performance review institute - opening comments ... · web viewthis was p. heppe’s of the boeing...

11
ELASTOMER SEALS FEBRUARY 2014 CONFIRMED CONFIRMED MINUTES FEBRUARY 24-26, 2014 LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM These minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency. Monday, 24 February to Wednesday, 26 February 2014 1.0 OPENING COMMENTS – CLOSED / OPEN 1.1 Call to Order / Quorum Check The Elastomer Seals Task Group (SEAL) was called to order at 9:00 a.m., 24-Feb-2014. It was verified that only SUBSCRIBER MEMBERS were in attendance during the closed portion of the meeting. A quorum was established with the following representatives in attendance: Subscriber Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member) NAME COMPANY NAME * Tara Campbell Rolls-Royce plc * Kent DeFranco Lockheed Martin Corp. Proxy; B. Clothier, S. Kronabetter * Melissa Facas Pratt & Whitney * Patrick Heppe The Boeing Company * Manuel Koucouthakis Honeywell Aerospace Chairperson; Proxy for J. Hudspeth Luis Gustavo Pacheco Embraer Konstantina Stefanidou Honeywell Aerospace * Estrella Watson Goodrich (UTAS) Vice Chairperson: Proxy M. Gage Other Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member) NAME COMPANY NAME * Jon Cutler Trelleborg Sealing Solutions

Upload: others

Post on 05-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

CONFIRMED MINUTESFEBRUARY 24-26, 2014

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM

These minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency.

Monday, 24 February to Wednesday, 26 February 2014

1.0 OPENING COMMENTS – CLOSED / OPEN

1.1 Call to Order / Quorum Check

The Elastomer Seals Task Group (SEAL) was called to order at 9:00 a.m., 24-Feb-2014.

It was verified that only SUBSCRIBER MEMBERS were in attendance during the closed portion of the meeting.

A quorum was established with the following representatives in attendance:

Subscriber Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)

NAME COMPANY NAME

* Tara Campbell Rolls-Royce plc* Kent DeFranco Lockheed Martin Corp. Proxy; B. Clothier,

S. Kronabetter* Melissa Facas Pratt & Whitney* Patrick Heppe The Boeing Company* Manuel Koucouthakis Honeywell Aerospace Chairperson; Proxy

for J. HudspethLuis Gustavo Pacheco EmbraerKonstantina Stefanidou Honeywell Aerospace

* Estrella Watson Goodrich (UTAS) Vice Chairperson: Proxy M. Gage

Other Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)

NAME COMPANY NAME

* Jon Cutler Trelleborg Sealing Solutions* Mark Keal Meggitt Polymer & Composites* Royce McDaniel Parker Hannifin* Dave Sykes Meggitt Polymer & Composites

PRI Staff Present

Keith Purnell

1.2 Code of Ethics/ Antitrust and Meeting Conduct

The Antitrust and Nadcap Personal Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest were reviewed with the Task Group in the OPEN and CLOSED meetings.

Page 2: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

1.3 Review Agenda

The agenda for the February 2014 meeting was reviewed. Attendees were given the opportunity to discuss their expectations for this meeting. Expectation agreed upon was the completion and balloting of the combined Compression Molding and Fabric Reinforced Seals Checklists.

2.0 ACCEPTANCE OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES – OPEN

The Minutes from the October 2013 Nadcap meeting were reviewed. Two spelling errors were identified.

Motion made by K. DeFranco and seconded by E. Watson to approve the minutes from the October 2013 Nadcap meeting after correction of the two identified spelling errors. Motion Passed Unanimously.

The minutes from October 2013 were approved.

3.0 MEMBERSHIP STATUS – OPEN

The voting membership was reviewed and proxy votes were recorded.

The voting records and meeting attendance for SEAL Task Group Voting Members, Subscriber and Supplier, were reviewed for compliance to the requirements for maintaining membership. NOP-001 paragraph 3.3.2 states “To maintain Voting Member privileges, the following criteria shall be met unless the Nadcap Management Council (NMC) or Task Group Chair determines that other circumstances warrant retention:

• Voting Member shall not be absent without approved alternate representation (including a full proxy) from three consecutive regular Nadcap NMC/Task Group meetings.

