part 7 topics for further study. copyright © 2006 nelson, a division of thomson canada ltd. 21 the...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
2121The Theory of The Theory of
Consumer Choice Consumer Choice
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
● See how a budget constraint represents consumer choices
● Learn how indifference curves can be used to represent consumer preferences
● Analyze how a consumer’s optimal choices are determined
● See how a consumer responds to changes in income changes in prices
● Decompose the impact of a price change into an income effect and a substitution effect
● Apply the theory of consumer choice to four questions about consumer behaviour
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Questions addressed by the Questions addressed by the Theory of Consumer ChoiceTheory of Consumer Choice
● In this chapter, the theory you learn will be applied to three questions about household (consumer) decisions Do all demand curves slope downward? How do wages affect labor supply? How do interest rates affect household saving?
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE CONSUMER CONSUMER CAN AFFORDCAN AFFORD
●When choosing which goods to purchase, consumers face two constraints their income prices of the goods
●Each combination of goods purchased is called a consumption bundleconsumption bundle
●The budget constraintbudget constraint illustrates the limit on the consumption “bundles” that a consumer can afford. People consume less than they desire because their
spending is constrained.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE CONSUMER CONSUMER CAN AFFORDCAN AFFORD
●The budget constraintbudget constraint shows various combinations of goods the consumer can
afford given his or her income and the prices of the two
goods.
●Any point on the budget constraintbudget constraint lineline indicates the consumer’s combination or tradeoff between two goods.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
The Consumer’s Budget ConstraintThe Consumer’s Budget Constraint(Assume income=$1000)(Assume income=$1000)
Litres of Pepsi (Q)
Number of Pizzas (Q)
Spending on Pepsi (PxQ)
Spending on Pizza (PxQ) Total Spending
0 100 $ 0 $1,000 $1,000
50 90 100 900 1,000
100 80 200 800 1,000
150 70 300 700 1,000
200 60 400 600 1,000
250 50 500 500 1,000
300 40 600 400 1,000
350 30 700 300 1,000
400 20 800 200 1,000
450 10 900 100 1,000
500 0 1,000 0 1,000
Figure 1 The Consumer’s BudgetFigure 1 The Consumer’s Budget ConstraintConstraint
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Consumer’sbudget constraint
500B
100
A
Copyright©2004 South-Western
For example, if the consumer buys no pizzas, he can afford 500 litres of Pepsi (point B).
If he buys no Pepsi, he can afford 100 pizzas (point A).
For example, if the consumer buys no pizzas, he can afford 500 litres of Pepsi (point B).
If he buys no Pepsi, he can afford 100 pizzas (point A).
Figure 1 The Consumer’s Budget ConstraintFigure 1 The Consumer’s Budget Constraint
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Consumer’sbudget constraint
500B
250
50
C
100
A
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Alternately, the consumer can buy 50 pizzas and 250 litres of Pepsi
Alternately, the consumer can buy 50 pizzas and 250 litres of Pepsi
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT: WHAT THE CONSUMER CONSUMER CAN AFFORDCAN AFFORD
●The slopeslope of the budget constraint line equals the relative price of the two goods, that is, the price of one good compared to the price of
the other. Ppizza/PPepsi
● It measures the rate at which the consumer can trade one good for the other.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
PREFERENCES: PREFERENCES: WHAT THE CONSUMER WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTSWANTS
●A consumer’s preference among consumption bundles may be illustrated with indifferenceindifference curves.curves.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Representing Preferences Representing Preferences with Indifference Curveswith Indifference Curves
●An indifference curveindifference curve shows consumption bundles that give the consumer the same level of satisfaction.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s PreferencesFigure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Indifferencecurve, I1
I2
C
B
A
D
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Representing Preferences Representing Preferences with Indifference Curveswith Indifference Curves
●The Consumer’s PreferencesThe Consumer’s Preferences The consumer is indifferent, or equally happy, with the
combinations shown at points A, B, and C because they are all on the same curve.
