performance appraisal seminar 2009
TRANSCRIPT
Performance Evaluation for Department Supervisors and
Mid-Level Managers The Executive Suite Warren J. Rutherford
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 2
Seminar Objectives Review the reasons to perform supervisory
evaluations, Identify evaluation prerequisites, Illustrate various evaluation models, Discuss training and communication
requirements, and Illustrate linking an evaluation to corporate
retention, advancement, and compensation systems.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 3
Performance Evaluation and Performance Appraisal Terms are often used interchangeably. Evaluation – to determine the significance
or worth of, usually by careful appraisal and study.
Appraisal – to evaluate the worth, significance, or status of.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 4
Evaluation Essentials Understand the reasons why performance
evaluations often fail, Learn how to perform an evaluation, Understand the elements to evaluation
(preparation, interview, rating, follow-up), Identify the evaluation cycle, and How to link performance to retention,
advancement, and compensation decisions.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 5
Seminar Expectations Participants will learn to:
Identify the precursors to performance evaluation (goal & objective setting, communication, objectivity, training, supervisory and staff support, clarity of mission, and realistic expectations), and
Procedures to regularly evaluate the performance evaluation program itself
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 6
Why Conduct Performance Evaluations Communication:
Provide information & feedback about supervisor job performance to the supervisor, evaluator, & executive.
Key to retaining supervisors. Increase and enhance communication between
evaluator and supervisor. Provide the evaluator & supervisor a means to
discuss the supervisor’s job duties & responsibilities along with work circumstances and the work environment.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 7
Why Conduct Performance Evaluations Measurement of performance:
Used to measure performance in relation to agreed goals.
Improve the supervisor’s job performance. Point out areas of acceptable and/or
outstanding work performance.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 8
Why Conduct Performance Evaluations Improvement and training needs:
Identify areas that need improvement. Determine training needs for work unit. Re-evaluate job duties & outline specific objectives and
the means to achieve them. Supervisor development:
Develop supervisors for higher levels and more responsible positions.
To determine the level of compensation adjustment, if applicable.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 9
Prerequisites to Effective Evaluation
Understand evaluator bias Bias is the inaccurate distortion of a measurement caused
when evaluator fails to remain emotionally detached while supervisor performance is evaluated.
Common Biases: Central tendency – Giving everyone the same average rating or
avoiding extremes. Leniency – Avoiding low ratings to avoid conflict or create a bad
reflection on the evaluator. Halo effect – High or low rating in one area influencing the whole
rating. Recency – Focusing on most recent examples rather than across
entire rating period.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 10
Prerequisites to Effective Evaluation Understand evaluator bias
Common Biases: Constancy – Rank ordering supervisors rather than
measuring their performance. Personal prejudice – Evaluator’s dislike for a certain group or
class of people (race, age, culture, sex, appearance) may distort the ratings those people receive.
Length of service – Giving higher ratings to those with greatest length of service.
Previous ratings influence – Repeating the last rating instead of looking at the actual performance during the rating period.
Personal relationship conflict – Letting a personal relationship with the supervisor influence the appraisal.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 11
Prerequisites to Effective Evaluation Observing and documenting supervisor
performance: Purpose – To record and communicate a supervisor’s work
performance during the rating period. Be accurate – use as a memory jogger Document facts, not opinions – open-minded, objective Don’t rely on memory – write down, use standard form Be consistent – Observe, document, communicate to all
supervisors Communicate and document positive and negative supervisor
performance Documentation should describe supervisor behavior not his/her
attitude – Be specific, point out specific performance incidents.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 12
Prerequisites to Effective Evaluation Provide Feedback
Guidelines Communicate to supervisor at the time something positive or
negative occurs. Make sure supervisor understands the feedback, explain carefully. Show respect for the supervisor. Listen carefully to the supervisor’s explanation. Show you understand the supervisor’s point of view. Make sure the feedback is accurate.
