evaluation of two phase natural circulation flow in the ... using the relap5/mod3 contents – to...
TRANSCRIPT
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Evaluation of Two Phase Natural Circulation Flow
in the Reactor Cavity under IVR-ERVC
for Different Thermal Power Reactors
Rae-Joon Park, Kwang-Soon Ha, Hwan-Yeol Kim
Severe Accident & PHWR Safety Research Division
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
CONTENTS
Introduction
– IVR-ERVC Concept
– Research Needs & Backgrounds
– Objectives
RELAP5 Input Model
RELAP5 Results & Discussion
Conclusions
2
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Introduction (1)
In-Vessel corium Retention through External Reactor Vessel
Cooling
– Design Feature for SA Mitigation
AP600 & AP1000 in USA
Loviisa in Finland
KERENA in Germany, and so on
– As a part of SAMG Strategies
APR1400 & OPR1000 in Korea
Current Operating Plants, and so on
3
Schematic Diagram of IVR-ERVC
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Introduction (2)
IVR-ERVC
– The strategy of the APR1400 for severe accident mitigation aims at retaining molten core in-vessel first and ex-vessel cooling of corium second in case the reactor vessel fails, reinforcing the principle of defense-in-depth.
– IVR-ERVC was adopted as one of severe accident management strategies. In IVR-ERVC condition, the cavity will be flooded from IRWST by the SCP and the BAMP to the hot leg penetration bottom level.
4
M M
M
Cavity
Containment Building
HVT
IRWST IRWSTM
M
Aux. Building
SCP (5000 gpm)
BAMP (200 gpm)
CVCS
RCS
M
M M
M
M
SteamGenerator
SteamGenerator
ReactorVessel
Reactor CavityFlooding System
External Reactor VesselCooling System
IVR-ERVC in the APR1400 : Active
system (Not passive) & non severe
accident design feature
Schematic Diagram of the APR1400(Advanced Power Reactor)
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Introduction (3)
To evaluate IVR-ERVC
– Thermal load
– Heat removal rate (CHF)
– Success Criteria
CHF > Thermal Load
In general, an increase in natural circulation coolant mass flow rate in cooling channel leads to increase in the heat removal rate at the reactor vessel wall.
To Increase natural circulation flow rate
– Gap configuration to form streamline flow
– Optimal coolant inlet/outlet design
– Steam venting to prevent pressure build-up in annular gap between reactor vessel and insulation
5
Thermal Loading
- Accident Sequence
- Melt Configuration
- Melt Composition
Cooling Water
Circulation Features
Wall CHF
- Geometry
- Flow Condition
100 1000
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CH
F [
MW
/m2]
Mass Flow Rate [kg/sec]
Q = 20 MW
Subcooling 70oC Saturated Cond.
s = 5 cm
s = 10 cm
s = 15 cm
SULTAN Experimental Results
on CHF in CEA/France
Natural circulation flow feature should be evaluated.
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Introduction (4)
Design features of OPR1000 and APR1400
To enhance heat removal rate(increase natural circulation flow)
– APR1400 : Optimal insulation design
– OPR1000: Not yet
6
Design Parameters OPR1000 APR1400
Core Thermal Power (MW) 2815 3983
Fuel(UO2) Mass (ton) 85.6 120.0
Mass for Active Core Zircaloy-4 (ton) 23.9 33.6
Bottom Head Inner Diameter (m) 4.2 4.7
Bottom Head Thickness (cm) 15.2 16.5
Number of ICI Nozzle in the Lower Head 45 61
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
7
Introduction (5)
Objective:
– Analysis of two phase natural circulation mass flow rate in the
annular gap between the outer reactor vessel wall and the
insulation using the RELAP5/MOD3
Contents
– To analyze the coolant circulation coolant mass flow rate in
APR1400 & OPR1000
– To analyze the effects of the coolant injection temperature and
water level on the coolant mass flow rate
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Input Model (1)
RELAP5/MOD3
– This system thermal hydraulic computer code was developed at the INL(Idaho National Laboratory) for the USNRC.
