55.00

9.6024.00

2.40

0.02 P

0.02 P0.02 P

LEADED GASOLINE TANKS102

6.8099.00

17.0084.00

74.000.2513.0055.00

0.49

0.02 P

0.04 P

103

33.00148

39.0029.00

0.05

2260.5914.0075.00

0.37

0.12 P

3.500.66 P

0.02 P

0.61

104

56.001446

16.0035.00

2.74

10289.9012.0054.00

0.60

0.02 P

0.03 P

108

335

18.0040.00

13.00

11.0030.00

2.83

0.91 J

0.02 P

0.27 B

0.02 P0.02 P

109-.18.00237

12.0020.00

19.00

20.0021.00

15.50

0.11 J

0.02 P

0.10 B

0.02 P0.02 P

N. OFS. PONDSYSTEM113

76.00

15.0024.00

22.00

7.7022.00

1.04

0.02 P

0.03 P

l

iii

LEGENDB • Compound was found in sample

and associated blankJ • Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant

NOTES1. See Figure m S-4 for surface

soil sample locations2. Where • concentration is not

shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit

3. Whe' a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91


SURFACE SOILS


INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumcaotauumchromiuncoppereo tox arsenicec tox chromiumep tox leadep tox mercuryleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGANICS 1 HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethvl benzenexylene

SC/MS.PPM1,1-dichloroethylene2,4-dimethylphenol2-methyl phenol2-methvln8Dhthalene4-methvl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzene :benzo(a)pyrenebis(2-ethvlhexyl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrysenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenejhenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexylene

NORTHU.S.277124

81.00

12.0013.00

10.00

7.6017.00

2.92

0.02 P

OLDSTORAGE PIT AREA1H

13.00144

39.00316

1232.6018.00140

0.32

0.05 P

0.60 B

0.04 P

117

104

72.0019.00

31.00

10.0033.00

3.57

0.16 J

1.00 P

0.05 P

REFINERY AREA118

18.000.5114.00240

46.005.004.7066.00

9.47

0.65 J1.08 J

0.65 P

0.09

0.490.09

0.05 P

1.40

119

65.001.3038.0059.00

71.001.477.40

61.00

0.44

0.05 P

S. OFIftHP

TREATNHT120

120

24.0019.00

17.00

9.1027.00

1.41

0.04 P

TANK FARM105

21.00200

26.0056.00

3.42

11191.2115.0079.00

0.54

0.02 P

1.10 P

0.008 P

0.43

106

65.00258

149522

0.050.49

2942.5925.00378

0.33

16084.00

930

0.11 P

4.20 P

0.08 P0.03 P

1400

107

185

13.0053.00

15.00

13.0029.00

192137 J137 J275 J

10.00

0.310.05 P0.04

0.420.86

0.111.10

0.04 P

3.401.50

0.15

0.32

110

124

16.0029.00

31.00

9.8026.00

3.02

0.52 B

0.02 P0.02 P

LEGENDB B Compound was found in sample

and associated blankJ * Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant

NOTES1. See Figure sou 1-4 for surface

soil sample locations2. Where a concentration is not

shown, the conpound was belowthe detection limit

3. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

ITABLE 3-6

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE SOILS


I MOO CAM 1C PRIORITY POLLUTAKTS.PPMarsenicbar inncadmiifi)chromiincoooereo tox arsenicCD tox chromiumCD tox leadep tox mercury -leadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS t HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzeneethylbenzenexvlene

EC/MS. PPM1 . 1 -dichloroethylene2,4-dimethylohenol2-methyl phenol2-methylnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphtheneacetonebenzenebenzo(e)pyrenebis(Z-ethylhexvl) phthalatechlorobenzenechrvsenedibenzofurandiethylphthalatedimethylphthalateethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenetrichloroethylenexvlene

TAHKFARM112

236149

20.0015.003.89

32.00

13.0032.00

2.71

0.15 P

0.04 P

AREAHEARSUMPS62

70.003101.60184533

o.oa0.410.0062506.1030.00401

3.57

0.46 J

200160

1800

3200

REDSTAINAREA1

21.00180

10.008.50

45.00

10.0019.00

1601700

5400

33.00 P

95.00 P

4200

[IIIil(IIIililIIIIIIIIIII

LEGENDB » Conpound was found in cample

end associated blankJ « Indicates an estimated valueP • Possible lab contaminant

NOTES1. See Figure HM 1-4 for surface

soil sample locations2. Where a concentration is not

shown, the compound was belowthe detection limit

3. Where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the conpoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91

8BB-2

8BB-3

SUMMARY PHASE I 3-26 October 1990

113.8 SUBSURFACE SOILS

Subsurface soil samples were collected during the Jconstruction of monitoring wells. Selected samples wereanalyzed. Table 3-7 summarizes the analytical data obtained •that indicates "hits". (Note: Subsurface soil sampling •associated with the waste sources is summarized in Section3.2). Subsurface soil locations are shown on Figure ISUM 3-2. •

SBB-1

Sample No. 30 from a sandy clay stratum overlying a gypsum |layer contained 261 ppm of total hydrocarbons. Thiscontaminated zone appeared to be "perched" above the gypsumand Rush Springs sandstone.

Two samples (sample Nos. 33 and 34) were collected from anorganic clay layer overlying the Rush Springs sandstone.Sample No. 34 contained slight concentrations for totalhydrocarbons (13.3 PPM) at depth of 21 feet. Slight tracesof PAHs and total hydrocarbons (8 PPM) were detected insample No. 33 at a depth of 6 to 9 feet. I

I

ITwo samples (sample No. 's 36 & 37) of silty clay contained •trace amounts of hydrocarbons of 4.02 and 3.48 PPM |respectively. Concentrations decreased slightly with depth.

ISBB-4

Gypsum outcrop layer overlying sandstone stratum was notsampled. No organic vapors were detected during drilling •operations. |

ORC Superfund Site Revision 0 ICTTMM1TJV TJHaCT? T t-")K. r»r"*-r>Kor- I Q O n •

I

[I(Ill1 1llll1 1ll1 1I

SBB-5

Two samples (sample Nos. 58 & 59) were obtained from aweakly cemented zone of the Rush Springs sandstone betweendepth of 10 to 15 feet. The uppermost sample (No. 55)contained total hydrocarbons concentration of 4,140 PPM andlow concentrations of PAHs. Concentrations decrease withdepth to 3.130 PPM in sample No. 59. (It should be notedthat free product was found in the monitoring well installedin the bore hole.)

8BB-6

Sample No.64, obtained from 0 to 2 feet and sample No. 65,obtained at a depth of 6 to 8 feet from a silty clay layeroverlying gypsum, contained slight traces of totalhydrocarbons (1.68 PPM and 3.27 PPM, respectively).

SBB-7

Sample No. 67, obtained in the uppermost zone of a saturatedsilty sand zone (9 to 11 feet deep), contained very slighttrace of hydrocarbons (0.920 PPM).

ll SBB-8

Four samples (sample Nos. 68, 69, 70, and 71) were obtained* from depths of 0 to 40 feet in alluvial soils overlying the

Rush Springs sandstone. All samples contained slight traces(<2 PPM) of hydrocarbons. . .'

I 8BB-9

1

I

Sample No. 86, obtained from a weathered portion of the RushSprings sandstone (3-5 feet depth), contained slight tracesof total hydrocarbons (0.858 PPM).


SBB-10

Five samples (sample Nos. 77, 78, 79, BO, and 81) wereobtained from silty clay/clay alluvial soils overlying theRush Springs sandstone. Concentrations for hydrocarbonswere detected in all five samples. The highestconcentration was detected in sample No. 78 (3-5 foot depth)at 292 PPM and decreased with depth with lowestconcentration (0.360 PPM) in sample No. 81 (35-37 footdepth). Slight traces (<1 PPM) of phenols were detected insample Nos. 79 and 80 between depth of 10 to 20 feet belowthe ground surface.

SBB-ll

Three samples (sample Nos. 82, 83, and 84) were obtainedfrom a clay stratum overlying the Rush Spring sandstone toa depth of 27 feet. Each sample contained slight traces(<4 PPM) of hydrocarbons.

SBB-12

A shallow surfical sample (0-2 feet) indicated trace(0.833 PPM) concentration of hydrocarbons.

8BB-13

Four samples (sample Nos. 132, 133, 134, and 135) wereobtained from alluvial soils (sand/clay) overlying the RushSprings sandstone. The surface soil (sample No. 132)indicated no hydrocarbon contamination. The three deepersamples all contained concentrations of hydrocarbons between2 to 3 PPM.

8BB-14

Two samples (sample Nos. 137 and 138) were obtained from aclay stratum overlying a thick (9.5 feet) gypsum layer.Concentrations for hydrocarbons were <1 PPM for each sample.

ORC Superfund Site 'Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-28 October 1990

III1111IIII11III

ilI

il1I

SBB-15

Six samples (sample Nos. 139 through 144) were obtained froma 20 foot thick clay layer overlying the Rush Springssandstone. The four deepest samples containedconcentrations for hydrocarbons of 2.81 PPM (No. 141),542 PPM (No. 142), 483 PPM (No. 143), and 990 PPM (No. 144).

SBB-16

Two samples (sample Nos. 170 and 171) were obtained from agravelly sandy clay fill, 9 feet deep, overlying a verythick (31.5 feet) sequence of gypsum. Sample No. 170 showed20.1 PPM hydrocarbons and sample No. 171 showed 6.27 PPM forhydrocarbons. A black oily substance was encountered at adepth of 12 feet within the gypsum. Organic vapor analysiswith HNu read volatile concentrations of 1.5 to 2.0 PPMemanating from the drill fluid pit.

BBS-17

Sample No. 198 from 3-5 foot depth showed traceconcentration (0.027 PPM) for hydrocarbons.

IBB-2 & IBB-3

No subsurface soil samples were taken. (See SBB-3 andSBB-11, respectively, for shallow soil conditions.)

IBB-4

Four samples (sample Nos. 152, 153, 156, and 158) wereobtained from the alluvial soils overlying the Rush Springssandstone. All samples showed trace amounts ofhydrocarbons. The highest concentration was 19 PPM at adepth of 27 feet (sample No. 152) and the lowest was 0.52PPM at a depth of 37 feet (sample No. 158). In additiontrace amounts of phenols and PAHs were detected in samplesNos. 156 and 158.

IBB-S

No concentrations of organic contamination were detected.

ORC Superfund Site • Revision 0SUMMARY PHASE I 3-29 October 1990

TABU: 3-7SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

SUBSURFACE SOILS

SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSOH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH. feet

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumchromiumcopperep tox -chromiumep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS ft HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethylbenzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

EC/MS. PPM2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methvlnaDhthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethylbenzenefluorene .methyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

IB8-4-11523-5

67.00

8.408.30

5.70

6.6013.00

19.00

0.02 B

0.03 B

IBB-4-215312-14

107

9.809.90

7.10

9.6016.00

5.90

0.28 P

0.02

IBB-4-315625-27

69.00

6.906.00

6.4012.00

7.82

1

3.40

4.90

6.30

0.26 B

0.01 B

0.06 P

3.10

0.050.09

IB8-4-415835-37

19.00

4.201.50

3.607.60

0.52

1.50

2.40

3.20

0.21 B

1.60 B

0.06 P

2.00

0.010.02

IBB-5-11800-2

135

17.007.20

11.00

10.0026.00

0.02 P

SSB-0130

9-10.5

203

17.0044.00

17.00

'6.0032.00

261

5.20 J16.10 J

9.98 J

17.00

4.72

7.12

67.69 P

9.80

15.03

S8B-02-1336-9

2041.1014.0025.00

15.00

'4.00•5.00

8.00

1.52 J

4.14

0.10

0.46

0.481.37

S8B-02-234

18-21

108

7.6016.00

8.00

6.8014.00

13.30

2.57 J

0.51

S8B-03-1360-2

120

13.0019.00

14.00

9.7026.00

4.02

1.15 J

0.30 J

0.07 P

S8B-03-2379-11

359

16.0053.00

15.00

15.0032.00

3.48

1.11 J

0.05 P

0.04 P

LEGENDB « Compound was found in sample

and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P • Possible lab contaminant.

NOTES1. See Figure BOH *-> for subsurface

soil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not


3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3.


02/08/91

III1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

TABLE 3-7

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTSSUBSURFACE SOILS

SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH. fe«t

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberylliumchromiumcoppereo tox chromium

. eo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

ORGAN I CS 1 HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchtordane, trans isomerethyl benzenesec-butyibenzenetoluenexylene

GC/NS.PPN2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2-methylnaphthalene4-tnethyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethyl benzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

S88-05-158

10-11

u.oo3.6029.00

6.5013.00

4140279 J

74.20 J

498 J

17.00

0.36 P0.072.20

2.20

0.31 P

14.000.72

0.120.520.67

SBB-05-259

13- H

3.00

3.408.40

6.3011.00

3.13

0.24 P

0.30 P0.13 P

S8B-06-1640-2

101

11.0020.00

10.00

8.3023.00

1.68

0.330.25 P

0.34 P0.14 P

S88-06-2656-8

142

14.0016.00

11.00

13.0029.00

3.27

0.02 P

S88-07-1660-2

117

13.0012.00

9.60

10.0023.00

1.90

0.02 P

0.03 P

S88-07-2679-11

68.00

6.408.40

6.4014.00

0.92

0.02 P

SBB-08-1680-2

105

10.0023.00

0.281700.6511.0041.00

0.90

0.03 P

0.04 P

S88-08-2693-5

107

4.6010.00

7.40

0.64

0.05 P

0.05 P

S8B-08-370

12-H

82.00

7.0054.00

22.00

0.99

0.05 P

0.04 P

SBB-08-471

40-42

96.00

12.0019.00

9.70

9.7021.00

1.94

0.22 P

0.09 P

•>

LEGENDB • Compound was found in •ample

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P * Possible lab contaminant.

