patient safety unit - queensland health · the emergency department patient experience survey 2013...
TRANSCRIPT
Queensland Health Emergency Department Patient Experience Survey 2013
Queensland
May and June 2013
Patient Safety Unit
ii
Government Statistician
Level 8, 33 Charlotte Street
Brisbane, QLD, 4000
Ph: (07) 3035 6436
© Queensland Government 2013
This report is for the exclusive use of Queensland Health without restriction.
All data and information in this document are believed to be accurate and have come from sources believed to be reliable. However, Government Statistician, Queensland Treasury and Trade, does not guarantee or represent that the data and information are accurate, up to date or complete, and disclaims liability for all claims, losses, damages or costs of whatever nature and howsoever occurring, arising as a result of relying on the data and information, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty or otherwise.
22 November 2013 Final Version A
iii
Contents 1 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 1
1.1 Survey details, sample size and response rate ............................................... 1
1.2 Headline survey results ................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Overall satisfaction ................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 Most favourable and unfavourable patient experience ........................... 1
1.2.3 Patient experience compared with 2011 ................................................ 2
2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3
3 Overall satisfaction .......................................................................................... 4
4 Arrival at Emergency Department ................................................................... 5
4.1 Main reason for attending Emergency Department ......................................... 6
4.2 Patient recall of triage process ........................................................................ 7
4.3 Sufficient privacy at triage ............................................................................... 8
4.4 Courtesy of Emergency Department receptionist ............................................ 9
5 Waiting .......................................................................................................... 10
5.1 Length of time waited before being examined by a doctor or nurse .............. 11
5.2 Told expected wait time to be examined ....................................................... 12
5.3 Told reason for wait to be examined ............................................................. 13
5.4 Patients ever worried they had been forgotten.............................................. 14
6 Doctors and nurses ....................................................................................... 15
6.1 Condition and treatment explained in a way patients understood ................. 16
6.2 Doctors and nurses listened to patients ........................................................ 17
6.3 Doctor or nurse discussed patients' worries/fears about conditions or treatments ..................................................................................................... 18
6.4 Confidence and trust in doctors and nurses .................................................. 19
6.5 Doctors and nurses talked in front of patients as if not there ........................ 20
7 Care and treatment ....................................................................................... 21
7.1 Treated with respect and dignity ................................................................... 22
7.2 Treated with kindness and understanding..................................................... 23
7.3 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided ....................... 24
7.4 Understandable answers to patients' questions ............................................ 25
7.5 Reasons patient did not ask questions about care and treatment ................ 26
7.6 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided to family, carer, someone else ...................................................................................... 27
7.7 Sufficient privacy during examination or treatment ....................................... 28
7.8 Assistance from staff when needed .............................................................. 29
7.9 Conflicting information provided by staff ....................................................... 30
iv
7.10 Involved as much as desired in decisions about care and treatment ............ 31
7.11 How many staff introduced themselves......................................................... 32
8 Tests ............................................................................................................. 33
8.1 Reason for tests explained in understandable way ....................................... 34
8.2 Test results explained in understandable way .............................................. 35
9 Pain ............................................................................................................... 36
9.1 In pain ........................................................................................................... 37
9.2 Everything possible done to control pain....................................................... 38
10 Environment and facilities ............................................................................. 39
10.1 Cleanliness of Emergency Department ......................................................... 40
10.2 Cleanliness of toilets ..................................................................................... 41
10.3 Availability of food and drink.......................................................................... 42
10.4 Patients feeling bothered or threatened by patients/visitors .......................... 43
11 Leaving the Emergency Department - Delays ............................................... 44
11.1 Patients delayed leaving Emergency Department ........................................ 45
11.2 Reasons for delay in leaving Emergency Department .................................. 46
12 Leaving the Emergency Department - Medications ...................................... 47
12.1 How to take new medications explained ....................................................... 48
12.2 Purpose of new medications explained ......................................................... 49
12.3 Told about side effects of new medications .................................................. 50
13 Leaving the Emergency Department - Information ........................................ 51
13.1 Given enough information about how to manage care at home .................... 52
13.2 Given written/printed information about condition or treatment ..................... 53
13.3 Advised when to resume usual activities ....................................................... 54
13.4 Advised about danger signs of illness/treatment ........................................... 55
13.5 Advised who to contact if concerned about condition/treatment ................... 56
14 Leaving the Emergency Department - Coordination of follow-up services .... 57
14.1 Arrangements for services ............................................................................ 58
15 Leaving the Emergency Department - Destination ........................................ 59
15.1 Destination after leaving the Emergency Department ................................... 60
16 Complaints .................................................................................................... 61
16.1 Information on how to provide feedback ....................................................... 62
Appendix A: General information .......................................................................... 63
A.1 Survey objectives .......................................................................................... 63
A.2 Methodology .................................................................................................. 63
A.2.1 Questionnaire design ............................................................................ 63
A.2.2 Scope ................................................................................................... 63
v
A.2.3 Sampling ............................................................................................... 64
A.2.4 Peer groups .......................................................................................... 64
A.2.5 Pre-approach letter and data collection ................................................ 65
A.2.6 Response rate ...................................................................................... 65
A.2.7 Sample characteristics and weighting .................................................. 66
A.3 Data analysis and presentation ..................................................................... 67
A.3.1 Graphs .................................................................................................. 67
A.3.2 Output interpretation ............................................................................. 68
A.3.3 Significance testing ............................................................................... 68
A.3.4 Cautionary note .................................................................................... 68
Appendix B: Peer groups ...................................................................................... 69
Appendix C: Definitions of favourable and unfavourable ....................................... 70
Appendix D: Methodology used to rank hospitals for each graph ......................... 74
Appendix E: Hospital results ................................................................................. 78
Appendix F: Adult Questionnaire .......................................................................... 84
Tables Table 1: Breakdown of responses by month of visit ............................................... 65
Table 2: Sample characteristics ............................................................................. 66
Table 3: Hospitals in each peer group ................................................................... 69
Table 4: Definitions of favourable and unfavourable responses ............................ 70
Table 5: Weights used in sorting hospitals for each graph .................................... 74
Table 6: Key to symbols in tables of estimates ...................................................... 79
Table 7: Key results for Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals ................... 80
Table 8: Key results for Large Hospitals ................................................................ 81
Table 9: Key results for Medium and Small Hospitals ............................................ 82
Table 10: Key results for Children's Hospitals ...................................................... 83
1
1 Executive summary
1.1 Survey details, sample size and response rate The Emergency Department Patient Experience Survey 2013 was conducted by the Government Statistician’s office on behalf of Queensland Health. The survey was conducted using computer assisted telephone interviewing in August and September 2013. This is the second time this survey has been run in Queensland, the previous time being in 2011.
A total of 10,626 interviews were completed of patients who visited the Emergency Department of Queensland public hospitals in May and June 2013. The overall response rate for the survey was 60%.
The 35 largest public hospitals in Queensland utilising the Emergency Department Information System were included in the survey, 30 of which were also included in the 2011 survey. Hospitals have been grouped into four 'peer groups' that provide similar services to allow for valid comparisons between hospitals within each peer group (see Appendix B). The results of this survey will be used in monitoring and evaluating the quality of health services provided and to assist in quality improvement activity planning at the hospital and statewide levels. The results from this survey will be compared to the results from the previous survey where possible.
1.2 Headline survey results
1.2.1 Overall satisfaction Seventy-four per cent of Emergency Department patients in Queensland Hospitals rated the care they received in the Emergency Department as ‘Excellent’ or ‘Very good’, and 23% rated it as ‘Good’ or ‘Fair’.
This is less favourable than in 2011 (77% ‘Excellent’ or ‘Very good’ and 19% ‘Good’ or ‘Fair’).
1.2.2 Most favourable and unfavourable patient experience The following areas received the highest proportions of favourable ratings and the highest proportions of unfavourable ratings from Emergency Department patients in Queensland. See Appendix C for the favourable/unfavourable classification of responses.
Areas of most favourable patient experience
• 98% rated the cleanliness of the Emergency Department as ‘Very clean’ or ‘Fairly clean’
• 94% had all or some of the staff introduce themselves
• 93% rated the cleanliness of toilets as ‘Very clean’ or ‘Fairly clean’
• 93% were not bothered or threatened by other patients/visitors
• 90% had confidence and trust in all or most of the doctors and nurses.
Areas of most unfavourable patient experience
• 85% did not see or receive information in the Emergency Department about how to give feedback about the care they received
• 78% were not told the expected wait time to be examined
2
• 72% were not told why they had to wait
• 61% were not given written information about their condition/treatment
• 50% were not told, were only told to some extent, or did not need information, about side effects of new medications.
1.2.3 Patient experience compared with 2011 Queensland public hospital Emergency Department results from the 2013 survey were compared with the 2011 survey results. The areas that had statistically significantly more favourable and less favourable results than in 2011 are listed below. See Appendix C for the favourable/unfavourable classification of responses.
Areas of improved performance
• Patient recall of triage process (70% vs 67%)
• Told expected wait time to be examined (22% vs 15%)
• Not ever worried about being forgotten (86% vs 84%)
• Sufficient information about condition or treatment provided (83% vs 81%)
• Sufficient privacy during examination or treatment (89% vs 86%)
• Assistance from staff when needed (73% vs 69%)
• All or some staff introduced themselves (94% vs 92%)
• Not bothered or threatened by patients/visitors (93% vs 91%)
• Given written/printed information about condition or treatment (39% vs 35%)
• Adequately advised when to resume usual activities (62% vs 58%)
• Danger signs of illness/treatment adequately explained (63% vs 57%).
Areas of reduced performance
• Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) (74% vs 77%)
• Everything possible done to control pain (75% vs 78%).
3
2 Introduction The Emergency Department Patient Experience Survey 2013 was conducted by the Government Statistician’s office on behalf of Queensland Health. The survey was conducted using computer assisted telephone interviewing from July to September 2013.
This is the second time this survey has been run in Queensland, the previous time being in 2011. Of the 35 hospitals that participated in the 2013 survey, 30 were also included in the 2011 survey. See Appendix B for the hospitals that participated in 2011.
For each participating hospital, a random group of eligible patients who had attended the Emergency Department during May or June 2013 was selected. For children's hospitals, parents or guardians of children were interviewed on their child's behalf. For more details on sampling and eligibility criteria, see Appendix A.
This report presents the findings from the 2013 survey of Emergency Department patients. Significance testing was performed to test for differences between 2013 and 2011 and all differences noted in this report are significant at the 5% level (p<0.05).
Values are displayed on the graphs in Sections 3 to 16 where space allows and are rounded to whole numbers. Due to these factors, the sum of responses displayed may not always equal 100%.
Only the relevant categories have been included in calculating the percentages used for each graph, with responses such as ‘Didn’t need’ and ‘Don’t know’ generally not included. Please refer to Appendix C for more information on the response categories included and excluded from each graph.
More information on the methodology is included in Appendix A.
4
3 Overall satisfaction Overall satisfaction was measured with the single question: Overall, how would you rate the care (you / your child) received in the Emergency Department (‘Excellent’; ‘Very good’; ‘Good’; ‘Fair’; ‘Poor’; or ‘Very poor’)?
The results for Queensland were significantly less favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
454245
4039
50
534748494850
464849
444342
464244
4840394041
373736
433837
3441
3740
3437
3133
31
3231
3031
3233
353332303329
332927
33333528
333024
363534
293434
3226
3232
3326
3128
3528
3631
33
1517
1718
1811
91314
1411
1415
1817161917
161618
171518
17212020
23161822
2218
211917
2120
2220
465
67
4
4
455
5
4884
874
65467
87
810
769
889
9
44
644
44
5
44
9,20510,615
2,1344,5593,311
611
305308309314306304305304303306305305306306305306310307305309308308309305308296248306274304304305307298307
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRBWH
PAHRmaMCHRob
MarybNmbrEmldMkyCal
TPCHCrnsBund
RdlndTTHMAHQEIIGym
TmbaCab
HBayIps
CapBeaud
GCHBilo
RocknMtIsaRdclfWck
GdstnInnsfLgn
KroyPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
5
4 Arrival at Emergency Department Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. What was the MAIN reason that you (went / took your child) to the Emergency Department?
