patching the safety net: private fundraising for clinic
TRANSCRIPT
Patching the Safety Net: Private Fundraising for Clinic Operators
Michael J. MontgomeryMontgomery Consulting, Inc., The Remington Group & Lawrence Technological University
Learning Objectives:Diversifying Your Funding1. How to avoid over-reliance on project funding from government,
foundations and corporations.
2. How to raise more significant funding from individual donors.
3. Understanding and using the motivations why people give and the three incentive systems driving giving (and volunteering).
4.
5. How to identify prospective donors and make “the ask.”
6. Sponsorship and other strategies for securing additional business community support.
7. Creating a fund raising plan / revising your current plan to incorporate new tools.
3
Starting Points Project grants and government contracts are likely to
remain the predominant form of funding.
No organization ever achieved financial sustainability through grants and contracts alone.
Have always needed flexible funds to fill gaps.
Increasingly, need funds to maintain continuity of effort, meet full cost of service provision or be competitive for some grants (meet “match requirements”).
Need to understand how we got here as a starting point for discussing how to proceed.
4
How America funded services for low income populations 1620 - 1933
Services for low income populations to some degree local government but mostly a PRIVATE matter.
Philanthropy was Individual and largely Major Gifts.
Frequently to/through ethnic or denominational charities.
Often related to personal & spouse volunteerism.
Board membership at agencies serving low income populations was prestigious, socially advantageous and business/career enhancing.
5
New Deal started cultural change in how America funded services for low income New Deal = start of significant federal spending
on services for low income populations.
Care of low income populations came to be seen as at least in part a public responsibility.
Some private philanthropies closed or ceased direct service provision.
Detroit’s McGregor Fund great example --origins in pre-Depression McGregor Institute (mission).
6
1960s War on Poverty accelerated change. Many grant opportunities for expanding services.
New agencies born & older evolved to benefit.
Service providers often also joined United Way – so, even much of their private money now came indirectly.
1960 – 1970 funding for services to low income shifted from traditional philanthropy to grants/contracts.
Redefined role of agency Board from mobilizing resources to representation of community interests.
Clearest expression: Equal Opportunity Act 1965 –”maximum feasibility participation.” HUGE impact FAR beyond legal requirement.
7
A Tale of Two BoardsTraditional Board: Affluent & Influential (“Power Elite,”
“Establishment,” & “the Ladies who Lunch”)
Give & Get in Substantial Ways
Oversight using upper/middle class values
Often prescriptive
Sometimes paternal/maternalistic
Potential to be socially and culturally insensitive
Great for fundraising, maybe less sofor other things.
Post-1965 Board: “Tri-partite” Community + Providers &
Officials + Private Sector
Private Sector = Biz, Labor, Education, Religion, etc
Modest Giving and almost no significant “Getting”
Oversight using political / provider / community values
Reflect community desires
Socially & culturally sensitive
Great for understanding community needs& sensitivity but LOUSY for fundraising!
8
Create a Realistic Fundraising Plan….Based on understanding of why people & groups give
Makes provision for fundraising (time & $) Initiates preparations for fundraising Organizes for increasing access & influence Builds contact, suspect & (ultimately) prospect base Make “case” for organization/projects IDs “value proposition” for different kinds of supporters Assures aggressive, effective and efficient solicitation
of prospects Provides for stewardship of gifts and eventual
solicitation of donors
9
Components of Fundraising Success for Groups Serving Low Income Populations
Continuity ofFundraising
Effort
Seen asGood Value
for Biz Supporters
Attractive to Clubs &
Congregations
Compelling to
Individual Supporters
LogicalInvestment forFoundations
Good Stewardship
Strong &“Connected”
Board
Fundraising Success
10
Incentives for Voluntary Action (Giving)** Derived from Clark & Wilson, Administrative Science Quarterly (1962).
Purposive – Sincere desire to accomplish purpose; seeking nothing else. (Grants, Broad-Based Giving/Mass Solicitation) This is where most groups serving low income populations operate!
Solidary – Be seen as part of desirable group. (Donor lists by level & “societies”) Arts and Education big on these.
Material – Expects somehow, sometime to become better off as a result of giving. (Sponsorship, Peer Solicitation) Major campaigns w/high level “cabinet” operate here.
Tap all three incentive systems and you will raise more money!!!
11
The Board Strong Board = “path” to Solidary and Material incentives
Primary conduit to flexible funds (unrestricted or effectively so)
Solidary: Strong Board = Desirable “club” with which prospective donor can be associated (gives to change how/by whom seen)
Material: One or more members of Strong Board are “business relevant” to prospective donor (gives to gain visibility/goodwill)
If no capacity to “give” significantly on your Board then most likely no real capacity to “get” either
Strong Board can overcome many problems
12
Board: Bridge to Resources1. Give appropriate to means --100% participation.2. Advocate for organization.3. Help fundraise:
Arrange gifts/grants/sponsorships from group they represent or with which affiliated (company, foundation, club, congregation, family).
ID/rate other prospective donors. “Open doors.” Solicit peer commitments (when appropriate).
Board – collectively – must have these capabilities even if each individual member does not.
Need to consider these tasks when targeting people as potential future Board members.
13
Continuity of Effort Remember the old Fund Raising “Cycle.”
Get Gift, Renew Gift, Upgrade Gift!
Fundraising needs to be an everyday responsibility of all staff, includes: Talking up agency. Making contacts & adding to central contact base. Fundraising every year. Communicating with current, past and prospective donors. Solicit aggressively, effectively & efficiently.
StewardshipGeneral Donors want gifts to organization used lawfully and well Also want reasonable thanks/positive attention (unless
giving anonymously)
Grants & Sponsorships – special stewardship issues Do what, where, when promised or engage timely to re-
negotiate Reports timely & complete Meet or exceed benefits/recognitions promised
Good Stewardship = the “set up” for renewal/upgrading!
