parks facilities strategy · the city of armadale’s parks facilities strategy aims to strengthen...

32
City of Armadale 1 Parks Facilities Strategy 2019

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 1

Parks Facilities Strategy2019

Page 2: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 3

Executive Summary

Overview

The Park’s Facilities Strategy is intended to address the diverse community needs and expectations through the appropriate provision of space, form and infrastructure ensuring parks and facilities are planned and allocated accordingly, whoever the provider, manager or deliverer of the facility service might be. This document provides an assessment framework to guide the provision of public open space and infrastructure by establishing a hierarchy of parks based on their size, function and infrastructure, founded on existing City of Armadale provision and benchmarked externally.

The Parks Facilities Strategy aligns with the following actions in the City’s Corporate Business Plan:

1.1.1 Provide opportunities to connect individuals to each other and the wider community2.2.1 Deliver attractive and functional streetscapes, open spaces, City buildings and facilities2.2.2 Protect and enhance the character of the City’s spaces and places2.2.3 Revitalise existing neighbourhoods whilst retaining the character of places

2.3.2 Ensure maintenance activities address required levels of service

The document should be read and used in conjunction with the City’s Community Infrastructure Plan, relevant Developer Contribution Scheme reports and the following key external documents:

• Classification Framework for Public Open Space (Department of Sport and Recreation)

• Liveable Neighbourhoods (Western Australian Planning Commission)

• State Planning Policy 3.6 Development Contributions for Infrastructure (Western Australian Planning Commission)

The Parks Facilities Strategy, when used with these other documents, provides direction for the overall provision of parks; the scale of those parks, and the distribution and frequency with which various elements and functionalities as described in this document, should be included in parks designs.

This evidence based approach will help direct and maximise the use of current resources and funding, to meet the requirements of the community, now and into the future.

The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure.

Page 3: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 54

Introduction Definitions Context Process

Benchmarking Classification System Existing Public Open Space Provision Existing Park Facilities Provision City of Armadale Standards Typical Public Open Space Typical Facilities

Analysis Like for Like Comparison Facility Score Suburb Averages

Improvements Gaps for Consideration Park Improvement Plan A Note on Funding

Conclusion

6

10

17

36

42

46

Date Revision Comments 2013 A2018 B Revised JAM2019 C Issued for website

Parks Facilities Strategy Contents

Draft

Page 4: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 7

What is

City of Armadale (CoA)

Parks Facility Strategy (PFS)

Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (DLGSC)

Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER).

West Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)

Classification Framework for Public Open Space (DLGSC Classification)

Parks Improvement Plan (PIP)

Disability and Access Inclusion Plan (DAIP)

Public Open Space (POS)• Council owned or managed land used as

public parks and reserves and usually zoned ‘Reserve for Recreation’ or ‘Reserve for Recreation and Drainage’

Definitions

The PFS has been prepared to contribute to the development of sustainable communities through the quality planning, design and construction of POS in the CoA.

Where POS was once considered primarily as a site for sport and recreation, POS is now expected to contribute to a range of recreation, sport and environmental functions. POS is required to provide spaces for sport, physical activity, children’s play, relaxation, social interaction, community facilities along with WSUD, conserving nature, provide wildlife corridors and enhance the visual amenity of the landscape.

The trend toward higher density development and decreasing private open space is placing new expectations on the role of POS, raising issues for local and regional planners, community facility managers, parks managers and others concerned with securing the sustainability of urban environments.

The creation and implementation of the PFS will guide the creation, implementation and management of sustainable POS by:

Informing the equitable provision of POS: • This strategy provides guidance by

establishing a hierarchy of parks based on their classification and function

• Informs a base line in which future POS is considered against existing provision

• The document provides a standardisation of infrastructure in association with the hierarchy and function of each individual park

Guiding the improvement of POS:

• Inform the provision of new infrastructure • Inform the upgrade and renewal of existing

infrastructure • Provide a process to assess the

appropriateness of infrastructure requests from the community

It is therefore important to set a baseline for consideration in the development of future residential estates and tracking population infill. This will determine gaps in physical provision of space, which can accelerate asset condition deterioration and increase renewal rates based on increased wear and tear.

Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD)• A land planning and engineering design

approach which integrates the urban water cycle, including stormwater, groundwater and wastewater management and water supply, into urban design to minimise environmental degradation and improve aesthetic and recreational appeal

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)• A multi-disciplinary approach to deterring

criminal behaviour through environmental design

Introduction

Page 5: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 98

Context

The City is located on the urban fringe of the Perth Metropolitan Area and it is one of a number of outer metropolitan growth councils.

The City is experiencing sustained rapid growth. In 2016, the population was forecast to increase from 87,000 to 120,000 by 2026, reaching 145,000 by 2036.

Development across the City has been undertaken over a number of decades and as such the suburbs can be summarised into three precincts with similar features, environmental conditions and development time frames:

• Developing Suburbs ~6,900ha• Older Established Suburbs ~3,000ha• The Hills ~ 46,000ha

Research has been undertaken by Forecast.id to predict the City’s growth up to 2036. It is anticipated that the precincts are going to increase in population by the following percentages:

• Developing 223% • Older Established 24%• Hills 8%

Hills h8%

Developing h223%

Older h24%

Process

The PFS was first developed in 2013. The original document outlined the hierarchy of parks and infrastructure types and also identified a facility matrix to determine the most suitable facilities within each type of park.

The revised strategy provides an update on these key items in particular amending the hierarchy of POS to reflect state government acknowledged POS classifications and updating the facility matrix accordingly.

In developing the revised PFS, extensive desktop analysis was undertaken including:

• Comparing POS form and function across the City and against external Liveable Neighbourhood and DLGSC guidelines to determine a typical standard

• Comparing facilities across similar POS types to identify an average provision for each classification

• Comparing like for like across suburbs to identify gaps and prioritise improvements

This extensive desktop analysis has led to the development of an improvement plan to promote and prioritise the upgrade of POS.

• EXTERNAL CLASSIFICATIONS • EXISTING CITY PROVISION

• COMPARE LIKE FOR LIKE• IDENTIFY GAPS

• PRIORITIES

TYPICAL STANDARD

ANALYSIS

PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN

BENCHMARKING

Page 6: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 1110

Classification System

The DLGSC has created a Classification Framework for POS (DLGSC Classification) which is being adopted into Liveable Neighbourhoods to guide the size and type of POS provided at the planning stage. The PFS adopts these classifications.

Under the DLGSC Classification Framework, parks are separated into park categories based on the size, intended function, provision of infrastructure and distance users have to travel to visit the site.

The standard park categories are as follows:

District Open Space (DOS) DOS is principally designed to provide for organised formal sport and will generally include recreation space and some nature space. These areas serve several neighbourhoods, with players and visitors travelling from surrounding districts.

DOS can also have significant conservation and/or environmental features.

These spaces average 5ha to 15ha in size.

Neighbourhood Open Space (NOS) NOS serves as the recreational and social focus of a greater community. NOS may include a combination of open parkland and bushland with activity spaces for casual play and informal sports.

These spaces average 1ha to 5ha in size.

In addition to the above categories, the City notes two additional classifications; Regional Open Space (ROS) and Public Access Way (PAW). These two classifications are noted below, however due to the variable form and function of these spaces, the classification has not been further expanded within the PFS.

Local Open Space (LOS) LOS is small parklands that service the requirements of the residential population within the immediate area. Activities within LOS can include children’s play, picnicking, dog walking and cycling.

These spaces average 0.4ha to 1ha in size.

Regional Open Space (ROS) ROS includes recreation and organised sport spaces, as well as having significant conservation and/or environmental features. ROS provides substantial facilities for organised sport, play, social interaction and relaxation.

ROS serves one or more geographical regions and is likely to attract visitors from outside the immediate local government area.

ROS are highly specialised spaces.

Public Access Way (PAW)It is acknowledged not all POS will fit into the DLGSC categories; in particular they do not cater for streetscapes, drainage corridors or public access ways. As such the City has noted an additional category Public Access Way.

It is also important to note the DLGSC guidelines are developed in consideration of parkland in areas of high population density. The City manages many parks within a diverse population density.

Benchmarking

The primary function of an open space influences the range of facilities that could be provided. In general the primary functions comprise of :

Recreation Spaces Provide a setting for informal play and physical activity, relaxation and social interaction. These spaces include open parklands, community gardens, corridor links, amenity spaces, community use facilities, civic commons and squares.*

Sports SpacesProvide a setting for formal structured sporting activities. People attend sports spaces with the purpose of engaging in organised sporting activity, training/competition or viewing.*

Nature Spaces Provide a setting where people can enjoy nearby nature and protect local biodiversity and natural area values. Nature spaces provide opportunity for low impact recreational activities such as walking, cycling, picnicking, playing and watching or exploring natural features. These areas include bushland, coastal areas, wetlands, geological and natural features.*

Some parks will feature one or all of these functions however usually one function will be dominant.

