performance improvement through six sigma methodologies a...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
49 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Performance Improvement Through Six Sigma Methodologies
– A Plastic Firm Case Approach
Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Professor, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai
Abstract
Six Sigma is a set of techniques and tools for process improvement. The term Six Sigma originated from terminology
associated with manufacturing, specifically terms associated with statistical modeling of manufacturing processes. The
study was adopted at Plastic firm. The basic purpose of undertaken this study is to explore the effectiveness of using six
sigma technique while manufacturing and to explore the environment that hinder the implementation of Six sigma
production principles of material flows and also the objectives of the study to identify and analyze the root cause of
problems occurred during the manufacturing process and find the effective remedial measures for eliminating the root
cause of the problems of production using six sigma methodologies at the firm. The research design adopted for this
study was Experimental research design. The study make use of secondary data which was collected from the company’s
production reports for a period of 6 months (July’2015 to December’2015) and also study collected literature review
from journals, internet and magazines. The collected data was analyzed and interpreted by making use of tools like Why-
Why analysis, Fishbone diagram, Pareto analysis, Trend analysis, Value stream mapping and Histogram. The major
findings from this study are lengthy times taken for manufacturing process and lack of knowledge among operators and
in-charges. The study also recommended identifying the likely causes of the problems, taking preventive action and
planning contingent action. Finally research was concluded by reducing non-value adding hours in industry to increase
the efficiency of production.
Keyword: Value Stream mapping, Process Capability, On-time delivery, Variability
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In the existing competitive world every customer seeks best and customized products from suppliers in the
stipulated time with low cost. In this current economic situation all sectors are shaken by global meltdown and
crisis. Six-Sigma is a relatively newer concept than Total Quality Management but not exactly its
replacement. The main focus of Total quality management is to maintain existing quality standards whereas
Six Sigma primarily focuses on making small necessary changes in the processes and systems to ensure high
quality. TQM is less visible now than in the early 1990s due to problems including lack of integration,
leadership apathy, a fuzzy concept , unclear quality goals and a failure to break down internal barriers‖ and
conclude that Six Sigma can overcome these deficiencies , stating that Six Sigma„s expansion heralds
a ̳rebirth„ of the quality movement . This has led industries to take hard decisions like cutting off production
owing to the lowered demand. According to Harry and Schroeder (2000), “Six Sigma is not merely a
management concept, but a business process that allows companies to greatly improve their minimal
performance criteria by designing and monitoring everyday business activities in ways that minimize waste
and resources while increasing customer satisfaction.” Hence improving productivity, quality, on time
delivery with reduced costs became the need of the hour. So to become competitive focus should be on cost
reduction to minute details and building quality and to gain agility focus should be given on removing
manufacturing constraints and making manufacturing process smoother. The focus of Six Sigma is not on
counting the defects in processes, but the number of opportunities within a process that could result in defects
so that causes of quality problems can be eliminated before they are transformed into defects (Antony, 2006).
Many companies follow Six Sigma Methodologies for improving their performance by reducing wastage. Six-
Sigma is a set of techniques and tools for process improvement. It seeks to improve the quality of process
outputs by identifying and removing the causes of defects (errors) and minimizing
variability in manufacturing and business processes. It uses a set of quality management methods,
mainly empirical, statistical methods, and creates a special infrastructure of people within the organization
("Champions", "Black Belts", "Green Belts", "Yellow Belts", etc.) who are experts in these methods.
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
50 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
For the term “Six Sigma” there appears to be little consensus on its definition. Proposing an emergent
definition of Six Sigma based on a grounded theory approach, Schroeder et al. (2008) concluded that Six
Sigma offers a new structure that promotes both control and exploration in improvement efforts. They
asserted that academics need to develop a deeper and richer knowledge of Six Sigma so that they do not over
hype or quickly dismiss it.
The maturity of a manufacturing process can be described by a sigma rating indicating its yield or the
percentage of defect-free products it creates. A six sigma process is one in which 99.99966% of all
opportunities to produce some feature of a part are statistically expected to be free of defects (3.4 defective
features per million opportunities) this defect level corresponds to only a 4.5 sigma level.
1.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY
Due to the growth potential of the manufacturing industry and increasing pressure from markets it is important
to find methods that would make manufacturing production more efficient. Such a method could be six sigma
productions that have been widely adopted in recent years. The purpose of the study is to explore the
effectiveness of using six sigma techniques during manufacturing process and also to explore the environment
which hinders their implementation methodologies during material flows.
