performance appraisal ch 10

Upload: surender-singh

Post on 10-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    1/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 1

    Performance Appraisal

    Chapter- 10

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    2/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 2

    Definition

    Performance appraisal can be defined

    as the process of evaluating theperformance of an employee andcommunicating the results of theevaluation to him for the purpose of

    rewarding or developing the employees.

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    3/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 3

    Objectives

    Setting targets and goals as

    performance standards Evaluating employee performance

    Identifying training and development

    needs Rewarding performance

    Improving performance

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    4/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 4

    The process

    Determination of standards or

    performance based on theorganizational objectives and the jobdescription.

    Measurement of performance againstthe pre-determined goals andstandards.

    Matching the performance with the

    standards

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    5/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 5

    The appraisers

    Self appraisal

    Supervisors Peers

    Customers

    Subordinates

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    6/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 6

    Performance Appraisals

    Method

    Traditional method

    Modern Method

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    7/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 7

    Traditional Method Management by Objective

    Graphic Rating Scale Work standards approach

    Essay appraisal

    Critical incident method

    Forced choice rating method

    Ranking method

    Checklist

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    8/28

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    9/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 9

    Critical Incident methodEx: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident

    Workers reaction scale

    A informed the supervisor immediately 5

    B Become anxious on loss of output 4

    C tried to repair the machine 3

    D Complained for poor maintenance 2

    E was happy to forced test 1

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    10/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 10

    Checklist method

    Simple checklist method

    Weighted checklist method

    Forced choice method

    Simple checklist method:Is employee regular Y/N

    Is employee respected by subordinate Y/NIs employee helpful Y/N

    Does he follow instruction Y/N

    Does he keep the equipment in order Y/N

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    11/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 11

    Weighted checklistmethod

    weights performance rating

    (scale 1 to 5 )

    Regularity 0.5

    Loyalty 1.5

    Willing to help 1.5

    Quality of work 1.5

    Relationship 2.0

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    12/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 12

    Forced choicemethod

    Criteria Rating

    1.Regularity on the job Most Least

    Always regular

    Inform in advance for delay

    Never regular

    Remain absentNeither regular nor irregular

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    13/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 13

    Graphic Rating Scale Continuous Rating Scale

    Discontinuous Rating Scale

    Employee name_________ Deptt_______

    Raters name ___________ Date________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exc. Good Acceptable Fair Poor

    5 4 3 2 1 _

    Dependability

    InitiativeOverall output

    Attendance

    Attitude

    Cooperation

    Total score Continuous Rating Scale

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    14/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 14

    Discontinuous Rating Scale

    Attitude

    No

    Interest

    Indifferent

    Interested

    Enthusiastic

    Very

    enthusiastic

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    15/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 15

    BARS( behaviorally Anchored

    rating scale)

    BARS are said to be behaviorallyanchored as the scales represent arange of descriptive statements of behavior varying from the least to themost effective.

    A rater is expected to indicate whichbehavior on each scale best descries anemployees performance.

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    16/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 16

    MBO Process

    Set organizational goals

    Defining performance target Performance review

    feedback

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    17/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 17

    Group Appraisal

    Ranking Paired comparison

    Forced distribution

    Performance tests Field reviewtechnique

    Performance Appraisal

    Methods

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    18/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 18

    Ranking method

    Employee Rank

    A 2

    B 1

    C 3

    D 5

    E 4

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    19/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 19

    Paired comparisonmethod

    A B C D E Final Rank

    A - - - + + 3

    B + - - + + 2

    C + + - + + 1

    D - - - - + 4

    E - - - - - 5

    No of Positive evaluation

    Total no. of evaluation * 100 = employee superior evaluation

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    20/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 20

    Forced Distribution method

    10% 20% 40% 20% 10%

    poor Below

    average

    average good Excellent

    No.

    of

    employees

    Force distribution curve

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    21/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 21

    Field review methodPerformance subordinate peers superior customer

    Dimension

    Leadership ^ ^

    Communication ^ ^

    Interpersonal skills ^ ^

    Decision making ^ ^ ^

    Technical skills ^ ^ ^

    Motivation ^ ^ ^

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    22/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 22

    Balance ScorecardThe two basic features of the balanced

    scorecard are:

    A balanced set of measures based on. thefour perspectives of balanced scorecard

    Linking the measures to EmployeePerformance

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    23/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 23

    The four Perspectives recommended by Kaplan and Norton

    for the managers to collect information are:

    The financial measures The financial measures includethe results like profits, increase in the market share,return on investments and other economic measures as

    a result of the actions taken. The customers measures - These measures help to geton customer satisfaction, the customers perspectiveabout the organization, customer loyalty, acquiring newcustomers. The data can be collected from the frequencyand number of customer complaints, the time taken to

    deliver the products and services, improvement inquality etc.

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    24/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 24

    The internal business measures These are the measuresrelated to the organizations internal processes which help toachieve the customer satisfaction. It includes the infrastructure,

    the long term and short term goals and objectives,organizational processes and procedures, systems and thehuman resources.

    The innovation and learning perspective. The innovation andlearning measures cover the organization's ability to learn,

    innovate and improve. They can be judged by employee skillsmatrix, key competencies, value added and the revenue peremployee.

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    25/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 25

    360 degree feedback

    The 360 degree technique is

    understood as systematic collection ofperformance data on an individual orgroup, derived from a number of stakeholder- the stakeholder being the

    immediate supervisor, team members,customer, peers, and self.

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    26/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 26

    Common Rating Errors Halo Effect

    A person outstanding in one area tends to

    receive outstanding or better than averageratings in other areas as well, even whensuch a rating is undeserved

    Negative Effect

    A low rating in one area yields lower thandeserved ratings for other accomplishments Central Tendency

    Assigning an average rating for all qualities

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    27/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 27

    Confrontation Avoidance

    Discomfort with giving negative feedback

    Initial Performance

    Rating an employee based solely on initialimpressions of performance

    RecencyRating an employee based solely on mostrecent performance which overshadows theentire years performance

  • 8/8/2019 Performance Appraisal Ch 10

    28/28

    09/04/09 Sugandha Agarwal 28