petrophysical evaluation well 34/10-17 - petrophysical evaluation well 34/10-17 january 1984 ... the...
TRANSCRIPT
Benne rapport tilhmer
PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION
WELL 34/10-17
JANUARY 1984
Den norske stab olieselskap a.S
[LASSIFICATION
MADE BY
Helga Buvik, Operation Technology LET/BER
SUBTITLE
I
PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION
WELL 34/10-17
JANUARY 1984
COMPLETED APPROVED
11, sr I XL+ x ~ c . 1 4 g - p ~ )JL /,.A
CONTENTS
Well Data
Introduction
Summary
Lithology
Log Quality
Input parameters
Computations
Coring Summary
Core and Log Data Comparisons
Discussion
Results
Page
Appendix
Operator :
Well:
Location:
Classification:
Drilling rig:
Spudded :
Rig released:
KB-elevation:
Water depth:
Total depth:
Drillers depth:
Dresser's depth:
Objective:
WELL DATA
Statoil
34/10-17
Exploration Well
Deep Sea Bergen
22 February 1983
8 July 1983
25m
137m
3453 mRKB
1.Middle Jurassic Brent
sandstones
2.Lower Jurassic Dunlin
and Statfjord sandstones
fig 1
INTRODUCTION
This was the first well drilled on the Beta structure of block
34/10. The primary objective was to evaluate possible
hydrocarbon accumulations in the Middle Jurassic Brent
sandstones. The secondary objective was the Lower Jurassic
Dunlin and Statfjord sandstones.
The purpose of this report is to give an evaluation of the
petrophysical properties of the Brent Group using electrical
logs and core data. The Dunlin and Statfjord sandstones were
considered not hydrocarbonbearing and were not evaluated.
SUMMARY
Hydrocarbons were encountered in the Brent sands (2684.5 - 3000 mRKB), mainly in the Tarbert and Ness Formation. The logs
indicate a gas and oilbearing sand with a net pay of 122.5 m.
The Hnetpay/Hgross ratio is 0.53 in the hydrocarbon-bearing
interval ( 2684.5 - 2914 mRKB ) , The Hnetpay/Hnetsand-ratio is
0.94. The sand has a average porosity of 22.5% and the- netp pay of 23%. The water-saturation in the pay-zone has an average of
27%.
The core porosity over the interval 2684.5 - 2965.54 mRKB, is 20% (the log porosity in this interval 17%). The log and core
porosity agrees well as a general rule, with only a slight
difference due to the overburden effect.
The FMT pressures indicates an oil-water contact at about 2914
mRXB - + 5m, which seems reasonable according to the log evaluation. The FMT-pressures suggest an gas-oil contact at
about 2862 - + 12m. (ref. FMT Report, Well 34/10-17, October 1983, Engineer Per Seim. ) Drillstemtests (ref. Well Testing Report,
34/10-17, Jan. 1984) performed in the Ness and Etive Formations
showed that the reservoir contained water, oil and gas.
Net Pay Statistics
Formation Thickness Avg,Porosity Avg . Sw Avg -Vsh
m % % %
Tarbert ' 25.50 24
Ness 97.00 23
Etive - - Rannoch - -
LITHOLOGY
Brent Group (2685 - 3000 mKB)
The Tarbert Formation (2685 - 2717 mKB)
The Tarbert Formation is composed of sandstone interbedded by
shales and some minor coal streaks. The sandstones consist of
quartz. The upper sandstone unit is typically medium to coarse,
well sorted, containing no calcareous cement or matrix. The
lower sandstone comprises a fine to medium grainsize,
occasionally very fine, well sorted, micaceous, generally
argillaceous with pyrite.
The shales are black, very carbonaceous with occasional mica and
pyrite inclusions.
The Ness Formation (2717 - 2934 mKB)
The lithology of the Ness Formation is characterized by good
sand layers with visual porosity, interbedded by shales and
coal. The sandstones generally described as quartz, very fine
to medium, predominantly very fine to fine, predominantly non
calcareous. The deeper part of the unit shows an increasing
degree of clay cementation, with traces of silica cement.