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
To understand the Six Sigma methodology, tool, and techniques
To understand the level of integration of various functions in company‟s six sigma principles.
To identify and analyze the root cause of problems occurred during the manufacturing process within the
firm.
To find the effective remedial measures for eliminating the root cause of the problems of production using
six sigma methodologies
To find the effectiveness of Six Sigma implementation at within the organization
To give suggestions to improve the six sigma manufacturing operations in the organization.
1.3 LITERATURE REVIEW
Six Sigma is defined as “a well-established approach that seeks to identify and eliminate defects, mistakes or
failures in business processes or systems by focusing on those process performance characteristics that are of
critical importance to customers” (Antony, 2008). Six Sigma is a statistical methodology that aims to reduce
variation in any process (Chakravorty and Shah, 2012; Naslund, 2008), reduce costs in manufacturing and
services, make savings to the bottom line, increase customer satisfaction (Drohomeretski et al., 2013; Shah et
al., 2008; Manville et al., 2012; Naslund, 2008), measure defects, improve product quality, and reduce defects
to 3.4 parts per million opportunities in an organization (Lee and Wei, 2009; Chen and Lyu, 2009). These are
done through powerful analytical and statistical tools and techniques such as Quality Function Deployment
(QFD), Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Statistical Process Control (SPC), Design of Experiments
(DOE), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kano Model, etc. (Bhuiyan et al., 2006).
A review of case studies has identified many reasons for organizations to implement an Lean Six Sigma (LSS)
strategy in the new millennium: for example, to improve their business performance and operational
efficiency, especially in the growth of global markets, to improve product quality (Vinodh et al., 2012), reduce
production costs and enhance customer satisfaction (Chen and Lyu, 2009). More recently, LSS comprises the
implementation of DMAIC methodology with a mix of appropriate tools from the Lean toolkit and Six Sigma
at each step of DMAIC (Kumar et al., 2006; Vinodh et al., 2011). Moreover, the role of DMAIC in LSS is as a
framework and a solid base for successful implementation (Chakravorty and Shah, 2012). Pickrell et al.
(2005) argued that LSS uses the Six Sigma framework as a platform for initiatives in conjunction with Lean
principles and tools.
As a result of ideas about the integration of LSS (Lean Six Sigma) and the interest in LSS by organizations,
researchers have the interest to publish more papers on LSS to try to come up with a comprehensive approach
to achieve CI. For instance, a number of academics have developed an integrated strategy such as the
strategies that were developed by Thomas et al. (2008), Snee and Hoerl (2007), Pepper and Spedding (2010)
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
51 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
and so on. Other researchers have developed a framework for the successful integration of LSS, such as Salah
et al. (2010), Alsmadi and Khan (2010) and Kumar et al. (2006). The benefits and the critical success factors
of applying LSS in parallel are also noted in many case study papers in both the manufacturing and the service
sector (Akbulut-Bailey et al., 2012; Pickrell et al., 2005; Hardeman and Goethals, 2011).
However, the term LSS was first introduced into literature around 2000 LSS teaching was established in 2003
as part of the evolution of Six Sigma (Timans et al., 2012). Since that time, there has been a noticeable
increase in LSS popularity and deployment in the industrial world (Shah et al., 2008), especially in large
organizations in the west such as Motorola, Honeywell, General Electric and many others (Timans et al.,
2012; Laureani and Antony, 2012) and in some small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises (SMEs)
(Kumar et al., 2006). LSS was defined by Snee (2010) as “a business strategy and methodology that increases
process performance resulting in enhanced customer satisfaction and improved bottom line results.” LSS
methodology aims to improve capability in an organization, reduce production costs (Lee and Wei, 2009;
Chen and Lyu, 2009) and maximize the value for shareholders by improving quality (Laureani and Antony,
2012).
However, not all organizations have gained real benefits from LSS as unsuccessful implementation rendered it
ineffective. In addition, there are many gaps that need to be addressed in LSS literature such as benefits,
motivation factors, challenges and limitations (Pepper and Spedding, 2010; Laureani and Antony, 2011).
Hence, the purpose of this paper is to address such gaps within LSS that are most important within the
manufacturing sector and allow them to achieve the most benefits from this strategy, as well as to identify the
gaps and give recommendations for future research.
1.4 RESEARCH GAP
The present study analyzes the gap in application of six sigma methodologies for continuous
production/process sector with a focus on the plastics industry. The goal of this research is to investigate how
six sigma tools can be adapted from the discrete to the continuous manufacturing environment, and to evaluate
their benefits on a specific application instance. Although the process and discrete industry share several
common characteristics, there are areas where they are very different. Both manufacturing settings have
overlap, but at the extreme, each has its unique characteristics.
This research attempts to identify the gap that exists between discrete and continuous manufacturing where six
sigma techniques from the discrete side are directly applicable. Value stream mapping is first used to map the
current state and then to identify the sources of waste and lean tools to eliminate these wastes. The future state
of the map is then developed for a system with six sigma tools applied to it. To quantify the benefits gained
from using lean tools and techniques in the value stream mapping, a detailed simulation model is developed
and a designed experiment is used to analyze the outputs.
1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design: Experimental
Data Source: Secondary data collected from the company‟s production reports.
Study Period: 6 Months – July‟2015 to December‟2015
Tools for Data Analysis:
Why-Why analysis
Fish Bone Diagram
Histogram
Pareto Analysis
Value Stream Mapping
Histogram
1.6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
To analyze the root cause of problems occurred during the manufacturing process
Problem 1: Excessive chips and non-uniform edges found on the products.
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
52 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Reason: Cutting Torch found faulty.
Action Taken: Using Why-Why Analysis we are detecting the root cause and giving a remedial measure to
take corrective action.
1.6.1 TABLE SHOWING ROOT CAUSE DETECTION ON THE CUTTING TORCH BY WHY-WHY
ANALYSIS
Why-Why Analysis Answer Finding and Action
Why Excessive chips and non-
uniform edges occurred
Machine has some problem Machine is running
smoothly
Why machine giving faulty edges Due to pressure, Moisture
content in gases, or Movement
of machine / Torch
Clean and Check Nozzles
size, Check Moisture, and
operation of Torch
Why torch components are not
OK
Lifting gear box Mounting was
loose
Fastening bolts and nuts
were not present
Why Fastening bolts and nuts
were not present
Four drill hole were not
matching
Fixed in only two bolts
Why not replaced The part was not available Take corrective and
preventive action
Interpretation: All kinds of cutting were done through Dissolved Acetylene and Oxygen. Gas is supplied to
the machine by longitudinal hoses. The cutting quality depends on the accurate selection of gases and accurate
positioning of cutting torch. The sensing mechanism maintains the distance between nozzle tip to plate, which
has been recommended by the machine supplier to keep it 10 to 15 mm. It should not be below 10 mm. The
rack and spindle sleeve must be greased every 100 operating hours to reduce this error.
Problem 2: Sensing feeler most frequently do not maintain the recommended distance as per machine
specification.
Reason: It has been observed that the machine was too dirty.
Action Taken: Training has been arranged on CNC Oxy Flame Cutting Machine, by the company for the in-
charges and the operators on recommendation.
1.6.2 CHART SHOWING CAUSE EFFECT DIAGRAM FOR DEPICTING SENSING FEELER FAILURE
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
53 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Interpretation: It has been observed that the machine was too dirty and due to this the sensing feeler most
frequently do not maintain the recommended distance as per machine specification, the lifting gear box of the
single torch was to be mounted in a cast aluminium box to keep the device light. The clutch on the top of the
box prevented the lifting shaft from being bent. It was interesting to note that, the mounting of the cast
aluminium box was not proper. Apart from the above timely cleaning of nozzle was not a regular practice.
Problem 3: Lengthy times for manufacturing Thermo Flasks
Reason: Reasons are due to more non-value added hours in production.
Action Taken: Value Streamed the production process and traced out the Value added and non-value added
time consumed in each process and by each resource.
1.6.3 TABLE SHOWING VALUE STREAM MAPPING BEFORE SIX SIGMA IMPLEMENTATION-PRODUCTION PHASE OF THERMO FLASK
S.
