penn state york literacy alberti

45
The Common Core State Standards for ELA/Literacy Sandra Alberti

Upload: aileen-hower

Post on 17-Nov-2014

168 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

The Common Core State Standards for ELA/Literacy

Sandra Alberti

Page 2: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 2

Opportunities that require clarification

• Standards aligned vs. Standards based

• Standards vs. Standardization

• Standards vs. Curriculum

• Not a ceiling, but a message about priority

Page 3: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 3

Key Shifts in Instruction Prompted by the Common Core State Standards

1. Complexity: Regular practice with complex text (and its academic language)

2. Evidence: Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from text

3. Knowledge: Building knowledge through content-rich informational texts

Page 4: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 4

Key Shifts Build Toward College and Career Readiness for All Students

Engage with Complex Text

Extract and Employ

Evidence

Build Knowledge

Page 5: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 5

Instructional Implications for Key Shift One:Regular practice with complex text (and its academic language)

Page 6: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 6

Key Shift 1: Complex Text

Why relevant and important?

• What students can read, in terms of complexity, is greatest predictor of success in college (ACT study)

• Gap between complexity of college and high school texts is huge (4 years!)

• ACT tells us too many students are reading at too low a level (<50% of graduates can read sufficiently complex texts)

Deficiencies are not equal opportunity. . .

Page 7: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 7

Where is “Complex Text” in the standards?

• Reading Standard 10 includes a staircase of increasing text complexity, grade by grade.

• Anchor Standard 10 reads, “Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.”

Page 8: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 8

Some Features of Complex Text

• Complex sentences (sentence length); longer paragraphs

• Uncommon vocabulary (word length, word familiarity)

• Lack of repetition, overlap or similarity in words and sentences

• Subtle and/or frequent transitions; lack of words, sentences or

paragraphs that review or pull things together for reader

• Multiple and/or subtle themes and purposes

• Dense information

• Unfamiliar settings, topics or events

• Informational (rather than narrative) text structures and/or

mixes structures

Page 9: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 9

Informing Instruction Through Qualitative Analysis

• If my text has complicated syntax and sentence structures. . .

• If my text has many and varying vocabulary demands…

• If my text has multiple and subtle levels of meaning or purpose. . .

• If my text has specialized knowledge demands or includes a great deal of information. . .

• If my text has mixed, changing, or unconventional structures. . .

• If my text has essential graphics/ visual supports…

Then I should intentionally focus instructional time on this element!

Page 10: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 10

Navigating Text Complexity

http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity.html

Page 11: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 11

Text Complexity Roadmaps

Page 12: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 12

Is there still a role for pre-reading?

Yes. And teachers around the country are…

• Offering highly focused pre-reading activities that do not preempt or provide knowledge that can be gained from a careful read of the text

• Limiting pre-reading to no more than 10% of time set aside for focusing on the text

• Thinking about when best to offer supports to students: What must I do before? What can wait?

• Giving thought to what’s been planned as part of pre-reading and then reflecting again so as not to fall into old patterns

• Using student reading as pre-reading, i.e., using simplified texts to build student competence and background knowledge so students can access the more complex text

Page 13: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 13

Can we depend on the passages in our pre-Common Core textbooks?

Yes, mostly. But teachers around the country are…

• Asking publishers to supply complexity metrics of the passages in textbooks or running the complexity metrics themselves (publically available: Lexile, Reading Maturity, ATOS)

• Moving textbooks originally designed for their grade down to a lower grade

• Spending time on the qualitative complexity of texts

Page 14: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 14

Is close reading all students need?

No! Teachers around the country…

• Know that in addition to closely reading texts, students need the opportunity to read a volume of texts to build their vocabularies and general knowledge

• Are setting aside time for accountable independent reading of 20 minutes per day which translates into students gaining the equivalent of about 60 whole school days of reading by grade 6!

• Are creating structures that track independent reading through student journals, reading logs, book clubs, book talks, individual conferences, and the like

Page 15: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 15

Is there still a role for leveled text?

Yes. Teachers around the country…

• Know that in addition to complex text, students need lots of practice to read texts closer to their own independent reading level

• Know that students reading at their own level is where stamina and persistence develop, and where vocabularies and knowledge bases can be rapidly expanded!

• Are re-conceptualizing the guided reading block so:• It includes accountable independent reading at a student’s level, but

not as rigidly leveled as traditional guided reading

• It privileges student choice because when students are invested in a topic, they have stamina to read at higher levels

• Students who most need it get focused time with their teacher in small groups

Page 16: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 16

Can we closely read entire novels?

Of course! Teachers around the country are…

• Concentrating on challenging sections of novels in class to study organization, sentence structures, word choice, symbolism, character development, plot advancement, etc.

