pedestrian circulation and safety · 2018. 12. 7. · pedestrian circulation and safety category,...
TRANSCRIPT
2019 PROPOS IT ION K
5 -YEAR PR IOR IT I ZAT ION PROGRAM
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY
Approved: November 27, 2018
Prepared for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority
By San Francisco Munic ipal Transportation Agency
In Coordination with Bay Area Rapid Transi t (BART), Department of Public Works, and
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB or Caltrain)
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Table of Contents
Eligibility
Prioritization Criteria
Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther
Performance Measures
Table 2 - Project Delivery Snapshot
Table 3 - Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table
Table 4 – Prop K 5-Year Project List (FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24)
Project Information Forms
2014 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as adopted)
2014 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as proposed)
Eligibility
Eligibility as identified in the voter approved Prop K Expenditure Plan is as follows:
“Pedestrian Circulation and Safety: Programmatic improvements to the safety and usability of city streets for pedestrians, prioritized as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan. Includes flashing pavement reflectors on crosswalks, pedestrian islands in the medians of major thoroughfares, sidewalk bulb-outs, sidewalk widening, and improved pedestrian circulation around BART and Caltrain stations. Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring agencies: DPT, MUNI, SFPW, BART, PCJPB. The first $23.8 M is Priority 1. The next $1.2 million is Priority 2, and the remainder is Priority 3. Total funding: $69.7 million; Prop K: $52.0 M.”
DPT stands for Department of Parking and Traffic, and MUNI for San Francisco Municipal Railway. DPT and MUNI are now under the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). DPW, now referred to as SFPW, stands for Department of Public Works, BART for Bay Area Rapid Transit, and PCJPB for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain).
Prioritization Criteria
One of the key required elements of the 5YPPs is a transparent process for how projects get selected. Prop K requires at a minimum that each category include prioritization criteria that address project readiness, community support, and relative level of need or urgency. For the 2014 5YPP update, the Citizens Advisory Committee requested that the Transportation Authority and project sponsors develop a user-friendly, transparent scoring table that could apply to all 5YPPs, and that the scoring prioritize safety and community input highly. For the 2019 5YPP update, the prioritization criteria and scoring
1
are unchanged. Table 3 shows the Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table. Each project can receive a maximum of 20 points, with 10 points allocated for programwide criteria and 10 points allocated for category specific criteria.
The Expenditure Plan also requires consideration of geographic equity in terms of project distribution that takes into account the various needs of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. In the 2019 5YPP for this category, SFMTA is proposing to use Prop K funds on projects improving safety on the Vision Zero High Injury Network throughout the City. Vision Zero is San Francisco’s policy to eliminate traffic fatalities by 2024. In order to invest resources where injuries are most concentrated, Vision Zero focuses on the City’s High Injury Network, which represents 12.8% of street miles and accounts for 61% of severe and fatal injuries.
Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther
Leveraging Prop K funds against non-Prop K fund sources (e.g., federal, state, other local funds) is necessary to fully fund the Expenditure Plan projects and programs. For the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax revenue spent, it would be leveraged by about $0.34 in non-Prop K funds. The table below compares Prop K Expenditure Plan assumptions with proposed leveraging in the 2019 5-year project lists.
Table 1. Prop K Leveraging1
Category Expected
Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)
Proposed Leveraging (Non-
Prop K Funds) Pedestrian Circulation and Safety 25% 84.8%
1 This table compares the expected leveraging assumed in the Expenditure Plan with the proposed leveraging assumed in the 5-Year Project List.
This category includes a placeholder for NTIP projects that is not reflected in the proposed leveraging calculation. The actual leveraging will be known once NTIP projects are identified and prioritized for these funds.
Performance Measures
Prop K requires the establishment of performance measures for each programmatic category in the Expenditure Plan. The intent is to demonstrate the system performance benefits of sales tax projects (e.g. reduced transit travel time), to ensure funds are being used cost effectively, and to inform allocation of Prop K funds and programming and prioritization of other funds by the Transportation Authority (e.g. Transportation Fund for Clean Air, Prop AA Vehicle Registration Fee funds).
The goals of the projects within this category are to improve walking safety, accessibility, convenience, and comfort. In order to monitor progress toward achieving these goals, the
2
SFMTA has developed performance measures as part of the Vision Zero Two-Year Action Strategy. The following performance measures enumerate actual infrastructure installed for improving safety.
1. Number of miles of safety treatments installed on the High Injury Network2. Percentage of safety treatment miles installed in Communities of Concern3. Number of intersections improved with accessible (audible) pedestrian signals4. Number and percent of signalized intersections with pedestrian countdown signals
In addition to the pedestrian facility improvements funded through Prop K, there are many other factors that influence safety and circulation. For example, pedestrian circulation is largely linked to land use patterns, and pedestrian safety is impacted by traffic volumes, enforcement actions, and outreach/education programs that are outside of the scope of this Prop K funding category.
3
Tab
le 2
. Pro
ject
Del
iver
y Sn
apsh
otPe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion
and
Safe
ty
5-Y
ear P
riorit
izat
ion
Prog
ram
(5Y
PP) P
erio
d *
Prog
ram
med
(Ava
ilabl
e fo
rA
lloca
tion)
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% A
lloca
ted
2005
5Y
PP (F
Y 2
004/
05-2
008/
09)
3,70
4,49
3$
2,
310,
995
$
18
%20
09 5
YPP
(FY
200
9/10
-201
3/14
)5,
464,
862
$
3,69
1,46
5$
29%
2014
5Y
PP (F
Ys 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
as o
f 7/2
4/20
188,
328,
058
$
6,91
6,97
4$
54%
Tot
al12
,919
,434
$
*U
nallo
cate
d fu
nds a
re c
arrie
d fo
rwar
d fo
r pro
gram
min
g in
the
follo
win
g 5Y
PP p
erio
d.
Tabl
es sh
ow a
lloca
tions
and
per
cent
com
plet
e th
roug
h Ju
ne 3
0, 2
018,
bas
ed o
n pr
ojec
t spo
nsor
s' pr
ogre
ss re
port
s.A
ll Pr
ojec
ts/P
roje
ct P
hase
s (s
orte
d by
allo
catio
n ye
ar, t
hen
spon
sor,
then
pro
ject
nam
e)
Spon
sor
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
e(s)
Fun
ded
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% C
ompl
ete
SFM
TA20
04/0
55-
Yea
r Prio
ritiz
atio
n Pr
ogra
mE
nviro
nmen
tal
92,0
00$
10
0%SF
MTA
2004
/05
Pede
stria
n Is
land
s and
Cro
ssw
alks
Impr
ovem
ents
Des
ign
211,
707
$
100%
SFM
TA20
04/0
5Pe
dest
rian
Proj
ects
- Pe
dest
rian
Safe
Cur
b Bu
lbs
Des
ign
53,0
00$
10
0%BA
RT
2005
/06
Balb
oa P
ark
Stat
ion
Wes
tsid
e E
ntra
nce
and
Wal
kway
Des
ign
25,0
00$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Acc
essib
le P
edes
tria
n Si
gnal
s: C
ityw
ide
Phas
e II
Env
ironm
enta
l38
,788
$
100%
SFM
TA20
05/0
6C
orrid
ors:
Mar
ket S
tree
t Cro
ssw
alk
Res
ptrip
ing
and
Lim
it Li
nes
Con
stru
ctio
n19
,860
$
100%
SFM
TA20
05/0
6In
nova
tive
Dev
ice
Test
ing/
Adj
ustm
ents
Con
stru
ctio
n13
0,77
6$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Med
ian
and
Cur
b R
amp
Acc
essib
ility
Des
ign
54,9
41$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d - P
hela
n A
venu
e C
ross
wal
k Im
prov
emen
tsE
nviro
nmen
tal
35,0
65$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Pede
stria
n C
ount
dow
ns-D
ivisi
dero
Str
eet &
Hay
es S
tree
tE
nviro
nmen
tal
17,0
82$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Pede
stria
n C
ount
dow
ns-G
eary
Bou
leva
rd &
Lag
una
Stre
etE
nviro
nmen
tal
2,31
1$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Pede
stria
n C
ount
dow
ns-V
an N
ess A
venu
eE
nviro
nmen
tal
26,1
62$
10
0%SF
MTA
2005
/06
Pede
stria
n Si
gnal
s -
16th
and
Fol
som
Str
eets
Con
stru
ctio
n20
,816
$
100%
SFM
TA20
05/0
6Pe
dsaf
e C
urb
Bulb
sC
onst
ruct
ion
1,40
3$
10
0%BA
RT
2006
/07
Balb
oa P
ark
Stat
ion
Wes
tsid
e E
ntra
nce
and
Wal