●The Marginal Rate of SubstitutionThe Marginal Rate of Substitution The slope at any point on an indifference curve is the
marginal rate of substitutionmarginal rate of substitution.• It is the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good
for another.• It is the amount of one good that a consumer requires as
compensation to give up one unit of the other good.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s PreferencesFigure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Indifferencecurve, I1
I21
MRS
C
B
A
D
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Four Properties of Indifference CurvesFour Properties of Indifference Curves
●Higher indifference curves are preferred to lower ones.
● Indifference curves are downward sloping.● Indifference curves do not cross.● Indifference curves are bowed inward.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Four Properties of Indifference Curves Four Properties of Indifference Curves
●Property 1: Higher indifference curves are preferred to lower ones. Consumers usually prefer more of something to less. Higher indifference curves represent larger quantities
of goods than do lower indifference curves.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s PreferencesFigure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Indifferencecurve, I1
I2
C
B
A
D
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Four Properties of Indifference Curves Four Properties of Indifference Curves
●Property 2: Indifference curves are downward sloping. A consumer is willing to give up one good only if he or
she gets more of the other good in order to remain equally happy.
If the quantity of one good is reduced, the quantity of the other good must increase.
For this reason, most indifference curves slope downward.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s PreferencesFigure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Indifferencecurve, I1
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Four Properties of Indifference Curves Four Properties of Indifference Curves
●Property 3: Indifference curves do not cross. Points A and B should make the consumer equally
happy. Points B and C should make the consumer equally
happy. This implies that A and C would make the consumer
equally happy. But C has more of bothboth goods compared to A.
Figure 3 The Impossibility of Intersecting Indifference CurvesFigure 3 The Impossibility of Intersecting Indifference Curves
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
C
A
B
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Four Properties of Indifference Curves Four Properties of Indifference Curves
●Property 4: Indifference curves are bowed inward. People are more willing to trade away goods that they
have in abundance and less willing to trade away goods of which they have little.
These differences in a consumer’s marginal substitution rates cause his or her indifference curve to bow inward.
Figure 4 Bowed Indifference CurvesFigure 4 Bowed Indifference Curves
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Indifferencecurve
8
3
A
3
7
B
1
MRS = 6
1MRS = 14
6
14
2
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Two Extreme Examples of Indifference CurvesTwo Extreme Examples of Indifference Curves
●Perfect substitutes●Perfect complements
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Two Extreme Examples of Indifference Two Extreme Examples of Indifference Curves Curves
●Perfect SubstitutesPerfect Substitutes Two goods with straight-line indifference curves are
perfect substitutes. The marginal rate of substitution is a fixed number.
Figure 5 Perfect Substitutes and Perfect ComplementsFigure 5 Perfect Substitutes and Perfect Complements
Dimes0
Nickels
(a) Perfect Substitutes
I1 I2 I3
3
6
2
4
1
2
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Two Extreme Examples of Indifference Curves Two Extreme Examples of Indifference Curves
●Perfect ComplementsPerfect Complements Two goods with right-angle indifference curves are
perfect complements.
Figure 5 Perfect Substitutes and Perfect ComplementsFigure 5 Perfect Substitutes and Perfect Complements
Right Shoes0
LeftShoes
(b) Perfect Complements
I1
I2
7
7
5
5
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
OPTIMIZATION: What the Consumer ChoosesOPTIMIZATION: What the Consumer Chooses
●Consumers want to get a combination of goods on the highest possible indifference curve.
●However, the consumer must also end up on or below his budget constraint.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
The Consumer’s Optimal ChoicesThe Consumer’s Optimal Choices
●Combining the indifference curve and the budget constraint determines the consumer’s optimal choice.
●Consumer optimum occurs at the point where the highest indifference curve and the budget constraint are tangent.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
The Consumer’s Optimal ChoiceThe Consumer’s Optimal Choice
●The consumer chooses consumption of the two goods so that the marginal rate of substitution marginal rate of substitution equals the relative priceequals the relative price.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
TheThe Consumer’s Optimal Choice Consumer’s Optimal Choice
●At the consumer’s optimum, the consumer’s valuation of the two goods equals the market’s valuation.
Figure 6 The Consumer’s OptimumFigure 6 The Consumer’s Optimum
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Budget constraint
I1
I2
I3
Optimum
AB
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
How Changes in Income Affect How Changes in Income Affect Consumer’s ChoicesConsumer’s Choices
●An increase in income shifts the budget constraint outward. The consumer is able to choose a better combination
of goods on a higher indifference curve.