• Voting Member, or approved alternate representation, shall not miss a vote on 2 consecutive letter ballots. A waive shall count as a vote.

All SEAL TG Voting Members met the requirements for meeting attendance and voting on letter ballots.

The February Attendees Guide was reviewed and M. Jevons will be removed as he has changed positions within his organization and will no longer participate in the Seals Task Group.

This was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber Voting Member and for M. Brunet to become the Alternate Subscriber Voting Member.

Motion made by M. Koucouthakis and seconded by E. Watson to approve P. Heppe as a SEAL TG Subscriber Voting Member & M. Brunet as the Alternate Subscriber Voting Member. Motion Passed Unanimously.

M. Keal of Meggitt Polymer and Composites requested to become a SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member; M. Keal has attended more than two meetings.

Motion made by T. Campbell and seconded by E. Watson to approve M. Keal as a SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member. Motion Passed Unanimously.

D. Sykes of Meggitt Polymer and Composites requested to become an Alternate SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member; D. Sykes has attended more than two meetings.

Motion made by T. Campbell and seconded by E. Watson to approve D. Sykes as an Alternate SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member. Motion Passed Unanimously.

Page 3: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

J. Cutler of Trelleborg Sealing Solutions requested to become a SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member replacing M. Jeavons; J. Cutler has attended more than two meetings.

Motion made by T. Campbell and seconded by E. Watson to approve J. Cutler as a SEAL TG Supplier Voting Member. Motion Passed Unanimously.

M. Facas of Pratt & Whitney requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber Voting Member; M. Facas has attended more than two meetings.

Motion made by K. DeFranco and seconded by E. Watson to approve M. Facas as a SEAL TG Subscriber Voting Member. Motion Passed Unanimously.

ACTION ITEM: B. McSorley to process m-frm-01s (Due Date: 30-Mar-2014)

4.0 STAFF REPORT – OPEN

Staff Engineer, K. Purnell, presented the PRI Staff Report that included Auditor Status, SEAL TG Metrics, Audit Cycle Time, Most Common NCR’s, Average number of Major and Minor NCR’s, Latest Changes, Future Nadcap Meeting Dates / Locations and Staff Delegation Metrics. (Attached)

The next SEAL TG meeting will be in Dublin, Ireland. Meeting will begin on Monday 23-Jun-2014 and end 1:00 p.m. Wednesday 25-Jun-2014.

5.0 SUPPLIER SUPPORT COMMITTEE REPORT – OPEN

K. Purnell presented the Supplier Support Committee (SSC) update that included an overview of the SSC Leadership Team, how the SSC helps suppliers, current SSC activities and their new supplier initiatives. For additional information please review the SSC minutes posted on the PRI website at www.p-r-i.org.

6.0 REVIEW NTGOP-001 APPENDIX SEAL – OPEN

6.1 Ballot Comment Resolution

The latest changes in Draft NTGOP-001 Appendix SEAL that had been balloted to the SEAL Task Group were reviewed. The ballot closed with zero comments so the appendix was sent to NMC on a 14 day affirmation ballot that will close 6-MAR-2014.

7.0 AUDITOR CONFERENCE – OPEN

7.1 Auditor Conference Presentations Topics and Material Development

The SEAL TG Specific Auditor Conference tentatively will begin on Saturday, 18-Oct-2014 at 1:00 pm and end on Sunday, 19-Oct-2014 at 10:00 am. Topics will include:

Most Common NCRs and NCR Data Analysis for Consistencyo Conducted by: K. Purnell

Auditing Captive Laboratories per AC7122o Conducted by: T. Campbell, M. Koucouthakis and K. Purnell

Fabric Reinforced Sealso Conducted by: E. Watson, M. Koucouthakis

Subscriber Requirementso Conducted by: T. Campbell, M. Koucouthakis

Page 4: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

Audit Preparation Europe vs Americaso Conducted by: T. Campbell, K. Purnell

Question / Answer / Open Discussion Sessiono Conducted by: K. Purnell, Subscribers and Auditors

Additional SEAL auditors are needed, it was requested that if any attendees knew of an individual with Seal Manufacturing background that would be interested in becoming an auditor, they should contact Keith Purnell at [email protected]. One auditor candidate was identified.

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to schedule an auditor interview conference call with the candidate and the SEAL Task Group. (Due Date: 31-Mar-2014)

8.0 AUDIT FAILURE CRITERIA - OPEN

Review Audit Failure Criteria, Single Year Data Compare to Multiple Years of Data

Audit failure criteria from 1 year, 2013, 2 years, 2012 and 2013 combined, 3 years, 2011, 2012 and 2013 combined and 4 years, 2010 to 2013 combined, were reviewed. The reason for reviewing multiple years of data is the limited number of audits performed by the SEAL Task Group. NOP-011 paragraph 4.2 states “New Task Groups are requested to define their failure criteria (Mode B) once a statistically valid number of audits (e.g. 32 audits) have been conducted or at the second anniversary of their checklist publication”. It required 4 years of SEAL audit data to exceed 32 audits. A third day failure criteria also needs to be addressed as Seal manufacturers with a captive lab that is not ISO/IEC 17025 accredited will be required to be audited to the AC7122 checklists.

Establish SEAL Task Group Failure Criteria for 2014

SEAL reviewed the above data and the number of NCR’s per day remained the same and matched the existing failure criteria regardless of the number of years of data used.

Motion made by K. DeFranco and seconded by E. Watson to establish a failure criteria of 2 Major and 3 total NCR’s per day up to 3 audit days. Motion Passed Unanimously.

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to notify M. Graham of the new SEAL failure criteria for 2014. (Due Date: 31-Mar-2014)

9.0 AC7115 AND AC7128 DRAFT COMBINED AUDIT CHECKLIST – OPEN

9.1 Progress Report from SEAL Sub-Team

A SEAL Sub-Team worked on combining the AC7115 and AC7128 checklists for 2-1/2 days during the October 2013 Nadcap meeting. The majority of the general checklist questions including the job audit matrix have been completed; the next step is to develop the job audits questions and format.

9.2 Review and Revision of Draft Checklist

The Draft combined Compression Molding and Fabric Reinforced Seals audit checklist was reviewed and there were numerous questions on how the auditors will use the matrix to determine the applicable audit questions. The checklist format used is the same as Composites (COMP) TG but the majority of SEAL Task Group members were not familiar with this format. After there was a general understanding of how the COMP TG checklist format functions the Task Group broke up into three sub-teams, each developing job audits for different processes.

ACTION ITEM: Sub-Teams to send job audit questions to K. Purnell (Due Date: 1-Mar-2014)

ACTION ITEM: M. Koucouthakis to Draft Checklist Scope and Capability Matrix. (Due Date: 1-Mar-2014)

Page 5: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

ACTION ITEM: B. McSorley to combine revised checklist questions into one new draft document. (Due Date: 21-Mar-2014)

ACTION ITEM: B. McSorley to invite meeting attendees to a WebEx for discussing next steps in checklist revision. (Due Date: 21-Mar-2014)

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to conduct WebEx by 1-Apr-2014 to discuss Checklist and establish subsequent meeting schedule. (Due Date: 1-Apr-2014)

ACTION ITEM: M. Koucouthakis to develop a definitions and acronym section for the combined Compression Molding and Fabric Reinforced Seals audit checklist that includes out-time, shelf life, and pot life definitions. (Due Date: 1-Jun-2014)

10.0 AUDITS – CLOSED

10.1 Review Scheduled and Conducted Audits

The current SEAL audit schedule for the next three (3) months was reviewed; Subscribers were encouraged to observe audits to support the Auditor Consistency pilot program.

No SEAL audits were in Supplier, Staff Engineer or Task Group Review.

10.2 Discuss Problem Audits

There were no problem audits to discuss.

11.0 AUDITORS – CLOSED

11.1 Data Analysis Review – Overall Auditor Performance

Auditor performance was reviewed and included the most common checklist paragraph referenced in NCRs traceable to the Auditors that wrote the NCRs, audit oversight feedback, average and total NCR per day written by the Auditors. This information is used for evaluating auditor consistency. There was a limited amount of data to review because of the small number of auditors and audits conducted. The need for an additional Americas based SEAL Auditor was identified after reviewing this data. Two additional training topics were identified and incorporated into the 2014 Auditor Conference Outline.

