petition against vikas gupta, ias, for defamatory activities

8/19/2019 Petition against Vikas Gupta, IAS, for defamatory activities

1/41

Naresh Kadyan, non official Member, State Committee for Slaughter Houses,

Department of Urban and Local Bodies (Govt. of Haryana) agenda items for

the meeting, to be held on 19-2-16: Resignation under protest.

I have gone through the agenda supplied by the Department, which wasneither prepared nor endorsed by the Member Convener, appointed by the

court of law, whereas I have not received the complaint of then Commissioner

of Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon. I welcome the item for the terms of non

official members of this committee because there was no mechanism for the

terms along with the sitting fee, TA and DA for non officials, I tried my best to

perform, besides the non cooperation of the field functionaries, like Sh. Vikas

Gupta, IAS and Sh. Shakti Singh, HCS, under protest, because these Govt.

officials, doesn’t want to perform and failed to work, as per orders passed by

the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, keeping in view the Swach Haryana,

matter was taken up with the DoPT twice, hence I offer my resignation from

this committee under protest and I will submit my observations before the

court of law. It is further intimated to the house that I have lodged many

FIR’s against the unlawful slaughter houses, keeping in view the duties and

functions decided by the court of law, hence I may kindly be allowed to

withdraw all my complaints lodged as non official member because I have no

time, money and energy to assist prosecution, as my performance needs

recognition, respect and appreciation instead of insult and non cooperation

from the public servant, who are duty bound and paid for their performance.

1. As per verbal orders of then Chairman of the Committee, my agenda

items, which were defer for next meeting, may kindly be considered.

2. Kindly refer to the orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of

India in CWP No. 309 of 2003, duties and functions were defined of this

committee but I am sorry to say that field functionaries of the Urban

and Local Bodies along with Panchyati Raj Institutions, totally failed to

perform accordingly to the duties and functions decided of the District

Committees for Slaughter Houses because unlawful slaughter houses

cum meat shops are openly functioning, concerned officials of the both

Urban and Local Bodies with Panchyati Raj are not initiating to crack

down, Ambala Municipal Corporation, even allowed unlawful

slaughtering in their own shops, unregistered and unlicensed meat


2/41

shops are working all around in Haryana, whereas some meat shops are

regularized by the Administration but animal and birds are being

unlawfully slaughtered, violating the Slaughter House Rules, 2001.

3. As per orders passed by the Authorities of the Urban and Local Bodies,

field functionaries of this Department failed to obey the Administrativeorders, hence compliance of these orders may kindly be considered,

while recording Annual Confidential Reports of the Commissioners /

Joint Commissioners / Executive Officers / Secretaries / Chief Sanitary

Inspectors / Sanitary Inspectors etc.

4. As per Notification, Panchyati Raj Institutions are also failed to

perform, unlawful slaughter houses cum meat shops are openly

functional, no lists are being prepared for further cracking down, hence

DDPO / BDPO’s annual confidential reports also needs attention.5. The District wise census of animals and birds doesn’t allow for the

establishment of meat export units, within the jurisdiction of Haryana,

even in Mewat District two major slaughter houses are functional and

third was ready to function, whereas this Tapkan proposal was never

approved by the State Committee for Slaughter Houses, the operator

already have Slaughter House at Unnav in UP then why he is coming to

Haryana, which is not feasible as per census of animals and birds all

around, so all unlawful permissions and no objections needs to be

withdrawn. It would also be pertinent to mention here that grant in aid

from the Govt. of India attract new proposals of the meat export units,

which needs to be declined.

6. Field functionaries may kindly be directed to survey the area about

demands of meat supply, keeping in view the consumption and then

prepare a project reports for modification and establishments of new

slaughter houses, only for local consumption, to meet out the demands

not for meat export.

