pei201604-dl
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
1/52
Gas &Steam
Turbine
The magazine for the international power industry April 2016
www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Special Focus
THE DANGERS OF GASTURBINE MULTI-STARTS
STEAM TURBINES: NEWTRENDS & INNOVATION
DRY AIR INJECTION TORAISE FUEL EFFICIENCY
HOW TO PICK THE BESTFILTRATION SYSTEM
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=Cover&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
2/52
A new generation is born
www.ansaldoenergia.com
New products.
New technologies.
New service capabilities.
Ansaldo Energia: a global player
in the power generation market.
02/2
01
et
gra
r
For more information, enter 1 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=C2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=C2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ansaldoenergia.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
3/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 1
POWER ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL
Contents
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Credit: xxx
Free Product InfoYou can request product and service information from this issue. Simply click on the link below that will provide you access to supplier companies websites,
product information and more http://pei.hotims.com
If you are considering suppliers or buying products you read about in PEi, please use this service. It gives us an idea of how products are being received to help us continually
improve our editorial offering and it also lets our advertisers know that you are a PEi reader and helps them to continue supporting the free distribution of your magazine.
Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
Get the latest gas and steam turbine specifications from the OEMs: p22
Credit: Siemens48 Ad Index
On the cover
Cover design: Samantha Heasmer. Images courtesy of Ansaldo, GE and Siemens.
APRIL 2016///VOLUME 24///ISSUE 4
Features
2 Advances in steam turbine technology
Central to the future of thermal power plants is the steamturbine, and its manufacturers are focussing on improving
the design and performance of these machines.
10 The risk of start-stops to gas turbines
The increasing requirement for gas turbine multi-starts couldseriously injure your assets.
12 Boosting gas turbines with dry air injection
A demonstration project in Saudi Arabia has installed a dry
air injection system upgrade to improve fuel efficiency.
18 The cost of ineffective filtration
What filtration factors need to be considered to optimizeturbine efficiency and reduce maintenance frequency.
Gas & Steam Turbine Directory
22 Gas & Steam Turbine Technical Specifications
33 Products and Services Listings
38 Company Listings
Coming up in Mays issue
POWER-GEN Europe issue
Optimizing gas engine performance
Emissions control: meeting new European regulations
Piping and the European Pressure Equipment Directive
The way forward for energy storage
Are SMRs the future of nuclear in Europe?
Solar power in the Russian Federation
Inside two new cutting-edge gas-fired plantsPOWER-GEN Europe preview and highlights
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=1&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=1&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
4/522 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Steam turbines
Advancing steamturbine technology
David Appleyard looks at how steam turbine manufacturers are focusing onimproving the design and performance of their machines.
Renewables may have struck a
decisive lead in new worldwide
power capacity investment, but
King Coal is still to be dethroned.
Indeed, according to GE, coal
still represents nearly 30 per cent
of global energy consumption its highest
share since 1970 and provides 40 per cent
of the worlds electricity. While this number is
expected to fall, coal will remain the backbone
of the power system in many countries.
Consequently, the global steam turbine
market is projected by some analysts to growfrom an estimated $12,872.5 million in 2015 to
some $19,292 million by 2020.
Trevor Bailey, General Manager of Steam
Power Systems at GE, comments: Coal is still
around and will be around for some time
in certain parts of the world where its the
most readily available fuel. We need to find
responsible, environmentally friendly ways of
using that fuel.
With the drive to improve environmental
performance across the power
generation sector, manufacturers of key
electromechanical equipment are under
pressure to improve energy efficiency, but
in a competitive market operations and
maintenance considerations are always high
on the agenda. In the case of coal-fired or
other thermal plant, the steam turbine is one
principal area of focus for the major OEMs.
Predicting operational integrity
Jiri Fiala, Director of R&D at Doosan Skoda
based in the Czech Republic, emphasizes the
role of detailed knowledge of a steam turbine
in improving plant performance: First, what is
important for the operator? It is important to
have a good picture of the turbine cycle. It
means information and this is measurementconnected with the control system. On the
other hand, we can offer a remote monitoring
system which means that we are always
connected online and we are able also to
advise the plant operator.
Fiala explains how such a system can
support plant operations: We are asked by
our clients that their turbines should be able to
operate without a major overhaul for maybe
ten years or eight years. Our answer is yes, but
it is necessary also to take into account the
correct operation of the turbine. For example,
the purity of the steam as mechanical
impurities can damage some surfaces of th=e
flow path can damage some glands and
seals. If the chemical purity of the steam is poor,
there can also be wear on the rotor blades
which can be, after some time, damaged by
chemical effects on the material.
We are able to extend the period
between service intervals, but it is necessary
for the operator to comply with some
recommendations to keep the purity of the
steam within some limits.
This is a point picked up by Bailey: Theres
an element of erosion from the continuous
flow of steam through the steam turbine that,
over many years, does have some impact,particularly on the longer blades. The last
stage or the low pressure section of the
turbine, for example, can experience some
heavy erosion.
Theres also a mechanical integrity
element to this, making sure the rotating
equipment is operating safely and that it is
capable of operating over extended periods
of time, as many power plants are operating
way beyond their original design life.
Making life assessment studies and
making sure the equipment is safe to operate
is another part of the service portfolio.
He continues: Having that deep domain
knowledge around how the machine is
Steam turbines are central to the future of thermal power plant
Credit: Siemens
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=2&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
5/52
www.pasquick.com
What keeps asset owners one layer aheadwhen meeting budget targets?
As a leading global supplier of polymer solutions in the chemical industry,we lay the ground for a true game changer in corrosion protection. Its
comes to budget control for the protection of industrial facilities, What can we invent for you?
COST SAVINGS
CovestroDeutschlandAG
,D-
51365Leverkusen
COV00080145
For more information, enter 2 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=3&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=3&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pasquick.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
6/524 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Steam turbines
designed, how the materials are incorporated
in the different parts of the rotating equipment,
and being able to apply that to predict
what remains of the in-service life of a piece
of equipment is a core competency and
obviously we use that extensively.
Were constantly, through our monitoring
centres, gathering data and understanding
trends on different fleets so we can start
to predict failures on families of machines
and therefore make that less traumatic for
customers, because we can step in and
advise them of the high probability of a failure
in this operating mode.
Predictive maintenance is a very
important dimension, especially on
equipment thats running. Its got a design
life of 30+ years and could be running longer
than that, and as we move more into the
industrial digital environment were able to use
digital applications to help customers operate
their plant more efficiently, preventing forced
outages by having more innovative, predictive
maintenance and monitoring approaches.
Dr Lutz Voelker, responsible for the Research
and Development of Industrial Steam Turbines
at Siemens, also emphasizes the importanceof long-term predictability: Material is one
of the key elements in the design and it is
important to know its behaviour after ten, 15,
25 years of operation.
If you have a better understanding of the
long-term behaviour of the material, you can
apply this knowledge to the design philosophy.
So if you have, in the past, used very heavy
construction due to uncertainties in the long-
term behaviour, now with new knowledge of
the materials behaviour you can optimize
the design by wall thicknesses and main
dimensions reduction, keeping same safety
margins, as you know exactly what will happen
after 20 or 25 years of operation.
We can, for example, improve the design
philosophy, make the turbine lighter in total
weight, and extend the application range
and operational behaviour of the technology.
Voelker adds: To improve operational
availability further, Siemens offers a remote
monitoring system which allows tracking
of some key values of the turbine. Based
on knowledge over its lifetime, customers
can get direct feedback as to whether the
defined turbine overhauls are required or if the
operation can be extended.
