OUTLINE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWDEAN JOSÉ M. ROY III

I. NATURE AND SCOPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

A. DefinitionOrigin and DevelopmentSubject MatterClassificationDistinguished from other branches of law

Republic v. CA, 200 SCRA 226

B. Creation, Organization and Abolition of Administrative AgenciesLegal Bases for CreationForms and PurposesMethods of Re-Organization and Abolition

Cariño v. CHR, 204 SCRA 483Presidential Anti-Dollar v. CA, 171 SCRA 348

(definition of quasi-judicial body)Pangasinan v. PSC 70 Phil. 221Peo. v. Maceren, 79 SCRA 450

II. CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

A. Separation of powers

US v. Barrias, 11 Phil. 327Sunville Timber v. Abad, 206 SCRA 482Noblejas v. Teehankee, 23 SCRA 405

B. Non-delegation of Powers

US v. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil. 1Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 288 (1935)Ynot v. IAC, 148 SCRA 659

C. Exceptions: Permissible Delegation

Edu v. Ericta, 35 SCRA 481Cruz v. Youngberg, 56 Phil. 234Solicitor Genenral v. MMA, 204 SCRA 837Allegre v. Collector, 53 Phils. 394Mun. of Cardona v. Mun. of Binangonan, 36 Phil. 547Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726Eastern Shipping v. POEA, 166 SCRA 533Osmeña v. Orbos, 220 SCRA 703Guingona v. Carague, 196 SCRA 221

D. Requisites for Valid Delegation

Pelaez v. Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569

E. Completeness

U.S. v. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil. 1

F. Standards

Peo. v. Rosenthal, 68 Phil. 328Cervantes v. Auditor General, 91 Phil. 359Peo. v. Joliffe, 105 Phil. 677Balbuna v. Sec. of Education, 110 Phil. 150A.L.A. Schecter Poultry v. U.S., 295 U.S. 495

III. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES

Chapter IV

A. Sources And Scope

Guerzon v. Court of Appeals, 164 SCRA 182

Construction Of Grant Of Powers

Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497Matienzo v. Abellera, 162 SCRA 1PASEI v. Torres, 212 SCRA 298Realty Exchange Venture Corp. v. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665MKSE v. SEC, 14 SCRA 620

B. (Executive)/Administrative Functions

PICOP v. Deputy Exec. Secretary, 184 SCRA 606Evangelista v. Jarencio, 68 SCRA 99

C. Administrative Construction And Interpretation

Español v. Chairman, PVA, 137 SCRA 314Victorias Milling v. Social Security System, 4 SCRA 627Hilado v. CIR, 100 Phil. 288 Co v. CA, 227 SCRA 444

D. Promulgation Of Rules

Taxicab Operators v. BOT, 117 SCRA 597

Tañada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446

Rate-Fixing Powers

Phil. Consumers v . Sec. of Education, 153 SCRA 622PHILCOMSAT v. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218RCPI v. NTC, 184 SCRA 517Republic v. Medina, 41 SCRA 643

E. Requisites For Validity Of Rules

Issued On Authority Of Law

Vda. de Piñeda v. Peña, 187 SCRA 22

Within Scope Of Law

Luzon Polymers v. Clave, 209 SCRA 711Lina. v. Cariño, 221 SCRA 515

Reasonableness

Lupangco v. CA, 160 SCRA 848DECS v. Diego, 180 SCRA 533

F. Administrative Rules With Penal Sanctions

Pesigan v. Angeles, 129 SCRA 174Peo. v. Veridiano II, 132 SCRA 523

G. Construction Of Administrative Rules And Regulations

D. M. Consunji v. COA, 199 SCRA 549Phil. Petroleum v. Mun. of Pililia, 198 SCRA 82Cebu Oxygen and Acetylene Corp. v. Drilon, 176 SCRA 24

H. Repeal Of Administrative Rules And Regulations

Hilado v. CIR, 100 Phil. 288 (Taken with Co v. CA)

CASES FOR CHAPTER 5

DEFINITION OF QUASI-JUDICIAL POWERLupangco v. CA, 160 SCRA 848Torres v. Hibionada, 191 SCRA 268

QUASI-JUDICIAL POWER DISTINGUISHED FROM JUDICIAL POWERCariño v. CHR, 204 SCRA 483

CONFERMENT OF QUASI-JUDICIAL POWERSMagpale v. CSC, 215 SCRA 398Antipolo Realty v. NHA, 153 SCRA 399Miller v. Mardo, 2 SCRA 898