2. Do you remember taking part in the triage process?
3. Were you given enough privacy when discussing (your / your child's) condition with the triage nurse?
4. How would you rate the courtesy of the Emergency Department receptionist?
6
4.1 Main reason for attending Emergency Department All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: What was the MAIN reason that you (went / took your child) to the Emergency Department?1
1 Note that the category "It was free" was added in 2013.
4145
3847
5440
3540
3337
4334
43
4942
4838
4645
625658
4642
464645
43
5160
4265
5752
584749
5860
3747
2925
3124
1816
322438
3826
2934
2930
2325
2829
101813
2030
182429
27
1413
2711
152412
1826
1214
1811
1921
2519
1433
2731
2322
2528
18
1222
1626
2219
1314
1123
2122
2417
21
22101910
1515
1118
1016
11
3429
87
8117
55
4
84
116
46
118
159
610
586
1013
101110
71614
121010
68
4
4
9,19810,614
2,1314,5603,312
611
306296302309308304306
304307310309297310305306275308305305304305310
308249305306302305305308307313304
306305
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
CrnsGCHNmbrPAH
RBWHTPCH
TTH
BundCab
HBayIps
LgnMAH
MarybMky
MtIsaQEII
RdclfRdlnd
RobRocknTmba
BeaudBiloCal
CapEmld
GdstnGymInnsfKroyRmaWck
MCHRCH
Percentage (%)
Hos
pita
ls o
rder
ed b
y pe
er g
roup
You or somebody else decided that (you / your child) needed to go to an Emergency Dept
(You were / your child was) taken to the Emergency Dept by the Ambulance
You were told to (go / take your child) by the 13HEALTH hotline service or another health professional
(Your / your child's) doctor was not available or you were not aware of any other available service
You wanted a second opinion
It was free
Some other reason
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals
Large Hospitals
Medium and Small Hospitals
Children's Hospitals
7
4.2 Patient recall of triage process All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Do you remember taking part in the triage process?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
6770
657172
79
82818180
7877767676
73757474
71717071
686969696868
676768
66676765
626363
6061
4
44
5
4
7
4
5
4
5
445
5
2320
221919
13
1416
1413
131516
171717
2017
16202120
2018
221720222121
252123
2218
2526
232124
22
58
10775
45
7445545
78666876
1097876
97
811
88
101210
15
9,21310,626
2,1344,5653,316
611
305275305310306305303305314310249304305306308307309306305305310305298308308306308308306306304309306306296
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMtIsaWck
HBayMCHRdclfEmld
RdlndRmaMAHBiloRob
MarybGym
BeaudKroy
IpsMky
TPCHGdstnTmba
CalLgnCabQEIICap
InnsfRBWH
CrnsTTH
NmbrPAH
RocknBundGCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes
Don't know
No
I did not discuss (my / my child's) condition with a triage nurse
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
8
4.3 Sufficient privacy at triage Patients or parents/guardians of patients who remembered taking part in the triage process were asked: Were you given enough privacy when discussing (your / your child's) condition with the triage nurse?
75747474
8064
95929191
8786
8283
79798080
7876767678
767477
737174747475
7271
69666665
6364
60
18191919
1430
78
510
1115
111616141317201918141619142124181918152122
22232324282733
877766
4
645675456
876
965
888
10889
101011
910
7
6,2477,4551,3763,2152,367
497
193208216234201187238241205205210210209225184231218210212213232252202225197191206182220204245178222204245
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
BiloBeaudMaryb
RmaCapPAHEmldHBayQEIITTHKroy
GdstnMkyRob
NmbrRdlndGym
TmbaRBWH
InnsfRdclfRCHCab
MtIsaCal
RocknCrnsBundMAHLgn
WckGCH
IpsTPCHMCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
9
4.4 Courtesy of Emergency Department receptionist All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: How would you rate the courtesy of the Emergency Department receptionist?
414242
4041
51
6154
4645464848
4446464444
4140
4345
3646
4042
373939
3635
4136383740
353938
3531
333334
3334
30
2627
36353431
303533
3135
3337
383227
4029
3133
3533
32363728
36333429
352934
3436
191817
1918
14
1214121715
141517
151714181619
2023
1915251723
1822
1720
21191919
2122
221622
20
555
55
5
55
44554
4
47
55
7
96
76
556
45
75
10
44
8,0279,2751,7754,0342,899
567
282249245250250292270273285270288285268265269276271264189272255276282262263266266262265273260264257240271
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHEmldTTH
NmbrPAHRmaRob
MarybMCH
RBWHGym
BeaudHBayInnsfMAHCapQEII
RocknBilo
RdlndMtIsa
MkyTmbaGdstnTPCHBundWckCal
KroyIps
CabLgn
GCHCrnsRdclf
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
10
5 Waiting Patients waiting in the Emergency Department want information about how long they will have to wait, and why they are waiting. Providing this information demonstrates respect and consideration for patients, carers and families. This information also assists in setting expectations.
Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. From the time you first arrived at the Emergency Department, how long did (you / your child) wait before being examined by a doctor or nurse?
2. Were you told how long (you / your child) would have to wait to be examined?
3. Were you told why (you / your child) had to wait to be examined?
4. At any point, did you ever feel worried that staff in the Emergency Department had forgotten about (you / your child)?
11
5.1 Length of time waited before being examined by a doctor or nurse
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: From the time you first arrived at the Emergency Department, how long did (you / your child) wait before being examined by a doctor or nurse?
4042
4539
4340
5350
4849495150
4446
434141
5042
4644
3845
4144
423737
4438
4434
4038
343335
403434
2526
2526
2624
29283231
272425
3226
293133
19292328
3023
252225
2926
1923
1932
2422
222624
2124
22
1313
1214
1217
1313
129
13109
9141515
1013
1313
1016
1417
141115
17141713
1211
1219
16161015
16
1010
910
1011
64
68
797796
108
91210
1297
1311
1211
1113
1110
1116
1612
88
1013
876
876
4
757
5
56
946
6
7758
67
88
910
109
811
1214
912
4
4
4
4
578
4
8,96710,394
2,0684,4653,255
606
304300313300298298290303295244300297287305303299296298302296304302298303301296301300293302270292297303304
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMaryb
RmaEmld
RBWHCrns
NmbrQEII
TPCHBiloMkyCalLgn
BeaudGdstn
TTHBundGymCapPAH
RocknHBayMAHKroy
RdlndTmba
RobCabWck
MCHMtIsaGCHInnsfRdclf
IpsPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
10 minutes or less 11 - 30 minutes31 - 60 minutes 61 minutes - 2 hoursMore than 2 hours - 4 hours More than 4 hours
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
12
5.2 Told expected wait time to be examined Patients or parents/guardians of patients who had to wait before being examined were asked: Were you told how long (you / your child) would have to wait to be examined?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
15212120
2424
3228282627272626262525242322
20202121202020191919191918181818171616
1414
4
85787879
7674
647172717273747373747475
77777777
7979798080798080818080808181838383
8586
6,6847,4961,4043,3042,377
411
216216206222219231189234194233211215214183223228229231194192209223217209219189220230207208192222221227223
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
KroyGdstn
CalMCHRmaCapBilo
MAHTTH
HBayEmldMtIsaInnsfCrnsQEII
RdclfRobWck
NmbrPAH
RBWHGCHMky
TPCHTmbaRCH
RocknIps
MarybCabLgn
RdlndBeaud
BundGym
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes Information shown on a (TV) screen No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
13
5.3 Told reason for wait to be examined Patients or parents/guardians of patients who had to wait before being examined were asked: Were you told why (you / your child) had to wait to be examined?
262828
2630
35
413939
373635
3433333231
292828
262626262626252626252625252424232322222220
747271
7470
64
595959
636464
6667676868
707172737373737373737474747474747676767777787880
6,7167,5611,4203,3292,397
415
221222223200208213197188227208235195219232218232225185216214221233232215234209225193218224198227221207226
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
InnsfMCHRma
NmbrCal
EmldPAHBiloCapCab
MAHTTHKroyRob
GCHQEII
BundCrns
RBWHMtIsa
RocknRdclfWck
GdstnHBay
TPCHTmbaRCHMky
BeaudLgn
GymRdlndMaryb
IpsPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes Information shown on a (TV) screen No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
14
5.4 Patients ever worried they had been forgotten Patients or parents/guardians of patients who had to wait before being examined were asked: At any point, did you ever feel worried that staff in the Emergency Department had forgotten about (you / your child)?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
8486858688
85
9393939292
9090898989888888888786868686868686858484848484838383828281
79
1614151412
15
77788
1010111111121212121314141414141414151616161616171717181819
21
9,17410,610
2,1324,5603,308
610
248303304311306309305305305306304306304306275307308306310308308304310308309305305304305307310303298303295
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
BiloEmld
MarybRmaMkyIpsCal
RCHTPCH
GymGdstnBundRobTTH
MtIsaQEII
RBWHRocknTmbaInnsf
BeaudRdlndHBay
CabPAHCapCrns
NmbrMCHKroyMAHWckLgn
RdclfGCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
No Yes
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
15
6 Doctors and nurses Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. While you were in the Emergency Department, did a doctor or nurse explain (your / your child's) condition and treatment in a way you could understand?
2. Did the doctors and nurses listen to what you had to say?
3. Did a doctor or nurse discuss these worries or fears with you?
4. Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses examining and treating (you / your child)?
5. Sometimes doctors and nurses might talk in front of a patient as if they weren't there. Did this happen to you?
16
6.1 Condition and treatment explained in a way patients understood
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: While you were in the Emergency Department, did a doctor or nurse explain (your / your child's) condition and treatment in a way you could understand?
7778777777
88
9087868484838281807978777979
777876757577777677
7575757573777676
73727270
1717181717
10
910
1114131515
1617
181920161519161922201717191520211919221416152122
1922
65555
4
56465
4665755665
98966
108
8,4559,6911,9574,1902,979
565
282283284272283285277286283275276274288241275283274212290275285279276292284271289276283269278278279276278
(68)(43)
(7)(15)(19)
(2)
(0)(2)(0)(2)(1)(1)(3)(0)(1)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(4)(1)(2)(3)(0)(0)(4)(0)(2)(2)(1)(0)(3)(0)(2)(2)
(688)(892)(170)(360)(318)(44)
(23)(21)(30)(29)(22)(22)(28)(20)(21)(32)(30)(31)(16)(34)(29)(24)(30)(36)(19)(26)(20)(25)(31)(18)(25)(29)(19)(28)(20)(37)(20)(25)(26)(18)(28)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHRmaEmldMky
RBWHInnsfTTH
MarybIps
CrnsRdlnd
RobMtIsaGdstn
CabWckBilo
MAHCal
GymRocknHBayTmbaPAH
NmbrQEII
BundRdclfKroyLgnCap
TPCHGCH
BeaudPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
(Didn't need)
17
6.2 Doctors and nurses listened to patients All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Did the doctors and nurses listen to what you had to say?
8484848484
90
9491
8788
86878787
858587
8484848585848686
8484858483838384
8283
818181
7981
79
1313131313
9
58
1210131112111512101614141312141010141410131414141114131616151914
18
4
44
5
5
4
44
9,16010,590
2,1234,5473,310
610
305304307305313305305309305307275304307300306306302249306305303308305305308302307309305307304295304297306
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRob
InnsfMaryb
RmaMCH
CalTmbaBund
RBWHMtIsa
TPCHQEII
RdclfMkyGymCrnsBilo
HBayIps
EmldPAHTTH
RdlndCab
NmbrKroyMAH
GdstnBeaud
WckGCHCapLgn
RocknPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
18
6.3 Doctor or nurse discussed patients' worries/fears about conditions or treatments
Patients or parents/guardians of patients who had worries or fears about their / their child's condition or treatment were asked: Did a doctor or nurse discuss these worries or fears with you?
515355
5150
63
676059
6360
586062
5956
6163
4949
53495052
5048
525051
4952
464847
5342
4844
4748
36
2931
3232
3031
2833342430332924
2832
1914
373829373330333829
3330322737
32332141
263325
1843
201513
1720
6
477
1310
911
141312
2023
1313
1814
16181714
1918
1918
2117
2020
2717
2524
2834
21
2,3352,675
5681,163
748196
1128481806776916572795681577962
10065757485749090937982717258737371744787
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHPAHTTHCalIps
RBWHMky
BeaudNmbr
MarybHBayRma
RdlndBundMAHWckCab
GCHRdclfQEIICrnsRobLgn
InnsfTmbaGdstn
CapMtIsa
TPCHEmldKroyGymBilo
RocknPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
19
6.4 Confidence and trust in doctors and nurses All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses examining and treating (you / your child)?
7173747273
76
77767778777779
757577
727776
74737374
7270
75717274
727473
6971
6968676969
6664
191717
1715
18
20171514161412
181614
21141417
171817192116
201913161314
19171919
191716
1618
888
910
5
67
66786876
710698877
69
8119
121210121110
1110
101515
56
9,17410,606
2,1294,5593,307
611
305306314305308303304309304303309308305275303305310305308304305305306307304249309310295304298305305306305
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHRmaMky
RBWHCal
TTHTmbaMarybEmldPAHCab
BundMtIsaNmbrCrnsMAHWckQEIIRob
TPCHRdlnd
CapInnsfGymBiloIps
HBayGCHRdclf
LgnKroy
GdstnBeaudRockn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
All of them Most of them Only some of them None of them
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
20
6.5 Doctors and nurses talked in front of patients as if not there
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Sometimes doctors and nurses might talk in front of a patient as if they weren't there. Did this happen to you?