Changing operational profiles
Noting the changing demand profile for
thermal plant operation in many markets as a
result of increasing volumes of variable output
renewables, Voelker highlights another trend
in steam turbine development: Flexibility and
customization. That means fast startup times
or unlimited load changes while in operation
to act on and support stronger green power
generation. Steam units are not making base
load as in the past. Further, steam turbines
used in combination with green power
generation such as solar plants must fulfil the
special demands of this application. To bestill successful with steam turbines, we have
to follow these new market requirements for
operation.
Fiala also notes the changing marketplace:
Demands to improve partial load operation
or fluctuations in demand have risen in recent
years, for example in Europe where there
are increasing volumes of variable-output
renewable energy such as photovoltaics.
Equipment connected to the inlet parts
of the turbine will enable higher power output
and also very high efficiency on lower power
operation, very good dynamic efficiency.
Increasing ramp-up rates and shortening
startup procedures or startup times, for
example increasing the number of starts,
is a typical request from, for example, solar
power plants which every day start and
stop the turbines. This requires changes andmodifications to the design, mainly on the
rotor part to reduce concentration of the
stresses on the rotor, to enable the rotor to start
very rapidly if the number of starts and stops
for the application is very, very high.
It is possible to do this, but with some
special design provisions. Measuring the
temperature close to rotor or some stator parts,
and using some evaluation in the control
system, you can calculate the temperature
on the surfaces of the turbine and inside
the rotor. Based on this knowledge, you can
change or evaluate the startup procedure to
maintain limits within a safe area. Above this
limit, definitely the lifetime of the material will
expire very fast.
He adds: On the other hand, the control
system can take all this information and
evaluate, lets say, a residual lifetime of the
rotor.
Voelker: It is an improvement based on the
latest developments in the flow path of the
design.
Sealing and steam pathIn addition to improving predictability in
various operational modes, improvements
also cover the various sealing systems within
the machine and steam path to boost thermal
efficiency for example, the introduction of
abradable materials for the sealing concept
or brush steel technologies to improve the
efficiency and the internal performance.
As Ronald Schmidt, responsible for the
industrial steam turbines business segment
at Siemens, explains: We had a very robust
blading path design in the past. It wasefficient but not as good compared to what
we saw in the big steam units, but for different
applications we have now introduced highly
sophisticated blade path designs which are
normally used for the big steam units, and
in the 3DV blading which is a lean sweep
blade path design with an improved sealing
geometry that means more sealing strips per
blade row to cover or reduce the leakages.
Applying expertise derived from other
areas of business is also a key consideration for
GE, as Bailey observes: GE acquired Alstoms
power generation and grid businesses late
last year, and one area where we do have
significant overlap is around steam turbine
Detailed knowledge of a steam turbine can improve plant performance
Credit: Doosan Skoda Power
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=4&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
7/52
Integrated Power Generation Solutions
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe supplies up-to-date,
efficient products. We construct most modern power plants.
And we deliver reliable and cost-effective service solutions.
Our green technologies in energy storage and biomass,
for instance are examples for our innovation capabilities.
Intelligent power generation solutions require know-how and
experience. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems has them
both making us a globally successful energy plant constructor
and service provider. www.eu.mhps.com
Joint Forces
21 23 June 2016
MiCo Milano,
Milan, ItalyVisit us at stand 3HD82
For more information, enter 3 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=5&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=5&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eu.mhps.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
8/526 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
technology. Thats actually provided us
with the opportunity to look at two ways of
addressing how best to provide the most
efficient steam turbines to make best use of all
these fuels, and we are now actively looking at
the technologies that are available to us.
GE has historically been a wheel-and-
diaphragm-type architecture, more an
impulse steam turbine, although in recent
years with HEAT (High Efficiency Advanced
Technology), primarily used in combined
cycles, the firm has moved more into high
reaction-type architectures. Alstom has a mix
of technologies coming from both camps.
And, as Bailey notes, one area of
development is in the area of sealing within
the steam turbine: We have a mix of sealing
technology thats applied to different places
on the steam turbine: brush seals, traditional
labyrinth seals, abradable-type seals. With the
combination of Alstom and GE technologies,
we now have a broad range of sealing
capability that can be used across all of these
applications, and that can vary depending
on the mission that the
steam turbine has to
operate within.
If youre in
combined cycle
where the machine
may be operating for
prolonged periods
at part load or could
be stopping and
starting every day, the
sealing technologies
can be different to a
machine like a nuclear
application where itsmore a baseload-type
application.
Bailey concludes:
From a GE point of
view, a lot of sealing
technology for rotating
equipment has flowed
down from our aviation
and gas turbine
capabilities and is
now being applied in
a steam environment.
Alstom obviously
comes at that from
a different direction,
looking at it from a steam turbine point of
view from the outset. Were going through that
process of learning from each other and being
able to draw upon the best technologies andlooking at the operating experiences from
both companies. I think there are going to be
some exciting developments as our engineers
really get to grips with what we now have
available to us.
Improving steam condition
One well-known route to improving the thermal
efficiency of power plant systems is to boost
the temperature and pressure characteristics
of the steam.
Bailey says: Operating steam temperatures
we continue to push. Were operating at
600C live steam inlet conditions, pushing re-
heat temperatures further, and that means
materials development continues, obviously
pushing 650C inlet temperature and longer-
term to 700C, potentially beyond that even.
A number of programmes are in place
to drive materials development, which
GE is actively engaged in, along with the
production techniques required.
Its not something that will change
dramatically, its a more evolutionary process.
From a steam turbine point of view its not such
a big challenge; other components such as
boilers and some of the interconnecting
pipe work actually are somewhat more
challenging from a materials point of view. We
could move to higher temperatures now with
a steam turbine, but youve got to bring the
rest of the power plant with it.
Nonetheless, GE has revealed a
breakthrough in re-heat technology.
An area that is of interest to us is around
double re-heat technology. In the past, large
coal power generation has been based ona single re-heat Rankine cycle. Were looking
at technologies now where we can take two
re-heat cycles back to the boiler and pass it
through a second intermediate turbine, which
gives us a significant efficiency boost, says
Bailey.
Were pushing the materials capability
that we have available to us too. Were using
proven technology with a slightly different
steam cycle. It delivers a significant boost
in cycle efficiency in excess of 1 per cent in
overall net power plant efficiency. Were calling
it LE2 Leading Efficiency, Lower Emissions as
clean-as-it-can-be power generation using
solid fossil fuels.
Steam turbines
www.cd-adapco.com
COMBUSTORSGAS TURBINES
GENERATORSCOMPRESSORS
DISCOVER BETTER DESIGNS. FASTER.
MULTIDISCIPLINARY SIMULATION FOR CLEAN, EFFICIENT ENERGY AND
ECONOMICAL, RELIABLE POWER
The RDK8 single re-heat plant in Karlsruhe, Germany
Credit: EnBW AG
For more information, enter 4 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=mailto%3Ainfo%40cd-adapco.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cd-adapco.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=6&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
9/52
Steam turbines
The double re-heat cycle follows on from
the operating experience of the worlds most
efficient single re-heat power plant at the RDK8
installation in Germany. GE says the plant atthe Rheinhafen-Dampfkraftwerk facility in
Karlsruhe has achieved 47.5 per cent net
thermal efficiency while producing 912 MWe.
If you looked at a double re-heat in the
same location as RDK8, it would be in the
range of 49.5 per cent plus net power plant
efficiency, says Bailey.
Doosans Fiala also picks up on the push
towards 700C steam. We have in operation
ultra-supercritical turbines which operate at
about 600C. High steam parameters mean
high efficiency and 600C is fairly typical. On
the other hand, many companies, including us,
are thinking about 700C. For 700C conditions
we have prepared some materials for the rotor,
components welded from several parts. We
have done some tests on this welding process
and are developing some components for this
700C plant, which we suppose is the future.
Of course, that will depend on the cost or the
price of the electricity because everything
should be calculated economically, and
higher parameters also mean higher cost or
higher investment, so everything should have
sufficient payback.