MOVES1. See Figure •» J-2 for subsurface

•oil sample locations.2. Where a concentration is not




02/08/91


SUBSURFACE SOILS

SAMPLING LOCATIONSOSDH SAMPLE NO.DEPTH, feet

INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl 1 innchromiumcoppereo tox-Chramutiep tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

DRGANICS A HS.PPMhydrocarbon scanbenzenech I ordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethv I benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

GC/HS.PPN2,4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyLJ)henol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethylbenzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneohenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

SBB-0986S-5

7.90

3.1015.00

4.709.80

0.86

0.06 P

0.02 P

S8B-10-1770-2

69.00

1.4016.00

6.40

2.80

5.50

0.07 P

S88-10-2783-5

85.00

19.0012.00

5.60

5.4011.00

292

0.02

0.17 P

0.05 P

0.26

S88-10-379

12- 14

66.00

7.407.40

8.5023.00

53.90

0.34 J

0.42 J

0.05

0.46

0.84 P

0.17 P

0.22

SBB-10-480

15-17

132

8.3014.00

6.80

11.0018.00

0.29

0.02

0.18

0.46 P

0.11 P

0.01

S88-10-581

35-37

70.00

8.5015.00

6.40

8.2018.00

0.36

0.25 P

0.07 P

SBB-11-1820-2

85.00

9.009.50

7.50

7.5015.00

3.701.46 J

0.14 J

0.02 P

2.00 P

0.02 P

S8B-11-2839-11

178

8.8070.00

8.70

11.0025.00

0.59

0.06 P

0.04 P0.04 P

S88-11-384

25-27

83.00

7.3017.00

6.50

6.9015.00

1.62

0.03 P

0.03 P0.02 P

S8B-12880-2

142

13.0023.00

10.00

9.6021.00

0.83

0.02 P


and associated blank.J « Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.

NOTES1. See Figure tat 9-2 for subsurface





02/08/91

EIIIIIIIEIEEIEIII


SUBSURFACE SOILS


INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbar innberyl Hunchrotniune<>ppereo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynz

ekelnc

DRGANICS I HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cfs isomerchlordane. trans \ sanerethyl benzenesec-butylbenzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPM2 4-dimethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl phenol2- methylnaphthalene4-tnethvl Dhenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracene -benzenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulf idechloroformethylbenzenefluorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthaleneDhenanthrenephenolovrenetoluenexylene - . .

S8B-13-11320-2

28.00224

302499.000.370.158063.0514.00512

0.02 P

5.60 P

0.001

0.001 B0.02 P

SBB-13-21339-11

96.00

12.0019.00

6.40

9.0022.00

2.32

0.010.0070.005

0.02 P

0.02 B0.02 B

SBB-13-313415-17

60.00

6.407.70

5.70

6.4014.00

2.57

0.58 P

0.02 B0.02 B

SB8-13-413530-32

90.00

3.904.70

5.8011.00

2.89

0.10 P

0.06 P0.05 P

S8B-14-11373-5

132

16.0017.00

19.00

11.0025.00

0.07

0.44

0.02 B

1.60

S8B-14-21386-8.5

1051.2022.0055.00

18.000.2918.0038.00

0.04

0.01 P

0.01 P0.02 B

SBB-15-11390-2

154

15.0016.00

12.00

9.5020.00

0.04 P

SBB-15-21406-8

63.00

11.0019.00

9.20

12.0021.00

0.04 P

0.03 B

588-15-31419-11

209

13.0018.00

9.50

13.0026.00

2.81

0.59 J

0.02 J0.74 J

0.11 P

0.03 B

SBB-15-414212-14

189

10.0023.00

7.00

13.0023.00

542

140 J

188 J

0.33

8.60 P

2.60

32.00 P0.52 P0.71

6.30

LEGENDB • Compound was found in sanple

and associated blank.J * Indicates an estimated value.P « Possible lab contaminant.

NOTES1. See Figure mat 1-2 for subsurface



3. No sample taken for SBB-4,IBB-2, and IBB-3. .

4. where a concentration is not shownfor EP Tox compounds, the compoundwas not analyzed using EP ToxExtraction procedures.

02/08/91


SUBSURFACE SOILS


INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. PPMarsenicbariumberyl Hunchromiumeoooereo tox chromiumeo tox leadleadmercurynickelzinc

3RGANICS I HS.PPNhydrocarbon scanbenzenechlordanechlordane. cis isomerchlordane, trans isomerethyl benzenesec - butyl benzenetoluenexylene

GC/MS.PPM2,4-dtmethylphenol2-hexanone2-methyl jhenol2-methylnaphthalene4-methyl phenolacenaphthyleneacetoneanthracenebenzenebis(Z-ethylhexyl) phthalatecarbon disulfidechloroformethyl benzenef luorenemethyl ethyl ketonemethylene chloridenaphthalenephenanthrenephenolpyrenetoluenexylene

S8B-15-5U315-17

2521.0014.0026.00

8.70

17.0029.00

483

95.20 J

180 J

9.00 P

1.20

33.00 P0.52 P

3.30

S88-15-614418-20

189

21.00142

4.80

25.0036.00

990

221 J

326 J

0.38

9.90 P

0.50 P

2.80

33.00 P1.20 P0.83

7.60

S88-16-11700-2

.137

8.8039.00

5.80

9.6023.00

20.10

1.16 J

0.86 J2.52 J

0.08 P0.008 P

S8B-16-21710-2

69.00

9.707.10

5.70

7.8014.00

6.27

0.15 P0.005 P

SBS-17-11983-5

199

13.0038.00

16.000.2513.0025.00

0.03

0.07 P

0.09 B0.02 B


and associated blank.J • Indicates an estimated value.P » Possible lab contaminant.

NOTES1. See Figure toot s-2 for subsurface


shoun, the compound was belowthe detection limit.



02/08/91

ASPHALTDRUM

OLDCAUSTIC «STORAGE X

PITS /

LIME SODASTORAGE

PITS I

SAMPLE UOCATION3

inrOMUTION HCHCOM USCD UPON rHOTOOIU^HTDATKO &•!-•» AS rattflOCO «T TH( OKLAHOMAITHI KMHTUIIT W WALTH.

' ORC SUPERFUNO SITEimtftiVM MVEnNumN / FCAnaiurr amor

OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

BfCHTEL INC.NOUITOM. TCIUO

'LINu LOCATIONS rGWASTf SOURCES

i

OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE

PITS /

•"*•• MYSTERY WELL LOCATIONS

.IUI SAMPLE NUMBERSIHTOMUTHN H1MM MSCO UPON FHOTOOIUPHVMICO 5-S-MA1FKWIOCO if THC OBUMOMAtUTI KMHTMtNT Of Mf ALTH.

^MSOIL FARMI II,-. iva,|

|V____/l^Vji ORC SUPERFUND SITE

NCIOOUU. MVESTKUTIOH I FEA8IB1UTY STUDY

CTML.

OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE

PITS /

LIME SODASTORAGE

PITS I. SHALLOW MONITORING WELL-SS8-8 LOCATIONS(O.OII) laOIII-BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS

IN PPM

KETf TO CONCENTRATIONS

L\N < 0.008 PPM

O.O09-O090 PPM

>aoooppMIMTOMaTION KIKON MUOUKN PHOTOORAPMVDAT 10 9-»-«3ASP*OVlCeD »T THC OKUkMQMA•T*Tt KNUlTHCNr Of KtALTH.

OJIVHIC KALI2OO 400

ORC SUPERFUND SITE

HfHfffl^l MVfSTUATION / FCASlBUJn STUDY

Ct»*. OKLAHOMA


BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

HOUSTON, 1CIAI

nn*B£NZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION

FIGURE SUM »-2A

wvyo

OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE

PITS /

LIME SODASTORAGE

PITS I

.4

NOTES

AREAS WHERE FREE HYDROCARBONPRODUCT WAS DETECTED, JULY 1900

UtfOHMATIOH HCMOM MSCO UPON 9OAF ID »'»'«3Al*tOVIOeO »V THE OKLAHOMA•TATC OtMHTMNT Of MALTH.

••AtHIC KAIK

«00 «QO

ORC SUPEflFUND SITERCUtOUL MVESTMATIOM / FEAStBIUTY STUDY

CTM, OKLAHOMA


BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.HOuaiON. TIKA*

c HYDRJMM. tMamtttn. | •«¥/&*?!

FIGURE SUM 5-20 KVTW

OLDCAUSTIC <STORAGE X

^PITS /I6O.63), ..../

AO2.89I

LIME SOOASTORAGE

PITS '.

\"V

029,13014Al Gtodys Crt«k And Countr Roodin HIM SOMH rc» F

SEDIMENT/SURFACE WATERSAMPLE LOCATIONS

(82,891 SAMPLE NUMBERS

MFORMATKW MMM MSCO UfOH mOTDQAAPMTMHO 5-j-«j»«rnovmeo tr rmo«L«HO««•TATI «nWTMCMT Of MCALTH.

ORC SUPERFUNO SITEnrarniM WYESIIQATIOM / m&etun snnt

CTAa. OKiAHOMA


BECHTU. ENVinONHEffTAL, INC.HOMIOH. TUA«

mil

FKURE SUM 9-9

s.

OLDCAUSTICSTORAGE

PITS /

•(120) SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS

HCMCOW MSCD UPON PHOTOGRAPHYMTKD 8- 1-9S M PMOVIOEO •* THE OKLAHOMA•TATI DtPMflltMr Or WALTH.

ORC SUPERFUND SITEBIt*fn*' MVf9TIOATIOH / FEASIBIUTT STUDY

OKLAHOMA


BCCHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL, IMC.

1IiIIIIIII1IIiit

4.0 GROUNDWATER

This section presents a brief summary of existing site wellevaluation, groundwater data, and Rush Springs aquifer dataobtained during Phase I field activities.

Prior to beginning Phase* I field activities, the existing sitewells were evaluated using geophysical borehole logging. Of the 78existing site wells, 50 were geophysically logged. The results andinterpretation of this activity were presented in TechnicalMemorandum I, February 1, 1990. To further evaluate the usefulnessof existing site wells, six wells were video logged during thebeginning of Phase I field activities. The existing wells wereuseful in helping determine site stratigraphy. They are of limiteduse for determining groundwater levels as most are slotted from orabove the ground surface to the bottom of the well.

Seventeen shallow wells and four intermediate wells wereconstructed during Phase I. Geologic logs are attached as AppendixA and monitoring well construction reports are attached as AppendixB. The boreholes of sixteen of the shallow wells and all four ofthe intermediate wells were geophysically logged prior to wellconstruction.

Tests to determine hydraulic conductivity in the Rush Springsaquifer were conducted in eight shallow monitoring wells and fourintermediate monitoring wells. Both slug and pump out tests wereperformed. The results of those tests are presented on Table i4-1. ; " ' • ' • :

The last set of groundwater measurements was made in mid-July 1990.Contour elevations based on these measurements are presented inFigure SUM-5. The general direction of groundwater flow across thesite is to the southeast. Groundwater gradient is 0.012. Based onaverage hydraulic conductivity of 2.0 X 10"'* cm/sec and an effectiveporosity of 0.30, the rate of groundwater flow across the site isapproximately 8 feet per year.

ORC Superfund Site 'Revision 1SUMMARY PHASE I 4-1 February 1, 1991

TABLE 4-1

HYDRAULIC CONDTJCTTVTTY TEST DATA

WELL NUMBER

SBB-1

SBB-2

SBB-3

SBB-6

SBB-11

SBB-15

SBB-16

SBB-17

IBB-2

IBB-3

IBB-4

IBB-5

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY CM/SEC

5.1 X 10-4

6.7 X 10-4

1.0 X 10-4

6.7 X 10-5

1.6 X 10-4

2.5 X 10

2.5 X 10'

-4

1.4 X 10•4

3.5 X 10-4

3.3 X 10-4

7.6 X 10-5

2.9 X 10-4

ORC Superfund SiteSUMMARY PHASE I


QUOCAUSTICSTORAGE

PITS /

LIME SODASTORAGE

PITS 1.NOTES

SELECTED STANLEY WELLS INOT SHOWN)WOK ALSO USEO TO PRODUCE CONTOURS.

6ROONOWATEH ELEVATIONMEASURED IN WELL

•"•-• MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONSIN FEET MSL, JULY I98O

INfMMATMM MCRCON BAUD UPON POATCO 9-S-«9ABMOVtOCO •» THC OKLAHOMA•TATI OlfWITMCHT Of HEALTH.

