part i the national labor relations commissionnlrc.dole.gov.ph/content/annualreport2012.pdf · it...
TRANSCRIPT
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 1
About the Report This 2012 Performance Report of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) highlights its accomplishment on major programs, projects, and reforms. The statistics used in this Report cover the period January to December 2012. Part I – The National Labor Relations Commission. Part II – Arbitration and Adjudication, presents the caseload and disposition of labor cases through settlement and decision on the merits.
Part III – Reform Projects, presents the results of the NLRC’s 2012 performance in accordance with its Labor and Employment Strategic Plan, and the Philippine Labor and Employment Plan 2011-2016. Part IV – Financial Statements, presents the budget breakdown, and the summary of appropriations and expenditures.
Part I The NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION
Organization The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) is a quasi-judicial agency attached to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) for program and policy coordination only. It was created under Presidential Decree No. 442, otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended, which took effect on November 1, 1974. It took over the functions of the Court of Industrial Relations and the Ad Hoc NLRC created under Presidential Decree No. 21. The NLRC is the principal government agency that hears and decides labor-management disputes. It is tasked to promote and maintain industrial peace by resolving labor and management disputes involving both local and overseas workers through compulsory arbitration after mandatory conciliation- mediation conferences failed. This is in consonance with the mission of the NLRC to resolve labor disputes in the fairest, quickest, least expensive and most effective way possible. The Commission Proper of the NLRC is tripartite in representation. Under R.A. No. 9347, the Commission Proper has eight (8) Divisions, each is composed of three (3) members with the Presiding Commissioner representing the government sector and the other two members representing the workers’ and
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 2
the employers’ sectors.
Of the eight (8) Divisions, the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Divisions handle cases coming from the National Capital Region and other parts of Luzon, and the Seventh and Eight Divisions, cases from the Visayas and Mindanao, respectively.
The Chairman, aided by the Executive Clerk of the Commission, has exclusive administrative supervision over the NLRC, its regional arbitration branches and all its personnel, including the Labor Arbiters.
The Commission Proper sits en banc only for purposes of promulgating rules and regulations governing the hearing and disposition of cases, and formulating policies affecting its administration and operations.
The Commission Proper sitting en banc may, on temporary or emergency
basis, allow cases within the jurisdiction of any Division to be transferred to and be heard and decided by any other Division which docket may allow additional workload and such transfer will not expose litigants to unnecessary additional expense. The Commission Proper through its Divisions have exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases decided by Labor Arbiters at the Regional/Sub-Regional Arbitration Branches. The First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Divisions have their respective offices in the National Capital Region, while the Seventh and Eighth Divisions in the cities of Cebu and Cagayan de Oro, respectively.
The Chairman is the Presiding Commissioner of the First Division. In case of the effective absence or incapacity of the Chairman, the
Presiding Commissioner of the Second Division shall be the Acting Chairman.
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 3
Performance Planning Framework The 2012 performance planning framework is a continuation of the goals and objectives of the NLRC under the leadership of Chairman Gerardo C. Nograles, in line with the 22-Point Labor and Employment Agenda of President Benigno S. Aquino III, through Secretary Rosalinda Dimapilis-Baldoz, which is to reform labor arbitration and adjudication systems by streamlining procedures, removing red tape, and at the same time, restore integrity and fairness in the system.
CHAIRMAN
Executive Clerk
Mgt. & Administrative Dept. Research & Legal Dept.
Administrative Division Mgt. & Fiscal Division Legal Division Research, Info. & Pub. Division
SRABs I, IV & V SRABs VI &VII SRABs IX-XII
NCR, CAR & RABs I-V
First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Sixth
Division
Seventh
Division
SeventhDivision
Eighth Division
RABs VI-VIII RABs IX-XIII
First Division
Second Division
Third Division
Fourth Division
Fifth Division
Sixth Division
OORRGGAANNIIZZAATTIIOONNAALL SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE UUNNDDEERR RR..AA.. NNoo.. 99334477
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 4
Summary Table: Performance Measure (Quantity and Quality) On performance measure based on quantity, the table below presents FY 2012 case disposition vis-à-vis the target in the following: (a) Project Speedy and Efficient Delivery of Labor Justice (SpeED), as one of the 22-Point Labor & Employment Agenda of President Aquino (i.e. to ensure that 98% of all pending labor cases are disposed of with quality decisions); (b) Office Performance Commitment Review (OPCR) on Case Disposition, with a target of disposing 98% of all cases filed in March 2012 & earlier cases by end of December 2012; and (c) Overall Accomplishment per OPIF.