There are supply chain considerations too,as Fiala says: 600C conditions are common
in the market so that is why, for example,
P92 material for the casting or hot casting
or main pipelines is available. On the other
hand, when we speak about 700C then it is
necessary to speak about alternatives such as
nymonic alloy or chromium alloy combination
of the rotor. This is not an easy task and that is
why, over the last two, two and a half years we
have developed such a welding procedure. It
does also depend on the supplier because
we can develop some welding procedures
or heat treatment procedures but we need to
buy good quality forgings.
Siemens is also extending turbine steam
conditions for industrial steam turbines: With
the enhanced platform, we have increased
the lasting capability for our building block
system, which now goes up to a maximum of
565C, 180 bar pressure level for continuous
operation. Compared to the former design,
that is an improvement of 25 Kelvin higher
temperature and roughly 40 bar higher
pressure level, says Voelker.
He adds: For the area of industrial units
we are not considering actual 700C steamconditions. The industry is currently focussed
in the area of 560C580C as we see no
benefit in improving or increasing live steam
conditions on industrial units. If you are talking
about higher live steam conditions, then it
goes more in the direction of the big steam
and CCPP units. Big steam is at the level
of 600C, 280 bar and CCPP at the level of
600C, 177 bar that we already have in the
field. Especially for CCPP, Siemens is working to
increase the live steam conditions further.
New manufacturing techniques
One further trend concerns the use of novel
manufacturing technologies to reduce lead
time and costs.
Schmidt says: I believe what is next on
the operations side of manufacturing is the
full digitalization chain, which we are working
on. Obviously R&D gives us a very flexible
product with lots of alterations possible for the
specific customer order. Unfortunately, from a
For more information, enter 5 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=mailto%3Aprotective%40hempel.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpowergen.hempel.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=7&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
10/528 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
manufacturing perspective, the one-off which
this creates in terms of manufacturing is the
challenge we have to manage.
We believe the digitization initiative we
are running there will give us a little bit of
an edge as well. The concept really is that
when R&D designs, lets take a casing as an
example, they provide their particular design;
this is altered to the customer-specific order in
our customer order engineering team, and
then this creates a 3D model, which is then
submitted to the supplier which casts the part.
The difficult portion is really that we
need to know the as-is dimensions for the
next manufacturing step. The vendor, in this
case the casting house, provides the as-is model and this is then submitted to the
manufacturing team in Goerlitz, and while
the transportation is being done from China
or wherever the vendor is located, we can
prepare manufacturing of the part already
with the as-is dimensions of the scanned
part we received from the supply base. Then
we can optimize manufacturing technology
with the blades. In the end we simulate the
manufacturing of the part, so when the actual
part arrives in the plant we can immediately
start machining without spending a lot of time
on setup.
We will have an optimized programming of
the machine, and the results are documented
electronically as well. So if we go to a unit that
is running in the field, we know immediately
what the dimensions are because we have
the electronic models, and then we can
service the unit much better going forward.
Its the 3D model of the components, the
simulation of the process and the machine
tool itself, these three
things need to be
brought together,
really, to do this in a
concurrent way rather
than sequential.
Schmidt also
notes the use of
laser sintering in
the manufacture of
components from the
gas turbine arena: We
do use 3D printing,
but for various gas
turbine components.For steam turbines we
utilize this technology
rather in the area of
machining fixtures. We
need very variable
parts so the fixtures
need to be variable as
well, and if you do that
in metal all the time it
is very costly and takes
quite a long time. Now
you do the stimulation
of the part, then you
print the insert for the
machining fixture. This
is a specific example where 3D printing helps
to save costs and gain time.
He concludes, though: In the steam
turbine unit, laser sintering doesnt seem to bethat attractive at the present moment, first and
foremost because of cost.
The cost issue is also noted by Fiala: Of
course there could be a use of some different
up-to-date technology for some components,
such as laser sintering, but definitely I think,
for example, gas turbines which use higher
temperatures are a different story. Steam
turbines are more or less conservative:
definitely we use some special materials, but
typically smaller rather than big components
I mean, for example, some sealing parts
because new techniques or technologies
usually are also more costly, so that is why we
need to evaluate the cost of the material and
manufacturing.
In the future, for example, there will be some
3-D printing mainly for small components, but
maybe not always for small components.
He adds: There are also some standard
procedures with some scope for improvement
of the surface, for example hardening of the
inlet stages of the last or last-but-one stages,
which operate in wet steam to improve erosion
protection.
Future turbine developments
Looking ahead, Voelker suggests further
improvements in performance are anticipated:
What we are working on currently is, of course,
some further improvements in efficiency, and
strong interest and activity in the field of further
development in the last stage blading area.
That is one key component in the overall steam
unit, to reach higher performance levels.
In mid-2015 Siemens also delivered a steam
turbine that operates almost entirely withoutlubricants, with the bearing systems consisting
of air-cooled, active electromagnetic bearings.
The first 10 MW turbine equipped with
magnetic bearings was installed at Vattenfalls
lignite-fired Jnschwalde steam power plant
in the German state of Brandenburg.
Voelker concludes:We believe that flexibility,
going forward, is key in both dimensions: cost
and efficiency. That needs to be supported as
well by a flexible manufacturing system.
David Appleyard is a freelance journalist
Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
for more information
Steam turbines
FEATURING: Steam Turbine Generator Additional Fuel Intake System Dust Suppression Transformers and Switch Gear Wood Pellet Hammer Mills Mobile Plant and Vehicles Circuit Breaker and Relays Air Compressors A substantial quantity of Turbine spares
including spare LP, HP and IP rotors
For further information, contact:
LEIGH MCCARRONTelephone: +44 (0) 7901 [email protected]
LOCATION: Ironbridge, Shropshire, United Kingdom
EQUIPMENT FROM THECLOSURE OF IRONBRIDGE
POWER STATION
SALE
COMPLETE CONVERSION TO BIOMASS
FUEL IN 2013 BY DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS
To view and bid on the lots, please visit:
http://www.go-dove.com/en/events?cmd=details&event=561141
PRIVATETREATYOn the instructions ofUniper UK Ltd
Machine Shop, Spare Parts andAccessories Equipment
Conveyors, Hoppers, Silos, Tanksand other Transfer Equipment
Gantry Cranes Railway Lines Water Treatment Plant and Large
Capacity Water Pumps
More Power Generation Assetscoming available during 2016.
The RDK8 steam turbine
Credit: EnBW AG
For more information, enter 6 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.go-dove.com%2Fen%2Fevents%3Fcmd%3Ddetails%26event%3D561141http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=mailto%3Aleigh.mccarron%40liquidityservices.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=8&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
11/52
The industry-proven GE5 gas turbine has
evolved into the new NovaLT5 with design
advances from our highly successful NovaLT16
development program.
NovaLT5 delivers 5.6 MW with 31% efficiency,
24,000 hours MTBM and significantly lower
operating and maintenance costs. The compact
package is excellent for a wide range of powergeneration applications, and its high exhaust
temperature makes it an ideal solution for
cogeneration.
geoilandgas.com/NovaLT5
BIGDEALFOR SMALLPOWER
GEN
For more information, enter 7 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=9&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=9&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fgeoilandgas.com%2FNovaLT5 -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
12/5210 www.PowerEngineeringInt.comPower Engineering InternationalApril 2016
Gas turbine maintenance
The growing need for multi-starts could seriously injure your assets, says Gary Lock
A
s the energy industry
increases its uptake of
power from renewables,
the level of demand on
large frame gas turbines
becomes less predictable,
with start-ups triggered by the vagaries of the
weather and the economic market.
Gas turbine operators are having to multi-
start machines, sometimes as often as twice
a day. Indeed, multi-starting has become
the norm it is common to hear of over 500
starts a year with superfast ramp-up periods.