OUAPHIC SCALEtoo 4OO •<»

ORC SUPERFUNO SITEHEHEC4AL WVESTUATIOH I FEASIBILITY 8TUOT

Ctm. OKLAHOMA


BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.

HOUSTON. TEXAS

'"fcROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS

FKUHE SUM 4-1

5.O QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE

Table 5-1 contains a list of the trip, field, and sampling/deconequipment blanks that were collected during the Phase I samplingactivities at the ORC site. The table also contains the laboratoryblanks (instrument and method blanks) that were run during labanalyses of the ORC samples. Each blank was listed by its SELnumber and categorized by the following parameters:

Type of blank- field- trip- laboratory

• Analytical tests run on the blank- priority pollutant volatile organics- priority pollutant base/neutral/acid extractableorganics

• Chemical contaminant concentrations detected in theblanks

• SEL numbers of the ORC samples which were analyzedwith each blank

This information will be used to determine whether the chemicalconstituents detected in the ORC samples represent sitecontaminants, or were introduced during sampling, shipment oranalytical procedures.


CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS FOUND IN BLANKS(LAB, TRIP, EQUIPMENT BLANKS)

ORC11/19/90

SELNUMBER

1799871B0294180295160303180311180312180320180328180329180337180361180362180739180743180886180887181323181345181346181366181367181577181578181579181897

181898

181980181981181982181983181984181993181994182029182033182419182427182434182459182460182568182569

183343183344

TYPEBLANKFIELDFIELDTRIPTRIPFIELDTRIPTRIPFIELDTRIPTRIP

LAB(SED)LAB(LIQ)

TRIPLABTRIPLABTRIPTRIPFIELD

LAB(SED)LAB(LIQ)

TRIPLAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)

EQUIP

EQUIP

TRIPTRIPTRIPTRIPFIELD

LAB(SED)LABJ.IQ)EQUIP

LABTRIPFIELDTRIP

LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)

TRIPLAB

TRIPEQUIP

vocANALYSIS

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

YES

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

YESYES

BNAANALYSIS

YESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYESNO

YESNONONO

YESYESNOYESYESYES

YES

NONONONONOYESNONOYESNONONO

YESYESNO

YES

NONO

CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTSCONCENTRATION (UG/L)

ND11.0 Methylene chloride9.0 Methylene chloride

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

2.0 chloroform4.0 dichlorobromomethane5.0 chlorodibromomelhane

4.0 bromoform57 barium24 copper2130 zinc

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

. NDNDNDND

260.0 bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateNDND

SAMPLE NOS.REFERENCED BY BLANK

179984180287-180302180287-180293180296-180302180304-180919180304-180310180313-180319180321-180336180321-180327180330-180336180287-180336180287-180336

1 80732 & 180735180732-180740

1 80880 & 180883180847-180883181303-181320

181303-181342181303-181342181303-181342181563-181574181563-181574181563-181574

181919-181942181931-181942

1 81 893 & 181 897181906

Gladys Creek Samples181893-181940181893-181940182005-182032182005-182032

182413 & 1824161 82420 & 182424182428-182441182413-182456182413-182456182541-182565182541-182565

183328-183345

• • - -

ITABLE 5-1 Page 1


ORC11/19/90

SELNUMBER

183345183370183371183372183597

183623183624183625184159

184178184179

184951184952184953184954185669

185670

185671

185672

185638185991

187084187235187248187264187265187266187784187791187801187820187821187822187823187995

TYPEBLANKEQUIPEQUIP

LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)

EQUIP

TRIPLABLABTRIP

LAB(LIQ)LAB(SED)

TRIPTRIPLABLABTRIP

TRIP

LAB

LAB

EQUIPLAB

LABEQUIPTRIPTRIPLABLAB

EQUIPFIELDTRIPTRIPLABLABLABLAB

vocANALYSIS

YESYESYESYESYES

YESNONO

YES

YESYES

YESYESYESYESYES

YES

YES

YES

YESYES

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

BNAANALYSIS

NONOYESYESNO

NOYESYESNO

YESYES

NONO

YESYESNO

NO

YES

YES

YESYES

YESNONONOYESYESNONONONO

YESYESYESYES


NDNDNOND

2.0 methylethyl ketone2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylene chloride

NDND

55.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride

2.0 methyl chloride31.0 acetone

3.0 carbon disulfide6.0 benzene

3.0 methylene chloride250.0 bis(2-ethylhexyl)

phthalate10.0 methylethyl ketone1.0 methylethyl ketone9.0 methylethyl ketone

NDND

14.0 methytethylketone25.0 acetone

27.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride

48.0 acetone10.0 methylethyjketone2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylethyl ketone3.0 methylene chloride

3.0 acetoneND

21.0 methytethylketone3.0 methylene chloride2.0 methylene chloride3.0 methylene chloride1.0 methylene chloride

ND2.0 methylene chloride

. 3.0 methylene chlorideND

1.0 methylene chlorideNDND

2.0 methylene chloride2.0 methylene chloride

ND480.0 bis(2-ethy!hexyl)


183328-183366183328-183366183585-183594

183605-183622183585-183620183605-183620184147-184169

184147-184179184147-184179

184906-184933184936-184948184906-184921184924-184948185617-165666

185617-185666

185617-185639

185642-185666

185976-185988

187062-187080187223-187232187236-167245187249-187261187223-187255187258-187261

187751-187778187781-187817

187980-187992

TABLE 5-1 Page 2

II1IIIIIItII1III

11ItIfI


ORC11/19/90

SELNUMBER

188300188488188489188608188609188610

TYPEBLANK

LABTRIPLAB

FIELDTRIPLAB

VOCANALYSIS

YESYESYESYESYESYES

BNAANALYSIS

YESNOYESNONOYES


phthalateNDND

1.0 methylene chlorideND

5.0 methylethyl ketoneND


188285-188297188448-188484188448-188484

188604188564-188608188564-188609

TABLE 5-1 Page 3

APPENDIX A

GEOLOGIC LOGS

I

1

I

I

I

I

1

DRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD

PROJECT NO.20510-060

ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA

DATE START:3/13/90

DATE COMPLETE:A/11/90

BORING NO:IBB-1

SHEET NO.1 OF 2

PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUND

HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING INC.

DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EOUIWCNT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY

COORDINATES: )EPTH TO WATER/DATE-T1HE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: SEE COMMENTS BELOW.

CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD

DATE:3/13/903/14/903/15/903/16/903/22/903/23/904/11/90

ACTIVITY:SETUP; SAMPLED WITH SHELBY TUBE 0-18.7'; CORED 18.7-48'CORED 48-88'; REAMED (7 3/7") 0-86'; REAMED (12 1/4") 0-40'REAMED (12 1/4") 40-80'GROUTED 8" STEEL CASING IN HOLE 0-80'DRILLED OUT FLOAT SHOE; CORED 82-90'AND HIT STEEL OBJECT IN HOLETRIED TO DRILL OUT STEEL OBJECT FROM HOLE WITHOUT SUCCESSUSED VIDEO CAMERA TO TRY TO ID. OBJECT IN HOLE; FISHED FOR OBJECTIN HOLE; GROUTED HOLE SHUT.

SKETCH:

>ECONTAM1KATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG

DESCRIPTION COMMENTS

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

3.0-2. 0/2.0 (FT)5.0-5.0/1.85 (FT)

S.0-7.5/1.5 (FT)

0.0-1.0' CLAYEY FILL with 1 inchof asphaltic gravel at 11inches.

CORE

1.1 (FT)

12.0-13.5/1.3 (FT)

15.0-17.0/1.9 (FT)

18.0-18.7/3.7 (FT)

18.7-28.0/5.2 (FT)

28.0-38.0/5.9 (FT)

1.0-16.0' CLAY Brown, stiff,silty, very fine ((rained sandyCLAYColor changes to nottled gray andbrown at 3 feet.

Color changes to redish brown at6 feet, also sand contentincreases. Few organic particlesand roots.Silter at 12 feet

1 Color changes to brown at 15 feet555555555

-,16.0-18.0' DECOMPOSED SANDSTONE

• iitt mi••mulliiiiiiniIMIIIIII

• •••••II I

18.0-88.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, weakly '"cemented with iron oxide andcalcite.

Placed bentonite from84 to 77 feet thengrouted 8" steel pipeto surface

COULD NOT ADVANCEHOLE BEYOND 84 FEETAFTER GROUTING 8 INCH:STEEL PROTECTORCASING IN PLACE FROM80 FEET TO SURFACE .DUE TO STEEL OBJECTIN HOLE. GROUTEDHOLE SHUT ON 4/11/90.

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURING 'DRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE CONSTANTLYMONITORED WITH AN OVAOR H-NU.

• •••••••I

• •••••••I

• •••••••.I

CORE S8.0-48.0/3.6 (FT)

• Illlllll

• ••••••••

• •••••••I• Illlllll

in linniiiiiini• ••••••• i• ••••••I •• ••••in •

36-36 1/2 ' Silt layer

* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESS1VESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE

CORE CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL

DRILLING/SAMPLING PROJECT NO.ACTIVITY RECORD 20510-060

DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

-

45 ——

50 —

-

55 —

60 —

-

65 —

70 —

M

75 —

80 —

85 —•••

••

90 —

95 —•w

«•

100 —

ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB-1 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 2

LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED)

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

48.0-58.0V9.3 (FT)

S8.0-68.0V?.5 (FT)

S8.0-78.0/?.1 (FT)

78. 8-88. O/?.6 (FT)

TONS/ «SO FT

SSIGNEDNUMBER

JEOLOGICOG

• ••••••0

• 1111110

•••••••0

• ••mi •

• • •• ••• 0

• ••••••1

:.:::::.iinin •

• • •• ••• ••• •• ••• g

• i •• ••• g• • •• ••• g

• •••••• B• • •• ••• g

• i ••••••

lining• i ••••••

::::::::

••>••••••• •• ••• g

DESCRIPTION

65-67' Honeyconfc structure,approximately 1/16"diameter voids

78' One small fracture healed withcalcite.

BOTTOM OF BORING AT 88 FEET

COMMENTS

*

' - --

- •




DATE START:3/25/90

DATE COMPLETE:4/6/90

BORING NO:IBB-2

SHEET NO.1 OF 3


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-* 7/8"


DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY

COORDINATES:N5709S3.5 E1940867.8

IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION:1361.7 FEET

GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME:3/25/901330 HR1430 HR3/26/901100 HR1950 HR

4/5/904/6/90

ACTIVITY:

MOVE TO AND SETUP AT DRILLING LOCATIONREAM TO 35 FEET AND CORED TO 85 FEET

REAMED 0-80 F.FET, 12 1/4 IN. DIA.COMPLETED INSTALLING 8 INCH CASING TO80 FEETCORED 93 TO 141 FEETCOMPLETED MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL IMG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

0.0-6.0' CLAY Broun and graymottled with yellow (ironstained), stiff, nilty CLAY.Stiffer with depth. Few piecesof nedium gravel

6.0-20.0' GYPSUM White mottledwith redish pink, phonic andfractured GYPSUM. Many solutionchannels, most filled withsecondary fiberous gypsun and afew filled with clay. Fracturesalso filled with secondarygypsum.

NOTE: This well wasdrilled approximately10 feet from SBB-3.The hole was reamedto 35 feet beforesampling was begun.Cuttings were logged,but the descriptionsare essentially fromSBB-3 for the first35 feet.

••••mil••••••••i

••••mi •

•••••••• i

HIM ••••

20.0-141.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,with yellow iron staining,-verysilty, very fine grained,friable SANDSTONE. Weaklycemented with calcite and ironoxide. Appears sasturatedbelow 22.5 feet ind also moreweakly cemented. Few smallspots (1/4 inch diameter) ofwhite calcite occur throughoutthe core to 35 feet.

core 55.5-4S.5/?.3 (FT)

• •>••••*•

• ••(••••I

• •••••••I

• •••••Ill

• •••• Illl

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.

• UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE

CORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL




DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

-—

45 —

^

50 —

60 —

-

65 —

70 —

75 —

80 —••

V

90 —

95 —••

«••

IOO —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

5.0-55.0/9.6 (FT)

55. 0-65 .O/9.5 (FT)

iS.0-75.0/?.7 (FT)

75. 0-85. 0/9.B (FT)

73. 0-111.0f4.9 (FT)

TONS/ *SO. FT

SSIGNEDNUMBER

3RAPHICZOLOGIC-OG

•••••• •

• ••••••

:::::::••••••••••••• ••••in t

,,.,.,,:::::::iiiiini

>•••••••

••••••• ••••••>• ••• •• in •

•••••••i

iiniiiititt««tt• i linn

limn i

• ••• in •

DESCRIPTION

8 52 feet Clay filled fracture 1/4inch thick.

55.0 to 56.5 feet Very weaklycemented and saturated.

At 65 feet color becomes redder.

i

93.0 to 95.5 feet Sandstone becomesclayey.

95.5 to 121.0 feet Sandstonebecomes almost uncemented. Poorcore recovery.