Figure 7 An Increase in IncomeFigure 7 An Increase in Income
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
New budget constraint
I1
I2
2. . . . raising pizza consumption . . .
3. . . . andPepsiconsumption.
Initialbudgetconstraint
1. An increase in income shifts thebudget constraint outward . . .
Initialoptimum
New optimum
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
How Changes in Income Affect How Changes in Income Affect Consumer’s Choices Consumer’s Choices
●Normal versus Inferior Goods If a consumer buys more of a good when his or her
income rises, the good is called a normal goodnormal good. If a consumer buys less of a good when his or her
income rises, the good is called an inferior goodinferior good..
Figure 8 An Inferior GoodFigure 8 An Inferior Good
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Initialbudgetconstraint
New budget constraint
I1I2
1. When an increase in income shifts thebudget constraint outward . . .
2. . . . pizza consumption rises, making pizza a normal good . . .
Initialoptimum
New optimum
Copyright©2004 South-Western
3. . . . But Pepsi consumption falls, because Pepsi is an inferior good
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
How Changes in Prices Affect Consumer’s How Changes in Prices Affect Consumer’s ChoicesChoices
●A fall in the price of any good rotates the budget constraint outward and changes the slope of the budget constraint.
Figure 9 A Change in PriceFigure 9 A Change in Price
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
1,000 D
500 B
100
A
I1
I2
Initial optimum
New budget constraint
Initialbudgetconstraint
1. A fall in the price of Pepsi rotates the budget constraint outward . . .
3. . . . andraising Pepsiconsumption.
2. . . . reducing pizza consumption . . .
New optimum
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Income and Substitution EffectsIncome and Substitution Effects
●A price change has two effects on consumption. An income effect A substitution effect
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Income and Substitution EffectsIncome and Substitution Effects
●The Income EffectIncome Effect the change in consumption that results when a price
change moves the consumer to a higher or lower indifference curve.
●The Substitution EffectSubstitution Effect the change in consumption that results when a price
change moves the consumer along an indifference curve to a point with a different marginal rate of substitution.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Income and Substitution EffectsIncome and Substitution Effects
●A Change in Price: Substitution EffectSubstitution Effect: a price change first causes the
consumer to move from one point on an indifference curve to another on the same curve.• Illustrated by movement from point A to point B.
Income EffectIncome Effect: after moving from one point to another on the same curve, the consumer will move to another indifference curve.• Illustrated by movement from point B to point C.
Figure 10 Income and Substitution EffectsFigure 10 Income and Substitution Effects
Quantityof Pizza
Quantityof Pepsi
0
I1
I2
A
Initial optimum
New budget constraint
Initialbudgetconstraint
Substitutioneffect
Substitution effect
Incomeeffect
Income effect
B
C New optimum
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Table 1 Table 1 Income and Substitution Effects When the Price of Pepsi FallsIncome and Substitution Effects When the Price of Pepsi Falls
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
Deriving the Demand CurveDeriving the Demand Curve
●A consumer’s demand curve can be viewed as a summary of the optimal decisions that arise from his or her budget constraint and indifference curves.
Figure 11 Deriving the Demand CurveFigure 11 Deriving the Demand Curve
Quantityof Pizza
0
Demand
(a) The Consumer’s Optimum’
Quantityof Pepsi
0
Price ofPepsi
(b) The Demand Curve for Pepsi
Quantityof Pepsi
250
$2A
750
1B
I1
I2
New budget constraint
Initial budget constraint
750 B
250A
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THREE APPLICATIONSTHREE APPLICATIONS
●Do all demand curves slope downward? Demand curves can sometimes slope upward. This happens when a consumer buys more of a good
when its price rises. Giffen goodsGiffen goods
• Economists use the term Giffen good to describe a good that violates the law of demand.
• Giffen goods are goods for which an increase in the price raises the quantity demanded.
• The income effect dominates the substitution effect. • They have demand curves that slope upwards.
