pet/ct vs tee: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (ie) single-centre, prospective study...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE)
• Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age:
65 yr) with suspected prosthetic or intracardiac-device-associated IE,
undergoing PET/CT + transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
• Concordant findings between PET/CT and TEE: N=25 episodes:
IE present (+): N=15; IE absent (-): N=10
• Definite IE with PET/CT + and TEE – (N=14; 31%)
– N=1: pulmonary septic embolism detected on PET/CT
→ definite diagnosis of IE, despite TEE - and PET/CT -
Fernández-Hidalgo N. ECCMID 2014 abs. eP127
1 of 2
Data from poster
![Page 2: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE)
• PET/CT - with equivocal findings on TEE: N=4
– No signs of infection after removing antimicrobials
• Other advantages of PET/CT:
– Identification of site of infection in pts with prosthetic valves + devices
→ avoid unnecessary removal of uninfected valves
– Alternative diagnosis: N=2 (pneumonia, spondylodiscitis)
– Diagnosis of tumours: N=5 (colon: N=3; lung: N=2) (4 of them in early,
potentially curable stage)
PET/CT might be useful for early diagnosis of IE of cardiac prostheses, for precise identification of the location of infection if >1 device is in
place and for early diagnosis of tumours in elderly pts
Fernández-Hidalgo N. ECCMID 2014 abs. eP127
2 of 2
Data from poster
![Page 3: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Antistaphylococcal β-lactams vs vancomycin for IE due to methicillin-susceptible CoNS: mortality risk
• Multi-centre, observational cohort study:
– International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE) Prospective Cohort Study database: N=5,568 pts with infective endocarditis (IE) (2000-2006)
– ICE-Plus database: N=2,019 patients with IE (2008-2010)
• N=280 adult pts with monomicrobial IE caused by methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (Non-lugdunensis CoNS: methicillin MIC ≤0.25 µg/ml; S.lugdunensis: MIC ≤2 µg/ml):
– Antistaphylococcal β-lactams: N=88: Penicillinase-resistant penicillin: N=81 / Cefazolin: N=7
– Vancomycin: N=36 (4 pts with S. lugdunensis)
• Baseline parameters: no sign. ≠ between β-lactam and vancomycin group for age, gender, prosthetic valve IE, left-sided IE, diabetes mellitus, previous IE episodes, embolisation other than stroke, new or worsening heart failure, paravalvular abscess/fistula, valvular perforation, persistent bacteraemia, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
•
Carugati M. ECCMID 2014 abs. O252
1 of 2
Data from oral presentation
![Page 4: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Cox regression analysis: Use of β-lactams is NOT a significant predictor of survival time after discharge: HR=1.74; P=0.22
Antistaphylococcal β-lactams vs vancomycin for IE due to methicillin-susceptible CoNS: mortality risk
No sign. differences in mortality were found between antistaphylococcal β-lactam and vancomycin for methicillin-susceptible CoNS IE
Carugati M. ECCMID 2014 abs. O252
2 of 2
Data from oral presentation
![Page 5: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) for enterococcal infective endocarditis (IE): impact of length of Tx on efficacy
• Single-centre, retrospective analysis (Spain; 1997-2013): N=78 pts with enterococcal IE treated with AC or ampicillin + gentamicin (AG):
– For 4 weeks: native, non-complicated IE
– For 6 weeks: prosthetic or complicated IE or symptoms since >3 mo
Pericas JM. ECCMID 2014 abs. eP123
1 of 2
Data from poster
![Page 6: PET/CT vs TEE: diagnostic value for infective endocarditis (IE) Single-centre, prospective study (2012-2014): N=45 adult pts (median age: 65 yr) with suspected](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082517/56649ec05503460f94bcabda/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) for enterococcal infective endocarditis (IE): impact of length of Tx on efficacy
• AEs due to antibiotic Tx: no sign. ≠ between AG and AC groups:– AG: skin rash (N=1), ototoxicity (N=2), vestibular toxicity (N=1)– AC: myelotoxicity (N=1), skin rash (N=2), C. difficile diarrhoea (N=2),
superinfections due to β-lactam resistant agents (N=2)
Pericas JM. ECCMID 2014 abs. eP123
2 of 2
Data from poster
As 4 weeks Tx with AC for enterococcal IE showed a trend towards higher incidence of relapses, AC should be prolonged for ≥6 weeks