peres lattices in nuclear structure and beyond
DESCRIPTION
Peres Lattices in Nuclear Structure and Beyond. Pavel Str ánský 1 , Michal Macek 1 , Pavel Cejnar 1 , Jan Dobe š 2. 1 Institute of Particle and Nuclear Phycics Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. 2 Nuclear Physics Institute Řež - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Peres Lattices in Nuclear Structure and Beyond
Pavel Stránský1, Michal Macek1, Pavel Cejnar1, Jan Dobeš2
CGS-13, Cologne, Germany 26.8.2008
1Institute of Particle and Nuclear Phycics
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
2Nuclear Physics Institute Řež
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
2. Examples
- Geometric Collective Model (GCM)
- Interacting Boson Model (IBM)
1. Visualising and measuring chaos
- Classical and Quantum chaos
- Peres lattices
Peres Lattices in Nuclear Structure and Beyond
Visualising and Measuring Chaos
Classical chaos
Section aty = 0
•Trajectories•Poincaré sections
x
y
x
x
Classical chaos
REGULAR area
CHAOTIC area
freg=0.611 x
x
•Fraction of regularity
E
GOE
GUE
GSE
P(s)
s
Poisson
CHAOTIC systemREGULAR system
Quantum chaos •Spectral statistics
Nearest Neighbour Spacing
distribution
Brodydistributionparameter
nonintegrable
<P>
E
Peres lattices2D quantum system:
A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 1711
E
integrable
P
Fully regular lattice regular chaotic
regular
Examples 1. Geometric Collective
Model
GCM HamiltonianT…Kinetic term
V…Potential
Nonrotating case J = 0!
Principal axes system (PAS)
Special choice (scaling): A = -1, C = 1
(a) 5D system restricted to 2D (true geometric model
of nuclei)
(b) 2D system
2 physically important quantization options:
O(5) invariant (seniority) restricted to J = 0 O(2) invariant
Peres operator
Levels and wave functions
Probability density of
wave function
Peres lattice
E
x
E
<P>
B=0.005 – small perturbation
B=0.05 – greater perturbation
<P>
E
B = 0 – integrable case
<P>
E
A=-1, K=C=1Integrability, Onset of chaos
B = 0.24 – the most chaotic case
<P>
E
Dominion of chaos
Remnants of regularity
E
Island of regularity
<P>
Different quantizations
2D
5D
Peres invariant classically
• Connection with the arc of regularity (IBM)
• – vibrations resonance
E
PT
Zoom into sea of levels
Dependence on the classicality parameter
E
1- Quantum
Classical
freg
Classical x quantum view (more examples)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(b) B=0.445 (c) B=1.09(a) B=0.24
<P>
freg
E
E
Examples2. Interacting Boson Model
IBM Hamiltonian
3 different dynamical symmetries
U(5)SU(3)
O(6)
0 0
1
Casten triangle
a – scaling parameter
Invariant of O(5) (seniority)
3 different dynamical symmetries
U(5)SU(3)
O(6)
IBM Hamiltonian
0 0
1
Casten triangle
Invariant of O(5) (seniority)
a – scaling parameter
3 different Peres
operators
Different invariants
= 0.5
N = 40
U(5)
SU(3)
O(5)
Arc of regularity
Variance lattices
- degeneracies
• SU(3) invariant
= -1.0
N = 30
= 0.5
Variance lattices • U(5) invariant
• Phonon calculationn
nexc
(mean-field approximation)
basis:
= -1.32
Wave functions components in SU(3) basis
• Phonon calculation(mean-field
approximation)basis:
Quasidynamical symmetry(same amplitude for all low-L states)
L = 0,2,4,6,8
Summary – Peres lattices
1. Vivid tool for visualising quantum chaos, especially in 2D systems
2. Capability of distinguishing between „chaotic“ and „regular“ levels
3. Enormous freedom in choosing Peres invariant
4. Peres lattices can be constructed both for mean value and variance of the chosen operator. Variance lattices can show more subtle features of the systém.
More results in friendly interactive form on
http://www-ucjf.troja.mff.cuni.cz/~geometric
~stransky
Thank you for your attention
Peres lattices and invariant
A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 1711
constant of motion
J1
J2
Arbitrary 2D system
constant for each trajectory and more generally for each torus
EBK Quantization quantu
m numbers
Difference between eigenvalues of A
(valid for any constant of motion)