COMMENTS

,'



LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED) it

DEPTHIN

FEET

100 —

-••

105 —

-

110 —

115 —

I20 —

I25 —mm

••

I35 —

I40 —

I45 —

ISO —

I55 —

I60 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

111.0-121.0/3.0CFT)

121.0-131.0/6.2CFT)

131.0-141.0/9.7CFT)

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

iRAPHICiEOLOGIC.OG

• •••••••

• •••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••• • ••••• •

• •••••••

• •••••••

".'.'. '.'.'.'.

• • ••••••

mi ••••• • ••••• •• •••••• ••• •• ••••• • •• ••••• • ••••• i

•••• ••• •• ••• ••• ••••• ••• ••• ••••••

mi ••• ••••••inmi in •

DESCRIPTION

121.0 TO 131.0 FEET Sandstonecontains clayey end Bandy zones.


COMMENTS




DATE START:5/7/90


BORING NO:IBB-3

SHEET NO.1 OF 3


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:POOL DRILLING AND MACHINE

DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY

COORDINATES:N569031.6 E1943390.9

DEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1327.8 FEET



TIME:

5/7/90

5/8/90

5/19/20

ACTIVITY:

MOVED TO AND SETUP AT DRILLINGLOCATION; REAMED HOLE TO 40 FEET;CORED HOLE 40 TO 80 FEET; REAMED HOLETO 12 1/4 INCHES FROM 0 TO 52 FEET.

REAMED 52 TO 82 FEET; TRIED TO INSTALL8 INCH STEEL CASING WITHOUT SUCCESS.

COMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SEE LOG FOR SBB-11 FOR DETAILEDDESCRIPTION OF LITHOLOGY FROMSURFACE TO 27 FEET.

HOLE REAMED TO 40FEET. CORING BEGAN AT40 FEET.


101 tt in •• HI 01 III •

• 0101 III I

• OIOIIII >

101 01 III I

• OIOIIII 0

• mill ••• •

27.0-140' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Top approximately 2feet is fractured and decomposed.

Four inch thick silt seam at 36feet.

••••••in

* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESS IVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE



DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

—

45 —

—

50 —

55 —

60 —

65 —

70 —

75 —

80 —

:85 —

90 —

95 —

-

IOO —



SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

-

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

10. 0-50. O/9.0 (FT)

50. 0-60. O/9.7 (FT)

SO.0-70.0/9.9 (FT)

70. 0-80. O/9.7 (FT)

55. 0-95. 0/10.0 (FT)

K.0-100/10.0 (FT)

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

ZOLOGIC00

• •••••• •• •••••••••••••••

••••••••• •••••••

::::::::

••••••••

::::::::

::::::::ii linn

ii •• ••• •

!!"!!!!••••••••!!!!!"!•i ••••••

•••••••••• ••••••

•• •• ••• •••••••••

•i ••••• ••••••••••••• in •

DESCRIPTION

49 to 52.3 feet and 54 TO 54.6feet, Very weakly cemented.

60 to 63 feet, Very weaklycemented.

70 to 75 feet. Hard, very wellcemented with calcite. Core, whenfractured by hand, leaves almostconcoidal fractures.

COMMENTS

:

, . '

- - - - - - • :


DEPTHIN

FEET

IOO ——

™

*

I05 —

—~

no —~••—

115 —

~

I20 —

-

I25 —

I30 —

1C

140 —

145 —

ISO —

155 —

160 —



SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

05-110/0.0 (FT)

115-125/10.0 (FT)

125- 135/(FT)

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNED'NUMBER

XAPHICSEOLOGICOG

• •••••• •••••••••• •••••••• •••••••

::::::::• OIOIIII

• ••••••I•0 10 Illl

• Old III I

lOIOIIII

• 0 10 III I

• 0 ••••• IID 10 till

• •••••I I• •••••••It IIIIO I

• •••••1 1

tiling i• ••••••I

• ••••••I

• ill tin

ii ii ••• •• I II Illl

• ••••in

it ii ••• •

DESCRIPTION

AT 125 BEGINS GRADING INTO ASILTSTONE.129-131' Whitish silt layer131-132' Clay layer132-135' Red Siltstone


COMMENTS

---•"


PROJECT HO.20510-060


DATE START:5/19/90


BORING NO:IBB-4

SHEET NO.1 OF 3


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY

COORDINATES:1567104.8 E1942637.0

>EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME:5/19

5/20

5/21

5/22

5/23

ACTIVITY:MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION.DRILL AND SAMPLE TO 80 FEET.E-LOG HOLEREAM HOLE TO 12 1/4 INCH DIAM. TO 84'

SET 8" STEEL CASING TO 83 FEET ANDGROUT IN PLACE.

DRILLED OUT CEMENT SHOE

CORED TO 133' AND COMPLETED WELLCONSTRUCTION.

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

D.0-2.0/(FT)

3.0-5.0/1.0 (FT)

6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.O/1.4 (FT)

12.0-14.0/1.7 (FT)

15.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)

18.0-20.0/1.7 (FT)

21.0-23.0/1.4 (FT)

25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)

50.0-32.0/2.0 (FT)

55.0-37.0/2.0 (FT)

1.50

1.25

1.25

0.50

0.50

<0.50

<0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

152

0.0-2.0'-.stiff.

FILL)

CLAY & GRAVEL Brown,sandy CLAY t GRAVEL (ROAD

2.0-9.0' CLAY Brown, stiff, siltyCLAY with veinlets of gypsum

153

154

155

156

157

158

9.0-14.0* CLAY Dark gray and blackto dark brown and gray withdepth, silty sandy CLAY withgypsun veinlets. Stiff 9-11',

-i soft/median stiff 12-14'. Odorat 9 feet, oil? stain at 12

I feet.

LOST CIRCULATION ATAPPROX 8 FEET. USEDBENTONITE AND HULLSTO RESTORE.


14.0-24.0' CLAY Dark brown, softto medium stiff, silty CLAY

21' Becomes candy, black stained

24.0-39.0' CLAY Dark gray andbrown, very soft, sandy CLAYwith odor.

Silty 32 to 35 feet

Color change at 35 feet to redbrown also becomes sandy.

39.0-133.0' SANDSTONE

* UNCONFINEDCCMPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE

ORE - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: 188-4 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 3


DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

45 —~

~

•

50 —

-

55 ——

-

—

65 —~

••

70 —

v

«

75 —

••

M

80 —

w

85 —

•

90 —

^

•

95 —

v

100 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

60.0-50.0/0.0 (FT)

50. 0-60. O/B.3 (FT)

SO.0-70.0/>.5 (FT)

TO.0-80.0/P.O (FT)

14. 0-93. 0/f.O (FT)

73.0-103/tO.O (ft)

TONS/ •SO FT

SSIGNEDNUMBER

3RAPHICJEOLOG1COG

• •••••••

••••••• •• •••••• •• ••••••i••••••••• •mm• •••••••• •••••••• ••• ••••• •••••• •• •••••• •

• ••• ••• •• •••••• •••••••• •mummini i• •••••••

• •••••••nmm• • •• ••• i

• ••••••imum• • mm

mi im

mi in •

********

ii •• ••• •• • II ••! I

mumii •• ••••

• •••••• •

ii mm

• • •• ••• •• • •• ••• •• •••••••

it mm• • ••••••

• • ••••••• •••••••

• •••••••

• • mil i• • mn i

DESCRIPTION

39.0-134.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, moderatelycemented with iron oxide andcalcite

93 to 103 feet very weaklycemented.

COMMENTS

f

• - - —

i




DEPTHIN

FEET

100 —

-

105 —-m *

110 —~

115 —

120 —

125 —••~~

130 —"

140-

150 —

155 —

160 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

REAM

RUN/RECOVERY

103-113/9. 3 (FT)

I13-123/?.S (FT)

123- 133/10.0 (FT)

133-134 FT

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

SEOLOGIC.OG

iiiiitii• ••••••I• ••••in• •••mi•••••in

• ••••••••••••in

••••••••

•••••in

• •••••••• ••••••i• •••••••

• • ••••••

Hffi

••••••••••••••• •••••••i •••••••• •••••••• i•>••••••••••••i ••• •••••••••• ••• •

DESCRIPTION

103-134 feet moderatelycemented.

113-123 FEET CROSS-BEDDINGEVIDENT IN CORE.

117.7-120.5' SILTSTONE Lightpurple with dark purple stains,

-i friable, micas four,, slightly finesandy SILTSTONE. Few recementedfractures.

SANDSTONE AS ABOVE 117.7 FEET.


COMMENTS

r _- —



ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA

DATE START:5/31/90


BORING NO:IBB-5

SHEET NO.1 OF 3

PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUNO

HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / MATER ROTARY

COORDINATES: >EPTH TO UATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME:5/31

6/1

6/3

ACTIVITY:Moved to and setup at location, begandrilling and sampling.

Reamed hole, set 63 feet of steelcasing, and grouted inplace thrucement shoe

Drilled out cement shoe and cored to138 feet. Completed wellconstruction.

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT OECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

D.0-2.0/2.0 (FT)J.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)

S.O-B.O/D.O (FT)

0.0 (FT)

12.0-17.0/3.3 (FT)

17.0-26.O/7.0 (FT)

2.50

3.50

180 0.0-2.0' CLAY Brown, slightly-. silty, stiff CLAY

mil in •• ii ii in imil in •mil in •iiiinii •on it m iiiniiii i• •••••••I• •••••••i

CORE 26.0-36.0/?.2 (FT)

CORE 36.0-46.O/10.0 (FT)

iiiiiniiin iniiitine •••»IIIIQIIII• IDIIIIII• iciiiiiiIIEICIIII• m 10 in •• •OIBIIII

IIOIOIIII

IIOIDIII I

• 10 10 III I

IIOIOIIII

IIOIOIIII

• IOIOIII I

IIOIOIII I

IIOIOIIII

IIOIOIIII

no to 111 1• iiiiiiii

2.0-9.0' CLAY Mottled orangebrown, slightly silty, verystiff CLAY with a few pieces oforganic material and roots


9.0-138.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite

* UNCON FINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE




DATE:SEE SHEET 1

BORING NO: IBB-5 SHEET NO.2 OF 3


DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

—~' ^

45 —

~

50 —

-—

55 —

60 —•

j ~•

65 —

—

70 —~~—

75 —

~

80 —"

—

~

85 —

90 —~

-

95 —-

100 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

46.0-56.0/10.0 (FT)

>6.0-66.0/?.3 (FT)

S6.0-76.0/10.0 (FT)

76. 0-86. O/10.0 (FT)

B.0-98.0/7.0 (FT)

78.0-108/JO.O (FT)

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

ZOLOGIC.OG

• •••••••• •••••••• iiiiiii

•••••in• •••••• •• •••••••• •••••••ilium

iiniii i• •••••• i• •••••• i

••••••!!••••••• ••• •• ••• •••••••• i•••••••••• •••••••• ii in ••• •• ••••••••••• i•••••••••• •• ••• ••• •• in ••I •• in •••••••• •••••••I ••• •••••••• •• ••• •• III III!

• •••••I I

• •(•1*11

• ••••••I

• •••••I I

• •••••• I

• •••••• 1

• •••••• I

• •••••••

• III ••••

• ••••••I

• ••••••1

• I •• ••• •

• • •• ••• •

• ••••••I

Illlllll

• Illllll

• ••••••IIlllllll

• •••••••

• •••••I I

• •••••1 I

DESCRIPTION

SANDSTONE (CONTINUED)

59 TO 63 FEET UNO-HENTED ZONE

93-97 FEET UNCEHENTED ZONE

COMMENTS

f

'. i


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: IBB- 5 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 3 OF 3


DEPTHIN

FEET

100 —•*•"•

105 —

—

110 —••

——

115 ——

120 —••

125 —

130 —-

_

,J

150 —

155 —

160 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

108-118/10.0 (FT)

118-128/7.5 (FT)

128- 138/?.S (FT)

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

SRAPHIC5EOLOGICOG

0(0(((((

0(0(((ll

DIOIKI •

0101(111

OIO((II(

0(0((((0

0(0(((IO

01 0((ll •

OIO(((II

mo((((oEIO((((I

OIOI((I •

0( 0( •(( •

01 Ol(((l

01 0((l((

OIOI((IO

OIOI((I •

01. III. I

0101(11 0

HI Ol((((

(• B( ••( (

• • •••(( •

II 91 HI

(•••••(

„„,„,

'

DESCRIPTION

SANDSTONE (CONTINUED)

126-129 FEET COLOR LIGHTER, LESSCEMENT

NOTE: LAST 5 FEET ANGULARBEDDING VISIBLE IN CORE

136-138 FEET HARD, LIGHT BEIGEORANGE, VERY WELL CEMENTED


COMMENTS

*




DATE START:3/12/90


BORING NO:SBB-1

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:4-3/4 IN.


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / WATER ROTARY


)EPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1360.0 FEET

GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED MONITORING WELL SEECONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME: ACTIVITY:

820 HR

1430 HR

1530 HR

1705 HR

3/16/90

BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLING

COMPLETED SAMPLING

COMPLETED REAMING HOLE TO 6-1/2 IN.

