pei201604-dl

Upload: josetxox

Post on 01-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    1/52

    Gas &Steam

    Turbine

    The magazine for the international power industry April 2016

    www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Special Focus

    THE DANGERS OF GASTURBINE MULTI-STARTS

    STEAM TURBINES: NEWTRENDS & INNOVATION

    DRY AIR INJECTION TORAISE FUEL EFFICIENCY

    HOW TO PICK THE BESTFILTRATION SYSTEM

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=Cover&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    2/52

    A new generation is born

    www.ansaldoenergia.com

    New products.

    New technologies.

    New service capabilities.

    Ansaldo Energia: a global player

    in the power generation market.

    02/2

    01

    et

    gra

    r

    For more information, enter 1 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=C2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=C2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ansaldoenergia.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    3/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 1

    POWER ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL

    Contents

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Credit: xxx

    Free Product InfoYou can request product and service information from this issue. Simply click on the link below that will provide you access to supplier companies websites,

    product information and more http://pei.hotims.com

    If you are considering suppliers or buying products you read about in PEi, please use this service. It gives us an idea of how products are being received to help us continually

    improve our editorial offering and it also lets our advertisers know that you are a PEi reader and helps them to continue supporting the free distribution of your magazine.

    Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    Get the latest gas and steam turbine specifications from the OEMs: p22

    Credit: Siemens48 Ad Index

    On the cover

    Cover design: Samantha Heasmer. Images courtesy of Ansaldo, GE and Siemens.

    APRIL 2016///VOLUME 24///ISSUE 4

    Features

    2 Advances in steam turbine technology

    Central to the future of thermal power plants is the steamturbine, and its manufacturers are focussing on improving

    the design and performance of these machines.

    10 The risk of start-stops to gas turbines

    The increasing requirement for gas turbine multi-starts couldseriously injure your assets.

    12 Boosting gas turbines with dry air injection

    A demonstration project in Saudi Arabia has installed a dry

    air injection system upgrade to improve fuel efficiency.

    18 The cost of ineffective filtration

    What filtration factors need to be considered to optimizeturbine efficiency and reduce maintenance frequency.

    Gas & Steam Turbine Directory

    22 Gas & Steam Turbine Technical Specifications

    33 Products and Services Listings

    38 Company Listings

    Coming up in Mays issue

    POWER-GEN Europe issue

    Optimizing gas engine performance

    Emissions control: meeting new European regulations

    Piping and the European Pressure Equipment Directive

    The way forward for energy storage

    Are SMRs the future of nuclear in Europe?

    Solar power in the Russian Federation

    Inside two new cutting-edge gas-fired plantsPOWER-GEN Europe preview and highlights

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=1&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=1&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    4/522 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Steam turbines

    Advancing steamturbine technology

    David Appleyard looks at how steam turbine manufacturers are focusing onimproving the design and performance of their machines.

    Renewables may have struck a

    decisive lead in new worldwide

    power capacity investment, but

    King Coal is still to be dethroned.

    Indeed, according to GE, coal

    still represents nearly 30 per cent

    of global energy consumption its highest

    share since 1970 and provides 40 per cent

    of the worlds electricity. While this number is

    expected to fall, coal will remain the backbone

    of the power system in many countries.

    Consequently, the global steam turbine

    market is projected by some analysts to growfrom an estimated $12,872.5 million in 2015 to

    some $19,292 million by 2020.

    Trevor Bailey, General Manager of Steam

    Power Systems at GE, comments: Coal is still

    around and will be around for some time

    in certain parts of the world where its the

    most readily available fuel. We need to find

    responsible, environmentally friendly ways of

    using that fuel.

    With the drive to improve environmental

    performance across the power

    generation sector, manufacturers of key

    electromechanical equipment are under

    pressure to improve energy efficiency, but

    in a competitive market operations and

    maintenance considerations are always high

    on the agenda. In the case of coal-fired or

    other thermal plant, the steam turbine is one

    principal area of focus for the major OEMs.

    Predicting operational integrity

    Jiri Fiala, Director of R&D at Doosan Skoda

    based in the Czech Republic, emphasizes the

    role of detailed knowledge of a steam turbine

    in improving plant performance: First, what is

    important for the operator? It is important to

    have a good picture of the turbine cycle. It

    means information and this is measurementconnected with the control system. On the

    other hand, we can offer a remote monitoring

    system which means that we are always

    connected online and we are able also to

    advise the plant operator.

    Fiala explains how such a system can

    support plant operations: We are asked by

    our clients that their turbines should be able to

    operate without a major overhaul for maybe

    ten years or eight years. Our answer is yes, but

    it is necessary also to take into account the

    correct operation of the turbine. For example,

    the purity of the steam as mechanical

    impurities can damage some surfaces of th=e

    flow path can damage some glands and

    seals. If the chemical purity of the steam is poor,

    there can also be wear on the rotor blades

    which can be, after some time, damaged by

    chemical effects on the material.

    We are able to extend the period

    between service intervals, but it is necessary

    for the operator to comply with some

    recommendations to keep the purity of the

    steam within some limits.

    This is a point picked up by Bailey: Theres

    an element of erosion from the continuous

    flow of steam through the steam turbine that,

    over many years, does have some impact,particularly on the longer blades. The last

    stage or the low pressure section of the

    turbine, for example, can experience some

    heavy erosion.

    Theres also a mechanical integrity

    element to this, making sure the rotating

    equipment is operating safely and that it is

    capable of operating over extended periods

    of time, as many power plants are operating

    way beyond their original design life.

    Making life assessment studies and

    making sure the equipment is safe to operate

    is another part of the service portfolio.

    He continues: Having that deep domain

    knowledge around how the machine is

    Steam turbines are central to the future of thermal power plant

    Credit: Siemens

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    5/52

    www.pasquick.com

    What keeps asset owners one layer aheadwhen meeting budget targets?

    As a leading global supplier of polymer solutions in the chemical industry,we lay the ground for a true game changer in corrosion protection. Its

    comes to budget control for the protection of industrial facilities, What can we invent for you?

    COST SAVINGS

    CovestroDeutschlandAG

    ,D-

    51365Leverkusen

    COV00080145

    For more information, enter 2 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=3&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=3&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pasquick.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    6/524 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Steam turbines

    designed, how the materials are incorporated

    in the different parts of the rotating equipment,

    and being able to apply that to predict

    what remains of the in-service life of a piece

    of equipment is a core competency and

    obviously we use that extensively.

    Were constantly, through our monitoring

    centres, gathering data and understanding

    trends on different fleets so we can start

    to predict failures on families of machines

    and therefore make that less traumatic for

    customers, because we can step in and

    advise them of the high probability of a failure

    in this operating mode.

    Predictive maintenance is a very

    important dimension, especially on

    equipment thats running. Its got a design

    life of 30+ years and could be running longer

    than that, and as we move more into the

    industrial digital environment were able to use

    digital applications to help customers operate

    their plant more efficiently, preventing forced

    outages by having more innovative, predictive

    maintenance and monitoring approaches.

    Dr Lutz Voelker, responsible for the Research

    and Development of Industrial Steam Turbines

    at Siemens, also emphasizes the importanceof long-term predictability: Material is one

    of the key elements in the design and it is

    important to know its behaviour after ten, 15,

    25 years of operation.

    If you have a better understanding of the

    long-term behaviour of the material, you can

    apply this knowledge to the design philosophy.

    So if you have, in the past, used very heavy

    construction due to uncertainties in the long-

    term behaviour, now with new knowledge of

    the materials behaviour you can optimize

    the design by wall thicknesses and main

    dimensions reduction, keeping same safety

    margins, as you know exactly what will happen

    after 20 or 25 years of operation.

    We can, for example, improve the design

    philosophy, make the turbine lighter in total

    weight, and extend the application range

    and operational behaviour of the technology.

    Voelker adds: To improve operational

    availability further, Siemens offers a remote

    monitoring system which allows tracking

    of some key values of the turbine. Based

    on knowledge over its lifetime, customers

    can get direct feedback as to whether the

    defined turbine overhauls are required or if the

    operation can be extended.