PROJECT SPEEDY & EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF LABOR JUSTICE (SpeED) 5
(To dispose 98% of cases pending in December 2011 & earlier by end of September 2012)
Level
Target
Actual
%
Regional Arbitration Branches (Original Cases)
9,612
9,399
97.78%
Commission Proper (Appealed Cases)
2,472
2,463
99.63%
Grand Total
12,084
11,862
98.16%
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW (OPCR)
(To dispose 98% of cases filed in March 2012 & earlier cases by end of December 2012)
Level
Target
Actual
%
Regional Arbitration Branches (Original Cases)
17,722
17,532
98.93%
Commission Proper (Appealed Cases)
6,009
5,999
99.83%
Grand Total
23,731
23,531
99.16%
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 5
For 2012, the NLRC posted an overall output of 42,598 cases, 30,888 as original cases from the Regional Arbitration Branches (RABs), and 11,710 as appealed cases from the Commission Proper.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (PER OPIF) (Target vs. Actual)
Level
Target
Actual
%
Regional Arbitration Branches (Original Cases)
33,000
30,888
94%
Commission Proper (Appealed Cases)
13,500
11,710
87%
Grand Total
46,500
42,598
92%*
*Accomplishment must be at least 90% of its target per DBM Memorandum Circular No. 2012-03, November 12, 2012.
On performance based on quality, the table below reflects FY 2012 affirmation rate by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of the NLRC decisions.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE (QUALITY) (Affirmance vs. Reversal)
Appellate Courts
Appealed Cases
Affirmed
Reversed
No.
%
No.
%
Court of Appeals
1,094
1,016
93%
78
7%
Supreme Court
1,203
1,174
97%
29
3%
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 6
Part II ARBITRATION and ADJUDICATION
Caseload and Disposition For 2012, the NLRC was able to maintain a higher level of disposition of cases, and posted gains in reducing the number of pending cases.
In 2012, the NLRC posted an overall output of 42,598 cases, 30,888 as original cases from the Regional Arbitration Branches (RABs), and 11,710 as appealed cases from the Commission Proper. In terms of inflow versus outflow of cases, of the 30,107 received original cases, 30,888 or 103% were disposed of by the Regional Arbitration Branches (RABs). On the other hand, of the 11,085 received appeal cases, 11,710 or 106% were disposed of by the Commission Proper. Based on a ten (10)-year trend, from 2003-2012, the outflow or the cases disposed of outnumbered the inflow or the cases received by the RABs as shown in the graph below:
REGIONAL ARBITRATION BRANCHES
33,474 31,162 29,729 30,543 31,644 32,912 33,401 32,958 30,812 30,107
33,02432,879 32,761
29,959
33,511 33,907
32,825 33,416
32,045
30,888
27,000
28,000
29,000
30,000
31,000
32,000
33,000
34,000
35,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cases Received Cases Disposed
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 7
Similarly, the outflow or cases disposed of in most years outnumbered the inflow or cases received by the Commission Proper as shown in the graph below:
Moreover, all efforts were exerted towards amicable settlement of labor disputes during the compulsory arbitration process. As a result, settlement efforts have been successful to a substantial degree every year. Records show that from 2003 to 2012, the average settled cases by the RABs posted at 13,889 or 43% of the average disposal.
SETTLEMENT THROUGH
MANDATORY CONFERENCE
13,30613,721
13,376
15,446
14,57114,595
12,82113,382
13,866 13,808
10,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
16,000
17,000
18,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
COMMISSION PROPER
9,204 9,385 10,472 10,110 9,069 12,266 11,678 11,543 11,372 11,085
11,71011,817
8,579 9,302 10,227 9,742
10,454
13,427 13,50412,546
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cases Received Cases Disposed
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 8
For FY 2012, the RABs posted 13,306 or 43% share of settled cases during the mandatory conciliation and mediation conference of the compulsory arbitration procedure.