82828182
8681
89888989
8686888887
8486
828285
8282818282828384
808082
8079
8279
7880
7880
7878
1112
1312
1014
8878
1211768
138
15138
131314121213108
15161214169
1316131612
1313
766656
44
566
645
7554665
7855
765
976
86
99
10
9,06310,484
2,0964,5043,283
601
313305302305302303300303302245268304303306301306295300305304303301299301304302305300303301306294301290302
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RmaGymInnsf
TmbaCal
MkyRdclf
GdstnCapBilo
MtIsaPAH
RdlndCabIps
MAHNmbrMCH
BeaudWck
RBWHMarybTPCH
RobTTHKroy
HBayEmldBundRCHQEIILgn
CrnsGCH
RocknPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
21
7 Care and treatment Patient involvement in decisions about their care has multiple benefits. It encourages patients to take greater responsibility for their own health, which may lead to reducing risk factors and associated ill health. Patients involved in decisions about their care are also likely to report higher overall satisfaction with their care.
Patients are better able to engage in decisions about their care when they are provided with sufficient information.
Availability of staff to attend to patients when needed is essential for patients to receive individualised care.
Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. Overall, did you feel (you were / your child was) treated with respect and dignity while in the Emergency Department?
2. Overall, did you feel (you were / your child was) treated with kindness and understanding while in the Emergency Department?
3. While you were in the Emergency Department, how much information about (your / your child's) condition or treatment was given to you?
4. Did you get answers that you could understand?
5. Was this because you didn't have any questions, or for some other reason?
6. How much information about your condition or treatment was given to your family, carer or someone close to you?
7. Were (you / your child) given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
8. If (you / your child) needed attention, were you able to get a member of staff to help you?
9. Sometimes in a hospital, a member of staff may say one thing and another may say something quite different. Did this happen to you in the Emergency Department?
10. Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about (your / your child's) care and treatment?
11. How many of the staff treating and assessing (you / your child) introduced themselves?
22
7.1 Treated with respect and dignity All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Overall, did you feel (you were / your child was) treated with respect and dignity while in the Emergency Department?
8988888888
94
959392929191909090908989888989898888888887878788
878787
8585858585
838383
1010111111
6
5678989
1089
1011111099
101210111111108
11101015131213121414
14 4
9,20210,622
2,1344,5643,313
611
305306308305305303306304305306308309305305310313306309306304310307248275310308305306306298305308307296305
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCH
RBWHMaryb
CalEmldTTHRob
RdlndBundInnsf
IpsTPCH
CapTmbaRmaGymPAHMky
NmbrHBayQEIIBilo
MtIsaMAHCabWckCrns
RocknLgn
GdstnBeaud
KroyGCHRdclf
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, all of the time Yes, some of the time No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
23
7.2 Treated with kindness and understanding All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Overall, did you feel (you were / your child was) treated with kindness and understanding while in the Emergency Department?
Not asked in 201186868685
93
9593
9292
908991
898989
8787888787878686858586
8485838585848583828281828281
12131213
7
5687
10116
1199
1212101211111311141412151316131215121516171715
1316
4
10,6232,1344,5643,314
611
305305306306314305302304308310309308308306249306304306308310305306305309306275305298305307305296310305307
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMaryb
MkyMCHRma
TPCHEmldRob
RBWHTmba
IpsInnsfCab
BundBilo
CrnsNmbrGymQEII
HBayGdstn
TTHRdlnd
PAHCap
MtIsaCalLgn
WckBeaudRockn
GCHMAHRdclfKroy
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, all of the time Yes, some of the time No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
24
7.3 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: While you were in the Emergency Department, how much information about (your / your child's) condition or treatment was given to you?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
8082838184
89
908988
8687
86868586
848584858483848383828281828180808082
807979
777778
7775
1413131312
8
799
11811
11129121211101112111411151413
111416
151591418
1520
18141518
54454
4
5
45444
5
44
65
54
964
6
4865
9,09910,548
2,1184,5263,293
611
305313306303302303305303306301307306305303273303303308303304306305303302301248305307298305309295304301297
(111)(78)(16)(39)(23)
(0)
(0)(1)(0)(2)(1)(3)(3)(2)(0)(4)(1)(3)(1)(2)(2)(2)(2)(2)(5)(2)(2)(3)(1)(4)(4)(1)(4)(3)(6)(1)(1)(1)(3)(5)(1)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRmaMCH
CalEmldMky
InnsfGdstn
TTHMaryb
RBWHPAHCrns
RdlndMtIsaRdclfWck
TmbaBeaud
GymQEIICabRob
BundTPCH
BiloIps
HBayNmbr
CapMAHGCHKroy
RocknLgn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
The right amount
Too much
Not enough
I wasn't given any information about (my / my child's) condition ortreatment
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
25
7.4 Understandable answers to patients' questions Patients or parents/guardians of patients who asked questions about their / their child's care and treatment were asked: Did you get answers that you could understand?
7879797879
88
908787
85828483
81838281
8082
79788181808180
7781
7979
777878
7576
747575
7370
67
171617
1717
11
101211
121713
1417131416181318201515171316211216151817162219231818
1922
24
54454
4
5
444
55
75656645
67889
6,6037,5401,5043,2162,264
556
277279215205231210200215230219235196216212210225214205209215204196197222214220221225170214218204215208194
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHEmld
RBWHMky
MarybInnsf
CalRobRmaMAH
BeaudCrnsWck
BundTTH
IpsGdstnMtIsaPAH
TPCHHBayKroyQEIICabCap
TmbaGCHBilo
NmbrRdlndRdclfGym
RocknLgn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
26
7.5 Reasons patient did not ask questions about care and treatment
Patients or parents/guardians of patients who didn't ask questions about their / their child's care and treatment were asked: Was this because you didn't have any questions, or for some other reason?
8687878689
96
1009593
8787
8293
8588
9691
8982
888685
8292
8390
8489
9582
9381
8784
889494
7487
8473
121011
118
57
1312
176
1411
710
1610
1213
156
147
148
154
169
127
208
1020
4
4566566
2,3672,825
5681,238
96752
267881778483738098928387789684639087687189
102949882826984918426
1065782
100
(16)(11)
(1)(6)(3)(1)
(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)
(63)(70)(16)(24)(28)
(2)
(1)(3)(4)(0)(1)(1)(1)(4)(5)(4)(5)(1)(1)(1)(1)(4)(1)(2)(3)(0)(2)(5)(0)(2)(4)(0)(2)(1)(0)(1)(1)(3)(1)(1)(4)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRdlndEmldTTHCapPAHBilo
CrnsInnsf
RBWHMaryb
CabTmbaRdclf
CalGCH
IpsRmaMAHMky
TPCHBeaudGdstn
LgnGymQEIIRob
NmbrRocknBundMCHHBayMtIsaWckKroy
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Did not have any questions
Too unwell to ask any questions
There wasn't enough time to ask questions
Did not have an opportunity to ask questions
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
(Other reason)
27
7.6 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided to family, carer, someone else
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to your family, carer or someone close to you?
Not asked in 20118687
8586
Not asked for Child
929090898989898888888888878787878786858584858584848383838383
818080
Not asked for ChildNot asked for Child
1412
1414
8101011111111121212121212131313131414141515151616161616171717
1919
5,2721,1952,4881,589
159170121156154199163186165179166188106181137154147154173181188168148141132173170161176164100165147
(80)(17)(34)(29)
(2)(2)(0)(2)(3)(3)(6)(1)(5)(1)(3)(3)(1)(5)(6)(0)(3)(3)(1)(3)(1)(1)(2)(0)(6)(3)(2)(0)(3)(4)(0)(2)(3)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
MkyTTHRmaGCH
RBWHIps
InnsfCabCal
MAHTmbaPAH
MtIsaHBay
MarybWckKroy
GdstnCrns
NmbrBund
RdlndEmldCapGym
TPCHQEIIRob
RdclfBeaud
BiloLgn
RocknMCHRCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
The right amount Too much Not enough
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
28
7.7 Sufficient privacy during examination or treatment All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Were (you / your child) given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
868988889090
96949394939393929292
91919191919190909090
88898988888786878785
82848483
79
119
10988
6756567558777768988
1199
101010129
101116131112
15
4
4
454
6
9,18310,598
2,1284,5553,304
611
313304307248309308305301309305306305306275306303305304306305310305308304303304304305306306307296305307298
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RmaMarybBeaud
BiloPAHCabCap
EmldHBayGym
RBWHMky
TmbaMtIsaMCH
CalRdlndRdclfBundTTHMAHRCH
IpsWck
NmbrRob
TPCHGdstn
KroyRockn
InnsfGCHCrnsQEIILgn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
29
7.8 Assistance from staff when needed All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: If (you / your child) needed attention, were you able to get a member of staff to help you?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
6973
71737675
8584
797981
77787778777777
74737474737474
73727474
7071717071697071
706970
64
2623
24232124
1413
211914222020172019202424222425222124252222282526
2624262422252724
30
5444
4
4
44
44
45
4464575466
7,3618,3681,7443,6252,572
427
251241219240232230188254236237234225252254262247250246239231208248252248246238240212248236240256232245251
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RmaRob
RCHMky
EmldMaryb
BiloCabCapKroy
BeaudGymInnsf
IpsCrns
TmbaTTHPAH
RBWHGdstnMCH
CalQEII
BundRockn
WckTPCHMtIsaMAHHBay
LgnNmbrRdlndRdclfGCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, a member of staff was always present or I could always get help when needed
Yes, sometimes
No, I could not find a member of staff to help
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
30
7.9 Conflicting information provided by staff All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Sometimes in a hospital, a member of staff may say one thing and another may say something quite different. Did this happen to you in the Emergency Department?
818283828483
8988878786848687
8385
838584
818383828384
8283828284
8283
8180818180
78777678
10109
10912
7898
101286
128
1289
14109
1297
108
1010586
101189
101212139
988874
54554
675
75
774
776
898988
119
1199
101010101110
12
9,11010,540
2,1174,5233,296
604
300307303307312301300304307304303305302301302305302249273302305304303306302302307308307305304303305296294
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
EmldInnsfGym
RBWHRmaRCHTTH
MarybBeaud
QEIIMCHTmbaNmbrRdlnd
CalIps
RobBilo
MtIsaTPCH
MkyMAHWckCab
RocknCapPAH
HBayKroyCrns
GdstnRdclfBund
LgnGCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
31
7.10 Involved as much as desired in decisions about care and treatment
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about (your / your child's) care and treatment?
7779797880
85
85838587
8482818181808182
7980817980
7880807978777979
7778777876
74757373
69
161516
1615
12
1314126
1114161415161412171414161417141414161713131714171417
201820
1724
765
75
4754
44456
55454
66766
886
86
876
87
107
8,6229,9591,9714,2713,107
610
305285305283279302282283288285238287281289282292282290288286289282292283281277268295289274284283288272290
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHInnsfMCHEmldPAHRma
RBWHBeaud
MkyTTHBiloCabCal
WckRob
MarybIps
CrnsBundRdclfGymCapKroy
TmbaHBayNmbrMtIsaMAHQEIIGCH
TPCHGdstnRdlnd
LgnRockn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
32
7.11 How many staff introduced themselves All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: How many of the staff treating and assessing (you / your child) introduced themselves?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
71747474
7277
7983
8075
79767777
8080
757474
707475757575
7175737274
7170
737372717372
6865
60
212022
1920
19
2013
152316
2018
181313
202121
252020181918
2418
19211822
24181819
191618
2123
28
654
56
4
4
544
444
544555
786645
7657
77
89
7 5
8,93110,372
2,0834,4533,231
605
303307295300302300299302299243299296295292302300303298297300269300300293296297304303295301298288302296298
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRmaRob
RBWHCabPAH
MarybMCHCapBilo
CrnsMky
TPCHGCH
RdlndTmba
IpsMAHNmbrTTH
MtIsaBundHBayEmldRdclf
CalQEIIGym
GdstnRocknBeaud
LgnKroyInnsfWck
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
All of them Some of them Very few of them None
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
33
8 Tests Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, who had tests during the Emergency Department visit, were asked the following questions:
1. Did a member of staff explain why (you / your child) needed these tests in a way you could understand?
2. Did a member of staff explain the results of the tests in a way you could understand?
34
8.1 Reason for tests explained in understandable way Patients or parents/guardians of patients who had tests during the Emergency Department visit were asked: Did a member of staff explain why (you / your child) needed these tests in a way you could understand?