* As noted in the DLGSC Classification Framework for Public Open Space November 2012.

Page 7: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 12

The PFS has adopted the DLGSC Classification system and has grouped all existing POS accordingly.

The City currently maintains 365 individual parks, reserves or PAWs with various primary functions:

16 Regional Open Spaces 16 District Open Spaces45 Neighbourhood Open Spaces 234 Local Open Spaces 54 Public Access Ways

Overall, Regional Open Space comprises the largest area to be maintained; followed by Local Open Space.

By function, the City currently manages 193 parks with a primary nature function, 17 sport spaces and 156 recreation spaces. Overall the ‘nature’ based function comprises the highest percentage of the total parks areas.

Comparison was also undertaken between suburbs for NOS, DOS and LOS, comparing POS type by size and per capita resident. By area DOS nature sites are the largest on average and LOS recreation the smallest.

It is important to note, due to the variance in historical town planning, surrounding environmental characteristics and population density, the distribution of POS within the CoA in regard to size and distribution can vary.

This comparison provides a guideline for the average POS, setting an average size and average ratio per resident and providing a basis to determine average provision of infrastructure per classification.

Average - Function

DOS Sport Recreation Nature

NOS Sport Recreation Nature

LOS Recreation Nature

% Function by total size (hectares) % Function by total number

Sport

Recreation

Nature

Sport

Recreation

Nature

Recreation

Nature

Sport

Recreation

Nature

Sport

Recreation

Nature

Recreation

Nature

Average - Form and Allocation

Function DLSC size

CoA Average size

m2/Resident 2016

No. Residents per Park

DO

S

Sport 5-15HA 8.4ha 9.5 8744Recreation 2.1ha 0.5 43719Nature 9.3ha 4.2 21859

NO

S

Sport 1-5HA 5.0ha 2.3 21859Recreation 2.4ha 10.0 2363Nature 3.4ha 1.6 21859

LOS Recreation 0.4-1HA 0.8ha 7.2 1150

Nature 1.3ha 23.2 553

Existing POS Classification

Page 8: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 14

Existing Facilities Provision A range of facilities are generally provided in a POS in order to enable the intended function. These facilities can vary from basic coverage of planting and turf, to specialist items such as BBQs, playgrounds and shade sails.

The development of facilities can be funded by Council capital allocation or grant funding, or by negotiation with developers at the development stage.

The following table demonstrates the percentage of parks which feature each facility in each classification. For example, 86% of NOS recreation sites feature playgrounds whilst 0% of DOS nature sites feature playgrounds.

Sporting or recreational classifications have the highest provision of facilities overall whilst nature classifications have the lowest provision of facilities overall.

This provides a baseline to develop a typical standard for each classification.

Pathways

Bridges

Signage

Car Parking

Access Control

Lighting

Play

Bin

Dog Bin

Seating

Shelter

Public Toilet

BBQ

Drink Fountain

Shade Sails

Art

Hard Courts

Fitness

Youth

Community Garden

Men's Shed

Dog Park

Irrigation

Trees

Planting

Scheduled Sports

Kickabout Turf

WSUD

DOS

Spor

t 90

090

100

100

9080

9040

100

7030

5050

100

9030

00

010

100

100

8010

010

013

Rec

reat

ion

100

5050

5010

010

010

010

00

100

100

100

5010

010

010

050

00

00

010

010

010

00

100

50

Nat

ure

250

100

2510

00

00

050

250

00

00

00

00

00

2510

010

025

050

NOS

Spor

t 10

00

100

100

100

7510

010

050

100

7575

025

750

100

050

00

010

010

010

010

010

025

Rec

reat

ion

9538

8157

8951

8676

4386

598

4135

1922

3219

53

00

5997

760

8662

Nat

ure

100

5025

5010

050

2550

2575

250

00

250

00

00

00

7510

010

00

7510

0

LOS

Rec

reat

ion

8622

5128

6621

4235

1057

190

118

47

114

00

00

6695

670

2843

Nat

ure

419

2911

474

14

215

10

11

03

00

00

00

1997

820

4044

Aver

age

Faci

litie

s Pr

ovis

ion

%

This

tabl

e de

mon

stra

tes

the

perc

enta

ge o

f par

ks w

hich

feat

ure

each

faci

lity

in e

ach

clas

sific

atio

n.

Page 9: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 17

CoA Standard

The following section illustrates the typical CoA standard as determined through the benchmarking phase.

The following section features:

• Visual representations of each of the classifications demonstrating typical size, form and associated infrastructure

• Standard specification of each facility item• The Facilities Matrix, which is a summary table of the infrastructure typically included, excluded or

considered on a case by case basis

The typical size stated is the average size within the City of Armadale.

DOS - Typical Recreation

Typical CoA Size: 2.1HaTypical CoA Form: Square

Typically includes:1. Extensive playground node 2. Extensive picnic node3. Off street carparking4. Public toilets 5. Irrigation, kick-about turf and

trees 6. Lighting 7. Shade sails

1

2

76

Can include: 8. Youth9. Community garden 10. Men’s shed 11. Dog park12. Fitness

3

Typical Examples

Page 10: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 1918

DOS -Typical Sport Typical CoA Size: 8.4HaCoA Preferred Size: 10.7HaTypical CoA Form: Square or Rectangular

Typically includes:1. A 4.8Ha flat turf area which allows for either

2 x senior size AFL or 2 x senior size soccer fields with minimum floodlighting to a training standard for the predominant sport

2. Large playground node 3. Large picnic node4. Extensive off street carparking5. Sporting pavilion with two change rooms per

sporting field and public toilets 6. Irrigation, kick-about turf and trees 7. Fitness

Can include:8. Shade structures 9. Youth spaces 10. Community garden 11. Men’s shed 12. Dog park

DOS - Typical Nature Typical CoA Size: 9.3HaTypical CoA Form: As per natural land

Typically includes:1. Off street carparking2. Access control 3. Signage 4. Seating

Can include: 5. Water sensitive urban design6. Bridge/board-walks

1

5

1

7

10

4

2-3

2

3

3

6

4

1

Page 11: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 2120

NOS -Typical Sport Typical CoA Size: 5.0HaCoA Preferred Size: 6.6HaTypical CoA Form: Square or Rectangular

Typically includes:1. A 2.9Ha flat turf area which allows for either

soccer or senior AFL 2. Playground node 3. Picnic node4. Off street carparking5. Irrigation, kick-about turf and trees 6. Fitness

7. Lighting - minimum floodlighting to a training standard for the predominant sport

8. Sporting pavilion with two change rooms per sporting field

Can include: 9. Youth spaces10. Community garden 11. Men’s shed 12. Dog park13. Public toilet

NOS -Typical Recreation

NOS -Typical Nature

Typical CoA Size: 2.4HaTypical CoA Form: Square

Typically includes:1. Large playground node2. Large picnic node3. Road side carparking4. Irrigation, kick-about turf and trees

Can include: 5. Shade structures6. Youth spaces 7. Fitness8. Off street carparking9. Public toilet

Typical CoA Size: 3.4HaTypical CoA Form: As per natural land

Typically includes:1. Pathways2. Access control 3. Signage 4. Seating 5. Trees and planting

Can include: 6. Water sensitive urban design 7. Bridges

5

7

8

96

4

2-3

1

1-2

3

4

3

4 52

1

7

Page 12: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 2322

LOS - Typical Recreation

LOS - Typical Nature

Typical CoA Size: 0.8HaTypical Form: Square

Typically includes:1. Pathways2. Access control3. Playground node 4. Seating node5. Irrigation, kick-about turf and trees

Can include: 6. Bridges

Typical CoA Size: 1.3HaTypical Form: Linear

Typically includes:1. Pathways2. Access control 3. Seating 4. Trees and planting

Can include: 5. Water sensitive urban design 6. Bridges

The following pages outline the facilities which are currently featured or considered within the City’s parks and identifies parameters to be considered accordingly.

Facilities -Typical

PathwaysPathways serve the purpose of providing a safe passageway for pedestrians, park users, cyclists and residents. They allow people to move throughout the POS and can connect with other neighbourhood facilities including schools, playgrounds and transport.

Pathways can also serve as boundaries between turf and environmentally sensitive areas.

Paths provide disability access and are age and family friendly. This allows POS to be available for all users, in line with the City’s Disability and Access Inclusion Plan (DAIP).

Specifications for pathways include the following:

• Concrete, unit paving or asphalt to Australian Standards for Design for Access and Mobility

• Material of the pathway should consider the predominate use - running, cycling etc

• Conform to the City’s minimum standard footpath detail, available on the City’s website- https://www.armadale.wa.gov.au/standard-drawings

Pedestrian Bridges and Boardwalks Pedestrian bridges are incorporated into the landscape to provide a physical link between pathways, where waterways or sensitive bushland pose an obstacle for continued access.