The above settled cases are in addition to the settled/withdrawn
request/cases during the early part of the mandatory conciliation and mediation conference under the Single-Entry Approach (SEnA), which was posted at 3,693 or 35% settlement/withdrawn out of 10,635 requests for assistance, with P70,296,086.00 settlement award, and 3,084 workers benefitted. The Single-Entry Approach (SEnA) program of the DOLE serves as entry points in speeding up the resolution of all labor issues and dejudicializing the process of handling labor cases. Pursuant to Department Order No. 107, s. 2010, the SEnA was fully implemented by the NLRC in 2011.
SINGLE-ENTRY APPROACH (SEnA)
Requests
for Assistance
Settled/
Withdrawn
Referred to Med. Arb.
(Other Offices)
Referred to
Comp. Arb.
(NLRC)
Pending End
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
10,635
3,693
35%
57
1%
5,879
55% 1,006
9%
All in all, 16,999 requests/cases are disposed of by the NLRC through settlement.
Project Speedy and Efficient Delivery of Labor Justice (SpeED) 5 One of the institutional reforms of President Benigno S. Aquino, Jr., through DOLE Secretary Rosalinda Dimapilis-Baldoz and NLRC Chairman Gerardo C. Nograles, is to pursue responsive public service delivery and efficient use of resources through speedy and efficient delivery of labor justice through the Project SpeED (Speedy and Efficient Delivery of Labor Justice), which aims to reduce case backlog and to ensure that case dockets remain current (Agenda No. 6 of 22-Point Philippine Labor and Employment Agenda).
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 9
The current Project SpeED 5 was designed to ensure that 98% of all December 2011 and earlier pending cases are disposed of by the end of September 2012. At the end of September 2012, the NLRC posted a total case disposal of 11,862 or 98.16%, 9,399 or 97.78% from the Regional Arbitration Branches, and 2,463 or 99.63% from the Commission Proper.
Project SpeED 5*
Level
Target Cases
Resolved
Cases
Pending Cases
Judgment
Award
Workers’
Benefitted
No. % No. %
RABs
9,612
9,399
97.78%
213
2.22%
1,613,916,272.37
10,805
Commission
2,472
2,463
99.64%
9
0.36%
341,108,510.21
2,129
TOTAL
12,084
11,862
98.16%
222
1.84%
1,955,024,782.58
12,934
*Coverage: December 2011 & earlier pending cases Period to Resolve: Nine (9) months (i.e. January 1 to September 30, 2012)
Of all the bureaus, offices and attached agencies, the NLRC garnered the highest number and percentage of enrolled and disposed cases.
Project SpeED 5*
Offices
Enrolled Cases
% Share
of Enrolled Cases
Resolved
Cases
% Share
of Resolved
Cases
Overall
Disposition Rate
Employees Compensation Commission (ECC)
4
0.02%
4
0.02%
100%
Bureau of Labor Relations Commission (BLR)
68
0.33%
54
0.27%
90%
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 10
National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)
12,084
59.49%
11,862
59.60%
98%**
National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB)
166
0.82%
154
0.77%
94%
Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC)
3,927
19.33%
3,849
19.33%
98%
Philippine Overseas and Employment Agency (POEA)
3,838
18.89%
3,767
18.92%
98%
Legal Service (LS)
227
1.12%
217
1.09%
96%
GRAND TOTAL
20,314
100%
19,907
100%
98%
*NCMB report (Project SpeED 5 Secretariat)
The same is true with respect to monetary benefits awarded and workers benefitted, as shown in the table below:
Project SpeED 5*
Offices
Monetary Benefits
Workers Benefitted
National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)
1,955,024,782.58
12,934
National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB)
161,071,639.08
2,892
Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC)
175,468,826.55
12,651
Philippine Overseas and Employment Agency (POEA)
16,974,773.00
31
GRAND TOTAL
2,308,540,021.21
28,502
* NCMB report (Project SpeED 5 Secretariat)
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 11
Ending Caseload At the end of 2011, the RABs and the Commission Proper had total pending of 9,663 original cases, and 2,443 appealed cases, respectively. By December 31, 2012, said numbers stood at 8,713 original cases, and 1,802 appealed cases, a decrease of 950 pending original cases, and 641 pending appealed cases. The decreases on original and appeal cases are significant considering that 30,107 new original cases and 11,085 new appealed cases were filed in 2012.