What damage is this causing to machines
that were designed, effectively, for continuous
operation? And what might be the resulting
risks and cost implications for the industry?
Gas turbines were initially designed tofacilitate base loading with minimal starts but
with industry changes, multi-starting is putting
high-integrity components through multiple
strain cycles for which they were not designed.
Making assumptions that components can
withstand these requirements based on
the generalization that a defined number of
starts is equivalent to a particular number of
operating hours is at best optimistic, and at
worst could be dangerous.
A key change in the impact on
components is that, in traditional use, the
dominant failure process for hot components
was creep. They were thus designed using
creep-resistant alloys and their stresses were
controlled appropriately. In the new era of
multi-starts, the components experience
high thermal transients during startup, and
this, together with ever-shortening ramp-up
times and increasing operating cycles, has a
significant detrimental effect on their integrity.
Multi-starts mean the stressed components
in gas turbines are now subjected to low
cycle fatigue and, for many, this becomes the
dominant failure criterion. Hot components
have the added problem of creep, as outlined
above. This, when combined with low cycle
fatigue, can reduce the component lifespan
dramatically below that expected of each
of these failure criteria in isolation. Historically,
assessing low-cycle fatigue damage has been
problematic. While inspection and evaluation
of creep damage is fairly straightforward, forlow-cycle fatigue analytical methods provide
the most effective way of knowing the extent
of life remaining in a component.
The difficulty in assessing low-cycle fatigue
damage lies in the physical differences
between the characteristics of creep failure
and low-cycle fatigue during the strain cycle.
In creep failure, materials develop defects
in features such as grain boundaries, over
time and under the application of steady
stresses and temperatures, due to the
gradual accumulation of strain by diffusional
processes. Creep-resistant materials are
developed with large-grain structures to
minimize the potential for the onset and
accumulation of damage, which generally
appears at the grain boundaries.
Low-cycle fatigue, in comparison, is
characterized by the accumulation of micro-
cracks, which appear in regions of high strain.
These micro-cracks then coalesce to form
large cracks and these can propagate quickly
through the grain structure. Low-cycle fatigue-
resistant materials are typically developed
with small grain structures to cut the potential
for crack growth in any given cycle.
Analysis typically focuses on up to
ten components where, should they fail
prematurely, a safety-critical or financially
unacceptable impact would result. Each
component is modelled using a Finite Element
Model (FEM), which accurately represents
its geometry, its interaction with matingcomponents, and its load cycles. The FEM
model is then subjected to startup, steady
state, and cool-down cycles of thermal and
mechanical loads, and the results measured.
Typically, the models are non-linear to enable
them to accurately represent the gaps, friction
and material yield and creep deformation that
generally occur in hot gas path components.
Post-processing of the resulting strain cycle
produces a calculation of the damage
accumulated during each cycle type.
Methods for calculating the damage differ
depending on the material, and are based
on either ductility exhaustion or strain energy
density. For ductility exhaustion, its essential
Turbine trauma:the riskof the start-stop cycle
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=10&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
13/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 11Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
Gas turbine maintenance
that we understand the dependence of the
materials ductility on complex variables,
including strain rate and temperature.
Alloys, for example, will usually have greaterductility at high strain rates than at low strain
rates. Thus, whether strains occur during long
periods of constant load or during loading
cycles will affect the damage calculation. The
available ductility of the material is gradually
used up as the strain accumulates during a
constant load period or a start/stop cycle,
until eventually it is fully exhausted.
Similarly, strain energy density-based
methods will calculate the work undertaken
by the material each time it goes through a
load cycle. From this analysis we can develop
a detailed understanding of how damage
accumulates during varying load cycles and
periods of constant load. This, in turn, provides
us with significant insights into, and a deeper
understanding of, the effects that result from
different operating regimes.
With analysis demonstrating the low-cycle
fatigue and creep stresses that multi-starts
impose upon components, and the resulting
impact that this has on their lifespan, this poses
several issues for operators. The first is the need
to be aware of the damage taking place, so
that regular inspection, maintenance and
replacement can be factored into assetmanagement strategies and schedules.
Consideration of the bigger picture,
however, poses a more complex question:
Are multi-starts cost-effective do the overall
financial benefits really outweigh the costs of
regularly ramping up the turbines so quickly?
Taking the damage that is being caused to
assets together with associated costs such
as time lost to equipment shutdowns and
time spent in repair activity by staff into
consideration, an operators apparent profit
could be significantly eroded.
Of course, apart from the financial aspects,
operators must consider the potential health
and safety implications of asset damage.
As component stresses begin to occur,
the possibility of a premature catastrophic
equipment failure increases. These failures
might involve blades, veins or even discs, and
could cause both internal damage to the
turbine and damage to surrounding areas.
Thus the problem facing industrial gas
turbines is clear. Designed for creep resistance,
using creep-resistant materials suitable for
machines which base load with minimal
start/stop cycles, the introduction of severefatigue cycles into the mix poses a significant
challenge to their long-term health.
It is imperative that operators recognize
that gas turbine multi-starts may be resulting
in more damage than they are aware of. This
knowledge may then need to be taken into
account when considering the electricity
price at which generation is economical.
With the challenges already facing the
energy market, the issue of asset damage
due to multi-starts needs to be considered by
both operators and governments to ensure
that generators are not disadvantaged. With
the need for flexibility in energy provision, gas
turbine generation must remain viable.
Gary Lockis Senior Business Manager at
Frazer-Nash Consultancy.
www.fnc.co.uk
Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
for more information
Effective Damping
Control vibrations and shiftcritical speeds with ISFDtechnology, an integralsqueeze film damper.
Long-Lasting Seals
Minimize leakage gaps withcustom and reverse engineeredbrush seal solutions.
Optimized Bearing Designs
Reduce power loss, increaseload capacity and achievesuperior dynamic performancewith specialized thrust andjournal bearings.
Choose Waukesha Bearingsfor performance you can trust.
www.waukeshabearings.com/TurbineSolutions
For more information, enter 8 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.waukeshabearings.com%2FTurbineSolutionshttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fnc.co.ukhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=11&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
14/5212 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Retrofits & upgrades
Improving gas
turbine performancewith dry air injectionIn the Middle East, gas turbine efficiency at high ambient temperatures is crucial. Ademonstration project in Saudi Arabia installed a dry air injection system upgrade
with the aim of improving fuel efficiency, writes Tildy Bayar
Demand for fuel oil for power
generation during a Saudi
Arabian summer reaches
between 420,000 and
430,000 barrels per day.
With 58 per cent of global
use, the nation is the worlds largest user of
crude oil for generating power. Iraq, Kuwait
and the UAE were ranked third, fourth and
fifth respectively; together with Saudi Arabia,
these countries account for almost 80 per
cent of the crude oil that is burned for power
generation worldwide.One company says it can potentially offer
gas turbine-based power generators savings
of over 18 million barrels of oil equivalent (or
a 5 per cent fuel efficiency improvement) per
year through its dry air injection system.
Powerphase, with offices in Florida
and Dubai, has one such system, called
Turbophase, installed at a cogeneration
plant in the US. The Morris Cogen plant, which
came online in 1997, is a 177 MW combined-
cycle facility featuring three GE Frame 6B gas
turbines with HRSGs, and a 60 MW steam
turbine. It supplies power and process steam
for a large ethylene manufacturing plant near
Chicago, Illinois. Two Turbophase modules
have been operational at Morris Cogen since
September 2014 and have accumulated over
2000 hours of operation.
In late summer 2015, Powerphase installed
its first Turbophase upgrade in the Middle
East on an operational GE 7FA gas turbine.
The company says it installed the upgrade in
four months in order to meet the customers
summer peak load requirements.
