PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONSProf. Elizabeth Aguiling-Pangalangan

First Semester, SY 2005-2006

Reference books: Tolentino, Vol. 1, Civil Code and Sempio-Div, The Family Code of the Philippines

COURSE OUTLINE AND SYLLABUS OF READINGS

introduction

A. Background on Phi losophy of the Civi l Code *Agabin, The Philosophy of the Civil Code, 66 PLJ 1 (1991)

B. Intersection of Modern Constitutional Developments and Traditional Family Law

1. Provisions of the 1987 Constitution Sec. 12 and 14, Art. 11

Sec. 1, Art. I HArt. X\'!

2. Overview of Due Process and Equai Protection Cases Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479

Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438

11. Civil Personality

A. Concept and Classes of PersonsArts. 37, 40-47Spc 12, Art 11, Constitutitun

Cases:Geluz v. CA, 2 SCRA 801 (1961) People v. Tirol, 102 SCRA 558 Joaquin v. Navarro, 93 Phil 257

A. Capacity to Act and Restrictions Thereon

Presumption of CapacityStandard Oil Co. v. Arenas, 19 Phil 363

2. RestrictionsArts. 6, 38-39, Civil Code

a. Minority RA 6809

i. Effect on ContractsArts. 1327, 1390 (1), 1403 (3), 1397, 1399, 1489, 1426-27, 1489, Civil Code

Cases:Mercado v. Expiritu, 37 PHil. 21 15Bambalan v. Maramba, 51 Phii. 4i 7Branganza v- Villa Abrille 105 Phil. 456Shields v. Gross, 58 NY 2d 338

J. Effe-,t on MarriageArt. 5 and 35, Family CodeMoe v. Dinkins, 533 F. SUPP. 623

iii. Effect on Crimes Arts. 12, 48 2, 68 RPC

79

b. Insanity

i . Ef fect on Contracts Arts. 1327, 1328, 1399, Civil Code

i. Effect on Crimes– Art. *112, R P_ Clases:Carilln v. Olaojaco, 46 Phil. 9511 U.S. v. Vaquilar, 27 Phil. 88Dumaguin v. Reynolds, 10 Phil. 306

ii. Effect on Marriage Art. 45 and 47, FC

C. State of being deaf-muteArts. 1327, 807, 820, Civil CodeCases:People v. Sasota, 52 Phil. 281Director of Lands v. Abelardo, 54 Phil. 381

C. ProdigalityArt 92 (2), Rules, of CourtCase:Martinez v. Martinez. 1 Phil. 182

C. Civil InterdictionArt. 34, RPCArts. 54 & 123, Civil Code Arts. 11.2, 13.5 RPC

D. Family RelationsArts. 37 & 87, Family Code Arts. 1109 & 1490, Civil Code

G. AlienageSec. 2, 7, 8, 11, Art. 12Sec. 4, Art. 14, Sec 11; Art 16 Constitution

H. AbsenceArts. 39U, 391 Civil Code Art. 124, FC

Married WomenArt. 2259, Civil CodeRule 3, Sec, 4. Rules of Court

Ill. Marriage

A. Definition and Nature of Marriage

Art. 1, Family CodeSec. 1-4, Art. XV, ConstitutionBreach of Promise to Marry - Arts. 19-21, 2176 Civil Code - Cases:,Nassmerv. Velez, 12 SCRA 648Tranianco v. CA, 18 SCRA 994

De Jesus v. Syquia., 58 Phil. 866 -

B. Marriage Models

1. Traditional Marriage

*Galbraith, "Economics and the Public Purpose" (1973) (photocopy)Case: Graham v. Graham, 33 F. Stipp 936 - -i k,,ui i - c-t-,t

1. Challenges to the Traditional Marriage Model

Chafe, "Looking Backward in Order to Lock Forward" (1976) (photocopy)

a. The Changing Status of Women Dunn v. Palermo, 522 S.W. 2d 679 -

b. By Private Contract: When Valid? When Void?In Re Santiago, 70 Phil 66 1 , , , ,A- A , I - jSelanova v. Mendoza, 64 SCRA 69 i

C. Requisites of Mar

, riage

Arts. 2-3, Family

, " i t , , ,

I. Essential Requisites

I. u, , j a 1 C, ;3 pi ~~ P 'j, ; I I I ~ ~ : ~,

,-i i 1 d I" I i I a 1 t_.:

UPI[ 21 Docember PGOO ;Air:, Kkio LoAd. 1 0 W(j,I

,_JJ ; ! C o d e ( ) ; i opc,.jiiw,,j up /1 PIL;,ii;qje)- 110uplIands

Ari3. 4, 45(3) F,,iiiiii.y, Gode Woe V, Swolqu 5; Phi l bu

A j[hori[y of ScLinnLing Officer

Ai A n 10. M, ?2 Family Code[Meet of absence of authority – Alt 4, 35(2) 10 i 3, Civil CodaCase:flahrm v. Dan QgWy 250 SCTA 12D ArqQ3 v. Occhmo, AT-0 11, 2002

A r i~ -3. 9-34 Fan ii1y Code; PD065( iWW 3 0 5 :

1y j L) I i c v Ij S C RA 2,15 7 More I I a V. A4we~~ 010 8 C R , A 120 People V. Dorromcu, 133 !SCR/\ 10G`Soguisabal v. 106 SCRA (31'

J i l l § I T w o)

–an

r w e W 4 , Aii~ 0"

(1:;. Gclensorly

Ads . 3 G, 3 , 21 , 2 9 , 2 2 . 1 1

Cases:12 1-11;1!. 7",3 I

1,1(11 idujic; V. L;e [ cu; i.k l e t ; j o v i . P r ( 6 6

Ali. 220 U Civil

i'l, tid"d V. CA, 2~qqd ,- , J a c o b V .

Ni;(rW,,tY;0Ijf L,,;C,(,jCC)

'I 1. . ,<.601,101,109

mopimo V-s.

I of t; ye I oi G 'i 11 t

A,

S C k/ i I t (IQ

" J id ` J - d I I ' ; 1

• Pei VS

" I A A : j

, 7ickluuyw f r a j

-Atenfk (-ere

, - Nt e 2.4A - ,, ~A ,· Terre VS I-cry, -1s (~14~A!UJW

u s e r ' ,

C i l i a V ~ IT

e44, Me-

o ilemg vs Coln

0 ) * ; p w 4 )tj 1 if , 'JOYA a L e d n e - f lC-4.

A414, -1401.1.!

f;La ftvVft, fir

35 3t . 4 , 15 - 4 1 , 44 C o d e . 8 5

Arts. 390-391, CC

V. I'vilul Idoza,Foiel 1 :1110 F)arnS, 122 SCrA 525

I v. Sct ii-)ic) -Dy, 14'1)) ~11 1- R/% ~~19 Tone, 11) ~~ 1 SCRA -1 -Q1 f '_ ~ V . - I

/I l k A V. 01-11iantos, :713

A c ! ~ A i1-loijaJ.]~m~--;c.) v . 'J'

v. Gantcro 203' 47 (1991)

G. Art. 36 . (Read annotations in Semplo-Diy, i lon(JI-cul- oil The Family Code of the Philippines)

Santos v. Bedla-Santos 2,10 SCRA 20Rep. v. Molina, 268 ) SCRA '198 (1997)

Domingo v. CA, 226 SCRA 672I o, 3 -v. C " I io a , 302 324 2002) v. CA, 230 "GRil, "24

Eflects of Nullity

Arts. 50-541

Case: Ninal v. Badayong, 028 SCRA 122 (21000) 7)!,D Marriages

Grounds for AnnulmentPuts. 45-13. Family (1060AIL 344, I\JJCCnsps:!'\' n t i i ) I j i I

a I -, v. T- I i o i -; o 'J 1-3 0 0 17p- - /L :L IC~ , ' I t V . BLJG(~Z~1 , S ' U r , , q Aquino V. Du I LO, 1091'111121/ \ 11 ,-~ y a V. owl, , 3n ~ C 1 ?is,kiAlZ v. Alieliza, 40 O.G. 19u3 -

wu:Icl- V. Ca;ii.-we';, 109 Phii. 2713Sai ao v. fUluavarn, 40 (J.G. 1'i 13; jpp. 2u3floop.e V. Santiago

" Uj0 ( 3 r , ~

2 ' jye W h e n a l e , ;3 Abc-,crit.