    Changing operational profiles

    Noting the changing demand profile for

    thermal plant operation in many markets as a

    result of increasing volumes of variable output

    renewables, Voelker highlights another trend

    in steam turbine development: Flexibility and

    customization. That means fast startup times

    or unlimited load changes while in operation

    to act on and support stronger green power

    generation. Steam units are not making base

    load as in the past. Further, steam turbines

    used in combination with green power

    generation such as solar plants must fulfil the

    special demands of this application. To bestill successful with steam turbines, we have

    to follow these new market requirements for

    operation.

    Fiala also notes the changing marketplace:

    Demands to improve partial load operation

    or fluctuations in demand have risen in recent

    years, for example in Europe where there

    are increasing volumes of variable-output

    renewable energy such as photovoltaics.

    Equipment connected to the inlet parts

    of the turbine will enable higher power output

    and also very high efficiency on lower power

    operation, very good dynamic efficiency.

    Increasing ramp-up rates and shortening

    startup procedures or startup times, for

    example increasing the number of starts,

    is a typical request from, for example, solar

    power plants which every day start and

    stop the turbines. This requires changes andmodifications to the design, mainly on the

    rotor part to reduce concentration of the

    stresses on the rotor, to enable the rotor to start

    very rapidly if the number of starts and stops

    for the application is very, very high.

    It is possible to do this, but with some

    special design provisions. Measuring the

    temperature close to rotor or some stator parts,

    and using some evaluation in the control

    system, you can calculate the temperature

    on the surfaces of the turbine and inside

    the rotor. Based on this knowledge, you can

    change or evaluate the startup procedure to

    maintain limits within a safe area. Above this

    limit, definitely the lifetime of the material will

    expire very fast.

    He adds: On the other hand, the control

    system can take all this information and

    evaluate, lets say, a residual lifetime of the

    rotor.

    Voelker: It is an improvement based on the

    latest developments in the flow path of the

    design.

    Sealing and steam pathIn addition to improving predictability in

    various operational modes, improvements

    also cover the various sealing systems within

    the machine and steam path to boost thermal

    efficiency for example, the introduction of

    abradable materials for the sealing concept

    or brush steel technologies to improve the

    efficiency and the internal performance.

    As Ronald Schmidt, responsible for the

    industrial steam turbines business segment

    at Siemens, explains: We had a very robust

    blading path design in the past. It wasefficient but not as good compared to what

    we saw in the big steam units, but for different

    applications we have now introduced highly

    sophisticated blade path designs which are

    normally used for the big steam units, and

    in the 3DV blading which is a lean sweep

    blade path design with an improved sealing

    geometry that means more sealing strips per

    blade row to cover or reduce the leakages.

    Applying expertise derived from other

    areas of business is also a key consideration for

    GE, as Bailey observes: GE acquired Alstoms

    power generation and grid businesses late

    last year, and one area where we do have

    significant overlap is around steam turbine

    Detailed knowledge of a steam turbine can improve plant performance

    Credit: Doosan Skoda Power

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=4&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    7/52

    Integrated Power Generation Solutions

    Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe supplies up-to-date,

    efficient products. We construct most modern power plants.

    And we deliver reliable and cost-effective service solutions.

    Our green technologies in energy storage and biomass,

    for instance are examples for our innovation capabilities.

    Intelligent power generation solutions require know-how and

    experience. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems has them

    both making us a globally successful energy plant constructor

    and service provider. www.eu.mhps.com

    Joint Forces

    21 23 June 2016

    MiCo Milano,

    Milan, ItalyVisit us at stand 3HD82

    For more information, enter 3 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=5&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=5&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eu.mhps.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    8/526 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    technology. Thats actually provided us

    with the opportunity to look at two ways of

    addressing how best to provide the most

    efficient steam turbines to make best use of all

    these fuels, and we are now actively looking at

    the technologies that are available to us.

    GE has historically been a wheel-and-

    diaphragm-type architecture, more an

    impulse steam turbine, although in recent

    years with HEAT (High Efficiency Advanced

    Technology), primarily used in combined

    cycles, the firm has moved more into high

    reaction-type architectures. Alstom has a mix

    of technologies coming from both camps.

    And, as Bailey notes, one area of

    development is in the area of sealing within

    the steam turbine: We have a mix of sealing

    technology thats applied to different places

    on the steam turbine: brush seals, traditional

    labyrinth seals, abradable-type seals. With the

    combination of Alstom and GE technologies,

    we now have a broad range of sealing

    capability that can be used across all of these

    applications, and that can vary depending

    on the mission that the

    steam turbine has to

    operate within.

    If youre in

    combined cycle

    where the machine

    may be operating for

    prolonged periods

    at part load or could

    be stopping and

    starting every day, the

    sealing technologies

    can be different to a

    machine like a nuclear

    application where itsmore a baseload-type

    application.

    Bailey concludes:

    From a GE point of

    view, a lot of sealing

    technology for rotating

    equipment has flowed

    down from our aviation

    and gas turbine

    capabilities and is

    now being applied in

    a steam environment.

    Alstom obviously

    comes at that from

    a different direction,

    looking at it from a steam turbine point of

    view from the outset. Were going through that

    process of learning from each other and being

    able to draw upon the best technologies andlooking at the operating experiences from

    both companies. I think there are going to be

    some exciting developments as our engineers

    really get to grips with what we now have

    available to us.

    Improving steam condition

    One well-known route to improving the thermal

    efficiency of power plant systems is to boost

    the temperature and pressure characteristics

    of the steam.

    Bailey says: Operating steam temperatures

    we continue to push. Were operating at

    600C live steam inlet conditions, pushing re-

    heat temperatures further, and that means

    materials development continues, obviously

    pushing 650C inlet temperature and longer-

    term to 700C, potentially beyond that even.

    A number of programmes are in place

    to drive materials development, which

    GE is actively engaged in, along with the

    production techniques required.

    Its not something that will change

    dramatically, its a more evolutionary process.

    From a steam turbine point of view its not such

    a big challenge; other components such as

    boilers and some of the interconnecting

    pipe work actually are somewhat more

    challenging from a materials point of view. We

    could move to higher temperatures now with

    a steam turbine, but youve got to bring the

    rest of the power plant with it.

    Nonetheless, GE has revealed a

    breakthrough in re-heat technology.

    An area that is of interest to us is around

    double re-heat technology. In the past, large

    coal power generation has been based ona single re-heat Rankine cycle. Were looking

    at technologies now where we can take two

    re-heat cycles back to the boiler and pass it

    through a second intermediate turbine, which

    gives us a significant efficiency boost, says

    Bailey.

    Were pushing the materials capability

    that we have available to us too. Were using

    proven technology with a slightly different

    steam cycle. It delivers a significant boost

    in cycle efficiency in excess of 1 per cent in

    overall net power plant efficiency. Were calling

    it LE2 Leading Efficiency, Lower Emissions as

    clean-as-it-can-be power generation using

    solid fossil fuels.

    Steam turbines

    www.cd-adapco.com

    [email protected]

    COMBUSTORSGAS TURBINES

    GENERATORSCOMPRESSORS

    DISCOVER BETTER DESIGNS. FASTER.

    MULTIDISCIPLINARY SIMULATION FOR CLEAN, EFFICIENT ENERGY AND

    ECONOMICAL, RELIABLE POWER

    The RDK8 single re-heat plant in Karlsruhe, Germany

    Credit: EnBW AG

    For more information, enter 4 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=mailto%3Ainfo%40cd-adapco.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cd-adapco.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    9/52

    Steam turbines

    The double re-heat cycle follows on from

    the operating experience of the worlds most

    efficient single re-heat power plant at the RDK8

    installation in Germany. GE says the plant atthe Rheinhafen-Dampfkraftwerk facility in

    Karlsruhe has achieved 47.5 per cent net

    thermal efficiency while producing 912 MWe.

    If you looked at a double re-heat in the

    same location as RDK8, it would be in the

    range of 49.5 per cent plus net power plant

    efficiency, says Bailey.

    Doosans Fiala also picks up on the push

    towards 700C steam. We have in operation

    ultra-supercritical turbines which operate at

    about 600C. High steam parameters mean

    high efficiency and 600C is fairly typical. On

    the other hand, many companies, including us,

    are thinking about 700C. For 700C conditions

    we have prepared some materials for the rotor,

    components welded from several parts. We

    have done some tests on this welding process

    and are developing some components for this

    700C plant, which we suppose is the future.

