participants' feedback from eu survey (2014-15) - · pdf fileparticipants' feedback...
TRANSCRIPT
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
Participants'
feedback from EU
Survey (2014-15)~159,000 SMS; ~53,500 SMP;
~39,000 Mobility for Staff
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
64% 64%83%
16%32%31%
Date: in 12 pts
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
KA1: Participants' feedback
from EU Survey (2014-15) –
Further Analysis~159,000 SMS; ~53,500 SMP; ~39,000 Mobility for
Staff
Lloyd Anthony Huitson
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Important because of the strong correlationbetween course catalogues and recognition
•Suomi: 39%
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Shows countries whose HEIs have particularlygood communication with sending institutions, and/or have a well organised induction programme
•Suomi: 79%
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Can also be affected by the student
•Lowest country – 61% on time
•Hyvä Suomi, hyvä korkeakoulut & koordinaattorit!!!
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Lowest country – 54% satisfaction
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Lowest country – 95% believed they had receivedequal treatment
•Lowest HEI – 27% felt equally treated
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Lowest country – 65% satisfaction with handling of queries
•Lowest HEI – 17% satisfaction with handling of queries
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
• Suomi: 72% (ylioppilaskuntien jäsenyys selittää?)
Date: in 12 ptsEducation and Culture
WHY?
HOW?
WHAT?
WHEN?
•Suomi: 88%
•Importance of mobility periods in Professional Development Plans
Participants’ feeback from EU SurveyIncoming and outgoing student mobility,
Finland2014-2015
Hall of fameHEIs with the highest level of equal treatment
(inbound)
All HEIs average79%
Hall of fameHEIs with the most up-to-date course catalogues
(inbound)
All HEIs average39%
100% course content satisfaction(inbound)
All HEIs average81%
Hall of fameHighest Erasmus+ experience satisfaction (SM)
(inbound)
All HEIs average65%
Hall of fameHighest Erasmus+ experience satisfaction (ST)
(inbound)
All HEIs average83%
Hall of fameHEIs with the greatest academic mentoring satisfaction
(inbound)
All HEIs average80%
100% teaching quality satisfaction(inbound)
All HEIs average80%
Hall of fameBest HEIs at signing Learning Agreement before mobility
(Outgoing students)
All parties signed LA before mobility – All HEIs average 74%
Hall of fameBest HEIs at informing outgoing students on how the grades awarded at
the receiving institution would be transferred upon return
All HEIs average11%
Hall of fameBest HEIs at providing administrative support arrangements
to outgoing students
All HEIs average81%
Hall of fameBest HEIs at providing academic mentoring to outgoing students
All HEIs average66%
To what extent did the Erasmus+ grant (EU funds only) cover your overall expenses related to your mobility
period? (outbound)
40%
42%
14%
4%
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
Through my stay abroad with Erasmus+, I learned better how to... (outbound)
Thanks to this stay abroad with Erasmus+… (outbound)
14%
27%
9%
2%
0%
9%
20%
15%
7%
1%
8%
22%
17%
4%
1%
9%
22%
17%
4%
0%
0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %
Strongly agree
Rather agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Rather disagree
Strongly disagree
16%
23%
7%
1%
0%
11%
19%
13%
4%
1%
11%
19%
15%
2%
1%
11%
21%
13%
2%
0%
UAS
Was the selection procedure at your sending institution fair and transparent? (outbound)
73 %
3 %
24 %Yes
No
86% 82% 79%70% 70% 70%
58%
43%
70%
88%82% 79%
66%
50%39%
34%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Learningoffer
Country Language City andculture
Social life Facilitiesand services
forint.students
Ranking ErasmusAlumni
feedback
Inbound Outbound
Important factors to choose receiving institution
Date: in 12 pts
Kiitos!Kysyttävää, ajatuksia?
Education and Culture
Date: in 12 pts
Kysymyksiä pohdittavaksi
• Mitkä tekijät selittävät hyviä / heikkoja tuloksia?
• Miten / minkälaisia mahdollisuuksia korkeakouluilla on kehittää toimintaansa?
• Miten EUSurveytä ja/tai raportointia tulisi kehittää?
Education and Culture
Date: in 12 pts
Mitkä tekijät selittävät suomalaiskorkeakoulujen hyviä / heikkoja tuloksia?
Education and Culture
Date: in 12 pts
Miten / minkälaisia mahdollisuuksia korkeakouluilla on kehittää toimintaansa?
Education and Culture
Date: in 12 pts
Miten EUSurveytä ja/tai raportointia tulisi kehittää?
Education and Culture