payment process update · 2019. 8. 3. · •payment predicaments and paradise ... •monthsof...
TRANSCRIPT
1
1
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Payment Process Update
CRF Credit & A/R Forum and EXPO—Seattle, WAAugust 13, 2019
Robert Unger, Senior Director Product Management &Strategic Corporate Relations
Nacha
2
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
The ACH Payment NetworkACH (Automated Clearing House) Network refers to a specific electronic payment network.
– The ACH Network is used for business, government and consumer domestic and international payments
– Funds are moved between bank accounts by the banks
– Payments settle within 1 day for “Classic ACH”; payments settle in the same day for “Same Day ACH”
– The Network is governed by Nacha
2
3
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
The Awesome Payments News Network
Today’s Headline:
ACH Network Moves 23 Billion Payments and
$51 Trillion in 2018
4
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Nacha
Establishes the legal foundation for the ACH Network
Provides a common set of rules and formats
Creates certaintyand interoperability
Defines roles and responsibilities
www.nacha.orghttps://www.nacha.org/rules
3
5
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Agenda
• Caesar Salad
• Payment Predicaments and Paradise
• Credit Conundrums and Opportunities
6
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Classic Caesar Salad
4
7
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Romaine in Ruins (current scenario)
• 200+ sickened by E. coli outbreak 2018 • Months of investigation revealed that the Yuma outbreak was caused
by irrigation of lettuce using contaminated water.
• Slow investigation process• Regulatory bodies and retailers must collect data from all parties and
piece it together manually to determine the source of the issue. The process can take days or weeks.
• Pathway: Farm, processing facility, transportation, distribution center, delivery to store, selected by customer
8
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Romaine Rising (next generation scenario)
• Leverage technology to improve food safety• The food system is absolutely too large for any single entity to track.
• Blockchain Food Safety Alliance• “ .. relies on IBM's Blockchain Platform, which serves as a distributed ledger
and provides an immutable and auditable trail of data concerning food products. It allows information to be taken and retrieved at various points in the supply chain, such as production, handling, and retail.”
• New Walmart supplier policy: “All fresh leafy greens suppliers are expected to be able to trace their products back to farm(s) (by production lot) in seconds – not days.”
5
9
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
• Blockchain is a system of recordkeeping. • When a piece of permissioned information (or “block”) gets entered into
the chain, other computers in the network are notified.
• Blockchain is a form of distributed ledger technology• It is not centralized – but instead “distributed” among ”nodes” each
which owns its own data
• A blockchain itself serves no purpose• An application must be built upon it
What is Blockchain? (hint: it’s not Bitcoin)
10
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Characteristics of a Blockchain Project
Many players, overlapping
relationships,no direct
contract or contacts
among all parties
Broken business model(s)
Common desire by
players for a better
outcome(economic, compliance, regulatory)
6
11
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Applying this to the Caesar Salad Caper
Many Players
Farms, processors,
transportationdistribution
centers, stores
Broken Model
Supply chain information distributed, not easily
shared - days or months to
conduct investigation
Common Need for
Better Result
Safe Romaine
12
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
The Payments Predicament
7
13
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
14
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
The Payments Predicament
• Buyers and suppliers need to exchange lots of information.
1. The “phone book” dilemma:• Exchanging trading partner information is inefficient and
cumbersome – there is no central source
2. Exchanging information introduces risk• Data quality• Fraud
8
15
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Payments Use Case: Supplier Onboarding
• Friction remains for obtaining/providing – and maintaining - information for supplier master/customer master so a payment can be sent/received:
• W9/company profile• Compliance warranties• Certifications• Contact• Payment options/instructions• ……
• Current process• May take AP 2-3 weeks to onboard a new supplier• AR needs to constantly respond to information requests – and obtain information for
customer master• What happens when key information changes?
16
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Current Supplier Onboarding Use Case
AP AR1. Interact directly
2. Use third party/AP networks, which have some overlap, some
unique supplier references
9
17
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Supplier Onboarding Paradise
18
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Applying Blockchain to AP Onboarding
Many Players
AP, AR, banks, third
parties, ERPs,
accounting packages
Broken Model
Information distributed, not easily shared,
unnecessary costs,
continued fraud
Common Need for
Better Result
Lower payment cost
(check vs ACH),
reduce risk
10
19
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Credit/Receivables Department Conundrums
• We asked you:
• Is there friction in current credit/receivables processes for obtaining/providing information with customers and third parties?
• This is what you said …….
20
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Credit Department: Providing Information to Customers (via Third Party – AP Portal)
Yes No0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
Responses
Payment information (e.g., ACH routing and account numbers, card acceptance details, address to send checks, wire payment instructions) 82.14%W-9 information (e.g., Tax Identification Number, business name/address, tax classification, etc.) 42.86%Compliance details (e.g., certificate of insurance, OFAC/AML certifications, EEOC, proof of banking letter, tax exemption, etc.) 14.29%Invoices for uploading to the AP portal 89.29%Other (please specify) 14.29%
Many payers use AP portal services to send their payments to suppliers. These portal services in turn contact your AR team to obtain instructions on how to pay your company. Does your AR team currently interface with AP data exchanges such as Ariba, Coupa, Bottomline/Paymode X, AvidExchange, etc? Information requests include ….
11
21
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Credit Department: Resource Requirements for Providing Customers/Third Parties with Information
Yes No0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
If yes, has interfacing with these AP data exchanges required additional time or resources from your staff (e.g., IT support, additional staff hours, or other expenditures)?
Responses
22
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Credit – Collecting Information From Customers
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
Considering your AR and credit processes, what information does your company collect from customers to create a new record in your customer master (check
all that apply)?
Responses
12
23
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Credit – Collecting Information About Customers
Yes No0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
Does your company use any third-party data providers or services to verify or maintain customer master and
credit analyses? (ex: D&B, Experian, Equifax, Cortera)
Responses
24
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Is Credit Ready for Blockchain?
• Are there multiple parties in this ecosystem?• Is establishing trust between all the parties an issue? • Do all the parties need to work with shared, complex business logic?• Does the process depend on an extended business network?• Are there many players, overlapping relationships, and no direct contract
among all parties?
• Is the current business model for these processes broken?• Does the current environment add costs/introduce risk?• Are we competing on problems that should be collectively solved?
• Are there a common desire for a better outcome?• Would all parties benefit?• Is there interest/need in changing the ecosystem vs an individual company?
13
25
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Applying Blockchain to Credit
Many Players
Credit, AP, AR, banks, collection agencies,
ERPs, credit bureaus
Broken Model
Information distributed, not easily shared,
unnecessary costs,
continued fraud
Common Need for
Better Result
Chain of trust, lower costs, reduce risk,
enhance compliance
26
© 2019 Nacha. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be used without the prior written permission of Nacha. This material is not intended to provide any warranties or legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only.
Let’s Discuss ….