COMPLETED SETTING SCREEN, CASING,FILTER PACK, AND BENTONITE SEAL.

GROUTED TO SURFACE AND INSTALLEDSTEEL SURFACE PROTECTION.

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER 3/11/90 BEFORE MOVING ONLOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

CORE

CORE

0.0-0.8/0.8 (FT)

3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)

6.0-8.5/2.3 (FT)

9.0-10.5/1.2 (FT)

12.0 (FT)REFUSAL

12.0-17.0/4.8 (FT)17.0-22.0/

(FT)

22.0-26.5/2.6 (FT)

26.5-31.5/2.9 (FT)

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

0.0-2.0' SILT Blockish brown

I (oil stained), slighty clayeyand very fine sandy SILT.

HEAD SPACE READINGSUSING PHOTOVAC:

ZSZS3Z

2.0'-10.0' CLAY Mediun gray,slightly very fine sandy,firm CLAY. 8 6.0' becomesstiff and mottled yelloworange, sand content

I increases slightly and a fewpieces of fine gravel areobserved.

SS-1SS-2SS-3SS-4

25 ppm18 ppm46 ppm100 ppm

Only sample SS-4 sentto laboratory foranalysis.

10.0'-12.0' CLAY IDark gray,soft, slightly fine sandy,CLAY.

55555335}335553555••••••••i

12.0'-24.6' GYPSUM Phanic, softGYPSUM; 12.0'-H.O' mottledblack and white (oilstained?), 14.0'-24.6'mottled redish pink andwhite. 12.0'-23.1' somesolution channels, all filledwith secondary fiberousgypsum. 23.1'-24.6' a fewopen solution channelspartically filled with clayand very fine itand.

24.6'-26.5' DECOMPOSED SANDSTONE

26.5'-31.5' SANDSTONE Red brownwith orange cast (ironstained) very fine grained tosilty sized, friableSANDSTONE. Weakly cementedwith calcite and iron oxide.

No core recovery, redfine sand in corebarrel.

* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE

CORE - CARBIDE BIT;':: CORE BARREL

BOTTOM OF BORING AT 31.5 FEET




DATE START:3/17/90


BORING NO:SBB-2

SHEET NO.1 OF 1

PERSONNEL:ROYE BEENE

HOLE SIZE:5 1/2--4 7/8"


DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY


1EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: CROWD ELEVATION:1363.9 FEET



TIME:

800 HR1000 HR1115 HR1545 HR

ACTIVITY:

COMPLETED SETUPCOMPLETED DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCONDUCTED HEAD SPACE READINGSCOMPLETED HELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —I

20 —i

25 —

30 —

35 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

J.0-2.0/(FT)

5.0-4.5/1.5 (FT)

i.0-9.0/1.1 (FT)

1.0 (FT)

12. 0-15. O/1.5 (FT)

15.0-18.0/1.5 (FT)

18.0-21. O/2.0 (FT)

21. 0-24. O/2.5 (FT)

24.0-34.0/5.8 (FT)

0.0-2.0' LOAM Red brown, very sandy

3.25

3.5/4.5*

4.5*

4.5*

4.0

4.0

1.5

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

2.0-24.0' CLAY Black, sitty loam,organic, very stiff to hard,with gasoline odor, with tracesof gravel below 15 feet

4-5 inches asphalticgravel at surface

HEAD SPACE READINGSWITH Hnu in pen

SS-5SS-6SS-7SS-8SS-9SS-10SS-11

4.04.5357030

10050

••••••••i•••••mi• Illl III!

24.0-34.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,very silty, very fine grained,weakly cemented near top of zone,occassional fractures

••••••II


* UNCONFINEDOPPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE





DATE START:3/24/90


BORING'NO:SBB-3

SHEET NO.1 OF 1

PERSONNEL:ERIC 8ERGLUND

HOLE SIZE:4 7/8 IN.


DRILLER:WAYNE

DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / WASTER ROTARY


IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1362.0 FEET



TIME:

945 MR

1430 HR

1720 HR

ACTIVITY:

COMPLETED SETUP

COMPLETED SAMPLING AND DRILLING

COMPLETED WELL INSTALLATION

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENTDECONTAMINATED PRIOR TO MOVE TO AND SETUP ATDRILLING LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/*SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

0.0-1.0/1.0 (FT)

3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)

6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.O/1.0 (FT)

11.0-12.0/0.0 (FT)

15.0-25.0/9.8 (FT)

3.0

3.0

2.5

0.75

SS-12

SS-13

SS-14

SS-15

I 0.0-1.0' CLAY Brown, very siItyCLAY, with roots.

.0-12.0' CLAY Brown and graymottled with yellow (ironStained), stiff, silty CLAY.Stiffer with'depth. Fewpieces of medium gravel


SSSSSSS

I ••!••••••

• •••••••••I Illlllll I

-I 12.1-20.V GYPSUM White mottledwith redish pink, phanic,and fractured GYPSUM. Manysolution channels, mostfilled with secondaryfiberous gypsim and a fewfilled with clay. Fracturesalso filled with secondarygypsun. Top six inchessomewhat decomposed.

1CORE 25.5-35.5/

9.5 (FT)• ••••••II I

• ••••••III

• •••••••I I

••••••III

• •••••••I I

20.1-35.5' SANDSTONE Red brownwith yellow iron staining,very silty, very finegrained,friable SANDSTONE,weally cemented with calciteand iron oxide. Appearssaturated belou 22.5 feet,end is more weakly cemented.Few small spots (1/4 inchdiameter) of white calciteoccur throughout core. Clayfilled fracture, 0.03'thick, at 31.9 feet; is onlyfracture observed in core.



SH - SHELBY TUBECORE - CARBIDE BIT

CORE BARREL




DATE START:5/27/90


BORING NO:SBB-4

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"


DRILLER: WAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G D 1500 / UATER ROTARY


IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1352.6 FEET



TIME:

1100 HR

1630 HR

ACTIVITY:

BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLING

COMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DECONED DRILLNG RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENTWITH STEAMED CLEANER PRIOR TO MOVING TODRILLING LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

iSSIGNEDNUMBER

SRAPHICiEOLOGIC.OG


REAMEDTO

15 FEET

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —I

25 —

30 —

0-13' GYPSUM Pinkish red mottledin white, soft, phanicGYPSUM. Some large solutionchannels and cavities infirst 7 feet

CORE 15-25/9.6 FT

01 Cl III I

01 OHM I

Olllllll

DI min iI I O I I I I I

• I 01 ••• •

• ••••••I11(1111 1

13-25' SANDSTONE Red brown, veryfine grained to silt sized,friable SANDSTONE

LOST CIRCULATION AT5 FEET

Used 4 sacks ofbentonite and 1 sackof hulls to plug hole

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONSWHICH, WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.

• ••••III• ••••••I


* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVE.STRENGTH





HOLE SIZE:5



TIME:

4/6/901600 HR1800 HR1900 HR

4/7/90730 HR845 HRvt& nw

ACTIVITY:

1/2"-4 7/8"

-ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

DATE START:4/6/90

POOL DRILLING AND MACHINEDRILLER:

IEPTH TO MATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1352.2 FEET

SKETCH:


UAYNE

BORING NO:SBB-5

SHEET NO.1 OF 1

DRILLING EOUI PMENT/METHCO :G-D 1500 / WATER ROTARY


STARTED DRILLINGCOMPLETEDCOMPLETED

SAMPLING AND CORINGE-LOGGING.

BEGAN WELL CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETEDM^^rkC 1 ft/

if

DECONTAMINATION: DRILLSTEAM

RIG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHCLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

nepTHl/Cr 1 n

INFEET

_

-——5 —

——

10 —

-

-

--

9ft

_

——

25 —

—••

30 —

:_35 —

-

^

40 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

CORE

cORE

RUN/RECOVERY

6.0-12.0/4.0 (FT)

IO.O-15.0/L 9 ttT\4.£ ir l /

15.0-J.>n n/3.3 <FT>

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

iEOLOGIC.00

j-.-.-.- -JIT.- .--.-.-.-.- f.-

sxsssstsssssssss~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~yg*~

sxssssssSSSSSSSS

DESCRIPTION

0-8.9' GYPSUM Pinkish white.very weathered phanic GYPSUM,with many thin solutionchannels, some particallyfilled with clay.

J«

In"Illllll 1

II II III 1

II II III!

• I Illll •• III till

ri9.

0-0 0' n *w w • V i»f

CLAYY Peri hard aandvi HIW, nai u onriujr

0-9.3' SILTSTONE Light gray,friable SILTSTOKE

3-20.verv

0' SAfine

HOST fUJF CoH hrn unarained to si It

sized, friable SANDSTONE,weakly-cemented with calciteand iron oxide. 15-20 feet

~i csscntislly not concntcd*


COMMENTS

NOTE: 10 to 12 feetsaturated withHC product .Core stainedgray- black.

nri 1 l»rc hun i icrb oY^f^p pea i ft

f AB h i rMrcain 1 1^^itr>^^4 B may&UTIC IC^Ia%*«l ^^« w *tm*r\

of 0.8 ppm on h-nu.Mud pit when drillingwater circulating 5'to 6 pom.Core barrel20 ppn when firstextracted from hole.

,

* UNCON FINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE


I




DATE START:4/7/90


BORING NO:SBB-6

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY


IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIHE: GROUND ELEVATION:1349.2 FEET



TINE:

1000 HR1400 HR

ACTIVITY:

BEGIN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELLL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

0-2.0/1.7 (FT)

6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.0/2.0 (FT)

12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)

15.0-25.O/B.4 (FT)

1.2

4.4

4.0

4.5*

SS-18

SS-19

SS-20

0-2.0' SILT Dark brown, soft,I clayey SILT (Topsoil)

2.0-14.7' CLAY Dark brown,hard, silty CLAY, with somemottled iron stained spots.Small black sports of organicmaterial were observed.


-J 14.7-15.0' GYPSUM Pinkish whitegypsum observed in cuttings.

CORE 15.0-25.0/5.85 (FT)

15.0-30.0' SANDSTONE Redbrown, very fine grained tosilt Sized, friable SANDSTONE,weakly cemented with iron oxideand calcite.


40 —


SH - SHELBY TUBE


IDRILLING/SAMPLINGACTIVITY RECORD



DATE START:4/7/90


BORING NO:SBB-7

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2«-4 7/8"







TIME:

1530 HR1830 HR

ACTIVITY:

BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL RIG AMD SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER


5 —

10 —

152 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —1

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

0.0-2.O/1. (FT)

3.0-5.0/1.8 (FT)

6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.0/2.0 (FT)

12.0-14.0/1.7 (FT)

15.0-17.0/1.0 (FT)

18.0-20.O/1.0 (FT)

Z1.0-23.0/).2 (FT)

28.0-32.O/1.1 (FT)

0.25

2.5

2.1

(0.25

SS-21 .0-1.0' SILT Dark brown, clayeySILT

1.0-2.0' CLAY Yellow brown,si Ity CLAY

SS-22IlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllll

••••••• i111! •>••

III! ••••

2.0-5.5' CLAY Mottled orange-yellow brown and gray, veryfine sandy, silty CLAY. Dairp


5.5-8.0' SILT Yellow brown,slightly very fine sandy SILT.Moist

8.0-27.5' SAND Yellow brown,iron stained, silty, very fineSAND. Saturated

Less iron stained at 18 feet.Also less silt.

27.5-32.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE.



SH - SHELBY TUBE

CORE'- CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL




DATE START:4/8/90

DATE COMPLETE:A/8/90

BORING NO:SBB-8

SHEET NO.1 OF 2


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"




)EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1317.6 FEET



TIME:

900 HR1630 HR

ACTIVITY:

SETUP AND BEGIN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED UELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

•RAPHICXOLOGICOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

0.0-2.0/1. 3 (FT)

3.0-5.O/1.8 (FT)

6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.O/2.0 (FT)

12.0-U.O/2.0 (FT)

I5.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)

18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)

25.0-27.0/(FT)

SO.0-32.0/2.0 (FT)

55.0-37.0/2.0 (FT)

1.0.0-42.0/2.0 (FT)

4.5

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.25

SS-23

SS-24

0.0-1.0' SILT Very dark brown,II19 III 11 1 slighty clayey, SILT. HC

SS-25

1.0

stained with HC odor.

1.0-3.0' SAND Yellow brown,clayey, silty, very fine SAND;

3.0-25.0' SILT Grayish tan,slightly fine sandy and clayeySILT with veinlets (<1/32«thick) of secondary gypsunthroughout section. Claycontent increases and sandcontent decreases with depth.

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.Top 8 inches ofsample stained withHC.

-125.0-28.0' SAND Gray, slightlyIIII III 11 silty, clayey, very fine SAND.II Hill I|J

cO.25

cO.25 SS-26

28.0-34.0' CLAY Dark gray,soft, slightly sandy CLAY

34.0-60.0' CLAY Greenish black,soft, organic CLAY with smallgastropod shell scatteredthroughout. Color changes toblack below 40 feet.Some decomposed plant materialbelow 45 feet. Also containsisolated clayey sand pockets(<3 inches in diameter) below45 feet.