838585
8386
91
93919191
908990898790
88888788
858586868587
828485
82838383828181
79797981
75
1099
108
7
67757747948876
11109896
1498
131198
11111114131210
13
765
76
444644
6456645666
84
7856897887889
12
5,8646,6791,5963,1161,695
272
130142156109182224155161222134227230163165235165210216226159223177214202117240238232234195232199201149215
(78)(55)(17)(22)(16)
(0)
(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(4)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(5)(3)(2)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(5)(2)(2)(2)(1)(0)(2)(2)(3)(2)(3)(3)(1)(1)(2)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHMtIsa
BiloMkyPAHEmld
MarybRBWH
RmaTTH
NmbrGdstn
WckRob
InnsfBundTmbaMAH
BeaudTPCH
GymCabCal
CapQEIIGCHRdclf
IpsHBayCrns
RocknRdlnd
KroyLgn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
35
8.2 Test results explained in understandable way Patients or parents/guardians of patients who received test results before leaving the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff explain the results of the tests in a way you could understand?
8686868686
92
9593929293929190
898989908989
8787888788
85858584838484848484
828483
817979
1112111212
7
57876679
11101189
912119
119
121313151714141313131612141720
18
4
4
4,2304,8971,2102,3261,141
220
6811410311794
16114110670
15411415218117110817213410219117416416010594
165166172172174141190138157116156
(15)(11)
(4)(5)(2)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(3)(0)(1)(0)(0)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
BiloEmldRCHMCHWck
TmbaMky
BeaudCapIps
MarybRdlnd
RobPAH
MtIsaCrnsGymRmaTTH
RBWHGCHBundInnsfKroyCab
TPCHRdclfNmbrMAHHBayQEIICalLgn
GdstnRockn
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
36
9 Pain Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. Were (you / your child) in any pain while in the Emergency Department?
2. Do you think the Emergency Department staff did everything they could to help control (your / your child's) pain?
37
9.1 In pain All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Were (you / your child) in any pain while in the Emergency Department?
64656567
6153
6163
69636366
70
686667
6270
6765
6265
7170
6769
6765
6357
6165
5866
635757
5259
5157
36353533
3947
3937
31373734
30
323433
3830
3335
3835
2930
3331
3335
3743
3935
4234
374343
4841
4943
9,16310,590
2,1314,5503,310
599
305295303309308305306
305307310308296309302306273308304305303306308
308249305306303304305308305314303
298301
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
CrnsGCHNmbrPAH
RBWHTPCH
TTH
BundCab
HBayIps
LgnMAH
MarybMky
MtIsaQEII
RdclfRdlnd
RobRocknTmba
BeaudBiloCal
CapEmld
GdstnGymInnsfKroyRmaWck
MCHRCH
Percentage (%)
Hos
pita
ls o
rder
ed b
y pe
er g
roup
Yes No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals
Large Hospitals
Medium and Small Hospitals
Children's Hospitals
38
9.2 Everything possible done to control pain Patients or parents/guardians of patients who were in pain while in the Emergency Department were asked: Do you think the Emergency Department staff did everything they could to help control (your / your child's) pain?
The results for Queensland were significantly less favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
78757674
7083
898281
7980
7882
787778797778
76767473
7172717273
6969706969687171
676768
6464
141515
1517
11
91012
1512157
13141310121114
1315
16201618161422
19181920201414222016
2019
8109
1113
6
876
87
1199
1011101110
11111110
11111213
91212121212
1515
1113
161617
5,8176,5581,3322,9681,936
322
175190200206147206189193221188200200181182177183195190203186179166186213197180192188138192170206186186167
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRBWH
BundRob
MCHTTHMky
NmbrQEII
MarybTmba
CabCrnsEmldRma
GdstnRdlndTPCHRdclfPAHInnsfMtIsaGCHMAH
RocknCal
HBayGymBiloIps
KroyLgnCap
BeaudWck
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
39
10 Environment and facilities Violence and aggression in Emergency Departments can be a problem. Aggressive behaviour is likely to have an impact on patients, family, carers, and staff.
Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. In your opinion, how clean was the Emergency Department?
2. How clean were the toilets in the Emergency Department?
3. Were (you / your child) able to get suitable food or drinks when you were in the Emergency Department?
4. While you were in the Emergency Department, did you feel bothered or threatened by other patients or visitors?
40
10.1 Cleanliness of Emergency Department All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: In your opinion, how clean was the Emergency Department?
737576
7481
66
91898888878788
828181
798282
817981
7875777675
7378
76737274
7265
7171
6161
5854
242221
2318
32
8111212131310
171819211716182016
21242222
23261921
252623
243325
223635
3436
4
46
8
8,96010,386
2,0744,4523,252
608
305299299300303310303300296298297246296300301303303305298300298298297302297299303299292302270303281299284
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
CapCal
MkyRob
BeaudRmaInnsfPAHEmldBund
RBWHBilo
TPCHTTHMAHGym
MarybRCHWck
NmbrHBayRdclfCrns
RocknKroy
RdlndTmba
CabGdstn
QEIIMtIsaMCH
LgnIps
GCHPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Very clean Fairly clean Not very clean Not at all clean
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
41
10.2 Cleanliness of toilets All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: How clean were the toilets in the Emergency Department?
66686769
7450
8685
8991
8379
76777977
747575
747372
6868
626867
6170
6562
677072
6269
606363
4542
2726
2425
2042
1415
86
1619
222018
19232121
2323
2227
2633
2526
3421
2732232019
3120
332828
4634
45
644
7
45
54
44
655
88
47
4788
16
7
4
9
4,5104,9081,0832,1151,385
325
113115112142163112128181107166127151109149124159153134160156133149142130148142123107152161141164133165157
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
MkyRmaCap
BeaudPAHBilo
WckMAHEmldBund
MarybTPCHHBay
RobCal
InnsfRBWH
CabRCH
NmbrTmbaRdlndRocknGdstnRdclfTTHGym
MtIsaQEIICrnsLgnIps
KroyMCHGCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Very clean Fairly clean Not very clean Not at all clean
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
42
10.3 Availability of food and drink All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Were (you / your child) able to get suitable food or drinks when you were in the Emergency Department?
Not asked in 2011767877
7270
8686858585
8282818080797878777676767575747474747472727170
68656464636262
242223
2830
1414151515
1818192020212222232424242525262626262628282930
32353636373838
4,112924
1,7551,159
274
14114212612214914212910511312512410512311712193
13597
131109110126107113123123113117108113115729893
132
(77)(21)(32)(17)
(7)
(2)(5)(1)(3)(3)(3)(1)(2)(3)(2)(3)(2)(7)(4)(6)(1)(4)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(1)(2)(3)(1)(2)(2)(2)(3)(3)(1)(1)(2)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
PAHRCH
TmbaBundNmbrMAH
CalRmaCab
RdlndTTHMky
RocknRob
GCHGymCrnsBilo
RBWHHBay
IpsRdclf
BeaudMaryb
LgnTPCHInnsfWckQEIIKroyCap
EmldGdstnMtIsaMCH
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
43
10.4 Patients feeling bothered or threatened by patients/visitors
All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: While you were in the Emergency Department, did you feel bothered or threatened by other patients or visitors?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
9193
9193
9793
99989898979897979797979696959595949494
939493939494
9191919191
8990898888
65
65
5
44
5547454
76767
85688
45
44
4
9,20110,621
2,1344,5643,313
610
313305306249303306305308303308306308307305310305305304304305310298309305305310306305306275308309306308296
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RmaCal
CapBilo
EmldMky
RCHInnsfWck
BeaudGymQEIIKroy
TPCHHBayGdstnRdclfNmbr
RobBundTmba
LgnPAH
MarybRdlndMAHCrnsMCHTTH
MtIsaCabIps
RocknRBWH
GCHPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
44
11 Leaving the Emergency Department - Delays Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked whether or not they were delayed for each of the following reasons:
1. Equipment or aids, such as crutches
2. Medications
3. Someone to discharge (you / your child), e.g. the doctor
4. Test results
5. Letter for (your / your child’s) doctor
6. An ambulance or hospital transport
7. Other transport
8. Services after leaving hospital to be arranged, e.g. social services/follow up
9. Something else (please specify)
These questions were then combined into the following measures for reporting:
1. Patients delayed leaving Emergency Department
2. Reasons for delay in leaving Emergency Department
Note that the way these questions were asked differs from how they were asked in the 2011 survey and therefore no testing for significant differences between 2011 and 2013 has been undertaken for this topic. Similarly, the 2011 estimates are not included in the graphs as any comparison would be misleading.
Note also that questions in this topic were not asked of respondents who were admitted to a ward or transferred to another hospital.
45
11.1 Patients delayed leaving Emergency Department The questions in this topic were combined to indicate whether patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were delayed for any reason once (their / their child's) medical care was finished and (they / their child) were ready to leave the Emergency Department.
Not comparable62
5661
7267
858180
7676
7373
71706969
666665656464646463636261
5958585756565656
52525150
3844
3928
33
151920
2424
2727
29303131
343435353636363637373839
4142424344444444
48484950
7,9011,3813,3802,646
494
246199250247256222230261265243242232254216207206218252236248216216232184224221245224207202244181191196188
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
EmldBilo
WckBeaud
CapInnsfMkyGymRma
MtIsaMCHKroy
MarybTmba
RBWHRob
HBayRCH
GdstnRdlndRockn
TTHCalIps
CabRdclfMAHLgn
BundCrnsQEIIGCH
TPCHPAH
NmbrPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Not delayed Delayed
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
46
11.2 Reasons for delay in leaving Emergency Department Patients and parents/guardians of patients who were delayed when leaving the Emergency Department gave the following reasons for their delay.
This graph shows the patients who reported each reason for delay, as a percentage of patients who reported any delay. Since each patient was able to report more than one reason for their delay, percentages may not add up to 100%.
3
7
9
18
20
26
31
45
5
3
6
20
10
23
20
56
2
9
9
20
18
20
24
38
2
7
9
19
23
27
28
44
4
7
9
17
20
27
41
44
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Something else
Equipment oraids
Services afterleaving hospitalto be arranged
Medications
Transport
Test results
Letter for(their / theirchild's) doctor
Someone todischarge (them/ their child)
Per cent
PR&S Lge M & S Child Qld
47
12 Leaving the Emergency Department - Medications Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, who were prescribed new medications, were asked the following questions:
1. Did a member of staff explain to you how (you / your child) should take the new medications?
2. Did a member of staff explain the purpose of the medications (you were / your child was) to take at home in a way you could understand?
3. Did a member of staff tell you about medication side effects to watch for?
Note that questions in this topic were not asked of respondents who were admitted to a ward or transferred to another hospital.
48
12.1 How to take new medications explained Patients or parents/guardians of patients who were prescribed new medications before leaving the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff explain to you how (you / your child) should take the new medications?
82828282
7994
9595
929191
9085
898786
8384
7784
8282
80828383
7977
7481
767780
747878
7577
7574
68
7666
6
10
49
520477
126
913
17
118
11
6
5
12
45
58
4
44
54
8
6
4
6
9
7179
77
1215
61510
77977
45554
7
55
1011
85
1011
99778
128
61314
75
158
10
1,8851,784
31278360188
4449594442374471564253443439515960406547633860536944595756404943456464
(12)(15)
(5)(10)
(0)(0)
(0)(0)(2)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
MCHCabMky
RCHRob
BundPAHRma
RocknLgn
InnsfIpsCal
RBWHRdclfCrns
MarybTPCHEmldTTHWck
GCHCap
MtIsaRdlndHBay
BeaudTmbaMAH
BiloKroy
GdstnNmbrGymQEII
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely
Yes, to some extent
No
I did not need an explanation
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
49
12.2 Purpose of new medications explained Patients or parents/guardians of patients who were prescribed new medications before leaving the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff explain the purpose of the medications (you were / your child was) to take at home in a way you could understand?
83868586
8391
9493
909191919192
89868987898887898888
8589
8785
8280
8485
838081
7375
8076
7470
7666
84
754
51268567
44
10
58
141554
79
621154
104
11
44
5
48
8
8
7675
65
4
4
655
4
7465
87
644
45
9875788
1414
16
1,8891,793
31678960088
5465424451445971564940643741606139484557435341614439446958346364465849
(8)(6)(1)(4)(1)(0)
(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
MtIsaEmld
LgnRCHRdclfMCHCrnsRma
RocknCabBilo
GymBundRobCapMky
RBWHTTH
IpsMAH
GdstnInnsf
TPCHMarybHBayGCHPAH
RdlndTmba
CalWckQEII
NmbrBeaud
KroyPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely
Yes, to some extent
No
I did not need an explanation
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
50
12.3 Told about side effects of new medications Patients or parents/guardians of patients who were prescribed new medications before leaving the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff tell you about medication side effects to watch for?