Bridges and boardwalks are a high value asset item and the provision of bridges shall be conditional within local and neighbourhood POS, located only where alternative pathways cannot physically be provided.

Specifications for bridges include the following:

• Utilise timber alternatives such as composite or concrete decking

• Structural support shall be concrete piles, no metal or timber work below the 1:5yr top of water level

• Local hardwood timber will be considered within handrails and as a structural timber

• Meet Australian Standards for Design for Access and Mobility

• Building Code of Australia • Provide a kick rail or balustrade as per

Building Code of Australia requirements

5

5

3-4

2

23

3

1

1

4

Page 13: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 2524

SignageSignage can serve several different functions including but not limited to; park identification signs, facility identification signs, directional signs, wayfinding signs, information signs, interpretative signs and regulatory and safety signs.

Signage shall provide clear, effective information and direction for people to find their way around, encouraging learning experiences and communicating park policies and rules.

Specifications for signage include the following: • Signage shall conform to the City’s corporate

style guide, available on request • Signage may require City of Armadale

Planning Approval. Contact the City of Armadale to ascertain requirements associated with signage approval

TransportCar park design shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified engineer with early input from a landscape architect to ensure there is a coordinated approach with the site layout.

Trees are an essential component of any carpark design and shall be considered early in the design process. Trees provide long term shade and assist in reducing the harsh visual impact often associated with carparks.

The carpark design shall also include a consideration of drainage requirements, including connections into stormwater and water sensitive urban design requirements.

Specifications for carparking include the following:

• Meet Australian Standards for parking facilities• Meet Australian Standards for Design for

Access and Mobility (latest edition)• Parallel parking – 1 tree per 3 parallel bays,

runs of parallel bays greater than 3 will generally not be supported

• Standard off-street parking area – 1 tree per 4 bays is required (this may be increased depending on the design of the carpark)

• Sporting POS requires a minimum 1 car bay per 4 senior players

Bike parking should be considered in all parks to encourage people to arrive by bike.

Access Management Access management endeavours to ensure that parks are conserved for community usage and not impacted by prohibited access (e.g. cars, motorbikes or other motorised vehicles and activities).

Access management is often a requirement within WAPC approvals for POS within new developments. In the case of existing facilities, the City assesses access management on a case by case basis.

Specifications for access management include the following:

• Bollards (composite or painted timber) or post and rail or other suitable fence types around the perimeter of all POS

• Maintenance access with a concrete crossover and boom gate (or removable bollards) shall generally be provided at agreed access points

• Conservation fencing around the perimeter of POS with a nature function

• 1.2m high chain-link fencing around the perimeter of POS with a sporting function

• POS may not be fenced or bollarded where emergency access is required for fire management

• Access control needs to be considered for emergency or event applications, ensuring allowance for a safe route

LightingLighting provides a safer environment for park users and also allows for extended use of sporting facilities, particularly during the winter months.

Lighting within POS areas shall be considered on a case by case basis as it is not always necessary to provide POS usage beyond daylight hours.

Specifications for Lighting include the following:

• Within recreational POS or public access ways lights shall be installed on poles with preference given to the use of sustainable and vandal proof lighting to Australian Standards for passive lighting

• Within District and Regional Sporting POS, lights shall be designed in accordance to Australian Standard LUX requirements for varying sports training standards

Page 14: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 2726

PlaygroundsPlaygrounds should be relevant to the intended function and classification of the park. For example, ROS and DOS areas may feature a range of challenging play spaces, targeting all age groups and abilities, whereas NOS and LOS areas may feature a smaller playground reflective of the requirements of the local area.

Specifications for playground include the following:

• Equipment to be located within one general area

• Seating and connecting pathways to be adjacent to each playground

• Shade options including natural (trees/greenstock) and constructed options (shade sail and shelters)

• Playground design and softfall shall be compliant with Australian Standards; softfall shall be pinebark mulch, rubber or white washed sand with a hardscape edge (e.g. pathway or kerbing)

• Disability inclusion and sensory play shall be considered for all playgrounds

• A diverse range of play opportunities which cater for a range of interactive activities including climbing, balancing etc

• A diverse range of play styles including nature play or structured play (nature play is defined as loose parts play and modifiable environments)

BinsRubbish bins are considered on a case by case basis and are to be located in areas that are heavily frequented by picnickers, in association with BBQ facilities or other functions which may generate a significant amount of waste.

Specifications for bins include the following:

• 120L or 240L plastic wheelie style bins are preferable

• Bins shall be enclosed in a metal bin enclosure where practicable

• Located on a concrete hard-stand or equal• Alternative metal bin types will be considered

where they fit into the local theme.

Dog BinsDog bins will be considered for installation on a site by site basis and/or as driven by community needs from time to time.

Dog bins are installed in dedicated dog exercise areas. Dog waste bags can be attached to general waste bins within NOS or DOS sites where dogs are permitted to access the park.

Specifications for bins include the following:

• 120L or 240L plastic wheelie style bins are preferable

• Bins shall be enclosed in a metal bin enclosure where practicable

• Located on a concrete hard-stand or equal• Alternative metal bin types will be considered

where they fit into the local theme• Bins shall be located where they can be easily

accessed by maintenance staff• Dog waste disposal bags shall be stored in

a metal dispenser mounted on to bin pole or separate pole

SeatingStrategically placed park seating may be placed in areas within the POS for quiet contemplation, viewing or as a gathering space. Seats also provide space to eat within a picnic or shelter node as well as a convenient resting point near playground areas to allow for supervision.

Seating is generally considered for use in parks adjacent to active and passive play areas and along paths. The majority of public open spaces shall include seating.

Specifications for types of seating include the following:

• All seating is to be constructed of steel, aluminium, timber or composite

• Seating shall be installed with above or below ground fixings where possible, on a concrete hard stand

• Seating shall have armrests and backrests to accommodate DAIP requirements

• Style of the seating can vary greatly and will be chosen in order to best suit the intended function within the POS, with consistency within one area preferable

ShelterShelter structures generally provide shade from the sun and protection from inclement weather. Shelters will generally be considered within NOS or DOS where practicable.

Specifications for types of shelters include the following:

• All shelters shall be constructed of steel or aluminium (the City’s preference is for the steel to be galvanised then powder-coated)

• Shelters shall be set on a hard-stand pad (e.g. unit paving or insitu concrete)

• Shelters shall be installed with below ground fixings where possible

• Shelters shall be structurally certified by an accredited engineer and will require City of Armadale Building Approval prior to installation

Public ToiletsThe City will consider installing public toilets in DOS sites in areas which have BBQ facilities, extensive recreation spaces or sites of frequent public sporting activity which invite a longer stay.

The City has a Public Toilet Strategy which further guides the design and implementation of public toilets.

• When considering toilets for parks or in response to a community request, the City will refer to the City of Armadale Public Toilet Strategy 2013

Page 15: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 2928

BBQThe City may consider installing BBQs in NOS or DOS sites adjacent to community recreation spaces such as kick-about or playground facilities. BBQs are preferably co-located with other functions as a focused node for family or community gatherings.

Specifications for BBQs include the following:

• Electric, consisting of either brick or aluminium panels

• Either single or double cooktop • Located on a concrete hard-stand or equal• Generally located in conjunction with a bin,

picnic area and drink fountain • Accessibility to be considered• The inclusion of a water supply with a

vandal proof tap may be required to facilitate cleaning of the area

Drink FountainThe City will consider installing drink fountains in areas that are adjacent to BBQs and picnic hubs, sporting spaces and dog parks.

Specifications for drink fountains include the following:

• Constructed of either steel or aluminium• Drink fountains are to be designed and

located so that they are accessible to people of all abilities

• A dog bowl attachment is preferred (the bowl shall be tilt-able in order to prevent sitting water in the dog bowl)

• Drainage is to be considered (either a soak well or a connection to an outlet)

• Drink fountains to be installed on a hardstand• Drink fountains to consider providing bottle

filling stations

Shade SailStrategically placed shade sails provide shelter from the sun. In exposed open spaces, the City will consider the installation of shade sails to provide shade to playgrounds, picnic spaces or amphitheatres.

Specifications for shade sails include the following:

• Metal poles shall be used • Shade sails should provide a high level of

UVR protection• All free standing structures greater than

1000mm high shall require structural certification by an accredited engineer

• Building approval is to be issued by the City prior to installation

• The lowest point of the shade sail should be installed at 2.5m above the tallest part of the equipment installed underneath

ArtThe City has a Public Art Strategy which further guides the design and installation of art in public spaces.

