personhood: in vitro fertilization (ivf)

Upload: walter-b-hoye-ii

Post on 06-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Personhood: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

    1/3

    Images not displaying properly? Click here to view the online version.

    A Weekly Column By Walter B. Hoye II

    Conflict Of

    Interest

    In the abortion debate, is there a "Conflict of Interest"within the Black community and among her leaders?

    Subscribe Unsubscribe Forward Archives Issue No.: 2011.318

    Personhood: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

    In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) is a process where oocyte

    cells are fertilized by sperm cells outside the body: In

    Vitro. The process involves hormonally controlling the

    ovulatory process, removing oocytes from the woman's

    ovaries and letting male sperm fertilize them in a fluid

    medium. The blastocyst, (three (3) to five (5) day old

    embryo), is then transferred to the uterus with the intent to establish a successful

    pregnancy.1

    The first successful birth of a "TestTube Baby", Louise Joy Brown,occurred Tuesday, July 25th, 1978, five (5) years, six (6) months, three (3) days

    after Roe v. Wade on Monday, January 22nd, 1973. Robert G. Edwards, the

    physiologist who developed the treatment, was awarded the Nobel Prize in

    Physiology or Medicine in 2010.

    Let's be clear: Personhood WillNOTBan or OutlawInVitroFertilization

    Personhood: Embryonic Human Beings

    Many have expressed fear about how Personhood will impact In Vitro

    Fertilization because the process often creates more embryonic human beings

    than are implanted in the mother's womb and the excess are usually discarded.

    Let's be clear: Personhood WillNOTBan or OutlawInVitroFertilization

    In fact many "left-over" embryos are "donated" for use in purely destructive

  • 8/3/2019 Personhood: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

    2/3

    research; even "abnormal disabled embryos" are "donated" for "studying

    diseases".

    In a Tuesday, September 7th, 2010 press release, the

    American College of Embryology (ACE) ardently

    opposed DH-08-001 (regulation pending in California) that

    proposes to define human embryos as diagnostic

    specimens. 2 ACE testified that "within diagnostic

    laboratories working with human specimens, there areclear pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases.

    At the end of the process the specimen is discarded as biological waste or stored,

    but in either case, the specimen is rendered non-viable. Diagnostic laboratory

    quality is measured in accuracy, sensitivity and specificity etc, according to the

    federal standards set by CLIA 88. On the other hand, human embryos do not

    become specimens at any stage of the process in the embryology laboratory. On

    the contrary, embryos are created with the intent to be transferred into the uterus to

    achieve pregnancy and all efforts are made to keep them viable. Embryology

    laboratory quality is measured in the percentage of embryos becoming live-born

    children." 3

    Let's be clear: Personhood WillNOTBan or OutlawInVitroFertilization

    Personhood will require ethical standards to forbid the intentional mass production,

    genetic selection and harvesting of embryos for research. WesleyJ.Smith, J.D.,

    Special Consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture Network (CBC) has this

    to say: "Let's hope the California bureaucrats pay heed to the embryologists.

    Whatever rules we create for nascent humans, should recognize that they are

    distinct human organisms. They are not blood cells or pieces of tumor tissue." 4

    Personhood: IVF Mothers Know The Truth

    "The morality of the 21st century will depend on how we respond to this simple but profound question: Does every human life have

    equal moral value simply and merely because it is human?" Wesley J. Smith, J.D.5

    IVFMothers know the yearning in their hearts to fill the

    void that can only be filled by a child. They go through

    tests, spend thousands of dollars to have the oocyte and

    sperm unite so one unique individual will begin to grow to

    the stage it can be instilled in her womb where it willimplant, continue growth and be born. The entire

    expectation of each infertile woman is that the single-cell human embryo, who was

    sexually or asexually reproduced In Vitro, allowed to grow bigger, and then

    implanted in her womb, will one day be held in her arms and in her heart. IVF

    Mothers believe that the tiny embryos who are implanted in their wombs are human

    beings, human Persons, right from the beginning of their development. IVF

    Mothers, perhaps better than any of us, understand that the only product of a

    human male and a human female is a human being. A human being that deserves

  • 8/3/2019 Personhood: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

    3/3

    to be protected by love and by law.

    Let's be clear: Personhood WillNOTBan or OutlawInVitroFertilization

    On Starbuck's take-away coffee cups as part of its "TheWayISeeIt" campaign in

    2006 was a profound question posed by WesleyJ.Smith.6

    Here it is:

    "Does every human life have equal moral value simply and merely because it is

    human?

    AnswerYes, and we have a chance of achieving universal human rights.

    AnswerNo, and it means that we are merely another animal in the forest."

    Personhood answers: "Yes".

    Brothers, we really need to talk.

    Reference(s):

    1. According to Dr. Dianne N. Irving, M.A., Ph.D.; former career-appointed bench research biologist/biochemist, NCI, NIH;

    philosopher and medical ethicist (http://bit.ly/tLE8zB), the embryo must be in the correct stage of development in order to implant in

    the woman's uterus. If he or she is too young or too old implantation will not happen and the embryo simply dies. This is the basis

    for some of the mechanisms of action used in most contraceptives.

    2. Houston, Texas September 7, 2010 American College of Embryology (ACE) opposes ruling DH-08-001 pending in

    California, which aims to regulate human embryos as diagnostic specimens (http://bit.ly/f2RYVT).

    3. Ibid.

    4. Wesley J. Smith, "American College of Embryology Opposes Defining Embryos as Mere 'Diagnostic Specimens' in California"

    (http://bit.ly/svLs43).

    5. Wesley J. Smith, Featured on Starbuck's take-away coffee cups as part of its "The Way I See It" 2006 Campaign

    (http://bit.ly/b83dKq)6. Ibid.

    Click Here To Support Our Work. The Issues4Life Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. All

    donations are tax deductible. To send a donation via U.S. Mail, please make the check or money order payable to

    the "Issues4Life Foundation" and send it to the address below.

    Issues4Life Foundation

    1684 Decoto Road, Suite 261

    Union City, California 94587-3544

    [email protected]

    www.issues4life.org

    California Civil Rights Foundation

    1684 Decoto Road, Suite 251

    Union City, California 94587-3544

    [email protected]

    www.civilrightsfoundation.org

    Copyright 2011 Issues4Life Foundation | California Civil Rights Foundation. All rights reserved.To ensure our newsletter always reaches your inbox, please add the above "FROM" email address to your

    address book. If you prefer not to receive news from us in the future, you can unsubscribe here.