L;S V. Idol 64 Phil. il. 1.79

49,-"',) - 5,!, Family C (),Jc

1, Giv'ii CodeJ, Civil cc J c,

4. juri_3i.iichuii

,~/, L ~! ~ ;, I I

A. Grounds

Art. 56, Family CodeArt. 97, Civil CodeW e s :

People v. Zapata and Dundee, 336 Milk wjl(,i NO oz v. Barrios, CA 51 OG 5247 C U M = w Pwiaramh I N S O M 0 2 - ,

US v K I M = 4 NO 110 ; i• A ,,

Lapuz Sy v. SC!,A 117 D u l a Cruz, Dela Cruz, 22 ",CNA

( 4. I f

An. 56

PpqAe V . 3 u n s a n u , 59 ITH. 73Ouunii,,o v-. Rorenuiclv% 107 Phil 35 Snogent v. S a r y n k 114 A. 428

c l ~ r m l V. " ,,'wnhaj, 102 Phil. 108

M a n v. M a n 2 Al -1 E. I . 4f33 Gi;l0, ,--' V. i'AP~j&-yurig, '100 PM. (32'j Makak v. ; Yoxedes, 1 (Y-j ph ii . ',769

I 1 11 i ., ,

5,74A)W a s :

Oc~ •t,ipc) v. Florunciarw, , , u p i a

('01 V. N -1,1camU, 13 SGRA 222v. Vanwnl

-i, i(3 '6CR/'\ 'I

CHIOS:

U,,; ka 'Jima v. V ;! I Li rec 1, 11 1 F'u,» ! !. I i i - 's-Luciano,

plow& of Loan (Wiro:

V,

Ar i-amily C~)dc

(hitjwarico Co-1c)and I i i d, I i ik f /1, C I C 1

GOSO:La Oe v. La Rua, 304 VVE. 2d 31,-'

DEteri i iining the Best interest of the Cl JIJL Gender and Tender Years PreSUPiDUC;,-1

Cases:Ex We Devine, WO Go. 2d 686 - Cc.rvaiit:,s v. Fujir,,ido, 169 SCRA -WS ENdo" %o CA.Colis V. caiLi.ir,

F:]( -Iman v. Feldioarl, 358 NY3 2d 501 —Y E,arll.05 13 V. C,/"\, 53 GI /10/

A

d i, !, C,b. the Childs PlAuPWO CObC

C,,,,, 250Pere v.G UI (j :jj

311 A.

C. 1 , pUon :jji

d ;ip

ChildFununons in the k ) ;, r i rdWi ldHaVy (CX,pqpl lofoi~opy)

il"i L !Gi 'Clt 10 , 9'`

Parental Unfitris:,„; Cases:

(,m ct a 1 ; r-, r

,

U 357

Civil Cude, Ail. 2G ~=C

Farr L m I i v. I I)ilk'), I 'JJ SCIII/\ 1,30

OLIki V . 1, 406

I- lorr iite v. CA 3,i!) SCRA 59~ -Cla!,J! a.k.j ReJo v. (-c;o, 360

2. Muslim DivorcesCode of Muslim Personal Laws

Case: Yasin v. Sharia District Ct, 241 SCRA GOG

11. De I-a(;to Separation

Art. 10U, 127, 239, 242, 246, 241

4, I _

C a s e : P e r e z v . G C A I T ( ' 5 5 5 6 1IJ-- and Obligations Oumeon I-IL!Slj,')il(l and Wife

1. 0 L

Emersoii, Falk, Froodinan, Tli~~ Lqual f=ights

Arnuidiner.-L A Constitutional Basis for Equal Rights f)i 'V.Iumell, 80 Yale L.J. 872; 936-954 (1971)

hode, Justice and Gender, Ch. 1 Natural Rights arid Natural( 1 9 9 0 1 )

Col iAl)itaJUn, mutual love and ro,',.pect Art. 247, Revised Penal CodeN-L 68, Family Co(,Ie-. Art. 34, civil Code [-;A 3353 (Anti Rap,-, Law)I R A ( . Y , ' I 3 . ' C ' ( A i ; ; t i - V N , V C )

f\,J ~~ ra v. 1 11 j i Li g, 291 :;C[ V\ 451 -

G"J:ilizi V . calllp():3 Rucf4,1, 35 Phil. 2 ,52- 1, ,

Warren V. S L I tE,, 25 5 G a. i 5 1, 3 ( i E. 2 d 2 ;' 1Thl--1)],J1 V. City of I-o;rhjUtoii, 59,1') F- Suijp. Ib,"!

v . Li!Jorta, 64 Wi' :A)' 2d474 NlY 2d 5(;i'