Organic smell.

* UNCONFINEDCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH .

SH T SHELBY TUBE



DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

M_

65 —

75 —

80 —

85 —

90 —

95 —

IOO —

ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: SBB-8 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90 | 2 OF 2

LOG OF BORING (CONTINUED) '

SAMPLE

TYPE

SH

SH

SH

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

«.0-47.0/2.0 (FT)

55.0-57.0/3.5 (FT)

60.0' NOiECOVERY

SO.0-70.0/1.1 (FT)

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

XOLOGIC.00

iniiiii• •••••••• •••••••II It III!

• I ••••••II II III 1

II II III I

II Illll I

Illllll I

DESCRIPTION

SEE PAGE 1

60.0-70.0 SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt nized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE.Weakly cemented with calciteand iron oxide,,


COMMENTS

»•. t



PROJECT NO. ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE START.20510-060 CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90

HOLE SIZE: DRILLING CONTRACTOR:5


1/2"-4 7/8" POOL DRILLING INC.

IEPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME:


TIME:

4/8/901700 HR

4/9/90730 HR

1200 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATION

BEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION

DRILLER

GROUND ELEVATION:1335.8 FEET

SKETCH:

DATE COMPLETE: BORING NO:4/9/90

: WAYNE

SBB-9SHEET NO.1 OF 1

DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / WATERROTARY



LOG OF BORING

rtFDTU

INFEET

_

—

—c

—-

_

m-

—-

-15 —

-

—.

20 —-

—-

25 —-*•

—

30 —

—_

35 —

-

^

40 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

SH9n

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

RUN/

RECOVERY

0 0-2 O/V • V f, • V/

1.0 (FT)

3.0-5.0/0.5 (FT)

6.0-7.0/0 5 ftST \. j \ i i g

10.0-20.O/6.0 (FT)

iO.0-28.O/S.O (FT)

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

SS-27

ZOLOGICOG

3353I955555355555555

5595595595955 9

55 i

•• ••••••••••••i ••••••in••••••>»•••••••••••••••i••••••••••••••••••••••• •

••••••••••••••••••••••at••••••••••••••• i••••••••

•••••••i•i ••••••

DESCRIPTION

_ 0 0-0 L> SAUn P**l kmm eil*u^ V.v U.*( 9R

very fine SAND.0.4-1.0* SILT Dark brown, clayeySILT.

1.0-8.

Roots present. (TOPSOIL)

0' WEATHERED SANDSTONE Redbrown, very

• fii>£M*4 +A WOP

weathered, silt** 4«»M fi^ainori

— V 1 &K«. l>w .top J 1 1 1 Ito yf «. 1 I .toM

1 SANDSTONE.1

8.0-28.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE. Weaklycementedcalcite.

with iron oxide and819 feet 6 inches of

core saturated with black HC.

16 to 19 feet core saturatedwith water.

20 to 28 feet core saturatedwith water and is slightlyclayey.

824 feet core is stained blackwith 6 inches of HC.


COMMENTS

10 to 16 feet veryweakly cementedresulting in poorcore recovery

HC Oder. H-nuregistered 5 ppm onreturn water,breathing

,•* i

zone clear.

. - .


SH .- SHELBY TUBE




ORC SUPERFUND SITECYRIL, .OKLAHOMA

DATE START:4/9/90


BORING NO:SBB-10

SHEET NO.1 OF 2


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2«-4 7/8"




IEPTN TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1321.6 FEET



TIME:

1300 HR1400 HR2000 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONBEGAN DRILLING AND SAMPLINGCOMPLETED CONSTRUCTING WELL

SKETCH:

DECONTAMINATION: DRILL IMG AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT DECONED WITHSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION. '

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GRAPHICGEOLOGICLOG


1

5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

0.0-2.O/1.0 (FT)3.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)

6.0-7.0/0.4 (FT)

9.0-10.0/0.8 (FT)

12.0-14.0/1.0 (FT)

15.0-17.0/2.0 (FT)

18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)

25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)

50.0-32.O/2.0 (FT)

35.0-37.0/1.3 (FT)

1.25

>4.0

>4.0

SS-28

SS-29

iiimiii 0.0-2.0' SAND Brown, dry,-i silty. very fine SAND. (FILL)

2.0-5.0' CLAY Dark brown, silty-, CLAY. (FILL)

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE CONSTANTLYMONITORED WITH ANOVA ORH-NU.

5.0-9.0' SILT Mediun brownslightly clayey, SILT with thin

—i veinlets of gypsum.

SS-30

SS-31

9.0-18.0' CLAY Medium brown,changing to yellow brown at12', silty (no silt below 15'}CLAY. Hard and slightly moistto 15', soft below. Thingypsun veinlets scatteredthroughout.

<0.25

<0.25

18.0-29.0' CLAY Gray brown to•tedium gray, slightly silty tovery fine grained sandy below25', CLAY. A few small piecesof organic eater scatteredthroughout.

SS-32

29.0-36.0' ORGANIC CLAY Black,very fine grained sandy,

. organic CLAY. Few small piecesof wood scattered throughout.

36.0-40.0' CLAY Yellow orangegray, very fine grained sandyCLAY.


SH - SHELBY TUBE



nppTMIN

FEET

—-

45 —•™_

50 —

_

-•

55 —™

-

••

65 —

•

70 —

mt

«•

mmmm

••

mi

mmmm

mm

mmmm

mm

mm*

mmmm

mm

mmm

ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: S8B-10 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 2 OF 2


SAMPLE

TYPE

fill

CORE

RUN/RECOVERY

in n.L? ft/

2.0 (FT)

iO.0-60.0/>.0 (FT)

TONS/ *SO FT

SSIGNEDNUMBER

XOLOGiCOG

IlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIlllllllIllllllliiieiuiIDIDIIII

• OIOMII

ID 10 III!

loieni iIDIDOI 1

lltOlll 1

III ID 11(1

• IIOI1II

........

DESCRIPTION

40.0-48.0' SAND Gray brownchanging to red brown at 42',clayey, very fine grainedSAND.

48.0-60.0' SANDSTONE Red brown.friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite.


COMMENTS

*




DATE START:4/10/90


BORING NO:SBB-11

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1SOO / UATER ROTARY


(EPTH TO UATER/DATE-T1ME: GROUND ELEVATION:1327.9 FEET



TIME: ACTIVITY:

800 HR1200 HR

MOVE TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONCOMPLETED CONSTRUCTION OF WELL

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ «SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

0.0-2.O/1.4 (FT)3.0-5.O/2.0 (FT)

6.0-8.O/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.O/2.0 (FT)

12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)

15.0-17.0/J.O (FT)

18.0-20.O/2.0 (FT)

21.0-23.O/2.0 (FT)

25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)

SO.0-40.0/}.0 (FT)

SS-33

0.75

1.0

<0.25

O.25

1.25

1.00

<0.25

1.50

0.0-2.0' SILT Brown, slightlyclayey SILT with roots.(TOPSOIL)

2.0-6.0' CLAY Dark brown, very—i fine grained sanoy CLAY.


SS-346.0-17.0' CLAY Orange brown

changing to slightly redishbrown at 15', slightly veryfine sandy CLAY, generallysoft changing to stiff at 15feet. Thin veinlets of gypsunare scattered thourghout.Damp.

17.0-27.0' CLAY Redish brown,very fine grained sandy CLAY.Generally stiff und dairp butsoft and wet between 21 and 23feet.

SS-35

• ••••••I •

• ••••••II

• •••••••I

• ••••••I I

• ••••••I IIlllllll I

• Illl till

• Illlllll

• ••••••I IIII II III I

27.0-40.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Top approximately 2feet is fractured anddecomposedFour inch thick silt seam at36'


Lost circulationbetween 27 and 30feet. Used bentoniteto return circulation


SH - SHELBY TUBE

CORE'- CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL




DATE START:4/10/90


BORING NO:SBB-12

SHEET NO.1 OF 1

PERSONNEL:ERIC BERCLUND

HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"




IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1343.6



TIME: ACTIVITY:

4/10/90

1400 HR1915 HR

4/11/90730 HRS930 HRS

MOVE TO AND SETUP AT LOCATIONCOMPLETE DRILLING AND SAMPLING

REAM HOLE AND BEGIN WELL CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

15 —

20 —J

25 —i

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

CORE

0.0-2.0/1.7 (FT)

3.0-4.0/0.3

SS-36 0.0-2.0' CLAY Dark brown, sitty1 CLAY with roots. (TOPSOIL).

stsxs

8.0-13.0/4.5 (FT)

13.0-18.0/5.5 (FT)

18.0-23.O/1.5 (FT)

35 —

40 —

• •••••in

tuning

•••••in

• •••••inin 11 tit t

I 2.0-3.3' DECOMPOSED GYPSUM RedishWMte, decomposed GYPSUM.

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCOKSTMtTLY WITH ANOVA OR H-NU.

3.3-23.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to veryfine grained SANDSTONE, weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite. Approximately topfoot decomposed.



SH - SHELBY TUBE




ORC SUPERFUKD SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA

DATE START:5/9/90


BORING NO:SBB-13

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"







TIME:

1630 HR

2000 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING

COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

3.0-2.0/1.2 (FT)S.0-5.0/1.5 (FT)

6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)

2.0 (FT)

12.0-14.0/2.0 (FT)

15.0-17.0/1.4 (FT)

18.0-20.0/2.0 (FT)

25.0-27.0/2.0 (FT)

50.0-32.O/1.2 (FT)

(0 ADVANCE10 REC.

+4.50

3.25

3.25

1.00

1.00

0.50

0.25

SS-132 0.0-2.0' CLAY Dark brown, stiff,

I slightly silty CLAY with rootsand pieces of tar.

SS-133

SS-134

2.0-11.0' CLAY Brown, stiff, veryslightly silty, slightly moist,CLAY with a few pieces of organicmaterial. Orange iron stainingbelow 8 feet.

NO ORGANIC VAPORSWERE DETECTED DURINGDRILLING OPERATIONS,WHICH WERE MONITOREDCONSTANTLY UITH ANOVA OR H-NU.

0.25

SS-135

lllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

11.0-15.0' CLAY Orange brown,soft, moist, slightly siltyCLAY. Below 12' becomes silty

—i and damp.

15.0-31.5' SAND Orange brown,silty, very fine, wet SAND. Fewpieces of organic materialscattered throughout.

inn in •in mil i• •••Illl I

III II III I

31.5-36.5' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE.



SH - SHELBY TUBE





DATE START:5/10/90


BORING NO:SBB-14

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2»-4 7/8"




)EPTH TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1354.6 FEET



TIME:

830 HR

1200 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING

COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —<

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

D.0-2.0/0.8 (FT)

5.0-5.0/1.6 (FT)

6.0-8.5/2.5 (FT)

5.0 (FT)

14.0-24.0/7.0 (FT)

4.00

2.50

3.50

0.0-2.0' FILL Dark brown, mottled-iwith light brown, clay FILL.

SS-137

SS-138

2.0-8.5' CLAY Medium brown,mottled with yellow brown, stiffto very stiff, slightly siltyCLAY, with a feu veinlete ofgypsun.


SSZSSS

ssss

8.5-18.0' GYPSUM Mottled offwhite, yellowish and pinkish,with areas of black staining(sulfate?), soft GYPSUM, randomfractures healed with fiberoussecondary gypsun. Top 2 inchestranslucent light orange white.

• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••••I• •••••III• •••••••I

18.0-24.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE. Very weaklycemented with calcite and ironoxide. 21.5-22.5 stronglycemented.



SH - SHELBY TUBE





DATE START:5/10/90


BORING NO:SBB-15

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"


DRILLER:. UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / UATER ROTARY

COORDINATES:N569235.2 El942073.1

IEPTN TO WATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION:1360.3 FEET



TIME:

1400 KR

2000 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING.

COMPLETE WELL CONSTRUCTION.

SKETCH:

DECOHTAWHATIOH: DRJU. RIG AND SAMPLING EQUVPHEKT DECOMED U1THSTEAM CLEANER BEFORE MOVING ON LOCATION.

LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


I

5 —I

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

SH

CORE

D.0-2.0/.3 (FT)S.0-5.0/1.6 (FT)

6.0-8.0/2.0 (FT)

9.0-11.O/1.2 (FT)

12.0-14.0/1.1 (FT)

15.0-17.0/1.2 (FT)

18.0-20.O/2.0 (FT)

25.0-30.0/1.1 (FT)

2.00

2.50

2.50

2.001.00

0.25

2.50

0.50

SS-139

SS-140

SS-U1

SS-142

SS-U3

SS-144

0.0-20.0' CLAY Dark brown to grayto mottled orange brown, stiffto soft, very slightly silty tosilty CLAY

Roots and organics to 8 feet.Stiff to 10 feet.Soft 10 to 15 and 18 to 20 feet.Silty 9 to 15 feet.Thin sheets of organic materialto 11 feet.

••••• nit

III II •••!

• •••••II •

20.0-30.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable; silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, very weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite, firm 29 to 30 feet.