7. Animals are being badly abused, while shifting in non ISI goods

transport vehicles, whereas Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,

notified the Central Motor Vehicle (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2015

and animals / birds can be shifted as per their shape and size, whereas

section 94 of the Haryana Motor Vehicle Rules also defined the process

of animal shifting, Cattle Transport Rules, 1978 amended in 2001 also


3/41

defined the mechanism but without pre transport permit, which

required under section 96, animals are being abused, hence

responsibilities may kindly be fixed on the Deputy Director cum

Secretary, SPCA’s for any violation. It would also be pertinent to

mention here that Hon’ble Supreme Court of India also uphold animalrights and clarified the transportation system of animals:

Extracts of some Paras of Supreme Court order dated 7.5.2014 in SLP

(C) No.11686 of 2007:

Para “77. We, therefore, hold that AWBI is r ight in its stand that

Jal li kattu, Bull ock-cart Race and such events per se violate Sections 3,

11(1)(a) and 11(1)(m)(i i) of PCA Act and hence we uphold the notif ication

dated 11.7.2011 issued by the Central Government, consequently, Bulls

cannot be used as per forming animals, either for the Jall ikattu events or

Bull ock-cart Races in the State of Tamil Nadu, M aharashtra or elsewhere

in the country. We, therefore, make the following declarations and

directions:

(1) We declare that the rights guaranteed to the Bulls under Sections 3

and 11 of PCA Act read with Ar ticles 51A(g) & (h) are cannot be takenaway or cur tail ed, except under Sections 11(3) and 28 of PCA Act.

(2) We declare that the f ive freedoms, referred to earli er be read into

Sections 3 and 11 of PCA Act, be protected and safeguarded by the States,

Centr al Government, Union Terr itories (in short “Governments”), MoEF

and AWBI .

(3) AWBI and Governments are directed to take appropr iate steps to see

that the persons-in-charge or care of animals, take reasonable measures to

ensure the well -being of animals.

(4) AWBI and Governments are dir ected to take steps to prevent the

in f li ction of unnecessary pain or suf fering on the animals, since their

r ights have been statutor i ly protected under Sections 3 and 11 of PCA Act.

(5) AWBI is also directed to ensure that the provisions of Section

11(1)(m)(i i) scrupulously followed, meaning thereby, that the person-i n-


4/41

charge or care of the animal shall not inci te any animal to fight against a

human being or another animal.

(6) AWBI and the Governments would also see that even in cases where

Section 11(3) is involved, the animals be not put to unnecessary pain and

suffer ing and adequate and scienti f ic methods be adopted to achieve the

same.

(7) AWBI and the Governments should take steps to impart education in

relation to human treatment of animals in accordance with Section 9(k)

inculcating the spiri t of Ar ticles 51A(g) & (h) of the Constitution.

(8) Parl iament is expected to make proper amendment of the PCA Act to

provide an effective deterrent to achieve the object and purpose of the Act

and for violation of Section 11, adequate penalties and punishments

should be imposed.(9) Parli ament, i t is expected, would elevate r ights of animals to that of

constitutional r ights, as done by many of the countr ies around the world,

so as to protect their digni ty and honour .

(10) The Governments would see that if the provisions of the PCA Act and

the declarations and the dir ections issued by this Cour t are not proper ly

and effectively compl ied with , discipl inary action be taken against the

erring officials so that the purpose and object of PCA Act could be

achieved.

(11) TNRJ Act is found repugnant to PCA Act, which is a welfare

legislation, hence held constitu tional ly void, being violative of Ar ticle

254(1) of the Constitution of I ndia.

(12) AWBI is directed to take effective and speedy steps to implement the

provisions of PCA Act in consul tation wi th SPCA and make periodical

reports to the Governments and if any violation is noticed, the

Governments should take steps to remedy the same, including appropr iate

foll ow-up action.”

8. Infirmaries are also not functioning, which are necessary, as per section

35 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 / animal species

wise feeding charges are also not fixed by the Animal Husbandry

Department.

