part i. investigator insights emerging multikinase inhibitors in thyroid carcinoma dr. marcia brose...
TRANSCRIPT
Part I
Investigator Insights
Emerging Multikinase Inhibitors in Thyroid Carcinoma
Dr. Marcia Brose
Abramson Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania
MSB 09/21/09
MSB 05/30/09
Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Pathology
American Cancer Society. www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_is_thyroid_cancer_43.asp. Carling T and Uldesman R. Cancer of the Endocrine System.: Section 2: Thyroid Cancer. Principles of Clinical Oncology. 7th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2005.
Parafollicular cells
Follicular cells Differentiated
Anaplastic
Medullary
Papillary
Follicular
Hurtle Cell
Sporadic
Familial
US EU Japan
Estimated Thyroid Cancer Incidence in 2008
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
An
nu
al I
nci
den
ce
LA/C
~37,000~33,000
~18,000
~6,000
Global Incidence of Thyroid Cancer was > 212,000 in 20081
LA/C = Latin America and Caribbean.1. GLOBOCAN 2008, International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr/.2. Sherman. Lancet. 2003;361:501-511.3. Eustatia-Rutten et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:313-319.
• Thyroid cancer is the most common form of endocrine malignancy1
• DTC represents> 90% of all thyroid carcinomas2
• The prognosis of patients with DTC is generally good due to tumor biology and efficacy of the initial surgery and 131I therapy3
Dimensions of the problem
• Increasing in incidence– 95% sporadic or RT-induced, 5% familial
• 3.5 to 4:1 female to male gender distribution• > 95% of carcinomas arise from thyroid follicular
cells and are well-differentiated• Surgery +/- I-131 remains the standard of care
– Vast majority treated in this manner are cured• Emergence of Multiple TKIs in Iodine-Refractory
TC and MTC that can affect response and likely prolong PFS and OS
Thyroid Cancer in the United States
New Diagnosis Cancer Deaths
Pfister, D. Treatment of Radioactive Thyroid Cancer. Presentation. ASCO, 2007.
>5.0cm
2.1-5.0cm
Thyroid cancer in the United States
0-1.0cm
1.1-2.0cm
Davies, JAMA 2006295:2164
MSB 05/30/09
0 1084 62 12 14
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Surv
ival
Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
Stage IV
DTC: Initial Disease Stage Predicts OVERALL SURVIVAL
Years
75% of all
tumors
25% of all
tumors
p<0.001
Jonklaas J et al. Thyroid. 2006, 16(12): 1229-1242.
MSB 05/30/09
Thyroid Cancer: Treatment Strategy
• High Risk: (Age >45, male, metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, >4cm)– Total Thyroidectomy– RAI (131I) Ablation– TSH Suppression Therapy with Thyroid
Hormone– Follow Serial Thyroglobulin Levels (Tg)– XRT for recurrent local disease/positive margins– Surveillance: NeckUS, Tg, Neck MRI, Chest CT,
RAI Whole body scan, FDG-PET
TSH Suppression Improves Survival for DTC Patients With Metastases
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Su
rviv
al,
%
Years
All > 45 yr
TSH suppressed 15 yr 10 yrTSH unsuppressed 11 yr 6 yr
p < 0.01 p < 0.005
Mediann = 450
Jonklaas et al. Thyroid. 2006;16:1299-1242.
Su
rviv
al (
%)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Years after the discovery of metastases
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
1
2
3
127 patients4 cancer related deaths
168 patients
149 patients
Survival and Response to Treatment
• Group 1: initial 131I uptake and CR – Age < 40 years – Well-differentiated cancer – Small size of metastases
• Group 2: initial 131I uptake and persistent disease
• Group 3: no initial 131I uptake
Durante et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892-2899.
RAI-refractory disease• 25–50% of metastatic thyroid cancers lose
ability to take up iodine
• RAI refractory means that there are progressing lesions that do not take up RAI (Note: there may still be some that do)
• Loss of iodine uptake inversely correlates with survival
Cooper DS, et al. Thyroid. 2009;9:1176-214.Hodak SP, Carty SE. Oncology. 2009;23:775-6.
Mehra R, Cohen RB. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2008;22:1279-95,xi.
RAI-Refractory Thyroid Cancer• L-T4 treatment: serum
TSH < 0.1 mU/L• Local treatments when
needed: surgery, radiation, radiofrequency or cryoablation
• Imaging follow-up every6 months
• Stable disease: follow-up
• Progression:
– > 20% (RECIST) in6-15 months
– Inclusion in a trial • Chemotherapy: low efficacy, significant toxicity (eg, doxorubicin: 5% PR, 47% SD, median PFS 7 months)
• Targeted therapy as first line (ATA, 2009)
Cooper et al. Thyroid. 2009;9:1167-1214.