Ij

cosvi:I-ei ,.I i~ivu,- v. 17 'jCi%A 6411

v Villanueva, 54 PI iL 92v. ';,3ntiLtqo, 53 Phil. 952

i\ t i!,a n o v. (.-, 1 i uU i E i ij, 3c i ij, '110 3 F'I i i 1. 255AM Rosario v. Dal Flusahu, 45 n?G 612W

I'Jutu.jI I i 21t) and Supporll,/,i Its. L TO, FC corn:)_-ired with Ail. 11, CC 199-

200, PC

t i i, e .,. Ll;; G U i I e, 157 Nob c, b 2_!,3, 1) 9 N.'vv. 2(133(3 ['day() v. Lauren, 12 [-IAN. 453

U. Management of the Household

Art. 71, FC compared with Art. 115, CC

E. Exercise of professionAlt. f3, 11—C compared with Art. 1 17, (,3CPA 7192 jVu"inn A Development and NaUmuMbIlAng an')

Case: V. Wino's, 93 wall) 13Í)

K Use of SurnameArt. 370, 373, 377, 378 Civil Code;

ases:'110 Phil 57

oilva v. PeioY,162 GCRA 66

YHs& v. Sharra Emstd.t supra

G. F~elicf. from Cuuil,; Art. 72

V11

Perez v. 1--lere.T, '109 Phil. 057 U Arroyo v. Vasquez, 42 Phil. 5,1

Pif-verty Relations Between Spouses

X Genes ! PmAhn-sArk, 14-81, Fan illy CodeGas(,,: Collector v. Fisher, il 0 Phil. ~XGq

f', f)(mritir)n-,

1. lzeq WROS lul donam):

3

i i-, i n o v. o lo n i,--) n, 105 Phil

Solk v. Ra r i -o s r), 57; Phil. c,N.1:11..-,c)

V., , C R A 3'3,1

ID (-) n ~ i t i c) n r rr r. r i i t 11) t-, c JF ; ;m ~ P. -,; o, f, , ~ i in

fill-! l-'r I nfr

VL0 I1)or,_1I:c)nC ,-I : ( ; 9 ..

-arew) v. Diron, 45 OG 1). 2iii't-i v. Cervantes,

_)biien_ rvantos, 38 SCRA 28W I. Wading v. Commercial Union, 381-hil. 164

Si I M j ) , j J I V . C A : 3 0 3 S ( C I R l " , - 0 1 5 •w, c ry n; A I.) s i c. o n-, rn u ri

MPrnvisinn- - Ark.

Is AI P

G, -,ujo,~ Upon the rl f , , ~ j 1 ;in( I Dispcsit;~oi of the fol

OwnershipPissoli it'O,! Arts. 9.f+-10i

L i r , ilid at!4.) P. A- 'i

On:-i:; v J-willo, 50 Phil. 73`1

W n . ric Dpi'.- v. Dchzo, 6~-~ C r! 1

D. - . o r d i i cr i l I l art i ler- l . i r o f Gains

I G,%-n, -ral - Arts. 105 rl y - .!'..r

7 V . D

o. V.

v. 1,i-li , - (, 1), 1 2 n i

'A

Oil V.

IZ,

1 2 4 - ,,(31 ?,/\ -:i 'I i I in I I I 1-'Va V. 'I A..;,

r All. I 1:~' FCc a s w

(,,'astillo V . 11 102I - (' rn n'-'O v.

(A ~ 1 ?, t 11 e n in rc, i -n t , i i:P0. .1"'0' !-(-,c:

v. Forlt!o, '12

c. Charge-3 upon the CPGArts. 121 A 2CCases:

me n- -,iL 3'Javier v . 0 . ;, 1~, 3,1 P; C,Perez v. Lx:tin, 2'.") F) R P %,,. hd i 1, 1G1 ", (-, 1 CLl3tiUj V. PvlorelnG, Lj eon Surety v.AWN Investment v. Ching 28R ECKA "0, Codos v . lWardo (No 19 , 2no j , 7 , -

i. A(!iriiiistr,-itionof the C,FIC, M 1 2 4 0 2 5

Cases-Felipe v. Heirs of Maximo Aldc ~n, 120 Tinitiq,n v. Tinifigati, 100 !7GR'% ;iI9 Chiang v

CA, 2!.1 ', C 372R d i m , v , Lopez (Januart %, 2002) la.(101-41-1! wlo V. Camnia (J I-ant-mi y 23,

r! » 1 - i i so lu l ion o f "heArt-,-. 1 -)6-120

Liquidation ofAsm-, A N A W W IC N ao !.:', 'rlk1- v- C',1-:1 (-,f

! :op-- imticn of Pm pHy and Niniddroku 4 W w a i 1 n T , y , f Q

c o n " U m m

of Icc rd, MY 134AWcosun:

v. k L i m - i i n o , ' 1 0 3 1 I n i l . 7 0 8

o v , I J) I` ,jG I , , L ".