Technology configuration
In simple or combined cycle applications the
skid-mounted Turbophase system consists ofan air compressor driven by a reciprocating
engine and a heat recovery system which
captures the engines exhaust heat and adds
it to the compressor discharge, enabling the
system to match the turbines compressor
discharge temperature.
On combined cycle and cogeneration
systems, the module can be configured with
a steam turbine drive for the air compressor
which enables zero incremental air emissions
and, Powerphase says, helps improve output
from plants which are facing limits on the air
cooled condensers for the steam turbine.
The Turbophase system takes advantage
of the fact that all gas turbines loser power
as ambient temperatures or elevations rise,
explains Bob Kraft, Powerphase president and
chief executive. The system adds the air that
is naturally missing back into the turbine. The
air is injected into one or more of the existing
ports, typically about 5 per cent air, which
results in 10 per cent more turbine power.
We are the first commercial air injection
system available on market, he adds, and for
the next 18 to 20 years we expect to be the
only one because of our patent portfolio.
In the Middle East, he notes, chillers are
competitive with the Turbophase system.Chillers effectively cool the gas turbine inlet
to allow it to generate additional mass flow,
whereas we just generate it with an auxiliary
gas-driven module and drive the air into the
turbine. We do something similar but in a
much different way, and the big difference is
that we generate that air between 30 and 40
per cent more efficiently than the turbine can
generate its own air.
Chillers store cold water for 16 or 18 hours
a day, using the turbines to run an electricity-
driven chilling process. During six peak
daytime hours, the chillers cycle cold water
from a cold tank to a hot tank through the
turbines inlet to produce additional power. In
The Turbophase dry air injection system
Credit: Powerphase
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=12&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
15/52
WWW.PWPS.COM
D O W N T I M E I S N O T A N O P T I O N .
WE DELIVER POWER.
For more information, enter 9 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=13&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=13&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2FWWW.PWPS.COM -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
16/5214 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Retrofits & upgrades
contrast, Kraft says a Turbophase unit can run
24/7. The chiller is running harder at night to
do the storage process and only gets auxiliary
power during the day. The customer generates
about six times the revenue stream with our
system compared to a chiller system.
New aeroderivative gas turbines are also
competitive. These units suffer similar output
reductions due to high ambient temperatures.
Turbophase mitigates, and in some cases
eliminates, the need to install new peaking
gas turbines by providing an alternative at
much better fuel efficiency, Kraft says.
And, he adds, the Turbophase system has
other advantages. Especially in the Middle
East, maintenance is expensive so they try
to drag out their outage intervals. With our
system you get the extra power at the same
internal temperatures to the turbine, so you
dont affect whats going on there. If you dont
need the extra power, if youre operating at
base or part load, you can still use our air in
the system to get the efficiency improvement
but youll also get a secondary benefit: parts
life extensions.
For big companies in the US, this can push
their outage interval from basically a 24,000-
hour interval, which is the normal interval
OEMs offer today, to adding an additional year
or so, from 8000 hours to 32,000 hours. Take a
$5 million outage: instead of every three years
you can do it every four years, and youve
avoided lost revenue from the downtime.
Project specifications
The installation in Saudi Arabia was designed
to demonstrate the Turbophase systems
performance at high ambient temperatures.
The project was operational between mid-July
and early October 2015.
Powerphase requested any F-class units
for the installation of its system, and a GE-
MS7001FA-(7FA.03) gas turbine was selected.
Depending on the vintage of the turbine,
Kraft says, a B-class GT, whether a GE, Siemens,
Mitsubishi, those were developed and
delivered in the 1960s and 70s. In the 70s and
80s there was the E-class; the next generation
of GTs out there in significant quantity are the
D and E classes. In the 90s the F class came
out, and now in the 2010 frame and above,
the H and J class. Those GTs basically have
an increased firing temperature, which is the
temperature that the GT inlet sees.
The efficiency of the GT and the CCGT are
directly proportional to the firing temperature.
So basically, for every unit of air that the GT
pumps through it with the compressor, it
makes more power in the turbine and steam
turbine with the elevated firing temperature.
The reason we like the F-class units is
because they are today considered mature-
frame GTs, so there are a lot of competitors
out there supplying parts and services
and customers are used to operating and
maintaining those GTs. So we can sell a
third-party product to them and they feel
comfortable putting it on.
Our box works on every GT on the planet,
but on those B-class machines it might make
3 MW per box whereas on a J machine it
will make 6 MW per box with the same fuel
consumption and air output.
On more advanced frames you will see
some of the OEMs offering our equipment.
This business works nicely with OEM offerings.
It could be viewed as a competitive product
because OEMs like to upgrade their GTs,
however its such a unique product and we
see OEMs moving towards putting it on their
engines, either in new or existing offerings, onboth mature and advanced fleet GTs.
Due to schedule constraints, it was decided
to not install a complete system consisting of
five or seven Turbophase modules (TPMs)
on a single F-class turbine. Instead, two TPMs
were installed to demonstrate performance
and the resulting values were extrapolated to
model a complete system.
In May, before the installation of the TPMs,
a boroscope inspection of the compressor,
combustor, turbine and exhaust was carried
out. The compressor, combustor and exhaust
were found in the expected condition for the
turbines operating hours. The turbine portion,
however, was heavily eroded, with significant
gaps between stationary and rotating parts.
The customers engine was about ready
to go into outage so they basically took a GT
that they were going to do a major overhaul
on anyway and let us install there, says Kraft,
adding that we made our incremental power
and efficiency even on a GT that was basically
worn out. It was a little risky if the GT broke, we
would get blamed. Because of our extensive
background on this type of gas turbine, we
were confident that even though the GT was
heavily deteriorated, there wasnt going to be
any failure.
The go-ahead for the project was given in
early March, and in mid-July the first injection
was made. Due to the short time period
available, Powerphase needed to adapt
some of the auxiliary systems. The TPMs power
supply was planned to be provided from the
turbines motor control centre (MCC). Due to
logistics issues with material deliveries and
cable installation from the MCC to the TPM
location, which was some distance from the
plant, it was decided to use diesel generators
to supply the required power.
This choice worked out well for us, from two
perspectives, Kraft says. One, it was very easy
for the customer to look at the diesel gensets
power output and be able to calculate
that the Turbophase modules electricity
consumption was on the order of 35 kW, which
is about 0.5 per cent of the power that we
make. So our box makes 4.5 MW; 99.5 per centof that goes to the grid and 0.5 per cent goes
to internal loads if its hooked up to a power
plant electrical system. In this case it was all
to the grid, but the customer could easily see
what the power draw was and we also had
a cooling system that took some power. But
most of our installations are going to be of a
nature where the plant is providing cooling
water, so the auxiliary load is just the module.
A second benefit: the customer is able
to get comfortable with what happens if our
system trips offline. Our diesel genset ran low
on oil or had some issue and quit running in
the middle of the night while we were injecting
air, so we had an unplanned trip test. The
Number of TPMs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Incremental power MW 4.50 9.00 13.50 18.00 22.50 27.00 31.50
GT HR improvement % 0.70 1.40 2.10 2.80 3.50 4.20 4.90
Figure 1. Predicted incremental output with additional TPMs on the gas turbine (5% air flow) at 2420F firing
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=14&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
17/52For more information, enter 10 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=mailto%3Apps%40ethosenergygroup.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ethosenergygroup.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=15&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
18/5216 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Retrofits & upgrades
customer wanted to make sure we were not
going to harm their GT if something goes afoul
on our end, and we were able to prove that by
shutting off the fuel to our system.The expected performance for the two
TPMs was calculated based on the turbine
model type and a constant firing temperature
of 2420F.
z Expected Output: 4.5 MW incremental
power for one TPM, 9 MW in total for both;
z Minimum Output: 4.05 MW incremental
power for one TPM, 8.10 MW for both;
z Heat Rate:Consistent with 5 per cent plant
heat rate improvement.