• Refer to the City of Armadale Art Strategy 2016 for further detail

Hardcourts Hardcourts within open parkland provide an opportunity to engage the community in active outdoor play and provide space for a number of sporting pursuits within one resource. Hard courts could include:

• Tennis courts/badminton• Multi-court• Basketball/netball• Cricket nets • Hit-up walls• Table tennis • 5-a-side soccer• Access for people with disabilities and all age

groups shall be considered when selecting equipment

Specifications for hard courts include the following:

• The surface may vary depending on intended usage (surface options include insitu poured concrete, asphalt, plexi-pave or similar, the surface shall be hardwearing)

• Where line markings for different sports are installed to provide maximum play value, the line marking shall be in accordance with the DLGSC Dimensions Guide for Playing Areas

• Equipment such as nets/rings etc may vary, however all elements are required to be fixed (not removable) and this needs to be considered throughout the design process

Fitness Exercise space and fitness equipment promotes a sense of well-being. It encourages a healthy and active lifestyle for residents within the community.

Exercise spaces are permitted in DOS sites and will be considered for conditional inclusion in NOS and LOS sites.

Specifications for exercise spaces includes the following:

• Equipment shall be installed as per manufacturers’ specifications, including any required fall zone and associated fall zone material

• The City’s preference is for static rather than moveable exercise equipment be installed

Page 16: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 3130

12+ Youth Activity Spaces Youth spaces include local facilities that provide a setting where young people, between the ages of 12 and 25, can engage within a safe positive social environment, recreate and develop new skills.

Youth spaces can stand alone as independent spaces young people can access, engage with and recreate, though can also be activated with a range of youth oriented programmes, workshops, events and activities. Some traditional examples of youth spaces within POS include but are not limited to skate parks, parkour spaces and pump tracks. Youth spaces evolve over time to cater for the community’s needs.

The placement of youth spaces within the City shall allow for passive surveillance and should consider the surrounding environment, as well as servicing requirements (e.g. power and water, car parking and access). Youth spaces can vary in scale and should be installed within parks reflective of the function and classification of the park. For example, ROS and DOS areas may feature a destination youth space where transport links and additional facilities such as carparking, lighting and toilets are critical. NOS and LOS parks may feature a combination of small, informal elements, such as skateable paths, which provide an engaging local space with the expectation of a shorter visitation timeframe.

In particular, the following criteria should be considered when planning for youth spaces:

• Youth spaces require the direct buy-in by the end users and the best examples of youth spaces are usually spaces which have been designed and located through extensive end user engagement (a co-design process is

integral to determine community interest and predict community use post creation)

• Youth activity spaces would typically be associated with other asset types including but not limited to drink fountains, shade/shelter, passive seating and landscaped areas, and would support and promote connectivity to surrounding areas

• Space is particularly important; sufficient space would need to be available for the proposed facility, fall zones, hangout viewing areas or separation zones to hazards such as roads, buffering noise pollution

Considerations regarding the location of youth spaces include:

• Within easy walking distance of public transport

• Easy access to roads and car parking• Passive surveillance in-line with CPTED

principles and nearby active spaces such as schools, playgrounds, shops or sporting pavilions

• Sufficient physical space• Separation from residential areas for noise

complaints• Easy access or sight-lines to other facilities

such toilets, picnic areas, water, shade and shelter

• Within proximity to other youth facilities, to allow friends to participate in various activities within one precinct

• Located on cycle network• Lighting for safety, perception of safety and

accessibility for optimal facility use

It is critical that young people feel a sense of ownership of the space to ensure the space is used effectively and for its intended purpose.

Community GardenA community garden is defined as land cultivated collectively by a community-led group for the purposes of food production and recreational gardening.

Community garden provision will be driven by community needs.

Considerations regarding the location of community gardens include:

• Sufficient physical space• Separation from residential areas for noise

and pest complaints• Provision of other facilities such power,

carparking, public transport, toilets, storage and shelter

• Provision of water for irrigation • Orientation for sunlight, wind and existing soil

conditions or topography • Safety and security

Community gardens require direct buy-in by the end users. When considering requests for community gardens, the City will refer to the Council Policy COMD 9 – Community Gardens and the associated Management Practice, as well as the ‘Community Gardens Toolkit’ document.

Men’s Shed Men’s Sheds are a social enterprise that creates value within the community. They focus on improving men’s health and wellbeing through building programs that achieve desired health outcomes. They are a place for men to socialise and be actively involved in the community.

Considerations regarding the location of Men’s Sheds include:

• Sufficient physical space• Separation from residential areas for noise

complaints• Provision of other facilities such as carparking,

public transport, toilets, storage and water• Safety and security Men’s Sheds are typically not suited to be located within parklands and given their specific requirements, community infrastructure sites are more suitable for this purpose.

Page 17: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 3332

Off Leash Dog FacilitiesOff leash dog facilities provide a safe exercise area for off leash play and social interaction.

The placement of dog parks shall allow for passive surveillance and should consider the surrounding environment, including noise pollution, pedestrian connectivity, car parking and access. As such, off leash dog facilities are mostly suitable for larger recreation spaces.

In particular, the following criteria should be considered for off leash dog facilities:

• Minimum size – varies on the size and location (an overall size of 3,000m2 should be considered the minimum, excl. parking)

• Car parking – this varies depending on the existing site parking conditions and the anticipated size of the off leash dog facility

• The site should contain three separate 1.6m high fenced dog areas, with double gated entry per area (the type of fencing for each area should be customised to cater for smaller or larger dogs)

• Maintenance access gates to the perimeter for each area and between the separate areas are to be provided

• Pedestrian access gates between the separate areas are to be provided

• Double ‘air-lock’ style gates are to be provided at the entrance of each area

• Signage for education and information purposes are to be installed

• Dog agility elements should be considered • Shade should be provided by trees and/or

shade sails • Provide a minimum of one per each zone

• Drink fountain with tilting dog bowl• Bin with dog bag dispenser • Seating

• The location of the required elements is to be considered from a maintenance and usability perspective

• Irrigated turf is to be provided• Variable surfaces such as grass, paving, sand

and mulch only areas for dog play and tactile simulation should also be included

IrrigationIrrigation supports the health and longevity of trees, shrubs and turf and is vital given our hot summer and dry climate.

Irrigation may be installed in all open space areas as required, excluding streetscapes and nature reserves, which may be installed on a conditional or temporary basis. All requests for irrigation shall be considered against the City’s local water sub-area operating strategy, availability of a ‘fit for purpose’ non-potable or potable water source as approved by DWER.

The City will not approve dry parks within new residential areas without evidence of extensive exploration into irrigation options.

• Irrigation shall be sourced from a sustainable source

• Specifications for irrigation design and installation include the following:• City of Armadale - Standard

Specification Irrigation System Design and Installation

• City of Armadale - Standard Specification for Bore, Pumps Headworks and Electrical Cubicles

TreesTrees comprise a part of the landscape. They provide shade from the sun and reduce the heat island effect by lowering air temperature and increasing humidity.

Given the importance of trees within the landscape, they are permitted to be installed throughout all different classifications of parks within the City. Trees are strategically designed into a landscape to complement the aesthetics of the existing area, while taking into consideration the requirements of the local community.

Exotic and native trees will be considered in the landscape depending on their appropriateness for the associated park function.

All bio-retention areas, rain gardens, living streams, basins, etc require over story tree planting to assist in the protection of the younger lower planting below and to increase the water uptake when the appropriate tree species is selected.

Trees are required to be installed in all car parking areas if possible and within areas of parallel parking. Trees may require root barriers to protect against damage to kerbs or roads.

The City will consider any tree proposed within public open space areas as tree selection is specific to a site and a standard list may prohibit biodiversity. There is a complex list of street trees within the City’s Urban Forest Strategy. Refer to this document for additional information.

PlantingPlantings can provide food and shelter for local fauna within the area. They are also aesthetically pleasing and create a sense of place within the landscape. Planting may also provide a nutrient stripping function in areas for water treatment.

Shrub planting will be considered for all landscape classifications.

Specifications for planting include the following:

• Soil shall be amended where required, to ensure the planting medium is of a high standard

• Mulch shall be chipped pine bark mulch to Australian Standards (site mulch not accepted) and is to be a minimum of 75mm deep

• Plants shall be sourced from an accredited plant nursery and planted as per standard horticultural practices

Page 18: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 34

Scheduled Sports Active turf spaces or dedicated sporting infrastructure for scheduled sports will be predominantly installed in NOS, DOS and ROS for the purpose of providing playing spaces for local sporting clubs. In some cases these facilities will be co-located with adjacent Department of Education sites and a dedicated Shared Use Agreement will be required.

