performance and career management process ocfo monthly managers meeting may 21, 2012; june 4, 2012...
TRANSCRIPT
Performance and Career Management Process
OCFO Monthly Managers Meeting
May 21, 2012; June 4, 2012
Neli Lopez
AGENDA
• 2011 PMP Survey Results• Discussion• Action Plans
• 2012 PMP Process• Annual Review Form & Self-Assessment• Competencies• Schedule• Training• Resources
04/19/23 2
2011 PMP Survey: Who Participated
04/19/23 3
Lab-wide OCFO
Number of respondents
609 72
Number of written comments
375 44
OCFO Distribution of respondents was very diverse:- Years of Service- Supervisor vs. non-supervisor
PMP Process Communication
04/19/23 4
Top Narrative Themes•Need for clearer instructions on PMP process within Division•Need for timeliness and a clear schedule
Question Lab-Wide
OCFO
Received good to excellent communication on Lab and/or Division strategic goals
50% 60%
PMP Process Communication
• Action Plan• Publish and adhere to PMP Calendar• Rollout PMP process at Department
Management Team Meetings and/or Department Staff Meetings• Department Heads invite HR to meetings in
month of June
04/19/23 5
Employee/Supervisor Conversations
04/19/23 6
Top Themes • Employees heard from their managers that they did not value the
PMP process• Improvement needed in regular performance feedback• Improvement needed in development feedback
Question Lab-Wide OCFO
Good to excellent annual conversations 57% 69%
Regular performance feedback 57% 29%
Regular development feedback 47% 11%
Employee/Supervisor Conversations
04/19/23 7
• Action Plan• OCFO Supervisors and Managers will initiate performance
conversations during regular one-on-one meetings• OCFO supervisors and managers will initiate career
development conversations, at least annually• BLI Annual Conversation Workshop for Supervisors required
– to be held in Emeryville• BLI Annual Conversation Workshop for Employees optional –
to be held in Emeryville• OCFO to develop Career Development training for
supervisors
Additional Conversation Resources
04/19/23 8
BLI Discussion Tool• Performance Conversation Resource Guide
BLI Workshops• Performance Review Discussion Workshops for
Supervisors & Employees• Leading for Results Workshop • Supervisor Scenario Workshop• Understanding Differences Workshops• Career Development Workshops for Employees
Additional Conversation Resources
04/19/23 9
On BLI Website:• Online Learning
• Giving and Receiving Performance Feedback, by Peter R. Garber• Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical
Guidelines, by Michael Armstrong• Coaching for Peak Employee Performance, by Bill Foster and
Karen Seeker
• Assessment Tools• Team Role Assessment• Creative Problem Solving Assessment• Organization Skills Assessment
2012 OCFO PMP Calendar
04/19/23 10
Date Action
5/18 Kickoff Announcement Email from CFO
6/4 Rollout Details Email from HR Center
6/5 – 6/15 Rollout by HR during staff meetings
6/22 Self Assessments (combined form) Due
7/31 Annual Reviews (combined form) Due in eRoom
First week of August
High/Low Performer Comparator Discussion
8/10 – 8/31 Reviews and Employee Discussions Finalized
9/1 Signed Reviews Returned to HR Center
New this year• Department Heads responsible for quality of performance reviews• HR will only review low performers
• PMP – Needs Improvement• PRD – Acceptable rating or below
NOTE: This calendar subject to change
2012 OCFO PMP Training Calendar
04/19/23 11
Date Action
5/21, 6/4 HR Rollout to Managers & Supervisors
6/7, 6/11, 6/13, 6/14
Self-Assessment Workshops - Emeryville
6/12 Self-Assessment Workshop - Berkeley
6/27, 6/28 Annual Review Summary Workshops – new supervisors/refresher - Emeryville
6/29 Annual Review Summary Workshops – new supervisors/refresher - Berkeley
7/19 BLI Performance Review Discussion Workshops for Supv’s and Employees - Emeryville
7/17, 8/2, 8/14 BLI Performance Review Discussion Workshop for Supervisors - Berkeley
7/18, 7/31, 8/16 BLI Performance Review Discussion Workshop for Employees - Berkeley
New this year• BLI Performance Review Discussion Workshop – required for all supervisors
Required Elements• Performance expectations and goals that align with Lab/Division/group goals• Employee Self Assessment• Annual Performance Review – written and conversation• 100% completion rate of Annual Performance Reviews (DOE/UC requirement)
Discretionary Elements
04/19/23 12
2012 PMP Process
Division • Two versions of Annual Review Form to choose from:
– 5-level performance rating scale or
– No rating with Needs Improvement box – OCFO will use
• Division and/or position competencies – OCFO will use
Supervisor
• Employee peer and/or subordinate feedback
• Career development conversation – OCFO will do
Employee • Career development conversation
2012 PMP Process
• PMP Annual Review Summary & Self-Assessment Forms• New Combined PMP Form – see handout• Guidance Sheet - separate document
• Competencies• Rating scale • Imbed into Combined PMP Form
04/19/23 13
2012 PMP Process
• Where to find Forms, Guidance, and Calendar• OCFO Website, Human
Resources in the OCFO, Performance Management
• Forms and Calendar will also be attached to rollout email from HR
04/19/23 14
2012 PMP Process
• Combined Self-Assessment and Annual Summary Form• Replaces need for three
separate forms: Employee Self-Assessment, Performance Review Summary, and Competencies
• Employee fills out green section
• Supervisor fills out tan section
04/19/23 15
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 17
• Use only when performance needs improvement in order to meet job requirements/expectations -- serves as formal notification
• Be specific about performance goals not met, what the employee needs to do to improve, and by when
• Use consistent language to corrective action documentation
2010 PMP Process - Tips
04/19/23 18
There should be no surprises in the review Do not put a performance problem or issue
in the appraisal that has never been mentioned to the employee
Focus on behaviors Does the overall summary reflect the
detail & vice versa?
Hey, what’s this all about? I thought I was doing great?
2012 PMP Process - Tips
• What to watch out for when writing and reviewing performance reviews:• Avoid colorful and subjective language• Do not provide too much information regarding medical leaves• Do not use personal names – use job titles• Bias – when arbitrary factors may influence the rater to distort
appraisal information• Horn Affect – focusing accomplishment on only negative things,
(such as a missed deadline)• Halo Affect – focusing accomplishments on only positive things • Leniency –all employees get high or low scores• Recency - when more weight is given to recent occurrences and
discounts the employees earlier performance
04/19/23 19
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 20
Performance management is not an annual appraisal…
The performance management process is designed to be an interactive exchange between employee and supervisor that occurs throughout the performance year.
The employee and supervisor should additionally have ongoing conversations throughout the year about progress. Goals and expectations can be revised as needed to meet the organizational business needs and goals.
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 21
• Appraisal is aimed a building confidence and competence
• Build respect and responsibility• Provide constructive feedback• Identify ways for employee to succeed• Aligning strategic goals with employee
development• Assist in salary management decisions
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 22
1. Specific – goals should be specific and tangible, they should be detailed enough to provide clear direction
2. Measurable – goals should be measurable, quantity, quality and cost
3. Achievable - goals are attainable given skill level, timeframe and resources
4. Responsible & Relevant – responsible party? who is accountable for achieving result - is the goal in line with needs
5. Timely – goals have a specific time for completion
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 23
Peer Review Form • Optional form you can use to
gather peer feedback
• Resource you can draw from when completing the Annual Review Summary
2012 PMP Process
04/19/23 24
Career Development Plan Form • Optional form employee can
submit along with Self Assessment
• Opportunity to create a plan for long-term learning and growth