pfas exposure and toxicology update...sep 25, 2019 · andrew smith, sm, scd state toxicologist...
TRANSCRIPT
Andrew Smith, SM, ScD
State Toxicologist
Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention
September 25, 2019
PFAS Exposure and Toxicology Update
PFAS Task Force Meeting
TOPICS
• What we know about PFAS exposure for “typical” child / adult
• What soil screening levels and soil monitoring data may tell us about exposure to Maine residents
• Update on toxicity values and water guidelines and standards
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Source:
National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals – US CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/index.html
Trends in PFAS Serum LevelsNational Perspective
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Source:
National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals – US CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/index.html
Differences in PFAS Serum Levels by Age Group
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Estimated Daily
Intake
1.5 ng/kg/day(105 ng/day)
0.4 ng/kg/day(28 ng/day)
Source:
National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals – US CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/index.html
Estimated PFOS Daily Exposure based on Serum Levels
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Source:
Egeghy & Lorber. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 150–168
Estimates of Major Sources of PFOS Exposure for the “Typical” Child / Adult
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
2-Year Old Adult
Range of
2015/2016
exposureRange of
2013/2014
3-5 yo
exposure
Source: US FDA 2019. Analytical Results for PFAS in 2019 Total Diet Study Sampling (Parts Per Trillion).
https://www.fda.gov/media/127852/download. Fruits and vegetables, breads and baked goods, and dairy were all < LLOQ.
Current PFOS Levels in Food(FDA 2019 Data)
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Tilapia,
baked
Turkey
ground,
pan-cooked
Shrimp,
boiled
Catfish,
pan-cooked
Salmon,
baked
Lamb chop,
pan-cooked
Cod, baked Chicken
thigh,
rosted
Beef steak,
broiled
Frankfurter,
boiled
PF
OS
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
ng
/g, w
w)
Results from PFAS in FDA's 2019 Total Diet Study Sampling
6-oz meal
per week
15-20
ng/day
6-oz meal
per week
4-6 ng/day
Thoughts on “Typical” Exposures
• Exposure to PFOS and PFOA have decreased 70-80 % since 2000.
• Diet for adults and Diet/Household dust for small children appear to be major sources of exposure
• For diet, seafood/meats appear to be major sources of exposure, especially seafood.
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Source:
Egeghy & Lorber. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2011) 21, 150–168
Potential Exposure from Contaminated Environments
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Intake
for RfDs
Intake
from
Water at
70 ng/L
AdultAdult
PFOS / PFOA
1700 µg/kg, dw
Remedial Action Guidelines: Based on USEPA RfD of 20 ng/kg/day, 95th
percentile incidental soil ingestion rate for a 1-6 year old child, 256 days / year.
PFOS Soil Screening Levels (SLs) for Residential Soil Exposure Pathway - 2018
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
PFOS
5.2 µg/kg
PFOA
2.5 µg/kg
Based on Chapter 418 risk standard of 0.5 HI, USEPA RSL tap water model modified
with use of SESOIL soil to groundwater model, and USEPA RfD , no RSC.
PFOS Soil SLs for Soil-to-Groundwater Exposure Pathway
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Ground water impacts from biosolids use?
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Composite Soil
Sample
18 µg/kg PFOS
3.5 µg/kg PFOA
Monitoring
Well Sample
170 ng/L PFOS
340 ng/L PFOA
What would be a PFOS soil screening level for the dairy farming scenario?
Soil → Hay/Corn → Cow → Milk → Child
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
USEPA PRGR Soil Screening Level Equation
Agronomic Pathway
������ =���
���� × ������� × ��������� × ������� × ������� +��� + ����� × ��������� × �������
Plant uptake and
soil loading
Fraction of time exposed
to contaminated feed
Animal ingestion rates
Transfer Factor
from Intake to
Milk
Source:
Modified equation from U.S. EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides, consumption of milk back calculated to soil -
https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/users_guide.html
Fraction of time exposed
to contaminated soil
Milk Action
Level
“Adulterated”
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Example Soil SL Calculation for Hay
Source:
Modified equation from U.S. EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides, consumption of milk back calculated to soil -
https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/users_guide.html
13,800 ng/kg dw
(13.8 µg/kg dw) 204 ng/kg
0.02
day/kg
6.5
kg/day
������ =���
���� × ������� × ��������� × ������� × ������� +��� + ����� × ��������� × �������
1
0.07 0.0340.13
kg/day
1
0.68 kg/day
1 0.5
0.065 kg/day
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Example Soil SL Calculation for Corn Silage
Source:
Modified equation from U.S. EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides, consumption of milk back calculated to soil -
https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/users_guide.html
������ =���
���� × ������� × ��������� × ������� × ������� +���
204 ng/kg
5,900 - 31,300 ng/kg dw
(5.9 - 31.7 µg/kg dw)
0.02
day/kg
8.7
kg/day
1
0.036 - 0.165 0.0014 - 0.034
1
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Example Soil Screening Levels
for Dairy Farm Scenarios
EPA “Subsistence Dairy Farm”
• Diet: Hay (65%) Corn (20%) Grain (15%)
SSL = 4 – 6 µg/kg, dw
Average Maine Dairy Farm
• Diet: Hay (28%) Corn (37%) Grain (35%)
SSL = 4 – 10 µg/kg, dw
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
PFOS Levels for Stoneridge Farm
151
759
99.5
878
ND
98.2
62.7
6.7
0.6
5.4
1.8
4.7
0.7
ND
Soil / Hay in µg/kg, dw
Water / Milk in ng/L
4.6
3.6
130
42
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Model Estimated PFOS Milk Levels based on
Stoneridge Farms Soil Levels
Stoneridge Farms PFOS site-wide soil level
estimates (ug/kg dry weight)
Model estimated PFOS milk
(ng/L)
123
(arithmetic average)4,100
25
(geometric mean)840
Initial average measured PFOS milk levels at Stoneridge Farms = 1,117 ng/L
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Thoughts on “Site” Exposures
Still thinking on this …….