    Of course, that will depend on the cost or the

    price of the electricity because everything

    should be calculated economically, and

    higher parameters also mean higher cost or

    higher investment, so everything should have

    sufficient payback.

    There are supply chain considerations too,as Fiala says: 600C conditions are common

    in the market so that is why, for example,

    P92 material for the casting or hot casting

    or main pipelines is available. On the other

    hand, when we speak about 700C then it is

    necessary to speak about alternatives such as

    nymonic alloy or chromium alloy combination

    of the rotor. This is not an easy task and that is

    why, over the last two, two and a half years we

    have developed such a welding procedure. It

    does also depend on the supplier because

    we can develop some welding procedures

    or heat treatment procedures but we need to

    buy good quality forgings.

    Siemens is also extending turbine steam

    conditions for industrial steam turbines: With

    the enhanced platform, we have increased

    the lasting capability for our building block

    system, which now goes up to a maximum of

    565C, 180 bar pressure level for continuous

    operation. Compared to the former design,

    that is an improvement of 25 Kelvin higher

    temperature and roughly 40 bar higher

    pressure level, says Voelker.

    He adds: For the area of industrial units

    we are not considering actual 700C steamconditions. The industry is currently focussed

    in the area of 560C580C as we see no

    benefit in improving or increasing live steam

    conditions on industrial units. If you are talking

    about higher live steam conditions, then it

    goes more in the direction of the big steam

    and CCPP units. Big steam is at the level

    of 600C, 280 bar and CCPP at the level of

    600C, 177 bar that we already have in the

    field. Especially for CCPP, Siemens is working to

    increase the live steam conditions further.

    New manufacturing techniques

    One further trend concerns the use of novel

    manufacturing technologies to reduce lead

    time and costs.

    Schmidt says: I believe what is next on

    the operations side of manufacturing is the

    full digitalization chain, which we are working

    on. Obviously R&D gives us a very flexible

    product with lots of alterations possible for the

    specific customer order. Unfortunately, from a

    For more information, enter 5 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=mailto%3Aprotective%40hempel.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpowergen.hempel.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    10/528 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    manufacturing perspective, the one-off which

    this creates in terms of manufacturing is the

    challenge we have to manage.

    We believe the digitization initiative we

    are running there will give us a little bit of

    an edge as well. The concept really is that

    when R&D designs, lets take a casing as an

    example, they provide their particular design;

    this is altered to the customer-specific order in

    our customer order engineering team, and

    then this creates a 3D model, which is then

    submitted to the supplier which casts the part.

    The difficult portion is really that we

    need to know the as-is dimensions for the

    next manufacturing step. The vendor, in this

    case the casting house, provides the as-is model and this is then submitted to the

    manufacturing team in Goerlitz, and while

    the transportation is being done from China

    or wherever the vendor is located, we can

    prepare manufacturing of the part already

    with the as-is dimensions of the scanned

    part we received from the supply base. Then

    we can optimize manufacturing technology

    with the blades. In the end we simulate the

    manufacturing of the part, so when the actual

    part arrives in the plant we can immediately

    start machining without spending a lot of time

    on setup.

    We will have an optimized programming of

    the machine, and the results are documented

    electronically as well. So if we go to a unit that

    is running in the field, we know immediately

    what the dimensions are because we have

    the electronic models, and then we can

    service the unit much better going forward.

    Its the 3D model of the components, the

    simulation of the process and the machine

    tool itself, these three

    things need to be

    brought together,

    really, to do this in a

    concurrent way rather

    than sequential.

    Schmidt also

    notes the use of

    laser sintering in

    the manufacture of

    components from the

    gas turbine arena: We

    do use 3D printing,

    but for various gas

    turbine components.For steam turbines we

    utilize this technology

    rather in the area of

    machining fixtures. We

    need very variable

    parts so the fixtures

    need to be variable as

    well, and if you do that

    in metal all the time it

    is very costly and takes

    quite a long time. Now

    you do the stimulation

    of the part, then you

    print the insert for the

    machining fixture. This

    is a specific example where 3D printing helps

    to save costs and gain time.

    He concludes, though: In the steam

    turbine unit, laser sintering doesnt seem to bethat attractive at the present moment, first and

    foremost because of cost.

    The cost issue is also noted by Fiala: Of

    course there could be a use of some different

    up-to-date technology for some components,

    such as laser sintering, but definitely I think,

    for example, gas turbines which use higher

    temperatures are a different story. Steam

    turbines are more or less conservative:

    definitely we use some special materials, but

    typically smaller rather than big components

    I mean, for example, some sealing parts

    because new techniques or technologies

    usually are also more costly, so that is why we

    need to evaluate the cost of the material and

    manufacturing.

    In the future, for example, there will be some

    3-D printing mainly for small components, but

    maybe not always for small components.

    He adds: There are also some standard

    procedures with some scope for improvement

    of the surface, for example hardening of the

    inlet stages of the last or last-but-one stages,

    which operate in wet steam to improve erosion

    protection.

    Future turbine developments

    Looking ahead, Voelker suggests further

    improvements in performance are anticipated:

    What we are working on currently is, of course,

    some further improvements in efficiency, and

    strong interest and activity in the field of further

    development in the last stage blading area.

    That is one key component in the overall steam

    unit, to reach higher performance levels.

    In mid-2015 Siemens also delivered a steam

    turbine that operates almost entirely withoutlubricants, with the bearing systems consisting

    of air-cooled, active electromagnetic bearings.

    The first 10 MW turbine equipped with

    magnetic bearings was installed at Vattenfalls

    lignite-fired Jnschwalde steam power plant

    in the German state of Brandenburg.

    Voelker concludes:We believe that flexibility,

    going forward, is key in both dimensions: cost

    and efficiency. That needs to be supported as

    well by a flexible manufacturing system.

    David Appleyard is a freelance journalist

    Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    for more information

    Steam turbines

    FEATURING: Steam Turbine Generator Additional Fuel Intake System Dust Suppression Transformers and Switch Gear Wood Pellet Hammer Mills Mobile Plant and Vehicles Circuit Breaker and Relays Air Compressors A substantial quantity of Turbine spares

    including spare LP, HP and IP rotors

    For further information, contact:

    LEIGH MCCARRONTelephone: +44 (0) 7901 [email protected]

    LOCATION: Ironbridge, Shropshire, United Kingdom

    EQUIPMENT FROM THECLOSURE OF IRONBRIDGE

    POWER STATION

    SALE

    COMPLETE CONVERSION TO BIOMASS

    FUEL IN 2013 BY DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS

    To view and bid on the lots, please visit:

    http://www.go-dove.com/en/events?cmd=details&event=561141

    PRIVATETREATYOn the instructions ofUniper UK Ltd

    Machine Shop, Spare Parts andAccessories Equipment

    Conveyors, Hoppers, Silos, Tanksand other Transfer Equipment

    Gantry Cranes Railway Lines Water Treatment Plant and Large

    Capacity Water Pumps

    More Power Generation Assetscoming available during 2016.

    The RDK8 steam turbine

    Credit: EnBW AG

    For more information, enter 6 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.go-dove.com%2Fen%2Fevents%3Fcmd%3Ddetails%26event%3D561141http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=mailto%3Aleigh.mccarron%40liquidityservices.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    11/52

    The industry-proven GE5 gas turbine has

    evolved into the new NovaLT5 with design

    advances from our highly successful NovaLT16

    development program.

    NovaLT5 delivers 5.6 MW with 31% efficiency,

    24,000 hours MTBM and significantly lower

    operating and maintenance costs. The compact

    package is excellent for a wide range of powergeneration applications, and its high exhaust

    temperature makes it an ideal solution for

    cogeneration.

    geoilandgas.com/NovaLT5

    BIGDEALFOR SMALLPOWER

    GEN

    For more information, enter 7 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=9&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=9&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fgeoilandgas.com%2FNovaLT5
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    12/5210 www.PowerEngineeringInt.comPower Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    Gas turbine maintenance

    The growing need for multi-starts could seriously injure your assets, says Gary Lock

    A

    s the energy industry

    increases its uptake of

    power from renewables,

    the level of demand on

    large frame gas turbines

    becomes less predictable,

    with start-ups triggered by the vagaries of the

    weather and the economic market.