9. Animal Welfare Board of Haryana along with Gau Seva Ayog have

been notified, with the similar animal welfare motive, hence mechanism


5/41

may kindly be developed for fruitful coordination towards prevention of

cruelty to animals. It would also be pertinent to mention here that

AWBI appreciated the decision of this Committee, widely circulated all

over India and then Central Motor Vehicle Rules was amended, many

times declaration of cow progeny as state animal of Haryana, wasdiscussed and recommended by this committee, hence again I am

placing this agenda to declare COW as state animals of Haryana

without disturbing the status of black buck as it was done in Rajasthan

because Camel and Chinkara, both are state animals of Rajasthan,

similar practice can be adopted here in Haryana, when OX became

state animal of Bihar then why not COW in Haryana?, where Gauvansh

Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015 enforced and under section

19 of this Act, Govt. of Haryana can make the rules, adopting COW asstate animal of Haryana.

10. Poultry birds may kindly be included in the state bye laws of the meat

shops and following legislation’s may kindly be implemented as per

letter and spirit:

# Food Safety and Standards Authority of India guidelines, rules and

regulations.

# Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

# Haryana Panchyati Raj Act, 1994.

# Slaughter House Rules, 2001

# Cattle Transport Rules 1978 amended 2001 read with the Central

Motor Vehicle (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2015.

Section 94 of the Haryana Motor Vehicle Rules.

# Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 .

# Haryana Municipal (Regulation of sale of meat) Bye laws, 1976 (Policy

on Meat Shops defective).

# Haryana Municipal (Regulation of slaughter Houses) Bye laws, 1977.

# Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015.

11. Child labour also found at slaughter houses cum meat shops but as per

Slaughter Houses Rules, 2001, age of child defined as 18 years, whereas

per law concerned, age defined as 14 years, hence Slaughter Houses

Rules, 2001 needs to be amended, as per Child Labour Act, so Hon’ble


6/41

Supreme Court of India may kindly be intimated through Member

Convener.

12. Training Course on Good Governance to be held from 25.04.2016 to

29.04.2016 at ISTM, New Delhi, hence similar state level training

workshop may kindly be arranged, module attached for approval.13. The Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Rules, 1972 re notified under

Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015, under which

beef and beef products are accepted as diet on medical advice, FSSAI

asked me to approach ICAR for confirmation of medicinal values but as

per law existed Cow progeny can’t be slaughtered then there are no

question of beef / beef products consumption, hence Committee may

kindly consider my concern about and recommend the suspension of

this Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Rules, 1972. I have moved CWP No.200 of 2016, which was dismissed by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana

High Court; hence I prepared Appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of India.

14. Experimentation on animals also prohibited in India, even import of

cosmetics tested on animals are also banned then how we can offer cow

progeny for any experimentation under law?

15. Camels are being transported towards UP from Rajasthan via Haryana

for slaughtering purpose, whereas FSSAI disapproved camel meat for

human consumption but there are no legislation’s for camel

transportation, hence Committee may recommend introduction of

camel transportation rules and regulation, directing all District

Committee Chairman’s cum Deputy Commissioners to issue preventive

orders on camel transportation in goods transport vehicles.

16. All Regional Transport Authorities, may kindly be directed to get

affidavit from the owners of the vehicles, while passing that they will not

carry animals, if carried then registration needs to be cancelled, keeping

in view the Central Motor Vehicle (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2015

read with Cattle Transport Rules, 1978 amended in 2001 and section 94

of the Haryana Motor Vehicle Rules.

17. Satakpuri based Slaughter House, complaints were investigated by the

SDO (AH) but Central Motor Vehicle (Eleventh Amendment) Rules,

2015 read with Cattle Transport Rules, 1978 amended in 2001 and


7/41

section 94 of the Haryana Motor Vehicle Rules were ignored /

overlooked and no CCTV coverage was checked by the investigating

team, likewise CCTV footage never monitored by the concerned SHO’s

/ Secretaries of SPCA’s, hence DDAH may kindly be directed, to ensure

each and every consignment of animals, entered in the Satakpurislaughter house and after confirmation of the pre transport permit

along with monitoring after CCTV footage at the front entry gate and

examining the health of animals then issue health certificate otherwise

concerned officials be hold responsible for any lapses, similar practices

are to be applied in the slaughter house of the Gitwako Farms India Pvt.

