penile dimensions of newborn infants

5
146 Paediatrica Indonesiana 29 : 146-150 July-August 1989 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants by M. SUTAN-ASS/N, JUSUF RUKMAN and ADRIZAL DAHLAN Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia) Abstract Of 336 fu/1-rerm, newbo rn male infanrs, penile diamerer. lengrh. and vo lume of the testis were measured. All of the infants were Indonesians. The penile stretched length was 2,86 ± 0,23 em and the diameter 0,82 ± 0,33 em. There wa tarist ica l/ y a igmfi- cant correlation between penile length and gesrafinnal age (J < 0, OJ). but no sig nif i- ca nt co rrelation et ween penile lenglh and /esticular 1 alum , body leng1h , body weight, or head circumference. Received 22nd June, 1988

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

146 Paediatrica Indonesiana 29 : 146-150 July-August 1989

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

by

M. SUTAN-ASS/N, JUSUF RUKMAN and ADRIZAL DAHLAN

Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Of 336 fu/1-rerm, newborn male infanrs, penile diamerer. lengrh. and volume of the testis were measured. All of the infants were Indonesians. The penile stretched length was 2,86 ± 0,23 em and the diameter 0,82 ± 0,33 em. There wa taristical/y a igmfi­cant correlation between penile length and gesrafinnal age (J < 0, OJ). but no signifi­cant correlation etween penile lenglh and /esticular 1 alum , body leng1h, body weight, or head circumference.

Received 22nd June, 1988

Page 2: Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

146 Paediatrica Indonesiana 29 : 146-150 July-August 1989

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

by

M. SUTAN-ASSIN, JUSUF RUKMAN and ADRIZAL DAHLAN

.r Ch 'ld Health Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Department oJ z • .

Jakarta, Jndonesta)

Abstract

l

. . 'I diameter, length. and volume of Of 336 full-term, newborn ma!e tnfanrs, plendt e esians The penile stretched length

. ed Allofthemfantswere non · . . ,. the testis were measur . . 0 82 0 ' 3 em There wa taristically a stg111J I-was 2 86 ± 0,23 em and the dwmeter ' ± ,.J . ·, ( < 0 OJ) but no signifi-

' . b 'le length and gesrauono age P , . cant con·e/atton etween pet~t d . I . •olwlte bodl' length, body weight , cant correlation between pemle length an resncu al ' , .

or head circumference.

Received 22nd June, 1988

PENILE DIMENSIONS OF NEWBORN INFANTS 147

Introduction

A clinical need for more thorough knowledge of normal variations in the size of the male genitalia has long been evident. The detection of penile size deviations from normal can facilitate the diagnosis, of endocrine disorders such as hypogonadism, micropenis, etc. (Schonfeld and Beebe, 1942).

Standards of penile size are available from newborns to adulthood (Schonfeld and Beebe, 1942; Feldman and Smith, 1975; Flatau et a!., 1975), but all predo­minantly White and Black subjects in the

USA (Feldman, 1983) and reports from Bulgaria (Troshev, 1969) and Israel (Flatau eta!., 1975).

Until now, no study has been done in Asian ancestry subjects so the assump­tion that there is little difference between Whites, Blacks and Asians might be cor­rect, but is undocumented.

The purpose of this study is to find penile size in the newborn infant in the present Indonesian population and to com­pare it with earlier reports.

Materials and Methods

Cross sectional study within a period of three months of 336 healthy fullterm male infants from Indonesian parents born in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospi­tal, Jakarta, with appropriate birth weights for gestational age (Dubowitz eta!., 1970) and without abnormalities in physical examination, comprises the subjects for this study.

They were examined between the first and third day of life in the ward for new­borns. All measurements were done by one person (AD) . The gestational age was de­termined by history and Dubowitz evalua­tion {Dubowitz et al., 1970).

Penile length in the newborn infant was measured with Schonfeld's method (Schon­feld and Beebe, 1942) from the pubic ra­mus to the tip of the glans penis by placing the end of a straight-edge ruler against the pubic ramus and applying traction along the length of the penis to the point of increased resistance. The location of the tip of the glans penis was determined by palpa-

tion. None of the infants were circumcised. Schonfeld (1942) has previously shown that stretched penile length is the most consis­tent measure of phallic length and cor­related closely with the erect penile length.

Penile diameter was determined by pas­sing the penis through a hole of a device which resembles a vertical moving sluice . The measurement was taken at the riddle of the shaft in centimeters.

Testicular volume was determined by bimanual palpation and the orchidometer

of Prader. Each measurement was done twice and

the mean was recorded. The difference bet­ween the two measurements was not more than 0, I - 0, 15 em for penile length and less than 0, I em for the width.

The gestational age, birth weight, birth length, and head circumference were noted by the regular staff of the ward.

All data were analyzed using appro­

priate statistical test.

Page 3: Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

148 M. SUTAN ASSIN ET AL

Results and Discussion

During the three-month period when thi s tudy was done, there were 362 deliveries

of fu ll -term male in fa nts. Three hundred and thirty six infant (92,8%) compri ed the subjects for this study. Twenty six infants (7,20"/o) were excluded because they did not fulfill the requirements for the study.

The mean values and ranges of the meas­urements are listed in table l.