NCCN and ATA guidelines for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC)
Initial treatment• Total thyroidectomy, except in patients with unifocal microcarcinoma
(individualized to patient and extent of disease)1,2
Postoperative treatment • Radioactive iodine (131I) (RAI) therapy1,2
Follow-up treatment• Levothyroxine to suppress TSH levels to < 0.1mU/L1,2
Recurrent or metastatic disease treatment• Local therapy (re-operation, external radiation)• Systemic therapy
– RAI therapy– patients with refractory advanced disease
• chemotherapy (limited efficacy and considerable toxicity)1,2
• participation in clinical trials with small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended1,2
1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Thyroid Carcinoma V.1.2010. 2. Cooper DS, et al. Thyroid .2009;9:1167-214.
NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network.ATA = American Thyroid Association .
Thyroid Cancer is associated with aberrant cell signaling
Genetic Alteration PTC FTC
BRAF V600E 44% 0%
BRAF copy gain 3% 35%
RET/PTC (1 and 3) 20% 0%
RAS 8-10% 17-45%
PI3KCA mutations 3% 6%
PI3KCA copy gain 12% 28%
PTEN 2% 7%
Pax8/PPARγ 0% 35%
Total >70% >65%
MA
P K
inas
eP
I3K
/AK
T
Nikiforov, Mod Path, 2008, Xing Endocrine Rel Ca(2005), Wang et al, 2007
RAS/BRAF Mutations are More Prevalent in RAI Refractory Thyroid Cancer
MSB 09/21/09
Ricarte-Filho JC, Cancer Research 2009 Jun 1;69(11):4885-93
Cell signalling in differentiated thyroid cancer
Graphic adapted fromKeefe SM, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:778-83.
RET/PTC
• HIF1a• Inhibition of apoptosis• Migration
EGFR
PI3K
VEGFR-2
Endothelial Cell
• Migration• Angiogenesis
Ras
B-Raf
MEK
ERK
PI3K
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Ras
Raf
MEK
ERK
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Tumor Cell
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
Who is appropriate for kinase inhibitor therapy?
1. Patients whose tumors no longer take up radioactive iodine or who have exceeded their lifetime dose
2. Patients with disease measurable by exam or CT scan
3. Patients with >1 lesion which is >1 cm in size and who are symptomatic
4. Patients with progressive disease
MSB 09/21/09
Part II
Investigator Insights
Emerging Multikinase Inhibitors in Thyroid Carcinoma
Dr. Marcia Brose
Abramson Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania
MSB 09/21/09
Kinase Inhibitors
KIATP KI
PY Y
ATP
Activated pathway
Cancer
Activated Pathway Cancer
VEGFR inhibition
Tumor
angiogenesisTumor
growth
RET, BRAF….. inhibition
Graphic adapted fromKeefe SM, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:778-83.
MotesanibSorafenibSunitinibVandetanibXL-184
Axitinib MotesanibSorafenibSunitinibVandetanib
Vandetanib
Sorafenib Sorafenib
Targeting cell signalling in thyroid cancer
RET/PTC
• HIF1a• Inhibition of apoptosis• Migration
EGFR
PI3K
VEGFR-2
Endothelial Cell
• Migration• Angiogenesis
Ras
B-Raf
MEK
ERK
PI3K
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Ras
Raf
MEK
ERK
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Tumor Cell
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
EverolimusSirolimus
EverolimusSirolimus
Thyroid Cancer is associated with aberrant cell signaling
Genetic Alteration PTC FTC
BRAF V600E 44% 0%
BRAF copy gain 3% 35%
RET/PTC (1 and 3) 20% 0%
RAS 8-10% 17-45%
PI3KCA mutations 3% 6%
PI3KCA copy gain 12% 28%
PTEN 2% 7%
Pax8/PPARγ 0% 35%
Total >70% >65%
MA
P K
inas
eP
I3K
/AK
T
Nikiforov, Mod Path, 2008, Xing Endocrine Rel Ca(2005), Wang et al, 2007
UPCC 03305: Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Gupta-Abramson V, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4714–9
n=55
Eligibility criteria
• Metastatic, iodine refractory thyroid cancer
• Life expectancy >3 months
• Evidence of PD within 6 months of study entry
• ECOG 0–2
• Good organ and bone marrow function
Sorafenib400mg b.i.d.
