paw drill results sept 2011
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
1/7
Figure 1: Location of Drilling and Geological Mapping
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
2/7
Figure 2: Diamond Drilling Results for Nb2O5
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
3/7
Figure 3: Diamond Drilling Results for REO
*Note that the potential quantities and grades of the above REO estimates are conceptual in nature, and there is insufficientexploration to date to define a current mineral resource and therefore it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target beingdelineated as a current mineral resource. A qualified person as defined under National Instrument 43-101 has not completedsufficient work to classify the above mentioned historical estimate as a current mineral resource. The Company is not treating thehistorical estimate as a current mineral resource. The historical estimate is not compliant with NI 43-101 and should not be reliedupon.
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
4/7
Figure 4: Cross Section A-A Showing Niobium Intersections
Figure 5: Cross Section B-B Showing REO Intersections
*Note that the potential quantities and grades of the above REO estimates are conceptual in nature, and there is insufficient
exploration to date to define a current mineral resource and therefore it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being
delineated as a current mineral resource. A qualified person as defined under National Instrument 43-101 has not completed
sufficient work to classify the above mentioned historical estimate as a current mineral resource. The Company is not treating the
historical estimate as a current mineral resource. The historical estimate is not compliant with NI 43-101 and should not be relied
upon.
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
5/7
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
6/7
Table 2: Individual REO as a Percentage to Total REO (Diamond Core Assays to Date)
REOLIGHT=87.68% REOHEAVY= 5.50%
La2O3 Ce2O3 Pr2O3 Nd2O3 Sm2O3 Eu2O3 Gd2O3 Tb2O3 Dy2O3 Ho2O3 Er2O3 Tm2O3
23.67 41.70 4.42 15.44 2.45 0.73 1.99 0.25 1.23 0.22 0.58 0.07
Notes:1. Average relative REO components are calculated using individual Rare Earth grades in intersections using a 1% REO lower cut for all diamond
-
8/3/2019 PAW Drill Results Sept 2011
7/7
Table 3: Mrima Hill Diamond Drill Results, +0.20% Niobium
East N orth T otalDepth Azimuth Dip From To Interval Recovery Nb2O5 MnO2 U Th
m m m m m m % % % ppm ppm
90 0. 00 14.65 14. 65
14.65 35.65 21.00 52.4 0.75 18.7 3 643
35.65 38.65 3.00
38.65 41.65 3.00 61.7 1.35 16.4 9 512
and 45.00 46.00 1.00 95.0 0.29 6.7 1 145
and 49.00 50.00 1.00 88.0 0.49 3.6 0 100
and 53.20 56.75 3.55 56.3 0.15 6.3 5 236
90 0.00 7.20 7.20
14.70 16.70 2.00 45.0 0.28 3.1 13 194
and 19.20 31.20 12.00 87.3 0.55 2.9 35 544
31.20 36.45 5.25
36.45 65.70 29.25 78.6 1.14 5.8 76 1426
including 47.70 53.70 6.00 93.0 1.83 4.2 88 1443
and 65.70 67.20 1.50
and 67.20 134.70 67.50 81.5 0.47 8.5 41 518
60 0.00 8.20 8.20
8.20 17.00 8.80 45.1 0.45 17.1 36 510
17.00 23.00 6.00
23.00 35.00 12.00 48.0 0.91 8.6 23 547
35.00 42.50 7.50
42.50 45.50 3.00 33.3 0.30 18.4 11 270
45.50 51.50 6.00
51.50 54.50 3.00 33.3 0.56 11.1 22 392
54.50 62.00 7.50
62.00 63.50 1.50 60.0 0.74 10.8 10 243
63.50 66.50 3.00
66.50 69.50 3.00 49.3 1.02 7.3 18 403
69.50 70.50 1.00
70.50 82.00 11.50 64.7 1.05 6.9 17 537
and 84.50 89.10 4.60 71.1 0.97 0.8 20 670
90 0.00 40.15 40.15 75.9 0.75 9.0 20 209and 49.60 86.65 37.05 66.8 0.90 11.5 40 304
and 97.15 98.15 1.00 60.0 0.22 10.7 10 149
60 0.00 8.15 8.15 46.6 1.05 8.1 43 545
8.15 11.15 3.00
11.15 12.65 1.50 63.3 0.44 25.5 40 266
12.65 23.40 10.75
23.40 63.00 39.60 73.0 1.70 13.9 33 509
including 34.40 54.65 20.25 73.3 2.29 15.1 38 591
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
IS
INTERCEPTSHOLEID COORDINATES
13563.09504570528952PAWDD005
0100.29503771528686PAWDD004
32589.1
IS
9503710528595PAWDD003
0134.79504240529085PAWDD002
056.759504075529110PAWDD001
Notes:1. Coordinate system UTM Zone 37S WGS84.
2. Hole PAWDD005 has only been partially sampled, with a final drill depth of 146m.
3. 1m assay undertaken by Genalysis assay labs in Perth Western Australia by peroxide fusion sample dissolution followed
by ICPMS.
4. Intersections calculated using a 0.20% Nb2O5 lower cut with a maximum 2m internal dilution.
5. IS = Recovery fell below 30% and therefore results not reported