personal strategies for improving your ref publications
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Personal Strategies for Improving your REF Publications
Andrew Booth, Director of Information, ScHARR
![Page 2: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
• ScHARR REF Audit• Personal Publication Strategies
– Ian De Pendent– Matt O'Dologhy– Ann Hahnze– Di Kotomos– Enid Chiate
• Profiles and Practical Suggestions• REF Impact Case Studies and Individual
Researchers
![Page 3: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ScHARR REF Audit• REF Census – Publications (2008-2009)
and Potential Impact Stories (2009- backwards)
• 116 staff returned forms• 18 staff (maternity leave, sick leave, non-
compliant) estimated returns (Mendeley database of 1201 ScHARR publications) at
• 24 queries regarding eligibility/statusTotal = 158 individuals
![Page 4: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
How Are We Doing?
• 67/158 [42%] had 4+ publications
• 9/158 [6%] had 3 publications
• 13/158 [8%] on track for 4 publications
Total 89/158
• Caveat: No consideration of Eligibility↓, no consideration of Quality of Journals↓, no consideration of Congruence↓ but also no concession for WTE↑
![Page 5: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
That’s Good Isn’t It?
• Yes, but……
……ScHARR research typically conducted as multidisciplinary teams
……Individual papers can only be submitted once
……Therefore we are most interested in First Authored Papers and ScHARR-
First Authored Papers
![Page 6: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Because….?
• First Authored Papers – Not affected by collaborators from other institutions or by staff joining ScHARR (11 staff have 4 first authored papers; 41 have 2+)
• ScHARR-First Authored Papers – Not affected by ScHARR staff higher up “pecking order” (35 staff have 4 papers as first or only ScHARR author)
• Also interested in congruence between papers and any Unit of Assessment, but particularly HSR.
![Page 7: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
And What About Citations?
• Average number of citations was just under 2/3 of a citation (Mean = 0.63; median = 0; mode = 0)
• Highest total was 59 citations from 6 papers (including 33 for one pre-ScHARR paper)
• Most higher impact papers had clinical leadership/involvement and published in clinical journals
![Page 8: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Current Verdict
• We work hard, we are prolific, we have a good environment and perform well for esteem (as for RAE)
• However we appear to privilege quantity over quality and have very few high impact papers (hence Power Rating for RAE)
• Is our work good enough? • Do we aim high enough? ?• Are we in our comfort zone? ?
![Page 9: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
To Illustrate
4/6 articles
?
+1 in 31st Journal; 1 with No Impact Factor
![Page 10: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What Can We Do Collectively?
• Target “better” journals
• More strategic discussion re: Authorship
• More partnerships with Clinicians
• More synthesis of Methodology across similar projects
• More follow up work/secondary data analysis looking at Impact of Primary Work (c.p. DEC evaluation)
![Page 11: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ISI Health Care Sciences and Services [1-10]
Only 7 of these would get into Top 20 for Medicine
![Page 13: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ISI Health Care Sciences and Services [11-20]
![Page 14: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL (Top 20)
Health Technology Assessment would appear here
![Page 15: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ScHARR’s Top 20 Papers during REF Period so far
• BMJ (2)• Lancet (2)• Quality & Safety in Health
Care---------------------------• Medical Decision Making• Pharmacoeconomics (2)• Value in Health---------------------------• 8 with ScHARR 1st Author• 3 RCTs, 2 SRs, 3
Outcomes, 4 Cost Effect.
• Acad Emerg Med• Age and Ageing• Am J Kidney Diseases• Arthritis & Rheumatism• Breast Cancer Research &
Treatment • Diabetic Medicine• Eye• European Journal of Cancer• J Clin Endocr & Metabol• Nephrology Dialysis
Transplantation
![Page 16: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Any Questions/Comments?
![Page 19: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Profile – Ian De Pendent
• Typically PI• Typically 2 or More
Projects over period• 4 or More ScHARR
First Authored Publications
![Page 20: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
No!