Primary endpoints
• RECIST
• PFS
• Response rate
b.i.d. = twice daily; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; ULN = upper limit of normal
Update UPCC O3305: May 2009Results:
• Response for all 50 evaluable patients
– PR 36% (18 patients)
– SD 46% (23 patients)
– clinical benefit 82% (41 patients)
• Exact binomial confidence interval excludes the null hypothesis (p<0.0001)
• PFS is 63 weeks for all patients, and 84 weeks in patients with DTC
Brose M, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(May 20 Suppl.):301s (Abstract 6002)
UPCC 03305: Best Response in
46 Evaluable Patients
PapillaryFollicular/Hürthle CellMedullaryPoorly Differentiated/Anaplastic
302010
0–10–20–30–40–50–60–70–80–90–10
Ch
ang
e in
su
m o
f ta
rget
lesi
on
by
RE
CIS
Tco
mp
ared
to
bas
elin
e (%
)
PD SD PR
Best response of advanced thyroid cancer patients to sorafenib
Brose M, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(May 20 Suppl.):301s (Abstract 6002)
Cutaneous Adverse Events with Sorafenib in Thyroid Carcinoma Patients
1. Cutaneous toxicity peaks in the second cycle
2. Brief dose holidays and dose reductions are reasonable. Rash usually improves with continued sorafenib treatment
3. Rash is more common in patients with extensive sun exposure in the past
4. Skin creams may be used as well as NSAIDs for control of the pain from the rash MSB
09/21/09
Eligibility criteria• Locally advanced
or metastatic DTC• Progression
within 14 months • RAI refractory • No prior targeted
therapy, chemotherapy or thalidomide
Phase III Study of Sorafenib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Patients with Radioactive Iodine Refractory Thyroid Cancer
(DECISION) trial – Primary Endpoint POSITIVE• An International, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase III study
of sorafenib versus placebo in locally advanced/metastatic RAI-refractory DTC
www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT00984282
Offstudy
Disease progression
Crossover or continue
sorafenib 400mg orally b.i.d.
Ran
do
mis
atio
n (
1:1)
(n=
380)
ProgressionSorafenib
400mg orallyb.i.d.
Placebo
Investigator’s decisionn=190
n=190
Primary Endpoint:PFS (RECIST)Independent review
Secondary Endpoints:OS, TTP, RR, DCR, PRO, PKSafetyExploratory Biomarkers
Phase III DECISION Trial
• Over 400 patients enrolled in the trial world wide
• January 3, 2013 press release revealed that the primary endpoint of Progression Free Survival significantly favored the Sorafenib arm
• The final results of the study to be presented at a major meeting in 2013
MSB 09/21/09
Therapeutic Options beyond frontline TKI therapy
1. Single progressive lesions can be resected or irradiated and the frontline TKI continued
2. Minimally progressive lesions can often be observed on the original TKI as this disease frequently progresses very slowly
3. For patients progressing on a frontline TKI, an m-TOR inhibitor can be added to block the PI3K escape pathway
4. For disease progressing in multiple areas one might switch to another available TKI or a clinical trial with an investigational agent
MSB 09/21/09
Part III
MSB 09/21/09
Investigator Insights
Emerging Multikinase Inhibitors in Thyroid Carcinoma
Dr. Marcia Brose
Abramson Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania
MSB 09/21/09
Advanced Thyroid Cancer’s New Unmet Need:
Progression on Sorafenib/VEGFR2 inhibitor
• What to do with patients who progress but maintain good performance status
• Most patients respond to frontline TKI therapy but then progress in a new lesion or a subset of lesions
Targets of Kinase Inhibitors
Compound Name VEGFR BRAF PDGFR KIT RET Other
Sorafenib (Nexavar) + + + + + FLT-3
Sunitinib (Sutent) + + + FLT-3
Axitinib (AG-013736) + + +
Motesanib (AMG-706) + + + +Pazopanib(GW786034) + + +Vandetanib (Zactima) + + EGFR
Cabozotanib (XL184) + + C-MET
Lenvatinib(E7080) + + + + FGFR
MSB 05/30/09
Targeted Agents: Phase II Clinical DataDrug Key Baseline
Characteristicsn PFS
Months
PR SD PD
Sorafenib(Brose)
•DTC+ PDTC(90%), 47 20 38% 47% 2%
Sunitinib(Cohen)
• DTC (74%); MTC (26%)
51 - 17% DTC
74% DTC
9% DTC
Axitinib(Cohen)
•Papillary (50%); Medullary (18%); Follicular/Hurthle (25%/18%); Anaplastic (3%)
60 18.1 30% 48% 7%
Motesanib(Sherman)
•Papillary (61%); Follicular/Hurthle (34%)
93 10 14% 67% 8%
Pazopanib(Bible)
PD and DTC (Progression <6months)
37 12 49% - -
Lenvatinib(E7080, Sherman)
•DTC 100% 58 13.3 45% 46% 5%
Graphic adapted fromKeefe SM, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:778-83.