Ltd in Mewat along with rest of Slaughter Houses approved by the

APEDA and Pollution Control Board including Panchkula, Gurgaon

and Sonipat District based poultry birds slaughter houses.18. All unlawful slaughter houses cum meat shops, where animals and

birds are being slaughtered be shut down / crack down at once, whereas

licensed meat shops also be directed, not to slaughter animal and birds

at their shop. It would also be pertinent to mention here that Hissar

slaughter house get all permission then why it was not yet functional,

like wise Rewari slaughter house needs to be shifted from present place

because this slaughter house along with Faridabad and Yamunanagar

slaughter houses are functioning illegally, violating Slaughter House

Rules, 2001. It has been observed that Rohtak, Sonipat, Palwal, Sirsa,

Gurgaon, Mewat, Ambala and Karnal Police failed to lodge FIR against

unlawful slaughter houses, even complaints were given to them, hence

NOTICE through Advertisement in leading News papers may kindly be

given for awareness.

It is further submitted that I have faced defamatory and non cooperative

behavior from then Commissioner at Ambala Sh. Shakti Singh, during

conducting training, as approved by this Committee, hence Sh. Shakti Singh,HCS may kindly be asked for non compliance of observations and

recommendations submitted before him, neither tenancy of unlawful

slaughter houses cum meat shops canceled, offenders were not booked,

unlawful encroachments were not removed even front gate of the Ambala City

office, similar behavior was faced while meeting with then Commissioner,


8/41

Gurgaon Municipal Corporation, concerned Govt. official Sh. Vikas Gupta,

IAS, now working as Director, Urban and Local Bodies, Haryana, hence he

may be directed to change his mindset, while dealing with non official

members.

If Committee feels and appreciate my tireless services for cause without any

extra financial gain and benefit then I can move further otherwise I may

kindly be allowed to move resignation from this committee because I am not

satisfied with the functioning of field functionaries, if Committee needs my

services then I can give full time as Consultant to stream line the process all

over Haryana, without any financial gain and profit, as missionaries for

animal rights and their welfare.

At last I beg unconditional apology from all members of this house, if any myaction, dedicated efforts towards cause of animal rights and their welfare,

hurt their feelings, while performing my duties and functions, as defined

under article 51 A (g) of Indian Constitution.

With best wishes and regards,

Naresh Kadyan.

Cc for information and necessary action to:

1. Hon’ble Prime Minister of India.

2. Hon’ble Minister for Urban Development (Govt. of India).

3. Honble Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development cum Nodal

Officer, appointed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

4. Hon’ble Registrar, Supreme Court of India.

5. Hon’ble Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana.


9/41

Status as on 18 Mar 2016

Registration

Number: DOURD/E/2016/00352

Name Of

Complainant: Naresh Kadyan

Date of

Receipt: 19 Feb 2016

Received by : Ministry of Urban Development

Forwarded to : Ministry of Urban Development

Officer name : Shri B. Anand

Officer

Designation: Joint Secretary

Contact

Address: M/o UD, Room No. 308, C Wing,

Nirman Bhavan, Maulana Azad Road,New Delhi110011

Contact

Number: 23061295

e-mail : [email protected]

Grievance

Description:

Naresh Kadyan, non official Member, State Committee for Slaughter

Houses, Department of Urban and Local Bodies (Govt. of Haryana)

agenda items for the meeting, to be held on 19-2-16: Resignation under

protest. I tried my best to perform, besides the non cooperation of the field

functionaries, like Sh. Vikas Gupta, IAS and Sh. Shakti Singh, HCS,

because these Govt. officials, doesn’t want to perform and failed to work,

as per orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, keeping in

view the Swach Haryana, matter was taken up with the DoPT twice along

with the Ministry of Urban Development, hence I offer my resignation

from the State Committee for Slaughter Houses, Department of Urban

and Local Bodies (Govt. of Haryana) under protest and I will submit my

observations before the court of law. Please find attached here with my

agenda items for the State Committee for Slaughter Houses, Haryana for

consideration.