Layers of mica are common as well as fragments of coal. Pyrite
and glauconite are found as traces, particulary in the deeper
section of this unit.
The shales also have a good organic content in places and traces
of microcrystalline pyrite and mica are common.
The Etive Formation (2934 - 2936.5 mKB)
The Etive Formation is composed of a very fine to finely
grained, occasionally medium sandstone with well sorted quartz
grains. This unit contains less mica and has good visual
porosity.
The ~annoch Formation (2936.5 - 3000 mKB)
The lithology of the Rannoch Formation is a massive sandstone
unit with minor interbeds of siltstone. The sandstone is a
clear quartz sandstone, very fine to fine grains, occasional
medium to coarse, with slightly calcareous cement. The
siltstone has traces of microsrystalline mica. The siltstone
beds are described as having less calcareous cement. Good
visual porosity is seen throughout the unit.
f i g . 2
34/10 - 17 LITHOLOGY
DEPTH (m RKB)
WATER DEPTH 137 m
MIOCENE .. ..
OLIGOCENE
EOCENE " '
- I762 v v v v . v v v v .
PALEOCENE I-
. . - . . .=:: DUNLIN I
a a, k 0 -
HEATHER FM
DRAKE FM 1-1
COOK FM I=l
AMUNDSEN FY
LOG QUALITY
In general the logs are of good quality but there are certain
things one should consider before evaluating the logs,
Due to sticking the density and neutron log is less accurate in
the interval 2855 - 2875 mRKB. The GR from the
DIFL-BHC-Acoustic log is used in this particular interval, The
caliper from the DLL is preferred, since the caliper from the
Densilog, Neutron and GR is reading slightly too high,
The caliper of the DIFL-BHC-Acoustic log is 0.3 too high. There
is also slight sticking on this log but with no or little
influence on the logs. The Densilog, Neutron and GR is depth
shifted to match DIFL-BHC-Acoustic log. In addition there are
large washouts down to 2685 mRKB.
INPUT PARAMETERS
Formation Temperature
,
When corrected for borehole conditions the maximum temperature
of the particular logging run was used. The formation
temperature for later calculations, 92Oc, was obtained from
the logs.
Formation Water Resistivity (Rw)
A value of 0.079 ohm at 92 OC was chosen from the result from
a watersample from DST no.1. and controlled by calculations
with Rwa, ratiomethod and SP. This is equivalent to a
salinity of approximately 34000 ppm NaC1.
Mud Properties
The following values are reported by Dresser Atlas (Dual
Laterolog, Micro Laterolog, Gamma Ray, run no.1, 01.05.83):
Rm 0.330 o h m at 25.6OC
Rmf 0.177 o h at 22.2OC
Rmc 0.650 ohmm at 23 .gOc
This is equivalent to:
Rm 0.140 ohmm at 92'~
Rmf 0.072 o h m at 92'~
Rmc 0.260 o h at 92OC
Hydrocarbon Density
The densities from the FMT report were used:
gas gradient: 0.149 g/cc 7 U
oil gradient: 0.61 g/cc
In the waterbearing zones a HC-density of 0.8 g/cc of possible
residual hydro-carbons, was assumed.
True Resistivity (Rt and Rxo)
The dual laterolog, corrected for invasion effects, is used for
Rt determinations in the hydrocarbonbearing zone.
The induction log is used in the waterbearing zone below the
assumed water-oil contact at 2914 mRXB.
The RMLL, corrected for mudcake effects, is used as a Rxo
curve.
Shale Parameters
The shale parameters were picked from crossplots, histograms and
visual inspection of the logs. The parameters from the Dunlin
Group were dominating.
RhObshale Neutronshale Rshale 2650 - 2701 mRKB 2.36 0.44 2.2
2701 - 2734 mRKB 2.52 0.44 2.2
2734 - 2850 mRKB 2.56 0.50 2.2
2850 - 2914 mRKB 2.52 0.44 2.2
2914 - 3010 mRKB 2.52 0.44 2.5
COMPUTATIONS
Shale Volume
The Density/Neutron crossplot and the GR are the main shale
indicators, but supplemented with the Sonic/neutron crossplot
( A tsh varying from 107 - 85 P sec/ft) or/and the Thorium or Thorium/Potassium curve in some sections.