MotesanibSorafenibSunitinibVandetanibXL-184
Axitinib MotesanibSorafenibSunitinibVandetanib
Vandetanib
Sorafenib Sorafenib
Targeting cell signalling in thyroid cancer
RET/PTC
• HIF1a• Inhibition of apoptosis• Migration
EGFR
PI3K
VEGFR-2
Endothelial Cell
• Migration• Angiogenesis
Ras
B-Raf
MEK
ERK
PI3K
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Ras
Raf
MEK
ERK
AKT
mTOR
S6K
Tumor Cell
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
• Growth• Survival• Proliferation
EverolimusSirolimus
EverolimusSirolimus
UPCC 19309: Everolimus + Sorafenib for DTC patients who progress on
Sorafenib alone
n=35
Eligibility criteria
• Metastatic, iodine refractory thyroid cancer
• Life expectancy >3 months
• PD on sorafenib
• ECOG 0–2
• Good organ and bone marrow function
Sorafenib + Everolimus
Intra-patientDose escalation.
Primary endpoints
• RECIST
• PFS
• Response rate
b.i.d. = twice daily; RECIST = Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; ULN = upper limit of normal
22 patients accrued so far
Eligibility criteria:• Locally advanced
or metastatic DTC• Progression
within 14 months • RAI refractory
UPCC 18310: NO25530: An Open-Label, Multi-Center Phase II Study of the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib in
Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Papillary Thyroid Cancer (PTC) positive for the BRAF V600 Mutation and
Resistant to Radioactive Iodine
Vemurafenib960mg BID
Primary Endpoint:Best Overall response Rate (BORR) (RECIST 1.1) (Partial and complete RR) in sorafenib naïve ptsIndependent review
Secondary Endpoints:• PFS, TTP, OS, TTP, in
sorafenib naïve pts• BORR, CB, TTP, PFS and
OS, in soraefnib exposed patients
Info
rmed
Co
nse
nt
BR
AF
V60
0E t
esti
ng + First Line
Sorafenib Naïve (n=25)
Second Line Prior Sorafenib
(n=25)
+
MSB 10/16/10
Clinical Trials Ongoing for Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Compound Name DTC/MTC Status
Sorafenib (Nexavar) DTCFirst Line – International Phase III – Positive Study, Awaiting Data Presentation
Lenvatinib (E7080) DTC First and Second Line – Phase III
Vemurafenib (BRAF V600E inhibitor) DTC (PTC) First and Second Line Phase II – (Phase III?)
Everolimus+Sorafenib DTC Second Line – Phase II
Cabozantinib DTCFirst Line – Phase I complete First Line and Second Line Phase II– Pending
Pioglitazone (PPARγ) DTC (FTC*) First and Second Line - Phase II
Pazopanib (GW786034) DTC First and Second line – Phase II Done
Sunitinib (Sutent) DTC First line Phase II – Done.
Take Home Messages-I• Multiple VEGFR agents in DTC have activity that affect the vast
majority of patients with advanced RAI-refractory thyroid cancer needing therapy
• Results of phase III trial with sorafenib (DECISION) showing that patients treated with sorafenib have a longer progression free survival than those on placebo. We look forward to a future major oncology meeting for these results. Results from the Phase III trial of lenvatinib (SELECT ) are likely to follow in another year.
• Molecular markers (eg. BRAF V600E mutation) are newer targets being tested in Phase II clinical trials. If positive, patients will need routine molecular testing for these mutations
• Many studies for second line treatment of DTC are underway and now a primary focus of our research program at the Abramson Cancer Center and at other sites. These trials target new molecular mechanisms and hope to add to the success of the VEGFR inhibitors in this disease.
Take Home Messages-II
1. Patients with progressive RAI-refractory TC should be referred to an oncologist with access to all the available and investigational kinase inhibitors.
2. Treatment with a kinase inhibitor should be initiated in patients with progressive, measurable disease.
3. The physician managing these patients should be comfortable with and skilled in managing the adverse events related to kinase inhibitors.
4. Many clinical trials are now available for patients progressing on frontline kinase inhibitor therapy.
MSB 09/21/09
References1. Giuffrida D, Prestifilippo A, et al; Journal of Oncology Volume 2012,
Article ID-391629, “New Treatment in Advanced Thyroid Cancer”
2. Brose M, Nutting C, et al; BMC Cancer 2011, 11:349 “Rationale and design of DECISION: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, RAI-refractory, differentiated thyroid cancer”
3. Harris P, Bible K; Expert Opinion Investigational Drugs; October 2011 20(10): 1357-1375; “Emerging Therapeutics for Advanced Thyroid Malignancies: Rationale and Targeted Approaches”
4. Gupta-Abramson V, Troxel A, et al; JCO 2008 Vol. 26: 4714 “Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid Cancer”
5. Kojic K, Kojic S & Wiseman S; Expert Reviews in Anticancer Therapy 2012 Vol.12(3):345; “Differentiated thyroid cancers: a comprehensive review of novel targeted therapies
MSB 09/21/09