kway
Con
stru
ctio
n21
7,00
0$
10
0%SF
MTA
2006
/07
3rd
Stre
et L
RT
Acc
essib
le P
edes
tria
n Si
gnal
sE
nviro
nmen
tal
192,
074
$
100%
4
Tab
le 2
. Pro
ject
Del
iver
y Sn
apsh
otPe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion
and
Safe
tyA
ll Pr
ojec
ts/P
roje
ct P
hase
s (s
orte
d by
allo
catio
n ye
ar, t
hen
spon
sor,
then
pro
ject
nam
e)
Spon
sor
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
e(s)
Fun
ded
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% C
ompl
ete
SFM
TA20
06/0
7Ph
elan
Ave
nue
Pede
stria
n Im
prov
emen
tsC
onst
ruct
ion
18,6
53$
10
0%SF
MTA
2006
/07
Van
Nes
s Ave
nue
Pede
stria
n C
ount
dow
n Si
gnal
sC
onst
ruct
ion
92,5
33$
10
0%SF
MTA
2007
/08
Acc
essib
le P
edes
tria
n Si
gnal
s Sel
ectio
n &
Des
ign
Env
ironm
enta
l15
9,73
4$
10
0%SF
MTA
2007
/08
Gol
den
Gat
e Pa
rk P
edes
tria
n an
d Bi
cycl
e Im
prov
emen
tsE
nviro
nmen
tal
20,5
31$
10
0%SF
MTA
2007
/08
Ladd
er C
ross
wal
ks M
aint
enan
ceC
onst
ruct
ion
41,9
93$
10
0%SF
MTA
2008
/09
Acc
essib
le P
edes
tria
n Si
gnal
sC
onst
ruct
ion
727,
502
$
100%
SFM
TA20
08/0
9E
ddy
and
Elli
s Sid
ewal
k Bu
lbs
Con
stru
ctio
n50
,000
$
100%
SFM
TA20
08/0
9La
dder
Cro
ssw
alks
Mai
nten
ance
Con
stru
ctio
n62
,065
$
100%
SFM
TA20
09/1
0C
onve
rtin
g St
anda
rd C
ross
wal
ks to
Con
tinen
tal C
ross
wal
ks
Plan
ning
79,9
89$
10
0%SF
MTA
2009
/10
Dub
oce
Ave
nue
Cur
b E
xten
sions
D
esig
n44
,333
$
100%
SFM
TA20
09/1
0D
uboc
e A
venu
e Pe
dest
rian
Impr
ovem
ents
Con
stru
ctio
n17
3,00
0$
10
0%SF
MTA
2009
/10
Pede
stria
n C
ount
ing
Proj
ect
Con
stru
ctio
n54
,853
$
100%
SFM
TA20
09/1
0R
ed V
isibi
lity
Cur
bs
Plan
ning
29,1
35$
10
0%SF
MTA
2009
/10
Re-
open
ing
Clo
sed
Cro
ssw
alks
Pl
anni
ng19
3,32
1$
10
0%SF
MTA
2009
/10
Scho
ol C
ross
wal
k M
aint
enan
ce
Con
stru
ctio
n74
,560
$
100%
SFM
TA20
10/1
1C
onve
rtin
g St
anda
rd C
ross
wal
ks to
Con
tinen
tal C
ross
wal
ksD
esig
n89
,529
$
100%
SFM
TA20
10/1
1N
ew P
edes
tria
n Si
gnal
s D
esig
n15
6,78
4$
10
0%SF
MTA
2010
/11
New
Ped
estr
ian
Sign
als
Env
ironm
enta
l41
,658
$
100%
SFM
TA20
10/1
1Pe
dest
rian
Cou
ntin
gPl
anni
ng25
,000
$
100%
SFM
TA20
10/1
1R
ed V
isibi
lity
Cur
bsD
esig
n29
,743
$
100%
SFM
TA20
10/1
1Sc
hool
Cro
ssw
alk
Mai
nten
ance
Plan
ning
69,2
42$
10
0%SF
MTA
2011
/12
Cro
ssw
alk
Mai
nten
ance
Con
stru
ctio
n56
,577
$
100%
SFM
TA20
11/1
2C
ross
wal
k M
aint
enan
ce
Env
ironm
enta
l14
,397
$
100%
SFM
TA20
11/1
2M
issio
n-G
enev
a Tr
ansit
and
Ped
estr
ian
Impr
ovem
ents
C
onst
ruct
ion
96,4
92$
10
0%
5
Tab
le 2
. Pro
ject
Del
iver
y Sn
apsh
otPe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion
and
Safe
tyA
ll Pr
ojec
ts/P
roje
ct P
hase
s (s
orte
d by
allo
catio
n ye
ar, t
hen
spon
sor,
then
pro
ject
nam
e)
Spon
sor
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
e(s)
Fun
ded
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% C
ompl
ete
SFM
TA20
11/1
2Pe
dest
rian
Ref
uge
Isla
nds
Des
ign
22,1
49$
10
0%
SFPW
2011
/12
Uni
on S
quar
e Pu
blic
Rig
ht-o
f-W
ay A
cces
sibili
ty Im
prov
emen
tsC
onst
ruct
ion
514,
456
$
100%
SFM
TA20
12/1
320
14 5
YPP
Dev
elop
men
tE
nviro
nmen
tal
19,0
00$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
Con
tinen
tal C
ross
wal
ks a
nd R
ed V
isibi
lity
Cur
bsC
onst
ruct
ion
33,2
85$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
Con
tinen
tal C
ross
wor
ksPl
anni
ng19
,393
$
100%
SFM
TA20
12/1
3C
ontin
enta
l Cro
ssw
orks
D
esig
n62
,730
$
100%
SFM
TA20
12/1
3Fr
ankl
in S
tree
t Sig
nal U
pgra
des
Des
ign
68,0
23$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
Man
sell
Cor
ridor
Impr
ovem
ents
Pl
anni
ng11
9,11
2$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
New
Ped
estr
ian
Sign
als
Con
stru
ctio
n86
4,07
7$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
O'S
haug
hnes
sy &
Del
Val
e C
ross
wal
k C
onst
ruct
ion
76,0
26$
10
0%SF
MTA
2012
/13
O'S
haug
hnes
sy &
Del
Val
e C
ross
wal
k D
esig
n27
,992
$
100%
SFM
TA20
12/1
3Si
lver
and
Aug
usta
Isla
nd a
nd B
ulb-
out
Con
stru
ctio
n57
,342
$
100%
SFPW
2012
/13
Sloa
t Bou
leva
rd P
edes
tria
n Im
prov
emen
tsD
esig
n33
,552
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
46t
h St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
Env
ironm
enta
l38
,601
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
46t
h St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
Plan
ning
123,
451
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
47t
h &
8th
Str
eets
Str
eets
cape
Env
ironm
enta
l66
,071
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
47t
h &
8th
Str
eets
Str
eets
cape
Plan
ning
113,
929
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
4Bi
cycl
e &
Ped
estr
ian
Proj
ects
- Sp
eed
& V
olum
e Su
rvey
s Pl
anni
ng21
,500
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
4M
anse
ll C
orrid
or Im
prov
emen
ts
Env
ironm
enta
l44
,130
$
100%
SFM
TA20
13/1
4Pe
dest
rian
Ref
uge
Isla
nds
Con
stru
ctio
n41
,210
$
100%
SFPW
2013
/14
Sloa
t Bou
leva
rd P
edes
tria
n Im
prov
emen
ts
Con
stru
ctio
n96
,825
$
100%
SFM
TA20
14/1
5C
esar
Cha
vez/
Bays
hore
/Pot
rero
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
[NTI
P C
apita
l] Pl
anni
ng44
,686
$
100%
6
Tab
le 2
. Pro
ject
Del
iver
y Sn
apsh
otPe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion
and
Safe
tyA
ll Pr
ojec
ts/P
roje
ct P
hase
s (s
orte
d by
allo
catio
n ye
ar, t
hen
spon
sor,
then
pro
ject
nam
e)
Spon
sor
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
e(s)
Fun
ded
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% C
ompl
ete
SFM
TA20
14/1
5G
olde
n G
ate
Ave
nue
Roa
d D
iet [
Visi
on Z
ero]
Con
stru
ctio
n12
0,00
0$
10
0%SF
MTA
2014
/15
Wal
kFirs
t Con
tinen
tal C
ross
wal
ksC
onst
ruct
ion
278,
854
$
100%
SFM
TA20
14/1
5W
alkF
irst P
hase
1 P
edes
tria
n Sa
fety
Impl
emen
tatio
n [V
ision
Zer
o]
Con
stru
ctio
n80
0,00
0$
10
0%
SFM
TA20
14/1
5W
alkF
irst P
hase
1 P
edes
tria
n Sa
fety
Impl
emen
tatio
n [V
ision
Zer
o]
Des
ign
200,
000
$
100%
SFM
TA20
14/1
5W
alkF
irst R
ecta
ngul
ar R
apid
Fla
shin
g Be
acon
s Pl
anni
ng17
,100
$
100%
SFM
TA20
14/1
5W
alkF
irst R
ecta
ngul
ar R
apid
Fla
shin
g Be
acon
s D
esig
n47
,400
$
100%
SFPW
2014
/15
ER
Tay
lor E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l Saf
e R
oute
s to
Scho
ol
Con
stru
ctio
n6,
575
$
100%
SFPW
2014
/15
Long
fello
w E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l Saf
e R
oute
s to
Scho
ol
Con
stru
ctio
n64
,578
$
100%
SFM
TA20
15/1
6Be
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]D
esig
n3,
795
$
100%
SFM
TA20
15/1
6Be
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l] C
onst
ruct
ion
11,0
72$
10
0%SF
MTA
2015
/16
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
Plan
ning
6,52
5$
10
0%SF
MTA
2016
/17
Wig
gle
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d G
reen
Cor
ridor
C
onst
ruct
ion
572,
100
$
100%
SFPW
2016
/17
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n (T
he
Hai
rbal
l - S
egm
ents
F &
G) [
NTI
P C
apita
l]D
esig
n80
,000
$
100%
7
Tab
le 2
. Pro
ject
Del
iver
y Sn
apsh
otPe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion
and
Safe
tyPr
ojec
ts/P
roje
ct P
hase
s U
nder
way
(sor
ted
by a
lloca
tion
year
, the
n sp
onso
r, th
en p
roje
ct n
ame)
Spon
sor
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
e(s)
Fun
ded
Tot
al A
lloca
ted
% C
ompl
ete
SFM
TA20
14/1
5W
alkF
irst R
ecta
ngul
ar R
apid
Fla
shin
g Be
acon
s C
onst
ruct
ion
158,
400
$
20%
SFM
TA20
15/1
66t
h St
reet
Ped
estr
ian
Safe
ty Im
prov
emen
tE
nviro
nmen
tal
2,01
2,00
0$
75%
SFM
TA20
16/1
7E
lk S
tree
t at S
usse
x St
reet
Ped
estr
ian
Safe
ty Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
Des
ign
80,0
00$
65
%
SFM
TA20
17/1
8Lo
wer
Gre
at H
ighw
ay P
edes
tria
n Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
Des
ign
70,5
00$
75
%
SFM
TA20
17/1
8Lo
wer
Gre
at H
ighw
ay P
edes
tria
n Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
Con
stru
ctio
n17
9,50
0$
0%
SFM
TA20
17/1
8Sa
fe S
tree
ts P
roje
ct E
valu
atio
n Pl
anni
ng13
0,15
0$
35
%SF
PW20
17/1
8A
lem
any
Inte
rcha
nge
Impr
ovem
ent P
hase
2 [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
Env
ironm
enta
l20
,000
$
50%
SFPW
2017
/18
Ale
man
y In
terc
hang
e Im
prov
emen
t Pha
se 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l] D
esig
n38
0,00
0$
0%
SFPW
2017
/18
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n Im
prov
emen
ts (T
he H
airb
all)
[NTI
P C
apita
l] C
onst
ruct
ion
220,
000
$
20%
SFPW
2018
/19
Jeff
erso
n St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
Pha
se 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l]C
onst
ruct
ion
1,41
3,74
0$
0%
For m
ore
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
pro
ject
s fun
ded
by th
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y, a
s wel
l as p
roje
cts f
or w
hich
we
help
ove
rsee
in o
ur ro
le a
s the
Con
gest
ion
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y fo
r San
Fra
ncisc
o, v
isit o
ur in
tera
ctiv
e pr
ojec
t map
at m
ystr
eets
f.sfc
ta.o
rg.