The mean length of the penis in the

group of newborn infants was 2,86 ± 0,23 em. Feldman and Smith (1975) reported a mean penis length of 3,5 ± 0,7 em in 37 full-term male newborn infants, while Flatau a nd associates (1975) reported a mean peni length of 3,5 ± 0,4 em in 100 full-term newborn infan ts.

ln compa.dson with their data we found a statistically significant difference (p < 0,00 1) with ours.

Table l : Penile, testicular, and body measurements in 336 fullterm newborn infants

Measurement

Penile length (em)

Penile width (em)

Testicular volume (ml)

Body length (em)

Body weight (g)

Head circumference (em)

Gestational age (week)

A comparison of Schonfeld' data with our· was not po sib le because in his tudy the <ge or rhe infants wa no t the same. He incltJded a!. o infan.ts of 12 months o ld . Furthermore, T roshev ( 1969) did not de­cribe in detail the techn ique used for taking mea. urement ·, failing to mention whether or not 1 he pen i had been stretched during mea ·uring.

Thl:' calcu lated mean peni le circumfe­rence (from tile ' idtb using the equation 2 7T r; penis ' idth ~ 2r) in our series was -, 5 ± l ,OJ em, which is . maller than that rcrort cd by cho nfeld ( 1942) (3 ,6 _ 0,3

Mean ± I SO Range (Mean ± I SD)

2,86 ± 0,23 2,63 - 3,09

0,82 ± 0,33 0,49 - 1,35

1,25 ± 0,43 0,82 - 1,68

48,92 ± 1,94 46,98 - 50,86

3.246,00 ± 461,00 2.785,00 - 3.707,00

34,16 ± 1,67 32,49 - 35,83

38,58 ± 1,40 37,18 - 39,98

em), Flatau et a!. ( 1975) (3 ,3 ± 0,3 em}, again probably due 10 the difference in age with Schonfeld 's serie , a weU as in the technique or measuring with both.

There was stati rically a correlation bet­ween penile length and gestational age (r = 0 ,6078, p < 0,00 1) (Fig. I) and a weak correlation between penile length and testicular volume (r = 0,2180, p "( 0 ,00 1). No significant correlations were found bet­ween peni le length and body length, penile length and body weight, penile length a nd head circumference .

PENILE DIMENSIONS OF NEWBORN INFANTS

gestational age (week)

• •

149

r = 0,6078

Figure I : ~retched penile /e~gth of 3~6.Jull-term male infants, showing lines of mean

- 2 SD. Correlatwn coefficient to o, 6078

Clinically, micropenia may be defined as a small, but normally formed organ falling beyond 2 standard deviations from the

~ean size. Therefore, in our newborn mfants, we consider a micropenis when the length of the penis is Jess than 2,4 em.

Summary

. The penile stretched length of Indone­sian full-term newborn was 2,86 ± 0,23 em and the diameter was 0,82 ± 0,33 em. ~here was statistically a significant correla­tiOn between penile length and gestation­al age, but . not between penile length and body W~Ight, penile length and body length, pemle length and head circum-

ference.

There was statistically a significant dif­f~rence between penile length of Indone­Sian newborn infants with earlier reports from the USA (Feldman and Smith, 1975) and the Jewish Israelies (Flatau et al 1975). .,

Page 4: Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

PENILE DIMENSIONS OF NEWBORN INFANTS 149

3,6 ·' .. ,~ ,,.

Y = • 0,9902 + 0,0998 X r = 0,6078

3,4

3,2

3,0

e ~ 2,8 ..c 00 c ~

~ 2,6

·;: ... 0.

2,4

2,2

• •• •

• • •

gestational age (week)

Figure 1 Stretched penile length of 336 full-term male infants, showing lines of mean ± 2 SD. Correlation coefficient to 0,6078

Clinically, micropenia may be defined as a small, but normally formed organ falling beyond 2 standard deviations from the

mean size. Therefore, in our newborn infants, we consider a micropenis when the length of the penis is less than 2,4 em.

Summary

The penile stretched length of Indone­sian full-term newborn was 2,86 ± 0,23 em and the diameter was 0,82 ± 0,33 em. There was statistically a significant correla­tion between penile length and gestation­al age, but not between penile length and body weight, penile length and body length, penile length and head circum-

ference. There was statistically a significant dif­

ference between penile length of Indone­sian newborn infants with earlier reports from the USA (Feldman and Smith, 1975) and the Jewish Israelies (Flatau et al., 1975).

Page 5: Penile Dimensions of Newborn Infants

150 M. SUTAN ASSIN ET AL

REFERENCES

I. SCHONFELD, W.A.; BEEBE, C.W.: NormaJ growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturrty. J . Urol. 48: 759-777 (1942).

2. FELDMAN, K.W.; SMITH, D.W.: Fetal phallic growth and penile standards for newborn male infants. J . Pediat. 86 : 395-398 (1975) .

3. FLATAU, E.; JOSEFSBERG, Z.; REISNER, S.H.; BIALfK, 0 .; LA RON, Z.: Penile size in the newborn infant. J . Pediat. 87 : 663-664 (1975).

4. FELDMAN, K.W.: Personal communication (1983).

5. TROSHEV, K.: Contribution to the anthro­pometric study nf the penis in a group of Bul­garian ooys rrom binh to tne age of seven years . Acta Chir. plast. 11 : 140 (1969).

6. DUBOWJTZ, L.M.S.; DUBOWITZ, V. ; GOLS­BERG, C.: Clinical assesment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J . Pediat. 77 : 1- 10 (1970).