15
Business Community Everybody is somebody’s customer! Businesses will give – “sponsor” – for visibility/goodwill with current
& prospective customers.
Need right proposition / right sponsors. Wrong proposition / prospective sponsor won’t work!
Small groups serving small areas should generally focus on very local businesses. Bank branch, Food/Drug, Insurance, Realtor, Auto Sales or Repair
Sometimes special value proposition opens-up larger companies.
Compliance/goodwill with regulators – Banks & CDCs (CRA credit) Cost savings – Healthcare corps and clinics (GOMER reduction)
16
Sponsorship Increasingly popular. Combines philanthropy (Purposive Incentive) and
advertising/marketing (Material Incentive). Audiences an organization can deliver important. Up to 4 audiences for any sponsorship!
1. Primary Audience – Attendees/Users.2. Secondary Audience – Those promoted to directly (mailing list).3. Tertiary Audience – Those learn of via media.4. “Super” Audience – The “Asker” (Why major community events
always have high level “Host Committee”).
17
Value proposition for sponsors Nature/Business Relevance of Audiences.
How many/who will attend? Who/how many get promo materials? Media promotion (if any)? Who is asking?
How will sponsors be recognized? Listed in publicity? Name/logo on take away materials? Presence at program/event? Opportunity to welcome attendees? Right to give attendees logo items or materials.
No event/program needs coffee mugs or tote bags so much you should accept logo items in lieu of cash!
18
Sponsor Work as well as Events
Businesses will sponsor work as well as events if can “get arms around it.”
A few things for which clinics might seek sponsors:
Health Fairs “Flu-Free Fridays” School check ups / Athletic team physicals Health Screenings
Seen all the above – only limit is your creativity!
Final thought – sponsorships have a price. You can/should “make money” on these --support overhead as well as thing sponsored (NOT like grants with budget based on costs)!!!!
19
Clubs and Congregations
Civic, fraternal and religious groups support causes.
Sometimes (not always) tied to volunteerism… ID some volunteer opportunities just in case.
Usually requires “insider” w/ties to your group to make the connection and advocate for you.
Board should be path to such insiders.
20
Individual Donors
Members of community should give something. More money in/tied to many communities than may
realize. Average household with two Social Security checks has
spendable income equivalent to one $22/hour worker. Property owners (landlords). Communities have “alumni” (a Doc, Lawyer & CPA realistically
more likely to give than celebrity). After Board gives, should ask friends/relatives to “join me
in supporting this important cause.” (1 on 1, “parlor meeting” or email/social media).
In year two (after donors acquired in more intimate way), may be possible to renew gifts via US Mail or email.
21
Small/Family Foundations: Better source for flexible funding than larger peers.
Board prepared to be conduit to resources HUGELY helpful here (“interlocking directorate”– C. Wright Mills).
Every area has small/family foundations that give toward broad purposes (“hip pocket” foundations).
Giving generally modest but so are expectations --secure with proposals committing organization to little/no incremental expense.
Review foundations directories to find. Look for familiar names among donors, board, officers.
“Reach out and touch someone” before spending too much time on proposal.
22
Fundraising Plan/Program
Board Giving & “Getting”
Secure 100% participation at substantial level (determined by individual circumstances). Become “qualified” (credible) solicitors. ALL help fundraise in some appropriate way. ID & Rate Prospects, Open Doors, Solicit (when appropriate).
Board Upgrading
ID 3 to 5 people you can realistically hope to recruit to Board. (Give $500+/year. Arrange gift from employer/foundation/group. Solicit 3 to 5 others to also give.) Who/how/when to recruit?
Stewardship Assure systems to thank, receipt and publicly acknowledge donors in-place. Make sure programs & initiatives well-conducted, resources properly used/accounted for and reports timely.
Continuity of Effort
Adequate resources for continuing FR effort in-place. Initially, mostly allocation of Board and Leadership TIME with some funds. Later, dedicated staff.
Business Community
ID sponsorship opportunities w/in organization. ID 10 or more prospective business donors & sponsors. Prep sponsorship “package.” Reach out to prospects. Educate on cause. Expose to give/sponsorship opportunities & make the “ask.”
Clubs and Congregations
Work with Board to ID 3 to 5 clubs, societies or congregations that might support group. Through “insiders,” approach seeking opportunities to apply, present, preach or do whatever group asks those seeking its help to do.
Individuals After giving, Board members solicit family and friends 1 on 1, parlor meeting or via email/US Mail. Those w/in community w/resources ID’d and solicited. Renew (year 2), Upgrade (year 3).
Foundations (Major)
Research. Find 3 to 5 viable prospects. Use relationships (if available) to seek discussion of opportunities to collaborate. If no relationship, approach via stated method. If invited, apply.
Foundations(Small & Family)
Via Board members and other friends, ID and approach 5 to 10 local small/family (low expectation) foundations seeking discussion. After invitation to apply, follow process.
23
Michael J. Montgomery
Mike Montgomery is a Detroit-based fundraising and economic development consultant with his own firm, Montgomery Consulting, and an affiliation with the Remington Group. He is also an adjunct professor in the College of Management at Lawrence Technological University in Southfield, Michigan.
At LTU, he teaches “Mgt 6083 - Comprehensive Fund Development for Nonprofits” (a 3 credit hour grad class) as well as an intensive two-day non-credit introductory program for fundraisers and grant seekers.
Earlier in his career he was the head fundraiser for Focus: HOPE, a staff fundraiser for Wayne State, a program consultant to the Hudson-Webber Foundation, and a US Department of State Foreign Service Officer.
He holds an M.A. from the University of Michigan and an A.B. from Columbia University.
Email: [email protected] or [email protected]