![Page 21: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
• Aim to Improve One or More of Your Journals (from Citation List) or Papers
• Write with Clinician
• Counts Double!: Better Paper for You, Releases One to ScHARR Colleague
• Look at Co-Authoring as Second Author with ScHARR Colleague
• Mentoring
![Page 22: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Profile – Matt O’Dologhy
• Typically Health Economist, Modeller, Statistician or Info Scientist
• Involved in Many Projects, some Clinician-led
• 3-4 Publications, none as First Author
![Page 23: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
• Second-Authored Papers with Non-ScHARR Clinician
• First-Authored Papers (Perhaps as PI/Project Manager)
• 1-2 Methodology Papers Synthesising Findings from Multiple Projects
• Aim to get Methodology Papers Open Access (BMC/White Rose)
![Page 24: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Profile – Ann Hahnze
• Two or Three Papers in Peer Reviewed journals
• May be PI on One or More Projects
• Spending More Time “Doing” than Writing?
![Page 25: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
• Aim to Produce More Papers [1 or 1.5 per Writing Week)
• Try to “Trump” Existing Papers by Publishing in Higher Impact Journals
• Protected Time
• Team Writing
• Peer Support
![Page 26: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Profile – Di Kotomos
• Quite new to HSR• Mixed portfolio –
disciplinary (e.g. Psychology, IS, or Social Science) and topical publications
• E.g. Reviewer with previous early stage research or Info Specialist also involved in reviews
• Potentially split across Units of Assessment
![Page 27: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
• Need to Prioritise One Half of Portfolio• Discuss with Line Manager and Unit of
Assessment Leads• Then Focus on Replacing Current Papers
as First ScHARR Author with those that fit Target UoA
• May Release Papers to Other Co-Authors• Also Contribute to Team Writing for
General Career Progression
![Page 28: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Profile – Enid Chiate
• Recent entrant to HSR
• Mainly working on one project at a time
• One or two papers as member of research team
![Page 29: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Personal Publication Strategy?
• Identify Sub-Project or Re-analysis as Potential First Author Paper
• Target a Mid-to-Higher Range Journal
• Take advantage of Mentoring, Writing Club and Publications Training Courses
• Continue to Participate in Team Writing
• Discuss Timescale for REF Eligibility with Line Manager
![Page 30: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Any Questions/Comments?
![Page 31: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Practical Suggestions/Reminders
Targeting Journals and Monitoring Impact
![Page 32: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Journal Finder
• Research Gate's The Journal Finder.
Research Gate - scientific network to connect researchers, find research partners, collaborate with scientists and explore journal articles.
• With more than 20,000 print Journals, Journal Finder helps discover which journals are most relevant to your research.
• Copy and Paste your article's abstract into their semantic search algorithm, and it will identify relevant journals.
• Includes information on publication restrictions as well as more information (e.g. impact factor) about journal.
![Page 33: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Demonstration
![Page 37: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Tip - Look through your list of references
Journal titles that appear several times are candidates for your article.
![Page 38: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
http://mulford.meduohio.edu/instr/
http://mulford.meduohio.edu/instr/
![Page 39: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Web of Science analysis
http://wok.mimas.ac.uk/
![Page 41: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Analyze Results
![Page 42: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Demonstration
![Page 45: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
If at first you don’t succeed…planning for contingencies
Use the “stable” approachE.g. BMJ - Annals of Rheumatic Diseases
Sexually Transmitted Infections Archives of Disease in Childhood Thorax British Journal of Ophthalmology British Journal of Sports Medicine Injury Prevention Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health Emergency Medicine Journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine Gut Tobacco Control Heart Journal of Clinical Pathology Journal of Medical Ethics Journal of Medical Genetics Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Medical Humanities Postgraduate Medical Journal Quality & Safety in Health Care
![Page 46: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Recycle, recycle, recycle
• Three strikes and you’re out! – try up to three times
• Take on comments and suggestions (especially suggested target journals)
• Consider slicing or repackaging.
![Page 47: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Researcher ID
• Accessed through University Library -> Web of Science -> Additional Resources
• Creates Unique Identifier for you• You can link yourself to your own Web of
Science Publications• You then have permanent profile for your
outputs• Updated for all stored publications• Add each year’s publications as you go
![Page 48: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Increasing your Impact through White Rose
Research Online
![Page 54: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
WRRO: go for it
• Increase visibility & citation impact
• URLs for long term links
• Supports Open Access– Required by funders– Free to all
• WRRO FAQs at http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/docs/faq.html
![Page 55: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Contacts
• Marion TattersallResearch Development LibrarianGeneric research support issues [email protected] phone: 27281 Mon-Thurs
• Anthea TuckerScience Engineering and Medicine Liaison Team assistantWRRO practicalities [email protected] phone:27318
• Rachel ProudfootWhite Rose Repository Officer WRRO policy and development issues [email protected] tel: 0113 343 7067
![Page 56: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Final Reminders
• Target Appropriate Journals• Aim to Trump Existing Journal Portfolio• Plan Strategically – Your “liberated”
publications may swell someone else’s portfolio!
