pc · • 1 out of 8 cranes to be a specialty crane elevating trolley girder • increase in crane...

37
PC The Owner’s Perspective on Crane Wheel Load Considerations The Owner’s Perspective The Owner’s Perspective on on Crane Wheel Load Crane Wheel Load Considerations Considerations

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • PC

    The Owner’s Perspective

    on

    Crane Wheel Load

    Considerations

    The Owner’s PerspectiveThe Owner’s Perspective

    onon

    Crane Wheel Load Crane Wheel Load

    ConsiderationsConsiderations

  • PC

    Wheel Load ConsiderationsWheel Load ConsiderationsWheel Load Considerations

    New Wharf Design Preparation

    Larger Cranes on Existing Wharves

    New Wharf Design PreparationNew Wharf Design Preparation

    Larger Cranes on Existing WharvesLarger Cranes on Existing Wharves

  • PC

    Evolution of Wheel LoadsEvolution of Wheel LoadsEvolution of Wheel Loads

    In Virginia andOther Ports

    In Virginia andIn Virginia andOther PortsOther Ports

  • PC

    1959 1959 PacecoPaceco

    340 tons340 tons

  • PC

    1967 1967 PacecoPaceco482 tons482 tons

  • PC

    1969 1969 PacecoPaceco

    730 tons730 tons

  • PC

    1972 1972 PacecoPaceco 868 tons868 tons

  • PC

    1985 1985 KoneKone Dual Hoist 1094 tonsDual Hoist 1094 tons

  • PC

    1990 1990 CemcoCemco 954 tons954 tons

  • PC

    1997 1997 NoellNoell 1157 tons1157 tons

  • PC

    2003 ZPMC 1656 tons2003 ZPMC 1656 tons

  • PC

    2004 ZPMC Elevating Girder Crane 1826 tons2004 ZPMC Elevating Girder Crane 1826 tons

  • PC

    2005 ZPMC Twin Forty 1858 tons2005 ZPMC Twin Forty 1858 tons

  • PC

    Preparations for Designinga New Wharf –

    Operational Considerations

    Preparations for DesigningPreparations for Designinga New Wharf a New Wharf ––

    Operational ConsiderationsOperational Considerations

    Crane Type

    Crane parameters

    Brief Case Study

    Crane TypeCrane Type

    Crane parametersCrane parameters

    Brief Case StudyBrief Case Study

  • PC

    Single HoistSingle Hoist

    Dual HoistDual Hoist

    oror

  • PC

    Standard A FrameStandard A Frame

    Low profileLow profile

    oror

  • PC

    Twin TwentyTwin Twenty

    Twin FortyTwin Forty

    oror

  • PC

    Rope Tow TrolleyRope Tow Rope Tow TrolleyTrolley

    Machinery on Machinery on TrolleyTrolley

    oror

  • PC

    Specialty CranesSpecialty Cranes

  • PC

    Other Operational ConsiderationsCrane parameters

    Other Operational ConsiderationsOther Operational ConsiderationsCrane parametersCrane parameters

    Outreach

    Lift height

    Backreach

    Rated capacity

    Local storm wind

    OutreachOutreach

    Lift heightLift height

    BackreachBackreach

    Rated capacityRated capacity

    Local storm windLocal storm wind

  • PC

    Case StudyVirginia Wharf Expansion

    Case StudyCase StudyVirginia Wharf ExpansionVirginia Wharf Expansion

  • PC

  • PC

    Crane TypeCrane TypeCrane TypeSingle Hoist or Dual Hoist ?

    Rope Tow Trolley (RTT) or Machinery on Trolley (MOT) ?

    Single Hoist or Dual Hoist ?Single Hoist or Dual Hoist ?

    Rope Tow Trolley (RTT) or Machinery on Rope Tow Trolley (RTT) or Machinery on Trolley (MOT) ?Trolley (MOT) ?

  • PC

    Advantages of MOTAdvantages of MOTAdvantages of MOT

    Reduced maintenance expense • less wire rope

    • Fewer sheaves

    • No wire supports

    Potential for increased reliability.