    Gas turbine operators are having to multi-

    start machines, sometimes as often as twice

    a day. Indeed, multi-starting has become

    the norm it is common to hear of over 500

    starts a year with superfast ramp-up periods.

    What damage is this causing to machines

    that were designed, effectively, for continuous

    operation? And what might be the resulting

    risks and cost implications for the industry?

    Gas turbines were initially designed tofacilitate base loading with minimal starts but

    with industry changes, multi-starting is putting

    high-integrity components through multiple

    strain cycles for which they were not designed.

    Making assumptions that components can

    withstand these requirements based on

    the generalization that a defined number of

    starts is equivalent to a particular number of

    operating hours is at best optimistic, and at

    worst could be dangerous.

    A key change in the impact on

    components is that, in traditional use, the

    dominant failure process for hot components

    was creep. They were thus designed using

    creep-resistant alloys and their stresses were

    controlled appropriately. In the new era of

    multi-starts, the components experience

    high thermal transients during startup, and

    this, together with ever-shortening ramp-up

    times and increasing operating cycles, has a

    significant detrimental effect on their integrity.

    Multi-starts mean the stressed components

    in gas turbines are now subjected to low

    cycle fatigue and, for many, this becomes the

    dominant failure criterion. Hot components

    have the added problem of creep, as outlined

    above. This, when combined with low cycle

    fatigue, can reduce the component lifespan

    dramatically below that expected of each

    of these failure criteria in isolation. Historically,

    assessing low-cycle fatigue damage has been

    problematic. While inspection and evaluation

    of creep damage is fairly straightforward, forlow-cycle fatigue analytical methods provide

    the most effective way of knowing the extent

    of life remaining in a component.

    The difficulty in assessing low-cycle fatigue

    damage lies in the physical differences

    between the characteristics of creep failure

    and low-cycle fatigue during the strain cycle.

    In creep failure, materials develop defects

    in features such as grain boundaries, over

    time and under the application of steady

    stresses and temperatures, due to the

    gradual accumulation of strain by diffusional

    processes. Creep-resistant materials are

    developed with large-grain structures to

    minimize the potential for the onset and

    accumulation of damage, which generally

    appears at the grain boundaries.

    Low-cycle fatigue, in comparison, is

    characterized by the accumulation of micro-

    cracks, which appear in regions of high strain.

    These micro-cracks then coalesce to form

    large cracks and these can propagate quickly

    through the grain structure. Low-cycle fatigue-

    resistant materials are typically developed

    with small grain structures to cut the potential

    for crack growth in any given cycle.

    Analysis typically focuses on up to

    ten components where, should they fail

    prematurely, a safety-critical or financially

    unacceptable impact would result. Each

    component is modelled using a Finite Element

    Model (FEM), which accurately represents

    its geometry, its interaction with matingcomponents, and its load cycles. The FEM

    model is then subjected to startup, steady

    state, and cool-down cycles of thermal and

    mechanical loads, and the results measured.

    Typically, the models are non-linear to enable

    them to accurately represent the gaps, friction

    and material yield and creep deformation that

    generally occur in hot gas path components.

    Post-processing of the resulting strain cycle

    produces a calculation of the damage

    accumulated during each cycle type.

    Methods for calculating the damage differ

    depending on the material, and are based

    on either ductility exhaustion or strain energy

    density. For ductility exhaustion, its essential

    Turbine trauma:the riskof the start-stop cycle

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=10&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    13/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 11Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    Gas turbine maintenance

    that we understand the dependence of the

    materials ductility on complex variables,

    including strain rate and temperature.

    Alloys, for example, will usually have greaterductility at high strain rates than at low strain

    rates. Thus, whether strains occur during long

    periods of constant load or during loading

    cycles will affect the damage calculation. The

    available ductility of the material is gradually

    used up as the strain accumulates during a

    constant load period or a start/stop cycle,

    until eventually it is fully exhausted.

    Similarly, strain energy density-based

    methods will calculate the work undertaken

    by the material each time it goes through a

    load cycle. From this analysis we can develop

    a detailed understanding of how damage

    accumulates during varying load cycles and

    periods of constant load. This, in turn, provides

    us with significant insights into, and a deeper

    understanding of, the effects that result from

    different operating regimes.

    With analysis demonstrating the low-cycle

    fatigue and creep stresses that multi-starts

    impose upon components, and the resulting

    impact that this has on their lifespan, this poses

    several issues for operators. The first is the need

    to be aware of the damage taking place, so

    that regular inspection, maintenance and

    replacement can be factored into assetmanagement strategies and schedules.

    Consideration of the bigger picture,

    however, poses a more complex question:

    Are multi-starts cost-effective do the overall

    financial benefits really outweigh the costs of

    regularly ramping up the turbines so quickly?

    Taking the damage that is being caused to

    assets together with associated costs such

    as time lost to equipment shutdowns and

    time spent in repair activity by staff into

    consideration, an operators apparent profit

    could be significantly eroded.

    Of course, apart from the financial aspects,

    operators must consider the potential health

    and safety implications of asset damage.

    As component stresses begin to occur,

    the possibility of a premature catastrophic

    equipment failure increases. These failures

    might involve blades, veins or even discs, and

    could cause both internal damage to the

    turbine and damage to surrounding areas.

    Thus the problem facing industrial gas

    turbines is clear. Designed for creep resistance,

    using creep-resistant materials suitable for

    machines which base load with minimal

    start/stop cycles, the introduction of severefatigue cycles into the mix poses a significant

    challenge to their long-term health.

    It is imperative that operators recognize

    that gas turbine multi-starts may be resulting

    in more damage than they are aware of. This

    knowledge may then need to be taken into

    account when considering the electricity

    price at which generation is economical.

    With the challenges already facing the

    energy market, the issue of asset damage

    due to multi-starts needs to be considered by

    both operators and governments to ensure

    that generators are not disadvantaged. With

    the need for flexibility in energy provision, gas

    turbine generation must remain viable.

    Gary Lockis Senior Business Manager at

    Frazer-Nash Consultancy.

    www.fnc.co.uk

    Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    for more information

    Effective Damping

    Control vibrations and shiftcritical speeds with ISFDtechnology, an integralsqueeze film damper.

    Long-Lasting Seals

    Minimize leakage gaps withcustom and reverse engineeredbrush seal solutions.

    Optimized Bearing Designs

    Reduce power loss, increaseload capacity and achievesuperior dynamic performancewith specialized thrust andjournal bearings.

    Choose Waukesha Bearingsfor performance you can trust.

    www.waukeshabearings.com/TurbineSolutions

    For more information, enter 8 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.waukeshabearings.com%2FTurbineSolutionshttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fnc.co.ukhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    14/5212 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Retrofits & upgrades

    Improving gas

    turbine performancewith dry air injectionIn the Middle East, gas turbine efficiency at high ambient temperatures is crucial. Ademonstration project in Saudi Arabia installed a dry air injection system upgrade

    with the aim of improving fuel efficiency, writes Tildy Bayar

    Demand for fuel oil for power

    generation during a Saudi

    Arabian summer reaches

    between 420,000 and

    430,000 barrels per day.

    With 58 per cent of global

    use, the nation is the worlds largest user of

    crude oil for generating power. Iraq, Kuwait

    and the UAE were ranked third, fourth and

    fifth respectively; together with Saudi Arabia,

    these countries account for almost 80 per

    cent of the crude oil that is burned for power

    generation worldwide.One company says it can potentially offer

    gas turbine-based power generators savings

    of over 18 million barrels of oil equivalent (or

    a 5 per cent fuel efficiency improvement) per

    year through its dry air injection system.

    Powerphase, with offices in Florida

    and Dubai, has one such system, called

    Turbophase, installed at a cogeneration

    plant in the US. The Morris Cogen plant, which

    came online in 1997, is a 177 MW combined-

    cycle facility featuring three GE Frame 6B gas

    turbines with HRSGs, and a 60 MW steam

    turbine. It supplies power and process steam

    for a large ethylene manufacturing plant near

    Chicago, Illinois. Two Turbophase modules

    have been operational at Morris Cogen since

    September 2014 and have accumulated over

    2000 hours of operation.