Scheduled sports can include, but are not limited to:

• Active turf playing fields for cricket, soccer, AFL or baseball, including associated infrastructure such as goals, training nets, wickets and protective wicket matting

• Tennis, basketball or netball hardcourts

Specifications for active turf fields include:

• City of Armadale Specification for the Design and Installation of Sports Ovals and Surrounds

• City of Armadale Active Public Open Space guidelines (currently in draft format)

• Grass type to be C4 warm season kikuyu ‘Village Green’

Kick-about space Area of turf for passive and active informal uses provide the community with opportunities for unscheduled recreation. This may range from two people kicking a soccer ball to a social game of soccer.

Specifications for kick-about turf should meet the following criteria:

• Irrigated• Located above the 1:5 top water level• Minimum clear width 20m by 20m• Vehicle accessible for ongoing maintenance • Cluster tree placements and bollards in

nearby garden beds out of turf areas to reduce maintenance

• Turf to be kikuyu grass or equal approved variety

Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) WSUD involves planning and designing urban areas in order to manage and make use of runoff from rainfall events. The water may discharge into rain gardens, bio-retention basins, overland flow or conveyance swales.

Site specific soil amendment and site specific planting is required for each WSUD area to ensure there is sufficient water nutrient management. These elements form part of a broader drainage function and need to be considered from a drainage function along with nutrient stripping function.

• Refer to the City’s Water Resource Management for Land Development Position Paper for further information

POS

Cla

ssifi

catio

n

Size Ha

Pathways

Bridges

Signage

Car Parking

Access Control

Lighting

Play

Bin

Dog Bin

Seating

Shelter

Public Toilet

BBQ

Drink Fountain

Shade Sails

Art

Hard Courts

Fitness

Youth

Community Garden

Men's Shed

Dog Park

Irrigation

Trees

Planting

Scheduled Sports

Kick-about

WSUD

DOS

Spor

t 8.

4Y

CY

YY

YY

YC

YY

YY

YC

CY

CC

CC

CY

YY

YY

CR

ecre

atio

n 2.

1Y

CC

YY

YY

YC

YY

YY

YC

CC

CC

CC

CY

YY

NY

C

Nat

ure

9.3

CC

YC

Y

NN

NN

YC

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

C

NOS

Spor

t 5.

0Y

CC

YY

YY

YC

YY

CC

CC

CC

CC

CC

CY

YY

YY

C

Rec

reat

ion

2.4

YC

CC

YC

YY

CY

YC

YY

CC

CC

CN

NN

YY

YN

YC

Nat

ure

3.4

YC

CC

YN

CN

NY

CN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NC

LOS

Rec

reat

ion

0.8

YC

CN

YN

YC

CY

CN

NN

NN

NC

NN

NN

YY

YN

YC

Nat

ure

1.3

CC

YN

YN

NN

NY

CN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NC

Faci

litie

s M

atrix

Y - Y

es u

sual

ly in

clud

edN

- N

ot u

sual

ly in

clud

edC

- O

n si

te b

y si

te b

asis

The

Faci

litie

s M

atrix

is a

vis

ual r

epre

sent

atio

n of

the

aver

age

prov

isio

n of

infra

stru

ctur

e pe

r PO

S ty

pe a

nd fu

nctio

n, a

s cu

rrent

ly p

rovi

ded

with

in th

e C

ity.

Page 19: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 37

Analysis

Like for Like Comparison The following section compares existing POS infrastructure against the average as determined through the benchmarking phase to identify potential gaps.

The following section features:

• A facilities assessment, where a value is applied to the type of facility to generate an overall park facilities score for each category

• A facilities score assessment summary which provides a summary of the facilities within each suburb, highlighting suburbs with a lower facility score

• Discusses identified gaps in areas where the provision of additional facilities could be considered

Page 20: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 38

Facilities Score The facilities assessment template applies a number value to the type of facility to generate an overall park facilities score.

The ScoreA score has been determined for each type of facility. This score will vary by the classification of POS the facility may be located in. The score varies by the average provision of the facility in each classification and the typical installation, maintenance and renewal costs.

For example, a footpath is generally included in all POS classifications and is an economical inclusion, therefore it is generally given a score of 1 in all classifications.

A drink fountain is a specialist item and is costly to install, renew and maintain. Therefore it is given a higher maximum score in the classification it would usually be considered acceptable.

Should a facility be deemed a conditional inclusion for the POS Classification, a maximum score of 1 would be applied.

Should a facility be deemed inappropriate for the POS classification, a score of 0 would be applied (i.e. a grass kick-about space within a dedicated nature reserve).

The AssessmentThis provides a basis to compare like for like across the City, identify facility gaps in individual parks and highlight overall suburbs where the provision of facilities could be increased.

Faci

litie

s As

sess

men

t Tem

plat

e

POS

Cla

ssifi

catio

n

Faci

lity

Type

Max Score

Percentage

Pathways

Bridges

Signage

Car Parking

Access Control

Lighting

Play

Bin

Dog Bin

Seating

Shelter

Public Toilet

BBQ

Drink Fountain

Shade Sails

Art

Hard Courts

Fitness

Youth

Community Garden

Men's Shed

Dog Park

Irrigation

Trees

Planting

Scheduled Sports

Passive Turf

WSUD

DOS

Spor

t 1

11

101

1010

11

110

1010

51

15

11

11

110

55

105

112

0

100%

Rec

reat

ion

11

110

110

101

11

1010

105

11

11

11

11

105

50

51

106

Nat

ure

11

11

10

00

01

10

00

00

00

00

00

05

50

01

18

NOS

Spor

t 1

11

101

1010

11

15

11

51

11

11

11

110

55

105

193

Rec

reat

ion

11

11

11

101

11

101

105

11

11

10

00

105

50

51

76

Nat

ure

11

11

10

10

01

10

00

00

00

00

00

05

50

01

19

LOS

Rec

reat

ion

11

10

10

101

11

10

00

00

01

00

00

105

50

51

45

Nat

ure

11

10

10

00

01

10

00

00

00

00

00

05

50

01

17

Page 21: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 40

Suburb Averages Every park within the City has been assessed utilising the same facilities assessment template.

These scores have been converted to a percentage and summarised to create an average suburb profile per POS classification.

Anomalies It should be noted that not all parks fit the classifications perfectly and this has led to some facility scores that could be considered a misrepresentation.

Some parks are specialist spaces and the function does not always fit the standard description or facility provision the score is based on.

Whilst the assessment template provides an average for the comparison between parks, there will always be a need to consider facilities on a site by site basis.

For example, Palomino Park is a specialist sporting space for horse riding and does not fit the standard description for a District Sporting POS. Other example spaces that do not fit the standard description are Karragullen Hall or Bedfordale Hall as their primary function is a community building rather than a neighbourhood parkland setting. The strategy is not intended to address community buildings and associated infrastructure, these will be addressed through a separate master planning exercise.

Faci

litie

s Av

erag

e by

Sub

urb

POS

Cla

ssifi

catio

n

Average

Subu

rb

Harrisdale

Piara Waters

Hilbert

Forrestdale

Champion Lakes

Haynes

Brookdale

Wungong

Seville Grove

Camillo

Armadale

Kelmscott

Mt Nasura

Mt Richon

Bedfordale

Roleystone

Karragullen

DOS

Spor

t 62

%93

%45

%31

%*

54%

61%

68%

80%

54%

Rec

reat

ion

78%

87%

70%

Nat

ure

76%

78%

76%

NOS

Spor

t 65

%78

%66

%71

%47

%

Rec

reat

ion

56%

89%

72%

57%

47%

63%

44%

54%

28%

38%

*53

%8%

*

Nat

ure

89%

89%

95%

84%

LOS

Rec

reat

ion

55%

77%

62%

62%

79%

74%

33%

56%

43%

39%

42%

49%

31%

27%

Nat

ure

60%

79%

79%

65%

65%

88%

35%

53%

47%

76%

36%

66%

57%

55%

65%

65%

53%

With

in 2

5% +

/- of

ave

rage

Be

low

ave

rage

Ab

ove

aver

age

Not

App

licab

le

*Incl

udes

par

ks th

at c

ould

be

cons

ider

ed a

n an

omal

y

Page 22: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 43

As noted in the previous section, some POS classifications within certain suburbs may have a below average provision when compared like for like to other suburbs. Anomalies and site by site issues must be taken into consideration however it is evident that some suburbs generally have an overall below average provision.

In addition, some of the suburbs noted will face an increasing population through new development or infill residential housing. Research has been undertaken by Forecast.id to predict the City’s growth up to 2036. It is anticipated that the suburbs may increase in population by the following percentages:

• 1170% Haynes• 972% Hilbert• 401% Forrestdale• 264% Champion Lakes• 118% Piara Waters• 46% Brookdale/Wungong• 34% Harrisdale• 28% Armadale • 27% Camillo• 27% Kelmscott • 14% Seville Grove• 9% Bedfordale/Ashendon• 9% Roleystone/Karragullen/Lesley• 7% Mount Nasura/Mount Richon

Many of the developing suburbs such as Haynes and Hilbert will have additional POS provided under the subdivision process to meet the community demand. However in existing suburbs such as Kelmscott and Armadale, the provision of additional POS will not be possible due to a lack of available space.