No
Operation in
Sequence
Machine-wise Activity
Description
Resources Involved Time
Taken
(Minutes)
Category (Value
Added(VA))/Non-Value
Added(NVA))
1 Raw Material
handling
Handling from stock yard to
Cortina M/c
1 Helper, EOT Crane,
1 Operator
25 NVA
2 Data conversion DNC to CNC Cortina Machine 1 Engineer, 1
computer
10 NVA
3 CNC Cutting At Cortina Machine 1 Operator 35 VA
4 Material Removal &
shifting
Cortina Machine 2 helper, 1 Crane, 1
inspector
55 NVA
5 Material Preparation Manual Grinding 2 Operators,2
grinding machines
25 NVA
6 Inspection Manual Grinding 1 Inspector 20 NVA
7
Seggregation &
Shifting
Material preparation,
Bending,Assembly or Machining
1 Operator, 1 Helper,
fork lifts trolleys,
Crane
30 NVA
8 Assembly Collection of prepared material for
assembly
1 Operator, 2 Helper,
Fixtures, Gauges
40 VA
9 Inspection Assembly 1 Inspector 20 NVA
10 Loading & setting at
Manipulator
For welding EOT Crane, 1
Operator
15 NVA
11 Welding MIG welding 1 Operator, CO2 Gas,
Welding Machine
60 VA
12 Inspection UT machine 1 Inspector 25 NVA
13 Unloading & shifting
to machinery
Unloading by EOT Crane 1 Helper, Fork lift 20 NVA
14 Setting at VTL For machining 1 Helper, EOT Crane,
1 Operator
20 NVA
15 Base Machining Fixture & special tool 1 Operator 50 VA
16 Inspection Vernier, Jig 1 Inspector 20 NVA
17 Unloading & Shifting
to Boring
Fork lift, EOT Crane 1 Helper, 1 EOT
Crane, Operator
20 NVA
18 Setting at Horizontal
Boring
For machining 1 Helper, EOT
Crane, 1 Operator
50 NVA
19 Boring Ø 90±1., Ø 80±1 1 Operator 20 VA
20 Inspection Vernier, Jig 1 Inspector 20 NVA
21 Unloading & Shifting
to Drilling & Tapping
Fork lift, EOT Crane 1 Helper 20 NVA
22 Setting at Radial Drill For Drilling 1 Helper, EOT Crane,
1 Operator
75 VA
23 Drilling & Tapping Ø 15.5+0.2, Ø 20+0.3 1 Operator 25 NVA
24 Inspection Gauge, Tap 1 Inspector 15 NVA
25 Unloading & Shifting
to cleaning
Fork lift, EOT Crane 1 Helper, Fork lift,
EOT Crane
20 NVA
26 Cleaning & surface
treatment
Phosphating & Rust oil 1 Operator, 1 helper 25 NVA
27 Inspection Visually 1 Inspector 10 NVA
Note: EOT – Electric Overhead Traveling
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
54 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
1.6.4 CHART SHOWING VALUE STREAM MAPPING BEFORE SIX SIGMA
IMPLEMENTATION-PRODUCTION PHASE OF THERMO FLASK
Interpretation: From the above value stream chart it is interpreted that total time elapsed for manufacturing
thermo flask is 12.83 hours. Before six sigma implementation the firm has more non-value added category
(8.16 hours) which makes the firm to have longer lead time for completing the finished product. The
management continuously carry out to identify the reasons for non-value added hours.
Problem 4: Leakage in Insulated Bottles
Reason: Leakage, Dirt & Miscellaneous
Action Taken: Pareto Analysis conducted to depict the Defect Percentage and immediate action taken
1.6.5 TABLE SHOWING THE DEFECTS OCCURRED IN INSULATED BOTTLES
Type of defects Number of Defects % of Defects Cumulative %
Leaking 4495 64.5 64.5
Miscellaneous 1686 24.19 88.69
Dirty 788 11.31 100
Total 6969 100
1.6.6 PARETO CHART OF DEFECTS OCCURRED IN INSULATED BOTTLES
Interpretation: Pareto analysis was carried out to identify the utmost occurring defects and prioritize the
most critical problem which was required to be tackled. The collected data was generated in the form of a
Pareto chart.
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
55 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
1.6.7 TABLE SHOWING TRAINING GIVEN TO MOULD HANDLERS & OPERATORS
Year Lean Tools Job Training To Mold handlers
Jun-15 2 2 0
Jul-15 4 4 1
Aug-15 5 7 0
Sep-15 6 3 0
Oct-15 2 8 0
Nov-15 0 2 0
Dec-15 1 3 1
1.6.8 CHART SHOWING TRAINING GIVEN TO MOULD HANDLERS & OPERATORS
Interpretation: After implementation of proper maintenance schedule and giving training to the operators
and maintenance persons, data were collected to estimate the improvement in quality in terms of rejection.