445050504848
705559596058
5650
5656
5454
5155
5154
494851
474750
44454847
4546
4141
45373838
29
989
8612
516
64
8175
65
11
11
11125
11115
151257
107
159
1310
57
26222022
2326
1217
215
1311
1718
2319
2413
24201224
1720
2120
3031
2022
1721
2231
3028
3422
4035
38
20202120
2314
1212
1432
2528
191416
2216
2714
2226
192321
2322
1315
2121
292523
1613
2221
2812
2226
1,8521,752
31176559086
4041593971425939526342564351634648384258514446665852595643634262374833
(45)(47)
(6)(28)(11)
(2)
(0)(1)(0)(1)(0)(0)(2)(2)(5)(1)(2)(1)(1)(2)(2)(2)(1)(1)(3)(2)(0)(0)(0)(3)(4)(2)(0)(2)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
BiloRob
BeaudRBWH
RmaLgnMky
TPCHMAHGym
HBayRocknMCHInnsfEmldTTHCab
GCHIps
CapRdclfPAH
NmbrRdlndMarybMtIsaCrns
TmbaRCHQEII
GdstnWck
BundKroyCal
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely
Yes, to some extent
No
I did not need this type of information
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
51
13 Leaving the Emergency Department - Information Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked the following questions:
1. Were you given enough information about how to manage (your / your child's) care at home?
2. Before you left the Emergency Department, were you given any written or printed information about (your / your child's) condition or treatment (excluding letter for doctor)?
3. Did a member of staff tell you when (you / your child) could resume (your / their) usual activities?
4. Did a member of staff tell you about what danger signs regarding (your / your child's) illness or treatment to watch for after you went home?
5. Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about (your / your child's) condition or treatment after you left the Emergency Department?
Note that questions in this topic were not asked of respondents who were admitted to a ward or transferred to another hospital.
52
13.1 Given enough information about how to manage care at home
Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Were you given enough information about how to manage (your / your child's) care at home?
Not asked in 201173727273
83
848384
817978777777767677
71737375
72737475
737173
69707072
6768
6763
68666564
1619
1616
13
13139
11141414131214141223181714191714111617142119171222182228162021
19
109
1211
4
44
78789
10119
1011
699
119
1012
141111
13101113
1611
1312
9161414
17
6,3691,1132,7242,085
447
219228212194191202171165173168153192157144199210158150199178152171179191177172174173204200154207183191178
(25)(4)(9)
(12)(0)
(0)(0)(3)(1)(0)(2)(0)(1)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(2)(0)(0)(1)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(2)(0)(1)(3)(0)(0)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(2)(1)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
MCHRCHRmaEmldMky
MarybTmbaBundRob
RBWHGCH
RdlndCrns
IpsWckGymPAHBilo
MtIsaInnsfNmbrTTHCal
BeaudKroyRdclfCab
HBayCapQEII
TPCHMAH
RocknGdstn
LgnPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
53
13.2 Given written/printed information about condition or treatment
Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Before you left the Emergency Department, were you given any written or printed information about (your / your child's) condition or treatment (excluding letter for doctor)?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
3539
4335
3261
6261
525251
4544434341
3939393838373635343333
3130303029282827
222121
191917
6561
5765
6839
3839
484849
5556575759
6161616262636465666767
6970707071727273
787979
818183
4,5934,274
7691,8801,313
312
15016213611112410710510412413815212212211311112214898
11412311612313710611311811613612711613112911612282
(119)(103)(22)(48)(27)
(6)
(4)(2)(1)(4)(4)(2)(2)(4)(6)(4)(2)(5)(4)(2)(4)(5)(3)(4)(4)(3)(4)(2)(4)(1)(1)(4)(2)(2)(6)(2)(0)(1)(2)(2)(1)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHRob
GCHCrnsPAH
NmbrBund
CalMAHQEII
RdclfTmba
TTHRBWH
WckGym
TPCHMkyCab
GdstnRma
RdlndEmld
IpsMarybHBay
RocknLgn
InnsfBeaud
KroyCap
MtIsaBilo
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
54
13.3 Advised when to resume usual activities Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff tell you when (you / your child) could resume (your / their) usual activities?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
5862616161
73
7574
7272
6267
6566646464
596467
6165
5964
596263
5962
5860595858
5558
575657
5448
111114
1010
9
107
96
2211
139
111110198
125
166
1676
137
1510111312178
12128
99
322725
3029
18
151919
2215
2222
26252525
2128
3126
3025
3026
303128
3227
3030293028
333232
3637
43
4,6014,681
8142,0651,480
322
16916315312510514314315312511913611713712512010992
161108128147144111139135167121146109148131159131143119
(73)(45)(16)(15)(10)
(4)
(3)(2)(1)(1)(1)(0)(2)(1)(2)(3)(1)(2)(2)(1)(0)(3)(3)(0)(0)(1)(3)(2)(0)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(2)(0)(0)(2)(1)(1)(0)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHRmaMCH
TmbaNmbrWckMky
MtIsaRBWH
CrnsMaryb
PAHRobCapKroyInnsf
TPCHQEIIBiloCabTTH
EmldIps
LgnRockn
MAHBund
GdstnGCHGym
CalRdlndRdclf
BeaudHBay
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
55
13.4 Advised about danger signs of illness/treatment Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Did a member of staff tell you about what danger signs regarding (your / your child's) illness or treatment to watch for after you went home?
The results for Queensland were significantly more favourable in 2013 than in 2011.
576364
5960
80
8279
7072
696668
65666566
63636261
596162
586062
59595959
565559
5555
5357
5152
49
1514
151414
11
1310
149
10161217141613171617
1418131218139
1314
121218181118
161911
2012
17
282321
2626
9
511
1619
2118
21192019
22202121
2523
262623
27292727
29292626
3027
2928
3229
3534
5,0715,300
9312,2941,678
397
202195144170158132142150154129115126128150124132148157166145138154149158168158148171164167153173152136144
(84)(75)(16)(36)(16)
(7)
(4)(3)(2)(2)(1)(1)(3)(1)(2)(3)(2)(3)(3)(2)(1)(0)(3)(2)(4)(3)(5)(3)(4)(0)(0)(3)(3)(2)(1)(2)(0)(2)(1)(2)(2)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCH
RBWHRmaEmldGCHBund
CalRobPAHBilo
TPCHCrns
TmbaNmbr
IpsTTHWck
MarybRocknRdclfMkyCabCap
MtIsaQEII
GdstnMAH
RdlndLgn
BeaudGymKroy
HBayInnsf
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
56
13.5 Advised who to contact if concerned about condition/treatment
Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about (your / your child's) condition or treatment after you left the Emergency Department?
7373
7771
6881
8281808079
7777777676757474747373737372717171707069696767676666656363
57
2727
2329
3219
1819202021
2323232424252626262727272728292929303031313333333434353737
43
6,7467,7091,3433,2932,598
475
245230170189201189246193185217213196224214202263228180244238237242195230212215253253217220229241246210242
(236)(190)(38)(86)(47)(19)
(7)(12)(11)
(7)(6)(2)(7)
(13)(3)(6)(3)(6)(6)(2)(5)(2)(4)(4)(2)(5)(8)(2)(4)(2)(4)(7)(8)(3)(7)(2)(7)(7)(4)(8)(4)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHMCHGCHPAH
RBWHTPCHMaryb
RobNmbr
CabTTHCrnsMky
TmbaBundRma
CalIps
EmldMtIsaMAHQEIIBilo
KroyRockn
InnsfGymCapLgn
RdclfGdstnRdlnd
WckHBay
BeaudPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
57
14 Leaving the Emergency Department - Coordination of follow-up services
Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked:
1. Were adequate arrangements made by the hospital for any services (you / your child) needed?
Note that the question in this topic was not asked of respondents who were admitted to a ward or transferred to another hospital.
58
14.1 Arrangements for services Patients who were/whose child was discharged from the Emergency Department were asked: Were adequate arrangements made by the hospital for any services (you / your child) needed?
Not asked in 201160
6457
6066
8379
7467666968
6667
5859
6462
65586059
6362
57575961
5556
6051
5055
5254
4751
4648
1412
1414
16
89
16159
7119
242311
146
21151679
1817
128
15146
2225
131714
221320
9
2624
2826
17
1512
1717
1923
2523
241719
2525
2921
2525
2929
2526
30313031
352726
3231
3331
3733
43
1,970352890607121
5858627366426258424363594752624763516364485556534249555559596155667250
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
RCHTmbaEmldWckGCH
TPCHGym
RBWHTTHBilo
MCHMkyPAH
MtIsaQEIIInnsfRma
MarybRob
RdlndGdstnNmbr
CabHBayCrnsCap
BundBeaud
LgnIps
RocknKroyMAHRdclf
CalPercentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
59
15 Leaving the Emergency Department - Destination Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked:
1. Where did (you / your child) go at the end of (your / your child's) time in the Emergency Department?
60
15.1 Destination after leaving the Emergency Department All patients or parents/guardians of patients were asked: Where did (you / your child) go at the end of (your / your child's) time in the Emergency Department?
2625
3323
1420
3035353534
2831
272121
3524
234
2510
1925
1329
2430
1615
98
1419
1025
1716
14
2217
46
4
5
565
11
55
7
54
119
44
58
74
7272
6573
8079
6662626364
6768
677274
6174
7485
7288
7973
8166
6969
798080
8381
7685
6676
7983
7882
9,18910,612
2,1314,5573,313
611
306296303309307304306
305307310308297309305306275308305305304306307
308249305306301305305308307314305
306305
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
CrnsGCHNmbrPAH
RBWHTPCH
TTH
BundCab
HBayIps
LgnMAH
MarybMky
MtIsaQEII
RdclfRdlnd
RobRocknTmba
BeaudBiloCal
CapEmld
GdstnGymInnsfKroyRmaWck
MCHRCH
Percentage (%)
Hos
pita
ls o
rder
ed b
y pe
er g
roup
Admitted to a ward in the same hospital
Transferred to a different hospital
Went home
Went to stay with a friend or relative
Other
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals
Large Hospitals
Medium and Small Hospitals
Children's Hospitals
61
16 Complaints Patients aged 16 years or more, and parents/guardians of patients aged less than 16 years, were asked:
1. whether they saw or received any information in the Emergency Department about how to give feedback about the care they received.
62
16.1 Information on how to provide feedback All patients and parents/guardians of patients were asked whether they saw or received any information in the Emergency Department about how to give feedback about the care they received.
Not asked in 20111514151716
3325
22212120201918171717171717161615151514141414141312121212111010108
8586858384
6775
7879798080818283838383838384848585858686868686878888888889909090
92
9,9331,9824,2703,131
550
240287295286289280277285263289286291286300276291274292291278293287288283289281288283283283280286284278291
(689)(152)(294)(183)(60)
(9)(17)(19)(20)(16)(28)(28)(18)(12)(16)(18)(19)(20)
(8)(29)(19)(31)(16)(19)(26)(13)(18)(18)(22)(18)(27)(21)(13)(26)(22)(25)(20)(14)(28)(16)
Qld 2011Qld 2013
PR&SLge
M & SChild
BiloMaryb
RmaTTHGymQEIICal
EmldMtIsaWckRob
MAHBund
BeaudMCHHBayRCHCab
TmbaNmbr
CapRdclfMky
RdlndKroy
RBWHPAHGCH
IpsGdstnTPCH
CrnsLgn
RocknInnsf
Percentage (%)
►M
ore
favo
urab
le►
Yes No
State and peer groups
Individual hospitals
Patients Responding
(Don't know)
63
Appendix A: General information
A.1 Survey objectives The objectives of the Emergency Department Patient Experience Survey 2013 were to:
• provide estimates of overall patient satisfaction at a statewide and health facility level
• provide estimates of patient satisfaction across components of Emergency Department care
• provide hospitals with data which can be used to measure and improve the delivery of Emergency Department services
• allow comparison with 2011 results.
A.2 Methodology This section provides summary details of survey methodology, operational outcomes, and derivation of estimates. A more detailed description is available in the Survey Review.
A.2.1 Questionnaire design The 2013 survey questionnaire was based on the 2011 questionnaire, which in turn was based on the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department Question Bank 2009 (© Care Quality Commission, UK), with some questions added, modified or removed.
The survey instrument and additional questions were developed by Queensland Health in conjunction with the Government Statistician's office to meet the specific objectives of the survey and the mode of administration.