The final shale volume used for further computations is picked
as the minimum,
The Tarbert and Rannoch sands caused some problems because of
mica content. In addition the Rannoch Formation contained some
zirkon enriched layers.
Porosity
The porosity is calculated with a complex lithology model using
density and neutron logs with following matrix parameters.
RHOB PHIN
Quartz 2.65 -0.035
Heavy mineral 2.83 0.20
Fluid 1.0 1.0
The Ness Formation
Quartz : 2.68
The heavy mineral (assumed to be muscovite) value is picked from
tables over log responses.
An exception from this model is the Rannoch Formation where a
limestone-sandstone model was used with following matrix
parameters.
RHOB PHIN
Quartz : 2-65 -0.35
Limestone: 2.71 0.00
Water Saturation
The Indonesia equation is used for Sw calculation:
True Resistivity
Formation Water Resistivity
Water Saturation
Shale Resistivity
Shale Volume
Porosity
Cementation Exponent ( 2.0 )
Saturation Exponent (2.0 )
Lithology Factor ( 1.0 )
CORING SUMMARY
A t o t a l of 16 cores were c u t i n t h e Brent Group. There were
d i f f i c u l t i e s i n c o r r e l a t i n g t h e coredepth with t h e logdepth. A
core tends t o increase i t s length some , through handling a f t e r
a c t u a l l y it has been d r i l l e d . When t h e r e i s 100% recovery and
f a i r l y reasonable co r re la t ion between loggers depth and d r i l l e r s
depth ,some c o r r e l a t i o n problems may occur. This i s t h e case of
34/10-17. I n p a r t s t h e core was too l a r g e and i n a few places
it even overlapped.
The c o r r e l a t i o n presented i s considered t h e most reasonable one
with a maximum dep thsh i f t of 2 0.60 m.
Core no. D r i l l e r s depth " Shrink- Depth Log-correlated age" s h i f t depths
m RKB m m m RKB
f o r t s . * A t t h e end of t h e i n t e r v a l -
14
Core no. D r i l l e r s depth "Shrink- Depth Log-correlated age " S h i f t depths -
m RKB m m m RKB
CORE AND LOGDATA COMPARISONS
Crossplots were made in order to evaluate the relations between
the log and core parameters. The calculations are based on the
least square method. The results are:
Interval
Total : PORHE= 0.63PHIF + 0.09
Tarbert Fm. : PORHE= 0.58PHIF + 0.11
Ness Fm. : PORHE= 0.61PHIF + 0.09
Etive and Rannoch Fm. : PORHE= 0.43PHIF + 0.14
Total : PORHE= 0.04logKLH + 0.16
Tarbert Fm. : PORHE= 0.03logKLH + 0.17
Ness Fm. : PORHE= 0.03logKLH + 0.15
Etive and Rannoch Fm. : PORHE= 0.03logKLH + 0.17
Total : PORHE= 0.03logKLV + 0.18
Tarbert Fm. : PORHE= 0.03logKLV + 0.20
Ness Fm. : PORHE= 0.03logKLV + 0.16
Etive and Rannoch Fm. : PORHE= 0.02logKLV + 0.19
Total : . PHIF = 0.03logKLV + 0.15
Tarbert Fm. : PHIF = 0.02logKLV + 0.18
Ness Fm. : PHIF = 0.03logKLV + 0.15
Etive and Rannoch Fm. : PHIF = 0.03logKLV + 0.16
Total : PHIF = 0.03logKLH + 0.13
Tabert Fm. : PHIF = 0.OllogKLH + 0.19
Ness Fm. : PHIF = 0.03logKLH + 0.13
Etive and Rannoch Fm. : PHIF = 0.04logKLH + 0.14
PHIF = Final log porosity
PORHE = Helium core porosity
KLH = Horizontal core permeability
KLV = .Vertical core permeability
Comment The core porosity/permeability are not corrected for the
overburden effect.