Current

Status: Closed (NO ACTION REQUIRED)

Reason : OthersDate of Action : 19 Feb 2016

Details :

The matter comes under the purview of the concerned State

Govt./Municipal Body to take necessary action in this regard. You may

like to approach them directly.


10/41

HARSAMADHANYour Grievance Status

Registration No. : FCURB/E/2016/00012

Name of Complainant : Naresh Kadyan

Received By : Administrative Secretary Urban local bodies

Received On : 19-02-2016

Case Presently with : Administrative Secretary Urban local bodies

Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

Your Grievance will be redressed within 30 days from date of Receipt (19-02-2016)

Case Presently Handled By: Officer Name : Administrative Secretary

Designation : Administrative Secretary

Address : Main Sectt. Chandigarh

Phone No. :

E-Mail Address :

Action History Table

Action Date Description Sent By Case Presently

Dealt By

Action TakenReport

Attachment

19-02-2016

RECEIVED

THE

GRIEVANCE

Citizen

Administrative

Secretary Urban

local bodies


11/41

Proposed agenda for the 6th meeting of State Committee for the slaughter houses, to be held on 19-

2-2016.

***

1. Review on the decisions taken in the proceedings of the 6 th meeting of the

Committee.

2. To discuss the term for non-official members of State Slaughter Houses Committee.

3. Action to be taken on the complaint of Sh. Vikas Gupta, IAS the then Commissioner

of Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon (copy of complaint enclosed).

4. To review the steps being taken up by the District Committee for implementation of

provisions of relevant act and rules made & issued by the Ministry of Environment

and Forest.

5. To review the matter with the convener to whom reports are being submitted by the

various Municipalities from time to time.

6.

To review the functioning of Distt. Level slaughter house committees.7. Any other matter with the permission of the chair.

Please include my agenda items, as additional points.

1. Consideration of the matter related to amendment in Motor Vehicle Act, draft

attached here with for taken in the 5th meeting.

2. Amendment in the Prohibition of Cow Slaughtering Act.

3. Introduction of the Haryana Animal Welfare Rules.

4. Illegal animal smuggling for Gadhimai animal culling, 2014 in Nepal.

Petition: https://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-

legislation-s

All crime against cow progeny should be cognizable and non bailable in legal terms.

1. Special fast track courts be introduce to try and decide, the crime against cow

progeny, under time frame policy.

2. No appeal, should lie against convictions.

3. Cow progeny be prohibit to use as performing animals.

4. Cow progeny can not be treated as goods, they can't travel by weight, because they

can shift as per their shape and size.

5. Vehicle be confiscated as Govt. property, if involved in crime against cow progeny

and registration be cancelled at once, no superdari be allowed.

6. Vehicle owner also be booked and arrested, in crime

7. IS:14904:2007 and IS:5238:2001 with IS:5236:1982 specifications and prototype for

animal transportation already existed and ineffective in India because, neither

vehicle manufacturing companies providing said ISI specified vehicles in open

market nor passed by the Competent Authorities and animals are being shifted in

https://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-shttps://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-shttps://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-shttps://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-shttps://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-shttps://www.change.org/p/he-governor-of-haryana-ban-cow-slaughter-amend-toothless-legislation-s


12/41

goods transport vehicles, with out ISI specifications, hence non ISI vehicles be

prohibited to carry animals.

8. Proof of burden on the accused instead of prosecution and pre transport permit be

mandatory, as required under section 96 of the Cattle Transport Rules, 1978

amended in 2001.

9. Cow progeny export from Haryana be prohibited.

10. Section 3 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 be strictly followed by

the custodian of cow progeny, if failed then this offense be cognizable and non

bailable with strong punishments in legal terms.

11. Cow progeny be declared as State animals of Haryana, in domestic animal category,

where as Govt. of Bihar adopted ox as state animal.

12. Pension for old, unproductive and disabled cow progeny be introduced.

13. Feeding, treatment, care and shelter charges be framed, as required under section

35 of the Prevention of Cruelty to animals Act, 1960.

14.

Male calves of cow progeny needs protection and their services can be utilized foragriculture, manufacturing of panchgavya, vermi compost, bio-gas etc.