    In late summer 2015, Powerphase installed

    its first Turbophase upgrade in the Middle

    East on an operational GE 7FA gas turbine.

    The company says it installed the upgrade in

    four months in order to meet the customers

    summer peak load requirements.

    Technology configuration

    In simple or combined cycle applications the

    skid-mounted Turbophase system consists ofan air compressor driven by a reciprocating

    engine and a heat recovery system which

    captures the engines exhaust heat and adds

    it to the compressor discharge, enabling the

    system to match the turbines compressor

    discharge temperature.

    On combined cycle and cogeneration

    systems, the module can be configured with

    a steam turbine drive for the air compressor

    which enables zero incremental air emissions

    and, Powerphase says, helps improve output

    from plants which are facing limits on the air

    cooled condensers for the steam turbine.

    The Turbophase system takes advantage

    of the fact that all gas turbines loser power

    as ambient temperatures or elevations rise,

    explains Bob Kraft, Powerphase president and

    chief executive. The system adds the air that

    is naturally missing back into the turbine. The

    air is injected into one or more of the existing

    ports, typically about 5 per cent air, which

    results in 10 per cent more turbine power.

    We are the first commercial air injection

    system available on market, he adds, and for

    the next 18 to 20 years we expect to be the

    only one because of our patent portfolio.

    In the Middle East, he notes, chillers are

    competitive with the Turbophase system.Chillers effectively cool the gas turbine inlet

    to allow it to generate additional mass flow,

    whereas we just generate it with an auxiliary

    gas-driven module and drive the air into the

    turbine. We do something similar but in a

    much different way, and the big difference is

    that we generate that air between 30 and 40

    per cent more efficiently than the turbine can

    generate its own air.

    Chillers store cold water for 16 or 18 hours

    a day, using the turbines to run an electricity-

    driven chilling process. During six peak

    daytime hours, the chillers cycle cold water

    from a cold tank to a hot tank through the

    turbines inlet to produce additional power. In

    The Turbophase dry air injection system

    Credit: Powerphase

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=12&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    15/52

    WWW.PWPS.COM

    D O W N T I M E I S N O T A N O P T I O N .

    WE DELIVER POWER.

    For more information, enter 9 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=13&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=13&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2FWWW.PWPS.COM
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    16/5214 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Retrofits & upgrades

    contrast, Kraft says a Turbophase unit can run

    24/7. The chiller is running harder at night to

    do the storage process and only gets auxiliary

    power during the day. The customer generates

    about six times the revenue stream with our

    system compared to a chiller system.

    New aeroderivative gas turbines are also

    competitive. These units suffer similar output

    reductions due to high ambient temperatures.

    Turbophase mitigates, and in some cases

    eliminates, the need to install new peaking

    gas turbines by providing an alternative at

    much better fuel efficiency, Kraft says.

    And, he adds, the Turbophase system has

    other advantages. Especially in the Middle

    East, maintenance is expensive so they try

    to drag out their outage intervals. With our

    system you get the extra power at the same

    internal temperatures to the turbine, so you

    dont affect whats going on there. If you dont

    need the extra power, if youre operating at

    base or part load, you can still use our air in

    the system to get the efficiency improvement

    but youll also get a secondary benefit: parts

    life extensions.

    For big companies in the US, this can push

    their outage interval from basically a 24,000-

    hour interval, which is the normal interval

    OEMs offer today, to adding an additional year

    or so, from 8000 hours to 32,000 hours. Take a

    $5 million outage: instead of every three years

    you can do it every four years, and youve

    avoided lost revenue from the downtime.

    Project specifications

    The installation in Saudi Arabia was designed

    to demonstrate the Turbophase systems

    performance at high ambient temperatures.

    The project was operational between mid-July

    and early October 2015.

    Powerphase requested any F-class units

    for the installation of its system, and a GE-

    MS7001FA-(7FA.03) gas turbine was selected.

    Depending on the vintage of the turbine,

    Kraft says, a B-class GT, whether a GE, Siemens,

    Mitsubishi, those were developed and

    delivered in the 1960s and 70s. In the 70s and

    80s there was the E-class; the next generation

    of GTs out there in significant quantity are the

    D and E classes. In the 90s the F class came

    out, and now in the 2010 frame and above,

    the H and J class. Those GTs basically have

    an increased firing temperature, which is the

    temperature that the GT inlet sees.

    The efficiency of the GT and the CCGT are

    directly proportional to the firing temperature.

    So basically, for every unit of air that the GT

    pumps through it with the compressor, it

    makes more power in the turbine and steam

    turbine with the elevated firing temperature.

    The reason we like the F-class units is

    because they are today considered mature-

    frame GTs, so there are a lot of competitors

    out there supplying parts and services

    and customers are used to operating and

    maintaining those GTs. So we can sell a

    third-party product to them and they feel

    comfortable putting it on.

    Our box works on every GT on the planet,

    but on those B-class machines it might make

    3 MW per box whereas on a J machine it

    will make 6 MW per box with the same fuel

    consumption and air output.

    On more advanced frames you will see

    some of the OEMs offering our equipment.

    This business works nicely with OEM offerings.

    It could be viewed as a competitive product

    because OEMs like to upgrade their GTs,

    however its such a unique product and we

    see OEMs moving towards putting it on their

    engines, either in new or existing offerings, onboth mature and advanced fleet GTs.

    Due to schedule constraints, it was decided

    to not install a complete system consisting of

    five or seven Turbophase modules (TPMs)

    on a single F-class turbine. Instead, two TPMs

    were installed to demonstrate performance

    and the resulting values were extrapolated to

    model a complete system.

    In May, before the installation of the TPMs,

    a boroscope inspection of the compressor,

    combustor, turbine and exhaust was carried

    out. The compressor, combustor and exhaust

    were found in the expected condition for the

    turbines operating hours. The turbine portion,

    however, was heavily eroded, with significant

    gaps between stationary and rotating parts.

    The customers engine was about ready

    to go into outage so they basically took a GT

    that they were going to do a major overhaul

    on anyway and let us install there, says Kraft,

    adding that we made our incremental power

    and efficiency even on a GT that was basically

    worn out. It was a little risky if the GT broke, we

    would get blamed. Because of our extensive

    background on this type of gas turbine, we

    were confident that even though the GT was

    heavily deteriorated, there wasnt going to be

    any failure.

    The go-ahead for the project was given in

    early March, and in mid-July the first injection

    was made. Due to the short time period

    available, Powerphase needed to adapt

    some of the auxiliary systems. The TPMs power

    supply was planned to be provided from the

    turbines motor control centre (MCC). Due to

    logistics issues with material deliveries and

    cable installation from the MCC to the TPM

    location, which was some distance from the

    plant, it was decided to use diesel generators

    to supply the required power.

    This choice worked out well for us, from two

    perspectives, Kraft says. One, it was very easy

    for the customer to look at the diesel gensets

    power output and be able to calculate

    that the Turbophase modules electricity

    consumption was on the order of 35 kW, which

    is about 0.5 per cent of the power that we

    make. So our box makes 4.5 MW; 99.5 per centof that goes to the grid and 0.5 per cent goes

    to internal loads if its hooked up to a power

    plant electrical system. In this case it was all

    to the grid, but the customer could easily see

    what the power draw was and we also had

    a cooling system that took some power. But

    most of our installations are going to be of a

    nature where the plant is providing cooling

    water, so the auxiliary load is just the module.

    A second benefit: the customer is able

    to get comfortable with what happens if our

    system trips offline. Our diesel genset ran low

    on oil or had some issue and quit running in

    the middle of the night while we were injecting

    air, so we had an unplanned trip test. The

    Number of TPMs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Incremental power MW 4.50 9.00 13.50 18.00 22.50 27.00 31.50

    GT HR improvement % 0.70 1.40 2.10 2.80 3.50 4.20 4.90

    Figure 1. Predicted incremental output with additional TPMs on the gas turbine (5% air flow) at 2420F firing

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=14&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    17/52For more information, enter 10 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=mailto%3Apps%40ethosenergygroup.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ethosenergygroup.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    18/5216 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Retrofits & upgrades

    customer wanted to make sure we were not

    going to harm their GT if something goes afoul

    on our end, and we were able to prove that by

    shutting off the fuel to our system.The expected performance for the two

    TPMs was calculated based on the turbine

    model type and a constant firing temperature

    of 2420F.

    z Expected Output: 4.5 MW incremental

    power for one TPM, 9 MW in total for both;

    z Minimum Output: 4.05 MW incremental

    power for one TPM, 8.10 MW for both;

    z Heat Rate:Consistent with 5 per cent plant

    heat rate improvement.