The trend analysis of 6 month has been plotted and presented in the above trend chart. It broadly highlights as
accepted or rejected. It is clear from the above analysis that rejection has almost negligible due to attaining the
skill within a very short time after the training.
1.6.9 TABLE SHOWING DEFECTS IN PLASTIC MOULDS RECTIFIED AFTER SIX SIGMA TRAINING
Days Total Item Cut Accepted Rejected
1 155 145 10
2 178 170 8
3 165 160 5
4 170 167 3
5 188 184 4
6 190 188 2
7 196 194 2
8 191 189 2
9 198 196 2
10 195 195 0
11 200 197 2
12 198 197 1
13 201 201 0
14 197 196 1
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
56 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
1.6.10 CHART SHOWING DEFECTS IN PLASTIC MOULDS RECTIFIED AFTER SIX SIGMA
TRAINING
Interpretation: Why-Why analysis was conducted as a root cause analysis measure for cutting torch.
Remedial measure was planned in the form of training to the operators and in-charges. After implementation
of proper maintenance schedule and giving training to the operators and maintenance persons, data were
collected to estimate the improvement in quality in terms of rejection. The trend analysis of 14 days during
January 2016 has been plotted and presented in the above trend chart. It broadly highlights as accepted or
rejected. It is clear from the above analysis that rejection has almost negligible due to attaining the skill within
a very short time after the training.
1.6.11 TABLE SHOWING RESULTS OF THERMO FLASKS BEFORE AND AFTER THE SIX
SIGMA IMPLEMENTATION
Status Before
Implementation After Implementation Change
(Hrs) Times in Minutes Total Time % Total Time %
Value Adding 280 36.36 400 76.63 120
Non-Value Adding 490 63.64 122 23.37 368
Total 770 100 522 100
1.6.12 CHART SHOWING HISTOGRAM RESULTS OF THERMO FLASKS BEFORE AND AFTER
THE SIX SIGMA IMPLEMENTATION
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
57 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Interpretation: The histogram above is the resultant of Value Stream Analysis. The effectiveness of six
sigma implementation is clearly shown here. This chart visually shows the increase in value added hours and
decreases in non-value added hours post adoption of six sigma tools.
1.6.13 TABLE SHOWING THE DEFECTS OF INSULATED BOTTLES BEFORE AND AFTER SIX
SIGMA ADOPTION
Type of defects % of Defects Before
Implementation
% of Defects After
Implementation
Leaking 64.5 8.38
Miscellaneous 24.19 3.88
Dirty 11.31 2.44
1.6.14 CHART HISTOGRAM SHOWING THE DEFECTS OF INSULATED BOTTLES BEFORE
AND AFTER SIX SIGMA ADOPTION
Interpretation: The histogram above shows the comparison of results of defect rectification of leakage in
insulated bottles manufactured. The problem was shown using Pareto analysis and the occurred problems are
listed as leakage, miscellaneous and dirt accumulation in raw material mixing. This was successfully reduced
using six sigma analysis. The above chart clearly shows the reduction in defects considerably after
implementation of six sigma tools.
1.7 FINDINGS FROM THE STUDY
Excessive chips and non-uniform edges found on the products due to cutting torch fault
Sensing feeler most frequently do not maintain the recommended distance as per machine specification
because the machine was too dirty
Lengthy times taken for manufacturing Thermo Flasks due to more non-value added hours in production
There was a leakage found in most insulated bottles produced due to Leakage, Dirt & other reasons
Defects in plastic moulds made many rejections in goods due to the lack of knowledge among operator &
in-charges
There was an improvement in accepted rate of materials after root cause analysis of cutting torch
There was an increase in the speed of thermo flask production after value stream mapping
The results of defect rectification on Insulated Bottles before and after the Six Sigma Implementation
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
58 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
1.8 RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that design review is intended for all levels of product design activity (e.g., component,
subsystem and complete system programs) and supporting manufacturing engineering activity.
Requirements and targets have been allocated and cascaded to subsystems and components.
Six-Sigma contributes to team involvement but care must be taken on the selection of project leaders and
to adapt Six Sigma to the organization, both on the program implementation and as the program
progresses over time.
Situation appraisal to be made to identify concerns, set priorities, and plan the next steps.
Problem analysis should to precisely describe the problem, identify and evaluate the causes and confirm
the true cause.