A small number of new questions from the national set of core, common patient experience questions recently endorsed by the National Health Information Standards and Statistics Committee were included.
A.2.2 Scope Patients who visited Emergency Departments in Queensland's public hospitals between 1 May and 30 June 2013 were randomly selected on a monthly basis from the hospitals' Emergency Department information systems (EDIS and EDIS-Rural) to participate in the survey. In order for the patient to be considered in-scope, they needed to satisfy the following criteria:
• the patient attended an Emergency Department at one of the hospitals listed in Appendix B between 1 May 2013 and 30 June 2013
• the patient was discharged to their home or usual place of residence, or admitted to a hospital as an inpatient
• the patient was a resident of Australia.
Patients were excluded if it was determined they:
• did not wait for treatment
• left after treatment had commenced
• were admitted to a mental health unit or ward
• were discharged to a nursing home or institution
64
• were transferred to another health care facility, other than a hospital
• were deceased in the Emergency Department or subsequently
• presented for a mental health issue (except drug or alcohol related)
• presented with self-harm
• were in a known or suspected domestic violence situation
• had a miscarriage, stillbirth, live birth where the neonate subsequently died before discharge, intrauterine death, hydatidiform mole, or complications following miscarriage or termination
• had requested an interpreter in the hospital
• usually resided outside Australia
• had refused consent to be contacted to provide feedback
• had been contacted as part of the Press Ganey Survey conducted by the Mater Hospitals
• were 16 years of age or older if they were a patient in one of the Children's Hospitals
• were under 16 years of age if they were a patient in any of the other hospitals.
Responses for patients under the age of 16 were provided by their parent or guardian, or by the adult who accompanied them at the Emergency Department.
A.2.3 Sampling The total sample size for each hospital was calculated to provide a 95% confidence interval achieving a margin of error up to 6 percentage points either side of a point prevalence estimate of 60%.
Two months of patient data were used with the sample drawn each month as the data became available. For health facilities where the expected number of in-scope patients was less than the number of patients needed to achieve the required level of precision or where the number of patients was only marginally higher, a census was attempted of all in-scope patients.
A total of 17,784 patients were selected to participate in the survey across the two months of interviewing. A breakdown of the response rate for each month is contained in Table 1.
A.2.4 Peer groups The 35 public hospitals included in the survey were classified by Queensland Health into four mutually exclusive hospital peer groups:
• Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals (PR & S - 7)
• Large Hospitals (Lge - 15)
• Medium and Small Hospitals (M & S - 11)
• Children's Hospitals (Child - 2).
For a list of hospitals in each peer group please refer to Appendix B.
65
A.2.5 Pre-approach letter and data collection A pre-approach letter was sent to all selected patients informing them of their selection in the survey and advising them that they could expect to receive a phone call in the following weeks. The letter also provided:
• details of the Emergency Department admission for which they had been selected
• an assurance of confidentiality, as the information would be collected under the Statistical Returns Act (1896)
• contact phone numbers where they could receive further information about the survey or change their contact details.
A.2.6 Response rate The response rate is the number of interviews that can be used in the analysis as a percentage of all possible interviews that could have been achieved, had every in-scope person responded. This means that patients who were considered out-of-scope on the frame (e.g. deceased or unconscious) were excluded from this calculation. For a more detailed description of the calculation of the response rates, please refer to the Survey Review.
A total of 10,626 interviews were achieved across the two months of interviewing, with an overall response rate of 60%. Table 1: Breakdown of responses by month of visit
Month May 2013 June 2013 Overall
Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals
1,024 62 1,110 56 2,134 59
Large Hospitals 2,425 63 2,140 58 4,565 61
Medium and Small Hospitals 1,674 60 1,642 55 3,316 58
Children's Hospitals 329 77 282 65 611 71
All surveyed hospitals 5,452 62 5,174 57 10,626 60
The survey results have been calibrated to the Emergency Department population characteristics, potentially removing non-response bias that might be present in the raw data.
66
A.2.7 Sample characteristics and weighting Weighting and benchmarking was applied to adjust for non-response in the sample and to standardise the results for each hospital.
Generalised regression weighting was used to calibrate the weight applied to each response during estimation to sum to the following marginal totals of patients:
• hospital
• age by hospital type (Children's Hospitals vs other hospitals)
• sex
• whether respondent had multiple contact numbers or not
• triage score (1 vs 2, 3, 4 or 5).
Estimates were then standardised by recalibrating the weights to standard population totals for hospital by age by sex. The standard population totals were calculated by apportioning the patient totals for each hospital according to the statewide proportion across all hospitals on the frame. To ensure comparability between 2011 and 2013 estimates, the 2011 data was restandardised to the 2013 population proportions. As a result, estimates for the 2011 survey may be slightly different from those published in the 2011 survey reports.
Table 2 shows the profile of respondents comparing the proportions of original responses to the proportions after the process of weighting and benchmarking had been applied. For full details on the weighting and benchmarking process, see the Survey Review. Table 2: Sample characteristics
State Public Hospitals
Original (%) Benchmarked (%)
Triage category
Triage score 1 0.3 0.8
Triage scores 2, 3, 4 and 5 99.7 99.2
Gender
Male 49.4 50.4
Female 50.6 49.6
Age
Under 2 1.6 2.4
2 - 15 4.1 5.1
16 - 35 31.8 35.7
36 - 55 29.2 26.1
56 and over 33.3 30.7
Percentages in this table may not add to 100% due to rounding.
67
A.3 Data analysis and presentation
A.3.1 Graphs Results for each measure of patient experience or satisfaction are presented graphically in Sections 3 to 16. Apart from graph 11.2, they are set out as described below.
Layout Top section
The top section of each graph shows the aggregated statewide results for 2011 and 2013, then the results for each of the peer groups.
Bottom section
The bottom section of the graph shows the results for each hospital ranked by their performance according to the most favourable categories, with the highest performing hospitals at the top. See Appendix D for more details of how hospitals were ranked for each graph.
In the case of neutral measures (those without a favourable-unfavourable interpretation), hospitals are ordered by peer group, and alphabetically within peer group.
Colour schemes
The coloured sections of the bars indicate the percentages of patients who gave various responses. They are interpreted according to the legend at the top of the graph.
The bar representing the 2013 Queensland results has been highlighted in each graph by using darker versions of the colours shown in the legend.
The rounded percentage is printed on each bar where the percentage is greater than 3.5. Smaller percentages are generally not printed to prevent them from obscuring the bars.
Extra information
The total number of patients who responded with one of the categories presented in the graph is indicated to the right of the bar. This number represents the base used to calculate the percentages.
In general, patients who gave responses not reported in the graph, such as 'Don't know', have been excluded from the calculation of the percentage in each bar, unless otherwise stated in the legend. For some measures, particularly those involving the recall of information provided by Emergency Department staff, the number of respondents who answered 'Don't know' or 'Didn't need' is also provided in brackets after the number of respondents. Categories excluded from graphs generally represent small numbers and percentages of patients.
Tables of results for the key satisfaction question are also provided in Appendix E.
68
A.3.2 Output interpretation Rounding
Figures presented in this report are rounded to whole numbers. Rounding may cause the aggregation of categories to appear to sum to above or below 100%. Items that are less than 0.5% are rounded to zero. Items that are 99.5% or more are rounded to 100%.
Missing categories
Only the salient categories are presented in the graphs and tables. The categories that are typically not presented are 'Didn't need', 'Don't know / Can't remember' and 'Refused'. Where one or more of these categories represents a meaningful response they are included for reference.
A.3.3 Significance testing Significance testing was performed for each measure between the 2011 and 2013 estimates for Queensland. Significant differences have been reported for each question under the corresponding graph. If a significant difference is not reported no significant difference was found.
Note that differences and rankings reported in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 of the Executive Summary are not the result of statistical significance testing and so those results may or may not represent statistically significant differences or trends.
A.3.4 Cautionary note There are differences between the methodology used to collect and analyse data from Children's Hospitals and other hospitals. These differences include:
• the use of parents as proxy interviewees for child patients
• the use of the age category variable to standardise responses between hospitals, a variable mutually exclusively distributed between the two groups
• the exclusion of child patients who attended hospitals other than Children's Hospitals.
Consequently, caution should be taken when comparing results for Children's Hospitals and other hospitals.
69
Appendix B: Peer groups
The 35 public hospitals included in the survey were classified by Queensland Health into four mutually exclusive hospital peer groups:
• Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals (7)
• Large Hospitals (15)
• Medium and Small Hospitals (11)
• Children’s Hospitals (2).
The hospitals in each of the four peer groups are listed below.
Table 3: Hospitals in each peer group
PR & S Crns GCH Nmbr PAH TPCH RBWH TTH
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals Cairns Hospital Gold Coast Hospital Nambour General Hospital Princess Alexandra Hospital The Prince Charles Hospital The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital The Townsville Hospital
First surveyed 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011
Lge Bund Cab HBay Ips Lgn Mky Maryb MAH MtIsa QEII Rdclf Rdlnd Rob Rockn Tmba
Large Hospitals Bundaberg Hospital Caboolture Hospital Hervey Bay Hospital Ipswich Hospital Logan Hospital Mackay Base Hospital Maryborough Hospital Mater Adult Hospital Mount Isa Hospital Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital Redcliffe Hospital Redland Hospital Robina Hospital Rockhampton Hospital Toowoomba Health Service
First surveyed 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011
M & S Beaud Bilo Cal Cap Emld Gdstn Gym Innsf Kroy Rma Wck
Medium and Small Hospitals Beaudesert Hospital Biloela Hospital Caloundra Health Service Capricorn Coast Hospital and Health Service Emerald Hospital Gladstone Hospital Gympie Health Service Innisfail Hospital Kingaroy Hospital Roma Hospital Warwick Hospital
First surveyed 2011 2013 2011 2011 2013 2011 2011 2011 2013 2013 2013
Child MCH RCH
Children’s Hospitals Mater Children's Hospital Royal Children's Hospital
First surveyed 2011 2011
70
Appendix C: Definitions of favourable and unfavourable
For tests of significant differences in this report, response categories for each relevant question were collapsed into two categories, indicating favourable and unfavourable responses from patients. The following table summarises how this was done for each question.
Table 4: Definitions of favourable and unfavourable responses
Section Question topic Favourable Unfavourable Excluded 3 Rating of care
received (overall satisfaction)
Excellent Very good
Good Fair Poor Very poor
Don’t know Refused
4.1 Main reason for attending Emergency Department2
n.a. n.a. n.a.
4.2 Patient recall of triage process2
Yes Don't know No I did not discuss my
condition with a triage nurse
Refused
4.3 Sufficient privacy at triage
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
Did not discuss condition
Don’t know Refused
4.4 Courtesy of Emergency Department receptionist
Excellent Very good
Good Fair Poor Very poor
Did not see receptionist
Don’t know Refused
5.1 Length of time waited before being examined by a doctor or nurse2
n.a. n.a. n.a.
5.2 Told expected wait time to be examined
Yes Information
shown on a (TV) screen
No Don’t know Refused
5.3 Told reason for wait to be examined2
Yes Information
shown on a (TV) screen
No Don’t know Refused
5.4 Patients ever worried they had been forgotten
No Yes Don’t know Refused
2 These questions were not considered for inclusion in the lists of top five areas of most and least favourable patient experience in the Executive summary.
71
Section Question topic Favourable Unfavourable Excluded 6.1 Condition and
treatment explained in a way patients understood
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
Did not need Don’t know Refused
6.2 Doctors and nurses listened to patients
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Don’t know Refused
6.3 Doctor or nurse discussed patients' worries/fears about conditions or treatments
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
Did not ask Don’t know Refused
6.4 Confidence and trust in doctors and nurses
All of them Most of them
Only some of them None of them
Don’t know Refused
6.5 Doctors and nurses talked in front of patients as if not there
No Yes, to some extent
Yes, definitely
Don’t know Refused
7.1 Treated with respect and dignity
Yes, all of the time
Yes, some of the time
No
Don’t know Refused
7.2 Treated with kindness and understanding
Yes, all of the time
Yes, some of the time
No
Don’t know Refused
7.3 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided
The right amount Too much
Not enough I wasn’t given any
information about my condition or treatment
Don’t know Refused
7.4 Understandable answers to patients' questions
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Don’t know Refused
7.5 Reasons patients did not ask questions about care and treatment3
Did not have any questions
Too unwell to ask any questions
Did not have an opportunity to ask questions
There wasn't enough time to ask questions
Other reason Don’t know Refused
7.6 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided to family, carer, someone else
The right amount Too much
Not enough No family, carer or friends were involved
They didn't want or need information
I didn't want them to have any information
Don’t know Refused
7.7 Sufficient privacy during examination or treatment
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Don’t know Refused
3 These questions were not considered for inclusion in the lists of top five areas of most and least favourable patient experience in the Executive summary.