    Based on the 5 per cent plant heat rate

    improvement from a full TPS installation, the

    predicted heat rate improvement per TPM was

    around 0.7 per cent at 4.5 MW incremental

    output and 2420F firing temperature.

    Firing temperature impacts the turbines

    output, which is defined as MW/(lb/s). The

    higher the firing temperature, the more output

    per lb/s of air flow and the more additional

    output per lb/s of air and steam injection.

    The OEMs design data for the GE-

    MS7001FA-(7FA.03) specifies performance at

    a firing temperature of 2420F. However, due

    to its degradation, Powerphase estimated

    that the turbine was actually operating

    at a firing temperature of 2370F. This was

    confirmed in site operations and validated

    with a ThermoFlow model matching the site

    operating conditions. This deviation had an

    impact on both the turbines and the TPMs

    performance. Powerphase noted that, if the

    turbine had been firing at 2420F as designed,

    the incremental output per TPM would have

    increased by 0.2 MW.

    Hitting targets

    The initial performance test was conductedon 28 July. The Turbophase system achieved

    its output and heat rate targets of 4.5 MW per

    TPM and 5 per cent heat rate improvement

    for a full installation. These values are based

    on the measured performance corrected for

    firing temperature and extrapolated to a full

    installation. Every day the system was turned

    on and off and you could see the incremental

    power and efficiency, says Kraft.

    At the customers request, a second

    performance test was conducted in early

    September and confirmed the results of the first

    test. In both cases, the upgrade demonstrated

    that a full installation of seven TPMs per turbine

    would produce a 5 per cent fuel efficiency

    improvement and 31.5 MW power increase

    on the 7FA gas turbine. Additionally, the

    system demonstrated as high as 99.3 per

    cent availability in ambient conditions upto 55C. The fuel efficiency improvement was

    demonstrated at both baseload and part-

    load operating conditions.

    The turbine was set to baseload select for

    the duration of the performance test. During

    the testing the fuel gas compressors were

    operational, which ensured a ~50 psi delta

    pressure across the turbines stop ratio valve

    (SRV) at all times. The generator readings were

    recorded as found. However, the recorded

    values for single TPM injections included

    the other TPM in cool-down/standby mode,

    which added another ~40 kW. The cooling

    water system was also running double to

    support both TPMs even when only one was

    operational. For these reasons, the generator

    loading recorded values were divided by two

    to provide more accurate results, as if only one

    TPM was operating.

    During commissioning of the TPM,

    injection tests were performed at various inlet

    conditions. A change in inlet temperature

    resulted in a change in gas turbine base

    output. Much care was taken to go through

    the data and match up inlet temperatures as

    closely as possible to show the incremental

    output at the same temperature. OEM inlet air

    temperature correction factors were not used,

    as they would scale the incremental output

    up or down.

    It was also observed that there were swings

    in the turbines fuel flow for constant turbine

    output, which would indicate that either the

    flow meter had some drift or fuel content was

    swinging during the testing.

    After the first injection into the turbine the

    hot commissioning phase was conducted,followed by the performance test. The first two

    weeks after the performance test were used to

    address commissioning issues on the system.

    In the weeks of operation, about 3.2 GWh

    were produced by the TPMs and provided

    to the grid. The TPMs availability was above

    97 per cent.

    At the as-found condition of the turbine,

    each TPM added 4.25 MW at 8650 BTU/kWh

    to the GT, for a total of 8.5 MW at 8100 heat

    rate. (The fuel flow readings from the gas

    turbine OEM flow meter are not accurate or

    stable enough to confirm the heat rate output.

    Performance calculations showed the heat

    rate closer to 8000 BTU/kWh.)

    By extrapolating the TPMs output from the

    current firing temperature of 2370F to the

    design point of 2420 F, the output increases to

    4.5 MW at 7600 BTU/kWh heat rate.An installation of five modules would

    result in an output increase of 22.5 MW. At an

    ambient temperature of 50C, this results in a

    19 per cent output increase and 3.5 per cent

    heat rate improvement.

    An installation of seven modules would

    result in an output increase of 31.5 MW. At

    50C ambient temperature, this results in a

    26 per cent output increase and a 5 per cent

    heat rate improvement.

    A new business model

    A turbine has to be down for six weeks or

    more if youre installing a new hot gas path

    or putting on an inlet cooling system youre

    basically building a power plant, Kraft says.

    Our system can load follow at the end of

    the day its really just a reciprocating engine

    driving the process, so we can move it around

    quickly we have one air pipe that hooks to

    the GT and, in both installations so far, outage

    has been less than one day. So when the

    plant is down for something else, we tie in

    and were done. There can be a month or

    two of relatively minor site work, the primary

    piece being the air pipe and fuel line. So its a

    really simple installation and leads to unique

    opportunities in that we can do something like

    the aircraft business does: power by the hour.

    Most engines on airplanes are leased

    rather than owned, he explains. You run it

    for a certain number of hours and turn it in,

    get a new one, and keep going like leasing

    a car. Our system is extremely quick to install

    or uninstall; the installation part is typically

    between 5 and 10 per cent of the overall cost

    to the customer, and we offer a leasing model.If youre putting an inlet chilling system

    on a GT youre buying it, and its only good for

    that GT. Our system works on all of the GTs at

    the plant that its piped to; we can pipe it to

    all of them, and you can lease it for a short

    period of time while building a new plant or

    just for the summer. This business model hasnt

    been around the large frame GT business

    ever. There have been businesses like this for

    the aeros several of the OEMs offer mobile or

    relatively mobile aeroderivative engines but

    nothing on large frame GTs.

    Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    for more information

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=16&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=16&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    19/52For more information, enter 11 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=17&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Ffincantieri.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=17&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    20/5218 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Gas turbine filtration

    Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    The cost of

    ineffective filtrationWhen selecting a high efficiency particulate air filtration solution, what factors

    need to be considered to optimize turbine efficiency, reduce maintenancefrequency and give a better overall return on investment for a particular

    installation? Steve Hinerhas some answers.

    Gas turbine inlet filter

    performance directly

    impacts the efficiency of

    the turbine plant in terms

    of power output and

    heat rate loss.

    Turbines consume vast amounts of air

    and an effective inlet filtration system is

    vital to maintaining optimum performance

    and reducing the need for maintenance

    shutdowns. Ineffective filtration solutions will

    lead to problems in turbine performance that

    will require operator intervention. The level

    of impact will depend upon environmental

    conditions on-site and this means that afiltration solution needs to be designed with

    an understanding of the local installation

    conditions. Depending where the turbine

    is installed, the filtration system may need

    to handle sand, salt, dust, hydrocarbons,

    moisture or even snow and ice.

    Fine particles entering a turbine can stick

    to turbine blades. This creates fouling which, as

    it builds up, affects the turbines aerodynamic

    performance. As output power reduces and

    heat rate rises, the operator will need to take

    the turbine offline to wash the compressor and

    restore its performance. The reduced turbine

    efficiency and the lost production time when

    it is taken offline have large cost impacts in

    terms of lost MW output and more fuel burned.

    High efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters

    offer greater levels of protection and so, in

    theory, will help to improve plant performance.

    However, the use of finer filters also presents

    challenges in terms of filter life. It has been

    shown that standard filter efficiency ratings

    from standardized laboratory-based filter

    testing do not necessarily result in the same

    performance when operated in the real world.

    Moisture and hydrocarbons found at site can

    cause sudden blockages that may result in

    pressure loss spikes and equipment downtime

    or damage.

    Comparing performance

    Filter solutions may generally use either

    microfibre glass (glass fibre) or membrane

    media, typically ePTFE, to achieve higher

    HEPA efficiency. Microfibre glass has

    historically been the more popular choice

    in industrial environments as it offers robust

    and predictable filtration performance. ePTFE

    membrane technology is relatively new to this

    application, so how can operators determine

    which is best for their installation?