Conduct meetings during the year (quarterly) to review progress and provide feedback; both evaluator and supervisor should document.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 13
Performance Evaluation Models Formal appraisal 360° Self – Appraisal Competency-based appraisal Team/Work Unit appraisal Combinations of the above Linkages to merit pay, wage adjustments,
compensation matrices, bonus, incentive pay, or innovation pay
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 14
Performance Evaluation – Formal Appraisal Process Supervisor evaluated at established intervals
(2x year). Evaluator is a superior to supervisor. Common to all models:
Rating-based across different categories. Each category may be point-scored and/or
weighted. Final result is numerical, tied to performance grid.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 15
Performance Evaluation – 360° Appraisal Program Supervisor performs self-evaluation AND is also
evaluated by subordinate(s) and superior(s). May/may not be anonymous. Emphasis on teamwork to overcome wounded
egos. Supervisor critically reviews evaluation
comments, prepares performance improvement plan, discusses confidentially with superior(s).
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 16
Performance Evaluation – Self Appraisal Process Supervisor completes self-appraisal form
requesting honest, objective assessment of performance during performance period.
Utilized most frequently as part of a formal, 360°, or team-based appraisal.
Enables supervisor to reflect on performance. Enables superior to understand the supervisor’s
point of reference.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 17
Performance Evaluation – Team/Work Unit appraisal Work Unit (department, division, section, team)
evaluates performance for period under review. Each member of work unit completes appraisal
form that links to unit goals, objectives, strategies for performance period.
Unit performance results shared equally with all employees in unit.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 18
Performance Evaluation – Competency-based Rewards superior performance that is linked to
organizational goals. Competencies for individual jobs tied to performance
measures. Usually limited to supervisory, management, and
professional group. Focus on better performance & career development. Reliance on job description to develop competencies for
development.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 19
Commonly Shared Evaluation Categories Goals, Objectives Primary Duties Training/Support Needs Quality of Work Volume of Work Knowledge of Job, of
Field Work Effort/Initiative Working Relationships
Following Policies & Procedures
Cooperation & Communication
Dependability Customer Service Safety Planning & Organizing Decision Making Leadership
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 20
Competency Based Sample Categories
Establish focus Provide motivational support Foster teamwork Attention to communication Oral, written, & persuasive
communication Customer, entrepreneurial, & results
orientation Initiative Fostering innovation Building collaborative relationships Empowering, developing, & influencing
others
Diagnostic information gathering Analytical, forward, conceptual,
& strategic thinking Thoroughness Decisiveness Self-confidence Stress management Technical expertise Interpersonal awareness Managing performance Managing change Personal credibility
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 21
Rating Categories Qualitative – Numberless
rating system Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectations
Quantitative – Numbered rating system 4 – Outstanding 3 – Above Average 2 – Good 1 – Below Average 0 – Very Poor Can be weighted for
different categories Can be prioritized for
different categories
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 22
Purpose of Performance Evaluation
Enable joint planning and communication between an supervisor and evaluator on what the supervisor is expected to accomplish during the performance period.
Ensure that a supervisor’s performance is evaluated in terms of measurable results as well as how these results are achieved.
Establish clear and explicit performance goals and meaningful feedback, jointly established by the supervisor and evaluator, that are objective indicators of whether performance objectives are met, in order to maximize performance and customer service.
Facilitate ongoing, year-round communication concerning what the supervisor is expected to accomplish, how well s/he is meeting these performance objectives, and what steps need to be taken by both parties to ensure that the objectives are met.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 23
Purpose of Performance Evaluation Identify a plan to promote the supervisor ’s professional
development that can include educational and training opportunities.
Identify corrective action that needs to be taken by the supervisor and evaluator in those instances where a supervisor has not accomplished a performance objective.
Identify the consequences when a supervisor has not accomplished a performance objective.
Establish a reliable and rational basis for determining pay based upon performance.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 24
Training Requirements Supervisor and evaluator need to be “on the
same page.” Understand purpose of appraisal process. Understand roles & responsibilities of participants in the
appraisal process. Understand need to schedule sufficient time to fulfill the
process effectively. Practice (role-play) the steps in the process in group
setting, receive clarification on intent, raise and resolve “what-if” scenarios.
