pediatric ethics: decision-making conflicts between parents and providers benjamin s. wilfond md...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between
parents and providers
Benjamin S. Wilfond MD
Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center
Professor and Head, Division of BioethicsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington
![Page 2: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Decision making for children for life altering choices
• Do Not Resuscitate(DNR) orders– 6 yo with HIV and candida sepsis
• Withdrawal/withholding nutrition and hydration– 1 wo with Down syndrome and esophageal atresia
• Antibiotics– 10 yo with severe developmental delay and recurrent
pneumonia
• Tracheotomy and long term mechanical ventilation– 2 wo with congenital hypoventilation syndrome– 2 wo with Camptomelic Dysplasia
![Page 3: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Absolutism Relativism
Relationship between Relationship between Parents and ProvidersParents and Providers
![Page 4: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Surrogate decision making for children
• History of pediatric decision making in US
• Standards of judgment for treatment decisions
• Determining the appropriate decision-maker
• Deciding not to employ aggressive measures
• Tolerance of discordant views– Parental refusal of life saving treatments– Parental requests for treatment of lethal conditions
• The role of language in decision making
![Page 5: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
History of pediatric decision making
• Decisions to withhold treatment were routinely made by parents and physicians in the 1970s– Private decision vs public standards
• 1982 - “Baby Doe” - Down Syndrome and atresia
• 1984 - US Baby Doe Regulations
• 1985 - American Academy of Pediatrics
![Page 6: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Standard of judgment for treatment
• Sanctity of Life
• Quality of Life– Independent financial stability Vs permanent coma
• Best interests– Life is more harmful than death from the point of view of the
infant– Children in permanent coma may not have interests
• Relational potential– If interests can not be determined, the potential to form
relationships may provide guidance
![Page 7: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Who should decide?
• Parents
• Providers
• Government agencies
• Ethics committees
![Page 8: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Tolerance of discordant views
Parents viewsParents views
ProvidersProvidersViewsViews
TreatTreat
TreatTreat
Don’t Don’t TreatTreat
Don’tDon’t TreatTreat
![Page 9: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Agreement- Don’t Treat
Parents viewsParents views
ProvidersProvidersViewsViews
TreatTreat
TreatTreat
Don’t Don’t TreatTreat
Don’tDon’t TreatTreat
![Page 10: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Deciding not to employ aggressive measures
• Withdrawing care has advantages over Withholding care
• Killing vs letting die is not a helpful disticntion
• Palliative care is a continuum
![Page 11: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Disagreement- Parents do not want treatment
Parents viewsParents views
ProvidersProvidersViewsViews
TreatTreat
TreatTreat
Don’t Don’t TreatTreat
Don’tDon’t TreatTreat
![Page 12: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Can parents refuse life saving treatments?
• Presumption that parents should make medical decisions for children– Parents promotion of child’s interests (well being)– Parents self determination
• Prince v Massachusetts - 1944(US Supreme Court)– Obligation to protect children may override parents wishes– Freedom of religion does not include exposing child to life threatening
situations
• American Academy of Pediatrics - (1998) – No religious exemptions for child abuse legislation
![Page 13: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Considerations for overriding parental requests to refuse medical treatment
• Harm– Seriousness– Likelihood– Immanency
• Intervention– Effectiveness– Safety
• Alternatives– Feasibility
![Page 14: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Disagreement- Parents want treatment
Parents viewsParents views
ProvidersProvidersViewsViews
TreatTreat
TreatTreat
Don’t Don’t TreatTreat
Don’tDon’t TreatTreat
![Page 15: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Parental request for treatment of “lethal” condition
• Which diseases are lethal?– Asthma– Diabetes– Cystic Fibrosis– Down Syndrome– Tay-Sachs– Trisomy 18 – Anencephaly
• What is lethality?– Likelihood of death– Duration of life– Impact of treatment– Quality of life before death– Ability to have children (Genetic leathality)
![Page 16: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
“Lethal” is a normative concept
• The pediatric equivalent of “futility”
• Providers may not be comfortable stating views about “quality of life” and the “value” of children with special needs
• Lethality medicalizes a normative statement about “quality of life”
• “Cost” and “family burden” may also used as a surrogate for “quality of life”
• Unexamined normative views about children with special needs can influence how information is conveyed
![Page 17: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Familial and social obligations to children with special needs
• Impact on families
• Family obligations (and limits)
• Availability of services
• Financial costs
• Social obligations (and Limits)
![Page 18: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Social and financial obligations to children with special needs• Health care generally costs money, it does not save
money– Health care resources are limited
• Home IV antibiotics• Home mechanical ventilation
– Rationing is an integral aspect of health care
– “Bedside” rationing does not usually result in reallocation of resources to others
• Prioritization of services should be decided collectively– Special concerns about vulnerable populations
• Financial concerns are more acceptable than– “short people got no reason to live”
![Page 19: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Provider/parent Provider/parent agreementagreementProvider supports Provider supports parental decisionparental decision
Provider/parent Provider/parent disagreementdisagreementProvider supports Provider supports parental decisionparental decision
Provider/parent Provider/parent disagreementdisagreementProvider challenges Provider challenges parental decisionparental decision
Provider tolerance for disagreement: expanding the yellow zone
![Page 20: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ProhibitProhibit
Don’tDon’tDiscussDiscuss
RequireRequire
Spectrum of approaches to Spectrum of approaches to influencing health related behaviorinfluencing health related behavior
ActivelyActivelyPromotePromote
Actively Actively DiscourageDiscourage
Provide Provide positivepositive
informationinformation
ProvideProvidenegative negative
informationinformation
FinancialFinancialIncentivesIncentives
FinancialFinancialDisincentivesDisincentives
![Page 21: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The normative component of language
• Subjective and objective information about having children– Disadvantages of having children:
• Sleepless nights, toilet training, and less time for a relationship with spouse
– Disadvantages of having children in Washington DC• Child who may be exposed to gangs, shootings, drugs, teenage pregnancy and
anthrax
• Information presented prenatally vs postnatally may send different messages– Down Syndrome
– Cystic Fibrosis
![Page 23: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The way information is presented reflects the message being sent
A serious lung disease in children
A common cause of hospitalization
Some children may die during childhood
Most children must take daily medications
The disease can limit physical activity and result in frequent school absences
Causes emotional and financial stress on the family
A mild lung disease in children
Most children are not hospitalized
Many have few serious symptoms in childhood
Children can use medication to control symptoms
Most children lead full lives, are physically active, and can do well in school
Most families learn self management of problems
![Page 24: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What condition….. ?• Often associated with behavioral problems
• May have difficulty relating to other children
• May result in marital problems in parents
• May cause problems with siblings
• Proper treatment is very expensive, time consuming and rarely paid by third parties
• However most will become independently functioning adults
![Page 25: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
How to discuss differing views about treatment decisions
• Be aware of personal views– Even “factual information” may not be neutral– Language can be a powerful manipulator
• “Some things must be done delicately”– Be patient and supportive– Share concerns directly– Don’t offer “artificial options”
![Page 26: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Conclusion• Decision-making in the pediatric is challenging
when providers and parents have different views
• Providers should try to be aware of own views
• Providers can influence decisions by how they chose to tell the story
• Providers should participate in broad social discussions to decide
– When to support parental views– How strongly to try to persuade parents– When to actively try to prohibit parental actions
![Page 27: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Pediatric ethics: Decision-making conflicts between parents and providers Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Director, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56649e625503460f94b5d753/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)