pepper response to sandea

18
Pepper Response to Sandea A. Stanley Culpepper Keith Rucker And Tim Flanders The University of Georgia

Upload: brandy

Post on 09-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Pepper Response to Sandea. A. Stanley Culpepper Keith Rucker And Tim Flanders The University of Georgia. OBJECTIVE. Determine pepper tolerance to Sandea applied precision-directed, topical, or under plastic. Treatments Under plastic. 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 ounces Sandea per Acre - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Response to Sandea

A. Stanley Culpepper

Keith Rucker

And

Tim Flanders

The University of Georgia

Page 2: Pepper Response to Sandea

OBJECTIVE

Determine pepper tolerance to Sandea applied precision-directed, topical, or under plastic.

Page 3: Pepper Response to Sandea

TreatmentsUnder plastic

• 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 ounces Sandea per Acre

• 4 replications per treatment

* All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume

Page 4: Pepper Response to Sandea

TreatmentsOver-the-Top and Directed

• 0.5 ounces Sandea per Acre

• 4 replications per treatment

* All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume

Page 5: Pepper Response to Sandea

Application Information

• Plots = 6 ft. by 15 ft.

• 20 or 14.8 GPA spray solution

• Directed treatments precision applied to lower 25% of plant canopy

• Injury ratings measured

• Three harvest dates

Page 6: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

20

40

60

0.5 oz/A directed 0.5 oz/A topical

% in

jury

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Postemergence. 14 DAT.

Page 7: Pepper Response to Sandea

Sandea (0.5 oz/A) topical

Non-treated

Page 8: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2.

a

b

Page 9: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

200

400

600

800

1000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 3.

b

ab

Page 10: Pepper Response to Sandea

0

600

1200

1800

2400

3000

None 0.5 oz/Adirected

0.5 oz/A topical

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

b

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Total Harvest.

ab

b

Page 11: Pepper Response to Sandea
Page 12: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Under Plastic. 6 WAP, 8 WAT.

0

10

20

30

40

0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

% in

jury

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

a

ab

b

Page 13: Pepper Response to Sandea

Non-treated Sandea (0.5 oz/A)

applied under plastic

Page 14: Pepper Response to Sandea

Non-treated Sandea (1.0 oz/A)

applied under plastic

Page 15: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2.

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

aa a

b

Page 16: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 3.

0

300

600

900

1200

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

aa a

b

abb

a

Page 17: Pepper Response to Sandea

Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Total Yield.

0

600

1200

1800

2400

3000

None 0.5 oz/A 0.75 oz/A 1 oz/A

box

/A

Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.

Page 18: Pepper Response to Sandea

Conclusions

• Pepper tolerance to topical Sandea applications is unacceptable.

• Directed applications most likely unacceptable.

• Additional research focusing on Sandea under plastic is needed but tolerance and

nutsedge control is questionable.