12.0 STAFF ENGINEER DELEGATION – CLOSED

The SEAL TG reviewed the Delegation Tracking Form for K. Purnell. Staff Engineer K. Purnell met the minimum criteria of having at least 10% of findings reviewed by the Task Group Subscribers with at least a 90% concurrence rate. Staff Engineer maintains delegated status.

13.0 CLOSED MEETING ISSUES – CLOSED

SEAL TG Requested the Closed meeting time be increased from 1 hour to 1-1/2 hours.

14.0 MEETING CLOSE-OUT – CLOSED

14.1 Review of Action Items Assigned During the Meeting

All action items were reviewed and due dates established. For specific details, please see the current SEAL Rolling Action Item List posted at www.eAuditNet.com, under Public Documents.

14.2 Set Next Meeting Agenda Topics

June 2014 Closed meeting agenda topics were agreed to be the same as this meeting’s agenda topics.

Page 6: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

15.0 JOINT MEETING WITH NON METALLIC MATERIALS MANUFACTURING (NMMM) TASK GROUP AND SEAL TASK GROUP – OPEN

15.1 Discussion of Processes that could overlap both Task Groups

M. Koucouthakis the SEAL TG Chairperson reviewed the current initiatives of the SEAL TG attached below.

Several of these initiatives have some overlap with NMMM such as:

Draft Fabric Reinforced Seals Checklist may impact the AC7122 as SEAL has not identified test requirements for fabric.

SEAL Task Group needs to address press and curing oven calibration requirements and NMMM Task Group is working on AMS2750/1.

Both Task Groups use AC7122 so collaboration on auditor training may be beneficial for consistency.

ACTION ITEM: E. Watson, M. Keal and S. Stefanidou to create a list of lab mechanical tests required for seal related fabric / textile. (Due Date: 1-Jun-2014)

ACTION ITEM: T. Campbell to attend the 26-Feb 2014 NMMM and Heat Treat joint meeting on AMS2750/1 and report back to the SEAL TG. (Due Date: 26-Feb-2014)

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to meet with J. Tibma and determine if any Composites auditors are interested in also performing SEAL audits. (Due Date: 30-Apr-2014)

ACTION ITEM: T. Campbell to obtain copy of Composites questions for Composites to Metal Bonding, to be reviewed at June 2014 SEAL TG meeting. (Due Date: 1-Jun-2014)

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to arrange for a ½ hour joint meeting between NMMM and the SEAL TG at the June 2014 Nadcap meeting to discuss AC7122 auditor training and Fabric / Textile lab test requirements. (Due Date: 15-Apr-2014)

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to determine topics to be addressed for seals in the AC7122-P auditor training. (Due Date: 31-Mar-2014)

16.0 ARP 3051 MOLDED ELASTOMER COMPONENT MANUFACTURING PROCESS REQUIREMENTS – OPEN

16.1 Review of Progress on Draft ARP 3051

The AMS P committee is developing ARP 3051 Molded Elastomer Components Manufacturing Processing Requirements. There are weekly one hour conference calls for developing this document. SEAL TG members have been participating and are encouraged to participate in the development of this document.

SEAL TG reviewed Draft ARP 3051 titled Molded Elastomer Components Manufacturing Processing Requirements. The fabric reinforced seals manufacturing process is also being incorporated into this ARP as it is necessary to comply with the Nadcap Management Council Checklist Vision. The ARP will be issued as an Aerospace Standard when completed.

Page 7: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

17.0 AC7122P MATERIAL LAB AUDIT TIME REQUIREMENTS – OPEN

17.1 Subscriber Feedback on Time Required to Perform Captive Lab Audit

Auditor time required to complete AC7122P /1, /2 and /4 questions was discussed. The elastomer specific questions in AC7122P /1, /2 and /4 were reviewed and a total of three different methods of testing are required to be audited. It is not necessary to review all testing methods in one audit as it is the intent that they will be audited on a rolling review basis.