Therefore in addition to the below average provision, population growth and density has also been a considered factor in developing the following improvement plan.

Improvements Gaps for Consideration

Page 23: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 44

A Note on Funding

Park

Impr

ovem

ent P

lan

- To

p 25

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

L

1. S

igni

fican

t (80

-10

0)1.

Low

1.

Nil

1. N

ew, 1

00%

30%

30%

10%

30%

100%

1-5

Year

s

2. A

bove

Ave

rage

(6

0-80

)2.

Min

or2.

Not

cur

rent

ly

cons

ider

ed2.

Goo

d 5-

10Ye

ars

3. A

vera

ge (5

0-60

)3.

Ave

rage

3.

Lim

ited

Fund

ing

oppo

runi

ties

3. A

dequ

ate

10-1

5Ye

ars

4. M

inor

(25-

50)

4. A

bove

Av

erag

e4.

Fun

ding

op

poru

nitie

s4.

Wor

k re

quire

d15 Ye

ars

+

5. L

ow (0

-25)

5. S

igni

fican

t5.

Ded

icat

ed

fund

ing

avai

labl

e

5. E

nd o

f use

ful

life/

new

faci

lity

Tota

lSc

ore.

Max

20

TOTA

LW

EIG

HT

EDSC

OR

E

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Willi

am a

nd A

lfred

Ske

et R

eser

ve4

24

414

2412

824

68.0

010

Har

ber P

ark

41%

44

13

1224

242

1868

.00

10

Fl

emat

ti Pa

rk0%

54

55

1930

2410

3094

.00

1

Ashw

orth

Par

k 35

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

Ashw

orth

Par

k 2

35%

44

13

1224

242

1868

.00

10

Ti

cklie

Par

k (p

art)

47%

43

33

1324

186

1866

.00

24

A14

Ba

rry P

oad

Res

erve

47

%4

33

313

2418

618

66.0

024

A1

4

Cor

onda

le P

ark

(Par

t)38

%4

33

313

2418

618

66.0

024

A1

4

Unn

amed

Par

k (L

omon

d W

ay )

12%

53

34

1530

186

2478

.00

3

A14

M

orga

n Pa

rk48

%4

43

213

2424

612

66.0

024

B

Mem

oria

l Par

k70

%2

45

415

1224

1024

70.0

09

Min

naw

arra

Par

k59

%3

44

314

1824

818

68.0

010

Wilc

anni

a To

onga

bbie

par

k28

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

D

awso

n R

eser

ve33

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

Pe

lham

Res

erve

14%

54

13

1330

242

1874

.00

7

Alde

rson

par

k21

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

Bavi

ch R

eser

ve

13%

54

413

3024

024

78.0

03

D

amer

ham

Par

k42

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

G

eorg

e Fo

ster

Res

erve

38

%4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

010

C

lem

ents

Par

k 24

%5

41

313

3024

218

74.0

07

R

obin

Par

k16

%5

41

414

3024

224

80.0

02

M

ogo

Park

20%

54

12

1230

242

1268

.00

10

Mig

rant

Par

k16

%5

35

316

3018

1018

76.0

05

Eric

a St

reet

Par

k 29

%4

35

416

2418

1024

76.0

05

G

Gem

sarn

a Pa

rk20

%5

31

312

3018

218

68.0

010

Tr

edal

e Pa

rk31

%4

33

313

2418

618

66.0

024

E

Coo

lber

ia P

ark

18%

52

33

1330

126

1866

.00

24

E

W

oodc

roft

Park

24%

52

33

1330

126

1866

.00

24

E

Be

dfor

ddal

e H

all

24%

43

14

1224

182

2468

.00

10

BenB

ecul

a Pa

rk55

%3

34

414

1818

824

68.0

010

Tr

edal

e Pa

rk31

%4

34

415

2418

824

74.0

07

E

45%

Park

s w

ith a

hig

h pr

iorit

y ra

nkin

g w

ithin

sub

urbs

with

low

ove

rall

faci

lity

scor

e bu

t no

fund

ing

avai

labi

lity

Park

s w

ith a

hig

h pr

iorit

y ra

nkin

g w

ithin

sub

urbs

with

a re

ason

able

ov

eral

l fac

ility

scor

e bu

t no

fund

ing

Proj

ects

rank

ed h

ighl

y an

d w

ithin

su

burb

s w

ith re

ason

able

ove

rall

faci

lity

scor

e bu

t no

fund

ing

avai

labi

lity

SCO

RES

1-5

W

EIG

HTE

D S

CO

RES

Scor

es 1

-5W

eigh

ted

Scor

es

P R I O R I T Y R A N K I N G

Indi

cativ

e Ti

mef

ram

ePo

tent

ial F

undi

ng S

ourc

es

Park

s w

ith im

med

iate

fund

ing

avai

labi

lity

The PIP takes into consideration existing approved or potential funding sources such as Capital or Renewal funds, POS Strategy funds, Cash-in-Lieu, Grants or Developer Contribution Plan funds.

It is important to note these funding streams are only potential sources and each funding source may require a separate approval process.

In order to further consider the POS requiring improvements, all existing POS were subject to additional assessment according to specific criteria and weighting as outlined below.

Criterion One - Facility Score Under the analysis section, each park was given a facility score, derived through comparison to similar parks. The lower the facility score, the higher the criterion score.

Criterion Two - NeedThis criterion considers the estimated population increase predicted over the next 15 years and the implications this will have on existing POS. It also considers the overall suburb facility score, comparing the level of facilities and similar POS provided within the area, to give an estimate of need.

Criterion Three - Availability of FundingThis criterion considers what funding is currently available to undertake improvement works, with priority given to projects which have existing funding opportunities.

Park Improvement Plan Criterion Four - Asset Condition This criterion considers the existing asset condition noting the life, condition and functionality of the assets provided. Should the assets be fit for purpose and in good condition, then a low criterion score is applied.

Assessments for all the parks can be found in the appendix.

Key projects have been identified and form the key elements of the Park Improvement Plan (PIP).

Each of the key projects will be subject to detailed analysis and design as well as social planning mechanisms to ensure that the focus is centred on community use.

The next stage of the PIP will be to create an operational implementation plan to map out the proposed improvement works, timeframe and review the cost and funding sources.

Page 24: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 47

Conclusion

Recommendation Responsibility 1 Adopt the standard POS outlined in this strategy as a

guideline for future development CoA, State Government, Developers

2 Adopt the standard facility provision as outlined in this strategy as a guideline for future development and park improvements

CoA, State Government, Developers

3 Adopt the PIP and develop operational implementation plan. Note the priorities when considering future capital budgets, POS Strategy funds, Cash-in-Lieu, Grants or Developer Contribution Plan funds.

CoA

Recommendations

The Parks Facilities Strategy has identified how the City’s POS could be created, developed and renewed over the next 15 years. The document has set a standard for parks within the City providing definitive guidance for developers, staff and Council.

The strategy has determined 25 key projects which will be reviewed on an annual basis to determine the most appropriate funding source and applicable project at the time.

Page 25: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 4948

Appendix

Appendix A - Park Base Information

Appendix B - Full Assessment List PIP

50

55

Page 26: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 5150

App

endi

x A

Par

k B

ase

Info

rmat

ion

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Spor

tH

arris

dale

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

8.2

YN

YY

YY

1Y

YY

11

11

YN

21

NN

NN

YY

YY

YY

86%

Willi

am L

ocka

rd P

ark

1.6

YY

YY

NY

1Y

YY

NN

11

YY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

89%

Jim

and

Alm

a Pa

rk

0.9

YY

YY

YY

1Y

NY

2N

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

91%

Shea

f Par

k 1.

5Y

YN

YY

Y1

YN

Y2

N1

1N

N1

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y93

%Sa

ndst

one

Park

1.

2Y

YY

YY

Y1

YY

Y1

N1

2Y

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y97

%G

reen

link

Park

1.39

YY

NY

YY

1Y

NY

NN

23

YN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

86%

Her

onw

ood

Park

5.

56Y

YY

YY

YN

YY

Y1

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y10

0%Ji

m a

nd A

lma

Park

2.5

YN

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

91%

Tipu

ana

Park

0.

59Y

NN

YY

Y1

YN

Y6

NN

2Y

YN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y90

%So

ther

by P

ark

0.65

YY

NY

NY

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

80%

Con

ical

Par

k0.

43Y

YY

YY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y85

%Si

lver

shot

Par

k0.