• What’s worth knowing here?• In what ways does this excerpt rely upon, relate to, or affect other portions

of the text?• In what ways does this excerpt relate to the book’s theme? Propel the

action?• What has the author hinted at?

• Assigning other parts of the novel for independent reading and asking students to annotate the text in preparation for classroom discussions

Page 17: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 17

Should we organize around standards or the text?

The text! Teachers around the country are…

• Discarding traditional pacing guides that detail when a particular content standard should be taught and/or assessed

• Abandoning a checklist approach and asking sequences of questions that touch on several standards at once

• Bundling standards across domains in each lesson, too (integrating reading, writing, speaking and language)

• Slowing down, chunking texts, reading, re-reading, spending days on a single text rather than rushing through or reading a text only once

Page 18: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 18

Instructional Implications for Key Shift Two: Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence

Page 19: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 19

Key Shift 2: Evidence!

Why relevant and important?

• Most college and workplace writing requires evidence

• Ability to cite evidence differentiates strong from weak student performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in reading

• Being able to locate and deploy evidence are hallmarks of strong readers and writers

Page 20: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 20

Where is “Evidence” in the standards?

The standards prioritize students’ command of evidence across the domains of reading, writing, speaking & listening:• Rigorously cite evidence from texts to support

claims/inferences (Reading Standard 1)

• Draw evidence from texts to support analysis, reflection and research (Writing Standard 9)

• Engage in purposeful evidence-based talk (Speaking and Listening Standard 1)

Page 21: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 21

Nature of Text-Dependent Questions

• Text-dependent questions provide students a wholly text-dependent experience when reading complex informational text.

• Personal bias is minimized in favor of the text evidence—no reliance on personal experience or knowledge to construct appropriate, evidence-based answers.

• Text-dependent questions privilege the text and allow students to deal with information that is directly before them.

Page 22: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 22

Drawing Evidence from Texts

Text-DependentNot Text-Dependent

In “Casey at the Bat,” Casey strikes out. Describe a time when you failed at something.

In “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King discusses nonviolent protest. Discuss, in writing, a time when you wanted to fight against something that you felt was unfair.

From “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer,” have students identify the different methods of removing warts that Tom and Huck talk about. Ask students to devise their own charm to remove warts. Are there cultural ideas or artifacts from the current time that could be used in the charm?

What makes Casey’s experiences at bat humorous?

What can you infer from King’s letter about the letter that he received?

Why does Tom hesitate to allow Ben to paint the fence? How does Twain construct his sentences to reflect that hesitation? What effect do Tom’s hesitations have on Ben?

Page 23: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 23

Can we depend on questions from our textbooks at elementary school?

Well, not really. Teachers around the country are…

• Supplementing and supplanting current resources with text dependent questions through the Basal Alignment Project—a library of almost 250 teacher-developed lessons for grades 3-5:

Page 24: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 24

Can we depend on questions from our textbooks at middle school?

Well, not really. Teachers around the country are…• Supplementing and supplanting current resources with text

dependent questions through the Anthology Alignment Project—almost 100 teacher-developed lessons for grades 6-8

Page 25: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 25

Are text-to-self questions permitted?

Yes. But teachers around the country are…

• Using text-to-self connections more sparingly, realizing that too often personal response had replaced an analysis of the text

• Beginning by focusing on the text itself (rather than connections): what the words say, structure of the text, specific word choice and implications of authorial choices

• Only then (in later readings after the text has been deeply and completely analyzed) asking students how the text connects to their life and views and how the text connects to other texts

Page 26: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 26

Should students write to every text?

Yes! Teachers around the country are…

• Including a range of short and on demand pieces in addition to longer process pieces in upper elementary and beyond

• Providing students writing prompts that• Are contextualized, in other words, they are based on a

text

• Use the language of the standard where appropriate

• Are specific regarding the use of evidence in student responses

• Cross domains so a single prompt may assess writing, language, and reading standards

Page 27: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 27

Instructional Implications for Key Shift Three: Building knowledge through content rich nonfiction

Page 28: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 28

Key Shift 3: Building Knowledge

Why relevant and important?

• Non-fiction makes up the vast majority of required reading in college/workplace

• Informational text is harder for students to comprehend than narrative text

• Boys lag girls in reading… research shows males prefer reading informational texts over narrative fiction

• Bundling texts around a topic increases academic vocabulary growth by as much as 4x (Adams and Landauer)

Page 29: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 29

Where is “Building Knowledge” in the standards?

• Common Core pertains to literacy across the disciplines of science, social studies, and technical subjects

• Building knowledge appears most directly in the writing standards 7-9 that pertain to research

• Several reading standards ask students to compare, contrast, synthesize information across several texts on the same topic

• Page 33 of the standards (Human Body) shows what it means to provide students with a coherent selection of texts

Page 30: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 30

Is literature “out” in ELA classes?