Decision analysis to be made to clarify purpose, evaluates alternatives, and assesses the risks of each
option and to make a final decision.
Potential problem analysis is being identified for safety degradation that might be introduced by the
corrective action
Identify the likely causes of the problems, take preventive action and plan contingent action.
1.9 CONCLUSION
In the industrial world, Six Sigma is a business mentally for perfecting a system and all of its components. In
addition, this perfection is continuously strived for, in an attempt to ensure excellence as a priority within an
organization or corporation as a whole. This incorporates much more than process improvement on a
production level. This involves creating cost-effective processes throughout an organization and maintaining
their quality indefinitely. More importantly, Six Sigma is a means of increasing a corporations overall net
worth and profit margins by effectively, honestly, and thoroughly measuring all of the activities in the
corporation. This includes not all process improvements for the product or services, but also organizational
improvements among employees in all departments.
1.10 REFERENCES Aboelmaged, M.G. (2010), “Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research”,
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 268-317.
Ahmed, S., Manaf, N.H.A. and Islam, R. (2013), “Effects of Lean Six Sigma application in healthcare services: a
literature review”, Reviews on Environmental Health, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 189-194.
Alsmadi, M. and Khan, Z. (2010), “Lean sigma: the new wave of business excellence, literature review and a
framework”, Second International Conference on Engineering Systems Management and its Applications
(ICESMA), March 30 – April 1, pp. 1-8, E-ISBN :978-9948-427-14-8.
Andersson, R., Eriksson, H. and Torstensson, H. (2006), “Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and
lean”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 282-296
Antony, J. (2008), ““Reflective practice: can Six Sigma be effectively implemented in SMEs?”, International Journal
of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 57 No. 5,pp. 420-423.
Antony, J., Escamilla, J.L. and Caine, P. (2003), “Lean Sigma”, Manufacturing Engineer, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 40-42.
Antony, (2006) "Six sigma for service processes", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12 Issue 2, pp.234 -
248
Arther, F. and George, M. (2004), “Lean Six Sigma Leads Xerox”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 3 No. 4,
pp. 11-16.
Assarlind, M., Gremyr, I. and Backman, K. (2012), “Multi-faceted views on a Lean Six Sigma application”,
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 21-30.
Bhuiyan, N., Baghel, A. and Wilson, J. (2006), “A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an
aerospace company”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55 No. 8, pp. 671-
687.
Bossert, J.L. (2013), “Second chances”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 4-5.
Brassard, M., Finn L., Ginn, D. and Ritter D. (2002). The Six Sigma Memory Jogger II, A Pocket Guide of Tools for
Six Sigma Improvement Teams. New York: GOAL / QPC.
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
59 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Breyfogle, F.W.I. II (2008), “Beyond troubleshooting”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 27-31.
Chakravorty, S.S. and Shah, A.D. (2012), “Lean Six Sigma (LSS): an implementation experience”, European
Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 118-137.
Chen, M. and Lyu, J. (2009), “A Lean Six-Sigma approach to touch panel quality improvement”, Production
Planning & Control, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 445-454.
Chen, H., Lindeke, R. and Wyrick, D. (2010), “Lean automated manufacturing: avoiding the pitfalls to embrace the
opportunities”, Assembly Automation, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 117-123.
Chiarini, A. (2013a), “Relationships between total quality management and Six Sigma inside European
manufacturing companies: a dedicated survey”, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol.
11 No. 2, pp. 179-194.
Chiarini, A. (2013b), “Differences between Six Sigma applications in manufacturing and the service industry”,
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 345-360.
Corbett, L.M. (2011), “Lean Six Sigma: the contribution to business excellence”, International Journal of Lean Six
Sigma, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 118-131.
Drohomeretski, E., Gouvea da Costa, S., Pinheiro de Lima, E. and Andrea da Rosa, P. (2013), “Lean, Six Sigma and
Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 52
No. 3, pp. 804-824.
Franchetti, M. and Yanik, M. (2011), “Continuous improvement and value stream analysis through the Lean
DMAIC Six Sigma approach: a manufacturing case study from Ohio, USA”, International Journal of Six Sigma and
Competitive Advantage, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 278-300.
Hardeman, J. and Goethals, P.L. (2011), “A case study: applying Lean Six Sigma concept to design more efficient
airfoil extrusion shimming process”, International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 6 No. 3,
pp. 173-196
Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the
World's Top Corporations New York: Currency and Double Day of Random House Inc.