33Y

YN

YY

N1

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y88

%W

yom

ing

Park

0.

33Y

NN

YY

N1

YN

YN

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y85

%Sp

lend

id P

ark

0.39

YN

NY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

88%

Nor

ther

ly P

ark

0.9

YN

YY

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

1N

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

83%

Bays

tone

Par

k1.

9Y

YY

YY

N1

YY

YN

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y90

%C

rest

ed P

ark

1.06

YY

YN

YN

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

88%

War

bler

Par

k1.

2Y

YY

NY

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y88

%G

reen

shan

k Pa

rk

0.34

YY

NN

YN

NN

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

85%

Fern

hill

Park

0.54

YY

NN

YN

1Y

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

88%

Dov

edal

e Pa

rk (P

art)

0.98

YY

NY

YN

1Y

NY

3N

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

93%

Unn

amed

( La

faye

tte A

venu

e)0.

96Y

NN

NY

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y83

%Vi

ctor

y Pa

rk0.

2Y

NN

YY

N1

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N80

%La

faye

tte P

ark

0.64

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

78%

Shep

herd

Par

k 2.

4N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%M

ossg

reen

Par

k 0.

49Y

YN

YN

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y76

%Be

nalla

Par

k 0.

66Y

YY

YN

YN

YN

YN

N1

1N

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y82

%La

urai

ne P

ark

1.4

YY

YY

NY

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

82%

Oak

leig

h Pa

rk0.

89Y

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y82

%To

larn

o Pa

rk

0.37

YY

NY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

76%

Whi

teho

rse

Park

0.

31Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y76

%Ji

m a

nd A

lma

Park

CC

W0.

56Y

YY

YY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y88

%D

oved

ale

Park

(par

t)1.

7Y

NN

YY

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y82

%

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

LO

CA

L

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

DIS

TR

ICT

Nat

ure

Rec

reat

ion

HA

RR

ISD

ALE

Faci

lity

Scor

e

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rec

reat

ion

Rob

ot P

ark

3.1

YY

NY

YY

1Y

NY

21

21

YY

2N

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

85%

Piar

a W

ater

s O

val

4.1

YN

YY

YY

1Y

NY

N1

NN

YN

2N

NN

NN

YY

YY

YY

79%

Burto

nia

Park

1.9

YN

YY

YN

1Y

YY

NN

NN

NN

2N

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

70%

Willo

wda

le P

ark

0.83

YN

NY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

11

YN

2N

NN

NN

YY

YN

YN

86%

Free

sia

Park

0.65

YN

NY

YY

1Y

NY

1N

12

NN

N1

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

87%

Aspi

ri Pa

rk1

YY

YY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

80%

Villa

tella

Par

k 2.

8Y

YN

NY

Y1

YY

Y2

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y67

%Er

ade

Park

1Y

NN

YY

NN

YN

YN

NN

1N

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y70

%Br

oadw

ay P

ark

2.2

YY

YY

YY

1Y

NY

3N

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

80%

Whi

ttake

r Par

k 0.

16Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

N53

%Tu

rin P

ark

0.1

YN

NY

YN

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

YY

68%

Berk

shire

Par

k0.

34Y

NY

NY

N1

YN

Y1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N75

%R

oset

te P

ark

1.3

YY

NN

NY

NY

YY

NN

11

NN

N1

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

70%

Bayo

nne

Park

0.86

YN

YY

YN

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

73%

Mar

seille

Par

k 1.

4Y

NY

YY

NN

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y73

%Bl

uebe

ech

Park

0.

25Y

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y63

%G

uerin

Par

k 1.

6Y

YN

NY

N1

YN

YN

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y75

%Ba

lliol C

t Par

k0.

24Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N63

%Le

roy

Park

0.

32Y

NN

NY

N1

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y70

%R

uffle

Par

k 0.

9Y

YN

NY

YN

YN

YY

NN

NN

N2

1N

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y75

%M

orab

a Pa

rk (P

art)

0.72

YY

NN

YN

1Y

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

78%

Mon

ticel

lo P

ark

1.2

YN

NN

YN

1N

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

73%

Gen

omic

s Pa

rk

0.25

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

65%

McP

hail

Park

1.8

YY

NY

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

82%

Bedb

rook

Par

k1.

16Y

YN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y76

%Ke

llogg

Par

k0.

51Y

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y71

%Ba

te P

ark

0.37

YN

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

82%

Med

war

Loo

p0.

146

YN

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

82%

Rot

hery

Par

k 0.

6Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y82

%U

nnam

ed P

OS

(Ros

site

r PO

S A)

0.9

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

76%

Clo

ut P

ark

0.63

YN

NN

YN

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

82%

Aspi

ri Pa

rk (p

art)

0.75

YY

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

82%

Torri

dge

Park

0.

85Y

NN

YY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y82

%M

orab

a Pa

rk (p

art)

1.7

YY

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

82%

Torin

o Pa

rk0.

94Y

YN

NY

NN

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y82

%Sk

eet R

oad

Basi

n 0.

6Y

NN

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

Y76

%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rec

reat

ion

Ger

alld

Rus

sel P

ark

1.8

YN

YY

YN

NY

YY

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

65%

Lette

rken

ny P

ark

0.72

YN

NY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

80%

Allw

ood

Park

(Par

t)2.

9Y

NY

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y68

%N

atur

eAl

lwoo

d Pa

rk0.

65N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%Li

fford

Par

k0.

13N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NN

N65

%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Nat

ure

LO

CA

L

LO

CA

L

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

Spor

tN

EIG

HB

OU

RH

OO

D

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NC

OM

MU

NIT

Y

Piar

a W

ater

s

DIS

TR

ICT

Rec

reat

ion

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

Hilb

ert

Rec

reat

ion

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

N

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Spor

tPa

lam

ino

Park

4.3

NN

YY

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YY

YN

31%

Joe

Saun

ders

Par

k1.

4Y

YY

YY

Y1

YY

Y5

N2

3Y

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y88

%C

ham

pion

Bea

ch P

ark

1.4

YN

YY

YN

1Y

YY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NN

75%

Nat

ure

Bill

Cla

re P

ark

0.18

YN

YY

NY

NY

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NY

88%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rec

reat

ion

Jarv

is P

ark

1.5

YY

YY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

83%

Mar

kwel

l Par

k1.

2Y

YN

YY

Y1

YY

Y1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y85

%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Don

Sim

mon

s Pa

rk

4.8

YN

YY

YY

1Y

YY

NN

11

NY

31

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

74%

Har

ber P

ark

3Y

NY

NY

N1

YN

YN

NN

NN

Y1

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N53

%W

alla

by P

ark

0.66

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

YN

40%

Bron

zew

ing

Park

0.

94Y

NN

NN

11

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N48

%M

asse

l Par

k0.

53Y

NY

YY

YN

YN

Y1

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y63

%Fl

emat

ti Pa

rk0.

54N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

N0%

Ashw

orth

Par

k 1.

2N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y35

%As

hwor

th P

ark

20.

42Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N24

%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

LO

CA

L

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

LO

CA

L

Hay

nes

DIS

TR

ICT

Rec

reat

ion

Cha

mpi

on L

akes

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

Nat

ure

Bro

okda

le

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

DIS

TR

ICT

Nat

ure

Flet

cher

Par

k19

NN

YY

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YY

NN

78%

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 1

0.64

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

53%

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 2

0.83

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

53%

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 3

4.5

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

53%

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il40.

52N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N53

%R

ails

Cre

scen

t Brid

le T

rail

52.

2N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N53

%R

ails

Cre

scen

t Brid

le T

rail

61.

2N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N53

%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Spor

tBo

b Bl

ackb

urn

Park

5.5

YN

YY

YY

1Y

NY

1N

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YY

YN

58%

San

Jaci

nta

Park

2

YN

YN

YN

1Y

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YN

54%

Mat

hew

Sto

tt Pa

rk

4.8

YN

YN

YY

1Y

YY

NN

NN

NY

11

NN

NN

YY

NN

YY

69%

Tick

lie P

ark

(par

t)5.

26Y

YY

YY

Y1

YY

11

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NY

Y61

%N

atur

eC

ilant

ro P

ark

3.7

YY

NY

YY

1Y

NY

NN

1N

YN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

91%

Bois

dale

Par

k1.

7Y

NN

YY

N1

YN

Y1

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y85

%Te

al B

rook

Par

k0.

97Y

NY

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y60

%Ba

rry P

oad

Park

1

YN

YY

YN

1N

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

48%

LO

CA

LPa

mpl

ona

Park

0.

7Y

NY

NY

Y1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

N63

%Se

min

ole

Park

1.

8Y

NY

NY

Y1

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

N55

%H

eske

th P

ark

0.13

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

NY

44%

Tick

lie P

ark

(Par

t)1.

28Y

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y72

%M

orol

o Pa

rk0.