The graph below shows the reduction of ending caseload every year.
The RABs beginning caseload of 9,663 has now come to an ending caseload of 8,713, while in the Commission Proper, the beginning caseload of 2,443 has reduced to an ending caseload of 1,802. Of 8,713 remaining original cases at the RABs, 8,277 or 95% are newly filed cases or cases filed from April to December 2012. At the Commission Proper, of 1,802 remaining appealed cases, 1,712 or 95% are newly filed cases or cases filed from April to December 2012.
TREND OF ENDING CASELOAD
7,584 7,146 7,771 7,854 7,757 8,1856,888
5,7263,859
2,897 2,443 1,802
8,713
16,81119,35919,809
18,092
14,758 15,124
12,82711,47911,635
11,2779,663
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
COMMISSION RABs
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 12
Judgment: Labor and Management At the RABs, 64% of the total cases were disposed of in favor of labor (workers), while 36% in favor of management (employer). On appealed cases, the Commission Proper disposed of 38% in favor of labor, and 62% in favor of management.
Regional Arbitration Branches
Regional Arbitration Branches
30,888
(78%)
8,713
(22%)
Disposed Ending Caseload
Commission Proper
1,802
(13%)
11,710
(87%)
Disposed Ending Caseload
9,54710,635
11,25511,764 11,601
10,85311,663
11,04610,484
11,561 11,083 10,968
19,92020,962
21,85522,341
22,86121,848
19,106
21,16021,11521,769
19,064
17,326
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Won by Management Won by Labor
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 13
Commission Proper
Judgment: Monetary Awards Amount of judgment awards at the RABs reached P3.87B, benefiting 33,347 workers. Of the total amount awarded and workers benefitted, P1.92B were awarded through settlement, benefitting 18,757 workers, and P1.95 Billion, through cases of merit (decided), benefitting 14,590 workers. At the Commission Proper, P2.90B was awarded, benefitting a total of 8,913 workers.
2,6032,911 2,908
4,7894,390 4,573
3,8723,956
2,480
943
1,5232,139
1,7221,602
1,0211,515
1,797
4,4554,628
2,607
6,320
3,613
9,321
6,311
4,672
4,097
500
1,500
2,500
3,500
4,500
5,500
6,500
7,500
8,500
9,500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Mil
lio
ns
CP RABs
4,448 4,115 3,736 4,192 5,165 4,289 5,121 6,532 6,214 5,599 5,972 7,210
4,5004,175
5,2694,843
5,110 5,0625,453 5,333
6,8957,290
6,947
5,845
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Won by Management Won by Labor
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 14
Of the total judgment award in 2012, the RABs on regular (local) cases awarded P345.1M by way of settlement and P982.0B by way of decisions on the merits.
For OFW cases, P1.6B was awarded through settlement and P969.64M
through decision on the merits.
392 345385416
8521,059 982
1,968
1,109
2,056
10
1,010
2,010
Mil
lio
ns
SETTLED DECIDED
SETTLED 851,967,846.07 392,095,886.45 416,103,007.34 385,335,192.70 345,073,018.11
DECIDED 2,055,728,573.83 1,059,489,931.56 1,108,538,651.46 1,968,072,632.78 981,954,162.85
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
1,4341,575
1,3151,444
1,104
1,504
970905
1,486
777
50
1,050
2,050
Millio
ns
SETTLED DECIDED
SETTLED 1,103,897,163.05 1,434,154,000.77 1,444,335,142.74 1,314,563,827.08 1,575,386,277.15
DECIDED 777,277,677.19 1,504,414,918.66 1,485,805,130.68 905,128,971.89 969,644,376.16
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 15
Affirmation of Judgment
Since decision making is the primordial duty in order to maintain industrial peace and promote social justice, the NLRC, as a personification of labor justice, strives for excellence in deciding labor cases. As a result, the NLRC was able to maintain a higher level of affirmation rate of decisions by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. From 2008 to 2012, the average decisions affirmed by the Court of Appeals numbered 1,048 or 91%, and 99 or 9% only for reversed decisions. At the Supreme Court, the average affirmed decisions numbered 904 or 89%, and 98 or 11% for reversed decisions.