15. All offenses against the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 be cognizable,

non bailable with strong punishments, in legal terms, it is further requested to

introduce Haryana State Animal Welfare Act, 2014.

16. The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Establishment and Regulation of Societies

for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) Rules, 2001 be implemented, State and

District level units be notified.

17. Infirmaries be functional, to keep cow progeny during court trails, which are

required under section 35 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

18. All offenses against the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport of Animals onFoot) Rules, 2001 be cognizable, non bailable in legal terms along with strong

punishments.

19. The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Registration of Cattle Premises) Rules, 1978,

The Transport of Animals Rules, 1978, The Prevention of Cruelty to Draught and

Pack Animals Rules, 1965, amended 1968 and The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

(Licensing of Farriers) Rules, 1965 also needs amendment.

20. Animal rights and their welfare subject be introduced in all Educational

Institutions, slaughtered animal skin and leather be prohibited.

21. Animal abuser be directed not to possess the custody of animals during court trials,

if convicted then permanently debar the possession of animals till the convicted

person last breath.

22. Bans the import of the machines that are used for the slaughtering of animals /

cows? In fact the BJP government has increased the subsidy on the import of these

equipments from 6% to 10%.

23. Implement the National Cattle Commission Report, 2002.


13/41

24. Implement the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha Committee on Petitions about

ban on meat export from India.

Petition: https://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-

cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadian

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways introduce draft rules for livestock

transportation for public comments, OIPA - Indian People for Animals along with

Animal Welfare Party suggestions:

1. All crime against animals should be cognizable and non bailable in legal terms.

2. Special fast track courts be introduce to try and decide, the crime against animals,

under time frame policy.

3. No appeal, should lie against convictions.

4. Camel and Elephant transportation also covered under these draft rules. 5. Animal can not be treated as goods, they can't travel by weight, because they can

shift as per their shape and size.

6. Vehicle be confiscated for second offense against animals and registration be

cancelled.

7. Vehicle owner also be booked and arrested, in crime against animals.

8. Present draft rule is an eye wash, nothing new in it because IS:14904:2007 and

IS:5238:2001 with IS:5236:1982 already existed and ineffective in India because,

neither vehicle manufacturing companies providing said ISI specified vehicles in

open market nor passed by the Competent Authorities and animals are being

shifted in goods transport vehicles, without ISI specifications, hence non ISI vehicles

be prohibited to carry animals.

9. Proof of burden on the accused instead of prosecution and pre transport permit be

mandatory, as required under section 96 of the Cattle Transport Rules, 1978

amended in 2001.

To, March 17, 2016.

SPIO to office of the Chief Minister, Haryana,

Chandigarh.

Subject: Information under RTI Act, 2005: White paper on Naresh Kadyan.

Greetings,

Please supply me the following information’s along with concerned noting parts:

https://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadianhttps://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadianhttps://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadianhttps://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadianhttps://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadianhttps://www.change.org/p/ministry-of-environment-and-forest-crime-against-animals-be-cognizable-and-non-bailable-abhishek-kadian


14/41

1. Complete details about nomination of Naresh Kadyan as non official Member of the

State Committee for Slaughter Houses, Department of Urban and Local Bodies

(Govt. of Haryana), including the circumstances, recommendations and copies of

concerned orders with concerned noting parts.

2. Details about facilities / status / financial benefits given to Naresh Kadyan, as non

official Member of State Committee for Slaughter Houses.

3. Detailed report about functioning and performance of Naresh Kadyan as non

official Member of State Committee for Slaughter Houses.

4. Complete list of unlawful slaughter houses and meat shops working in Urban and

Rural parts of Haryana, action taken report about the concerned officials, to comply

with the orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in CWP No. 309 of

2003.

5. Copies of affidavits filed by the Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, in response to

the Secretary to Ministry of Urban Development (Govt. of India) as Nodal Officer,

nominated by the court of law.6. Copies of permission granted and license issued to slaughter cow progeny, to eat

their beef as diet and carry beef products, as per legal provisions of the Prevention

of Cow Slaughter Rules, 1972, since beginning till date.