    Reduced maintenance expense Reduced maintenance expense •• less wire ropeless wire rope

    •• Fewer sheavesFewer sheaves

    •• No wire supportsNo wire supports

    Potential for increased reliability.Potential for increased reliability.

  • PC

    Disadvantages of MOTDisadvantages of MOTDisadvantages of MOTIncreased wheel loads – 15 – 30%Potential wheel slipHeavier festoonIncreased energy consumptionSlower trolley accelerations

    Increased wheel loads Increased wheel loads –– 15 15 –– 30%30%Potential wheel slipPotential wheel slipHeavier festoonHeavier festoonIncreased energy consumptionIncreased energy consumptionSlower trolley accelerationsSlower trolley accelerations

  • PC

    VIT Operator Tests VIT Operator Tests APL CranesAPL Cranes

  • PC

    Crane ParametersCrane ParametersCrane Parameters

    Outreach 26 wide

    Lift height 130 feet Backreach 75 feet

    Rated capacity 65/80 tons

    Storm wind 110 mph ASCE Basic

    Outreach 26 wide Outreach 26 wide

    Lift height 130 feet Lift height 130 feet BackreachBackreach 75 feet75 feet

    Rated capacity 65/80 tons Rated capacity 65/80 tons

    Storm wind 110 mph ASCE BasicStorm wind 110 mph ASCE Basic

  • PC

    Resulting Wharf DesignResulting Wharf DesignResulting Wharf DesignBasis:• Rope tow trolley cranes• 1 out of 8 cranes to be a specialty crane

    Elevating Trolley Girder • Increase in crane parameters

    Wheel load requirement +40%over existing 100 ft gage wharf

    Basis:Basis:•• Rope tow trolley cranesRope tow trolley cranes•• 1 out of 8 cranes to be a specialty crane1 out of 8 cranes to be a specialty crane

    Elevating Trolley Girder Elevating Trolley Girder •• Increase in crane parametersIncrease in crane parameters

    Wheel load requirement +40%Wheel load requirement +40%over existing 100 ft gage wharfover existing 100 ft gage wharf

  • PC

    Controlling Wheel Loadsfor Larger Cranes on Existing

    Wharves

    Controlling Wheel LoadsControlling Wheel Loadsfor Larger Cranes on Existing for Larger Cranes on Existing

    WharvesWharves

  • PC

    Reduce Structural MaterialReduce Structural MaterialReduce Structural Material

    Boom

    Leg and beam members

    BoomBoom

    Leg and beam membersLeg and beam members

  • PC

    Lattice BoomLattice Boom

    vicevice

    Box Beam BoomBox Beam Boom

  • PC

    Redistribute WeightRedistribute WeightRedistribute Weight

    Change trolley stow location

    Change boom stow position

    Change trolley stow locationChange trolley stow location

    Change boom stow positionChange boom stow position

  • PCChanging Boom Stow PositionChanging Boom Stow Position

  • PC

    Other Ways to ReduceWheel Loads

    Other Ways to ReduceOther Ways to ReduceWheel LoadsWheel Loads

    Reduce wind loads• Aerodynamic shaped members• Narrower members

    Limit Outreach

    Reduce wind loadsReduce wind loads•• Aerodynamic shaped membersAerodynamic shaped members•• Narrower membersNarrower members

    Limit OutreachLimit Outreach

  • PCLimited OutreachLimited OutreachNew Cranes on Existing WharfNew Cranes on Existing Wharf

  • PC

    Justify Higher Wharf LoadsJustify Higher Wharf LoadsJustify Higher Wharf LoadsRevaluate wharf design• Strut and tie method

    Review pile driving records

    Load test wharf

    Strengthen the wharf - expensive

    Revaluate wharf designRevaluate wharf design•• Strut and tie methodStrut and tie method

    Review pile driving recordsReview pile driving records

    Load test wharfLoad test wharf

    Strengthen the wharf Strengthen the wharf -- expensiveexpensive

  • PC

    Bottom LineBottom LineBottom Line

    New wharf …………..Plan Ahead

    Existing wharves……….Be creative

    New wharf …………..New wharf …………..Plan AheadPlan Ahead

    Existing wharves……….Existing wharves……….Be creativeBe creative