Harzing (2012), Journal Quality List, 47 Ed., available at: www.harzing.com/download/jql_journal. pdf/ (accessed
August 17, 2012).
Hilton, R.J. and Sohal, A. (2012), “A conceptual model for the successful deployment of Lean Six Sigma”,
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 54-70.
Hu, G., Wang, L., Fetch, S. and Bidanda, B. (2008), “A multi-objective model for project portfolio selection to
implement lean and Six Sigma concepts”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46 No. 23, pp. 6611-
6625.
Klefsjö, B., Wiklund, H. and Edgeman, R.L. (2001), “Six Sigma seen as a methodology for total quality
management”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 31-35.
Kumar, M., Antony, J., Singh, R.K., Tiwari, M.K. and Perry, D. (2006), “Implementing the Lean Six Sigma
framework in an Indian SME: a case study”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 407-423.
Laureani, A. and Antony, J. (2012), “Standards for Lean Six Sigma certification”, International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 110-120.
Pepper, M.P.J. and Spedding, T.A. (2010), “The evolution of Lean Six Sigma”, International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 138-155.
Pickrell, G., Lyons, J. and Shaver, J. (2005), “Lean Six Sigma implementation case studies”, International Journal of
Six Sigma and Competitive Advantages, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 369-379.
Prasanna, M. and Vinodh, S. (2013), “Lean Six Sigma in SMEs: an exploration through literature review”, Journal of
Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 224-250.
Salah, S., Rahim, A. and Carretero, J. (2010), “The integration of Six Sigma and Lean management”, International
Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 249-274.
Schroeder et al. (2008), “Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory”, Journal of Operations Management Vol. 26
pp.536 – 554.
Shah, R., Chandrasekaran, A. and Linderman, K. (2008), “In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of Lean
and Six Sigma”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46 No. 23, pp. 6679-6699.
Shahin, A. and Alinavaz, M. (2008), “Integrative approach and framework of Lean Six Sigma: a literature
perspective”, International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 323-337.
Smith, B. (2003), “Lean and Six Sigma – a one-two punch”, Quality Progress, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 37-41.
Snee, R.D. (2010), “Lean Six Sigma – getting better all the time”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 1
No. 1, pp. 9-29.
International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences
www.ijetmas.com September 2016, Volume 4, Issue 9, ISSN 2349-4476
60 Dr. N. Venkateswaran
Thomas, B.H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M. and Micucci, S. (2004), “A process for systematically reviewing the
literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions”, Worldviews on Evidence-Based
Nursing, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 176-184.
Timans, W., Antony, J., Ahaus, K. and Solingen, R. (2012), “Implementation of Lean Six Sigma in small and
medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in the Netherlands”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 63 No.
3, pp. 339-353.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), “Towards a methodology for developing evidence informed
management knowledge by means of systematic review”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 207-
222.
Vinodh, S., Gautham, S.G. and Ramiya, A. (2011), “Implementing lean sigma framework in an Indian automotive
valves manufacturing organisation: a case study”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 708-722.
Vinodh, S., Kumar, S.V. and Vimal, K.E.K. (2012), “Implementing Lean Sigma in an Indian rotary switches
manufacturing organisation”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 1-15.
Waite, P.J. (2013), “Save your steps”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 20-24.
Wang, M.-T., Wan, H.-D., Chen, H.-Y., Wang, S.-M.A., Huang, S.-C.A. and Cheng, H.-Y.L. (2012), “Six Sigma
and Lean Six Sigma: a literature review and experience in Taiwan”, Conference of International Foundation for
Production Research-Asia Pacific Region, Patong Beach, Phuket, December 2-5 2010.
William, H. and Willie, K. (2003), “The Honeywell experience”, ASQ Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 2 No. 2,
pp. 34-37.
Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (2003), Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Free
Press, New York, NY.
Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (2005), “Lean consumption”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 3, pp. 58-69.
Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson
Associates/Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY.
Yi, T.P., Feng, C.J., Prakash, J. and Ping, L.W. (2012), “Reducing electronic component losses in lean electronics
assembly with Six Sigma approach”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 206-230.
Zhang, Q., Irfan, M., Khattak, M.A.O., Zhu, X. and Hassan, M. (2012), “Lean Six Sigma: a literature review”,
Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 3 No. 10, pp. 599-605.