– This 1-D best estimate transient simulation computer code uses six equations on mass, momentum, and energy equations.
– This computer code includes analyses required to support rulemaking, licensing audit calculations, evaluations of accident mitigation strategies, evaluations of operator guidelines, and experiment planning analyses.
– This computer code can be used for the simulation of a wide variety of hydraulic and thermal transients in both nuclear and non-nuclear systems involving mixtures of steam, water, non-condensable, and solute.
8
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Input Model (2)
9
SV20
SV15
SV10
Annulus100(50 Vols,
Cavity Volume)
SJ 21
SJ11
SJ 111
30-1,2
30-3,4
30-5,6
30-7,8
Annulus30-9,10
SJ 16
TDV106
TDJ105
SJ 41
Annulus40-7,10
40-4,7
40-1,3
Annulus 50 (5)
SJ 61
Annulus 60 (10)
SJ 91
SV92
SJ 51
TDV104
SJ 103
SJ63
SJ93
SJ 31
Annulus70(10)
SJ 81
Annulus90(2)
SJ 71
Annulus80(2)
100-1,2
100-3,4
100-5,6
100-7,8
Ht St100-9,10
Ht St100-17,20
100-14,17
100-11,13
Ht St100-21,25
Ht St200-23,24
Ht St200-21,22
Ht St200-11,20
Ht St200-1,10
No. Description
Heat Structure 100 Spherical Reactor Vessel
Heat Structure 200 Cylindrical Reactor Vessel
Single Volume 20 Volume Between the Reactor Vessel
Bottom and the Insulation
Annulus 30, 40 ,50 Volume Between the Spherical
Reactor Vessel and Insulation
Annulus 60,70, 80, 90
Single Volume 92
Volume Between the Cylindrical
Reactor Vessel and Insulation
Annulus 100 Reactor Vessel Outside Cavity
Volume
Single Volume 10 Bottom Side Cavity Volume
Single Volume 15 Bottom Cavity Volume under the
Reactor Vessel
Time Dep. Volume 104 Containment Atmosphere
Time Dep. Volume 106 Water Source (CFST)
Single Junction 16 Water Inlet
Single Junction 63 Water Outlet
Single Junction 93 Steam Outlet
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Input Model (3)
10
Input Conditions OPR1000
(Assumed) APR1400
Water Inlet Area (m2) 1.765 1.765
Water Outlet Area (m2) 1.486 1.672
Steam Outlet Area (m2) 0.372 0.372
Water Outlet Position from the
Reactor Vessel Bottom (m) 5.69 6.14
Steam Outlet Position from the
Reactor Vessel Bottom (m) 8.13 8.60
Distance Between Insulation and
Reactor Vessel Bottom (m) 0.05 0.12
Insulation design for natural circulation flow
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Input Model (4)
Annular gap area
11
Minimum Gap Area Water Inlets
4.50
210.76
42.37
4.50
47.79
56.6 deg
317.17
8.06
3.50
ICI Penetrations
R86.34
3.0 - 6.0
4.50
R99.915
14.51
Shear Key38.69
Steam Venting Slots
R101.34
8.50
I.D. 42.0
Water Level
36.00
Hot Leg
60 deg
120 deg
60 deg
120 deg
Shear Key
Height (m)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Are
a (
m2)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
APR1400
OPR1000
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
12
MAAP4 Results for the APR1400
(from KHNP)
Reduced Results
for the OPR1000
0 20 40 60 80 1000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4 Zone4
Zone3
Zone2Zone1
Heat
Flu
x (
MW
/m2)
Angle (degree)
RELAP5 Input Model (5)
Thermal load
Angle (degree)
0 20 40 60 80
He
at
Flu
x (
MW
/m2)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
APR1000
APR1400
OPR
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Time (sec)
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Ma
ss F
low
Ra
te (
kg
/s)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Water Inlet
Water Outlet
Steam Outlet
Time (sec)
5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Ma
ss F
low
Ra
te (
kg/s
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Water Inlet
Water Outlet
Steam Outlet
13
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (1)
Temporal coolant circulation mass flow rate
– Oscillatory Flow, APR1400 > OPR1000(Annular Gap Area, Thermal Load)
– Some water circulates through the steam outlet because two phase water level increases in the annular gap
APR1400 OPR1000
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
14
Temperature (OC)
40 60 80 100
Ma
ss F
low
Ra
te (
kg/s
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
APR1400
OPR1000
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (2)
Coolant injection temperature effect
– An increase in coolant injection temperature leads to an increase in the coolant circulation mass flow rate.
