pharmacogenomics: implications for cns drug development in the 21st century challenges for...

15
Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective Valerie A. Cwik, M.D. Senior VP – Research & Medical Director MDA

Upload: gervais-sherman

Post on 24-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century

Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Valerie A. Cwik, M.D.Senior VP – Research & Medical DirectorMDA

Page 2: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Rare diseases

Page 3: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Advances in Duchenne muscular dystrophy Described in 1868 Gene identified in 1986 Dystrophin identified 1987 Nearly all mutations now identified through

genetic testing 2009: gene therapy, stop codon readthrough

and exon skipping in human clinical trials ~15,000 individuals living with

Duchenne/Becker MD in the US Fewer than 250 currently participating in human

clinical trials for genetic based therapies

Page 4: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

“Current therapy is not sufficient for recovery”

Page 6: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Patient/family perspective

Too little focus on rare diseases

Too little funding Research moves too slowly Breakthroughs come too late

for many

Page 7: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Not enough focus or funding

Rare diseases Limited research

funding (governmental and non-governmental)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Millions of Dollars

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Muscular Dystrophy

Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Myotonic Dystrophy

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Myasthenia Gravis

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Multiple Sclerosis

Cervical Cancer

Cystic Fibrosis

Infertility

Smallpox

Anthrax

NIH 2008 Spending for Various Diseases

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Millions of Dollars

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Muscular Dystrophy

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Cancer

Heart Disease

Diabetes

NIH 2008 Spending on Various Diseases

Page 8: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to therapy development

Rare diseases Limited research funding

(governmental and non-governmental)

Bottlenecks in moving from the lab into humans

Limited interest from pharmaceutical companies

Designer drugs Finding potential study subjects Exclusion of potential study

subjects• “disenfranchised” groups

Page 9: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Basic Research Drug ScreeningTarget Identification

“Proof-of-Principle”Testing in Animals

Translational Research“Preclinical Drug

Development”Clinical ResearchIncluding Trials

MDA Funding in Millions

$54.4

$16.9

$7.6

$19.4

$5.0

MDA’s Research Portfolio - Bottlenecks

Page 10: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to therapy development

Rare diseases Limited research funding

(governmental and non-governmental)

Bottlenecks in moving from the lab into humans

Limited interest from pharmaceutical companies

Designer drugs Finding potential study subjects Exclusion of potential study

subjects• “disenfranchised” groups

Page 11: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to Therapy Development: Required Resources

Burden of disease studies Patient registries Natural history studies Genotyping Biomarkers Clinically meaningful

outcome measures

Page 12: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to developing outcome measures:

- define “clinically meaningful”- age of individuals- stage of disease- physical abilities- cognitive abilities

Page 13: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to therapy development: “legal” issues

Funding agency perspectiveScientific due diligenceFinancial due diligenceTech transfer/IP issues

Delays in initiation of clinical trials due to the time it takes for IRB approvals

Page 14: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

Challenges to therapy development: “technology” issues

Electronic communication is impacting the conduct of clinical trials (i.e., traditional research moves too slowly)

Social networking and on-line forums such as “Patients Like Me” --- sharing of information Off-label use of approved drugs

Page 15: Pharmacogenomics: Implications for CNS Drug Development in the 21st Century Challenges for Development & Approval – Patient & Funding Agency Perspective

What’s needed

More focus on and funding for rare diseases

Conduct needed studies – burden of disease, natural history studies, registry development, biomarker development, etc

Speed up the process Reduce bottlenecks

Expand studies to include as many patients as possible