8
Tab
le 3
- Pr
iorit
izat
ion
Crit
eria
and
Sco
ring
Tab
lePe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion/
Safe
ty (E
P 40
)
Proj
ect
Rea
dine
ssC
omm
unity
Su
ppor
tT
ime
Sens
itive
U
rgen
cySa
fety
Prov
ides
B
enef
its to
M
ultip
le U
sers
Hig
h In
jury
C
orrid
orL
ever
agin
gT
otal
Tot
al P
ossi
ble
Scor
e4
33
33
22
20
Gro
ve S
treet
/Civ
ic C
ente
r Im
prov
emen
ts2
30
23
22
14Fo
lsom
-How
ard
Stre
etsc
ape
33
13
32
217
Lake
Mer
ced
Pede
stria
n Sa
fety
10
02
22
18
Leav
enw
orth
Liv
able
Stre
et1
30
32
22
13M
issio
n St
reet
Exc
elsio
r Saf
ety
32
03
32
215
Mon
tere
y St
reet
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ents
10
02
32
210
Visi
on Z
ero
Impr
ovem
ents
Pla
ceho
lder
NTI
P Pl
aceh
olde
rL
ocat
ions
will
be
scor
ed a
t the
tim
e of
allo
catio
n. S
ee te
xt a
nd P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
for m
ore
deta
ils.
Loc
atio
ns w
ill b
e sc
ored
at t
he ti
me
of a
lloca
tion.
See
text
and
Pro
ject
Inf
orm
atio
n Fo
rm fo
r mor
e de
tails
.
Com
mun
ity S
uppo
rt: P
roje
ct h
as c
lear
and
div
erse
com
mun
ity su
ppor
t and
/or w
as it
iden
tifie
d th
roug
h a
com
mun
ity-b
ased
pla
nnin
g pr
oces
s. A
n ex
ampl
e of
a c
omm
unity
-bas
ed p
lan
is a
neig
hbor
hood
tran
spor
tatio
n pl
an, b
ut
not a
cou
ntyw
ide
plan
or a
genc
y ca
pita
l im
prov
emen
t pro
gram
.Th
ree
poin
ts fo
r a p
roje
ct in
an
adop
ted
com
mun
ity b
ased
pla
n w
ith e
vide
nce
of d
iver
se c
omm
unity
supp
ort.
Two
poin
ts fo
r a p
roje
ct w
ith e
vide
nce
of su
ppor
t fro
m b
oth
neig
hbor
hood
stak
ehol
ders
and
gro
ups a
nd c
ityw
ide
grou
ps.
One
poi
nt fo
r a p
roje
ct w
ith e
vide
nce
of su
ppor
t fro
m e
ither
nei
ghbo
rhoo
d st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd g
roup
s or c
ityw
ide
grou
ps.
Proj
ect R
eadi
ness
: Pro
ject
like
ly to
nee
d fu
ndin
g in
fisc
al y
ear p
ropo
sed.
Fac
tors
to b
e co
nsid
ered
incl
ude
adeq
uacy
of s
cope
, sch
edul
e, b
udge
t and
fund
ing
plan
rela
tive
to c
urre
nt p
roje
ct st
atus
(e.g
. exp
ect m
ore
deta
il an
d ce
rtain
ty fo
r a p
roje
ct a
bout
to e
nter
con
stru
ctio
n th
an d
esig
n); w
heth
er p
rior p
roje
ct p
hase
s are
com
plet
ed o
r exp
ecte
d to
be
com
plet
ed b
efor
e be
ginn
ing
the
next
pha
se; a
nd w
heth
er li
tigat
ion,
com
mun
ity o
ppos
ition
or o
ther
fa
ctor
s may
sign
ifica
ntly
del
ay p
roje
ct.
Tim
e Se
nsiti
ve U
rgen
cy: P
roje
ct n
eeds
to p
roce
ed in
pro
pose
d tim
efra
me
to e
nabl
e co
nstru
ctio
n co
ordi
natio
n w
ith a
noth
er p
roje
ct (e
.g. m
inim
ize
cost
s and
con
stru
ctio
n im
pact
s), t
o su
ppor
t ano
ther
fund
ed o
r pro
pose
d pr
ojec
t (e.
g. n
ew si
gnal
con
trolle
rs n
eed
to b
e in
stal
led
to su
ppor
t TE
P im
plem
enta
tion)
or t
o m
eet t
imel
y us
e of
fund
s dea
dlin
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith m
atch
ing
fund
s.
PRO
P K
PR
OG
RA
M-W
IDE
CR
ITE
RIA
CA
TE
GO
RY
SPE
CIF
IC C
RIT
ER
IA
Prio
ritiz
atio
n C
riter
ia D
efin
ition
s:
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty a
nd C
ircul
atio
n Im
prov
emen
ts
Cor
ridor
Pro
ject
s
Lev
erag
ing:
Pro
ject
leve
rage
s non
-Pro
p K
fund
s.Pr
ovid
es B
enef
its to
Mul
tiple
Use
rs: P
roje
ct re
ceiv
es o
ne p
oint
eac
h fo
r add
ress
ing
the
need
s of b
icyc
lists
, mot
orist
s and
/or t
rans
it us
ers.
Hig
h In
jury
Cor
ridor
: Pro
ject
is lo
cate
d on
the
2017
Visi
on Z
ero
Hig
h In
jury
Net
wor
k.Sa
fety
: (O
ne p
oint
for e
ach)
: Pro
ject
add
ress
es d
ocum
ente
d sa
fety
issu
e; re
duce
s pot
entia
l con
flict
s bet
wee
n m
odes
; and
incr
ease
s sec
urity
.
9
2019
/20
2020
/21
2021
/22
2022
/23
2023
/24
Cor
ridor
Pro
ject
sSF
MTA
Gro
ve S
treet
/Civ
ic C
ente
r Im
prov
emen
tsPS
&E
Plan
ned
$200
,000
$200
,000
SFM
TAG
rove
Stre
et/C
ivic
Cen
ter I
mpr
ovem
ents
CO
NPl
anne
d$1
,391
,000
$1,3
91,0
00
SFM
TAFo
lsom
-How
ard
Stre
etsc
ape
CO
NPl
anne
d$9
00,9
63$9
00,9
63
SFM
TALa
ke M
erce
d Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty
PS&
EPl
anne
d$8
0,00
0$8
0,00
0
SFM
TALa
ke M
erce
d Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty
CO
NPl
anne
d$4
00,0
00$4
00,0
00
SFM
TALe
aven
wor
th L
ivab
le S
treet
PLA
N/
CE
RPl
anne
d$7
50,0
00$7
50,0
00
SFM
TAM
issio
n St
reet
Exc
elsio
r Saf
ety
PS&
EPl
anne
d$1
,000
,000
$1,0
00,0
00SF
MTA
Mon
tere
y St
reet
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ents
PS&
EPl
anne
d$2
45,0
00$2
45,0
00C
ityw
ide
Pede
stria
n Sa
fety
& C
ircul
atio
n Im
prov
emen
ts
SFM
TAV
ision
Zer
o Im
prov
emen
ts P
lace
hold
erC
ON
Plan
ned
$1,0
00,0
00$1
,000
,000
SFM
TAV
ision
Zer
o Im
prov
emen
ts P
lace
hold
erC
ON
Plan
ned
$1,0
00,0
00$1
,000
,000
Any
E
ligib
leN
TIP
Plac
ehol
der
Any
Plan
ned
$1,1
00,0
00$1
,100
,000
$2,6
25,0
00
$1,6
50,9
63
$1,7
91,0
00
$1,0
00,0
00
$1,0
00,0
00
$8,0
66,9
63
$625
,674
$7
43,7
33
$783
,857
$8
23,8
67
$865
,795
$3
,842
,926
($
1,99
9,32
6)($
2,90
6,55
6)($
3,91
3,69
9)($
4,08
9,83
2)($
4,22
4,03
7)($
4,22
4,03
7)C
umul
ativ
e R
emai
ning
Pro
gram
min
g C
apac
ity
Tota
l
Fund
s R
eque
sted
in 2
019
5YPP
Fund
s Pr
ogra
mm
ed in
201
9 St
rate
gic
Plan
Bas
elin
e
Age
ncy
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eSt
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear
Prog
ram
min
g
Tab
le 4
- 20
19 P
rop
K 5
-Yea
r Prio
ritiz
atio
n Pr
ogra
m -
Prog
ram
of P
roje
cts
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n an
d Sa
fety
Cat
egor
y (E
P 40
)
10
2019
/20
2020
/21
2021
/22
2022
/23
2023
/24
2024
/25
Cor
ridor
Pro
ject
sG
rove
Stre
et/C
ivic
Cen
ter I
mpr
ovem
ents
PS&
E$4
0,00
0$1
60,0
00$2
00,0
00
Gro
ve S
treet
/Civ
ic C
ente
r Im
prov
emen
tsC
ON
$851
,000
$540
,000
$1,3
91,0
00
Folso
m-H
owar
d St
reet
scap
eC
ON
$900
,963
$900
,963
Lake
Mer
ced
Pede
stria
n Sa
fety
PS
&E
$20,
000
$60,
000
$80,
000
Lake
Mer
ced
Pede
stria
n Sa
fety
C
ON
$200
,000
$200
,000
$400
,000
Leav
enw
orth
Liv
able
Stre
etPL
AN
/ C
ER
$375
,000
$375
,000
$750
,000
Miss
ion
Stre
et E
xcel
sior S
afet
y PS
&E
$500
,000
$500
,000
$1,0
00,0
00M
onte
rey
Stre
et S
afet
y Im
prov
emen
tsPS
&E
$10,
000
$235
,000
$245
,000
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty &
Circ
ulat
ion
Impr
ovem
ents
Visi
on Z
ero
Impr
ovem
ents
Pla
ceho
lder
CO
N$5
00,0
00$5
00,0
00$1
,000
,000
Visi
on Z
ero
Impr
ovem
ents
Pla
ceho
lder
CO
N$5
00,0
00$5
00,0
00$1
,000
,000
NTI
P Pl
aceh
olde
rA
ny$5
50,0
00$5
50,0
00$1
,100
,000
$1,1
20,0
00
$1,8
80,0
00
$1,4
26,0
00
$2,1
40,9
63
$1,0
00,0
00
$500
,000
$8
,066
,963
$6
25,6
74
$743
,733
$7
83,8
57
$823
,867
$8
65,7
95
$0
$3,8
42,9
26
($49
4,32
6)($
1,63
0,59
3)($
2,27
2,73
6)($
3,58
9,83
2)($
3,72
4,03
7)($
4,22
4,03
7)($
4,22
4,03
7)C
umul
ativ
e R
emai
ning
Cas
h Fl
ow C
apac
ity
Cas
h Fl
ow R
eque
sted
in 2
019
5YPP
Cas
h Fl
ow in
201
9 St
rate
gic
Plan
Bas
elin
e
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eFi
scal
Yea
rTo
tal
Cas
h Fl
ow (M
axim
um A
nnua
l Rei
mbu
rsem
ent)
Tab
le 4
- 20
19 P
rop
K 5
-Yea
r Prio
ritiz
atio
n Pr
ogra
m -
Prog
ram
of P
roje
cts
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n an
d Sa
fety
Cat
egor
y (E
P 40
)
11
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:Implementing Agency:
Category:Subcategory: EP Line (Primary):Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:Supervisorial District(s):Project Manager:Phone Number:Email:Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 60% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2016/17 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 60% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2016/17 Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2019/20 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2020/21Advertise Construction
Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% In-house and Contracted Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22
Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure) Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2023/24
District 06, District 05
SFPW-John DennisSF Planning-Nick Perry
Under the direction of SF Planning, the Civic Center Public Realm Plan will create recommended improvements in the City Hall/Civic Center area. Public engagement process, consists of two workshops, online survey, and mobile outreach station to date, and a final open house in Fall 2018. https://civiccentersf.org/about/outreach/
Matt Lasky
701-5228
Project will implement bicycle and pedestrian improvements on Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street. Project includes street design and roadway changes that correlate with the circulation and collision patterns of the area, as well as data analysis, additional outreach, and preparation of conceptual designs for the final plan document. SFMTA will implement several near-term improvements based on analysis of key conflict areas and opportunities effective safety improvements. Following the environmental clearance of the project, SFMTA will work with Public Works to implement more detailed proposed changes.