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (3)
Local pressure and averaged void fraction (OPR1000)
– Coolant Injection Temp ↑ Bubble Generation ↑ Coolant Circulation Mass Flow Rate ↑
15
Height (m)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Lo
cal P
ressu
re (
bar)
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Coolant Injection Temp. = 25 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 50 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 80 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 99 oC
Height (m)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Lo
ca
l V
oid
Fra
ctio
n
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Coolant Injection Temp. = 25 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 50 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 80 oC
Coolant Injection Temp. = 99 oC
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Level (m)
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
Mass F
low
Rate
(kg/s
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (4)
Water level effect in the reactor cavity (OPR1000)
– If water level is lower than the outlet, an decrease in water level
leads to an rapid decrease in the coolant circulation mass flow
rate.
16
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (5)
Local pressure and averaged void fraction (OPR1000)
– If water level is lower than water outlet,
Water level ↓ Local pressure ↓ Challenging distance in gap to flow out ↑ Circulation Mass Flow Rate ↓
17
Height (m)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Lo
ca
l P
ressu
re (
ba
r)
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Water Level = 6.95 m
Water Level = 6.45 m
Water Level = 5.35 m
Water Level = 4.15 m
Water Level = 3.35 m
Height (m)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Lo
ca
l V
oid
Fra
ctio
n0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Water Level = 6.95 m
Water Level = 6.45 m
Water Level = 5.35 m
Water Level = 4.15 m
Water Level = 3.35 m
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
RELAP5 Results & Discussion (6)
Driving mechanism of circulation flow
– Circulation flow = driving force – pressure loss
– Driving force = pressure difference in gap and pool
To increase driving force (higher void fraction)
– higher wall heat flux
– Higher coolant temperature
– Pressure loss = gap pressure, form & friction loss
To decrease pressure loss
– Lower two-phase level in gap
– Larger gap size (minimum gap region)
– Uniform gap (reductions of form loss)
18
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Conclusions (1)
Natural circulation flow features of APR1400 and OPR1000
were examined by RELAP5 code.
– The coolant circulation mass flow rate at high power of the
APR1400 is higher than that at low power of the OPR1000.
– The increase of the coolant injection temperature leads to an
increase in the steam generation rate, which leads to an increase
in the coolant circulation mass flow rate.
– The coolant injection temperature is not effective on the local
pressure, but is effective on the local average void fraction.
– A decrease in the water level in the reactor cavity leads to a
decrease in the local pressure at the lower region and an
increase in the challenging distance in gap, which leads to a
decrease in the coolant circulation mass flow rate.
19
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
Conclusions (2)
It is concluded from the RELAP5 results that the present
design of the reactor vessel insulation in the APR1400 and the
OPR1000 is suitable for the IVR-ERVC.
Verification experiments and a more detailed analysis are
necessary to evaluate the IVR-ERVC in OPR1000.
20
ERMSAR 2015, Marseille March 24 – 26, 2015
21
Thank you for your attention!
Toward the Robust and Resilient Nuclear System for the Highly Improbable Event