pefa better understanding trends- wescott--eng

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    1/12

    Understanding trends in PFM

    system performance

    PEFA Open Forum

    ICGFM Miami - May 2012Clay Wescott

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    2/12

    Positive results from Evaluation ofWorld Bank Support to PFM

    Sharp increase in lending: number of operations withPFM components increased by half around 2005

    Increase partly attributable to use of actionableindicators like PEFA, which generate a list of potentialprior actions and technical assistance needs

    Positive results from Bank support: 62% of countriesimproved their PFM rating (CPIA) from 1999-2006,compared to only 25% who didnt receive Bank support

    2

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    3/12

    Considerable challenges remain In 2010, average PFM score for the World Banks

    client countries was less than 60% of the top rating.

    PFM ratings are usually equal or better than for civilservice administration, but never by more than onegrade; civil servants are needed to implement PFM

    Improved PFM takes a very long time to translate to

    improve public services; in the 20th century, it tookthe fastest 20 reformers 20 years to achieve basictransformation of bureaucratic quality.

    3

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    4/12

    Analysis of repeat PEFA assessments Results from 32 countries found better progress

    on formal than functional PFM features

    The difference is greatest where progress can beachieved working with one or a few agencies, incomparison with PFM features where manyagencies are involved.

    Among the functional features, more scores are

    increasing than decreasing, indicating thatreforms are attaining results even in the moredifficult areas.

    4

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    5/12

    Country PFM Systems

    overall performance changes

    5

    Change in score Percentage of indicator

    dimension ratings

    "A" scores maintained 11%Increasing scores 20%

    Maintained "B" or "C" scores 21%

    Decreasing scores 8%

    "D" scores maintained 10%

    Incomparable scores

    (no scores and other reasons) 12+18%

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    6/12

    Classifying PFM elementsFORMAL FEATURES FUNCTIONAL FEATURES

    De jure

    Legislation, intention

    De facto

    Implementation, compliance,

    enforcement

    Upstream in budget cycle

    Planning, budgeting

    Downstream in budget cycle

    Cash management, accounting reporting

    and audit

    Actor concentrationCentral finance agencies only Actor deconcentrationMany government entities involved

    6

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    7/12

    Performance change by feature Actor concentration showed much higher

    performance improvements than actor

    deconcentration

    Upstream and downstream elements of the

    budget cycle performed at equal rate

    De jure elements performed moderately

    better than de facto features

    7

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    8/12

    Performance changes by feature

    8

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    45%

    % increase

    % decrease

    Based on 33 repeatassessments

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    9/12

    Performance changesnetDe jure / facto Up/Downstream Concentration

    Form 28% 21% 33%

    Function 16% 21% 11%

    9

    Conclusions:Much more progress on formal than on functional featuresGap is expanding between actor concentration and deconcentration

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    10/12

    Opportunities and Challenges of using

    PEFA Data

    PEFA indicators are actionable, so cangenerate a list of potential prior actions and

    technical assistance needs

    But, high PEFA scores dont necessarily meanfunctional performance has improved,

    particularly in line ministries, agencies and

    subnational units10

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    11/12

    Improving PFM knowledge sharingbetween practitioners and researchers

    Networks, communities of practice,

    publication in scholarly journals

    Help practitioners apply more robust theory,

    grounded in previous scholarship

    Provide scholars with research opportunitiesleading to actionable recommendations

    11

  • 8/2/2019 PEFA Better Understanding Trends- Wescott--EnG

    12/12

    Enhancing the role of local researchers

    Local researchers have comparative advantage inunderstanding the subtle barriers to institutionalchange in their own countries;

    Local researchers had pivotal role in designing andpromoting market-supportive reforms in Chile, China,Indonesia, South Korea, Taiwan

    Likewise, they could be critical in designing and

    advocating new PFM behaviors that will havetraction.

    Need for outreach, mentoring, twinning to identifyand build up local PFM researchers

    12