Start Date End Date
Categorically Exempt
Comments/Concerns
Design and construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements on Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street.
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan InformationC. Street & Traffic Safety
39-Bicycle Circulation/Safety
2019/20, 2021/22
Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street.
Project Information
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Grove Street/Civic Center ImprovementsSan Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
12
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g22
0,00
0$
-
$
220,
000
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-
$
-$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
400,
000
$
400,
000
$
Con
stru
ctio
n3,
600,
000
$
2,78
2,00
0$
81
8,00
0$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
4,22
0,00
0$
3,
182,
000
$
1,03
8,00
0$
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al75
%25
%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Line
Phas
eFu
nd S
ourc
e St
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
Prop
B G
ener
al F
und
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual
Eng
inee
ring
Allo
cate
dPr
evio
us22
0,00
0$
Prop
K39
-Bic
ycle
C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Plan
ned
2019
/20
200,
000
$
40,0
00$
16
0,00
0$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estri
anC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Plan
ned
2019
/20
200,
000
$
40,0
00$
16
0,00
0$
Prop
K39
-Bic
ycle
C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
21/2
21,
391,
000
$
851,
000
$
54
0,00
0$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estri
anC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
21/2
21,
391,
000
$
851,
000
$
54
0,00
0$
Prop
B G
ener
al F
und
Con
stru
ctio
nPr
ogra
mm
ed20
21/2
281
8,00
0$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r4,
220,
000
$
-
$
80,0
00$
32
0,00
0$
1,70
2,00
0$
1,
080,
000
$
-$
Com
men
ts
Gro
ve S
treet
/Civ
ic C
ente
r Im
prov
emen
ts
This
proj
ect p
ropo
ses p
rogr
amm
ing
in b
oth
EP
39 a
nd E
P 40
.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i.
e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
13
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
Yes
District 06
SFPW - Kelli Rudnick
The EN TRIPS effort and the Central Corridor/Central Soma Plan, included robust community outreach and led to recommendations in the project area. While outreach for the project is ongoing, it has already been some of the most extensive ever done on an SFMTA streetscape project. For both the long-term and near-term components, three series of open houses were held comprising six total public meetings attended by over 300 people. Together with online responses and in-person outreach in conjunction with community groups, those efforts generated 1,300 survey responses, many of which were collected in Filipino. The team canvassed the corridor’s local businesses, knocking on all 165 doors that were identified as business locations. The team has met with over 75 businesses and 20 different community groups since the beginning of the project.
The SFMTA has performed concentrated, in-depth outreach to relevant stakeholders to allow the SFMTA to work directly with community-based organizations to obtain further community input from within the SoMa Youth and Family Zone to explore how the Folsom and Howard re-designs can best address pedestrian safety and access to the community assets (e.g. schools, recreation centers, etc.) within the Zone. Tasks from this Prop K NTIP-funded effort include initial stakeholder interviews with Youth and Family Zone leadership, public open houses, and follow-up meetings with stakeholders.
Paul Stanis
415.701.5396
Implementation of better, safer streets on Howard Street between 3rd Street and 11th Street and on Folsom Street between 2nd Street and 11th Street, including improvements to bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, upgrades to traffic signals, traffic circulation modifications, and changes to parking and loading. Project will redesign street couplets that are the cornerstone of the growing SoMa neighborhood. Improvements will include protected bicycle facilities; new corner bulbs and transit islands at intersections reducing pedestrian crossing distances and improving Muni service; transit-only lanes; new signals at midblock locations or alleyways; and construction of raised crosswalks at alleyways.
Categorically Exempt
Implementation of better, safer streets on Howard Street between 3rd Street and 11th Street and on Folsom Street between 2nd Street and 11th Street, including improvements to bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, upgrades to traffic signals, traffic circulation modifications, and changes to parking and loading.
Fact sheet; https://www.sfmta.com/projects/folsom-howard-streetscape-project
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2020/21
Howard between 3rd Street and 11th Sreet & Folsom between 2nd Street and 11th Street.
Project Information
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Folsom-Howard Streetscape
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
14
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 100% In-house and Contracted
Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2015/16 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2016/17
Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 90% In-house and Contracted
Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2016/17 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19
Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2023/24
Start Date End Date
Comments/Concerns
15
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g42
1,75
1$
21
8,75
1$
20
3,00
0$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
1,09
7,00
0$
-
$
1,09
7,00
0$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
6,21
7,80
0$
-
$
6,21
7,80
0$
Con
stru
ctio
n27
,299
,037
$
900,
963
$
26,3
98,0
74$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
35,0
35,5
88$
1,
119,
714
$
33,9
15,8
74$
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al3%
97%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Lin
ePh
ase
Fund
Sou
rce
Stat
us
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
IPIC
- E
aste
rn N
eigh
borh
oods
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gA
lloca
ted
Prev
ious
203,
000
$
Prop
K44
-Tra
nspo
rtat
ion/
Land
U
se C
oord
inat
ion
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gA
lloca
ted
Prev
ious
218,
751
$
21
8,75
1$
IPIC
- E
aste
rn N
eigh
borh
oods
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
Allo
cate
dPr
evio
us1,
097,
000
$
IPIC
- E
aste
rn N
eigh
borh
oods
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Allo
cate
dPr
evio
us6,
217,
800
$
IPIC
- E
aste
rn N
eigh
borh
oods
Con
stru
ctio
nPr
ogra
mm
ed20
20/2
115
,202
,200
$
Prop
A G
O B
ond
Con
stru
ctio
nPr
ogra
mm
ed20
20/2
15,
215,
800
$
TBD
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
20/2
15,
980,
074
$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
20/2
190
0,96
3$
900,
963
$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r35
,035
,588
$
21
8,75
1$
-
$
-$
-
$
900,
963
$
-$
Com
men
ts
Folso
m-H
owar
d St
reet
scap
e
IPIC
- In
tera
genc
y Pl
an Im
plem
enta
tion
Com
mitt
ee (d
evel
opm
ent i
mpa
ct fe
es).
TBD
sour
ces m
ay in
clud
e A
TP, H
SIP,
AH
SC, n
on-I
PIC
dev
elop
er fe
es, o
r new
loca
l rev
enue
sour
ces s
uch
as sa
les t
ax, g
ener
al ob
ligat
ion
bond
fund
s, or
tran
spor
tatio
n ne
twor
k co
mpa
ny (T
NC
) tax
.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
16
FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE PROJECTStreetscape Project Factsheet (Winter 2018)
SFMTA.COM/FOLSOMHOWARD
Why Improve Folsom and Howard Streets?
Folsom and Howard are a part of the High Injury Network, the 12 percent of city streets with 70 percent of the severe and fatal collisions.
Over the last 5 years, 3 people were killed and 308 people were injured on Folsom and Howard streets including:
• 1 Pedestrian fatality on Howard
• 1 Bicyclist fatality on Folsom
• 1 Bicyclist fatality on Howard
What Will The Project Do?
The Folsom-Howard Streetscape Project will make SoMa more livable by making it safer and more pleasant to walk, bike, shop and live along Folsom St. from 11th to 2nd and Howard St. from 11th to 3rd. The project will:
• Improve safety for all users of the corridor
• Make biking and walking in SoMa a morecomfortable experience
• Improve loading for local businesses
• Give transit services priority and elevate their use onthe corridor
Already installed buffered bikeway on Folsom between 11th and 13th (2017)
The full Folsom-Howard Streetscape project including safety and landscaping improvements
Already installed near-term parking-protected bikeway on Folsom between 12th and 5th (2017)
Near-Term Safety Improvements We Have Already Made
While we design long-term changes, we installed parking-protected bikeways, daylighted intersections, and added transit boarding islands on Folsom from 11th to 5th to improve safety.
These improvements support San Francisco’s Vision Zero goal of eliminating traffic fatalities. These changes will improve transit, protect pedestrians and bicyclists by shorten crossing distances and provide more visibility for pedestrians and provide dedicated, protected space for bicyclists.
SFMTA Board approved the changes in October 2017. Construction began in Fall 2017 and will finish in January 2018.
17
FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE PROJECTStreetscape Project Factsheet (Winter 2018)
SFMTA.COM/FOLSOMHOWARD
Folsom and Howard only work if they work for local businesses. After meeting with more than 75 business, we have heard significant concerns about loading. To address these concerns, near-term improvements doubled the number of loading zones on Folsom Street to respond to businesses needs for additional space.
We will continue to work with the business community for the long-term project to try to improve loading along both Folsom and Howard.
Working with Local Business on Loading
Next Steps:• Near-term Improvements
Completed - Winter 2018
• Public Outreach and Open Houses- Winter and Spring 2018
• Planning Certifies Central SoMa EIR -Summer 2018 (tentative)
• SFMTA Board of Directors Approval -Summer 2018 (tentative)
• Detailed Design - 2018 to 2019(tentative)
• Construction - 2020 -2023(tentative)
Changes To Improve Pedestrian, Bicycling and Transit Infrastructure, Comfort and Safety
The proposals for the streets prioritize people by making it safer and more pleasant to walk, bicycle, and take transit on Folsom and Howard. The project will also provide opportunities for greening and public space improvements.
