performance analysis of processor

22
Performance Analysis of Processor Final Presentation Performed by: Alexei Iolin 307724211 Alexander Faingersh 306966912 Instructor: Evgeny Fiksman

Upload: goro

Post on 01-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Performance Analysis of Processor. Final Presentation. Performed by: Alexei Iolin 307724211 Alexander Faingersh 306966912 Instructor: Evgeny Fiksman. Agenda. Project Goals MicroBlaze architecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Performance Analysis of Processor

Final Presentation

Performed by: Alexei Iolin 307724211Alexander Faingersh 306966912

Instructor: Evgeny Fiksman

Page 2: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Agenda

• Project Goals

• MicroBlaze architecture

• OPB timer/counter and interrupt controller

• Connecting Customized IP to FSL bus

• Our Customized IP

• Time performance measurements

• Current measurements

• Conclusions

Page 3: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Project Goals

• Examination of MicroBlaze calculation abilities by measuring time of running applications and examining Interrupt handler abilities.

• Measuring power consumption by sampling current during program executions.

• Implementing arbitrary application in Hardware (IDCT) and using it as a hardware acceleration for MicroBlaze.

• Implementing the same functionality in C and comparing the results with hardware.

• Adding self written C code for testing FPU.

MicroBlaze is a Soft core Processor developed by Xilinx that meets performance, area-efficiency and low cost targets.Although using the MicroBlaze enables fast system development on a single FPGA, some of the “special” applications run slower than in Hardware IP. We will examine this with EDK environment

Page 4: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Hardware

Page 5: Performance Analysis of               Processor

EDK and MicroBlaze

• The Embedded Development Kit (EDK) is a set of microprocessor design tool and common software platforms. The EDK includes the Platform Studio tool suite, the MicroBlaze core and a library of peripheral IP cores.

• The MicroBlaze embedded soft core is a 32-bit

Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) optimized for implementation in FPGA. Operating at up to 200

MHz.

• MicroBlaze enables to have complete flexibility in setting peripherals, memory and interface features on a single FPGA

Page 6: Performance Analysis of               Processor

MicroBlaze Architecture MicroBlaze Hardware Options and Functions• Hardware Barrel Shifter• Hardware Divider• Machine Status Set and Clear Instructions• Hardware Exception Support• Pattern Compare Instructions• Floating-Point Unit (FPU)• Hardware Multiplier Enable

Bus Infrastructure• Data-side On-chip Peripheral

Bus (DOPB)• Instruction-side On-chip Peripheral Bus (IOPB)• Data-side Local Memory Bus

(DLMB)• Instruction-side Local Memory Bus (ILMB)• Fast Simplex Link (FSL)

Page 7: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Overall view on OPB peripherals

Page 8: Performance Analysis of               Processor

OPB Timer/Counter

The TC (Timer/Counter) is a 32-bit timer module that attaches to the OPB.

• Two programmable interval timers with interrupt, event generation, and event capture capabilities.

• Each timer has 3 32bit registers:

1. TCSR - Control Register

2. TLR - Load Register

3. TCR - Counter Register

• Both timer/counter modules can be used in a Generate Mode, a Capture Mode, or a Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) Mode.

Page 9: Performance Analysis of               Processor

OPB Interrupt Controller

Page 10: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Continuing INTC…

INTC Features

• Priority between interrupt requests is determined by vector position.

• Supports data bus widths of 8-bits, 16-bits, or 32-bits for OPB interface.

• Number of interrupt inputs configurable up to the width of data bus.

• Interrupt Enable Register (IER) for selectively disabling individual interrupt inputs.

• Master Enable Register for disabling interrupt request output and choosing software or hardware interrupts.

• Each input is configurable for edge or level sensitivity.

Page 11: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Connecting Customized IP to FSL BUS

• MicroBlaze has the ability to use its dedicated FSL bus interface to integrate a customized IP core into a MicroBlaze soft processor-based system.

• Generally, there are two ways to integrate a customized IP core into a MicroBlaze

1. One way is to connect the IP on the (OPB) .

2. The second way is to connect the user IP to the

MicroBlaze dedicated Fast Simplex Link (FSL) bus system.

• If the application is time-critical, the designer should take bus standard delays into account, thus the user IP should be connected to the FSL bus system.

Otherwise, it can be connected as a slave or master on the OPB.

