percentage of staff with correct - wessexdeanery.nhs.uk. karen kingston other solent nhs.pdf · key...

1
Reducing Risk on Snowdon Ward Snowdon Ward Karen Kingston [email protected] 5. Measures/Outcomes Initial measurement justified the need for improvement with only 42% of staff being able to identify those high risk patients. After the changes were made this increased to 100% of staff ensuring all patients were safe in relation to the three key areas. 100% 100% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% How many patients on the ward are under DOLS? How many patients on the ward have swallowing difficulties? How many patients on the ward are not for resus? Percentage of staff with correct information (After) The team tested out the new board for two weeks gathering feedback from staff Test a new magnetic white board to display patient information Set out temporary layout on the whiteboard Agree coloured codes for each of the three risks Identified some changes to the board template to make it easier to read and sustain Changes were made 4.1 PDSA Cycle 1 1. Problem/Issue Staff on Snowdon Ward recognised that important patient safety information regarding swallowing difficulties, resus status and DoLS (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards) was not being communicated effectively during handover. This placed their neuro rehab patients at risk. PLAN 2. Aim By March 2018 all Snowdon Ward staff will be able to identify patients that are not for resuscitation, have swallowing difficulties or are under a DoLS, supporting safer care on the ward. 3. Actions Taken Agreed to audit current staff knowledge on the 3 problem areas. Audit tool developed by team. External support to complete the audit following handover to limit bias. (n=8) The team tested this for a further two weeks Set out the new layout with permanent grid tape and pen Re-Audited using the same method to collect baseline data The success was shared 4.2 PDSA Cycle 2 6. Learning Outcomes Staff recognised the importance of clear, visual and correct information being displayed in an area where clinical conversations occur. Staff acknowledged this was a small scale change which had a large impact and this has motivated them to make further Quality Improvements relating to patient safety and their clinical handover. STUDY ACT DO PLAN DO STUDY ACT Patient Status Board 25% 0% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% How many patients on the ward are under DOLS? How many patients on the ward have swallowing difficulties? How many patients on the ward are not for resus? Percentage of staff with correct information (Baseline)

Upload: haduong

Post on 28-Feb-2019

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Reducing Risk on Snowdon Ward

Snowdon Ward Karen Kingston

[email protected]

5. Measures/Outcomes

Initial measurement justified the need for

improvement with only 42% of staff being

able to identify those high risk patients.

After the changes were made this

increased to 100% of staff ensuring all

patients were safe in relation to the three

key areas.

100%

100%

100%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

How many patients on

the ward are under

DOLS?

How many patients on

the ward have

swallowing difficulties?

How many patients on

the ward are not for

resus?

Percentage of staff with correct

information (After)

The team

tested out

the new

board for two

weeks

gathering

feedback

from staff

Test a new

magnetic white

board to display

patient

information

Set out

temporary layout

on the

whiteboard

Agree coloured

codes for each of

the three risks

Identified some

changes to the

board template

to make it easier

to read and

sustain

Changes

were

made

4.1 PDSA Cycle 1

1. Problem/Issue Staff on Snowdon Ward recognised that important patient safety information regarding swallowing difficulties, resus status and DoLS (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards) was not being communicated effectively during handover. This placed their neuro rehab patients at risk.

PLAN

2. Aim

By March 2018 all Snowdon Ward

staff will be able to identify patients

that are not for resuscitation, have

swallowing difficulties or are under

a DoLS, supporting safer care on

the ward. 3. Actions Taken

Agreed to audit current staff knowledge

on the 3 problem areas.

Audit tool developed by team.

External support to complete the audit

following handover to limit bias. (n=8)

The team tested this for a further two weeks

Set out the new layout with permanent grid tape and pen

Re-Audited using the same method to collect baseline data

The success was shared

4.2 PDSA Cycle 2

6. Learning Outcomes

Staff recognised the importance of

clear, visual and correct information

being displayed in an area where

clinical conversations occur.

Staff acknowledged this was a

small scale change which had a

large impact and this has motivated

them to make further Quality

Improvements relating to patient

safety and their clinical handover.

STUDY ACT

DO PLAN

DO

STUDY ACT

Patient Status Board

25%0%

100%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

How many patients onthe ward are under

DOLS?

How many patients onthe ward have

swallowing difficulties?

How many patients onthe ward are not for

resus?

Percentage of staff with correct information (Baseline)