In m T b m k i y -A Conju , r-ii bpr imus Nman, ld 13C,04 321'

A j-"A

;Arid lji,;,30111:r,il

A K Y Q W 4 2T SON N O woi o,, Oi: '-!";i P[

Ai!. J , ,

f;rt-3. 143-110

G. Pi opury Regimes uf Unkm Without Marriage Ads. 147-148

". 11 7

'I'll.

Cases:iLv v. orres,V. sc , 9 A 306

'Ida. de Uo I I " Ua ra V. C I L ' , 31 SOFA L a

,, -. , i n V. Uiiaui: io; 47 C)(.714216

\/'al(-I,.!s -v. [ JG 260 CCRA 221 ( I W;(!ao Caiiiio v. 1.(,c Caiho, 351

AMILY

i\viulohers t- I a 1-amilyi. Hatufo- /Ws. 149-151, GC1 S u pp u l - Arts. 195- 208, CN,iii. FuoHrals -."ois. 305-31(), GC

uc-vchpllwrilt Gofp. V. Criy

lhnu k m a V . CA, A l S C R A 1 5 6 ;z

V.

i u v. (-!,'A 2 1

,, , ; ( , , ru, v. :,209 , G RA 34

ran-illy I!onl-Art~7 i 52-1 J2

EskiloGv. 1, 1"NI. 9,,7i ; : F, r, -y y c j, 155 S C! --' , / +,

uomw:

1"i"' V2'," ryL7A. 2f]

I. I ij'l u 11.

T!"I G~wli'-!l=enlily Lay:

"Do flew Repioductive Techniciut.-3

Coe :-anJiy':'• Surrogate Modierhood: Tlw , Loral aiid

Fhonan Issues (1988).

Im;,ugrrid Legitimacy Ail. 166-171

Nlclo! V. 89 Phil 165jdo v. -'~,2 SCPA 31a-`ik.•li.;~idadjrj v. CA, 100 S(;1-U\Gliu.:i keno Gi ip v. TAG, leb 4,'clCaUz ,;;)at •Ui n v. '166 ,(-:RA 151 Republic j, LaWdur, 305 URP, 438 (1099)

v. -Hock), 19*1 76) !PeO[)I(', V. 1 Uh;Ppad, 235 WRA 463 (1914)

v. Ct', 229 3C7RA 463 Dj;! ,ain de Aparic:io v. i,50 sc PA

D. i)i,')c4 of1- low to prove h1i;Aio; i

/\i t. -1 7'2; !,Ldes 12Ç .)'13U,Ai Civil coclo

u a s wColi"-"Lamino

%. U-J,3, ',-(T,'ALim v. CA, 65 1fu1-1-;irs uf . I lairs

~GIP, A 250U v. CA, 'I V , ;;;C:1;,,:\ matoiugui V. CA, 20;j 'ic"'A 6T5

De 110 35()

J ., j j u t r o 1,

i J-'-~7)

Art. if-4

l~e:)uLlic; '/. 0

o As is t,-.

of H I i.--lt;01 I P l o o l ( , , f u n

NL 175

Louterio v. CA, 1 U17 RAUyguai igGo v. CA 116 t%34Rodriguez T CA, 2115 SCRA -150 (1!.)i.-15)Arueg(-) v. CA, 2.54 3CRA7 H ',

,I l'-O."'llJ i s v. CA, 230 S -CRil, /1`,..r;i'.dl'-,',c,m,,j -. 232 f-jG;%A 145

AT 176RA 9V55 n;'

David v. CA, 250 SCIO (1f ';J5)People v. Man ioyan, 246 100; U\ C !6 (19)5) mossk--.;g eld "/. 300 11...; (-,! ~/-\ 46,1 ( ! ~

") Rep v. Abeiddl,-j, 302 S,,,' [,A 3t)8

Gonzales v. CA, 2z,'S C (7 R .-J U 6)

