performance enablement at shc

19
Performance Enablement at SHC

Upload: chris-mason-phd

Post on 26-Jul-2015

55 views

Category:

Recruiting & HR


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Performance Enablement at SHC

March 2014

What inspired us to change Performance Management at SHC?

2

March 2014

2

3

We launched a new culture and leadership model at SHC

We needed a more agile approach for our business

1

We wanted to focus more on feedback and growth

4

We’ve learned some new things about the brain

4 reasons for change:

3

March 2014

What we set out to change.

Cumbersome & detailed annual goal setting process Goals that become outdated as business changes Annual reviews that occur well after the year is over Complicated process that created a lot of work A disconnect between reviews and daily work Significant time spend by managers & HR in calibration

4

March 2014

So where did you look for new ideas?

5

March 2014

March 20147

Especially these two…

March 2014

…and emerging trends we saw in the broader

market, such as…

8

March 2014

The pace of change is driving more agile work.

9

March 2014

Datafication is unlocking new value.

10

March 2014

Democratized data is emerging

everywhere.

11

March 2014

and social, and the crowd are on

the rise!

12

March 2014

So what did you ultimately create?

13

March 201414

A new approach to performance at SHC(for all salaried & exception hourly associates)

March 201415

We called the new approach…

March 2014

Quarterly Objective Setting

Continuous360 DegreeFeedback

Quarterly Performance

Check-Ins+ +16

It’s built around 3 new tools.

March 2014

Some Early Insights

17

Early evidence OKRs help

Hourly Inside Sales Team Corporate Salaried Population

Month 1 Pre-OKRs

Month 2 Start OKRs

Month 3 Post-OKRs

OKR Group

No-OKR Group No Change

8%Sales/Hr

2013 9-box

2014 9-box

11.5%Up 1-Level

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

3.5%Up 1-Level

Full OKR

GroupPartial OKR

GroupNo-OKR Group No Change

March 2014

Ask for it: Users were MORE likely to use SoundBoard when someone else requested feedback from them first.

Leadership matters: One of the strongest predictors of user ship in a business is how much the senior most leader use the tool.

Ask for it: Users were MORE likely to use SoundBoard when someone else requested feedback from them first.

Leadership matters: One of the strongest predictors of user ship in a business is how much the senior most leader use the tool.

SoundBoard preferred: The majority of users report they prefer SoundBoardfeedback to the traditional performance review.

It takes 10: Users with 10 or more pieces of feedback are much more likely to report they are comfortable using the tool.

SoundBoard preferred: The majority of users report they prefer SoundBoardfeedback to the traditional performance review.

It takes 10: Users with 10 or more pieces of feedback are much more likely to report they are comfortable using the tool.

Feedback leads to change: 75% of users of the tool report they have changed their behavior as a

direct result of feedback.

Feedback leads to change: 75% of users of the tool report they have changed their behavior as a

direct result of feedback.18

Early SoundBoard findings

10K 40K 214Active Users

Pieces ofFeedback

Days Since Launch

March 2014

Performance Enablement

19