During the 2013 Auditor Conference the auditors thought an additional day would be required to perform this lab audit and the SEAL TG agrees with the auditors’ time assessment. This audit would only be required for Seals Manufacturers whose internal lab is not ISO/IEC 17025 accredited.

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to verify the SEAL TG Preliminary Questionnaire is clear in identifying the AC7122 audit is required unless the manufacturers’ captive laboratory is ISO/IEC 17025 accredited. (Due Date: 30-Mar-2014)

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to email seal manufacturers and clarify the AC7122 lab audit is required unless their captive lab is ISO/IEC 17025 accredited. (Due Date: 20-Mar-2014)

18.0 NOP-012 AUDITOR CONSISTENCY – OPEN

The SEAL TG reviewed the revised NOP-012 and the Auditor Consistency Milestone Plan presentation. They then updated their Milestone spreadsheet to track their progress in the Auditor Consistency pilot program. There was a limited amount of data to review because of the small number of auditors and audits conducted by the TG. Auditor observation appears to be the best way for evaluating SEAL auditors.

ACTION ITEM: K. Purnell to update the Auditor Consistency Milestone Spreadsheet and post the Audit Observation Plan. (Due Date: 20-Mar-2014)

19.0 SEAL TG INITIATIVES – OPEN

Review and update SEAL Task Group Priorities

SEAL Task Group created the following list of activities and rated them as High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) priority and if they are (A) Active, (N) Not Active or (C) Closed. Where multiple activities have the same priority designation, numbers can be used to further clarify the activities level of importance. This list was created so the SEAL TG maintains focus on its high priority tasks.

• (HA1) AS Standard for Seal Manufacturing • (HA1) Create Outline for AS Standard to Address Fabric Reinforced Seals• (HA1) Identify new auditors• (HA1) Fabric Reinforced Seals Checklist, Combining AC7115 and AC7128 to AC7118 format• (HA2) AMS2750/1 Sub-Team Press / Curing oven control• (HA2) Captive Laboratory Audit Questions For Fabric / Textile for AC7122 Checklist • (MA) Add Contamination and Questions from process specs when released to AC7115B &

AC7128 • (MA) Formal SEAL specific Auditor Training Program AC7115, AC7128 & AC7122• (MA) Add Fabric to AC7122/1• (LA) Mixing Facilities – Take Question of Audit Mandate to SAE AMS CE Elastomers

Committee• (LA) Quality system applicable to mixing facility (QPG)?• (LA) Seal Fabricators – SAE AMS CE and RMA Define the Terms Fabricator, Compounder,

Lot, Batch• (LN) Value Added Distributors (Purchase Order Flow down)• (LN) Distributor Labeling of Elastomeric Parts

Page 8: Performance Review Institute - OPENING COMMENTS ... · Web viewThis was P. Heppe’s of The Boeing Company second meeting attended and he requested to become a SEAL TG Subscriber

ELASTOMER SEALSFEBRUARY 2014

CONFIRMED

20.0 NEW BUSINESS – OPEN

No new business was discussed.

21.0 MEETING CLOSE-OUT – OPEN

All action items were reviewed and due dates established. For specific details, please see the current SEAL Rolling Action Item List posted at www.eAuditNet.com, under Public Documents.

The next Nadcap SEAL TG meeting is 23-25 June 2014 in Dublin, Ireland.

The June 2014 SEAL TG Open Meeting Agenda topics will include:

• Staff Report• SSC Report• Feedback from AMS CE Meeting• Review of AC7115 / AC7128 Combined Audit Checklist• Fabric Reinforced Seals ARP• NOP-012 Auditor Consistency • Joint meeting with NMMM• 2014 Auditor Conference• SEAL Task Group Initiatives• New Business

ADJOURNMENT – 26-Feb-2014 – Meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m.

Minutes Prepared by: Keith Purnell, [email protected]

***** For PRI Staff use only: ******

Are procedural/form changes required based on changes/actions approved during this meeting? (select one)

YES* NO

*If yes, the following information is required:

Documents requiring revision: Who is responsible: Due date:

NOP-011 M. Graham 21-Mar-2014