Republic v. Ourn iui;-j 300 133 ( I Gan V. 17,OYL7:s (iv!ay ~-'8' 2t)(12))Tollou v. c"'. (Feb. 1, ',T(12)

D. Ckilcirc, IH7

cow,,,:D c L o s O M S I D O = 1 0 V I A W ' , ,

Ramkun v (.Awuq dT 110 ;',1,5,)1

nrid ,n 4)1,1-nettling Rtdos (117:R)ll-'Pxily Code imovisions

Jul):1 a 2 CH L J I I C IRID'.;O I Li h(A 1 Of tf;0' 5UpVUI.O I', 16 ol)

14

I M i o i i a . , L i d o o l k l e/\I. I-C

C'i3In I ~:: Adup liu i of [-(,'wii i Villa, 2 1 HNA '39

V. GA Eol)lles' 2UbRepublic V. Tolcdwlo & cll-)v(~' ')3 9F'le;.ubliu v. ivlillu,-, "')(.)G 133

ul Aduptiori Pi Tlil ius

Cases:v. Uawp-s, '-)2

V.

v . P l e l u n , " ll ' ) (3,15-

L3. Pm-Adcylion Lind AJojpL'i,)ii Pioce,,ii;iC) o!!Ij

C. Consent Necessaryfor Adoption Art. 138

Ca3es:Duncan v. CFI, 69 SCRA e'_OulG;,.mg v. Clavano, 206 SC-r-. ; 1218 ( i'jUL't'!

0. o.Arts. 189-190, t=ai Wily Codf), Ai t. ;;GO Civil Co

Cases:Tai i iargo v. CA, 200 SCIPA 513

SayGojj V. C,A' 205 CI~Crl/\

Johnston v. Hepub:k, I '-`IHA 1040 Republic v. Wong, 209 SCI'.A 1 -T; Republic v. CA & Carwito, '4.55

Republic v. Hert-lawleZ', 2J3 SCI';°~ t

L . R e 3 c i s s i o n

F)I %e"Jiliallion of Siloul'atai Ulil i.:

C. Inter Couliiry doption80, L) alld iL; !RI-11,

I j j u c . C u m u i i i i i , i i un !k),; I till reli Lm('

i l , , u l n

1 1 . A d o p t i o n I s - -Readings:

'Ziegler, ll lt- lioiial A,*Baithlulet, ,,,Iy Bo,,

f 'lie 1''te!est of [he ChildPolitics

i0l.01 (1)"

L, 1) I J 1 1: ', G1-- P A; ~ L N I

Provisions,Arts. 20c) ;'15, F(,RA ")W2 ll,,-ii(2iiL 'V*Vullaw Act)

Cases:

&jn~tos v CA 242 S(3P/\,jW (ILW15)

SubMaWq and Speck! Parvibal Authority

c d s mP~,h uc V. I,[ iNli Ites, 41 :?CPAAn iodgi a V. CA, I C") SCI )''15St. [,,Iary's Academy v. Cm-pitairos, Vanuil v. BeIrries,356 SCRA 707 (2001)

Effects of Parental AuthorityArts. 220-22GCases:

Cabanas v. Flilapil, 5,B SCRA. 94Lihi v. TAC, N4 SGRA 316Li!id'aiji v. C, ,N,, 2 ,12 725Moe v. Silvans, 309 SCRA 3G2 11 U95;

Suspension or Termination of Parental Aultlro;i(v Arts. 225-233, FCSec 5-10, 27-28, 31-c, IRA 7610 (Anti-Child Ak,!~e /V;[)

Cases:CI qua v. Cabangbang, 27 SCRA T91i Abiera v. Orin, 8 Phil. '1193Codes v. Castillo, 41 1"hit. 4G(3

E Surnamr; ProcedureAds. 249-252

136-1 (Fan uly Courts A(,,t,,.)f K)97)

MAIN of Pamnts-c a l m

Sii.,a v. CA Lind Gonzales, X15 L,'C[',A UO'd

;Uh: i mum Putres of ChildrenAi E 375-376, Civil Co(](--.

i,, ~ . 1 4( o X 2 1 1, par .1, 2 1 3 , 1 , -11 ~,il/

U

0 V. 14' 1' 'd uu1 r_ Edmucl C. Clara County0"10. e. v

Fdf!ion() I /B Cal. PpIr. Gr.W

I hu Did