7. Copies of punishments for the violation of section 19 of the Gauvansh Sanrakshan

and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015 along with the punishments for the violation of rules

made out under section 19 of the said Act.

8. Details about mechanism, to identify the cow progeny leather, meat, tallow bones

for identification naturally dead cow progeny or slaughtered.

9. Complete list of cases registered against animal abuse in Haryana along with

present status of these cases.10. Copies of prototype developed to carry animals, as per ISI specifications read with

the Central Motor Vehicle (Eleventh Amendment) Rules, 2015 and orders passed to

prevent animal abuse in Haryana.

11. Complete list of census of animals, offered for slaughtering, permission granted for

slaughter houses along with their applications along with concerned noting parts.

12. Complete details along with reports of meat consumption demand in Urban and

Rural parts of Haryana.

13. Complete list and details about animal slaughtered, meat exported and revenue

generated in Haryana along with the incentives and facilities given to these

slaughter houses.

14. Complete details of action taken reports against the non performing officials, failed

to perform their official duties as defined under Haryana Municipal Corporation

Act, 1994, Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Haryana Motor Vehicle

Rules, in case of animal related issues.


15/41

15. Complete details of functioning Infirmaries and Society for Prevention of Cruelty to

Animals, please supply me the copies of orders passed by the court of law, keeping

in view said Infirmaries were established on papers but not functional, likewise

SPCA’s.

16. Please supply me the copies of research and recommendations, confirming that beef

have medicinal values and consume as diet along with the copies of descriptions

advised by registered medical practitioners about consuming beef as diet on medical

grounds.

17. Complete details about declaration of cow as state animals of Haryana,

recommendations of the Government bodies like state committee for slaughter

houses, Animal Welfare Board and Gau Seva Ayog of Haryana.

18. Naresh Kadyan submitted his resignation under protest on 19-2-2016 from the non

official membership of the state committee for slaughter houses, submitting his

agenda items, please supply me copies of action taken reports of agendas placed by

Naresh Kadyan before state committee for slaughter houses.19. Please supply me the complete details and copies of complaint received against

Naresh Kadyan or lodged by Naresh Kadyan along with the copies of proposal of

Naresh Kadyan removal from the state committee for slaughter houses, decision

taken by the Government along with relevant noting parts and papers / reports

considered during consideration his removal, copies of any orders passed, press

release issued on the concerned issue about removal of Naresh Kadyan along with

the facts, proof and figures as claimed by Smt. Kavita Jain, Minister.

20. Certificate about the integrity and honesty of Naresh Kadyan along with the copies

of disposal of CM windows No. 57985, 85401, 85426 and 74782 of 2015 with the

documents supplied by Khadi Board, while processing complaints against NareshKadyan.

Sincerely yours, Required fee IPO worth Rs. 50/- attached.

Naresh Kadyan,

C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi – 110085.

Mobile: 9813010595.


16/41

Chandigarh March 16 – Haryana Government has removed Naresh Kadian, a non-official

member of State Committee for Slaughter Houses.

While stating this here today Haryana Urban Local Bodies Minister, Mrs. Kavita

Jain said that the Chief Minister Mr. Manohar Lal has approved his removal from the

committee, adding that Naresh Kadian was an employee of Haryana Khadi and VillageIndustries Board from April 15, 1984 to August 7, 2014 but he never brought this fact to

the notice of the government. Also, he did not seek any approval from his office for

nomination as non-official member of the committee.

She said that Khadi and Village Industries Board revealed that his service record was

very poor and he was charge sheeted eight times, suspended three times and twice

remained on willful absence. An FIR was also registered against him by the State Vigilance

Bureau, Gurgaon which is still pending. He misbehaved with the Commissioner, Municipal

Corporation, Gurgaon who also requested government to initiate proceedings against him,

she added.

