performance of the crag lfa assay
DESCRIPTION
Performance of the CrAg LFA Assay. Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases and Program in Global Health David Geffen School of Medicine. Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay CrAg LFA. Qualitative Semi-Quantitative (titer). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Performance of the CrAg LFA Assay
Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPHProfessor of Medicine
Division of Infectious Diseases and Program in Global HealthDavid Geffen School of Medicine
Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow AssayCrAg LFA
QualitativeSemi-Quantitative (titer)
FDA-cleared for serum and CSF
3
Study(N)
SensitivitySpecificity
EIA
SensitivitySpecificity
Latex Agglutination
SensitivitySpecificity
Culture
Remarks
Lee, 2012 (209)
100% (35/35) 95.4% (166/174)
8 LFA+/EIA-
Jarvis, 2011(62)
100% (62/62) All 62 were patients with CM hx
Lindsley, 2011(464)
95.6% (87/91)99.5% (371/373)
Sensitivity of EIA vs Bcx was 94% (16/17)
Hansen, 2012 (589)
EIA-1: 100% (41/41) 96.3% (527/547)EIA-2: 96.8% (60/62) 100% (527/527)
20 LFA+/EIA-1-
18 EIA-2+/EIA-1-
2 LFA-/EIA-2+
CrAg LFA test performance in serum
4
Study(N)
SensitivitySpecificity
EIA
SensitivitySpecificity
Latex Agglutination
SensitivitySpecificity
Culture
Remarks
Escandon, 2012(421)
100% (16/16) 96.9% (392/405)
13 LFA+/LA -
Iqbal, 2012(114)
100% (10/10) 98% (102/104)
2 LFA+/LA-
Vijayan, 2012 (197)
100% (101/101) 97.9% (94/96)
2 LFA+/LA- were EIA+
Bestrom, 2012(632)
100% 99.8%
Boulware , 2012(214)
100% (76/76) 96% (152/158)
Gold standard was CSF culture
Lindsley, 2011(17)
100% (17/17) Gold standard was blood culture
CrAg LFA test performance in serum
5
Study(N)
SensitivitySpecificity
EIA
SensitivitySpecificity
Latex Agglutination
SensitivitySpecificity
Culture
Remarks
Boulware 2012(74)
100% (20/20) 100% (54/54)
Gold standard was CSF culture
Rolfes, 2012(112)
98.5%91.5%
Jarvis, 2011(62)
100% (62/62) 62 with prior CM
CrAg LFA test performance in plasma
6
Study(N)
SensitivitySpecificity
EIA
SensitivitySpecificity
Latex Agglutination
SensitivitySpecificity
Culture
Remarks
Boulware , 2012(292)
99% (110/111)98% (178/181)
Gold standard was CSF culture
Jarvis, 2011(62)
98% (61/62) 62 with prior CM
Lindsley, 2011(74)
70.3% (52/74) 81% (51/63) vs. serum LFA
CrAg LFA test performance in urine
7
Study(N)
Location
SensitivitySpecificity
EIA
SensitivitySpecificity
Latex Agglutination
SensitivitySpecificity
Culture
Remarks
Boulware , 2012(150)
100% (80/80) 99% (69/70)
Iqbal, 2012(10)
100% (6/6)100% (4/4)
Hansen, 2012(412)
EIA-1: 100% (15/15) 99.5% (395/397)EIA-2: 100% (16/16) 99.7% (394/395)
2 LFA+/EIA-1-1LFA+/EIA-2-
Rolfes, 2012(161)
(102)
96.2%96.4%
100% 93.5%
98.8%70.4%
100% 93.5%
Lee, 2012 100% (48/48) 98.5% (348/353)
Meridian EIA5 additional LFA+ EIA-
Jarvis, 2011 100% (62/62) 62 with prior CM
CrAg LFA test performance in CSF
8
CrAg Performance Summary• Serum:
– Sensitivity: Median 100% (96.6%-100%)– Specificity: Median 98.0% (95.4%-100%
• Plasma– Sensitivity: Median 100% (98.5%-100%)– Specificity: Median 95.8% (91.5%-100%)
• Urine– Sensitivity: Median 98.0% (70.3-99%)– Specificity: Median 98.3% (98.3%-98.3%)
• CSF– Sensitivity: Median 100% (96.2%-100%)– Specificity: Median 96.4% (93.5%-100%)
9
Conclusions• CrAg LFA is both highly sensitive and specific in various body fluid
specimens. FDA-cleared in serum and CSF.• “False positive” tests might reflect increased sensitivity of LFA vs.
gold standard• Urine and plasma provide exciting potential alternative specimen
types
10
Acknowledgments
• Tara Vijayan, MD, MPH Clinical ID Fellow, UCSF• Sean Bauman, Immy Diagnostics• Tom Chiller, CDC Mycotic Diseases Branch• Monika Roy, CDC Mycotic Diseases Branch• Various researchers who have shared their data