performances of concrete repairs in practice graham …

29
CON REP NET CON REP NET PERFORMANCES OF CONCRETE REPAIRS IN PRACTICE Graham Tilly, Gifford and Partners

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jan-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CON REP NETCON REP NET

PERFORMANCES OF CONCRETE REPAIRS IN PRACTICE

Graham Tilly, Gifford and Partners

STRUCTURESSTRUCTURES

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Buildings Bridges Dams Powerstations

Car parks Other

Num

ber

Ages ofAges of StructuresStructures

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-151

Years (to 2003)

Num

ber

ENVIRONMENTSENVIRONMENTS

01020304050607080

Urban Rural Highway Coastal Industrial

Num

ber

WP2 Past Performances

DETERIORATION AND REPAIR

Types of Original DeteriorationTypes of Original Deterioration

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Corrosio

n

Frost

Cracks AAR

Deterio

rated co

ncrete

Poor constr

uction

OtherNu

mbe

r

Ages of Structures when RepairedAges of Structures when Repaired

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-100

Years (to 2003)

Num

ber

Types of RepairTypes of Repair

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Patch Coating Crackinjection

Strengthen Sprayedconcrete

Electro-chemical

Other

Num

ber

PatchesPatches

01020

30405060

7080

Cementitious Polymer modified Other

Num

ber

CoatingsCoatings

05

101520253035404550

Barrier Hydrophobic Anti-carbonation

Other

Num

ber

PERFORMANCES OF REPAIRS

• Successful• Evidence of deterioration• Failed

Performances of all RepairsPerformances of all Repairs

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Successful Evidence ofdeterioration

Failed

Num

ber

Repair Performances, BCA 1997

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Good Fair Poor Failure

Per c

ent

Performances of PatchesPerformances of Patches

05

101520253035

Cementitious Polymermodified

Other

Num

ber

Successful Evidence of deterioration Failed

Performances of CoatingsPerformances of Coatings

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Successful Evidence ofdeterioration

Failed

Num

ber

Performances of Repairs to CorrosionPerformances of Repairs to Corrosion

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Patch Patch + coating Crack injection

Num

ber Successful

Evidence of failureFailed

Performances in Relation to Ages of RepairsPerformances in Relation to Ages of Repairs

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-52

Years

Num

ber Successful

Evidence of failureFailed

Failure of Patch Repair

Failure of sprayed coating

Continued ASR

WP2 Past Performances

MODES AND CAUSES OF FAILURE

Modes of FailureModes of Failure

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Corrosion Cracking Debonding AAR Other

Num

ber

Causes of FailureCauses of Failure

05

101520253035404550

Incorrect d

esign

Material

Poor Workm

anshipWrong diag

nosis

Weather

Unknown

Other

Num

ber

Deterioration and Repair Model

Repair Performances

Damage Level Detection

SUMMARY

• 229 Case Histories Analysed

• Disappointing Repair Performances– 25% fail in 5 years– 75% fail in 10 years– 95% fail in 25 years

Summary Continued

• Modes of Repair Failure : continued corrosion, cracking, debonding

• Causes of Repair Failure: wrong diagnosis, wrong design, wrong material and poor workmanship

Recommendations

• Repair materials should be compatible with the substrate

• Repair materials should be flexible

• Repair materials should be forgiving