Changes that will improve San Franciscan’s ability to walk comfortably on this commercial corridor include:
• Sidewalks widening from 8th to 4th on Folsom’s north side
• 3 new mid-block crossings on Howard and 4 on Folsom
• Adding daylighting, bulb-outs, pedestrian head-starts
Bike improvements build on the parking-protected bikeway just installed on Folsom, adding barriers, improving intersections and increase connectivity. Changes include:
• New parking-protected bikeway on Howard
• Two-way biking on Folsom between 8th and 11th connectingriders with bike routes in the Mission
• New traffic signals that seperate turning vehicles and bikes
We will bring a transit only lane to Folsom, that coupled with increased service, will decrease travel times for riders and provide better transit connections throughout SoMa.
These changes require reducing parking by 33% on Folsom and Howard but only reduce parking by 9% in a one block radius.
18
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2019/20, 2021/22
Lake Merced Boulevard between Font Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard
Project Information
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Lake Merced Pedestrian Safety
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Improve pedestrian crossings across Lake Merced Boulevard between Font and Sunset Boulevards. This segment is part of the Vision Zero High Injury Network, and would improve access to a major recreational site. Scope of the planning phase will include community outreach to understand current walking patterns and barriers, as well as collision and traffic patterns and an assessment of requirements to update the transit stops up to or beyond minimum standards. Recommendations from the planning phase could include new traffic beacons, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian visibility improvements and transit stop amenities focused on safety.
As required by Community Based Transportation Plan guidelines, the planning phase includes the formation of a community steering committee, outreach activities focused on the communities of concern that are served by the project area, establishing baseline conditions, performing a needs assessment, and developing a prioritized list of projects and implementation plan.
Categorically Exempt
Improve safety for pedestrians crossing Lake Merced Boulevard between Font and Sunset Boulevards. Recommendations to be identified through a community based transportation planning process could include new traffic signals or beacons, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian visibility improvements and transit stop amenities focused on safety.
District 07
As required by Community Based Transportation Plan guidelines, the planning phase includes the formation of a community steering committee and outreach activities focused on the communities of concern that are served by the project area.
Chava Kronenberg
19
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2018/19 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19Environmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2021/22Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2023/24
Start Date End Date
Comments/ConcernsLegislation and environmental determination included in planning phase. This work is ineligible for reimbursement by the $50,000 in CBTP funds or the required $6,000 local match, but may be reimbursed with other local funding above the required local match.
20
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g70
,000
$
-$
70
,000
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-
$
-$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
80,0
00$
80
,000
$
-$
Con
stru
ctio
n40
0,00
0$
40
0,00
0$
-
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
550,
000
$
480,
000
$
70,0
00$
Pe
rcen
t of T
otal
87%
13%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Lin
ePh
ase
Fund
Sou
rce
Stat
us
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
Prop
B G
ener
al Fu
ndPl
anni
ng/C
once
ptua
l Eng
inee
ring
Plan
ned
Prev
ious
20,0
00$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Plan
ned
2019
/20
80,0
00$
20,0
00$
60,0
00$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
21/2
240
0,00
0$
200,
000
$
200,
000
$
Com
mun
ity B
ased
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Prog
ram
- Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g
Prog
ram
med
Prev
ious
50,0
00$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r55
0,00
0$
-
$
20,0
00$
60,0
00$
200,
000
$
200,
000
$
-$
Com
men
ts
Lake
Mer
ced
Pede
stria
n Sa
fety
As C
onge
stio
n M
anag
emen
t Age
ncy
for S
an F
ranc
isco,
the
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
perio
dica
lly re
ceiv
es c
omm
unity
-bas
ed tr
ansp
orta
tion
plan
ning
(CBT
P) fu
nds f
rom
the
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Com
miss
ion.
The
CBT
P fu
nds a
re fo
r com
mun
ity b
ased
plan
ning
ef
fort
s foc
used
in C
omm
uniti
es o
f Con
cern
or t
hat p
rimar
ily b
enef
it C
omm
uniti
es o
f Con
cern
to h
elp
impr
ove
mob
ility
opt
ions
in th
ose
com
mun
ities
. Th
e pr
opos
ed p
roje
ct a
rea
is in
a n
ewly
iden
tifie
d C
omm
unity
of C
once
rn si
nce
the
last c
ycle
of C
BTP
fund
ing.
As a
co
nditi
on o
f rec
eipt
of t
he C
BTP
fund
s, SF
MTA
will
nee
d to
com
ply
with
all
of M
TC's
requ
irem
ents
for t
his g
rant
pro
gram
.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
21
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house and Contracted
Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22
Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 0% In-house and Contracted
Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22
Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
District 03, District 06
TBD
Corridor is included in Tenderloin-Little Saigon Neighborhood Transportation Plan with recommended traffic circulation and pedestrian safety improvements.
Chava Kronenberg
Plan, design, and implement complete street and safety improvements on Leavenworth from McAllister to Post Streets. Project includes robust community engagement process, and will implement recommended safety countermeasures along the corridor, including near-term (paint and sign) and long-term (constructed) improvements, with a focus on safety and livability. Countermeasures may include sidewalk widening, bulbs, crosswalk upgrades, signal upgrades, accessibility upgrades, a new bikeway, and landscaping.
Start Date End Date
Categorically Exempt
Comments/Concerns
Implement complete street and safety improvements on Leavenworth from McAllister to Post Streets. Countermeasures may include sidewalk widening, bulbs, crosswalk upgrades, signal upgrades, accessibility upgrades, a new bikeway, and landscaping.
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2020/21
Leavenworth Street from McAllister to Post Streets
Project Information
44-Transportation/Land Use Coordination
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Leavenworth Livable Street
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
22
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g1,
350,
000
$
750,
000
$
600,
000
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-
$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
-$
Con
stru
ctio
n-
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
1,35
0,00
0$
75
0,00
0$
60
0,00
0$
Pe
rcen
t of T
otal
56%
44%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Lin
ePh
ase
Fund
Sou
rce
Stat
us
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
Calt
rans
Plan
ning
Gra
ntPl
anni
ng/C
once
ptua
l Eng
inee
ring
Plan
ned
2019
/20
200,
000
$
TBD
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gPl
anne
d20
19/2
040
0,00
0$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gPl
anne
d20
20/2
175
0,00
0$
375,
000
$
37
5,00
0$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r1,
350,
000
$
-$
-
$
375,
000
$
37
5,00
0$
-
$
-$
Com
men
ts
Leav
enw
orth
Liv
able
Str
eet
Plan
ned
FY 2
019/
2020
Calt
rans
Plan
ning
Gra
nt a
pplic
atio
n. W
e w
ould
con
sider
a re
ques
t for
loca
l mat
ch to
a C
altra
ns P
lanni
ng G
rant
from
the
Prop
K T
rans
port
atio
n/La
nd U
se C
oord
inat
ion
and/
or a
noth
er P
rop
K c
ateg
ory
shou
ld S
FMTA
be
succ
essf
ul in
its g
rant
ap
plic
atio
n. P
er C
altra
ns, e
arlie
st st
art d
ate
is O
ctob
er 2
019.
TBD
sour
ces m
ay in
clud
e A
TP, H
SIP,
AH
SC, o
r new
loca
l rev
enue
sour
ces s
uch
as sa
les t
ax o
r gen
eral
oblig
atio
n bo
nd fu
nds.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
23
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
District 11
SFPW
Project will build on previous TEP and MuniForward planning efforts on the Mission and Geneva corridors.
Between August 2017 and May 2018, the Mission Street Excelsior Safety Project team held nine one-on-one stakeholder interviews, gathered feedback at four neighborhood group monthly meetings and one PTA meeting, participated in three neighborhood walkthroughs with community groups and residents, represented the project at four Excelsior & Outer Mission Neighborhood Strategy Mobility subgroup meetings and held six meetings with interagency partners. Additionally, the team conducted door-to-door loading surveying between November 2017 and January 2018 and tabled the October 2017 Excelsior Sunday Streets.
Dan Provence
701-4448
Coordinate with the Planning Department-led Outer Mission/Excelsior Strategy to develop feasible plans to improve pedestrian safety and transit reliability on Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street. Project will implement pedestrian safety, Muni reliability, and business enhancements based on a robust community engagement process. Potential improvements may include signals, corner bulbs, transit bulbs, boarding islands, spot bike improvements, loading zone/parking changes.
Through near-term and long-term improvements, the project will make it safer and more pleasant to walk, shop, and live along these corridors. This project includes some scope elements previously included in the 14 Mission Outer Mission Muni Forward project.
Categorically Exempt
Improve pedestrian safety and transit reliability on Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street. Potential improvements may include signals, corner bulbs, transit bulbs, boarding islands, spot bike improvements, loading zone/parking changes.
https://www.sfmta.com/projects/mission-street-excelsior-safety-project
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2019/20
Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street
Project Information
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Mission Street Excelsior Safety
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
24
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 30% In-house and Contracted
Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2017/18 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19
Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 30% In-house and Contracted
Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2017/18 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19
Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2020/21Advertise Construction
Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% In-house and Contracted
Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22
Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2023/24
Planning and PA&ED phases included in single phase for the Cost and Funding Plan.
Start Date End Date
Comments/Concerns
25
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g34
7,00
0$
-
$
347,
000
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-
$
-$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
2,40
0,00
0$
1,
000,
000
$
1,40
0,00
0$
Con
stru
ctio
n9,
650,
000
$
-$
9,
650,
000
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
12,3
97,0
00$
1,
000,
000
$
11,3
97,0
00$
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al8%
92%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Lin
ePh
ase
Fund
Sou
rce
Stat
us
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
IPIC
- Ba
lboa
Par
kPl
anni
ng/C
once
ptua
l Eng
inee
ring
Allo
cate
dPr
evio
us36
,000
$
Prop
B G
ener
al Fu
ndPl
anni
ng/C
once
ptua
l Eng
inee
ring
Allo
cate
dPr
evio
us20
2,00
0$
Gen
eral
Fund
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gA
lloca
ted
Prev
ious
109,
000
$
Prop
B G
ener
al Fu
ndD
esig
n E
ngin
eerin
g (P
S&E
)Pr
ogra
mm
ed20
19/2
01,
400,
000
$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Plan
ned
2019
/20
1,00
0,00
0$
50
0,00
0$
500,
000
$
TBD
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
20/2
19,
650,
000
$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r12
,397
,000
$
-
$
500,
000
$
50
0,00
0$
-$
-
$
-$
Com
men
ts
Miss
ion
Stre
et E
xcel
sior S
afet
y
IPIC
- In
tera
genc
y Pl
an Im
plem
enta
tion
Com
mitt
ee (d
evel
opm
ent i
mpa
ct fe
es)
TSIP
- Tr
ansp
orta
tion
and
Stre
et In
fras
truc
ture
Pro
gram
TBD
sour
ces m
ay in
clud
e A
TP, H
SIP,
AH
SC, o
r new
loca
l rev
enue
sour
ces s
uch
as sa
les t
ax o
r gen
eral
oblig
atio
n bo
nd fu
nds.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
26
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2019/20Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2019/20Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2019/20 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2019/20
Monterey Boulevard between Miramar Avenue and I-280.