    Both microfibre glass and ePTFE media

    types can achieve HEPA level performance

    with (H)EPA ratings of E11 or E12 to the

    international standard EN1822. Fundamentally,

    a higher filter efficiency requires finer media to

    filter out smaller particulates.

    One of the differences between microfibre

    glass and ePTFE is the thickness of the media

    used to achieve this. Microfibre glass filters use

    a deeper filtration layer whereas membrane

    solutions use a single, very thin layer. The

    problem is that the reduced total filtration

    volume means membrane technology can

    be more sensitive to blockage from moisture

    and hydrocarbons.

    Hydrocarbons can find their way into a

    turbine inlet as the result of many processes,

    including the by-products of combustion such

    as soot or unburnt fuel, oil vapour from lubeoil vents, and general atmospheric pollution.

    When combined with moisture they can cause

    filters to block and, if the filter is not designed to

    handle this, blockages may occur very quickly

    and without reasonable warning. As the

    turbine strives to suck the air it needs through

    its inlet, the filter blockage causes an increase

    in pressure drop. Sudden pressure loss spikes

    can result in costly unscheduled downtime or

    even damage to machinery or ductwork.

    ePTFE membranes have a thin, two-

    dimensional layer of high efficiency media

    which can quickly become blocked by

    moisture droplets. This media has been shown

    to be prone to sudden blockages and high

    A comparison of two gas turbines operating side-by-side at the same site shows the impact filtration can have

    Credit: CLARCOR

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=18&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    21/52

    Successfully proven in commercialoperation: the H-class from Siemens.Outstanding flexibility meets groundbreaking efficiency.

    siemens.com/gasturbines

    For more information, enter 12 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=19&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=19&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fsiemens.com%2Fgasturbines
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    22/5220 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    differential pressure spikes. Plugging has been

    seen to occur anywhere from as little as three

    weeks after installation and requires urgent

    remedial maintenance to prevent wider

    system damage. It is this unpredictability which

    means further research and development into

    this type of technology is required to make it

    more robust for heavy industrial applications.

    Microfibre glass media is around ten times

    thicker than a typical ePTFE membrane. Its

    greater pore volume makes it naturally less

    prone to sudden blockages, while its depth

    maintains an equivalent high particulate

    efficiency. Any pressure loss increase across

    the system has been proven to happen

    much more slowly than with ePTFE, givingthe operator plenty of time to take action

    and making this type of media much more

    predictable in its performance.

    Why is the thicker media with greater pore

    volume less prone to blockage when moisture

    is present? First, lets define the moisture that

    causes the problems. High humidity does not

    necessarily create an issue as this is not in

    droplet form and passes through the system

    with the air. If there is a lot of water, perhaps

    due to heavy rain, this is also not generally a

    problem as the large water droplets bounce

    off the filter or drain down the surface of the

    media.

    Mist and fog, however, have droplets that

    are of a comparable size to the fine particles

    filtered by HEPA filters and so a mist or fog

    event is equivalent to a sandstorm of very

    fine particles causing similar effects in the

    filter, where the droplets get into the media

    and clog it. Liquid droplets, once within the

    matrix of the media, combine and would

    normally drain out, but when a filter is loaded

    with hydrocarbon, this changes the surface

    tension on the media fibres. The water droplets

    are then more likely to cling to the fibres and

    remain within the media matrix, causing

    blinding and a high pressure loss.

    Filter construction

    Microfibre glass and membrane technologyachieve high efficiency filtration in different

    ways. Microfibre glass media uses its depth to

    capture particles which have to travel through

    a tortuous path inside the matrix. Membranes,

    however, use a thin layer of finer pores which

    create a sieving effect. This means the pores

    inside the microfibre glass media are larger

    and small water droplets are more likely to

    work their way through and, even if they

    remain within the media, they are less likely to

    plug the higher volume of larger pores.

    As well as selecting an appropriate media

    type, filters also need to be robust to ensure

    their reliability. If particulates are allowed to

    bypass the filter media, its efficiency rating is

    useless.

    Using the right glue, avoiding glue beads

    that may fall off once a filter is installed, and

    ensuring that the overall filter design is robust

    are important considerations. Features such as

    seamless gaskets on filters also help to prevent

    leaks during operation. Frame materials

    should always be selected to handle the

    installations environmental conditions and

    designed to remain robust after aging.

    One problem operators face when

    selecting a filtration solution is that standard

    efficiency ratings do not necessarily reflect

    how a filter will perform in the real world.

    Current ratings are based on laboratory

    testing that does not cover the wide variety ofconditions and environments a turbine may

    be subjected to.

    Take, for example, the hydrophobicity of a

    filter: its ability to prevent liquid and salts from

    passing through, causing turbine corrosion

    and accelerated fouling. This should be a

    major consideration for the power industry,

    but there is no industry standard test to

    rate the performance of a filter in this area.

    CLARCOR uses a patented hydrophobic test

    to determine the performance of its filters. It is

    designed to test areas such as salt leaching

    and takes the filter through a total of nine wet/

    dry cycles within a ten-day protocol to simulate

    filter performance in real-world installations.

    Gas turbine filtration

    Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    Fibreglass is able to handle moisture better than membrane due to its thickness

    Credit: CLARCOR

    The difference between filters that are both

    classified by manufacturers as hydrophobic

    Credit: CLARCOR

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=20&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    23/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 21

    Gas turbine filtration

    Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    A major gas turbine supplier recently carried out comparative tests

    on the performance of equivalent ePTFE membrane and microfibre

    glass HEPA products. The tests covered overall efficiency, pressure loss,

    hydrophobic performance, wet performance and the dust-holdingcapacity of each technology. Microfibre glass filters showed equal or

    better performance than ePTFE at a lower cost. The gas turbine supplier

    then chose the microfibre glass filter as its filter of choice for its next-

    generation technology.

    Overall, the real-world performance of gas turbine filters has

    shown that, for the moment, microfibre glass technology offers a more

    predictable and reliable solution than membranes such as ePTFE

    media. It offers a higher pore volume which is less sensitive to plugging

    with moisture and hydrocarbons while providing the same dust filtration

    efficiency.

    The predictable nature of microfibre glass filters means they have a

    much longer life, with a gradual increase in pressure loss over time that

    is less likely to trip turbines or require unexpected maintenance. They

    offer a robust, lower-cost, longer-life (H)EPA filter solution.

    Although ePTFE membrane filters can offer a typical lifespan of

    two years, this is much shorter than microfibre glass equivalents. The

    unpredictable nature of membrane filters further means they require

    much closer monitoring and any change-out needs to happen

    quickly to avoid damage to other systems. Overall, they may currently

    appear to offer a good solution, but operators should take into account

    maintenance frequency and lifetime costs when considering their

    selection.

    What may the future hold?

    Industry experience indicates that microfibre glass technology offers

    operators greater peace of mind with regard to predictable, reliable

    turbine output.

    For this reason, CLARCOR does not currently recommend the

    use of ePTFE media on turbine installations. CLARCOR is an in-house

    manufacturer of ePTFE membrane, uses it successfully in many of its

    other filtration products, and would like to be able to provide it for GT

    inlet filtration but the global diversity in ambient air contaminants

    makes its performance just too unpredictable today for use with gas

    turbines.

    As membrane technology continues to be developed, however,

    improvements in its sensitivity to moisture and hydrocarbons may well

    make it a good option in the future. Other materials such as nanofibresalso continue to be developed. These are synthetic polymer-based

    media very similar to microfibre glass that may soon offer a further

    viable alternative solution with HEPA filtration efficiency levels.

    Testing standards continue to be researched and developed for

    the implications of different environmental factors on the performance

    of a filter and, therefore, the performance of turbines is more clearly

    understood. Hopefully, in the near future, standards will give operators

    a more comprehensive evaluation of how a filter will operate in the real

    world.