771(93%)
62(7%)
825(90%)
92(10%)
1,264(91%)
123(9%)
1,364(91%)
140(9%)
1,016
(92%)
78
(8%)0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
COURT OF APPEALS
Affirmed
Reversed
619(84%)
117
(16%)
747(86%)
120
(14%)
962(87%)
145(13%)
1,018(93%)
80(7%)
1,174
(97%)
29
(3%)0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SUPREME COURT
Affirmed
Reversed
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 16
Part III REFORM PROJECTS
Streamlining of Procedures
In line with its commitment to continuously streamline the procedures in labor arbitration and adjudication, and pursuant to its power to promulgate rules and regulations, the NLRC En Banc amended the 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure on November May 2012 (En Banc Resolution No. 11-12, Series of 2012).
The 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure, as amended contains new provisions to address the issue of delay and to enforce final decisions effectively. These include, among others, the expanded coverage of prohibited pleadings, utilization of service of private courier as additional mode for service of summons and other legal processes, provisions for specific periods for filing certain pleadings, authority of the Chairman to blacklist bonding companies, strengthening of contempt powers, imposition of fines to ensure compliance with the final decisions, introduction of safeguards to ensure immediate enforcement of judgment, provision for the manner of execution of judgment and the effect of reversal during execution proceedings. The NLRC endeavors to further strengthen its mandatory conciliation and mediation proceedings with the end-view of increasing the number of disposition of cases by way of settlement and reducing time spent in case resolution. For this reason, the Single-Entry Approach (SEnA) was continuously monitored and implemented in all the Regional Arbitration Branches. In the event, the requests for assistance were not settled through the SEnA, all efforts were still exerted during the mandatory conciliation and mediation conferences to settle the cases assigned to the Labor Arbiters in recognition of the importance of conciliation and mediation.
The NLRC also promulgates the 2012 NLRC Sheriffs’ Manual on
Execution of Judgment per En Banc Resolution No. 10-12, Series of 2012. This is to address the public distrust on the process of execution; to expedite the enforcement of decisions; to ensure transparency in the enforcement of decisions through uniform observance of prescribed procedures; and to guarantee receipt of monetary awards by prevailing litigants through institutionalization of safeguards in the handling of fiduciary funds.
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 17
Improvement of Internal Processes
Pursuant to the reform measures for labor arbitration and adjudication system, continuous monitoring of the following are observed: (a) e-raffle of cases and inventory of all (regular, transferred, remanded and revived) cases; and (b) transmittal of records of cases on appeal including Memorandum on Appeal within forty-eight (48) hours from the filing of the appeal.
Also, strict compliance with the “First-In-First-Out” policy in the disposition
of cases (En Banc Resolution No. 13-07, Series of 2007) has been continuously and regularly monitored. As a consequence, majority of the RABs and Divisions attained current status in their case dockets. Similarly, the implementation of acceptable level of performance set for Labor Arbiters and Commissioners, and enforcement of sanctions to non-performing officials is strictly observed. As a penalty measure for non-compliance, the NLRC issued warnings which sometimes lead to withholding of their Representation And Transportation Allowance (RATA); Recognizing the importance of capacity-building and with the implementation of the Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS), the NLRC has participated in the Consultation-Workshop on the Operationalization of the SPMS and Human Resources Division Programs. This is aimed of ensuring the accountability of the agencies and their officials and employees. In view of the budget allocation system, regular monitoring and submission of project procurement management plan to streamline the processing of request of office supplies are regularly observed. The Bids and Awards Committee is required to submit regular reports to ensure transparency and accountability. Further, in line with the strategy under the Philippine Labor and Employment Plan 2011-2016 to ensure transparency and accountability in dispute settlement by posting the status of labor cases at the NLRC website, the NLRC developed a computer program to provide a comprehensive database of all cases at the RABs. The Web-Based Case Tracking System (CTS) is designed to expedite the resolution of cases through the effective monitoring and strict observance of time limits in the conduct of case event, from filing to disposition.
