particulate properties of the dead sea retrieved by the physical optics method
DESCRIPTION
Particulate Properties of the Dead Sea Retrieved by the Physical Optics Method. By: Derrick Griffin. Abstract. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Particulate Properties of the
Dead Sea Retrieved by the Physical Optics Method
By: Derrick Griffin
It is a well-known fact that the Dead Sea located in Jordan, Israel is one of the saltiest lakes in the world, whose salinity is approximately 30%. Such a huge salinity makes it almost biologically lifeless. However this lake contains large quantities of different minerals and some quantity of dissolved organic matter. Minerals of the Dead Sea are important for medicinal and cosmetics purposes. Unfortunately, the Dead Sea is slowly drying up and soon it will no longer be around in years to come. We can help preserve the Dead Sea and it’s important that we use its wealth more rationally to prevent or delay its death. Thus it is imperative that we find answers to the following questions: Which minerals are exactly dispersed within the water? What are the minerals concentration and their vertical and horizontal space distribution? We must find if this solution is unique and stable?
Abstract
Ocean Optics Team
2004 Optical Expedition Scientific Team
Absorption & Attenuation & Number of Wavelengths
Particulate Attenuation as cpart = apart + bpart.
Introduction
Which method did I use to conduct my research?
What are the benefits of using the Optical method?
Methods
Data Visualization
Data CollectionDepth
(m) ap(412) ap(440) bp(412) bp(440) cp(412) cp(440) bbp(660)
1.5 0.142 0.097 1.104 1.080 1.246 1.1771.076E-
02
1.5 0.137 0.094 1.109 1.084 1.246 1.1791.081E-
02
1.5 0.136 0.092 1.129 1.111 1.265 1.2031.081E-
02
1.5 0.143 0.099 1.142 1.118 1.285 1.2171.080E-
02
Dead Sea
Dead Sea
What problems are we trying to solve?
What are our parameters?
Statement Of The Problem
Depth_min (m) Depth_max (m) Depth_mean (m)1.5 10.000 5.810 20.000 15.020 30.000 25.030 40.000 35.040 50.000 45.050 100.000 75.0
100 150.000 125.0150 200.000 175.0200 250.000 225.0250 286.317 268.2
Setup Of The Problem
How did we solve our research problem?
Did we make any assumptions about our solution?
Solution Of The Problem
g m
0.741 3.736
0.761 3.755
0.687 3.679
0.628 3.616
0.512 3.488
0.486 3.459
0.391 3.344
0.417 3.376
0.496 3.471
0.498 3.472
Solution Of The Problem
€
m =g + 3 − 0.5exp(−6γ )
0.1 1 10 1001E-091E-081E-071E-061E-051E-041E-031E-021E-011E+001E+011E+02
(0.2, 10, 3)(0.2, 50, 3)(0.2, 10, 4)(0.2, 50, 4)(1, 10, 3)(1, 50, 3)(1, 10, 4)
D (mm)
f(D) (
mm
-1)
Solution Of The Problem
np(660)1.1041.1071.1161.1381.1351.1331.1301.1301.1321.132
€
npart =1 + Bpart0.5377+ 0.4867(μ −3)2
1.4676 + 2.2950(μ − 3)2 + 2.3113(μ − 3)4[ ]
kp(555) kp(555)1.313E-03 1.017E-031.253E-03 9.797E-041.809E-03 1.524E-032.485E-03 3.105E-039.727E-04 2.686E-037.273E-04 2.493E-035.712E-04 2.403E-035.311E-04 2.376E-037.166E-04 2.333E-036.960E-04 2.321E-03
Solution Of The Problem
€
ρ '(λ ) =4πD32nw(λ )kpart(λ )
λ
D32 D32
1.517 0.9531.426 0.9211.675 1.0072.063 1.1272.961 1.3663.236 1.4324.327 1.6703.986 1.5993.184 1.4193.224 1.429
Solution Of The Problem
€
D32 =D3 f (D )dD
D min
D max,
∫
D2 f (D )dDD min
D max,
∫ =
(μ − 3)(Dmax4−μ −Dmin
4−μ )(μ − 4)(Dmax
3−μ −Dmin3−μ )
ρ(0.555) ρ(0.555)2.466 1.5502.402 1.5523.035 1.8244.481 2.4476.256 2.8856.734 2.9798.792 3.3948.116 3.2566.611 2.9476.666 2.954
Solution Of The Problem
€
ρ(λ ) =2πD32nw(λ )(npart −1)
λ
Solution Of The Problem
CV(Qa) CV(Qa)4.773E-07 6.088E-074.467E-07 5.653E-073.577E-07 4.173E-072.997E-07 2.354E-077.058E-07 2.580E-079.146E-07 2.706E-071.296E-06 3.135E-071.322E-06 3.012E-078.610E-07 2.676E-078.836E-07 2.683E-07
€
Qa =1 +2exp(−ρ ')
ρ '+
2[exp(−ρ ') −1]ρ '( )2
€
Qc = 2 − 4 exp(−ρ tan ξ )cosξ sin(ρ − ξ )
ρ+
cosξρ
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟2
cos(ρ − 2ξ ) ⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥+ 4
cosξρ
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟2
cos2ξ
Npart (mL-3) Npart (mL-3)5.716E+06 4.452E+063.500E+06 2.788E+067.300E+06 4.947E+061.374E+07 5.623E+068.592E+07 1.338E+071.362E+08 1.629E+073.542E+08 2.897E+073.060E+08 2.483E+071.236E+08 1.569E+071.305E+08 1.605E+07
Solution Of The Problem
€
Npart =6π
Cv
(μ −4)(Dmax1−μ −Dmin
1−μ )(μ −1)(Dmax
4−μ −Dmin4−μ )
ρpart (kg/l) ρpart (kg/l)
2.25 2.252.28 2.282.33 2.332.49 2.492.46 2.462.45 2.452.43 2.432.43 2.432.45 2.452.44 2.44
Solution Of The Problem
€
ρpart =npart −0.7717
0.1475.