Project Information
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Monterey Street Safety Improvements
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
The project will plan, design and construct safety improvements to Monterey Boulevard, which is on the City's High Injury Network and serves as an important bicycle connection. The project will use an extensive community-based planning process to determine context-appropriate safety treatments for the corridor and may include both near-term and long-term recommendations. Improvements installed will respond to specific crash factors on Monterey Boulevard, specifically the portion of Monterey that is on the Vision Zero High Injury Network, and may include paint- and post-based improvements to improve safety for people on bikes and crossing Monterey, as well as curb extensions to reduce crossing distances. Specific improvements will be developed during the planning process.
Start Date End Date
Categorically Exempt
Comments/Concerns
Plan, design and construct safety improvements on Monterey Boulevard from Miramar Avenue to I-280. Monterey Boulevard is on the City's High Injury Network and serves as an important bicycle connection. Improvements will respond to specific crash factors on the corridor and may include paint- and post-based improvements to improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as curb extensions to reduce crossing distances. Specific improvements will be developed during the planning process.
District 07, District 08
TBD
Chava Kronenberg
27
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g17
5,00
0$
-
$
175,
000
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
75,0
00$
-
$
75,0
00$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
245,
000
$
245,
000
$
-$
Con
stru
ctio
n1,
550,
000
$
-$
1,
550,
000
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
2,04
5,00
0$
24
5,00
0$
1,
800,
000
$
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al12
%88
%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Lin
ePh
ase
Fund
Sou
rce
Stat
us
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
TSF
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
gPr
ogra
mm
edPr
evio
us17
5,00
0$
TSF
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
Prog
ram
med
Prev
ious
75,0
00$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ianC
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
Plan
ned
2019
/20
245,
000
$
10
,000
$
23
5,00
0$
TBD
Con
stru
ctio
nPl
anne
d20
21/2
21,
550,
000
$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r2,
045,
000
$
-
$
10,0
00$
235,
000
$
-
$
-$
-
$
Com
men
ts
Mon
tere
y St
reet
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ents
TSF
- Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Sust
ainab
ility
Fee
TBD
sour
ces m
ay in
clud
e A
TP, H
SIP
or n
ew lo
cal r
even
ue so
urce
s suc
h as
sale
s tax
or g
ener
al ob
ligat
ion
bond
fund
s.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
28
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.
Type of Environmental Clearance Required:
Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual EngineeringEnvironmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
TBD
TBD
TBD
Project is placeholder for capital improvements on the San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network. The SFMTA will develop individual project allocation requests, with prioritization, scope, outreach, schedule, budget, and a full funding plan prior to support allocation of Prop K funds.
Chava Kronenberg
415.701.4451
Every year about 30 people in San Francisco lose their lives to traffic crashes, and an additional 500 people are severely injured. 61% of these injuries and fatalities occur on 12.8% of San Francisco streets. San Francisco adopted Vision Zero as a policy in 2014 to eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce severe injuries by 2024. Through Vision Zero, San Francisco is committing to build better and safer streets, educate the public on traffic safety, better enforce traffic laws, and adopt policy changes that save lives. Capital investments in pedestrian safety at SFMTA are outlined through the agency’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Planned capital improvements in the CIP focused on pedestrian safety include both programmatic lines for quick and effective capital work and traffic calming programs, as well as corridor projects such as the 6th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements project and the Folsom-Howard Streetscape Improvements. This programmatic placeholder would likely be used to advance corridor projects.
Start Date End Date
TBD
Comments/Concerns
Programmatic funds for future projects that are key in the City’s focus on Vision Zero, the City’s goal to reduce all traffic deaths to zero by 2024.
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety
2022/23, 2023/24
TBD
Project Information
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Vision Zero Improvements Placeholder
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
29
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g-
$
-$
-
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-
$
-$
Righ
t of W
ay-
$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
-$
-
$
-$
Co
nstru
ctio
n2,
000,
000
$
2,00
0,00
0$
-
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
2,00
0,00
0$
2,
000,
000
$
-$
Pe
rcen
t of T
otal
100%
0%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Line
Phas
eFu
nd S
ourc
e St
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
420
24/2
5
Prop
K40
-Ped
estri
anCi
rcul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Cons
truct
ion
Plan
ned
2022
/23
1,00
0,00
0$
50
0,00
0$
50
0,00
0$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estri
anCi
rcul
atio
n/Sa
fety
Cons
truct
ion
Plan
ned
2023
/24
1,00
0,00
0$
50
0,00
0$
50
0,00
0$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r2,
000,
000
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
50
0,00
0$
1,
000,
000
$
50
0,00
0$
Com
men
ts
Visi
on Z
ero
Impr
ovem
ents
Pla
ceho
lder
App
ropr
iate
leve
ragi
ng e
xpec
ted
at ti
me
of a
lloca
tion.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i
.e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
30
San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form
Project Name:
Implementing Agency:
Category:
Subcategory:
EP Line (Primary):
Other EP Line Number/s:
Fiscal Year of Allocation:
Project Location:
Supervisorial District(s):
Project Manager:
Phone Number:
Email:
Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):
Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).
Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).
Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.Type of Environmental Clearance Required:Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.
No
Project Delivery Milestones Status Work
Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year
Planning/Conceptual EngineeringEnvironmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)
Prop K Project Information Form
Prop K Expenditure Plan Information
C. Street & Traffic Safety
38-Traffic Calming
TBD
Project Information
30, 39, 40, 43, 44
iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
NTIP Placeholder
The Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) funds community-based neighborhood-scale transportation projects, especially in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities). The NTIP program came out of the San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment that identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives. The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district ($100,000 for each district over the next 5 years); and a capital component ($600,000 for each district over the next 5 years) to provide local matching funds for about two neighborhood-scale projects in each district in the next five years. This is the second cycle of the NTIP program. This placeholder is for capital funds.
Start Date End Date
TBD
Comments/Concerns
The Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) funds community-based neighborhood-scale transportation projects, especially in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities). The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district; and a capital component to provide local matching funds for neighborhood-scale projects in each district. This placeholder is for capital funds.
TBD
TBD
NTIP program is specifically designed to be community-based, with priority given to projects in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities).
This is a placeholder. Schedule will be determined once a specific NTIP plan proposal is developed. Sufficient detail will be required when the allocation request is submitted.
31
San
Fran
cisc
o C
ount
y T
rans
port
atio
n A
utho
rity
Prop
ositi
on K
Sal
es T
ax P
rogr
am P
roje
ct I
nfor
mat
ion
Form
Proj
ect N
ame:
Proj
ect C
ost E
stim
ate
Phas
eC
ost
Prop
KO
ther
Plan
ning
/Con
cept
ual E
ngin
eerin
g-
$
-$
-
$
Env
ironm
enta
l Stu
dies
(PA
&E
D)
-$
-$
-
$
Rig
ht o
f Way
-$
-$
-
$
Des
ign
Eng
inee
ring
(PS&
E)
-$
-$
-
$
Con
stru
ctio
n6,
600,
000
$
6,60
0,00
0$
-
$
Ope
ratio
ns (i
.e. p
arat
rans
it)-
$
-$
-
$
Tot
al P
roje
ct C
ost
6,60
0,00
0$
6,60
0,00
0$
TBD
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al10
0%
Fund
Sou
rce
Prop
K E
xpen
ditu
re
Line
Phas
eFu
nd S
ourc
e St
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear o
f A
lloca
tion
(Pro
gram
min
g Y
ear)
Tot
al F
undi
ngPr
evio
us20
19/2
020
20/2
120
21/2
220
22/2
320
23/2
4
Prop
K30
-Oth
er U
pgra
des t
o M
ajor
Art
eria
lsA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
025
0,00
0$
125,
000
$
12
5,00
0$
Prop
K38
-Tra
ffic
Cal
min
gA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
02,
850,
000
$
1,42
5,00
0$
1,
425,
000
$
Prop
K39
-Bic
ycle
Circ
ulat
ion/
Safe
tyA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
01,
000,
000
$
500,
000
$
50
0,00
0$
Prop
K40
-Ped
estr
ian
Circ
ulat
ion/
Safe
tyA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
01,
100,
000
$
550,
000
$
55
0,00
0$
Prop
K43
-Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Dem
and
Mgm
tA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
050
0,00
0$
250,
000
$
25
0,00
0$
Prop
K44
-Tra
nspo
rtat
ion/
Land
Use
Coo
rdin
atio
nA
nyPl
anne
d20
19/2
090
0,00
0$
450,
000
$
45
0,00
0$
Tot
al B
y Fi
scal
Yea
r6,
600,
000
$
-
$
3,30
0,00
0$
3,
300,
000
$
-$
-
$
-$
Com
men
ts
NTI
P Pl
aceh
olde
r
The
NTI
P in
clud
es $
600,
000
for e
ach
supe
rviso
rial d
istric
t ove
r the
nex
t 5 y
ears
to im
plem
ent c
apita
l pro
ject
s. W
hen
NTI
P ca
pita
l pro
ject
s are
iden
tifie
d, th
ey a
re e
xpec
ted
to in
clud
e ap
prop
riate
leve
ragi
ng.