9.00.03 16
LOG PERMEABILITY
The "KLOGH1' and the "KLOGV" curves are not pure log-calculated
permeability. Into the relationships between PORHE and YLH/KLV,
obtained by crossplots, we substituted the log porosity PHIF and
calculated the KLOGH/KLOGV values . These curves were created
due to cosmetic reasons.
DISCUSSION
The main problem in this well is the content of mica and heavy
mineral in the Tarbert and Rannoch Formations. The difference
in core and log porosity at some minor intervals is due to this
content. The Thorium and Thorium/Potassium curves from the
Spectralog were used with varying success and only included in
the shale computations in minor intervals of the Tarbert and
Rannoch Formations.
In general the log and core porosity of the sands agree well
with only a difference due to the overburden effect.
In the sand at 2870 mRKB, two meters of high porosity sand were
lost due to sticking problems. An assumed porosity was given.
Some coalbeds, displaying core porosity, were given assumed
porosity values, but in general the coal porosity and
hydrocarbonsaturation were filtered to give the value 0. These
coals are believed to be non-productive.
Dresser Atlas is a fairly new company working for Statoil and
have some differences of borehole corrections etc. which our
log-analysis system is not adapted too.
Results
The petrophysical parameters are as follows:
1 ?
Formation
interval
( m M B
Total Brent Fm. r====l 1 Ness Mb. I
(271 7-2934)
Etive Mb.
Cut off criteria
Net sand: Vsh > 0.40 @ < 0.12
Net pay: Vsh > 0.40 < 0.12
Sw > 0.65
APPEND I X
STATISTICS SENSITIVITY-PLOT CROSSPLOTS LISTING CPI
STATISTICS
fff 4-€-4-
* rn*
Y U* * MY * +* * w * * u* * I-* * a* * l-* * m* *
n w w C*Z*
*x* W k O * *-* L W S *
*C*
CROSS-PLOTS
HEATHER SHALE
RHOB VS PHINJ DT VS PHIN RHOB VS D T PHIN VS GR RHOB VS GR JDT VS GR R T VS GR
R H 0 a
JELL Y&UI
-e:ese e:ese disc &se e:~se d4se PHIH
$34-18-17HB DEPTH: 2650.88 2684.58 TOTILI 48 8.4262 V.I)UI 2.3828
P L O T T E D B V t H8
- e k e e:ese e k e ekse e:se e:450 MI14
WECt $34-10-17HB DEPTH: 26S8.88 2684.58 TOTILt 48 X,AUI 8.4asa Y.N: 187.5388
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
", UELL 534-Ll-17H8 DEPTH: 2658.88 2684.59 TOTIL: 139 X.AUI 187.4294 Y.IIUI 2.3756
P L O T T E D B Y : HE
P L O T T E D B Y 4 HB
; + + + + + 4e.&?@ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e:me 3e:eee se:eee ga:aee m:aee 1se:eer GR
UELL 534-18-17HB DEPTHI SS58.00 2684.58 TOTRLt 139 X.AUX 98.1095 Y.AU: 187.4294
MILL 934-18-17HB DEWHE 2669.00 2684.58 TOTAL% 124 X.wr ,98.4978 Y.NI 8.4548
P L O T T E D B Y 1 HB
+ + + + + + 0.000 -+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
e:em 3e:eee dace 99:ew 12e:eee 1se:eo CR
