people vs. valdes
DESCRIPTION
nat resTRANSCRIPT
PEOPLE V. ABE VALDEZ
G.R. NO. 129296
Accused was found guilty of violating the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972., An extrajudicial confession was
made as to the ownership of marijuana plants.
HELD:
The marijuana plants seized were product of an illegal search because of the absence of search warrant and
are therefore inadmissible in evidence. The voluntary confession of ownership of marijuana was in violation
of the custodial rights because of the absence of competent and independent counsel, and thus,
inadmissible too. In sum, both the object evidence and the testimonial evidence as to the appellant’s
voluntary confession of ownership of the prohibited plants relied upon to prove appellant’s guilt failed to
meet the test of constitutional competence. Without these, the prosecution’s remaining evidence did not
even approximate the quantum of evidence necessary to warrant appellant’s conviction. Hence, the
presumption of innocence on his favor stands.