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Cas
h Fl
ow fo
r Pro
p K
Onl
y (i.
e. F
isca
l Yea
r of R
eim
burs
emen
t)Fu
ndin
g Pl
an -
All
Phas
es
32
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
SFM
TA6t
h St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
(NTI
P)PS
&E
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$7
00,0
00$7
00,0
00SF
MTA
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
CON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$3
,000
,000
$3,0
00,0
00SF
MTA
7th
Stre
et S
treet
scap
ePS
&E
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$1
74,0
00$1
74,0
00
SFM
TAFo
llow
-the-
Pavi
ng (S
pot I
mpr
ovem
ents
)PS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$5
0,00
0$5
0,00
0
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
PLA
N/C
ER
Prog
ram
med
$10,
000
$10,
000
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$80,
000
$80,
000
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
CON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$5
94,8
93$5
94,8
93SF
MTA
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
chPS
&E
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$3
00,0
00$3
00,0
00SF
MTA
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
chCO
N
Prog
ram
med
$300
,000
$300
,000
SFM
TAW
alkFi
rst
PLA
N/C
ER
Prog
ram
med
$125
,000
$125
,000
SFM
TAW
alkFi
rst
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$325
,000
$325
,000
SFM
TAW
alkFi
rst
CON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$6
00,0
00$6
00,0
00SF
MTA
Walk
Firs
tPL
AN
/CE
R Pr
ogra
mm
ed$5
3,99
6$5
3,99
6SF
MTA
Walk
Firs
tPS
&E
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$1
10,0
00$1
10,0
00SF
MTA
Walk
Firs
tCO
N
Prog
ram
med
$65,
000
$65,
000
SFM
TA, A
ny
elig
ible
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent
Prog
ram
(NTI
P) p
laceh
olde
rPS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$8
00,0
00$8
00,0
00
SFM
TA, A
ny
elig
ible
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent
Prog
ram
(NTI
P) p
laceh
olde
rPS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$8
00,0
00$8
00,0
00
$6,4
08,8
93
$850
,000
$2
28,9
96
$300
,000
$3
00,0
00
$8,0
87,8
89
$6,4
08,8
93
$850
,000
$2
28,9
96
$300
,000
$3
00,0
00
$8,0
87,8
89
$107
$1
07
$107
$1
07
$107
$1
07
Cum
ulat
ive
Rem
aini
ng P
rogr
amm
ing
Cap
acity
Tot
al P
rogr
amm
ed in
201
4 St
rate
gic
Plan
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty &
Circ
ulat
ion
Impr
ovem
ents
Tot
al P
rogr
amm
ed in
5Y
PP
Corr
idor
Pro
ject
s
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
Age
ncy
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eSt
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
l
Prog
ram
min
g A
ppro
ved
June
24,
201
4
Prop
K 5
-Yea
r Pro
ject
Lis
t (FY
201
4/15
- 20
18/1
9)Pe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion/
Safe
ty (E
P 40
)
33
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
PS&
E
$700
,000
$700
,000
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
CON
$3
0,00
0$1
,500
,000
$1,4
70,0
00$3
,000
,000
7th
Stre
et S
treet
scap
ePS
&E
$1
74,0
00$1
74,0
00
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
(Spo
t Im
prov
emen
ts)
PS&
E, C
ON
$50,
000
$50,
000
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
chPL
AN
/CE
R $1
0,00
0$1
0,00
0A
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
PS&
E
$30,
000
$50,
000
$80,
000
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
chCO
N
$41,
682
$276
,606
$276
,605
$594
,893
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
chPS
&E
$1
50,0
00$1
50,0
00$3
00,0
00A
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
CON
$1
50,0
00$1
50,0
00$3
00,0
00W
alkFi
rst
PLA
N/C
ER
$125
,000
$125
,000
Walk
Firs
tPS
&E
$1
62,5
00$1
62,5
00$3
25,0
00W
alkFi
rst
CON
$3
00,0
00$3
00,0
00$6
00,0
00W
alkFi
rst
PLA
N/C
ER
$53,
996
$53,
996
Walk
Firs
tPS
&E
$5
5,00
0$5
5,00
0$1
10,0
00W
alkFi
rst
CON
$3
2,50
0$3
2,50
0$6
5,00
0N
eigh
borh
ood
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pr
ogra
m (N
TIP)
plac
ehol
der
PS&
E, C
ON
$400
,000
$400
,000
$800
,000
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent
Prog
ram
(NTI
P) p
laceh
olde
rPS
&E
, CO
N$4
00,0
00$4
00,0
00$8
00,0
00
$1,7
99,1
82
$3,3
13,1
06
$2,2
88,1
01
$237
,500
$3
00,0
00
$150
,000
$8
,087
,889
$1
,799
,182
$3
,313
,106
$2
,288
,101
$2
37,5
00
$300
,000
$1
50,0
00
$8,0
87,8
89
$107
$1
07
$107
$1
07
$107
$1
07
$107
C
umul
ativ
e R
emai
ning
Cas
h Fl
ow C
apac
ityT
otal
Pro
gram
med
in 2
014
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty &
Circ
ulat
ion
Impr
ovem
ents
Tot
al C
ash
Flow
in 5
YPP
Corr
idor
Pro
ject
s
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
(Ped
estri
an Im
prov
emen
ts)
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
lPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
aseCas
h Fl
ow ($
) Max
imum
Ann
ual R
eim
burs
emen
t
Prop
K 5
-Yea
r Pro
ject
Lis
t (FY
201
4/15
- 20
18/1
9)Pe
dest
rian
Circ
ulat
ion/
Safe
ty (E
P 40
)
34
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
Cor
ridor
Pro
ject
sSF
MTA
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TA6t
h St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
(NTI
P)C
ON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0SF
MTA
6th
Stre
et P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ent
PA&
ED
A
lloca
ted
$2,0
12,0
00$2
,012
,000
SFM
TAW
iggl
e N
eigh
borh
ood
Gre
en C
orrid
or
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$5
72,1
00$5
72,1
00SF
MTA
7th
Stre
et S
treet
scap
ePS
&E
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0
SFM
TAFo
llow
-the-
Pavi
ng (S
pot I
mpr
ovem
ents
)PS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
PL
AN
/CE
R Pr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0SF
MTA
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
ch
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
C
ON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0SF
PWE
R Ta
ylor
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool S
afe
Rout
es to
Sch
ool
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$6
,575
$6,5
75SF
PWLo
ngfe
llow
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool S
afe
Rout
es to
Sch
ool
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$6
4,57
8$6
4,57
8SF
MTA
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
ch
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAA
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
C
ON
Pr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0SF
MTA
Jeff
erso
n St
reet
Impr
ovem
ents
Pha
se 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l] C
ON
A
lloca
ted
$1,4
13,7
40$1
,413
,740
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
PLA
N/C
ER
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
CO
N
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst C
ontin
enta
l Cro
ssw
alks
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$4
23,0
00$4
23,0
00SF
MTA
Wal
kFirs
t Rec
tang
ular
Rap
id F
lash
ing
Beac
ons
PLA
NA
lloca
ted
$17,
100
$17,
100
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst R
ecta
ngul
ar R
apid
Fla
shin
g Be
acon
sPS
&E
Allo
cate
d$4
7,40
0$4
7,40
0SF
MTA
Wal
kFirs
t Rec
tang
ular
Rap
id F
lash
ing
Beac
ons
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$1
58,4
00$1
58,4
00SF
MTA
Gol
den
Gat
e Ro
ad D
iet [
Visi
on Z
ero]
CO
N
Allo
cate
d$1
20,0
00$1
20,0
00
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst P
hase
1 P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impl
emen
tatio
n [V
ision
Z
ero]
PS
&E
Allo
cate
d$2
00,0
00$2
00,0
00
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst P
hase
1 P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impl
emen
tatio
n [V
ision
Z
ero]
C
ON
Allo
cate
d$8
00,0
00$8
00,0
00
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst P
hase
1 P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impl
emen
tatio
n [V
ision
Z
ero]
D
eobl
igat
edD
eobl
igat
ed($
144,
146)
($14
4,14
6)
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
PLA
N/C
ER
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
PS&
E
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TAW
alkF
irst
CO
N
Prog
ram
med
$0$0
SFM
TASa
fe S
treet
s Pro
ject
Eva
luat
ion
Prog
ram
PLA
NA
lloca
ted
$130
,150
$130
,150
SFM
TABe
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PL
AN
Allo
cate
d$7
,500
$7,5
00SF
MTA
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PLA
ND
eobl
igat
ed($
975)
($97
5)SF
MTA
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
EA
lloca
ted
$6,0
00$6
,000
SFM
TABe
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l] PS
&E
Deo
blig
ated
($2,
205)
($2,
205)
SFM
TABe
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]C
ON
Allo
cate
d$1
4,50
0$1
4,50
0
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty &
Circ
ulat
ion
Impr
ovem
ents
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
Age
ncy
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eSt
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
l
Prog
ram
min
g an
d A
lloca
tions
to D
ate
Pend
ing
Nov
embe
r 27,
201
8 Bo
ard
2014
Pro
p K
5-Y
ear P
roje
ct L
ist (
FY 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
(EP
40)
35
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
Age
ncy
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eSt
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
l
Prog
ram
min
g an
d A
lloca
tions
to D
ate
Pend
ing
Nov
embe
r 27,
201
8 Bo
ard
2014
Pro
p K
5-Y
ear P
roje
ct L
ist (
FY 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
(EP
40)
SFM
TABe
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]C
ON
Deo
blig
ated
($3,
428)
($3,
428)
SFM
TAC
esar
Cha
vez/
Bays
hore
/Pot
rero
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
[N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PLA
NA
lloca
ted
$50,
000
$50,
000
SFM
TAC
esar
Cha
vez/
Bays
hore
/Pot
rero
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
[N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PLA
ND
eobl
igat
ed($
5,31
4)($
5,31
4)
SFM
TA,
Any
elig
ible
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent P
rogr
am
(NTI
P) P
lace
hold
erPS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$0$0
SFPW
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n (T
he H
airb
all -
Seg
men
ts F
& G
) [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
EA
lloca
ted
$80,
000
$80,
000
SFM
TAE
lk S
treet
at S
usse
x St
reet
Ped
estri
an S
afet
y Im
prov
emen
ts
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
Allo
cate
d$8
0,00
0$8
0,00
0
SFM
TAA
rgue
llo B
oule
vard
Nea
r-te
rm Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
EA
lloca
ted
$10,
520
$10,
520
SFM
TAA
rgue
llo B
oule
vard
Nea
r-te
rm Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
ED
eobl
igat
ed($
10,5
20)
($10
,520
)
SFM
TALo
wer
Gre
at H
ighw
ay P
edes
trian
Impr
ovem
ents
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
Allo
cate
d$7
0,50
0$7
0,50
0
SFM
TALo
wer
Gre
at H
ighw
ay P
edes
trian
Impr
ovem
ents
[NTI
P C
apita
l]C
ON
Allo
cate
d$1
79,5
00$1
79,5
00
SFPW
Ale
man
y In
terc
hang
e Im
prov
emen
ts -
Phas
e 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PA
&E
DA
lloca
ted
$20,
000
$20,
000
SFPW
Ale
man
y In
terc
hang
e Im
prov
emen
ts -
Phas
e 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
Allo
cate
d$3
80,0
00$3
80,0
00
SFPW
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n Im
prov
emen
ts (T
he H
airb
all -
Seg
men
ts F
& G
) [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
CO
NA
lloca
ted
$220
,000
$220
,000
SFM
TA,
Any
elig
ible
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent P
rogr
am
(NTI
P) P
lace
hold
erPS
&E
, CO
NPr
ogra
mm
ed$0
$558
,088
$558
,088
$1,8
87,0
53
$2,0
40,0
00
$582
,640
$9
93,5
41
$1,9
71,8
28
$7,4
75,0
62
$6,4
08,8
93
$850
,000
$2
28,9
96
$300
,000
$3
00,0
00
$8,0
87,8
89
$4,8
13,6
22
$3,6
23,6
22
$3,2
69,9
78
$2,5
76,4
36
$904
,608
$9
04,6
08
Boar
d A
ppro
ved
Allo
catio
n/A
ppro
pria
tion
Prog
ram
med
Pend
ing
Allo
catio
n/A
ppro
pria
tion
Tot
al P
rogr
amm
ed in
201
4 St
rate
gic
Plan
Cum
ulat
ive
Rem
aini
ng P
rogr
amm
ing
Cap
acity
Tot
al P
rogr
amm
ed in
5Y
PP
36
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
Age
ncy
Proj
ect N
ame
Phas
eSt
atus
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
l
Prog
ram
min
g an
d A
lloca
tions
to D
ate
Pend
ing
Nov
embe
r 27,
201
8 Bo
ard
2014
Pro
p K
5-Y
ear P
roje
ct L
ist (
FY 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
(EP
40)
FOO
TN
OT
ES:
Com
preh
ensiv
e 20
14 5
YPP
Am
endm
ent c
oncu
rren
t with
201
9 5Y
PP a
dopt
ion
(Res
o X
X, a
ppro
ved
YY
Y).