WTLL 534-1e117HB DEPTH* 2658.08 2684.50 TOTAL1 139 x . ~ u t $8.1896 Y,AVr 1.9155
CROSS-PLOTS
DUNLIN SHALE
R H O B VS PHINJ DT VS PHIN R H O B VS DT J PHIN VS GR
R H O B VS G R JDT VS G R
RT VS GR
+.ow B:BSB e:m e k e &se 0:450 -- PHIN rs--o-,7HB DEPTH: 2995.00 3010.88 TOTAL: 61
2 3720 Y . k V t 2.5423
L O i T E D B Y : HB
- e k e desa e:ise 0:250 4350 e:450 WIN
& L L n4-te-I~HB DEPTH: a9gs.08 3eie.80 TOTAL: 61 X.iW 4.3730 Y.AV: 91.3975
' P L O T T E D B Y I HB
". UELL 534-10-17HB DEPTH: 2995.00 3810.00 TOTAL: 61 X.AU1 913975 Y.RU1 2.5423
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
.. , 344f-17HB PHIN US M ( i W 6 , .,, . 14 1 1256989861 . *.sew -++t+-i+tw++++tttt+tt+++t++++ttt+ttttttt+t+++
e:eee ae:eee se:aee se:eee 1ae:eee &em OR
UELt 534-10-17HB DEPTH: 2995.00 3010.00 TOTAL* 61 X.AU3 97.7247 Y.RUX 2.5423
*:we 30:eee fie:eee 9e:ese 12e:eee iso:see GR
WELL 534-19-17HB DEPTH: 2995.80 3018.00 TOTAL: 61 &.RU? 97.7247 Y.AUt 91.3975
CR UELL 534-10-17HB DEPTH: 2995.89 3010.00 TOTRL: 61 X.AU: 97.7247 V.hUr 2.8095
P L O T T E D B Y r HB P L O T T E D B Y : HE
CROSS-PLOTS
TARBERT MEMBER
RHOB VS PHINJ DT VS PHIN RHOB VS DT r PHIN VS GR RHOB VS GR rDT VS GR RT VS GR
, . . ... 3
j . . .,yf;'; ,.. 034--!ti7Ht DT US PHIN ( 2684. * .. ,,.. , . I . I .. . 434636347598379221 1221 1 223 - i*.m -t+ttttt~+t*+.r+*+t+tttttt+tttttttttt+t+t+ttttt+tttt
t t t t t t t t + t t t
" '.'. .. Pb,#*I. t t tl t t r 1 t t t
. t t t i t t tl . . t t' + I l l t t3 t t + 1 2 1 t +4 + t + 1 11t + 1 t4 t t + 1 1 t t ti2
128.880 -t+t+ttccttt++t+++t++ttttttitt~tttttttt+tt+tttt+t+tt2 + t + I t t +I t t t t
t l t 2 1 2t6 1 t 12 11 t 1 t7 + t + it iii i ti L +a
t + t 132 21 ti 1 +ti t t t 11212 t t7 t t ti 12 1 23621 t 11+21
D + t t 1 all+ 11 1 I+ +9 T t t I set 3111 a + ti4
1rn.808 -tttt++ttttttttttt+++i1i2tttttt+t+tttt++t+tt++t+t++t5 + t 111 t + t3 t t 1. t + tt t t + t t + t t + t t t t t t t t + t t t t + t t + t t t t t + t + + + t t t t +
80.008 -++ttt+ttt+ttttttt+ttttt+tttttttt+++ttt+ttttt+t+tttt + t + t t + + t * + t t t t t t t t t + t t t t + t t t + t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + t t t t t t + t t +
68.088 -ttttt+ttttttt++tt+ttt++tttttttt+ttttttttt*tt~+tt+t t t + + + t t + t t t t + t + t . t t t t + t t t + t t t t + t t + t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t + t + t t t
48.800 -ttttt+ttttt+t+*++tt++tttt+ttt+ttt+tttttttt+t++tt+tt
4 e s e e k e %:is8 e k e e k e L45e PHIn
UELL ' $34-10-i7HB DEPTH1 2684.50 2717.88 TOT&L: 110 X.IW:, $.26.29 YAU: 118.7988
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
UELL 534-18-17HB DEPTH: 2684.50 2717.00 TQTRLl 127 X.hUI 111.1897 Y.AUI 2.1612
P L O T T E D B Y 2 HB
WELL X.AU:
P
8:068 38:888 68:888 98:888 1 2 8 : ~ ~ ~ 158:866 OR
534-18-17HB DEPTH: 2684.58 2717.88 TOThL: 129 58.6482 Y.hUI 2.1680
L O T T E D B Y : HB
e:see o e h e w:ew w:we i a e h o iss:eee GR
UELL 534-10-17HB DEPTH: 2684.58 1717.88 TOTAL: 129 X.AUr 58.6283 'I.icU: ill.4122
. - + + + + + + + + ti + + tl + + t + + t i + : + +a *2 + + t 1 + +1 + + t + + +
P + + + + + t 1 1 1 : t H +I +a I 8.368 -t++++++++tt+t++tttY++++++++t++++++t++++++++++t+++2
n + + 32 22 t t +9 t + 21 121 + t t7 + 1 a 1 3 + t t i 3 + + t : 1 , 3 2 1 12122 t
t 8 + + t9 + 11 2 +1 + t 5
t + 23 + l I t + +7 + + 1111 + + + t4 + + 3 t + t +3 6.288 -++++++++*+++1+212+++t+++t+t+++***+~+++t+t++t+6
+ + 121 t + + + +la 13 + + + t4
+7 + + t + + l B i : t + +4 t +12 t + + +3
t 7' + + + t4 + t + + + + + + + t + + + t + + +
'3.188 ................................................... + + t + + t + + + + + + t + + + t + + t + t + + + t t + + t + + t t t + + t + + + + t + + + + t + + + + + t
0.880 -++++++++*++t+++t++u++++t+++++++++++t++++t++t+++t+t
ehee 3e:eee 6e:aee o e h e r2e:eee ise:eee OR
UELL 534-IB-17HB DEPTH: 2684.58 2717.88 TOTISL: 126 X.flUf 57.4181 Y'Wl 8.2853
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
P L O T T E D B Y : HB P L O T T E D B Y 1 HB
CROSS-PLOTS
NESS MEMBER
RHOB VS PHIN, DT VS PHIN RHOB VS DT , PHIN VS GR
RHOB VS GR IDT VS GR RT VS GR
t t + t t + -tt++t*t+t++++++t+++**+****t++t+i***t*++++tt1tt+++*+g t + t t + 1 +I t + + + t t t t ill + + 1 t4 + + + 3 2 2 1 + I + 1 +la t t + 3843 12 + *2l + + t 346752811 I t +32 t + t 644755138 2 + 1 1+41 + + + 434471853211 + 1 +53 t + + 13457841111 + H I *39
-tttt~t+tttt++++t+t+tt+++tl1+6842113l+++tltl+lt+++t+3i + t t 1 1 7324412 1 + 1 1 t28 t t + 1 14374331 *l 1 1 +30 + + t 1247A12l + t30 t t 2 31453411 + l+25 t t t 11 326533 1 11 1 +28 + t t 132243431 2 +1 +26 t t + 1 52442113 1 11 t26 t + + 1 1+153331222+ 1 t25 t t + 31258 212% 1211 1t3S -ttt+ttttttt++t+++tt++t+++++++3336342ti13412++++++++36 t + + 114316 5a 323333114 t46 t t ti I 331529 36463153 aai 2+64 t + + 12+3215243 332231P342 t48 t t + 1211346131343 ill1 t37 t + + 1 1 11211411131122 1 t25 + t t 1 1+111 112 +ti1 21111+18 t + + 4 11312+ 1111 tl2 + + t 1 +a 11 +li 1 1 +s
-0:ese &se e:se a:ase e : m 01458 PHIN
OELL 534-18-17H8 DEPTH: 2727.88 2934.88 TOTAL: 791 XAUI 8.2845 Y.RU1 2.3218
P L O T T E D B Y 1 UB
4t++++++tti++t+tt+++j+++++tttti+++++itt+tt+i++titii + t + 11112l + 4 + t + ill 1 11 t I 1 4 t + + + 1 4 2 1 1 4
+ + + + t 68.088 -tt+t+ttt+t+tt++t++t+++t+++++++t++++ttttt+++t+++tt~
t + + + + 3 + + + t + 4 + + + + + 4 + t + t + I + t t + + 4 t + + t t + t + + t + + + t t + + + + +
40.800 -+t+ttttt+tt+tt+++~t+~tt+t+t+t++ttttt++t+ttt~++++~
- e k e e:esct a : m e:ase e:~ss e PHIH
