pension clients sleepwalking into fiduciary management - plenum group

1
www.theplenumgroup.com Plenum 2013 – Financial Services Executive Search Are Asset Management Clients Now “Sleepwalking Into Fiduciary Management” ? The consulting community has long been criticized by asset managers for the way it converts its advisory clients into fiduciary clients. Asset managers (joined by some vocal consultants who do not provide an implemented consulting or fiduciary service) have suggested that many pension clients are “sleepwalking into a fiduciary arrangement” without the benefit of a transparent tender process. This issue is fiercely debated and unlikely to go away anytime soon, but the phenomenon that receives less attention is the growing trend of asset managers who may have adopted an attitude of “if you cant beat them join them”. Many are said to be actively seeking to convert their back book of clients into fiduciary mandates. As any business developer will tell you, it is much easier to secure a meeting with an existing client than it is a new prospect. Some commentators have suggested that a leading asset manager (with leading fiduciary offering) has been making a concerted effort to ensure a conversation about its fiduciary proposition is incorporated into the regular meetings held with its existing pool of pension clients. We are yet to be told of an example where the asset manager’s steadfast belief in open and transparent tenders has prevented it from simply migrating an interested pension client across to a full fiduciary service. Furthermore, some cynics have suggested that some LDI schemes have deliberately been made so complex so that once on board, clients will be reluctant to (or unable to) unwind the relationship. Regardless of the potential rights and wrongs of various approaches to securing clients, with one trillion of UK legacy DB assets to fight over, it looks like we’ll be discussing conflicts of interest for some time to come…….. To discuss further please contact TC Jefferson [email protected] or Angus Henderson [email protected] Originally published by The Plenum Group www.theplenumgroup.com

Upload: plenumgroupresearch

Post on 25-Jun-2015

56 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

An observation that asset management clients also have pension clients that can be converted into fiduciary mandates....

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pension Clients Sleepwalking into Fiduciary Management - Plenum Group

www.theplenumgroup.com

Plenum 2013 – Financial Services Executive Search

Are Asset Management Clients Now

“Sleepwalking Into Fiduciary Management” ?

The consulting community has long been criticized by asset managers for the way it converts its advisory clients into fiduciary clients.

Asset managers (joined by some vocal consultants who do not provide an implemented consulting or fiduciary service) have suggested that many pension clients are “sleepwalking into a fiduciary arrangement” without the benefit of a transparent tender process.

This issue is fiercely debated and unlikely to go away anytime soon, but the phenomenon that receives less attention is the growing trend of asset managers who may have adopted an attitude of “if you cant beat them join them”. Many are said to be actively seeking to convert their back book of clients into fiduciary mandates. As any business developer will tell you, it is much easier to secure a meeting with an existing client than it is a new prospect.

Some commentators have suggested that a leading asset manager (with leading fiduciary offering) has been making a concerted effort to ensure a conversation about its fiduciary proposition is incorporated into the regular meetings held with its existing pool of pension clients.

We are yet to be told of an example where the asset manager’s steadfast belief in open and transparent tenders has prevented it from simply migrating an interested pension client across to a full fiduciary service.

Furthermore, some cynics have suggested that some LDI schemes have deliberately been made so complex so that once on board, clients will be reluctant to (or unable to) unwind the relationship.

Regardless of the potential rights and wrongs of various approaches to securing clients, with one trillion of UK legacy DB assets to fight over, it looks like we’ll be discussing conflicts of interest for some time to come……..

To discuss further please contact TC Jefferson [email protected] or Angus Henderson [email protected]

Originally published by The Plenum Group

www.theplenumgroup.com