Understand need for objectivity.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 25
The Evaluation Cycle
Performance Management CycleJ uly
August/ September
December/ J anuaryMarch-May
May/ J une
•Current fiscal year budget approved•Structure/ merit increases awarded
I ndividual goal settingand planning forcurrent fiscal year
Formal interim reviewAnnual evaluations
Merit recommendationsand supporting reviews due to HR
Ongoing Coachingand Feedback
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 26
The Elements to Evaluation
Pre-performance planning meeting Coaching Appraisal preparation Performance appraisal meeting Signatures and approvals Planning for the next performance planning meeting Reappraisal period for a “below expectations” appraisal
result Compensation decision
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 27
Evaluation Components Pre-performance Planning
Meeting Review expectations for
performance period Discuss/reach agreement on
expectations/standards for: Major position duties Major position objectives Competencies Action plans for further
professional development
Coaching Meet periodically during
performance period to discuss:
Actual compared to planned performance expectations
Review and/or make changes necessary to performance plan
Both parties take notes of coaching sessions
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 28
Evaluation Components Appraisal
Preparation Evaluator – Assess on
preliminary basis: Major position duties – rating and
comment Major position objectives – date
completed, rating and comments Competencies – rating and
comments Comments regarding supervisor’s
performance during the year Overall rating Action plans for further professional
development – results achieved
Supervisor The supervisor should, using the
original documents as adjusted during coaching session(s), conduct a self-appraisal of his/her own performance during the performance period.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 29
Evaluation Components
Performance Appraisal Meeting The evaluator and the supervisor
should meet privately to discuss his/her performance using the evaluator’s preliminary evaluation and the supervisor ’s self-appraisal as a basis for the discussion. As a result of this discussion, the evaluator arrives at and documents the final appraisal on the Performance Planning and Appraisal Document.
Signatures & Approvals Evaluator signs and dates completed
form, noting any additional comments.
Supervisor signs and dates the form, has the opportunity to make comments.
The supervisor ’s signature confirms that he/she has discussed its contents with the evaluator and does not necessarily imply concurrence with all of the content of the appraisal.
The form is then referred to the next level of supervision (if any) for signature.
The form is finally placed on file in the supervisor ’s official record.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 30
Evaluation Components Planning for the next
performance planning meeting After the process is
completed for the current performance period, the evaluator and supervisor should immediately schedule the planning meeting for the next performance period.
Reappraisal period for a “below expectations” appraisal result Reappraise within 90 days. Provide to superiors a
specific, measurable, and objective corrective action program
Seek to bring appraisal to at least “Meet Expectations” level.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 31
Linking Results to… Employment decisions
Promotion, retention, probation, suspension, termination
Performance-based pay Increase, no adjustment, decrease
Organizational performance
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 32
Employment Decisions Promotion – Results assist
in qualification review for promotional opportunities
Retention – Results assist in retention decisions
Probation – Less than satisfactory results could place supervisor on limited probationary status with objective to change performance level to meets expectation level.
Suspension – Continued performance at a less than satisfactory results could place supervisor on suspension status with objective to change performance level to meets expectation level upon return.
Termination - Continued performance at a less than satisfactory results could cause the supervisor to be terminated from employment.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 33
Performance-based Pay Merit pay increase (step-based) –
Usually provided for where a pay range (minimum/maximum) also has intermediary steps.
Average or better rating enables advancement in grade to next step level (preestablished %-age).
May or may not provide %-age adjustment for those at top of grade range (may also be a lump-sum payment).
Usually accompanied by annual wage adjustment (COLA). Below average rating may not receive merit adjustment and/or
annual wage adjustment until performance becomes average. Below average rating may cause step reduction after reappraisal
period if performance still below average.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 34
Performance-based Pay Merit pay increase (percent-based) –
Usually provided for where a pay range is characterized by a minimum – maximum with no intermediary steps.