72
Section Question topic Favourable Unfavourable Excluded 7.8 Assistance from staff
when needed Yes, always A member of
staff was with me all the time
Yes, sometimes No, I could not find
a member of staff to help me
Did not need Don’t know Refused
7.9 Conflicting information provided by staff
No Yes, definitely Yes, to some
extent
Don’t know Refused
7.10 Involved as much as desired in decisions about care and treatment
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Not well enough
Don’t know Refused
7.11 How many staff introduced themselves
All of them Some of them
Very few of them None of the staff
introduced themselves
Don’t know Refused
8.1 Reason for tests explained in understandable way
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
Don’t know Refused
8.2 Test results explained in understandable way
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Don’t know Refused
9.1 In pain4 n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.2 Everything possible done
to control pain Yes, definitely Yes, to some
extent No
Don’t know Refused
10.1 Cleanliness of Emergency Department
Very clean Fairly clean
Not very clean Not at all clean
Don’t know Refused
10.2 Cleanliness of toilets Very clean Fairly clean
Not very clean Not at all clean
Did not use Don’t know Refused
10.3 Availability of food and drink
Yes No I was told not to eat or drink
I didn’t know if I was allowed to eat or drink
I did not want anything to eat or drink
Don’t know Refused
10.4 Patients feeling bothered or threatened by patients/visitors
No Yes, to some extent
Yes, definitely
Don’t know Refused
11.1 Patients delayed leaving Emergency Department
Not delayed Delayed Don’t know Refused
4 These questions were not considered for inclusion in the lists of top five areas of most and least favourable patient experience in the Executive summary.
73
Section Question topic Favourable Unfavourable Excluded 11.2 Reasons for delay in
leaving Emergency Department5
n.a. n.a. n.a.
12.1 How to take new medications explained
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No I did not need an
explanation
Don’t know Refused
12.2 Purpose of new medications explained
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No I did not need an
explanation
Don’t know Refused
12.3 Told about side effects of new medications
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No I did not need this
type of information
Don’t know Refused
13.1 Given enough information about how to manage care at home
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
I did not need this type of information
Don’t know Refused
13.2 Given written/printed information about condition or treatment
Yes No Did not need Don’t know Refused
13.3 Advised when to resume usual activities
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent
No
Did not need Don’t know Refused
13.4 Advised about danger signs of illness/treatment
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
Did not need Don’t know Refused
13.5 Advised who to contact if concerned about condition/treatment
Yes No Don’t know Refused
14.1 Arrangements for services Yes, completely Yes, to some extent
No
Did not need Don’t know Refused
15.1 Destination after leaving Emergency Department5
n.a. n.a. n.a.
16.1 Information on how to provide feedback
Yes No Don’t know Refused
5 These questions were not considered for inclusion in the lists of top five areas of most and least favourable patient experience in the Executive summary.
74
Appendix D: Methodology used to rank hospitals for each graph
In most of the graphs in this report, hospitals are ranked according to favourability of the responses, from highest to lowest. This ranking was performed by calculating a weighted sum of the percentage in each category for each hospital. Hospitals were then sorted by this weighted sum.
A function of multiple categories was used to try to ensure that all favourable categories were used in determining rank, with the most favourable categories given more weight.
The weights used for each graph are given in the table below.
Table 5: Weights used in sorting hospitals for each graph
Section Graph Title Weights Categories 3 Rating of care
received (overall satisfaction)
100806040200
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor
4.1 Main reason for attending Emergency Department
n.a. n.a.
4.2 Patient recall of triage process
10050250
Yes Don't know No I did not discuss my condition with a triage
nurse 4.3 Sufficient privacy at
triage 100
500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
4.4 Courtesy of Emergency Department receptionist
100806040200
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor
5.1 Length of time waited before being examined by a doctor or nurse
100806040200
10 minutes or less 11 - 30 minutes 31 - 60 minutes 61 minutes - 2 hours More than 2 hours - 4 hours More than 4 hours
5.2 Told expected wait time to be examined
100500
Yes Information shown on a (TV) screen No
75
Section Graph Title Weights Categories 5.3 Told reason for wait to
be examined 100
500
Yes Information shown on a (TV) screen No
5.4 Patients ever worried they had been forgotten
1000
No Yes
6.1 Condition and treatment explained in a way patients understood
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
6.2 Doctors and nurses listened to patients
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
6.3 Doctor or nurse discussed patients' worries/fears about conditions or treatments
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
6.4 Confidence and trust in doctors and nurses
10075250
All of them Most of them Only some of them None of them
6.5 Doctors and nurses talked in front of patients as if not there
100500
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
7.1 Treated with respect and dignity
100500
Yes, all of the time Yes, some of the time No
7.2 Treated with kindness and understanding
100500
Yes, all of the time Yes, some of the time No
7.3 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided
10066.733.3
0
The right amount Too much Not enough I was not given any information about my
condition or treatment 7.4 Understandable
answers to patients' questions
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
7.5 Reasons patients did not ask questions about care and treatment
100100
00
Did not have any questions Too unwell to ask any questions Did not have an opportunity to ask questions There wasn't enough time to ask questions
7.6 Amount of information about condition or treatment provided to family, carer, someone else
100500
The right amount Too much Not enough
7.7 Sufficient privacy during examination or treatment
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
7.8 Assistance from staff when needed
100
500
Yes, always / A member of staff was with me all the time
Yes, sometimes No, I could not find a member of staff to help
me
76
Section Graph Title Weights Categories 7.9 Conflicting information
provided by staff 100
500
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
7.10 Involved as much as desired in decisions about care and treatment
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
7.11 How many staff introduced themselves
10075250
All of them Some of them Very few of them None of the staff introduced themselves
8.1 Reason for tests explained in understandable way
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
8.2 Test results explained in understandable way
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
9.1 In pain n.a. n.a. 9.2 Everything possible
done to control pain 100
500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
10.1 Cleanliness of Emergency Department
10075250
Very clean Fairly clean Not very clean Not at all clean
10.2 Cleanliness of toilets 10075250
Very clean Fairly clean Not very clean Not at all clean
10.3 Availability of food and drink
1000
Yes No
10.4 Patients feeling bothered or threatened by patients/visitors
100500
No Yes, to some extent Yes, definitely
11.1 Patients delayed leaving Emergency Department
1000
Not delayed Delayed
11.2 Reasons for delay in leaving Emergency Department
n.a. n.a.
12.1 How to take new medications explained
1005000
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No I did not need an explanation
77
Section Graph Title Weights Categories 12.2 Purpose of new
medications explained 100
5000
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No I did not need an explanation
12.3 Told about side effects of new medications
1005000
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No I did not need this type of information
13.1 Given enough information about how to manage care at home
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
13.2 Given written/printed information about condition or treatment
1000
Yes No
13.3 Advised when to resume usual activities
100500
Yes, definitely Yes, to some extent No
13.4 Advised about danger signs of illness/treatment
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
13.5 Advised who to contact if concerned about condition/treatment
1000
Yes No
14.1 Arrangements for services
100500
Yes, completely Yes, to some extent No
15.1 Destination after leaving Emergency Department
n.a. n.a.
16.1 Information on how to provide feedback
1000
Yes No
78
Appendix E: Hospital results The tables within this section outline a few key details for each hospital involved in the survey. These include the number of interviews achieved, the response rate and responses to the overall rating of care question: ‘Overall, how would you rate the care you (child) received in the Emergency Department?’ for 2011 and 2013. Analysis has been performed on the latter results to present statistically significant differences at the state and peer level. All analysis has been performed on the unrounded estimates and hospitals have been ordered alphabetically within each peer group.
In this appendix significance testing was undertaken on the estimated proportions at the 95% significance level adjusted for multiple comparisons. Testing at the 95% level of confidence means any differences reported are either true differences, or the product of randomly extreme data that has less than a 5% chance of happening. For example, at the 95% significance level, we would expect 1 in 20 tests to incorrectly show a significant difference due to chance alone, adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Significance testing was performed on non-overlapping groups. Testing between the hospital and the peer group or state was performed excluding the hospital from the peer group or state results. Non-overlapping groups fulfil the statistical assumption of independence. Testing results of non-overlapping groups may also improve the likelihood for the detection of differences between the results tested.
79
The following notation has been used for annotating comparisons and items of note in the tables below and throughout this section. Note that symbols have only been applied to the 2013 results as these are the focus of this report.
Table 6: Key to symbols in tables of estimates
Symbol Interpretation
# Statistically significant difference between hospital and state results
$ Statistically significant difference between hospital and peer group results
~ Statistically significant difference between 2013 and 2011 results
^ Highest result in peer group
v Lowest result in peer group
* Confidence interval width between 10 and 30 percentage points
** Confidence interval width greater than 30 percentage points
80
Table 7: Key results for Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals
Hospital Name Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2013
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2011
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
State public hospitals 10,626 60 74 23 4 77 19 3
Principal Referral and Specialised Hospitals 2,134 59 75 22 3 78 18 3
TPCH 305 63 76 21 3 79 18 3 PAH 309 59 80* 17#v 3 78 19 3 Nmbr 304 59 77* 21* 2 82 17 0 GCH 296 57 69v* 26~^* 5^ 78 15 7 TTH 306 60 72* 25* 4 79 18 3 RBWH 308 61 81^* 18* 2v 77 21 2 Crns 306 54 74* 24* 2 76 21 3
81
Table 8: Key results for Large Hospitals
Hospital Name Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2013
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2011
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
State public hospitals 10,626 60 74 23 4 77 19 3
Large Hospitals 4,565 61 72 25 4 77 20 3 MAH 310 61 75* 22* 3 82 17 2 Ips 309 66 68* 29* 2 71 25 4 Rdclf 305 61 68* 25* 7^ 76 22 2 QEII 308 61 74 23 3 73 23 5 Rdlnd 305 60 74 22 4 78 18 3 Lgn 298 61 64#$~v* 31#^* 5 75 22 3 Cab 308 63 71* 24* 5 77 19 5 Bund 306 59 75* 23* 2v 80 17 3 HBay 310 63 71* 25* 4 76 20 4 Maryb 305 62 79$^ 18v 3 77 20 3 Tmba 310 62 70* 26* 4 77 20 2 Rockn 306 59 67* 28* 5 77 20 3 Mky 306 61 77* 21* 2 78 20 2 MtIsa 275 50 67* 27* 5 75 21 4 Rob 304 60 78* 19* 3 81 16 3
82
Table 9: Key results for Medium and Small Hospitals
Hospital Name Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2013
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2011
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
State public hospitals 10,626 60 74 23 4 77 19 3
Medium and Small Hospitals 3,316 58 71 25 4 76 21 4
Beaud 308 60 70* 25* 5 74 21 5 Cal 305 64 76 22 2v 75 23 3 Gym 306 62 73* 23* 3 75 22 3 Kroy 307 52 64#v* 29* 7#^ n.a. n.a. n.a. Wck 305 56 69* 27* 4 n.a. n.a. n.a. Rma 314 57 79$^* 18v* 3 n.a. n.a. n.a. Bilo 249 54 67* 30^* 3 n.a. n.a. n.a. Emld 303 61 77* 19* 4 n.a. n.a. n.a. Gdstn 305 58 64#~* 29#~* 6 77 18 5 Cap 306 57 70~* 24* 7 81 15 4 Innsf 308 56 67* 27* 5 72 25 4
83
Table 10: Key results for Children's Hospitals
Hospital Name Interviews Achieved
Response Rate (%)
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2013
Rating of care received (overall satisfaction) 2011
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
Excellent / Very good (%)
Good / Fair (%)
Poor / Very poor (%)
State public hospitals 10,626 60 74 23 4 77 19 3
Children's Hospitals 611 71 83 15 2 82 16 2
MCH 306 67 81v* 16^ 3^ 80 16 4
RCH 305 75 88#^ 11#v 1v 84 16 1
84
Appendix F: Adult Questionnaire
Emergency Department Patient Experience Survey 2013
Hello: Hello, this is ... calling from the Government Statistician’s office. We are conducting an interview about perceptions of public hospitals on behalf of the Department of Health. _______________________________________________________________________________
Intro1: Could I please speak to [respondent’s name]? 1 Speaking to respondent 2 Contact will get respondent 3 No – Not here right now End survey 4 No – Away for extended period End survey 5 Refused End survey _______________________________________________________________________________
Intro2: We are interviewing people who were patients at Public Hospital Emergency Departments recently about their perceptions of the care they received.
