Performance and ProgressPerformance and Progress2005/20062005/2006

IntroductionIntroduction

Data collected during Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.2005/2006 fiscal year.

Who did our programs Who did our programs serve?serve?

Did programs reach the Did programs reach the intended populations?intended populations?

Did programs meet Did programs meet service goals?service goals?

Did children and Did children and families meet outcome families meet outcome goals?goals?

Lessons learned.Lessons learned.

Service DataService Data Children’s Investment Fund programs served 12,179 Children’s Investment Fund programs served 12,179

children and 3,124 parents/caregivers during the last fiscal children and 3,124 parents/caregivers during the last fiscal year.year.

Programs exceeded service goals and served 13% more Programs exceeded service goals and served 13% more children than projected.children than projected.

C h i l d r e n S e r v e d b y P r o g r a m A r e aF Y 0 5 - 0 6 ( n = 1 2 , 1 7 9 )

C h i l d A b u s e

P r e v e n t i o n &

In te r v e n t i o n1 2 %

E a r l y C h i l d h o o d

2 7 %

A ft e r S c h o o l & M e n t o r i n g

6 1 %

Who Did We Serve? Who Did We Serve? Gender and Age GroupGender and Age Group

Programs served roughly the same number of Programs served roughly the same number of boys and girls.boys and girls.

School aged children (age 9-15) make up the School aged children (age 9-15) make up the majority served (51%).majority served (51%).

A g e s o f C h i l d r e n S e r v e d F Y 0 5 - 0 6 ( n = 1 2 , 1 7 9 )

1 3 %

1 5 %

1 0 %

3 4 %

1 8 %

8 % 2 %0 - 2

3 - 5

6 - 8

9 - 1 2

1 3 - 1 5

1 6 - 1 8

N o t G iv e n

Who Did We Serve?Who Did We Serve?Race/Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity

R a c e / E t h n i c i t y o f C h i l d r e n S e r v e d F Y 0 5 - 0 6 ( n - 1 2 , 1 7 9 )

O th e r

2 %

T w o o r M o r e

R a c e s5 %

A s i a n

4 %

N a t i v e

H a w a i i a n , P a c i f i c

I s l a n d e r0 %

N a t i v e

A m e r i c a n , A l a s k a N a t i v e

5 %

L a t i n o

2 7 %

N o t G i v e n

8 %

W h i te

2 7 %

A fr i c a n

A m e r i c a n a n d A f r i c a n

Im m i g r a n t2 2 %

Who Did We Serve?Who Did We Serve?Primary LanguagePrimary Language

P r i m a r y L a n g u a g e S p o k e n i n H o m e o f C h i l d r e n S e r v e d

F Y 0 5 - 0 6 ( n = 1 2 , 1 7 9 )

E n g l i s h5 5 %

S p a n i s h 2 3 %

O t h e r6 %

N o t G i ve n1 6 %

Who Did We Serve?Who Did We Serve?Poverty LevelPoverty Level

S o c io e c o n o m ic S t a t u s o f C h i ld r e n S e r v e dF Y 0 5 - 0 6 ( n - 1 2 ,1 7 9 )

N o t G i v e n

3 7 %

O v e r 1 8 5 %

1 2 %

0 - 1 8 5 %

o f F P L , i n c l u d e s

F r e e & R e d u c e d

L u n c h2 9 %

A t o r B e l o w

F e d e r a l P o v e r ty L e v e l2 2 %

F e d e r a l P o v e r t y L e v e l = A t o r b e lo w $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 a n n u a l in c o m e f o r a f a m ily o f f o u r .

F r e e & R e d u c e d L u n c h = A n n u a l in c o m e a t t h e F e d e r a l P o v e r t y L e v e l a n d u p t o 1 8 5 % o f F P L o r $ 3 7 , 0 0 0 f o r a f a m ily o f f o u r .

Outcome Data Outcome Data

Outcome Goal Outcome Goal Areas: Early Areas: Early Childhood and Childhood and Child AbuseChild Abuse – Child developmentChild development– Child healthChild health– Parenting/family Parenting/family

functioningfunctioning– Child stability and Child stability and

welfarewelfare

Outcome Goal Outcome Goal Areas: After-Areas: After-School and School and MentoringMentoring

– School attendanceSchool attendance– School behaviorSchool behavior– Academic Academic

achievementachievement– Developmental Developmental

assetsassets

Outcome Data LimitationsOutcome Data Limitations The data we are reporting are descriptive, The data we are reporting are descriptive,

not causative.not causative. Many data points provide information on Many data points provide information on

progress made while children are enrolled.progress made while children are enrolled. Percentages reported apply Percentages reported apply onlyonly to the to the

portion of programs tracking the outcome portion of programs tracking the outcome and those clients who met a participation and those clients who met a participation threshold.threshold.

64% the children served met participation 64% the children served met participation thresholds set by grantees for outcome thresholds set by grantees for outcome tracking.tracking.

Early Childhood and Child Abuse Early Childhood and Child Abuse Program DataProgram Data

Grantees needed technical assistance Grantees needed technical assistance in data collection and reporting.in data collection and reporting.

Gathering Data: Technical Assistance Gathering Data: Technical Assistance Project with Portland State University.Project with Portland State University.