Page 12: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Continuing Our Customized IP…The whole embedded system consists of the MicroBlaze itself, two FSL bus systems, the user core, an OPB on-chip bus, two OPB peripherals (UART lite ,Timer and Interrupt Controller) and the on-chip block RAM. The application program is stored in the on-chip block RAM.

efiksman
Draw your design. Where the counter, where the interrupt controller????
Page 13: Performance Analysis of               Processor

• It is possible to use more than 2 dynamic inputs and more than 1 output because up to 16 FSL interface busses are provided.

• User IP is independent, doesn’t affect the internal MB RISC architecture thus won’t decrease the clock frequency of MB.

• Outside implementation of IP allows to run customs calculations parallel to main stream application.

• The new hardware doesn't require inline assembler code because the FSL interface has predefined C-macros for I/O to IP

Page 14: Performance Analysis of               Processor

• We connected 1-dimension IDCT HW block on specially configured FSL .

• A 1-dimension IDCT realized in software requires a high execution time because the C- program executes many loops sequentially .

• Implementation of application as hardware module greatly reduces the execution time due to parallel processing.

• The software application writes 8 values from memory to the FSL. The IDCT core gets the data, calculates the result and returns the result data (8 words) back to MB trough the FSL.

• The HW implementation of IDCT is written in VHDL (the code is available in EDK IP wizard

Our Customized IP

efiksman
Please describe only what you did, this is not your design !!!
Page 15: Performance Analysis of               Processor

HDL Structure

Page 16: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Time measurements• The time measurement relies on accessing the Timer/Counter MB

OPB peripheral and controlling Timer's counting registers.• The counter I set to count CPU clocks during the program execution

periods.• Time is calculated from counter value and the system clock

frequency.• Measurement result for example:

We can see that the time is T=9366019 clocks. The MB frequency is 100MHz. Thus the time is T= 9366019/100exp(+6) = 93.66 msec.

Page 17: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Interrupt controller time measurements

1. Measure the clean program time (T)

2. Load the Time register with A=0XFFFFFFFF- T+ 0XFF

3. Measure the final time including INTC (T1)

4. Delta = T1- (A+FF)

Page 18: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Total time measurements results

Application Time

IDCT SW Fixed point 320.31 usec

IDCT SW Floating point

93.66 msec

IDCT HW Fixed point (FSL)

12.31 usec

Empty Interrupt handler

1.12 usec

Printing character to RS232

53.85 msec

efiksman
please add slide with diagram of measuring Interupt handler time
Page 19: Performance Analysis of               Processor

The current measurement relies on connecting power resistor serially to MB 1.5v power block and recording the voltage on the resistor by sampling with NI DAC Labview system.The program repeated for 5000 times for better statistics. SampleFreq=20KHz. For example:

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.2

0.22

0.24

time [sec]

curr

ent

[a]

Current measurement of fixed point SW

initial position

program execution

eternity loop

Current measurements

Page 20: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Current measurements results

Application Mean initial and eternity current [a]

Mean program current [a]

Max

program current [a]

Mean Power [mw]

IDCT SW Fixed point

0.1683 0.1649 0.2253 ~ 250

IDCT SW Floating point

0.2504 0.1953 0.2714 ~ 350

IDCT HW Fixed point (FSL)

0.2113 0.1614 0.2225 ~ 280 

Page 21: Performance Analysis of               Processor

ConclusionsApplication Mean initial

and eternity current [a]

Mean program current [a]

Max

program current [a]

Time Mean Power [mw]

Mean Energy

[ujoule]

IDCT SW Fixed point

0.1683 0.1649 0.2253 320.31 usec

~ 250 80

IDCT SW Floating point

0.2504 0.1953 0.2714 93.66 msec

~ 350 32781

IDCT HW Fixed point (FSL)

0.2113 0.1614 0.2225 12.31 usec

~ 280 3.45

• MicroBlaze is a very effective solution for easily configurable systems demands.

• Distinguishing critical passes and implementing them in HW can greatly decrease execution time.

• FSL is the most effective (energy and time) way for connecting HW acceleration to MB.

• FPU is the most problematic consumer. Massive use of FPU is not recommended in MB.

• Interrupts input frequency is maximum 890kHz.

efiksman
Please present also minimal time between intterupts
Page 22: Performance Analysis of               Processor

Questions?