    Steve Hiner is Chief Engineer, Gas Turbine Inlet Systems at CLARCOR

    Industrial Air. www.clarcorindustrialair.com

    Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    for more information

    INDUSTRIAL ELEVATORS

    www.geda.de

    Efficiency.Made in Germany

    INDUSTRIAL ELEVATORS

    GEDAs state of the art industrial rack &

    pinion elevators have been specially de-

    signed for industrial use, including the

    power generation industry, where there is

    a growing need for safe, reliable vertical

    transportation of personnel and material.

    GEDA can offer several elevator options

    to meet the service requirements of the

    power generation industry including

    boilers, chimneys, FGD, SCR, transfer

    towers, crusher buildings, fly ash silos,and precipitators.

    For more information, enter 13 at pei.hotims.com

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geda.dehttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarcorindustrialair.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    24/5222 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle

    Manufacturer ModelGross output

    (MW)Heat rate(kJ/kWh)

    Gross efficiency(%)

    Shaft speed (rpm)Pressure

    ratio

    Ansalso Energia

    AE64.3A 78 9917 36.3 3000/3600 18.3AE94.2 185 9945 36.2 3000 12

    AE94.2K 170 9863 36.5 3000 12

    AE94.3A 310 9045 39.8 3000 19.5

    AE-T100 0.1 12,000 30 70,000 4.5

    GE

    TM2500 34.3 10,197 35.3 3000 24.5

    LM2500 23.8 10,606 33.9 3000 19

    LM2500 DLE 22.4 10,167 35.4 3000 18.1

    LM2500+ 30 10,154 35.5 3000 23.1

    LM2500+ DLE 31.1 9674 37.2 3000 23.6

    LM2500+ G4 34.5 10,209 35.3 3000 24.6

    LM2500+ G4 DLE 33.4 9671 37.2 3000 24

    LM6000PC 45.4 8973 40.1 3627 29.7

    LM6000PC Sprint 51.1 8922 40.4 3627 31.5

    LM6000PF 45 8573 42 3627 30.1

    LM6000PF Sprint 50 8580 42 3627 31.6

    LM6000PG 56 8974 40.1 3911 33.5

    LM6000PG Sprint 59 9035 39.8 3911 34

    LM6000PF+ 53 8603 41.8 3911 32.1

    LM6000PF+ Sprint 57 8693 41.4 3911 34

    LMS100PA+ 114 8319 43.3 3000 42.5

    LMS100PB+ 108 8204 43.9 3000 42.2

    6B.03 44 10,740 33.5 5163 12.7

    6F.01 52 9369 38.4 7266 21

    6F.03 82 9991 36 5231 16.49E.03 132 10,403 34.6 3000 13.1

    9E.04 145 9717 37 3000 12.3

    GT13E2 2005 185 9524 37.8 3000 16.9

    GT13E2 2012 203 9474 38 3000 18.2

    9F.03 265 9517 37.8 3000 16.7

    9F.04 281 9316 38.6 3000 16.9

    9F.05 299 9295 38.7 3000 18.3

    9F.06 342 8768 41.1 3000 20

    9HA.01 429 8483 42.4 3000 22.9

    9HA.02 519 8440 42.7 3000 23.8

    TM2500 37.1 9676 37.2 3600 24.7

    LM2500 24.8 10,265 35.1 3600 19

    LM2500 DLE 23.2 9830 36.6 3600 18

    LM2500+ 31.8 9761 36.9 3600 23.1

    LM2500+ DLE 31.9 9269 38.8 3600 23.1

    LM2500+ G4 37.1 9676 37.2 3600 24.7

    LM2500+ G4 DLE 34.5 9188 39.2 3600 23.6

    LM6000PC 46 8924 40.3 3600 29.6

    LM6000PC Sprint 52 8909 40.4 3600 31.3

    LM6000PF 45 8543 42.1 3600 29.8

    LM6000PF Sprint 50 8555 42.1 3600 31.4

    LM6000PG 56 8993 40 3905 33.5

    LM6000PG Sprint 59 9053 39.8 3905 34

    LM6000PF+ 53 8625 41.7 3905 32.1

    LM6000PF+ Sprint 57 8711 41.3 3905 34

    LMS100PA+ 117 8190 44 3600 42.5

    LMS100PB+ 109 8172 44.1 3600 42.1

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=22&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    25/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 23Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016

    Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle

    Exhaustmass flow

    (kg/s)

    Exhausttemperature

    (C)NOx emissions (ppmv)

    Weight(tonnes)

    DimensionsL x W x H (metres)

    Notes

    215 573 25 61 5.9 x 3.1 x 3 AE64.3A with gear (gas turbine 90 Hz)555 541 25 233 10 x 4 x 3.7

    540 545 25 190 10.2 x 4 x 3.7 Performance with low heating value gas

    750 576 25 317 10.8 x 5.1 x 4.9

    0.8 270 15 2.77 3.9 x 0.9 x 1.8 Microturbine

    92.5 517 25 112 32 x 3 x 4

    71.3 530 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection

    68.4 547 15 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE

    89.5 493 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection

    88.8 539 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE

    96.6 519 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 Water injection, gearbox

    93 552 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 DLE, gearbox

    129.7 436 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    135.3 449 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    127.3 457 15 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox

    132.7 459 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox

    143.4 470 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    144.4 480 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    135.3 500 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox

    143.2 490 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox

    231.2 422 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection

    227 421 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection

    145.1 548 4 100 13 x 4 x 4 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz

    126.1 603 25 70 6 x 4 x 4 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz

    213.2 613 15 100 10 x 4 x 5 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz419.1 544 5 214 11 x 5 x 5

    415.5 542 15 219 11 x 5 x 5

    567.4 505 25 343 11 x 6 x 5

    624.1 501 15 350 11 x 6 x 6

    665 596 15 308 11 x 5 x 5

    667.2 608 15 308 11 x 5 x 5

    666.8 642 25 322 11 x 5 x 5

    731.2 618 15 386 11 x 5 x 5

    826.4 633 25 386 11 x 5 x 5

    995.6 636 25 432 12 x 5 x 5

    94.6 510 25 112 32 x 3 x 4 Water injection

    71.2 525 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection

    68.2 539 15 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE

    89.3 490 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection

    87 526 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE

    96.5 510 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 Water injection

    91.5 535 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 DLE

    129 440 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection

    133.9 455 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection

    125.6 461 15 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE

    131.4 463 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE

    143.3 471 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    144.2 481 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox

    135.1 500 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox

    143.1 490 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox230.7 416 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection

    226.8 418 25 897 34 x 24 x15 Water injection

    http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=23&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com
  • 7/26/2019 pei201604-dl

    26/5224 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com

    Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle

    Manufacturer ModelGross output

    (MW)Heat rate(kJ/kWh)

    Gross efficiency(%)

    Shaft speed (rpm)Pressure

    ratio

    GE(continued)

    6B.03 44 10,740 33.5 5163 12.76F.01 52 9369 38.4 7266 21.0

    6F.03 82 9991 36.0 5231 16.4

    7E.03 91 10,614 33.9 3600 13.0

    7F.04 198 9327 38.6 3600 16.7

    7F.05 241 9052 39.8 3600 18.4

    7F.06 270 8704 41.4 3600 22.1

    7HA.01 280 8630 41.7 3600 21.6

    7HA.02 346 8525 42.2 3600 23.1

    Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd

    GPB300D 30.1 8977 40.1

    9330/5600 (gas

    generator rotor/

    power turbine

    rotor

    24.5

    GPB180D 18.4 10,526 34.2 9420 18.3

    GPB80D 7.8 10,714 33.6 13,800 15.9

    GPB70D 6.7 12,000 30 13,800 15.9

    GPB50D 4.8 10,905 33

    GPB17D 1.7 13,382 26.9 21,965 10.5

    MAN Diesel & Turbo SE

    THM1304-10N 10.5 11840 30.4 9000 10

    THM1304-12N 12.5 11320 31.8 9000 11

    MGT6100 6.63 11190 32.2 1500/1800 14

    Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd

    H-25(28) 28.13 10,527 34.2 7280 14.2

    H-25(32) 32.3 10,338 34.8 7280 15.4

    H-25(35) 37.69 10,288 35 7280 17.7

    H-25(42) 42.03 9664 37.2 7280 17.5

    H-50 57.45 9508 37.8 5040 19.5

    H-100(100) 99.