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
?
Update on Toxicity Values for PFOS
Agency Endpoint Species
Human
equivalent
dose
(ng/kg/day)
Cumulative
uncertainty
factor
Reference
dose
(ng/kg/day)
FederalEPA Developmental effects Rats 510 30 20
ATSDR Developmental effects Rats 515 300 2*
States
ME, VT, CT† Developmental effects Rats 510 30 20
MA Developmental effects Rats 510 100 5*
MN Immune effects Mice 307 100 3
NH Immune effects Mice 302 100 3
MI Immune effects Mice 86 30 3*
NJ, NY, CA Immune effects Mice 55 30 2*
InternationalHealth Canada Liver effects Rats 1500 25 60
EFSA Changes in cholesterol Humans 2 1 2
* Proposed/Draft. † ME, VT, CT all using EPA’s toxicity value (FDA is also using EPA’s toxicity value).
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Cancer (10-5)
Risk Specific Dose
0.4 ng/kg/day
Other Drinking Water Guidelines for PFOS
* Proposed / Draft
Agency
Reference
dose
(ng/kg/day) Receptor
Drinking
water
intake
(L/kg/day)
Relative
source
contribution
(%)
Drinking
water
guideline
(ng/L)
FederalEPA 20 Lactating woman 0.054 20 70
ATSDR 2 Infant, birth to 1 yr 0.143 No RSC 14
States
VT 20 Bottle-fed infant 0.175 20 20
MA 5 Lactating woman 0.054 20 20*
MI 3 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 16*
MN 3 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 15
NH 3 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 15
NJ 2 Adult 0.029 20 13*
NY 2 Infant 0.151 60 10*
CA 2 Lifetime 0.053 20 7*
International Health Canada 60 Adult 0.021 20 600
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Update on Toxicity Values for PFOA
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Agency Endpoint Species
Human
equivalent
dose
(ng/kg/day)
Cumulative
uncertainty
factor
Reference
dose
(ng/kg/day)
FederalEPA Developmental effects Mice 5300 300 20
ATSDR Developmental effects Mice 821 300 3*
States
ME, VT, CT Developmental effects Mice 5300 300 20
MN Developmental effects Mice 5300 300 18
MA Developmental effects Mice 5300 1000 5*
MI Developmental effects Mice 1163 300 4*
NH Liver effects Mice 610 100 6
NJ Liver effects Mice 609 300 2*
NY Liver effects Mice - - 2*
CA Liver effects Mice 136 300 0.5*
InternationalHealth Canada Liver effects Rats 521 25 21
EFSA Changes in cholesterol Humans 1 1 1
Cancer (10-5)
Risk Specific Dose
0.1 ng/kg/day
* Proposed/Draft. † ME, VT, CT all using EPA’s toxicity value
Other Drinking Water Guidelines for PFOA
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
* Proposed / Draft
Agency
Reference
dose
(ng/kg/day) Receptor
Drinking
water
intake
(L/kg/day)
Relative
source
contribution
Drinking
water
guideline
(ng/L)
FederalEPA 20 Lactating woman 0.054 20 70
ATSDR 3 Infant birth to 1 yr 0.143 No RSC 21
States
VT 20 Bottle-fed infant 0.175 20 20
MA 5 Lactating woman 0.054 20 20*
MN 18 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 35
NJ 2 Adult 0.029 20 14*
NH 6 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 12
NY 2 Infant 0.151 60 10*
MI 4 Breastfed infant 0.047 50 8*
CA 0.5 Lifetime 0.053 20 2*
International Health Canada 21 Adult 0.021 20 200
Deriving a PFOS Toxicity Value for Immune System Effects
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
Benchmark Dose Modeling (BMD) of Dong et al., 2011 study of
decreased immune response in mice to sheep red blood cells
IgM
(n
g/m
l)
Serum PFOS (mg/L)
Toxicity Values for other PFAS
Maine Department of Health and Human Services
RfD = 4 ng/kg/day
Thomas Simones, PhDToxicologist
Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Questions?
Andrew Smith, SM, ScD
State Toxicologist
Maine Center for Disease
Control and Prevention