No. IPRDH/2016

Seema Arora

डंीगढ , 16 माच- हरयाणा सका ने नशे कािदयान को टटे लॉट हाउस कमटे के गै

सका िसय के िप स ेहटा िदया है।

हरयाणा शह थानीय नकाय मंी ीमती कता जनै न े आज यहा ंयह जानका िते ेह ुए

बताया क म ुयमंी ी मनोह लाल ने कमटे से उसे हटाने क ीक ृ त िान क ि है।

उहन ेबताया क नशे कािदयान 15 अलै , 1984 स े7 अगत , 2014 के िौान हरयाणा

िखा एं ामोयोग बोडच का कमचा हा , पत ु उहने इस तय को कभी भी सका के

यान म नह ंलाया। इसके अलाा उसन ेसमत के गै सका िसय के प म मनोनीत

होन ेके लए अपन ेकायाचलय स ेभी कोई ीक ृ त नह ंल।

उहन ेकहा क िखा ए ंामोयोग बोडच न ेबताया क उनका सेा रकॉडच भी न त का

है। उह आठ बा ाजचशीट औ तीन बा नलंबत कया गया तथा ह िो बा ेछा स े

अन पुथत भी हा। ाय ौकसी य ूो ग डुग़ां ाा उनके ध ाथमक भी िजच क गई

है, जो अभी तक लंबत है। उहने नग नगम ग डुग़ां के आय ुत के साथ ि वुयहा भी कया था , जसके लए उनके ध कायचाह कन ेहेत ु सका स े अन ुोध कया गया था।

माकं - 2016

ान /सीमा Spoken with Minister concerned today on March 17 2016 but she refused to

confirm said statements on her behalf issued by the DPR Haryana.


17/41

Please find orders passed by the Supreme Court of India in CWP No. 88 of

2016: (10). The Governments would see that if the provisions of the PCA Act

and the declarations and the directions issued by this Court are not properly

and effectively complied with, disciplinary action be taken against the

erring officials so that the purpose and object of PCA Act could be achieved.

Shri Vikas Gupta, IAS had been Commissioner, Gurgaon Municipal Corporation

but he failed to perform his official duties as defined under Haryana

Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, neither he prepared the complete list of

unlawful slaughter houses and meat shops, besides it he called tenders for

establishment of new slaughter houses without approval of State Committee for

Slaughter Houses, when I approached him not to do so and place the matter

before District Committee then he misbehaved with me, likewise his proposal

was to import equipment s for slaughter house, ignoring make in India vision

of Prime Minister of India, we have strongly protested Vikas Gupta wrong,

biased and unlawful acts, keeping in view the demand of meat consumption

along with the census of animals to be offered for slaughter, at last

proposal was turn down due to non feasibility of proposal, hence Vikas Gupta

misused the public money without applying his mind, besides it he failed to

issue license to meat traders as per legal provisions, I have lodged many

FIR s intimating the involvement of all Local Bodies officials including

Vikas Gupta, now he is posted as Director, Urban and Local Bodies, Haryana

but he never obeyed the directions issued in CWP No. 309 of 2003 read with

attached orders. Now he may be submitting his self appraisal for the year

2015-16, hence adverse remarks may kindly be recorded in his ACR and

vigilance inquiry may kindly be ordered for Vikas Gupta tenure as

Commissioner, Gurgaon Municipal Corporation, besides it his biased and

unlawful action also needs to be investigated, why he mishandled my

resignation dated 19-2-2016 from the Membership of State Committee for

Slaughter Houses, Haryana and prepared false and baseless proposal for my

removal before the Chief Minister, concealing actual facts and figure,

defamatory press release was also issued on March 16, 2016 by the DPR and

Vikas Gupta is responsible along with Khadi Board Raj Krishan Sharma, both

lodge false and bogus complaint against me for no reasons.

Action Status Details

Registration No: DPG/U/2016/80074

Name of Complainant: Naresh Kadyan

Date Of Reciept: 17-Mar-201

Recieved By: DPG


18/41


19/41


20/41


21/41


22/41


23/41


24/41


25/41


26/41


27/41


28/41


29/41


30/41


31/41


32/41


33/41


34/41


35/41


36/41


37/41


38/41


39/41


40/41


41/41

petition against vikas gupta, ias, for defamatory activities

Documents