UELL S34-18-17HB DEPTH: 2717.88 2934.08 TOTAL: X.AVt 8.2850 Y.AV: 98.2186
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
" I UELL 534-18-17HB DEPTH: 8717.08 ~934.88 TOT~L: 853 X.bur 98.7981 Y-RU: 2.3140
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
+ t + + + + t + t t + t + + + 4 + t
ETt + t 1 StE + + 22t t 2 11TBStTfl + t
a+ + + t t r a ~ n + + Lt t + 2 2 2 1 + +
91t + + E2 2 IBEBI + t 0It+t++++++++++t+++++t+++1E1+211+1++t++++++t+++ttt+tt- 91+ t t 121 S2221 + + S1t + t 2212E 224 1 + + 8E+ + TTEILS2EBf2 I €1 71 + t 6Et + 1 12S9t11EE22f1111E + t BE+ t EICSE2?22 EE 2 + t C2+ + r2 EtIE9114 11 t + S2+ t BCE221ElE €2 + + CE+ + 1E19C2 EE2EEI i! t + 6B+ + ttC2C212SWTI t t 22++*++++t++++++++++++IT1L1+11TtEE+r++r+t+++t+t++t- st+ + + ~ ~ K Z I E T T I T T I T ~ t t EI+ t + ~ t r a raw1 r r + t CS+ t + ~ S T I rar r + + 02t t + t2E111221 1 11 + + tl+ + + E EE fl 1 + t Crt t + C E f T l f K I 1 + 8It + + E 2 L l l + 2 1 I + t El+ t * SE28111117 t t 81 + + + 2211Il+ 11 + t
S+**t+~+++++t+++++tttt+t+t~+T+1+++11++t+1++t++t+tt++- 9+ + t I r n I 1 + +
@I* t c 112 1 1 E rt t st + + 7 1 t T T 1 t + st t + 1 1 1 r 1 + t Ct t + 1 t1 I Tt t E* t + I t 1 f + + L* + + 1 s t 1 + t L* + El +1 1 1+ t Lt + + 12211 + t r++++t+t+t++++++t+++++++tttt~+tt++t+++++++tt+tt+tt+t- t+ t + 11 1 'It + Et + + I t 1 1 t + 6+ t + lEI1 1 N + L* t + 1 tar + + t * : 2+ K*
CROSS-PLOTS
ETIVE MEMBER + RANMOCH MEMBER
RHOB VS PHINj DT VS PHIN RHOB VS DT j PHIN VS GR RHOB VS GR jDT VS GR RT VS GR
-e:esa e k e e:ise e k s e e : m el450 PHIH
UELL 534-18-17HB DEPTH: 2934.80 3090.68 T0711L: 265 X.60: 8.2757 Y.WI 2.3589
P L O T T E D B Y t HI
-a:- e:ese e:iss e:ise e k e s:45e PHIN
E L L 934-10-17HB DEPTH: 2934.88 3880.80 TOTfiLt 265 X.AVI 8 .2Z7 Y . ( W t 89.9636
P L O T T E D B Y * HB
". UELL 534-10-17H8 DEPTHt 2934.89 3888.88 TOTAL: 265 X.hU% 89.9636 Y.AG1 8.3588
UELL I.*-17HB DEPTH: 2934.08 3800.00 TOTAL: 265 X.Wl 68.4290 Y.AUF 2.3588
P L O T T E D B Y : HB
E L L 534-10-171.18 DEPTH: 2934.08 3000.88 TOTAL: 265 x.Aur 68.4898 V.AUI 89.9636
+ + + + + 0.108 -++u+++++++++++t+++++++++++M++++++++++++++++++++
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + t + + + + + + + + + +
0.e0e -++*+*++**+++++++++*t+++++++*++cc+*
ohee 3e:eee eo:ooe se:eee iae:eee ie
UCLL S34-10-17HB QR DEPTH, 8934.08 3880.08 TOTAL1 XiRUr 68.4299 Y A W 0.27S7
P L O T T E D B Y : HE
&ee 3e:eee so:eee oe:eee ~ae:oee is GR
UELL 57440-17HB DEPTH* 2934.80 3008.08 TOTAL: X.AVt 68.4- Y.AUs 1.7436
P L O T T E D B Y : HB P L O T T E D B Y 1 HE
CROSS-PLOTS
CORE-POROS ITY j PORHE VS
LOG-POROS ITY J PHIF
- . . Y-FIXKtB A- 8.58491855 8 * B e 11635433 C2*
DO 'rOU VANT TO .DELETE INY POINTS? N O ' . ' . : - - . . . .