CLASSIFICATION OF ADJUDICATING POWERSSalazar v. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145RCPI v. NTC, 215 SCRA 455Boiser v. CA, 122 SCRA 945Deiparine v. CA, 221 SCRA 503

SOURCES OF JURISDICTIONESTOPPELTijam v. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29EFFECT OF EXPIRATION OF LAWRoxas v. Sayoc, 100 Phil. 448

DUE PROCESSRivera v. CSC, 240 SCRA 43PNOC v. NLRC, 201 SCRA 487Nera v. Auditor-General, 164 SCRA 1Dizon v. PSC, 50 SCRA 500Dormitorio v. Fernandez, 72 SCRA 388Savory v. Lakas ng Manggagawa, 62 SCRA 258

DUE PROCESS IN QUASI-CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGSAsprec v. Itchon, 16 SCRA 921

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO HEAR AND RECEIVE EVIDENCEAmerican Cyanamid v. Dir. of Patents, 76 SCRA 568Skyworld v. SEC, 211 SCRA 565

ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE AND HEARING:Suntay v. People, 101 Phil. 833

RULES OF PROCEDURE:Mendoza v. CSC, 233 SCRA 657Mangubat v. de Castro, 163 SCRA 608

EVIDENCE IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGSRabago v. NLRC, 200 SCRA 158Maceda v. ERB, 199 SCRA 454

FORM OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONSDadubo v. CSC, 223 SCRA 747

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL AND REVIEWCorona v. CA, 214 SCRA 378Del Castillo v. CSC, 241 SCRA 317

RES JUDICATA AND REOPENING OF CASESVDA Fish Broker v. NLRC, 228 SCRA 681Sy Hong v. Comm. of Immigration, L-10224, 11 May 1957

-- unreported in 101 Phil. -- must obtain Advance Sheets

CHAPTER 6

Masangkay v. Comelec, 6 SCRA 27

CHAPTER 7 (provisional)

JUDICIAL REVIEW OF OR RELIEF AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

First Lepanto v. CA, 231 SCRA 30First Lepanto v. CA, 237 SCRA 519Liboro v. CA, 218 SCRA 193

Right to Judicial Review

Where Review is Not Granted by Statute

Macailing v. Andrada, 31 SCRA 126Dabuet v. Roche Pharmaceuticals, 149 SCRA 386Lupangco v. CA, 160 SCRA 848 (jurisdictional issue only)Board of Medical Education v. Alfonso, 176 SCRA 304Almine v. CA, 177 SCRA 796

Finality of Administrative Action for Purposes of Review

Aguinaldo v. SEC, 163 SCRA 262

Exceptions to Doctrine of Finality

PT & T v. COA, 146 SCRA 190

Doctrine of Prior Resort/Primary Jurisdiction

Industrial Enterprises v. CA, 184 SCRA 426RCPI v. NTC, 184 SCRA 517Vidad v. RTC, 227 SCRA 271Saavedra v. DOJ, 226 SCRA 438Freeman v. SEC, 233 SCRA 735

Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

Fernando v. Sto. Tomas, 234 SCRA 546

Baguioro v. Basa, 214 SCRA 437Rosario v. CA, 211 SCRA 384Rosales v. CA, 165 SCRA 344

Appeal to the President

Federation of Free Workers v. Inciong, 161 SCRA 295Tesorero v. Mathay, 185 SCRA 124

Exceptions to the Doctrine of Exhaustion

Aquino-Sarmiento v. Morato, 203 SCRA 515 (question of law)Madrigal v. Lecaroz, 191 SCRA 20 (question of law)Painaga v. Cortes, 202 SCRA 245 (different issue involved)U.P. v. Rasul, 200 SCRA 685 (irreparable damage)Quisumbing v. Gumban, 193 SCRA 520 (whimsical use of power)Estuerte v. CA, 193 SCRA 541 (no remedy available)Brett v. IAC, 191 SCRA 687 (patently illegal)Datiles v. Sucaldito, 186 SCRA 704 (no order)Aquino v. Luntok, 184 SCRA 177 (urgency)Sabello v. DECS, 180 SCRA 623 (poverty)Rocamora v. RTC, 167 SCRA 615 (useless)Palma v. de la Paz, 160 SCRA 751 (substantial compliance)Adrisola v. CA, 133 SCRA 245 (interpretation of contract)