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 18
Strengthening Integrity and Fairness
The NLRC continuously implements and monitors its Integrity Development Action Plan (IDAP), a roadmap in the fight against the perception of graft and corruption. Along this line, the following activities/initiatives/programs are conducted and implemented: (a) Bilis Aksyon Partner (BAP) in compliance with the CSC Memorandum Circular (Mamayan Muna Program) to handle all feedbacks/reports received from the public and other government and non-government organizations; (b) Code of Conduct for Commissioners and Labor Arbiters, and ongoing consultation with the NLRC Employees’ Association (NLRCEA) on the Code of Conduct for the rank-and-file employees; (c) Continuous implementation of New Frontline System to ensure the integrity of raffle system through e-Raffle and to effectively assist litigants in filing complaints; (e) Adoption of Efficiency & Integrity Board (EIB) Rules of Procedure; (f) Creation of Board of Inquiry (BOI), to investigate administrative complaints against Presidential appointees, and the Administrative Complaints Committee (ACC), to hear and investigate administrative complaints against rank-and-file employees; (g) posting of Networth of NLRC Senior Officials at the DOLE and NLRC websites; and (h) regular conduct of moral enhancement seminars for officials and employees.
Improving Quality Decisions
While it is the goal of the NLRC to dispose of labor cases fairly and speedily, it is also tasked to resolve the same with quality decisions. For this reason, continuous monitoring of directives instructing all Presiding/Commissioners to submit to the Chairman the disapproved/not considered draft report/ decision of their reviewers, with their comments, observations, or underscoring the reasons for the disapproval. The Chairman, after evaluation of the draft decision/report, shall take appropriate action which may include filing of cases before the Efficiency and Integrity Board (EIB). Recognizing the essence of capacity building, the NLRC conducted several trainings and seminars, such as: (a) computation of monetary awards; (b) D.O. 18-A on contracting and sub-contracting; (c) 2011 NLRC Rules of Procedure, case and records management; (d) Single-Entry Approach Rules; (e) conciliation-mediation; (f) stenography; and (g) values revisited.
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 19
Implementation of Project SpeED
Consistent with the agenda to reform labor arbitration and adjudication systems by streamlining procedures, Project Speedy and Efficient Delivery of Labor Justice (SpeED) was continuously implemented in the NLRC. Project SpeED was designed to achieve a 98% disposition rate of all cases. In the pursuit of achieving the targets set under the Project SpeEDs, Administrative Orders and Memoranda were issued directing all Presiding/Commissioners of the Commission Proper and Executive/Labor Arbiters of the Main/Sub Regional Arbitration Branches to resolve and dispose of all enrolled cases within the target periods. Strategies for accomplishment of the Project SpeED are also designed to support the reforms, such as but not limited to the following: (a) regular conduct of special task forces of all pending cases, including unresolved cases of retired and separated Labor Arbiters and Commissioners; (b) recommended the appointment of additional Labor Arbiters and Commission Attorneys; (c) continuous monitoring and implementation of the “First-In-First-Out” policy (En Banc Resolution No. 13-07, Series of 2007) in the resolution of cases which directs the Labor Arbiters to dispose of a minimum of twenty-seven (27) cases per month, and to submit monthly reports on their respective outputs to their immediate superiors for proper monitoring, and in case of non-compliance thereof, a penalty of withholding of the RATA is enforced; (d) continuous monitoring of minimum case disposal of 50 every month per Commissioner; (e) strict monitoring of ageing of cases pursuant to the resolution periods set by the Project SpeED, and non-compliance thereof, a penalty is imposed as provided under the En Banc Resolution No. 13-07, Series of 2007; and (f) strict monitoring of attendance of NLRC personnel to ensure efficiency of performance.