You may remember receiving a letter to tell you we would call you regarding your experiences while you were at the Emergency Department at [hospital] on [date].
The information you provide will help the Department of Health improve public hospital services. The interview will only take around 12 minutes of your time. Your responses are strictly confidential and no identifying information can be released to the Department of Health or any other body.
Can we start now? 1 Yes Go to Q1 2 No – arrange call back End survey 3 Refused End survey _______________________________________________________________________________
GH1: In general, would you say your health is - 1 Excellent 2 Very good 3 Good 4 Fair 5 Poor 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q1: Before we begin, can I just check that you were conscious for all or most of your time in the Emergency Department?
1 Yes 2 Yes – conscious but can’t remember details 3 No 98 Don’t know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q1 = 1 go to Q3Int; Otherwise End survey _______________________________________________________________________________
Q3Int: Some calls are monitored by my supervisor for training and quality purposes. _______________________________________________________________________________
85
Q3: At the end of your time in the Emergency Department, were you - ? 1 Admitted to a ward in the same hospital 2 Transferred to a different hospital 3 Did you go home 4 Go to stay with a friend or relative 5 Other (specify) 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q3 = 1 or 2 go to Text1; Otherwise go to Text2 _______________________________________________________________________________
Text1: The Department of Health undertakes a range of patient experience surveys. This survey focuses on the care of patients in the Emergency Department.
The majority of questions will be about JUST your stay while in the Emergency Department.
However, I will provide an opportunity for you at the end of the survey, to give your feedback on the care you received in the ward. _______________________________________________________________________________
Text2: Now I'd like to ask you about your overall impressions of your visit to the Emergency Department.
_______________________________________________________________________________
QS3: Overall, how would you rate the care you received in the Emergency Department? Would you say it was -
1 Excellent 2 Very good 3 Good 4 Fair 5 Poor 6 Very poor 98 Don't know
99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
QS2: Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the Emergency Department? The options are –
1 Yes, all of the time 2 Yes, some of the time 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
QS7: Overall, were you treated with kindness and understanding while you were in the Emergency Department? Would you say - ?
1 Yes, all of the time 2 Yes, some of the time 3 No 98 Don't Know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
86
QS5: Was the MAIN reason that you went to the Emergency Department because….? (READ OUT. ONE ANSWER ONLY)
1 You were told to go by the 13HEALTH hotline service 2 You were told to go by another health professional 3 You were taken to the Emergency Department by the Ambulance 4 It was free 5 Your doctor was not available 6 You were not aware of any other service available at the time 7 You wanted a second opinion 8 You decided that you needed to go to an Emergency Department 9 Somebody else decided that you needed to go to an Emergency Department 10 Or some other reason 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q9a: The triage process is where a nurse assesses the patient's condition and prioritises them according to how urgent they are. Do you remember taking part in the triage process?
1 Yes 2 No 3 I did not discuss my condition with a triage nurse 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q9a = 1 go to Q9b; Otherwise go to Q10 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q9b: Were you given enough privacy when discussing your condition with the triage nurse? Would you say …
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not discuss my condition with a triage nurse 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q10: How would you rate the courtesy of the Emergency Department RECEPTIONIST? Would you say it was -
1 Excellent 2 Very good 3 Good 4 Fair 5 Poor 6 Very poor 7 I did not see a receptionist 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
87
Q14Int Next are some questions about waiting while in the Emergency Department. _______________________________________________________________________________
Q14: From the time you first arrived at the Emergency Department, how long did you wait BEFORE BEING EXAMINED by a doctor or nurse? (READ OUT ONLY IF NECESSARY.)
1 Did not have to wait 2 Up to 10 minutes 3 11 - 30 minutes 4 31 - 60 minutes 5 61 minutes - 2 hours 6 More than 2 hours - 3 hours 7 More than 3 hours - 4 hours 8 More than 4 hours 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q14 = 1 go to Q22; Otherwise go to Q15 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q15: Were you told how long you might have to WAIT TO BE EXAMINED? 1 Yes 2 Information shown on a (TV) screen 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q17: Were you told WHY YOU HAD TO WAIT to be examined? 1 Yes 2 Information shown on a (TV) screen 3 No 98 Don't know/can't remember 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q22: At any point, did you ever feel worried that staff in the Emergency Department had forgotten about you?
1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q25Int: The next group of questions is about the doctors and nurses. _______________________________________________________________________________
Q25: While you were in the Emergency Department, did a doctor or nurse explain your condition and treatment in a way you could understand? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need an explanation 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
88
Q26: Did the doctors and nurses listen to what you had to say? Would you say - 1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q27: Did you have any worries or fears about your condition or treatment? 1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q27 = 1 go to Q28; Otherwise go to Q29 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q28: Did a doctor or nurse discuss these worries or fears with you? Would you say - 1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not attempt to discuss any worries/fears with doctor/nurse 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q29: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses examining and treating you? Would you say you had confidence and trust in -
1 All of them 2 Most of them 3 Only some of them 4 None of them 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q31: Sometimes doctors and nurses might talk in front of a patient as if they weren't there. Did this happen to you? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q33Int: Now I have some questions about your care and treatment. Again, this just relates to the Emergency Dept.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Q33: While you were in the Emergency Department, how much information about your condition or treatment was given to you? Would you say -
1 Not enough 2 The right amount 3 Too much 4 I wasn't given any information about my condition or treatment 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
89
Q34: Did you ask questions about your care and treatment? 1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q34 = 1 go to Q35; If Q34 = 2 go to Q36; Otherwise go to NAT3 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q35: Did you get answers that you could understand? Would you say - 1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Go to NAT3 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q36: Was this because you didn't have any questions, or for some other reason? 1 Did not have any questions 2 Too unwell to ask any questions 3 Did not have an opportunity to ask questions 4 There wasn't enough time to ask questions 5 Other reason (please specify) 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
This question is not included in the Child questionnaire.
NAT3: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to your family, carer or someone close to you? Would you say -
1 Not enough 2 The right amount 3 Too much 4 No family, carer or friends were involved
5 They didn't want or need information 6 I didn't want them to have any information
98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q38: Were you given enough privacy WHEN BEING EXAMINED OR TREATED? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
90
Q39: If YOU needed attention were you able to get a member of staff to help you? Would you say -
1 Yes, always 2 Yes, sometimes 3 No, I could not find a member of staff to help me 4 A member of staff was with me all the time 5 I did not need attention 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q40: Sometimes in a hospital, a member of staff may say one thing and another may say something quite different. Did this happen to you in the Emergency Department? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q41: Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in decisions about your care and treatment? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I was not well enough to be involved in decisions about my care 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q42: How many of the staff treating and assessing you introduced themselves? Was it - 1 All of them 2 Some of them 3 Very few of them 4 None of the staff introduced themselves 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q43Int: The next few questions are about tests you may have had. This is still just in relation to your care in the Emergency Dept.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Q43: Did you have any tests, such as x-rays, scans or blood tests, when you visited the Emergency Department?
1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q43 = 1 go to Q44; Otherwise go to Q47Int _______________________________________________________________________________
91
Q44: Did a member of staff explain WHY YOU NEEDED these tests in a way you could understand? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q45: Before you left the Emergency Department, were you TOLD the results of ANY of your tests?
1 Yes 2 No 3 ONLY given results in a sealed envelope for doctor 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q45 = 1 go to Q46; Otherwise go to Q47Int _______________________________________________________________________________
Q46: Did a member of staff EXPLAIN THE RESULTS of the tests in a way you could understand? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q47Int: Now I have a couple of questions about pain management. _______________________________________________________________________________
Q47: Were you in any pain while you were in the Emergency Department? 1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q47 = 1 go to Q50; Otherwise go to Q51Int _______________________________________________________________________________
Q50: Do you think the Emergency Department staff did everything they could to help control your pain? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
92
Q51Int: The next section is about the Emergency Department environment and facilities. _______________________________________________________________________________
Q51: In your opinion, how clean was the Emergency Department? Was it - 1 Very clean 2 Fairly clean 3 Not very clean 4 Not at all clean 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q52: How clean were the TOILETS in the Emergency Department? Were they - 1 Very clean 2 Fairly clean 3 Not very clean 4 Not at all clean 5 I did not use a toilet 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q53: Were you able to get suitable food or drinks when you were in the Emergency Department? Would you say – (Interviewer: ‘Suitable’ means food or drink that you were able to consume.)
1 Yes 2 No 3 I was told not to eat or drink 4 I did not know if I was allowed to eat or drink 5 I did not want anything to eat or drink 98 Don't know 99 Refused For Child questionnaire Q53: Were you able to get suitable food or drinks for your child when you were in the
Emergency Department? Would you say –” (Interviewer: ‘Suitable’ means food or drink that your child was able to consume.)
1 Yes 2 No 3 He/She wasn’t allowed to eat or drink 4 I did not know if he/she was allowed to eat or drink 5 He/She did not want anything to eat or drink 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q54: While you were in the Emergency Dept, did you feel bothered or threatened by other patients or visitors? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q3 = 1 or 2 go to Q79c; Otherwise go to Q61Int _______________________________________________________________________________
93
Q61Int: Now some questions about leaving the Emergency Department. _______________________________________________________________________________
Q61: Once your medical care was finished and YOU were ready to leave the Emergency Department, were you delayed for any of the following –
1 Equipment or aids, such as crutches 2 Medications 3 Someone to discharge you, e.g. the doctor 4 Test results 5 Letter for your doctor 6 An ambulance or hospital transport 7 Other transport 8 Services after leaving hospital to be arranged, e.g. social services/follow up 9 Something else (please specify) 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
NAT4: Were you given enough information about how to manage your care at home? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need this type of information 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q64: Before you left the Emergency Dept., were any NEW medications prescribed for you? (INTERVIEWER: 'NEW' means medication R hasn't had before)
1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q64 = 1 go to Q65; Otherwise go to Q68 _______________________________________________________________________________
Q65: Did a member of staff explain to you HOW TO TAKE the new medications? Would you say - (INTERVIEWER: 'NEW' means medication R hasn't had before)
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need an explanation 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q66: Did a member of staff explain THE PURPOSE of the medications you were to take at home in a way you could understand? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need an explanation 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
94
Q67: Did a member of staff tell you about MEDICATION SIDE EFFECTS to watch for? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need this type of information 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q68: Before you left the Emergency Department, were you given any WRITTEN OR PRINTED INFORMATION about your condition or treatment? This may be a leaflet or brochure, but does not include a letter for your doctor. The options are -
1 Yes 2 No 3 I did not need this type of information 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q69: Did a member of staff tell you when you could RESUME YOUR USUAL ACTIVITIES, such as when to go back to work or drive a car? Would you say -
1 Yes, definitely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need this type of information 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q71: Did a member of staff tell you about what DANGER SIGNS regarding your illness or treatment to watch for after you went home? Would you say -
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need this type of information 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q72: Did hospital staff tell you WHO TO CONTACT if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left the Emergency Department?
1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
NAT5: Were adequate arrangements made by the hospital for any services you needed? Would you say - (INTERVIEWER: 'services' includes things like rehabilitation or community nurses)
1 Yes, completely 2 Yes, to some extent 3 No 4 I did not need any services 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
95
Q79c: Some patients might wish to give feedback such as compliments or complaints about the care they received. While you were in the Emergency Department, did you see or receive any information on how to do this?
1 Yes 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q80Int: As I mentioned earlier, the information we collect will help the Department of Health in improving Emergency Department services.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Q80: Was there anything particularly good about your visit to the Emergency Department that you haven't already mentioned?
1 Yes (please specify) 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
Q81: Was there anything about the Emergency Department that could have been improved, that you haven't already told me about?
1 Yes (please specify) 2 No 98 Don't know 99 Refused _______________________________________________________________________________
If Q3 = 1 go to Q82a; If Q3 = 2 go to Q82b; Otherwise go to end _______________________________________________________________________________
Q82a/b: Now, thinking about after you left the Emergency Department and went to a Ward. Was there anything about your time in the Ward that you think could have been improved? (ALLOW MORE THAN ONE - DON'T READ OUT)
1 Too noisy 2 Not enough staff 3 Sent home too soon 4 Signage/getting lost around hospital 5 Ward disorganised 6 Waiting time 7 Other (please specify) 8 No 9 Don't know 10 Refused 11 Communication 12 Food/meals 13 Dirty shower/toilet _______________________________________________________________________________
Thanks. That concludes the survey.
Your responses are strictly confidential. No personal information will be published or released. Your responses are protected by the Queensland Government's Statistical Returns Act, which means that penalties apply under the laws of Queensland for anyone who released your responses in a way which would identify you. Your responses will be combined with those of other participants to compile aggregate information.
Thank you very much for your assistance.