Figure 12 A Giffen GoodFigure 12 A Giffen Good
Quantityof Meat
Quantity ofPotatoes
0
I2
I1
Initial budget constraint
New budgetconstraint
D
A
B
2. . . . which increasespotatoconsumptionif potatoesare a Giffengood.
Optimum with lowprice of potatoes
Optimum with highprice of potatoes
E
C1. An increase in the price ofpotatoes rotates the budgetconstraint inward . . .
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THREE APPLICATIONSTHREE APPLICATIONS
●How do wages affect labor supply? If the substitution effect is greater than the income
effect for the worker, he or she works more. If income effect is greater than the substitution effect,
he or she works less.
Figure 13 The Work-Leisure DecisionFigure 13 The Work-Leisure Decision
Hours of Leisure0
Consumption
$5,000
100
I3
I2
I1
Optimum
2,000
60
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Figure 14 An Increase in the WageFigure 14 An Increase in the Wage
Hours ofLeisure
0
Consumption
(a) For a person with these preferences . . .
Hours of LaborSupplied
0
Wage
. . . the labor supply curve slopes upward.
I1
I2BC2
BC1
2. . . . hours of leisure decrease . . . 3. . . . and hours of labor increase.
1. When the wage rises . . .
Labor supply
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Figure 14 An Increase in the WageFigure 14 An Increase in the Wage
Hours ofLeisure
0
Consumption
(b) For a person with these preferences . . .
Hours of LaborSupplied
0
Wage
. . .the labor supply curve slopes backward.
I1
I2
BC2
BC1
1. When the wage rises . . .
2. . . . hours of leisure increase . . . 3. . . . and hours of labor decrease.
Labor supply
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
THREE APPLICATIONSTHREE APPLICATIONS
●How do interest rates affect household saving? If the substitution effect of a higher interest rate is
greater than the income effect, households save more. If the income effect of a higher interest rate is greater
than the substitution effect, households save less. Thus, an increase in the interest rate could either
encourage or discourage saving
Figure 15 The Consumption-Saving DecisionFigure 15 The Consumption-Saving Decision
Consumptionwhen Young
0
Consumptionwhen Old
$110,000
100,000
I3
I2
I1
Budgetconstraint
55,000
$50,000
Optimum
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Figure 16 An Increase in the Interest RateFigure 16 An Increase in the Interest Rate
0
(a) Higher Interest Rate Raises Saving (b) Higher Interest Rate Lowers Saving
Consumptionwhen Old
I1
I2
BC1
BC2
0
I1I2
BC1
BC2
Consumptionwhen Old
Consumptionwhen Young
1. A higher interest rate rotatesthe budget constraint outward . . .
1. A higher interest rate rotatesthe budget constraint outward . . .
2. . . . resulting in lowerconsumption when young and, thus, higher saving.
2. . . . resulting in higherconsumption when youngand, thus, lower saving.
Consumptionwhen Young
Copyright©2004 South-Western
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
SummarySummary
●A consumer’s budget constraintbudget constraint shows the possible combinations of different goods he can buy given his income and the prices of the goods.
●The slope of the budget constraintslope of the budget constraint equals the relative price of the goods.
●The consumer’s indifference curvesindifference curves represent his preferences.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
SummarySummary
●Points on higher indifference curves are preferred to points on lower indifference curves.
●The slope of an indifference curve at any point is the consumer’s marginal rate of substitutionmarginal rate of substitution.
●The consumer optimizes by choosing the point on his budget constraint that lies on the highest indifference curve.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
SummarySummary
●When the price of a good falls, the impact on the consumer’s choices can be broken down into an income effectincome effect and a substitution effect.substitution effect. The income effectincome effect is the change in consumption that
arises because a lower price makes the consumer better off.
The income effect is reflected by the movement from a lower to a higher indifference curve.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd.
SummarySummary
●The substitution effectsubstitution effect is the change in consumption that arises because a price change encourages greater consumption of the good that has become relatively cheaper.
●The substitution effect is reflected by a movement along an indifference curve to a point with a different slope.
Copyright © 2006 Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd. 6 Supply, Demand, and Government Policies
EUROPE Continental Flair Part IV. Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 2
Hawaii Paradise Found Chapter 10. Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 2
1 Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Chapter14 Education by Ian Gomme