Based on the 5 per cent plant heat rate
improvement from a full TPS installation, the
predicted heat rate improvement per TPM was
around 0.7 per cent at 4.5 MW incremental
output and 2420F firing temperature.
Firing temperature impacts the turbines
output, which is defined as MW/(lb/s). The
higher the firing temperature, the more output
per lb/s of air flow and the more additional
output per lb/s of air and steam injection.
The OEMs design data for the GE-
MS7001FA-(7FA.03) specifies performance at
a firing temperature of 2420F. However, due
to its degradation, Powerphase estimated
that the turbine was actually operating
at a firing temperature of 2370F. This was
confirmed in site operations and validated
with a ThermoFlow model matching the site
operating conditions. This deviation had an
impact on both the turbines and the TPMs
performance. Powerphase noted that, if the
turbine had been firing at 2420F as designed,
the incremental output per TPM would have
increased by 0.2 MW.
Hitting targets
The initial performance test was conductedon 28 July. The Turbophase system achieved
its output and heat rate targets of 4.5 MW per
TPM and 5 per cent heat rate improvement
for a full installation. These values are based
on the measured performance corrected for
firing temperature and extrapolated to a full
installation. Every day the system was turned
on and off and you could see the incremental
power and efficiency, says Kraft.
At the customers request, a second
performance test was conducted in early
September and confirmed the results of the first
test. In both cases, the upgrade demonstrated
that a full installation of seven TPMs per turbine
would produce a 5 per cent fuel efficiency
improvement and 31.5 MW power increase
on the 7FA gas turbine. Additionally, the
system demonstrated as high as 99.3 per
cent availability in ambient conditions upto 55C. The fuel efficiency improvement was
demonstrated at both baseload and part-
load operating conditions.
The turbine was set to baseload select for
the duration of the performance test. During
the testing the fuel gas compressors were
operational, which ensured a ~50 psi delta
pressure across the turbines stop ratio valve
(SRV) at all times. The generator readings were
recorded as found. However, the recorded
values for single TPM injections included
the other TPM in cool-down/standby mode,
which added another ~40 kW. The cooling
water system was also running double to
support both TPMs even when only one was
operational. For these reasons, the generator
loading recorded values were divided by two
to provide more accurate results, as if only one
TPM was operating.
During commissioning of the TPM,
injection tests were performed at various inlet
conditions. A change in inlet temperature
resulted in a change in gas turbine base
output. Much care was taken to go through
the data and match up inlet temperatures as
closely as possible to show the incremental
output at the same temperature. OEM inlet air
temperature correction factors were not used,
as they would scale the incremental output
up or down.
It was also observed that there were swings
in the turbines fuel flow for constant turbine
output, which would indicate that either the
flow meter had some drift or fuel content was
swinging during the testing.
After the first injection into the turbine the
hot commissioning phase was conducted,followed by the performance test. The first two
weeks after the performance test were used to
address commissioning issues on the system.
In the weeks of operation, about 3.2 GWh
were produced by the TPMs and provided
to the grid. The TPMs availability was above
97 per cent.
At the as-found condition of the turbine,
each TPM added 4.25 MW at 8650 BTU/kWh
to the GT, for a total of 8.5 MW at 8100 heat
rate. (The fuel flow readings from the gas
turbine OEM flow meter are not accurate or
stable enough to confirm the heat rate output.
Performance calculations showed the heat
rate closer to 8000 BTU/kWh.)
By extrapolating the TPMs output from the
current firing temperature of 2370F to the
design point of 2420 F, the output increases to
4.5 MW at 7600 BTU/kWh heat rate.An installation of five modules would
result in an output increase of 22.5 MW. At an
ambient temperature of 50C, this results in a
19 per cent output increase and 3.5 per cent
heat rate improvement.
An installation of seven modules would
result in an output increase of 31.5 MW. At
50C ambient temperature, this results in a
26 per cent output increase and a 5 per cent
heat rate improvement.
A new business model
A turbine has to be down for six weeks or
more if youre installing a new hot gas path
or putting on an inlet cooling system youre
basically building a power plant, Kraft says.
Our system can load follow at the end of
the day its really just a reciprocating engine
driving the process, so we can move it around
quickly we have one air pipe that hooks to
the GT and, in both installations so far, outage
has been less than one day. So when the
plant is down for something else, we tie in
and were done. There can be a month or
two of relatively minor site work, the primary
piece being the air pipe and fuel line. So its a
really simple installation and leads to unique
opportunities in that we can do something like
the aircraft business does: power by the hour.
Most engines on airplanes are leased
rather than owned, he explains. You run it
for a certain number of hours and turn it in,
get a new one, and keep going like leasing
a car. Our system is extremely quick to install
or uninstall; the installation part is typically
between 5 and 10 per cent of the overall cost
to the customer, and we offer a leasing model.If youre putting an inlet chilling system
on a GT youre buying it, and its only good for
that GT. Our system works on all of the GTs at
the plant that its piped to; we can pipe it to
all of them, and you can lease it for a short
period of time while building a new plant or
just for the summer. This business model hasnt
been around the large frame GT business
ever. There have been businesses like this for
the aeros several of the OEMs offer mobile or
relatively mobile aeroderivative engines but
nothing on large frame GTs.
Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
for more information
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=16&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=16&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
19/52For more information, enter 11 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=17&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Ffincantieri.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=17&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
20/5218 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Gas turbine filtration
Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
The cost of
ineffective filtrationWhen selecting a high efficiency particulate air filtration solution, what factors
need to be considered to optimize turbine efficiency, reduce maintenancefrequency and give a better overall return on investment for a particular
installation? Steve Hinerhas some answers.
Gas turbine inlet filter
performance directly
impacts the efficiency of
the turbine plant in terms
of power output and
heat rate loss.
Turbines consume vast amounts of air
and an effective inlet filtration system is
vital to maintaining optimum performance
and reducing the need for maintenance
shutdowns. Ineffective filtration solutions will
lead to problems in turbine performance that
will require operator intervention. The level
of impact will depend upon environmental
conditions on-site and this means that afiltration solution needs to be designed with
an understanding of the local installation
conditions. Depending where the turbine
is installed, the filtration system may need
to handle sand, salt, dust, hydrocarbons,
moisture or even snow and ice.
Fine particles entering a turbine can stick
to turbine blades. This creates fouling which, as
it builds up, affects the turbines aerodynamic
performance. As output power reduces and
heat rate rises, the operator will need to take
the turbine offline to wash the compressor and
restore its performance. The reduced turbine
efficiency and the lost production time when
it is taken offline have large cost impacts in
terms of lost MW output and more fuel burned.
High efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters
offer greater levels of protection and so, in
theory, will help to improve plant performance.
However, the use of finer filters also presents
challenges in terms of filter life. It has been
shown that standard filter efficiency ratings
from standardized laboratory-based filter
testing do not necessarily result in the same
performance when operated in the real world.
Moisture and hydrocarbons found at site can
cause sudden blockages that may result in
pressure loss spikes and equipment downtime
or damage.
Comparing performance
Filter solutions may generally use either
microfibre glass (glass fibre) or membrane
media, typically ePTFE, to achieve higher
HEPA efficiency. Microfibre glass has
historically been the more popular choice
in industrial environments as it offers robust
and predictable filtration performance. ePTFE
membrane technology is relatively new to this
application, so how can operators determine
which is best for their installation?
Both microfibre glass and ePTFE media
types can achieve HEPA level performance
with (H)EPA ratings of E11 or E12 to the
international standard EN1822. Fundamentally,
a higher filter efficiency requires finer media to
filter out smaller particulates.