At 9 feet detectedgas odor. Drillingwater read 7 ppm onh-nu. >5 ppm insampling areabreathing zone,sampling team startedusing resperators.Sample read 40 ppm.15 to 17 foot sampleread 170 ppm.18 to 20 foot sampleread 200 ppm.Core sample read17 ppm.

• ••••••I •• ••••III!

BOTTOM OF BORING AT 30 FEET* UNCONFINED

COMPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH -. SHELBY TUBE

CORE' - CARBIDE BITCORE BARREL




DATE START:5/21/90


BORING NO:SBB-16

SHEET NO.1 OF 2


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"



COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TINE: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME:5/21

5/22

ACTIVITY:MOVE TO AND SET UP AT LOCATION, BEGINDRILLING AND SAMPLING, CORED TO 32 FT.

CORED TO 47 FEET. E-LOGGED HOLE ANDCOMPLETED WELL CONSTRUCTION.

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHIN

FEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —i

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

3.0-2.0/1.0 (FT)J.0-5.0/1.3 <FT)

i.0-8.0/1.0 (FT)

12.0-17.0/4.4 (FT)

17.0-27.0/5.0 (FT)

170

171

KBOOOOOwAjy,f**fmr,AWJwWJvr*f*rtf*fiftf*rtftWWWWWVftfiTtf^if^ftftrtCTOWTCVPftftfiftrit*f*r*f*WJWWVV

0.0-9.0' FILL Red brown, siltyclay, sandy clay with gravel, andsandy clay FILL.

thrift f^ftfiftfttt\MIWVMv

9.0-40.5' GYPSUM White with blackstreaks, soft, phanic GYPSUM withfractures healed with secondary,fiberous gypsum.

Black oily substanceon drilling water at12 feet. H-nu read1.5 to 2.0 ppm offdrilling water. 0reading in breathingzone.

zsssstz

CORE

CORE

27.0-32.O/4.7 (FT)

52.0-41.O/6.0 (FT)

27 feet color changes to pinkgrayish white.

ssssss

40.4-40.5' red brown clay


SH - SHELBY TUBE



ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE: BORING NO: SBB-16 SHEET NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA SEE SHEET 1 2 OF 2

LOG Of BORING (CONTINUED)

DEPTHIN

FEET

40 —

---

45 —«•

--—50 —™"

-

55 —

60 —

SAMPLE

TYPE

CORE

REAM

RUN/RECOVERY

M.0-47.0/i.O (FT)

,7.0 TO>2.0 (FT)

TONS/ •SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

•EOLOGIC.OG

• •••••I I

ii tnii •mini •• iiiiiii• linn •• ••••••i• ••••in••••••••• •••••>•II II Illl

Illlllll

DESCRIPTION

40.5-52.0' SANDSTONE Redbrown, friable, silt sized tovery fine grained SANDSTONEweakly cemented with iron oxideand calcite.


.

COMMENTS

REAMED HOLE BECAUSEOF CAVING TO 52 FEETTO SET WELL.

*4 .


PROJECT HO.20510-060

ORC SUPERFIMD SITECYRIL, OKLAHOMA

DATE START:6/4/90


BORING NO:SBB-17

SHEET NO.1 OF 1


HOLE SIZE:5 1/2"-4 7/8"


DRILLER: UAYNE DRILLING EQUIPMENT/METHOD:G-D 1500 / HATER ROTARY

COORDINATES: IEPTH TO UATER/DATE-TIME: GROUND ELEVATION: GROUTING: CONSTRUCTED AS MONITORING WELLSEE CONSTRUCTION REPORT FOR DETAILS


TIME:

900 HR

1500 HR

ACTIVITY:

MOVED TO AND SETUP AT LOCATION, BEGANDRILLING AND SAMPLING.

COMPLETED MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION

SKETCH:


LOG OF BORING

DEPTHINFEET

SAMPLE

TYPE RUN/RECOVERY

TONS/ *SO FT

ASSIGNEDNUMBER

GEOLOGICGRAPHICLOG


5 —

10 —

15 —

20 —

25 —

30 —

35 —

40 —

SH

SH

CORE

CORE

CORE

J.0-2.0/3.4 (FT)J.0-5.0/2.0 (FT)

S.0-11.0/1.9 (FT)

11.0-16.0/.8 (FT)

16.0-26.O/S.7 (FT)

2.50

>4.00

D.0'-1.0' GRAVEL FILL

195 1.0'-5.5' CLAY Mediim gray, verystiff, dry, few scattered sandgrains, slightly silty CLAY


zszz

zsss

5.5'-21.7' GYPSUM Off white,soft, phanic GYPSUM, manyfractures healed with secondaryfiberous gypsun and clay(shale). Top 10 feet very softand easily broken, bottom 5 feetvery dense.

in •••••«in mill• •••••••I

CORE 26.0-31.O/D.O (FT)

21.7'-31.0' SANDSTONE Red brown,friable, silt sized to very finegrained SANDSTONE, very weaklycemented with iron oxide andcalcite to ireemented.

• •••••II •

• Illlllll

• ••*•••••

BOTTOM OF BORING AT 31 FEET* UNCON FINED

OPPRESSIVESTRENGTH

SH - SHELBY TUBE


llIIIII

l l1III1IIIIII

APPENDIX B

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORTS

MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT



ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 3/25/90 - 4/6/90 1BB-2

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D983.6 E1940867.8

DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)

_

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

Y f/

1-6' CLAY \ '/' '/f '/' '/' '/

.-20' GYPSUM 1 i/l/' 'III' 'III1 'III1 'III

10-141' 1 'IIISANDSTONE / '///

f 'III

NO SCALE

IT—

••M

T

IIIIIIII'/'1'/IIIIni/

\***^ **» ^**nrru_ii- MTWIHU • b • w

-1.9 1363.6

ftYPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL

f /t /> i1 1

i/ 1n in i

III! 1

an

t

i

• !••••Ill •• I

III •• I

III II I

^==

U 1II (

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1361.7

TYPE OF PROTECTIVE CASING:STEEL

^___ RfiTTflM fw ciErirp rictiin' L n • n^7 7

DIAMETER OF PROTECTIVE CASING: 8 INCHES

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:PUT CTUPnill F Aft

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES

DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 12 INCHES

TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:ccuTnutTC PEIICTC* f \lffl n AY\

DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: 7 7/8 INCHES

Tf¥> HP F1ITFP DAf¥ / DATTPU OF CFAI • 117 A MLL 1

W AF CTPPPIJ- 1?1 0 1?£fl 7

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . ^10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND " * '

)IAKETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,MACHINE SLOTTED, 0.020 INCH SLOTWIDTH 4 SLOTS PER INCH


PERSONNEL:ROTE BEENE


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/7-19/90 IBB-3

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N569031.6 E 1943340. 9


GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

1-27' CLAY / 1 f

1 ' if f f

f ' '1 If/1 HI1 III

!7-135' / HISANDSTONE 1 '//

/ '//f HI1 HI1 HI

'

'

NO SCALE

[J—

—

——

p

/

1

1

r

iii/ii'/u

-2.6 1330.4

fl•YPE OF SURFACE CASING:iTEEL

' ' GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1327.8

f f

f f

1 '

1 '/ 1

in 'uut

fi

i

i

i

• • •• •• • •• •in ii iin ii i==

1 1

TVDP nc DPOTPrriup rAcitift*

STEEL


TYPE OF RISER PIPE:^c MPMII p LS\ PUT

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES I D


TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:rPMPUT-RpyTnuiTP nfintrr

TYPE OF SEAL: BENTONITE PELLETSMuni ri AVH


——-TOP OF PtITPP PAf¥ / RnTTnu f\t *5iPAI • 1H^ H 17?^ A

W np creppy- in*i n 1?7? A

TYPE OF FILTER PACK:10/?0 COLDBADO SILICA SAUD ' ' *

)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES I D

TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC.MACHINE SLOTTED 0.020 INCH SLOTUIDTH L SLOTS PER IUCH

_^_^^_RnTTHM fir spBfFii- 1?1; *< i?n? R

_______ nniTriN nr TIITFB Piipr- 1?*; n i?n? fl


PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUHO


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 5/20-23/90 IBB-4

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567104.8 E1942637.0


GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

1-39' CLAY V ' '/

' ' '/' ' '/t ' '/1 '///1 'III1 'III' 'III1 'III

S9-140' t '///SANDSTONE ' '///

' 'III1 'III1 'III

p

NO SCALE

fl—

•

•

«^

^^m

••w

1

11IIIIIIiiiv/>IIfit//,II

1

prTPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL

f (f f

f fti ' — ,1 1 f L-U '

U 1</ '

Jill 1tlII

t

• •••

ttl ttl

••••••

• •t •• •1

U 1II f

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0



TYPE OF RISER PIPE:SCHEDULE 40 PVC

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES I. D.


TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:rFM£UT*fiPlITnU1TF ftDftlT

TYPE OF SEAL: BENTONITE PELLETSm/nt ri AY**


TOP OF FILTER PACK / BOTTOM OF SEAL* 109 0

TYPE OF FILTER PACK:m/?n rnincAnn SIIICA CAIID ~ .

.-- .T-

>IAKETER OF SCREEN: 4 INCHES I. D.

TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC,MACHINE SLOTTED, SLOT WIDTH 0.020",FOUR ROWS OF SLOTS FOUR SLOTS PERINCH.

MONITORING UELLCONSTRUCTION REPORT


LOCKING CAP -

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGICLOG

1.0-9.0' CLAY

'.0-138.0'SANDSTONE

f111111f/1111ff


ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/31/90-6/3/90 IBB-5

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC.

DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)n

r ff 't tf fif/<ii<iiuiinuiinuiininUI

NO SCALE

q—

•

1

f

7ilfUi/il

1 *^^ w «^w«» n»_il_- «»rM • nw •

1TPE OF SURFACE CASING:TEEL

i tt f

i r1 ' — L/ '/ '/ r

/// '

//II

• ••••• !•••

• •••I I

!•••• •'

/ i

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0



TYPE OF RISER PIPE:SCHEDULE 40 PVC

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 4 INCHES

DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE: U 7/8 INCHES

TYPE OF BACKFILL HATER I AL:CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:HFUTCUITF PFIIFTC rVHCIAYl


«»TOP OF FILTEP PA Of / BOTTOM OF ^FAl - 11^ 7

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: ' •10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND *

IIAMETER OF SCREEN: t INCHES

TYPE OF SCREEN: SCHEDULE 40 PVC,MACHINE SLOTTED, SLOT WIDTH 0.020"FOUR ROWS OF SLOTS FOUR SLOTS PERINCH




ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 3/12/90 SBB-1

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N568288.1 El 940825. 4


_

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

VII '/0-12 Ft. CLAY VII '/

\ll '/\ll '/

12-24.6 Ft.GYPSUM

24.6-31.5 Ft.SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

rpi

' t

' ' **i'

f

f

_.

—

—

—

—

•»ii••i ••in ••• •i ••=====

1-2.2' 1362.3

DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D

T

S

YPE OF SURFACE CASING:

TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1360.0f IIIf I/If IIIf 111

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES l.D.

.niAUFTPQ np Rdpr unr* c 7/ft tururc

TYPE OF BACKFILL MATERIAL:

CEMENT - BENT ON I TE GROUT

»"» nr <Fti - 17 L 1147 f,

TYPE OF SEAL:

BENTONITE PELLETS (VOLCLAY)

TOP OF rilTFR PACT / BOTTOM DF CF»I • 15 S 1\UL •>

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . /

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND - ••

)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SHEDULE 40,

. UIPUIUF SLOTTED 0 020 IUCH SLOT

WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH


PERSONNEL:ROYE BEENE


ORC SUPER FUND SITECYRIL. OKLAHOMA

DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.3/17/90 SBB-2

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N570592.8 E1941020.3


>-2' LOAM VI / II\ll '/

!-24' CLAY y/'l >'/

24-34' SANDSTONE

TT

//ffifff

ffr

—

—

—

—

—

—• • ••• • iiin ••• •• it

DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)SURFACE CASING: -2.1

-2.0 1365.9r> r,r »<>.t-n »i«r.

— DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES 6.D.

1

!

nrPE OF SURFACE CASING:

JEEL

/ III1 til1 'II1 'II

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE:

. niAHFTFp nP WP wrap.

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1363.9

SURFACE CASING: 3.9 1360.0

2 INCHES I.D

6 INCHES


CEMENT - BENTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:

^ •» TflP HP «;FAI • 1O fl \\LL 0


.

_

TYPE OF FILTER PACK:

BOTTOM OF SEAL: 22.0 1341.9

» Tno OP cr&EEu. ?L n mo o

• '.

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND ~/ I

>IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D. '^ ^^^ ^ ^ ' *

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC S

UAruiuc SLOTTED 0 020

WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INC

•

NO SCALE

CHEDULE 40,

INCH SLOT

H

OTTOM OF SCREEN: 34.0 1329.9

OF FILTER PACK: 34.0 "-• 1329.9

OTTOM OF BORING: 34.0 1329.9




ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCCYRIL, OKLAHOMA 3/24/90

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D891.5 E1940851.3

_

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-12.1' CLAY VII <lIII 'IIII '/HI '/

12. 1-20. V GYPSUM

20.1-35.5'SANDSTONE

T~P

'

*

'

'

f

1

t

1

1

—

™*

••tii••• ••• •• ••••• ••

DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.