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 20
Part IV FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Budget Breakdown
Based on the National Expenditure Program (NEP) for FY 2012, the budget approved by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) posted at P567,952M. Personal Services (PS) accounted for 79.70% budget, with a total allotment of P452,663M, while Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) represented 19.98% at P113,489M. The remaining 0.32% went to Capital Outlay, with allotted P1,800M.
PS
79%
MOOE
20%
CO
1%
PS
MOOE
CO
Financial Statement Summary Table
For FY 2012, the allotments, obligations and balances of the National Labor Relations Commission are summarized as follows:
P/A/P Allotment Class/
Appropriation FY 2012 GAA
Allotment Received
Obligations
Incurred
Unobligated Balance of Allotment
A. Current Year Budget
Personal Services
Salaries & Wages-Regular 305,565,000.00 302,387,840.00 281,725,986.57 20,661,853.43 MPBF – Salaries/Wages 86,814,075.00 86,814,075.00 0.00
Salaries & Wages- Casual 422,000.00 422,000.00 108,648.26 313,351.74
Personnel Economic Relief Allowance
22,320,000.00 22,320,000.00 21,845,935.89 474,064.11
Representation Allowance 18,298,500.00 18,298,500.00 18,625,302.95 (326,802.95)
Transportation Allowance 18,298,500.00 18,298,500.00 18,471,796.45 (173,296.45)
Clothing/Uniform Allowance 3,720,000.00 3,720,000.00 3,780,000.00 (60,000.00) MPBF-Clothing Allowance 897,000.00 760,000.00 137,000.00
Productivity Incentive Bonus 1,860,000.00 1,860,000.00 1,691,000.00 169,000.00
Other Bonuses/Allowances 5,294,725.00 5,086,908.00 207,817.00
Honoraria 133,000.00 (133,000.00)
Longevity Pay - 0.00
Overtime Pay 339,984.63 (339,984.63)
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 21
Cash Gift & Year end bonus 30,070,000.00 30,070,000.00 30,017,182.48 52,817.52 MPBF - YEB 6,966,000.00 6,966,000.00 0.00
Life & Retirement Insurance Contribution
36,591,000.00 46,322,575.00 30,470,108.36 15,852,466.64
PAG-IBIG Contributions 1,130,000.00 1,130,000.00 1,084,073.36 45,926.64
PHILHEALTH Contributions 2,348,000.00 2,348,000.00 2,565,312.50 (217,312.50) MPBF - PHIC 465,000.00 465,000.00 0.00
ECC Contributions 1,119,000.00 1,119,000.00 1,074,119.81 44,880.19 MPBF - ECC 9,000.00 9,000.00 0.00
Pension Benefits - Civilian 10,921,000.00 10,921,000.00 9,085,791.42 1,835,208.58
Other Personnel Benefits 38,451,074.40 (38,451,074.40) Sub-Total 452,663,000.00 559,663,215.00 559,570,300.08 92,914.92
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses
Travel Expenses - Local 6,217,000.00 6,217,000.00 2,562,949.04 3,654,050.96
Training Expenses 4,881,000.00 4,881,000.00 3,281,837.19 1,599,162.81 Supplies Expense 11,871,000.00 11,871,000.00 6,632,917.26 5,238,082.74
Office Supplies Expense 7,685,000.00 7,685,000.00 5,549,421.45 2,135,578.55
Accountable Forms 511,000.00 511,000.00 131,089.65 379,910.35
Medical/Dental 116,000.00 116,000.00 20,000.00 96,000.00
Gasoline, Oil & Lubricants Expense
1,070,000.00 1,070,000.00 563,905.98 506,094.02
Textbooks & Instructional Materials
773,000.00 773,000.00 1,700.00 771,300.00
Other Supplies Expenses 1,716,000.00 1,716,000.00 366,800.18 1,349,199.82
Utility Expenses 14,896,000.00 18,073,160.00 18,364,155.92 (290,995.92)