One of the differences between microfibre
glass and ePTFE is the thickness of the media
used to achieve this. Microfibre glass filters use
a deeper filtration layer whereas membrane
solutions use a single, very thin layer. The
problem is that the reduced total filtration
volume means membrane technology can
be more sensitive to blockage from moisture
and hydrocarbons.
Hydrocarbons can find their way into a
turbine inlet as the result of many processes,
including the by-products of combustion such
as soot or unburnt fuel, oil vapour from lubeoil vents, and general atmospheric pollution.
When combined with moisture they can cause
filters to block and, if the filter is not designed to
handle this, blockages may occur very quickly
and without reasonable warning. As the
turbine strives to suck the air it needs through
its inlet, the filter blockage causes an increase
in pressure drop. Sudden pressure loss spikes
can result in costly unscheduled downtime or
even damage to machinery or ductwork.
ePTFE membranes have a thin, two-
dimensional layer of high efficiency media
which can quickly become blocked by
moisture droplets. This media has been shown
to be prone to sudden blockages and high
A comparison of two gas turbines operating side-by-side at the same site shows the impact filtration can have
Credit: CLARCOR
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=18&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
21/52
Successfully proven in commercialoperation: the H-class from Siemens.Outstanding flexibility meets groundbreaking efficiency.
siemens.com/gasturbines
For more information, enter 12 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=19&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=19&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fsiemens.com%2Fgasturbines -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
22/5220 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
differential pressure spikes. Plugging has been
seen to occur anywhere from as little as three
weeks after installation and requires urgent
remedial maintenance to prevent wider
system damage. It is this unpredictability which
means further research and development into
this type of technology is required to make it
more robust for heavy industrial applications.
Microfibre glass media is around ten times
thicker than a typical ePTFE membrane. Its
greater pore volume makes it naturally less
prone to sudden blockages, while its depth
maintains an equivalent high particulate
efficiency. Any pressure loss increase across
the system has been proven to happen
much more slowly than with ePTFE, givingthe operator plenty of time to take action
and making this type of media much more
predictable in its performance.
Why is the thicker media with greater pore
volume less prone to blockage when moisture
is present? First, lets define the moisture that
causes the problems. High humidity does not
necessarily create an issue as this is not in
droplet form and passes through the system
with the air. If there is a lot of water, perhaps
due to heavy rain, this is also not generally a
problem as the large water droplets bounce
off the filter or drain down the surface of the
media.
Mist and fog, however, have droplets that
are of a comparable size to the fine particles
filtered by HEPA filters and so a mist or fog
event is equivalent to a sandstorm of very
fine particles causing similar effects in the
filter, where the droplets get into the media
and clog it. Liquid droplets, once within the
matrix of the media, combine and would
normally drain out, but when a filter is loaded
with hydrocarbon, this changes the surface
tension on the media fibres. The water droplets
are then more likely to cling to the fibres and
remain within the media matrix, causing
blinding and a high pressure loss.
Filter construction
Microfibre glass and membrane technologyachieve high efficiency filtration in different
ways. Microfibre glass media uses its depth to
capture particles which have to travel through
a tortuous path inside the matrix. Membranes,
however, use a thin layer of finer pores which
create a sieving effect. This means the pores
inside the microfibre glass media are larger
and small water droplets are more likely to
work their way through and, even if they
remain within the media, they are less likely to
plug the higher volume of larger pores.
As well as selecting an appropriate media
type, filters also need to be robust to ensure
their reliability. If particulates are allowed to
bypass the filter media, its efficiency rating is
useless.
Using the right glue, avoiding glue beads
that may fall off once a filter is installed, and
ensuring that the overall filter design is robust
are important considerations. Features such as
seamless gaskets on filters also help to prevent
leaks during operation. Frame materials
should always be selected to handle the
installations environmental conditions and
designed to remain robust after aging.
One problem operators face when
selecting a filtration solution is that standard
efficiency ratings do not necessarily reflect
how a filter will perform in the real world.
Current ratings are based on laboratory
testing that does not cover the wide variety ofconditions and environments a turbine may
be subjected to.
Take, for example, the hydrophobicity of a
filter: its ability to prevent liquid and salts from
passing through, causing turbine corrosion
and accelerated fouling. This should be a
major consideration for the power industry,
but there is no industry standard test to
rate the performance of a filter in this area.
CLARCOR uses a patented hydrophobic test
to determine the performance of its filters. It is
designed to test areas such as salt leaching
and takes the filter through a total of nine wet/
dry cycles within a ten-day protocol to simulate
filter performance in real-world installations.
Gas turbine filtration
Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
Fibreglass is able to handle moisture better than membrane due to its thickness
Credit: CLARCOR
The difference between filters that are both
classified by manufacturers as hydrophobic
Credit: CLARCOR
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=20&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
23/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 21
Gas turbine filtration
Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
A major gas turbine supplier recently carried out comparative tests
on the performance of equivalent ePTFE membrane and microfibre
glass HEPA products. The tests covered overall efficiency, pressure loss,
hydrophobic performance, wet performance and the dust-holdingcapacity of each technology. Microfibre glass filters showed equal or
better performance than ePTFE at a lower cost. The gas turbine supplier
then chose the microfibre glass filter as its filter of choice for its next-
generation technology.
Overall, the real-world performance of gas turbine filters has
shown that, for the moment, microfibre glass technology offers a more
predictable and reliable solution than membranes such as ePTFE
media. It offers a higher pore volume which is less sensitive to plugging
with moisture and hydrocarbons while providing the same dust filtration
efficiency.
The predictable nature of microfibre glass filters means they have a
much longer life, with a gradual increase in pressure loss over time that
is less likely to trip turbines or require unexpected maintenance. They
offer a robust, lower-cost, longer-life (H)EPA filter solution.
Although ePTFE membrane filters can offer a typical lifespan of
two years, this is much shorter than microfibre glass equivalents. The
unpredictable nature of membrane filters further means they require
much closer monitoring and any change-out needs to happen
quickly to avoid damage to other systems. Overall, they may currently
appear to offer a good solution, but operators should take into account
maintenance frequency and lifetime costs when considering their
selection.
What may the future hold?
Industry experience indicates that microfibre glass technology offers
operators greater peace of mind with regard to predictable, reliable
turbine output.
For this reason, CLARCOR does not currently recommend the
use of ePTFE media on turbine installations. CLARCOR is an in-house
manufacturer of ePTFE membrane, uses it successfully in many of its
other filtration products, and would like to be able to provide it for GT
inlet filtration but the global diversity in ambient air contaminants
makes its performance just too unpredictable today for use with gas
turbines.
As membrane technology continues to be developed, however,
improvements in its sensitivity to moisture and hydrocarbons may well
make it a good option in the future. Other materials such as nanofibresalso continue to be developed. These are synthetic polymer-based
media very similar to microfibre glass that may soon offer a further
viable alternative solution with HEPA filtration efficiency levels.
Testing standards continue to be researched and developed for
the implications of different environmental factors on the performance
of a filter and, therefore, the performance of turbines is more clearly
understood. Hopefully, in the near future, standards will give operators
a more comprehensive evaluation of how a filter will operate in the real
world.
Steve Hiner is Chief Engineer, Gas Turbine Inlet Systems at CLARCOR
Industrial Air. www.clarcorindustrialair.com
Visit www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
for more information
INDUSTRIAL ELEVATORS
www.geda.de
Efficiency.Made in Germany
INDUSTRIAL ELEVATORS
GEDAs state of the art industrial rack &
pinion elevators have been specially de-
signed for industrial use, including the
power generation industry, where there is
a growing need for safe, reliable vertical
transportation of personnel and material.
GEDA can offer several elevator options
to meet the service requirements of the
power generation industry including
boilers, chimneys, FGD, SCR, transfer
towers, crusher buildings, fly ash silos,and precipitators.