TSM (g/m^3) TSM (g/m^3) 1.074E+00 1.370E+001.017E+00 1.287E+008.339E-01 9.728E-017.452E-01 5.854E-011.737E+00 6.349E-012.239E+00 6.623E-013.144E+00 7.607E-013.210E+00 7.314E-012.106E+00 6.544E-012.158E+00 6.552E-01
Solution Of The Problem
€
TSM = ρ partCv
ap(412)
0.110
0.100
0.096
0.092
0.091
0.087
0.090
0.088
0.082
0.082
Displaying Absorption
cp(412)1.2801.2391.0790.8260.8700.8910.9530.9380.8850.885
Displaying Attenuation
bp(412)
1.171
1.140
0.982
0.734
0.780
0.804
0.862
0.850
0.803
0.803
Displaying Backscattering
Mathematical Solution
Not a unique solution
Where the parameters met?
Results
Create Code to compute all 1748 Values
Provide more accurate visual of data
Future Work
The Ocean Optics Team would like to give special thanks to Dr. Hayden, our mentors Dr. Sokoletsky, Je’aime Powell, Jeff Wood, and all faculty and staff who have helped me attain valuable resources that can be utilized in my future endeavours.
Acknowledgments
Boss, E., W. S. Pegau, W. D. Gardner, J. R. V. Zaneveld, A. H.Barnard, M. S. Twardowski, G. C. Chang, and T. D. Dickey. 2001. The spectral particulate attenuation and particle size distribution in the bottom boundary layer of a continental shelf, J. Geophys. Res. 106: 9509–9516.
Hulst van de, H. C. 1981. Light Scattering by Small Particles. Dover Publ. Inc., New York, 470 pp. Mitchell, D. L. 2002. Effective diameter in radiative transfer: General definition, applications, and limitations.
J. Atmospheric Sciences. 59: 2330-2346. Morel, A. and A. Bricaud. 1981. Theoretical results concerning light absorption in a discrete medium and
application to specific absorption of phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res. 28: 1375-1393. Morel, A. and A. Bricaud. 1986. Inherent optical properties of algal cells including picoplankton: Theoretical
and experimental results, pp. 521-559. In: Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 214. Twardowski, M. S., E. Boss, J. B. Macdonald, W. S. Pegau, A. H. Barnard, and J. R. V. Zaneveld. 1999.
Retrieving particle composition from the backscattering ratio and spectral attenuation in marine waters. URL http://argon.oce.orst.edu/biooptics/ members/twardowski/bbn_txt.pdf.
Woźniak, B. and D. Stramski. 2004. Modeling the optical properties of mineral particles suspended in seawater and their influence on ocean reflectance and chlorophyll estimation from remote sensing algorithms. Applied Optics. 43: 3489-3503.
Garber, R. A. 1980. The Sedimentology of the Dead Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA, 169 pp
Gavrieli, I. 1997. Halite deposition in the Dead Sea: 1960-1993. pp. 161-170. In: Niemi, T., Ben- Avraham, Z., and Gat, J. R. (Eds.). The Dead Sea - The Lake and its Setting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Gertman, I., and A. Hecht. 2002. The Dead Sea hydrography from 1992 to 2000. J. Mar. Syst. 35: 169-181. Sokoletsky L. Boss E. Gildor H. Department of Environmental Sciences and Energy Research, The Weizmann
Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
References
QUESTIONS?