Absolutely not! And ELA teachers across the country are…

• Bringing additional content-rich literary nonfiction—texts worth reading and re-reading—into their curriculum

• Building text sets that include fiction and literary nonfiction texts that “talk to each other” when building units of study

• Providing students with coherent selections of strategically-sequenced texts so they can build knowledge about a topic

Page 31: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 31

By informational, do we mean reading bus schedules and gov’t regulations in ELA?

No. But ELA teachers around the country are…

Adding more literary nonfiction texts to their lessons. Here are some examples:• Narrative of the Life of Frederic Douglass an American

Slave• Travels with Charley: In Search of America• Speeches by Patrick Henry, George Washington, Abraham

Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Learned Hand, Margaret Chase Smith, Elie Wiesel, Ronald Reagan and the like

• The Declaration of Independence and The Bill of Rights• Paine’s Common Sense, Thoreau’s Walden, and

Emerson’s “Society and Solitude”

Page 32: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 32

Can we depend on our ELA textbooks for the right balance of passages?

No. Teachers around the country are…

• Supplementing mainly narrative textbook passages with a collection of related texts organized around a topic or line of inquiry.

A given text set…

• Is determined by an anchor text—a rich, complex grade-level anchor text—that is the focus of a close reading

• Includes texts that are connected meaningfully to each other to so that in reading the set, students build a coherent body of knowledge around the topic

• Varies in terms of number of texts depending on purpose and resource availability around a given topic

Page 33: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 33

What are teachers doing to support struggling readers access complex texts?

Bust the myth that growth of reading skills must be sequential—allow students to practice with complex texts while they get extra supports and do so by:

• Chunking the text (teach a little at a time)

• Reading text aloud while students follow along

• Slowing down, reading and re-reading

• Offering sequences of engaging questions (not explanations)

• Providing coherent sequences of texts (through gradated texts and guided reading)

• Placing a premium on stamina and persistence

• Providing support while reading rather than just before; offer extra support to students who need it

Page 34: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 34

Top Ten Actions to Take:

1. Take Complexity Inventory of what your students are reading and make adjustments

2. Conduct qualitative analyses of texts

3. Ask all students to stretch to read more complex texts—especially short texts—beyond their reading level (with supports)

4. Be thoughtful about (and focus) pre-reading

5. Re-conceptualize guided reading—place a premium on accountable independent reading ‘Both and’ Literacy Instruction K-5: A Proposed Paradigm Shift for the Common Core State Standards ELA Classroom

Page 35: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 35

Top Ten Actions to Take, cont’d.

6. Establish structures that promote a volume of reading

7. Adjust balances of texts so students have more experience with a range of informational texts

8. Build gradated text sets

9. Evidence! Evidence! Evidence! Substitute text-dependent questions for non text-dependent questions in existing materials

10. Ask students to write about everything they read

Page 36: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 36

www.achievethecore.org

Page 37: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 37

Pathways for Learning, and doing!

37

Page 38: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 38

Instructional Practice Guides

• Developmental tools for teachers and those who support teachers.

• Use the Instructional Practice Guides for:– Teacher self-reflection– Peer-to-peer observation and feedback– Instructional coaching

Page 39: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 39

Page 40: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 40

Core Actions

1. Focus each lesson on a high quality text (or multiple texts)

2. Employ questions and tasks that are text dependent and text specific

3. Provide all students with opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson

Page 41: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 41

Developmental Tools

Page 42: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 42

Instructional and Assessment Materials

Page 43: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 43

Types of Tools in the Toolkit

Type of Tool Used for Evaluating

Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET)

Comprehensive mathematics and English language arts or reading curricula in print and digital format.

EQuIP Rubric for Lessons and Units

Lesson plans and units of instruction in mathematics and English language arts/literacy.NEW: Equip Student Work Protocols

Assessment Evaluation Tool (AET)

Assessments or sets of assessments and item banks for mathematics and English language arts/literacy, including interim/benchmark assessments, and classroom assessments designed to address a grade or course.

Assessment Passage and Item Quality Criteria Checklist

Assessment passages and assessment items or tasks.

Page 44: Penn State York Literacy Alberti

PAGE 44

Resources

• http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity.html • EngageNY: K-8 lessons worth using (Core Knowledge

and Expeditionary Learning)• BAP, AAP and RAP:

– Edmodo: BAP group code: f4q6nm; AAP group code: jsv4r7; RAP group code: pkx52i

• www.achievethecore.org • “Both And” Literacy Instruction (The Libens)• InCommon (Vermont Writing Collaborative)• Mini-assessments• Assessment Evaluation Tool • Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool