research contracting csiro experiences and … contracting csiro experiences and australian...
TRANSCRIPT
Research Contracting CSIRO Experiences and Australian Reflections
Brett Walker General Counsel CSIRO
Presentation Overview
• Part 1 – Overview of CSIRO and its approach to research contracting
• Part 2 - The bigger picture – research contracting approaches and challenges
• Part 3 – Key legal and negotiating issues in collaborative research arrangements
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Part 1 – Overview of CSIRO and its approach to research contracting
• CSIRO is Australia’s national research agency with a staff of nearly 6,500
• Established under the Science and Industry Research Act 1949
• Operating across a broad range of science disciplines (from mining to computer science to agriculture) and across all States and Territories from just 55 sites
• Involved in a very large number of domestic and international research collaborations
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Some Context
• A Legal Team of 45 (37 lawyers) located across Australia
• A Contract Administration and Records Management Team of 60 – 22 Contract Managers; 9 Contract Support Officers
• 6,300 new research contracts per annum; 50% through FastTrack; average value $55,000
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contract Types (Higher Value / Higher Risk)
• Procurement Contracts (often specialised scientific equipment)
• Joint Venture Agreements and Agreements establishing spin-off companies
• Collaborative Research Agreements • Technology Licences (licensee and licensor)
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contract Types (Lower Value / Lower Risk)
• Confidentiality Agreements
• Material Transfer / Evaluation Agreements
• Field Trial Agreements
• Consultancy / Contract Research Agreements
• Testing and Services Agreements
• Procurement contracts (more routine items)
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contract Research Lifecycle
Responsibility of
Researchers
Responsibility of Researchers
Shared responsibility of Researchers, Contract Admin, Legal, BD Managers & Commercialisation team
SAP Projects
Pipeline and EOP system
EOP; FastTrack; SAP SD; TRIM Records systems via Contracts Admin
• Pipeline 2020 – Large early stage ideas • EOP – Enterprise Opportunities Pipeline – contract negotiations • FastTrack – Contract generation & approvals • SAP – Project Management, Finance, Invoicing, HR, etc • TRIM – Records management
Project Origination
& Approval Client leads & prospects
Proposal Development
Contract negotiation
& approval
Delivery to client &
variations
Close
Systems are integrated
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
What is FastTrack?
FastTrack is CSIRO’s in-house automated contract generation, risk assessment and approval system; FastTrack incorporates the following legal and business principles:
• Risk management, rather than risk avoidance • Increased empowerment of scientists to develop lower risk, lower value
agreements • Reflects CSIRO commercial policy - separation of negotiation and
approval powers • Minimal negotiation of Terms & Conditions
FastTrack is integrated with other CSIRO systems, to limit the amount of re-work required
• FastTrack imports customer and contact data from SAP • FastTrack exports completed contract data to SAP • Contract records are stored electronically in CSIRO’s records
management system; original hard copy retained in secure storage Content is managed by the FastTrack Working Group
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contract Administration FastTrack system
Features include:- • Easy to use • Drop down lists • Real time • Integrated with SAP
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Objectives of FastTrack
Outcome
Streamlined and consistent processes
Simplified agreement generation and approval
Improved and consistent “look and feel”
Standard and simple legal terms (no re-statement of common law principles)
• Better client experience doing business with CSIRO
• More efficient and effective use of CSIRO’s staff time
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Risk management not risk avoidance • All agreements involve some element of risk, however the types of
agreements selected for the FastTrack system are those that are generally lower in risk. FastTrack aims to find the appropriate balance between risk and benefit.
• Researchers complete a basic risk assessment in FastTrack so potential risks are identified up front. Completing this risk assessment encourages staff to identify and build appropriate contingencies into agreements to cater to higher risk scenarios (e.g. payment up front if they feel there is a risk associated with non-payment).
• The two courses of action are available for higher risk agreements are: • The appropriate delegate agrees to the level of risk; OR • A customised agreement is prepared to address the risks and different
delegations apply.
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Standardised terms
• The legal terms of FastTrack agreements have been specifically drafted to avoid the need for legal negotiation, typically a lengthy and expensive process for both parties.
• The standard terms are expressed clearly in plain English to avoid misinterpretation and are written to be fair to both CSIRO and to our clients. We avoid re-statement of common law.
• Standardising both the appearance and legal terms across the organisation allows for consistency and familiarity, thereby simplifying the process, improving our clients’ experience in doing business with CSIRO, and ensuring a more effective and efficient use of our own resources.
• We take a non-negotiation stance with clients on these agreement types, which means the terms are final and the contract is sent to the client as a PDF or hard copy format to discourage potential changes.
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
• Deliverables (replaces outputs/results)
• Delivery Date (replaces anticipated date/target date/ expected date)
• Materials (replaces data/samples/artefacts/contributions)
• Application (replaces field of agreement/ permitted uses)
• Payment Terms • Additional Expenses
FastTrack relies on the use of standardised words to act as “definitions" – these appear on the cover page and are referred to in the terms. Examples include:
Standardised definitions
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Agreements available in FastTrack
Services by CSIRO • e.g. Consulting Services, Contract Research Services,
Testing Services (One-off and Period), Beta Testing, Hire of Equipment/ Facilities, Technology Evaluation, Training Services, Feasibility Study, Software Licence.
Non-financial agreements
• e.g. Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure, Material Transfer.
Services to CSIRO
• e.g. Hire of Research Contractor, Student & Visitor agreements.
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Customising the standard Terms 1. Project detail questions allow customisation of the cover
page of the contract, specifically the: • services • deliverables • timing & payment arrangements
2. Yes/no questions in the legal terms customisation screen allows the tailoring of: • IP options for consulting services and research
agreements • other clauses such as materials, services
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
An example of how clauses are customised
i. CSIRO assigns the Project IP to you xxx yyy xxx yyy xxx yyy xxx yyy; and
ii. CSIRO grants you a non-exclusive licence xxx yyy xxx yyy xxx yyy xxx yyy.
Will any of the Deliverables contain, or be likely to contain, any Background IP (i.e. pre-existing IP belonging to CSIRO)?
YES Will CSIRO be assigning the Project IP (i.e. new IP created by CSIRO while it is carrying out the Project) to the Client?
Does CSIRO wish to use the Project IP after it has assigned it to the Client?
Drop in clauses i.
and ii.
YES NO
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Part 2 - Research Contracting in Context
• A stable framework for collaboration which allows all parties to meet their objectives
• Agreed allocation of responsibilities (eg milestones, deliverables)
• Financial certainty (payments, payment terms)
• Agreed allocation of risks and benefits
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
General Contracting Challenges in the Research Sector
• Law v science – different approaches to risk
• The desire for contractual certainty v the reality of uncertain outcomes
• Equitable risk and benefit allocation
• Dealing with intangibles and the inherent divisibility of IP rights
• Negotiating multiparty contracts and subcontracts
• Contracts for research inputs can encumber research outputs
• The Golden Rule – “he who holds the funds makes the rules”!
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contracting Process Design – 5 Key Elements
1. Efficient and effective 2. Ensure risks are identified, assessed and managed (as far as they
can be in the contract)
3. Enables the research organisation to achieve its objectives and comply with its charter and the law
4. Reflect a principled approach to rights, risk and benefit allocation
5. Assist with the establishment and maintenance of external relationships
The trick is how to reconcile these sometimes conflicting objectives
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Efficiency / Effectiveness
• Standard agreements and processes
• Identify the lower risk / lower value contracts that can be standardised and processed in a streamlined manner
• Minimise lawyer involvement in lower value / lower risk contracts
• Non negotiable positions
• IT based contract generation and risk assessment tools
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Risk Management
• Organisational risk framework / decision filters
• Who is responsible for identifying, assessing and managing risks?
• Contractual risk allocation
• Post-contract risk management
• Technical risk, financial risk, reputational risk, political risk, IP risk
• Risk assessment education
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Achieving your Objectives
• Articulating project objectives and outputs (impact pathways)
• Freedom to operate / freedom to conduct further research
• Platform technologies not encumbered
• Intellectual property rights allocation
• Publications and communications
• Charter / Mandate compliance
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
A Principled Approach
• IP ownership and rights allocation (needs v wants)
• Risk allocation – the “management and control” principle (risk management v risk avoidance)
• Mutuality – would I accept the positions I am putting to my collaborator?
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Manage External Relationships
• For larger contracts – don’t draft contracts too early
• Key principles to be agreed before lawyers are formally instructed
• An early and open discussion about “hot button” issues for each contracting party
• Shared ownership of the contracting phase
• Education – internal and external
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Common Problems • One-sided standard contracts
• Wrong “standard” contract for the job
• The “procurement mentality”
• Negotiation strategies not underpinned by a principled approach (wants dominating needs)
• Imbalance between risk and benefit allocation
• Overcomplicating things
• Lack of understanding of IP (notably the key features of specific IP regimes, IP component rights and IP divisibility)
• No clear articulation of project inputs, outputs and preferred impact pathways
• No internal ownership of the contracting phase
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Suggestions for Improvement
• Published organisational IP Principles as a frame of reference
• Fair standard terms
• Principled negotiations between research organisations and research funders on standard terms and more generally
• Principled negotiations between research organisations to develop standard agreements (eg material transfer agreements, research licences and collaborative research agreements)
• Education / shared understanding
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Part 3 – Key Legal and negotiating Issues in Research Contracting What is a contract?
• Legal definition • A legally binding agreement • Promise(s) for breach of which the law gives a remedy
• Research manager definition • A document setting out:
• Who does what and when • What happens if it isn’t done on time or at all • If things go well - how the benefits are shared • If things don’t go well - how the risks are shared
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Principled negotiation
• Principles, not positions • There is always a range of negotiability on any issue • No inflexible positions, just underlying interests that need to
be met • Get all interests on the table and generate options • Interests are rarely mutually exclusive – can have ‘win-win’s • Haggling is inefficient, simplistic and rarely leads to good
options • ‘Contracts at dawn’ is not usually a great starting point
• Contract negotiation is not just for lawyers and contract managers
• Research and business managers play a crucial role • Discussing principles first can save a lot of time and angst
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Principled negotiation
• Collaborators may not be aware of your interests • Laws and regulations • Contractual/IP restrictions • Reputation • Political implications • Insurance • Internal policies • Commercial/strategic objectives
• Explain interests and consequences – assess options • Encourage partners to discuss their interests rather than
positions
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Principled negotiation • Doesn’t mean you can’t have ‘standard’ agreements
• Eg: CSIRO’s FastTrack system • Low value, low risk, low complexity agreements • Short, simple, positive, plain-English drafting • Emphasis on project / relationship management vs onerous terms
• What are the real risks? • Avoid the unnecessary (eg re-statement of law)
• Balanced approach - would we sign it if the parties were reversed? • Desired outcome: partners more likely to accept and support
• Consistent with principled negotiation • ‘Pre-focused’ on key interests of both parties • Legitimate to have a ‘walk away’ point based on principle
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Anatomy of a collaboration
Agreement Parties
Carry out Project according to Project Plan
Contributions + Background IP
Premises
Management Committee + Leaders + Reporting
Project IP ownership
IP protection and enforcement regime
Commercial and research use
Royalties payment + accountability + transparency
Confidentiality + publication + use of name
Warranties, indemnities + liability limitations
Dispute resolution
Termination
Governing law
Project
You Partner Information
Inputs Inputs Project
Management
Partner’s premises
Your premises
Results Protection
Use Enforcement
Publication
Risk
Risk
Disputes
Termination
Royalties
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Focus - some key legal issues
• Project IP • Intellectual property in the results of the collaboration
• Background IP • Intellectual property contributed to the collaboration
• Risk management • Planning ahead for life’s little hurdles
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
What is Intellectual property?
• A bundle of legal rights over intellectual creations • Patents Act • Copyright Act • Trade Marks Act • Circuit Layout Act • Designs Act • Plant Breeders Rights Act • Judge-made law (common law / equity) • Contract
• Different rights apply to different subject matter • Eg: inventions, literary works, plant varieties, know-how • Some parallels – eg rights of co-owners • Variation between jurisdictions / countries
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Project IP
• No inherent meaning - a matter of definition in the contract
• Ownership is not everything
• Better viewed as a bundle of component rights • Way of avoiding IP ownership stalemates • Focuses parties on their respective interests, not positions • Parties can hopefully tailor a solution to meet both their
interests
• A matter of balance • Providing enough rights to enable successful use of results • Retaining enough rights to:
• Manage partner’s performance • Ensure appropriate freedom to operate
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Project IP
• Eg: IP component rights in patents • Right to file • Prosecution rights • Rights to manage defensive proceedings • Right to select and appoint patent attorneys • Maintenance obligations / rights concerning
proposed abandonments • Patent costs • Exploitation and commercialisation rights • Enforcement and settlement rights • Benefit sharing
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Project IP
• Eg: IP component rights in copyright material • Reproduction • Publication • Communication • Adaptation • Commercial renting (software) • Moral rights
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Project IP • Some component rights affect others
• May need to be bundled to a certain extent • Ownership is just one type of bundle • Licensing is another, more flexible bundling tool
• Exploitation and commercialisation rights • Often all a partner really wants when they initially seek
ownership • A licence may be sufficient - carefully define fields
• Benefit sharing • Again – will often satisfy a partner initially seeking
ownership • Better to address separately from ownership
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Project IP
• Co-ownership • Can be a means to secure compliance with contractual
obligations • Often seen as a ‘compromise’ between two ownership
positions • Be aware of what this actually means for component rights
• Exercise of rights requires consent • Loss of flexibility and potential for stalemate between co-
owners • Complex decision-making processes • Further agreements (eg commercialisation) • Cross-licensing • Not attractive to commercial partners / VCs
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Background IP
• No inherent meaning - a matter of definition in the contract
• Relevant to multiple issues • What is contributed to the project • What is not Project IP • What might be necessary to use Project IP • Can include IP owned by a third party
• Clear definition/scope is very important • Ideally set out in a detailed schedule • Bear in mind multiple purposes that the definition might be
used for • Consider separate definitions for separate issues • Avoid broad definitions
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Background IP • Freedom to operate - project
• What is required for the project? • What are you free to contribute to the project? • Are there restrictions on what can be done with it? • Document any restrictions in the agreement
• Freedom to operate – outside project • Is this background IP necessary for other work outside the
project? • Is it a platform technology? • Background IP licence would ordinarily be non-exclusive • Do you need to be able to grant exclusive rights to other
parties? • Keep licence scope to the minimum necessary to enable the
project
• A matter of balance – this project against other projects
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Background IP
• Commercialisation • Commercial licence may be necessary to enable
exploitation of Project IP • Should be considered separately from the project, as
part of commercialisation deal – possibly separate agreement
• Scope may be quite different from the Background IP that was necessary to perform the project
• Beware of broad licences in the project agreement
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Background IP
• Exclusion from Project IP – ‘improvements’ • Improvements are a tricky issue – covers future IP • What constitutes an improvement needs careful
attention • Will be different for different technologies and
different types of IP • Multiple definitions may be useful • Should be considered as part of holistic approach to
project results • Looking at component rights is more constructive
than ‘tug of war’
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Risk management
• Sources of legal risk
• Contractual risk management
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Sources of legal risk
• Breach of contractual obligations • ‘At fault’: Eg - failure to pay licence fee • ‘No fault’: Eg - technical failure due to staff resignation
• Breach of common law obligations • Eg – Negligence - poorly conducted experimental work • Eg – Breach of common law IP rights / confidentiality
• Breach of statutory obligations • Eg - Trade Practices Act - misleading statement to
investor • Eg – Statutory IP regimes – patent infringement
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Managing (not avoiding) legal risks
• Written contract • Before work starts
• Clear drafting • Avoid misunderstandings
• Risk allocation in the contract • “Management and control” test • Fault and no-fault events
• Common law risk allocation • Sometimes less contract is more
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Contractual risk management
• Warranties and Indemnities – why so controversial? • Can significantly increase your legal exposure under a
contract • Can take you outside your insurance cover • A “hot button issue” for Governments, Audit Offices,
Auditors as they can represent a significant contingent liability
• The key principles are not well understood in the business / research community – misconceptions and poorly drafted and thought out warranties and indemnities are everywhere!
• Therefore worth particular attention in this session
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Warranties
• What is a warranty? • Legally binding promise – part of every contract • Statement that something is or will be true • No magic in the word – a matter of substance
• “warrants”, “represents”, “agrees” – can all be construed as a promise
• Can be express or implied (eg by trade practices legislation)
• Overlap with indemnities
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Warranties
• Basic rule: don’t make promises you can’t keep • If compliance with a warranty is outside your control, it’s a
risk • Classic problem is future states of affairs you can’t control
• Eg: guaranteed research results • Eg: non-infringement of IP rights
• Your capacity to comply with contractual obligations is a key element of the risk assessment process and must be specifically addressed as part of your internal contract approval processes
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Warranties
• Examples for discussion • “You have the expertise and capacity to undertake the
Project” • “In undertaking the Project, you will not infringe 3rd party IP” • “My use of Deliverables will not infringe 3rd party IP” • “You have the right to make Background IP / Third Party IP
available for the Project” • “The Project is properly authorised in accordance with your
approval processes” • “The Deliverables will be fit for the purpose for which they
are provided” • “The Product will be at least 25% more effective than
product A”
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Warranties
• Assessing warranties • Step 1 – What are you agreeing to do under the contract? • Step 2 – Are you being asked to give any warranties
which rely on circumstances beyond your control (eg IP infringement / guaranteed results)? • If yes, seek qualification of warranties (eg no
infringement claims to our actual knowledge at the date of the contract) or amendment of contract (eg: undertake a series of research steps rather than guarantee a result).