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
: Red
uced
from
$40
0,00
0 to
$0.
Pro
ject
will
adv
ance
in th
e 20
19 5
YPP
for t
he T
raff
ic C
alm
ing
cate
gory
.7t
h St
reet
Stre
etsc
ape:
Red
uced
from
$17
4,00
0 to
$0.
Pro
ject
was
fund
ed th
roug
h no
n-Pr
op K
fund
s. Fo
llow
-the-
Pavi
ng (S
pot I
mpr
ovem
ents
): Re
duce
d $5
0,00
0 to
$0.
Pro
ject
was
fund
ed th
roug
h no
n-Pr
op K
fund
s. W
alkF
irst:
Redu
ced
$228
,996
to $
0. P
roje
ct w
as fu
nded
thro
ugh
non-
Prop
K fu
nds.
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent P
rogr
am (N
TIP)
Pla
ceho
lder
: Mov
ed $
558,
088
from
FY
14/
15 a
nd F
Y 1
5/16
to F
Y 1
8/19
, with
cor
resp
ondi
ng c
ash
flow
adj
ustm
ent.
SFM
TA li
kely
to re
ques
t $32
5,00
0 in
FY
18/
19 fo
r con
stru
ctio
n ph
ase
of th
e E
lk S
treet
at S
usse
x St
reet
Ped
estri
an S
afet
y Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital],
fulfi
lling
the
com
mitm
ent t
o al
loca
te a
ppro
ved
by th
e Bo
ard
in N
ovem
ber 2
016.
37
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
2020
/21
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
PS&
E
$0$0
6th
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts (N
TIP)
CO
N
$0$0
$0$0
6th
Stre
et P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ent
PA&
ED
$0$3
65,8
18$7
31,6
36$7
31,6
36$1
82,9
10$2
,012
,000
Wig
gle
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d G
reen
Cor
ridor
C
ON
$3
23,5
00$2
48,6
00$5
72,1
007t
h St
reet
Stre
etsc
ape
PS&
E
$0$0
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
(Spo
t Im
prov
emen
ts)
PS&
E, C
ON
$0$0
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
ch
PLA
N/C
ER
$0$0
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
ch
PS&
E
$0$0
$0A
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
C
ON
$0
$0$0
$0E
R Ta
ylor
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool S
afe
Rout
es to
Sch
ool
CO
N
$6,5
75$6
,575
Long
fello
w E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l Saf
e Ro
utes
to S
choo
l C
ON
$1
2,66
3$5
1,91
5$6
4,57
8A
ctiv
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Prog
ram
Loc
al M
atch
PS
&E
$0
$0$0
Act
ive
Tran
spor
tatio
n Pr
ogra
m L
ocal
Mat
ch
CO
N
$0$0
$0Je
ffer
son
Stre
et Im
prov
emen
ts P
hase
2 [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
CO
N
$329
,496
$1,0
70,1
67$1
4,07
7$1
,413
,740
Wal
kFirs
t PL
AN
/CE
R $0
$0W
alkF
irst
PS&
E
$0$0
$0W
alkF
irst
CO
N
$0$0
$0W
alkF
irst C
ontin
enta
l Cro
ssw
alks
CO
N
$211
,500
$211
,500
$423
,000
Wal
kFirs
t Rec
tang
ular
Rap
id F
lash
ing
Beac
ons
PLA
N$1
7,10
0$1
7,10
0W
alkF
irst R
ecta
ngul
ar R
apid
Fla
shin
g Be
acon
sPS
&E
$47,
400
$47,
400
Wal
kFirs
t Rec
tang
ular
Rap
id F
lash
ing
Beac
ons
CO
N
$79,
200
$79,
200
$158
,400
Gol
den
Gat
e Ro
ad D
iet [
Visi
on Z
ero]
CO
N
$40,
000
$80,
000
$120
,000
Wal
kFirs
t Pha
se 1
Ped
estri
an S
afet
y Im
plem
enta
tion
[Visi
on
Zer
o]
PS&
E$1
00,0
00$1
00,0
00$2
00,0
00
Wal
kFirs
t Pha
se 1
Ped
estri
an S
afet
y Im
plem
enta
tion
[Visi
on
Zer
o]
CO
N$6
00,0
00$2
00,0
00$8
00,0
00
Wal
kFirs
t Pha
se 1
Ped
estri
an S
afet
y Im
plem
enta
tion
[Visi
on
Zer
o]
Deo
blig
ated
($14
4,14
6)($
144,
146)
Wal
kFirs
tPL
AN
/CE
R $0
$0W
alkF
irst
PS&
E
$0$0
$0W
alkF
irst
CO
N
$0$0
$0Sa
fe S
treet
s Pro
ject
Eva
luat
ion
Prog
ram
PLA
N$1
30,1
50$1
30,1
50Be
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PL
AN
$7,5
00$7
,500
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PLA
N($
975)
($97
5)Be
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
$6,0
00$6
,000
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
E($
2,20
5)($
2,20
5)Be
ssie
Car
mic
hael
Cro
ssw
alk
[NTI
P C
apita
l]C
ON
$3,0
00$1
1,50
0$1
4,50
0
City
wid
e Pe
dest
rian
Safe
ty &
Circ
ulat
ion
Impr
ovem
ents
Cor
ridor
Pro
ject
s
Follo
w-th
e-Pa
ving
(Ped
estri
an Im
prov
emen
ts)
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
lPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Cas
h Fl
ow ($
) Max
imum
Ann
ual R
eim
burs
emen
tPe
ndin
g N
ovem
ber 2
7, 2
018
Boar
d
2014
Pro
p K
5-Y
ear P
roje
ct L
ist (
FY 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
(EP
40)
38
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
2020
/21
Fisc
al Y
ear
Tota
lPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Cas
h Fl
ow ($
) Max
imum
Ann
ual R
eim
burs
emen
tPe
ndin
g N
ovem
ber 2
7, 2
018
Boar
d
2014
Pro
p K
5-Y
ear P
roje
ct L
ist (
FY 2
014/
15 -
2018
/19)
Pede
stria
n C
ircul
atio
n/Sa
fety
(EP
40)
Bess
ie C
arm
icha
el C
ross
wal
k [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
CO
N($
3,42
8)($
3,42
8)C
esar
Cha
vez/
Bays
hore
/Pot
rero
Inte
rsec
tion
Impr
ovem
ents
[N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PLA
N$1
2,50
0$3
7,50
0$5
0,00
0
Ces
ar C
have
z/Ba
ysho
re/P
otre
ro In
ters
ectio
n Im
prov
emen
ts
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PL
AN
($5,
314)
($5,
314)
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent P
rogr
am
(NTI
P) P
lace
hold
erPS
&E
, CO
N$0
$0$0
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n (T
he H
airb
all -
Seg
men
ts F
& G
) [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
E$4
0,00
0$4
0,00
0$8
0,00
0
Elk
Stre
et a
t Sus
sex
Stre
et P
edes
trian
Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ents
[N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
E$8
0,00
0$8
0,00
0
Arg
uello
Bou
leva
rd N
ear-
term
Impr
ovem
ents
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
$10,
520
$10,
520
Arg
uello
Bou
leva
rd N
ear-
term
Impr
ovem
ents
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
($10
,520
)($
10,5
20)
Low
er G
reat
Hig
hway
Ped
estri
an Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
PS&
E$4
0,50
0$3
0,00
0$7
0,50
0
Low
er G
reat
Hig
hway
Ped
estri
an Im
prov
emen
ts [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
CO
N$9
0,00
0$8
9,50
0$1
79,5
00
Ale
man
y In
terc
hang
e Im
prov
emen
ts -
Phas
e 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PA
&E
D$1
0,00
0$1
0,00
0$2
0,00
0
Ale
man
y In
terc
hang
e Im
prov
emen
ts -
Phas
e 2
[NTI
P C
apita
l]PS
&E
$150
,000
$230
,000
$380
,000
Bays
hore
Blv
d/C
esar
Cha
vez
St/P
otre
ro A
ve In
ters
ectio
n Im
prov
emen
ts (T
he H
airb
all -
Seg
men
ts F
& G
) [N
TIP
Cap
ital]
CO
N$2
20,0
00$2
20,0
00
Nei
ghbo
rhoo
d Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impr
ovem
ent P
rogr
am
(NTI
P) P
lace
hold
erPS
&E
, CO
N$0
$0$1
11,6
18$4
46,4
70$5
58,0
88
$447
,738
$1
,525
,933
$1
,314
,767
$1
,452
,386
$1
,203
,524
$1
,516
,637
$1
4,07
7 $7
,475
,062
$1
,811
,845
$3
,300
,443
$2
,288
,101
$2
37,5
00
$300
,000
$1
50,0
00
$8,0
87,8
89
$1,6
55,8
89
$3,4
30,3
99
$4,4
03,7
32
$3,1
88,8
46
$2,2
85,3
23
$918
,685
$9
04,6
08
$904
,608
Boar
d A
ppro
ved
Allo
catio
n/A
ppro
pria
tion
Prog
ram
med
Pend
ing
Allo
catio
n/A
ppro
pria
tion
Tot
al P
rogr
amm
ed in
201
4 St
rate
gic
Plan
Cum
ulat
ive
Rem
aini
ng C
ash
Flow
Cap
acity
Tot
al C
ash
Flow
in 5
YPP
39