Water Expenses 4,419,000.00 4,419,000.00 2,252,970.33 2,166,029.67
Electricity Expenses 10,477,000.00 13,654,160.00 16,111,185.59 (2,457,025.59) Communication Services 13,942,000.00 13,942,000.00 17,542,196.44 (3,600,196.44)
Postage & Deliveries 8,695,000.00 8,695,000.00 12,251,444.66 (3,556,444.66)
Tel. Expense-Landline 3,262,000.00 3,262,000.00 3,393,307.39 (131,307.39)
Tel. Expense - Mobile 1,350,000.00 1,350,000.00 1,141,248.32 208,751.68
Internet Expenses 635,000.00 635,000.00 756,196.07 (121,196.07)
Cable, Satellite,Telegraph, Radio Expenses
Advertising Expenses 800,000.00 800,000.00 44,939.59 755,060.41
Printing/Binding Expenses 1,140,000.00 1,140,000.00 476,847.55 663,152.45
Rent Expenses 35,496,000.00 35,496,000.00 34,090,584.33 1,405,415.67
Representation Expenses 100,000.00 100,000.00 320,978.98 (220,978.98)
Transportation & Delivery Expenses
706,000.00 706,000.00 63,223.50 642,776.50
Subscription Expenses 50,000.00 50,000.00 226,200.05 (176,200.05) Professional Services 15,174,000.00 15,174,000.00 14,109,790.50 1,064,209.50
Legal Services 530,000.00 530,000.00 39,488.00 490,512.00
Auditing Services 32,313.89 (32,313.89)
General Services 4,396,000.00 4,396,000.00 2,856,369.70 1,539,630.30
Janitorial Services 4,535,000.00 4,535,000.00 2,636,661.03 1,898,338.97
Security Services 5,713,000.00 5,713,000.00 8,544,538.48 (2,831,538.48)
Other Professional Servcs. 419.40 (419.40)
Repairs and Maintenance Expense
1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,875,420.03 (375,420.03)
Leasehold Improvements 35,300.00 (35,300.00)
Office Building 26,929.90 (26,929.90)
Office Equipment 398,658.23 (398,658.23)
Furnitures/Fixtures 101,687.75 (101,687.75)
IT Equipment & Software 536,856.65 (536,856.65)
Motor Vehicle 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 760,817.00 739,183.00
Communication Equipment 15,170.50 (15,170.50)
Extraordinary Expenses 5,970,000.00 5,970,000.00 6,132,147.47 (162,147.47)
Miscellaneous Expenses 0.00 Taxes, Insurance Premiums and Other Fees
746,000.00 746,000.00 1,112,115.11 (366,115.11)
2012 NLRC Performance Report Page 22
Taxes, Duties & Licenses 66,811.08 (66,811.08)
Fidelity Bond Premiums 420,660.57 (420,660.57)
Insurance Expense 624,643.46 (624,643.46)
Other MOOE-C.N.A. 7,344,240.00 (7,344,240.00)
Other MOOE 534,669.61 (534,669.61)
Bank Charges 13,200.00 (13,200.00)
Sub-Total 113,489,000.00 116,666,160.00 114,728,412.57 1,937,747.43
Capital Outlays
Office Equipment
Motor Vehicle 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 1,774,584.00 25,416.00
IT Equipment & Software
Sub-Total 1,800,000.00 1,800,000.00 1,774,584.00 25,416.00
TOTAL - CURRENT YEAR 567,952,000.00 678,129,375.00 676,073,296.65 2,056,078.35
B. SPEC. PURPOSE FUNDS
Pension Gratuity Fund
Terminal Leave Benefits 29,542,513.00 29,635,430.59 (92,917.59)
Retirement Benefits-Civilian 64,735,533.00 64,735,530.30 2.70
TOTAL – SPF 0.00 94,278,046.00 94,370,960.89 (92,914.89)
C. CONTINUING APPRO.
Capital Outlay 8,996,481.00 0.00 8,996,481.00
Office Equipment 2,181,314.34 (2,181,314.34)
Furnitures and Fixtures 486,647.60 (486,647.60)
IT Equipment & Software 6,289,800.75 (6,289,800.75)
Other PPE 46,590.00 (46,590.00) TOTAL - CONT APPRO 0.00 8,996,481.00 9,004,352.69 (7,871.69)
GRAND TOTAL 567,952,000.00 781,403,902.00 779,448,610.23 1,955,291.77
-oOo-