Usually not accompanied by annual wage adjustment (COLA). Percent increase based on overall performance rating. Percent increase can also be based on supervisor’s present placement in
the pay range (higher in range, less %-age merit). May or may not provide %-age adjustment for those at top of grade range
(may also be a lump-sum payment). Below average rating may not receive merit adjustment and/or annual
wage adjustment until performance becomes average. Below average rating may cause step reduction after reappraisal period if
performance still below average.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 35
Organizational Performance Gain – Sharing pay
Requires specific and measurable workplan objectives (targets) on organizational and department basis that are tied to core values and workplans.
Usually, no more than 50% of funds saved are awarded as gain-sharing pay, other 50% savings eliminated from budgetary process (returned to taxpayers).
Self-funded, no additional funds. Pay incentive provided to team/work unit where innovation,
exemplary results accomplished in unit goals/objectives, or workplan. Results from savings achieved from innovation – unit members share
equally in savings.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 36
Precursors to Evaluation Goal & objective setting – Specific, measurable, &
attainable. Communication…….both ways Objectivity………by both parties Training………with both parties present Supervisory and staff support – Equip the process with
the tools necessary to make it successful. Clarity of mission – Mutual understanding and
agreement Realistic expectations – Challenging but possible.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 37
Why Evaluations Often Fail There is no face-to-face discussion. There is no preparation by either party. Evaluators do not really know what “performance” is or how
it should be appraised. Evaluators don’t know how to measure and/or rate
performance. Appraisal forms are too complicated and/or not understood. There is little identification of actual performance problems. There has been little communication about performance
during the period being appraised.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 38
Why Evaluations Often Fail Evaluators’ ratings have been biased. There has been no relationship between the objectives set
and the appraisal form. Evaluators have been concerned only with bad performance. There has been no follow-up effort afterwards. Appraisal has just been a once-a-year event, not an ongoing
process. There is no linkage to compensation or other rewards-based
program.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 39
Evaluating the Appraisal Program Need to assess effectiveness before it can be improved. Build evaluation of the program into the program. Evaluate new program after it has been implemented in
the first year, and every year thereafter. Design the evaluation process to be useful. Evaluate from 2 perspectives:
Are we doing things right? (i.e., are the process and rules being followed?)
Are we doing the right things? (i.e., what effect does the program have?)
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 40
Evaluating the Evaluation Program – Compliance Were appraisals done on time? Did everyone who was supposed to receive an appraisal
get one? Were supervisory performance plans issued timely? Were progress reviews conducted? Does senior management devote appropriate resources
and give priority to the effective maintenance and operation of the performance appraisal program?
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 41
Evaluating the Evaluation Program –Effect Are the stated objectives of the appraisal program being met? Are supervisors and evaluators satisfied with the equity, utility,
accuracy, etc. of the program? Do the benefits of the program outweigh the costs? Has there been an improvement in supervisor, unit, or
organizational performance? Has the attitude or the behavior of supervisors and/or evaluators
changed as desired? Are there signs of different treatment in the results of the
performance appraisal processes? Has there been an improvement in the efficiency or the
effectiveness of related human resource programs?
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 42
Evaluating the Evaluation Program – Checklist Is it possible to gather information about the question raised? If not,
don’t bother trying to answer. Is there only one possible answer to the question? Answer should
not be predetermined or loaded by the phrasing of the question. Do decision-makers feel they need the information? If no one will use
the results, don’t gather the data. Do decision-makers want the answers to the question for
themselves? Evaluation results are more useful when the information is desired.
Can decision-makers indicate how they would use the answer to the question? Knowing in advance how the evaluation information will be used increases the chance that the evaluation results will be utilized.
The Executive Suite 2010-copyright 43
For more information, contact:Warren J. RutherfordThe Executive Suite129 Airport RoadHyannis, MA 02601508-778-7700508-771-1119 [email protected]