Child DevelopmentChild Development

80% of children screened met 80% of children screened met developmental milestones.developmental milestones.

20% who were not on track made 20% who were not on track made progress on meeting milestones progress on meeting milestones while enrolled. 78% of these children while enrolled. 78% of these children were referred to additional services.were referred to additional services.

Children screened showed the most Children screened showed the most risk in language/ communication risk in language/ communication development.development.

Child HealthChild Health

86% of children screened for current 86% of children screened for current immunizations were up to date.immunizations were up to date.

84% of children were screened for health 84% of children were screened for health and wellness needs.and wellness needs.

Parenting and Family FunctioningParenting and Family Functioning

85% of parents increased social supports.85% of parents increased social supports. 83% of parents increased appropriate 83% of parents increased appropriate

parenting practices.parenting practices. 77% of parents increased knowledge of 77% of parents increased knowledge of

ways to manage child behavior.ways to manage child behavior. 93% of parents increased knowledge of 93% of parents increased knowledge of

child development.child development. 79% of parents increased appropriate 79% of parents increased appropriate

parent-child interactions.parent-child interactions.

Child Stability and WelfareChild Stability and Welfare

99% of children attending child care 99% of children attending child care centers or preschools with access to centers or preschools with access to mental health counselors were not mental health counselors were not removed from care due to behavioral removed from care due to behavioral problems.problems.

97% of families who were referred to the 97% of families who were referred to the child abuse hotline for suspected abuse or child abuse hotline for suspected abuse or neglect were not re-reported within 90 neglect were not re-reported within 90 days of completing services.days of completing services.

91% of children experienced an increase 91% of children experienced an increase in stability.in stability.

After-School and Mentoring After-School and Mentoring Program DataProgram Data

82% of identified program participants 82% of identified program participants attended Portland Public Schools.attended Portland Public Schools.

PPS, David Douglas, Reynolds and PPS, David Douglas, Reynolds and Centennial School Districts all provided Centennial School Districts all provided data on academic achievement variables.data on academic achievement variables.

PPS also provided data on attendance, PPS also provided data on attendance, behavior variables, and progress on behavior variables, and progress on grades.grades.

School AttendanceSchool Attendance(PPS Only)(PPS Only)

49% of program participants 49% of program participants improved school attendance in the improved school attendance in the 2005/2006 school year.2005/2006 school year.

74% of program participants 74% of program participants attended 90% of school days.attended 90% of school days.

School BehaviorSchool Behavior(PPS Only)(PPS Only)

79% of program participants 79% of program participants decreased behavior referralsdecreased behavior referrals

64% of program participants 64% of program participants decreased serious behavior referrals decreased serious behavior referrals (those that resulted in a suspension (those that resulted in a suspension or expulsion)or expulsion)

Academic Achievement:Academic Achievement:GradesGrades

(PPS Only)(PPS Only)

33% improved reading/English grades33% improved reading/English grades

31% improved math grades31% improved math grades

Academic Achievement:Academic Achievement:Percentage of Students Meeting Percentage of Students Meeting

State Standards in State Standards in Reading and MathReading and Math

(All Districts Reporting)(All Districts Reporting)

SubjectSubject 2004/052004/05 2005/062005/06

Reading/Reading/

EnglishEnglish74.9%74.9% 77.8%77.8%

MathMath 72.8%72.8% 75.3%75.3%

Academic Achievement: Academic Achievement: Percentage of Students Moving to Percentage of Students Moving to a Higher Performance Categorya Higher Performance Category

(All Districts Reporting)(All Districts Reporting)

34% of program participants moved to a 34% of program participants moved to a higher performance category in reading or higher performance category in reading or stayed at “exceeds.”stayed at “exceeds.”

38% of program participants moved to a 38% of program participants moved to a higher performance category in math or higher performance category in math or stayed at “exceeds.”stayed at “exceeds.”

Academic Achievement: Academic Achievement: Progress toward Meeting Progress toward Meeting

State Standards State Standards(PPS Only)(PPS Only)

Of the students who were Of the students who were notnot meeting meeting state standards in reading, 52% moved state standards in reading, 52% moved to a higher performance category.to a higher performance category.

Of the students who were Of the students who were notnot meeting meeting state standards in math, 53% moved to state standards in math, 53% moved to a higher performance category.a higher performance category.

Outcome Data AnalysisOutcome Data Analysis

First year of data collection for many First year of data collection for many grantees.grantees.

First year results will assist grantees in First year results will assist grantees in making future outcome projections for making future outcome projections for their program participants.their program participants.

Technical assistance necessary when Technical assistance necessary when grantees must gather, analyze and grantees must gather, analyze and report data.report data.

Need for strategies to increase level of Need for strategies to increase level of participation in programs.participation in programs.

Considerations for the FutureConsiderations for the Future

Need for common intermediate outcomes Need for common intermediate outcomes for after-school and mentoring programs.for after-school and mentoring programs.

CHIF would need to provide technical CHIF would need to provide technical assistance to help after-school and assistance to help after-school and mentoring programs to collect, analyze mentoring programs to collect, analyze and report data on intermediate and report data on intermediate outcomes.outcomes.

SUN system task force is considering SUN system task force is considering joint evaluation strategies.joint evaluation strategies.