• Peer Support/Mentoring etcetera • Remember: It is not Authorship (or even
necessarily First Authorship) But It Is First ScHARR Authorship that is Critical
![Page 57: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Brief Word About Impact
![Page 58: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Overall excellence
Outputs Impact Environment
60%?? 25%??
↓15%??
NB. Impact replaces Esteem; Some Esteem subsumed within Environment
![Page 59: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Assessing impact
• “Significant additional recognition where institutions and researchers have built on excellent research to deliver demonstrable benefits to the economy, society, public policy, culture or quality of life”.
![Page 60: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Principles of Impact
• Impact of submitting unit as whole, not impact of individual researchers.
• Submissions to provide examples of research-driven impact from unit’s broad portfolio of work.
• Impacts to be underpinned by high-quality research. (Focus of REF on research excellence, with additional recognition for strong impact built on that excellence).
• Because of time-lags, impact must be evident during REF assessment period, but research may have been undertaken earlier (up to 10-15 years earlier).
![Page 61: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Assessment of Impact
• Qualitative information informed by appropriate indicators.• Submissions to include:
– Impact statement, generic template for submitted unit as a whole. Breadth of interactions with research users and overview of positive impacts that became evident during assessment period.
– Case studies, generic template to illustrate specific examples of impact and how unit contributed to them.
• One case study/5-10 members of staff.• Case studies and impact statement to include appropriate
indicators of impact, to support narrative evidence.
![Page 62: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Draft template for impact case studies
1. Title of case study.2. Describe/provide evidence of specific benefit or impact (maximum
500 words), including:– nature of impact; how far-reaching and significant benefits are– appropriate indicators of impact (from “common menu”)
3. Explain how unit’s research activity contributed or led to impact (maximum 500 words), including:– outline of underpinning research, when undertaken and by whom– efforts made by staff to exploit or apply findings or secure impact through
research expertise– any other significant factors or contributions to impact.
4. Provide references to:– key research outputs that underpin the impact– external reports or documents, or contact details of a user, to corroborate impact
or unit’s contribution
![Page 63: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
How Impact Assessed
• Assessed by REF expert sub-panels, comprising people who understand research in discipline and its wider use and benefits supplemented with research users to assess impacts.
• Sub-panels to assess impact against criteria of:– reach (how widely impacts have been felt);– significance (how transformative impacts have
been). • Subprofile - proportion of impacts meeting each
level on five-point scale. Four-star (‘exceptional’) rating - ‘ground-breaking, transformative or of major value, relevant to a range of situations’.
![Page 64: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Sample Indicators: Improved patient care or health outcomes
• Research income from NHS and medical research charities• Measures of improved health outcomes (for example, lives saved,
reduced infection rates)• Measures of improved health services (for example, reduced
treatment times or costs, equal access to services)• Changes to clinical or healthcare training, practice or guidelines
(including refs in relevant docs such as National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines)
• Devt of new/improved drugs, treatments or other medical interventions; nos. of advanced phase clinical trials
• Participation on health policy/advisory committees• Changes to public behaviour (for example, reductions in smoking)
![Page 65: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Impact in the Context of the REF
• King’s College, Friday 25th June 2010• Report of Impact Pilots• All Powerpoints Available from:
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iss/support/ref/june2010
HEADLINES:• Measuring Impact is feasible but time-
consuming• Final weighting not decided yet• Requires skills in marketing, media, journalism• Can’t really handle “negative impact”
![Page 66: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
![Page 67: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
![Page 68: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
The Way Forward
• We have asked Staff to Nominate Impact Stories• Combined List shared with Research Committee• At RC Meeting tomorrow initial list of 8 Case
Studies will be compiled• Approximately 3 Case Studies will be worked up
over Summer (Pending fuller guidance)• We will be working with PIs and Team Members• We will probably need to develop 2:1 but
valuable for other purposes e.g. Marketing
![Page 69: Personal strategies for improving your ref publications](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081403/556487d0d8b42a5f6c8b4638/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Any Last Questions or Comments?