For more information, enter 13 at pei.hotims.com
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fpei.hotims.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geda.dehttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clarcorindustrialair.comhttp://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=21&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
24/5222 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle
Manufacturer ModelGross output
(MW)Heat rate(kJ/kWh)
Gross efficiency(%)
Shaft speed (rpm)Pressure
ratio
Ansalso Energia
AE64.3A 78 9917 36.3 3000/3600 18.3AE94.2 185 9945 36.2 3000 12
AE94.2K 170 9863 36.5 3000 12
AE94.3A 310 9045 39.8 3000 19.5
AE-T100 0.1 12,000 30 70,000 4.5
GE
TM2500 34.3 10,197 35.3 3000 24.5
LM2500 23.8 10,606 33.9 3000 19
LM2500 DLE 22.4 10,167 35.4 3000 18.1
LM2500+ 30 10,154 35.5 3000 23.1
LM2500+ DLE 31.1 9674 37.2 3000 23.6
LM2500+ G4 34.5 10,209 35.3 3000 24.6
LM2500+ G4 DLE 33.4 9671 37.2 3000 24
LM6000PC 45.4 8973 40.1 3627 29.7
LM6000PC Sprint 51.1 8922 40.4 3627 31.5
LM6000PF 45 8573 42 3627 30.1
LM6000PF Sprint 50 8580 42 3627 31.6
LM6000PG 56 8974 40.1 3911 33.5
LM6000PG Sprint 59 9035 39.8 3911 34
LM6000PF+ 53 8603 41.8 3911 32.1
LM6000PF+ Sprint 57 8693 41.4 3911 34
LMS100PA+ 114 8319 43.3 3000 42.5
LMS100PB+ 108 8204 43.9 3000 42.2
6B.03 44 10,740 33.5 5163 12.7
6F.01 52 9369 38.4 7266 21
6F.03 82 9991 36 5231 16.49E.03 132 10,403 34.6 3000 13.1
9E.04 145 9717 37 3000 12.3
GT13E2 2005 185 9524 37.8 3000 16.9
GT13E2 2012 203 9474 38 3000 18.2
9F.03 265 9517 37.8 3000 16.7
9F.04 281 9316 38.6 3000 16.9
9F.05 299 9295 38.7 3000 18.3
9F.06 342 8768 41.1 3000 20
9HA.01 429 8483 42.4 3000 22.9
9HA.02 519 8440 42.7 3000 23.8
TM2500 37.1 9676 37.2 3600 24.7
LM2500 24.8 10,265 35.1 3600 19
LM2500 DLE 23.2 9830 36.6 3600 18
LM2500+ 31.8 9761 36.9 3600 23.1
LM2500+ DLE 31.9 9269 38.8 3600 23.1
LM2500+ G4 37.1 9676 37.2 3600 24.7
LM2500+ G4 DLE 34.5 9188 39.2 3600 23.6
LM6000PC 46 8924 40.3 3600 29.6
LM6000PC Sprint 52 8909 40.4 3600 31.3
LM6000PF 45 8543 42.1 3600 29.8
LM6000PF Sprint 50 8555 42.1 3600 31.4
LM6000PG 56 8993 40 3905 33.5
LM6000PG Sprint 59 9053 39.8 3905 34
LM6000PF+ 53 8625 41.7 3905 32.1
LM6000PF+ Sprint 57 8711 41.3 3905 34
LMS100PA+ 117 8190 44 3600 42.5
LMS100PB+ 109 8172 44.1 3600 42.1
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=22&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
25/52www.PowerEngineeringInt.com 23Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016
Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle
Exhaustmass flow
(kg/s)
Exhausttemperature
(C)NOx emissions (ppmv)
Weight(tonnes)
DimensionsL x W x H (metres)
Notes
215 573 25 61 5.9 x 3.1 x 3 AE64.3A with gear (gas turbine 90 Hz)555 541 25 233 10 x 4 x 3.7
540 545 25 190 10.2 x 4 x 3.7 Performance with low heating value gas
750 576 25 317 10.8 x 5.1 x 4.9
0.8 270 15 2.77 3.9 x 0.9 x 1.8 Microturbine
92.5 517 25 112 32 x 3 x 4
71.3 530 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection
68.4 547 15 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE
89.5 493 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection
88.8 539 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE
96.6 519 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 Water injection, gearbox
93 552 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 DLE, gearbox
129.7 436 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
135.3 449 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
127.3 457 15 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox
132.7 459 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox
143.4 470 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
144.4 480 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
135.3 500 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox
143.2 490 25 305 20 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox
231.2 422 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection
227 421 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection
145.1 548 4 100 13 x 4 x 4 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz
126.1 603 25 70 6 x 4 x 4 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz
213.2 613 15 100 10 x 4 x 5 Available in 50 Hz & 60 Hz419.1 544 5 214 11 x 5 x 5
415.5 542 15 219 11 x 5 x 5
567.4 505 25 343 11 x 6 x 5
624.1 501 15 350 11 x 6 x 6
665 596 15 308 11 x 5 x 5
667.2 608 15 308 11 x 5 x 5
666.8 642 25 322 11 x 5 x 5
731.2 618 15 386 11 x 5 x 5
826.4 633 25 386 11 x 5 x 5
995.6 636 25 432 12 x 5 x 5
94.6 510 25 112 32 x 3 x 4 Water injection
71.2 525 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection
68.2 539 15 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE
89.3 490 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 Water injection
87 526 25 113 17 x 3 x 3 DLE
96.5 510 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 Water injection
91.5 535 25 113 20 x 3 x 3 DLE
129 440 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection
133.9 455 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection
125.6 461 15 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE
131.4 463 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE
143.3 471 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
144.2 481 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 Water injection, gearbox
135.1 500 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox
143.1 490 25 305 17 x 4 x 5 DLE, gearbox230.7 416 25 897 34 x 24 x 15 Water injection
226.8 418 25 897 34 x 24 x15 Water injection
http://digital.powerengineeringint.com/powerengineeringint/201604/TrackLink.action?pageName=23&exitLink=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerEngineeringInt.com -
7/26/2019 pei201604-dl
26/5224 Power Engineering InternationalApril 2016 www.PowerEngineeringInt.com
Gas Turbine Technical Specifications - Simple cycle
Manufacturer ModelGross output
(MW)Heat rate(kJ/kWh)
Gross efficiency(%)
Shaft speed (rpm)Pressure
ratio
GE(continued)
6B.03 44 10,740 33.5 5163 12.76F.01 52 9369 38.4 7266 21.0
6F.03 82 9991 36.0 5231 16.4
7E.03 91 10,614 33.9 3600 13.0
7F.04 198 9327 38.6 3600 16.7
7F.05 241 9052 39.8 3600 18.4
7F.06 270 8704 41.4 3600 22.1
7HA.01 280 8630 41.7 3600 21.6
7HA.02 346 8525 42.2 3600 23.1
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd
GPB300D 30.1 8977 40.1
9330/5600 (gas
generator rotor/
power turbine
rotor
24.5
GPB180D 18.4 10,526 34.2 9420 18.3
GPB80D 7.8 10,714 33.6 13,800 15.9
GPB70D 6.7 12,000 30 13,800 15.9
GPB50D 4.8 10,905 33
GPB17D 1.7 13,382 26.9 21,965 10.5
MAN Diesel & Turbo SE
THM1304-10N 10.5 11840 30.4 9000 10
THM1304-12N 12.5 11320 31.8 9000 11
MGT6100 6.63 11190 32.2 1500/1800 14
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Ltd
H-25(28) 28.13 10,527 34.2 7280 14.2
H-25(32) 32.3 10,338 34.8 7280 15.4
H-25(35) 37.69 10,288 35 7280 17.7
H-25(42) 42.03 9664 37.2 7280 17.5
H-50 57.45 9508 37.8 5040 19.5
H-100(100) 99.