performance characteristics of a pseudo-operational ensemble kalman filter april 2006, enkf...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Performance Characteristics of a Pseudo-operational Ensemble Kalman Filter
April 2006, EnKF Wildflower Meeting
Greg Hakim & Ryan TornUniversity of Washington
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~hakim
Outline
• Issues for limited-area EnKFs.– Boundary conditions.
– Nesting.
– [Multiscale prior covariance.]
• UW pseudo-operational system.– Performance characteristics.
– Analysis of Record (AOR) test.
• Experiments using the UW RT data.– Sensitivity & targeting.
– Observation impact & thinning.
Boundary Conditions
• Obvious choice: global ensemble, but…– Often ensembles too small.– Undesirable ensemble population techniques.– Different resolution, grids, etc.
• Flexible alternatives (Torn et al. 2006).– Mean + random draws from N(0,B).– Mean + scaled random draws from climatology.– “error boundary layer” shallow due to obs.
Nesting
• Grid 1: global ensemble BCs.– E.g. draws from N(0,B) or similar.
• Grid 2: ensemble BCs from grid 1.• One-way nesting: straightforward.
– Cycle on grid 1, then on grid 2.
• Two-way: many choices; little experience.– Note: Hxb different on grids 1 and 2. – Issues at grid boundaries.
12
The Multiscale Problem
• Sampling error– noise in obs est & prior covariance.
• Ad hoc remedies– “localization” – Confidence intervals.
• Multiscale problem.– Noise on smallest scales may dominate.– Need for scale-selective update?
Objectives of System
• Evaluate EnKF in a region of sparse in-situ observations and complex topography.
• Estimate analysis & forecast error.
• Sensitivity: targeting & thinning.
Model Specifics
• WRF Model, 45 km resolution, 33 vertical levels
• 90 ensemble members
• 6 hour analysis cycle
• ensemble forecasts to t+24 hrs at 00 and 12 UTC
• perturbed boundaries using fixed covariance perturbations from WRF 3D-VAR
Observations
Obs. Type Variables 00 UTC 06 UTC 12 UTC 18 UTC
Surface Altimeter 430 420 420 440
Rawindsonde u, v, T, RH 1000 0 1000 0
ACARS u, v, T 1650 1390 740 1860
Cloud Wind u, v 2030 1740 1670 1510
Total 5110 3550 3830 3810
Probabilistic Analyses
Large uncertainty associated with shortwave approaching in NW flow
sea-level pressure500 hPa height
Analysis of Record
Hourly surface analyses.EnKF covariances.Available t+30 minutes.15 km resolution.
Sensitivity Analysis
• Basic premise: – how do forecasts respond to changes in initial
& boundary conditions, & the model?
• Applications:– “targeted observations” & network design.– “targeted state estimation” (thinning).– basic dynamics research.
Adjoint approach
Given J, a scalar forecast metric, one can show that:
•Need to run an adjoint model backward in time.•Complex code & lots of approximations
•Does not account for state estimation or errors.
adjoint of resolvant
Ensemble Approach
• Adjoint sensitivity weighted by initial-time error covariance.
• Can evaluate rapidly without an adjoint model!
• Can show: this gives response in J, including state estimation.
With Brian Ancell (UW)
Sensitivity from the UW Real-time system
Case study removing one observation.Metric: average MSL pressure over western WA
Forecast Differences
• Assimilating the surface pressure observation at buoy 46036 leads to a stronger cyclone.
• Predicted Response: 0.63 hPa
• Actual Response: 0.60 hPa
Observation Impact
Adaptively sampling the obs datastream–Thin by assimilating only high-impact obs.
Summary
• BCs: flexibility & weak influence.• UW real-time system ~gov. center quality.
– Moisture field better than most.– Surface AOR ~10 km.
• Sensitivity analysis.– Ensemble targeting easy & flexible.– Adaptive DA (“thinning”).
AOR Opportunities
• “No propagate” update– nested high resolution single member.– assimilate using coarse-grid stats.– can be done “now.”
• Deterministic propagation– as above, but evolve high-res state.
• Full filter– evolve & assimilate entire ensemble.
• 4DVAR with EnKF statistics.– at least 3--5 years out.
AOR Challenges
• True multiscale conditions (<15 km).– Scale-dependent sampling errors?
• Bias estimation and removal.– EnKF allows state-dependent bias estimation.
• Model error estimation & removal.– Parameter estimation; model calibration.
• Satellite radiance assimilation.• Kalman smoothing.