• Step 3 – Of the warranties you can control – confirm they are true. • If not, either seek to amend the warranty or seek other
changes in contract (eg extension of milestone date)
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• What is an indemnity? • A contractual mechanism for apportioning liability between
the contracting parties and also managing liability to third parties
• An obligation of one party to make good the loss or damage the other party has incurred or suffered as a result of certain events
• A promise by a party to act as another party’s insurer for particular losses
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• An indemnity usually covers 2 types of liability: • Loss suffered by a party to the contract directly (eg loss of
profits) • Any liability a party to the contract incurs to a third party
for loss suffered by the third party.
• There are no such thing as “standard” indemnities! • Contracting parties are free to allocate risk between
themselves in any way they choose – it often comes down to bargaining power
• The Bank Guarantee scenario
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• It is useful to characterise indemnities as either: • An indemnity which covers losses that a person would be
liable for under the common law anyway. For example, negligence, breach of contract and unlawful acts (Category A); or
• An indemnity which covers losses that a person would otherwise not be liable for, that is, an indemnity which extends a person’s liability. In this way an indemnity can act to shift liability between the parties. (Category B)
• Indemnities you provide should normally fall into Category A. • Insurance policies usually exclude Category B losses • Acceptance of a Category B indemnity is therefore usually
acceptance of an uninsurable risk
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• When should we provide indemnities? • You should generally only give Category A indemnities • It is generally only appropriate for you to give an indemnity
where you are responsible for something over which the other contracting party has no control and, therefore, should not be liable • Eg: you will run a clinical trial and the other party only provides
funds
• When should we seek indemnities? • Similarly, it may be useful to seek an indemnity for losses or
liability that you cannot control. • Eg: the other party has complete control over commercialisation of
project technology
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• Don’t forget the common law • Centuries of sophisticated judge-made rules for liability
allocation • Needs to be a compelling reason to fiddle with this • CSIRO’s preferred approach is not to provide indemnities
and to rely instead on the common law position.
• There are also other contractual risk management tools • Eg: Exclusion clauses • Eg: Liability caps • Eg: Liquidated damages • Eg: Disclaimers
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• Example 1 • You agree to indemnify me from and against any and all
liability, losses, damages, and expenses howsoever incurred by me arising from any act or omission (whether there was fault or otherwise) of you or your officers, employees, agents, collaborators or subcontractors in connection with this agreement.
• Problems (bold wording): • Covers any and all loss no matter how incurred by the other
party • The loss is not necessarily caused by your fault, and may
even be caused by the other party’s negligence!
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• Example 2 • You indemnify me against all claims which may be brought or made
against me by any person in respect of any infringement or alleged infringement of Intellectual Property Rights by you or your employees, agents or subcontractors in connection with the performance of the Services or in relation to my use of the Contract Material.
• Problems (bold wording): • Covers allegations of infringement that may not be legally valid • Covers patent infringement. You cannot guarantee that your actions
will not infringe 3rd party patent rights due to the lag time in the patents system
• Covers IP infringement arising from the other party’s use of Contract Material. Such use is out of your control.
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities • Example 3
• You agree to indemnify me in respect of any liability (whether direct or indirect including any loss, action, suit, claim, demand, damage, injury, cost, charge, penalty, expense or diminution in value, legal costs, loss of profit or consequential damage) that I may suffer or incur arising out of or in connection with your activities in carrying out the Contract including: • (a) the use or commercialisation of the Project IP by any person; • (b) any infringement of IP of any person; and • (c) the use of the deliverables otherwise.
• Problems (bold wording): • Covers extended loss for which you may not otherwise be legally
liable • Covers loss arising from activities beyond your control • Not limited to the causes listed in (a) – (c) – could cover broad class
of other losses
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Indemnities
• Useful responses to requests for inappropriate indemnities • Your organisation should only be liable for losses for which you
would be liable at law • Risk / liability should lie with the party who is best placed to
control and minimise it
• Remember – there is no standard indemnity! • The type and scope of contractual risk management (if
any) that is appropriate will depend on the context of each transaction
NZ Contracting & IP Workshop
Thank you
Brett Walker General Counsel CSIRO Tel: 612 6276 6275 Email: [email protected]