per crater thermal - massachusetts institute of technology1 lunar reconnaissance orbiter (lro) per...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)PER ThermalJuly 23, 2008
Thermal Design
Charles Baker/545
2NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
CRaTER Telescope Wall and Radiator I/Fs - Hot Beta 0°
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Time (min)
Tem
p (
°C)
hb00:CRATER.10606 hb00:CRRAD.1016 hb00:CRRAD.1019 hb00:CRRAD.1022
hb00:CRRAD.1064 hb00:CRRAD.1067 hb00:CRRAD.1070
Hot Transient Predicts
Telescope Wall
3NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Radiator Area
• Most radiators have >25% of potential area available– LOLA OTA has 19%– LROC Instruments have 0%
m_ in_ m_ in_ m_ in_
ITP/Avionics 2.54 3933 1.88 2912 0.66 1021 26.0
Battery 0.26 403 0.10 155 0.16 248 61.5
Star Camera 1 0.08 120 0.04 58 0.04 62 51.6
Star Camera 2 0.07 108 0.03 51 0.04 57 52.8
CRaTER 0.18 282 0.09 133 0.10 150 53.1
LEND 0.17 256 0.05 77 0.12 179 69.9
LOLA MEB 0.09 134 0.06 99 0.02 35 26.3
LOLA OTA 0.14 216 0.11 176 0.03 40 18.5
LAMP 0.03 45 0.02 29 0.01 17 36.8
LROC SCS 0.02 25 0.02 25 0.00 0 0.0
LROC WAC 0.02 25 0.02 25 0.00 0 0.0
LROC NACU 0.05 74 0.05 74 0.00 0 0.0
LROC NACL 0.05 74 0.05 74 0.00 0 0.0
Component % AvailableTotal Used Available
4NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Correlated Models StatusComponent Test Correlated Delivered to LRO
Integrated into
Orbiter Model
CRaTER yes yes yes
LEND yes yes yes
LOLA MEB yes yes yes
LOLA OTA yes yes yes
LAMP yes yes yes
LROC SCS yes yes yes
LROC WAC yes yes no
LROC NACU yes yes no
LROC NACL yes yes no
Mini RF - Antenna yes yes yes
Mini RF - Electronics yes yes no
Diviner yes yes yes
Star Camera +X yes yes yes
Star Camera -X yes yes yes
Battery yes yes no
PSE yes yes yes
PDE yes yes yes
C&DH no no no
SA Controller yes yes no
HGA Controller yes yes no
IMU yes yes yes
RWA yes yes yes
S-Band Transponder yes yes yes
Ka-Band TWTA no no no
Ka-Band Modulator no no no
Actuators yes yes yes (HGAS/SAS)
5NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Pending Flight ModelUpdates/Analyses
• Assess off nadir pointing, roll about the X axis (+/-20°) for 20minutes at Beta 0°
• Incorporation of correlated LROC NAC & WAC instrumentmodels
• Creation and incorporation of reduced battery model
6NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Heater Power Summary
Driving Tightest System power margin is Lunar Eclipse
•Avionics Dissipated Power will be 175 W•Total estimated power draw is 456 W versus 605 W allocation
Spacecraft 151 0 105 23 260 65
Propulsion 97 5 95 85 52 67
OB/Instruments* 113 12 125 111 89 66
Deployables 83 83 83 83 83 83
Total 444 100 409 301 484 281
*OB/Instruments operational heaters @ 31V for all cases
HeatersCold Op
B90° (27V)
LE Preheat
(31V)
Lunar Ecl.
(27V)
Hot Op
B0° (31V)
Early Cruise
(27V)
Late Cruise
(31V)
7NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 7LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
7
Test Predicts – Thermal BalanceSpacecraft and Avionics
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
8NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 8LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
8
Test Predicts – Thermal BalancePropulsion
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
9NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 9LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
Test Predicts – Thermal BalanceDeployables
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
(UpperHousing)
(LowerHousing)
(Hinge Potentiometer)
(Hinge Damper)
(Hinge Rotary Joint)
(HGAS Boom)
(Lower Rotary Joint)
(Lower Actuator)
(Upper Rotary Joint)
(Upper Actuator)
Temperature
[ SAS ]
[ HGAS ]
10NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 10LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
10
Test Predicts – Thermal BalanceInstrument Interfaces
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
11NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 11LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
11
Test Predicts – Thermal BalanceInstruments – Internal Telemetry
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
[ MINI-RF ]
[ LEND ]
[ LOLA ]
12NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008 12LRO Thermal/545 17 July 2008
12• DIVINER cold case beta angle differs from spacecraft cold case beta angle
Test Predicts – Thermal BalanceInstruments – Internal Telemetry
Balance Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Thermal SoakPredicts (Cold – Hot)
Flight Predicts(Cold – Hot)
Early Cruise TestPredict (Cold)
[ LROC ]
[ LAMP ]
[ DIVINER ]
[ CRATER ]
13NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Thermal Balance Test Profile
LRO Thermal Balance Test Profile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Days
Survival
Cold Op
Ambient
Hot Op
1 - Pump Down
2 - Hot Op Transition
3 - Hot Op Balance
4 - Hot Transient
5 - Hot Prop Test
6 - Cold Op Transition
7 - Cold Op Balance
8 - Lunar Eclipse Warmup
9 - Lunar Eclipse Sim
10 - Lunar Eclipse Followup
11 - Cold Survival Transition
12 - Cold Survival Balance
13 - Cold Prop Test
14 - Cold Start
15 - Transition to Cold Soak #1
16 - Cold Soak #1
17 - Transition to Ambient
6
5
14
11
2
10
9
8
7
3
4
1
13
12
16
15
17
14NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Thermal Cycling Test ProfileLRO Thermal Vacuum Cycling Profile
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Days
Survival
Qual Cold
Ambient
Qual Hot
Note: Cold Soak #1
completed during
thermal balance
9
2
5
8
10 6
4
13
7
1
3
19
15
14
12
11
17
18
16
1 - Pump Down
2 - Transition to Hot Soak #1
3 - Hot Start
4 - Hot Soak #1
5 - Transition to Cold Soak #2
6 - Cold Soak #2
7 - Transtion to Hot Soak #2
8 - Hot Soak #2
9 - Transition to Cold Soak #3
10 - Cold Soak #3
11 - Transition to Hot Soak #3
12 - Hot Soak #3
13 - Transition to Cold Soak #4
14 - Cold Soak #4
15 - Transition to Hot Soak #4
16 - Hot Soak #4
17 - Transition to Bakeout
18 - Bakeout
19 - Transition to Ambient
15NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
LRO Thermal/545 23 July 2008
Conclusions
•Test Plan and Test Fixture Build in good shape•All lifts have been dry run•Test Analysis is complete, though will be tweaked thru TRR•Thermal Balance test plan is adequate to demonstrate LRO thermalperformance and correlate the thermal model
•LRO Thermal is on Track for an LRO Orbiter test in mid September