CROSS-PLOTS
CORE POROSITY, PORHE VS
CORE-PERMEAB I LITY J HOR I ZONTALJ KLH
CROSS-PLOTS
CORE-POROSITYJ PORHE vs
CORE-PERMEABI LITY J VERTI CALI KLV
(0 a, ffl
CROSS-PLOTS
LOG-POROS ITY j PH I F VS
CORE-PERMEABI LITYJ KLV
m > + 2 - u 2%,, bmf- 0 " W -Id4 wmw
g %= 4 =-4:
I I I 1 I 'In. I I I u :
I I L 1 rl
CROSS-PLOTS
LOG-POROS ITY, PHIF VS
CORE-PERMEAB I LITY HORIZONTAL, KLH
' I - t a a.
- - b * - l z i L - . 3 & " ,?Z cr: ,nr m z b-s 3 c LrI Lr, G.\r L l Z l r " m C r \ - 3 L n , 2-l -- ~ ' P . : - - , L = ~ * ~ ~ & = ~ J ~ \ L C N ; ~ - ~ ~ ' ; L ; ; C ; I % L A % = ' 4 r ' ~ 2 3 ~ . ~ . - . % ? n J , - \ - m a m m m m m m m a m a m m e m @ a # m m m m a m o m m a * Z d C 3'0\\Lb; -5,:.TO1;-10\ > 3 = = f r - c r N C \ I ' d N M * . * P > ~ t _ U - 2 L \ b . b L n - L . - \ L * . \ \ \ \ L 1 - L x - 2 A X x*c::--. L : : : x -- .,.;C3.-,"-̂ C 2 ".-h.L-LkL-Lk\ .& % \ & \ \ \ \ bb.- L'L - \ ' L - * %'k\\'L\\*-\
-J -U 'J '2 -4 2' .\' "J -4 U \ U 1 J ?,Y -4 'u -2 ?' 8% -4 *J CP* CJ N -4 Y W ?J Y Cr II Y N P , X J
N ? Z c',< U 3 X b C . J c R \ - 3 . G .*..cC-Zi'd.-TC; ~XY-uV.,ChCk.-P.I\f7~.*~:CIu,~\-- 4 -7 = W-
:1 -7 3 . c - G . 3 v2.C -Z C k 2 .nu r:'- 47.3 e m . * * a m . . . . . . . . a m e * .
2 c ? ' = = ~ C = 7 t t ~ z = = S f = 2 = -
- - p , I Y 1 b * , f i t ~ ~ . ~ ~ Z 3 t * l > ~ ~ - ~ u - ~ h ~ \ f - < \ C C 3 , L r : r \ . C L ? - l . + 3 : L T , K , ~ ~ A = 3 0 e ". ~ - ~ - J ~ ~ J . ~ ~ - + . - J W * - ~ N W ~ J N ~ ~ C U ~ U
. . * * . . a . . m e b e . a * . . . ... - - , , 1 ~ ~ = 3 z - 5 3 = S ~ S = 3 ' 5 3 z T z
-- : 1-. z- * = m .. = c : . n - r : -L - s e e . . - -.; .-.A C, CJ ir-. - - * - - - I- - - -.- - - - - - - * 3 . - p s . -
-J %' ?d .v ?1