T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE:f IIIf IIIf IIIf III

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.D

• hfAMFTFP fit RfiBP MDIF* S 7/ft fkirUFC


CEMENT * BENTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:


rno nr CIITCD B*nr / onTTni nr ecu .


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND

JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40.

• MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT


.

NO SCALE NOTE: CONSTRUCTED NEAR MONITORING WELL IBB-2

TION: MONITORING WELL NO.SBB-3

DEPTH TO WATER / DATE -TIME:

DEPTH (FT) ELEVATION (FT)-2.1

-2.0 1364.0

0.0 1362.0

2.97 1358.5

14.0 1348.0

17.9 1344.1

20.4 1341.6

t 0

35.4 1326.6

35.4 ..,. 1326.6

35.5 1326.5




ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 3/27/90 SBB-4

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: , DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N570807.1 E1941488.9



0-13' GYPSUM \ll 7\ll '/VII 7\ll \/

13-25' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

rp

ss

t m

I H

•>•••

•MH

M«I

^ H

1

'/7'/IIf

f

f

1

1

1

r

ifffff/ff

• I •• •

• •• II •

• II II I

III II I

-

1-2.6 1355.2


1

;

•YPE OF SURFACE CASING:

iTEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1352.6lll\t//\tintll\

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I. D

-DIAMETER OF BORE MQIF*



TYPE OF SEAL:


TOD OF MITPB DAfY / RflTTfld f\f CPAI . ft H 1TAA A


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . ..

tIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40,

MACHINE SLOTTED 0 020 INCH SLOT



PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGUMD


ORC SUPERFUUD SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-5

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N57D591.2 E1941958.3


_

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

'// 70-9 Ft. Ill '/

GYSUM '/I '/HI '/

9-20 Ft. SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

rpi

't' ' *Itf

_

—

—

—

—

—

• •• it• •• ••• ii ••in iisssssa

\-2.7 1354.9


T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1352.2t HIf IIIf IIIf III

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES t.O

-DtAMFTEB OF nncF imp. A 1/? IUCHFC


CEMENT - BEMTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:


— TOP OF FILTER PACT / BOTTOM OF SEAL • 8 0' 1344 2

-

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _ . , .


JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.


MACHINE SLOTTED 0 0?0 1UTH SLOT


___,^^_ BflTWM flF WBPFM- 10 0' 1T 1 ?




ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-6



-

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-14.7' CLAY III '/HI '/III '/III '1

14.7-15.0'GYPSUM

15.0-30.0'SANDSTONE

•

NO SCALE

rp

•a

^^

MH

1

f/II

II

t

i

t

I

1

1

I

f'

1

r

/

• I II 1

• 1 II I

=5S5

1-3.2 1352.4

• DIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES I.D.

1

!


iTEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1349.2IIIIIIIIIIII

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES O.D

•.niAMPTPO OP ft DPP imp- A 1 /9 ikiruipc



TYPE OF SEAL:


ffft nf FitTPQ PAW / RATTflM OF <IFAI • 11 R 1557 L


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND • _ . _ - . . j

I

)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D. • ;

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40, :

MAPMIUF SLOTTED 0 D?0 INCH SLOT


r,r,'rri**A f.r r f lTfD D*rr- 1ft fi ' 1119 ?

r*rmr*i nf fOV} \Ur.~ ^fl fl 1117 ?




ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/7/90 SBB-7

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567317.5 E 194 1363. 2


1

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-8.0' CLAY Hi '/III '/III '/HI '/

fl. 0-27.5' SAND

27.5-32.0'SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

•— p

f

*

'

'

f

••••ii ii•• ii••••=^=

I•2.5 1347.0


T

S

TPE OF SURFACE CASING:

TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1344.5f I//1 III1 Ulf Ul

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


• RIAMFTFP OF RflOP UfMP* A 1/9 IUCUPC



______ TUP r\r *FAI - T n nil *;

TYPE OF SEAL:


— _T(¥> OF FtlTFB PACK / RflTTCM OF SCAl • 5 ? 1339 3

TYPE OF FILTER PACK:• Y

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . - -

HAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.


MACHINE SLOTTED 0 D20 INCH SLOT





ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/8/90 SBB-8

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N567664.0 E1942980;!

DEPTH <FT) ELEVATION (FT)

.

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-28' SUT \~ll >/AND SAND \ll '/

VII 7\ll \l

28-60' CLAY

60-70' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

TT

f

f

f

»

f

1

I

1

1

f

f

/

1

f

1

I

f

I

f

f

•••.

—

—

• • ••

• • li

• • ••

• • ••==

I-2.8 1320.4


1

8

rYPE OF SURFACE CASING:

iTEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1317.6/ IIIf III1 III1 III

.

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES l.D

_ntiuFTPB at ROBP unf- ft 1/7 iyr*KFC


CEMENT - BEHTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:

BENTONITE PELLETS (VOL CLAY)

^^ TflP tit F1ITPP DArr / llflTTnM OF CPAI • ^ft A 1?^O fi

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: . ..

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND -. ,...

MAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.


MICHIUF SLOTTED 0 Q?0 IklCH SLOT


________ nnTTfw or "[rBPFiii- 7n n i?47 ft




ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 SBB-9

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO UATER / DATE-TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. W567058.2 E1942398.9


-~

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-1 ' SAND AND III '/SILT III '/

1-28' /// '/SANDSTONE t=i

NO SCALE

rp1

ft

7'/ft

i

!•••!

• •1 It •

• •• » 1

• •••••

==

I-4.1 1339.9


T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1335.8IIIIIIIIIIII

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES 1.0

-DIAMFTFB Of ROPF UCaf- A 1/? ItlCMFS



TYPE OF SEAL:


_— TflP OF FIITFB PAfY / ROTTQM OF SFAI • 11 n 132& 8

W Ot $TBFFI|. 1T fl 1^?? R



1IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.




______ RnTTHM Of STBFFM- ?R fl HD? R


*



ORC SUPER FUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/9/90 SBB-10




0-2' SAND \ll

2-5' CLAY \HIIIt=

5-9' SILT

9-40' CLAY

40-48' SAND

48-60' SANDSTONE

~fr

NO SCALE

r

////

••••ss

"T

ffiIftif

trf

ff

__

—

—

—

—

—

—Illl

II ••

• ••t

• • ••__C!

1-1.9 1323.5


1

!


ETEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1321.6f IIIf IIIf III/ III

_

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


_niAUPTFB OF nncF unr- A 1/9 ttirurc



TYPE OF SEAL:


^^ TOP OF F1LTPP PACIf / RflTTQM t\t ^FAI • LA 1 1775 5

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: .*s i


UAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.



WIDTH, 4 SLOTS PER INCH ;


PERSONNEL:ERIC BERCLUND


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 4/10/90 $88*11

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE -TIME:POOL DRILLING INC. N569021.0 E1943392.5


_.

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-2' SILT VII '/

2-27' CLAY \'l'l '/\ll \l

27-40' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

q— p

fi

ft

'

'

,

1

1

1

/

/

__

—

—

—

••• ••• ii •••mi• •• ••=^=

1-2.5 1330.4


T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1327.91 lll\t >//\f l/l\f llt\

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


_niAUPTFB OF ROPE UftC. A 1 /? TtiruPC



TYPE OF SEAL:


__TfY> OF FUTPfi PART / IMTTflM OF CPAt • ?5 0 1TH? 0

TYPE OF FILTER PACK:I

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND. - --

)IAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.


. MAPUIkJF SLOTTED 0 090 tUCM SLOT








GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

0-2' CLAY V//

2-3.3' \llDECOMPOSED \llGYPSUM t=t

3.3-23' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

r

////firf/fi/iifiiif/tf

••••

-Tl

titfrfff

fff

/it

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

11*11M ••!

• •••I

!• tft 1

J—l±

1

ivr wr «uf\rnuc. uvj*nu- c..

-2.2 1345.8


1

8

HTPE OF SURFACE CASING:

rTEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1343.61 lll\f f / / \1 tl/\1 t//\

'

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


• D1AMPTFP OF RflPP MAIF* A 1/9 IfclPUirc



TYPE OF SEAL:


_^_Tnp nc FttTFD p&fy / WITTIM nt <FAI • A o ITT A 7


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND _ _ . . . . ,

IIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.

TYPE OF SCREEN: PVC SCHEDULE 40.

UirMIUF SLOTTFD 0 (Ot\ luru 41 HT


•»*"'*~' nv Rntiiin- ?T n n?n ft







GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

1-15' CLAY VII '/III '/III '/III '/

15-31.5' SAND

(1.5-56.5'SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

T~T

IthItIt

—

•• it•i ii•i ••• ••t=

1-2.7 1352.3


1

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1349.61 III' HI' III1 HI

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


— niAUFTFD Rf RfWF HfHF" A tMfUFQ


CEMENT - BENTGN1TE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:


•"<* ne FIITBB OAnr / BflTTCM Of <F4l • OS 114Q 1


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND • . '.-'



Miruiuc SLOTTED 0 070 IUCM SLOT


IMONITORING WELL

CONSTRUCTION REPORT

PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGllMD


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL. OKLAHOMA 5/10/90 SBB-14

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIHE:POOL DRILLING INC. N568406.6 E1942044.0


GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

i-2.0' FILL Hi '/III 7

!. 0-8.5' CLAY III '/

1.5-18' GYPSUM

18-24' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

TT

t

t

t

1

I

1

§

t

§

1

t

—

—

—

—

—

—

• •tit• •• ••• ••ii••• ••==

I-2.1 1356.7

— ftlAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.

1

!

rYPE OF SURFACE CASING:

ITEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1354.6f IIIf IIIf III1 III

p

.

'

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


_niAMFTFP OF nnpF HttF* A turuFQ



»«*»« nc ecii T ^ ^ nio 1

TYPE OF SEAL:


T^» nc C1ITFQ PAClf / RflTTOM OF SFAl • fl 0 13&6 A

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: •'-

10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND '

JIAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES I.D.


turutyp CHITTED o o?o IUCH SLOT





ORC SUPERFUKD SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/10/90 SBB-15

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES: DEPTH TO WATER / DATE-TIHE:POOL DRILLING INC. N569235.2 E 1942073.1


-.-


i-20' CLAY V// '/VII 7\ll '/\ll\l

:0-30' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

TT

r

'

'

'

F

f

__

—

—

—

• • ••• •1 ••• fill• •1 ••S=S=

1•2.5 1362.8

BIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.

T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0 1360.3t III1 IIIf IIIf ni

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


-nt-MFTFB Of ROBE HOLE* A IIICHFS


CEMENT - BEHTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:


*>-> ne CIITCD p»rr / RnTTfM OP «C»I • 10 0 1TA1 7

TYPE OF FILTER PACK: - * .


HAMETER OF SCREEN: 2 INCHES l.D.


MACMIUE SLOTTED 0 020 IUCH SLOT


______ RniTrM nr srwru- in n n~n T


PERSONNEL:ERIC BERGLUHD


ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING WELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 5/21*22/90 SBB-16




)-9' FILL III '1Ill 7'// 7III '/

>-40.5' GTPSUN

0.5-52' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

TT

ffff/f1f

1f1

ffffff/f1

_

——

—

—

—

—"• 1 ••• 1 ••• 1 »«It ••J_—

1— BIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES O.D.

1

S

FTPE OF SURFACE CASING:

ETEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0f III( HI( IIIf III

.

-

'

.

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40

DIAMETER OF RISER PIPE: 2 INCHES I.I)

-DIAMFTFB Of WF Mm F- 7 7/R tUPUFQ



TYPE OF SEAL:


___ TOO nt FflTPP DAf¥ / ItflTTflM t\t CPA1 • T5 5


10/20 COLORADO SILICA SAND . . . , . - •



MACHtllF SLOTTED 0 020 IIICM SLOT


ttf*++r** ne ono i un- «;? n




ORC SUPERFUND SITE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: MONITORING UELL NO.CYRIL, OKLAHOMA 6/4/90 SBB-17



GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC

LOG

I- V,. FILL ' VII f/

1-5.5' CUT \'l'l ''/

V// '/

i.5-21.7' GYPSUM

11.7-32' SANDSTONE

NO SCALE

rp

SS

•

^M

^^

^^H

1

IIIIIIf/

,

f

f

• •••It

• •••••

• •••••

• •••• 11 '

\*_« » • •»«> K...I--

— - SIAMETER OF SURFACE CASING: 6 1/2 INCHES 0.0.

T

S


TEEL

GROUND SURFACE: 0.0

I/It/ln/'//

TYPE OF RISER PIPE:

PVC SCHEDULE 40


-DIAMETEB OF ROBE MOLE* A INCHES


CEMENT • BENTONITE GROUT

TYPE OF SEAL:


_THP Of FltTPD PAfY / BOTTOM Of SF*I * 1B 7 •







phase i field activities data summary report for …3-6 3-7 4-1 5-1 title phase i field activities...

Documents