97N

NN

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N33

%C

oron

dale

Par

k 4.

6N

NN

YY

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y61

%U

nnam

ed (

Lom

ond

Way

Dra

inag

e )

2.3

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

11%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

eD

IST

RIC

T

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Wun

gong

Nat

ure

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

Se

ville

Gro

ve

Rec

reat

ion

LO

CA

L

Nat

ure

Rec

reat

ion

Page 27: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 5352

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Kuhl

Par

k4.

2Y

NY

YY

Y1

YY

Y1

N1

2N

Y1

1N

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y93

%Bi

ll an

d Ev

a (P

art)

Park

1Y

NY

NY

N1

NN

Y1

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N66

%W

estfi

eld

Her

on P

ark

2.57

YN

YN

YY

1Y

YY

1N

NN

YN

2N

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

57%

Nat

ure

Bill

and

Eva

Nat

ure

Park

2Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y91

%G

rove

land

s Pa

rk1.

2Y

NY

NY

N1

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

N55

%R

ed T

ingl

e Pa

rk1.

04Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N28

%W

estfi

eld

Park

1.

6Y

NY

YY

N1

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

Y45

%Tr

oon

Park

0.43

NN

YN

YY

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YN

40%

Nat

ure

Kend

al F

lora

Par

k1.

1Y

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N76

%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Mor

gan

Park

6.4

YN

YY

YY

1Y

NY

NN

NN

NN

4N

NN

NN

YY

NY

YN

49%

Gw

ynne

Par

k 14

YN

YY

YY

1Y

YY

1N

12

NN

10N

1N

NN

YY

YY

YN

71%

Rec

reat

ion

Mem

oria

l Par

k1

YN

YN

YY

1Y

NY

11

N2

YY

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YN

66%

Spor

tC

reyk

Par

k5.

5Y

NY

YY

Y1

YY

Y1

NN

NY

N1

N1

NN

NY

YY

YY

N65

%R

ecre

atio

nLi

ons

Park

0.82

YY

YY

YN

1Y

YY

11

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YY

67%

Sanc

tuar

y La

ke3.

2Y

YY

NY

YN

YY

Y1

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y69

%M

inna

war

ra P

ark

3.6

YY

YN

YY

NY

YY

1N

N2

NY

NN

1N

NN

YY

YN

YY

70%

Reg

Willi

ams

Park

3.8

YN

YY

YY

1Y

YY

1N

11

NN

21

1Y

NN

YY

NN

YY

80%

Wilc

anni

a / T

oong

abbi

e Pa

rk1.

42Y

NY

NY

N1

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N41

%D

awso

n Pa

rk1.

2Y

NY

NY

N1

YN

Y1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N41

%Pe

lham

Par

k1.

8N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N19

%Al

ders

on P

ark

0.75

YN

YN

YN

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

26%

Rec

reat

ion

Bavi

ch P

ark

0.23

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

15%

Dam

erha

m P

ark

0.92

YN

YN

YN

1Y

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

40%

Mat

ron

Oliv

e G

allie

rs P

ark

0.33

YN

YN

YY

1Y

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

40%

Geo

rge

Fost

er P

ark

0.64

YN

YN

YY

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YY

50%

Cle

men

ts P

ark

0.44

YN

NN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

30%

Rob

in P

ark

0.34

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

20%

Sext

y Pa

rk0.

49Y

NN

NY

Y1

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N38

%R

otar

y Pa

rk0.

71Y

NY

NY

Y1

YN

Y1

NN

1N

N1

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

N75

%M

ogo

Park

0.3

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

23%

Hor

rie H

ill Pa

rk0.

55Y

NY

NY

N1

NN

YN

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

N83

%N

atur

eR

ingw

ood

Park

1.2

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NY

47%

Unn

amed

PO

S (N

errig

in B

rook

Prim

ary)

0.35

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

29%

LO

CA

LU

nnam

ed P

OS

(Sev

ille D

rive

)0.

32Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

N35

%U

nnam

ed P

OS

(Tai

t Stre

et)

0.43

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NY

41%

Unn

amed

PO

S (K

ootin

gal S

treet

)0.

25Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

Y41

%U

nnam

ed P

OS

(Koo

tinga

l Stre

et)

0.52

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

29%

Unn

amed

PO

S (H

obbs

Driv

e)1

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NY

41%

Unn

amed

PO

S (G

irraw

een

Stre

et D

rain

age)

0.

17N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

Y12

%W

yee

Park

0.32

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YY

29%

Burro

wa

Park

0.55

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

24%

Unn

amed

PO

S (F

ifth

Roa

d En

try)

0.08

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

35%

Sher

iff P

ark

0.25

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

41%

Dal

e Pa

rk

0.3

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

29%

Alla

wah

Par

k 0.

66Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

N41

%U

nnam

ed P

OS

(Nee

rigin

Bro

ok D

rain

age)

1.

6Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

Y41

%An

gelo

Par

k0.

63N

NN

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N35

%W

ernd

ley

Park

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

Y35

%W

illiam

Tur

ner P

ark

0.59

YN

YN

YN

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

53%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NG

RE

EN

INFR

AST

RU

CT

UR

E

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

RE

CR

EA

TIO

NC

amill

o

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

N

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CO

MM

UN

ITY

Arm

adal

e

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

N

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

t

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rus

hton

Par

k8.

1Y

NY

YY

Y1

YY

Y10

12

1N

N3

NN

NN

NY

YY

YY

N85

%Jo

hn D

unn

Park

11Y

NY

YY

Y1

YN

Y2

NN

NN

N3

NN

NN

YY

YY

YY

N63

%M

imos

a Pa

rk0.

86N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y72

%C

reyk

Nat

ure

Park

0.28

YN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

72%

Lloy

d H

ughe

s Pa

rk17

NN

YN

YN

NN

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

83%

Spor

tFr

ye P

ark

5.3

YN

YY

YY

1Y

YY

11

N1

YN

6N

1N

NN

YY

YY

YN

67%

Brya

n G

ell P

ark

1.8

YN

YN

YY

1N

NN

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YY

54%

Fanc

ote

Park

1.7

YN

YY

YY

1Y

NY

1N

11

NY

N1

NN

NN

NY

YN

YY

77%

Mig

rant

Par

k3.

8Y

NY

NN

NN

YY

N1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

Y24

%Be

rnic

e H

argr

ave

Park

2.

2Y

NY

YY

Y1

YN

YY

N1

YN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

N81

%Bl

ackb

urne

Par

k0.

31Y

NY

NY

Y1

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N50

%Er

ica

St P

ark

0.19

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

30%

Hea

ther

Loc

ke P

ark

0.43

YN

YN

YY

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

NN

68%

Tollin

gton

Par

k1.

6Y

NY

NY

Y1

YN

YN

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NN

YY

NY

Y70

%Fo

ster

Par

k0.

31Y

NY

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N35

%Ab

ingd

on P

ark

1.1

YN

YN

YY

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

1N

NN

NN

YY

YN

YN

78%

Apex

Par

k0.

53Y

NY

NY

Y1

YN

Y1

NN

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NY

N45

%Va

lent

ine

Park

0.55

YN

YN

YY

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YN

53%

Gem

sarn

a Pa

rk

0.2

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

23%

Ran

ford

Par

k1.

3Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

Y30

%N

atur

eBr

ooks

ide

Park

(com

bine

d)3.

5Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y71

%M

eyer

Par

k0.

59Y

NY

NY

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NY

N76

%As

plin

Par

k0.

096

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

Wrig

ht B

rook

Par

k 1.

4Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y71

%W

ard

Park

0.27

YN

NN

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Arbo

ur P

ark

0.61

YN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

76%

Gilla

im D

rive

Park

1.5

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

53%

Reg

ina

Park

0.41

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

35%

Unn

amed

- Sp

ence

r Roa

d0.

55Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y76

%C

amm

ilo P

ark

0.24

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Poss

um P

ark

0.89

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

65%

Goo

larm

rup

Park

1.8

YN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

76%

Hic

k/Sa

vage

Par

k1.

5N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NY

Y71

%U

nnam

ed -

Ran

ford

Stre

et

0.35

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Har

mer

sley

Par

k 0.

45Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%M

orris

ion

Park

0.47

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Scot

t Par

k 1.

5N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%H

illtop

Par

k1.

6N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rec

reat

ion

Der

ry P

ark

2.2

YN

NN

YN

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YY

51%

Patte

rson

Par

k (p

art)

0.48

YN

YN

YN

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

YY

78%

Maz

zega

Par

k0.

55N

NY

NN

N1

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y61

%W

ando

o Pa

rk0.

42Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Ba

mle

tt Pa

rk0.

48N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

N29

%Ad

air P

ark

0.3

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NN

24%

Car

rigg

Park

3.7

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

Whi

tting

ton

Park

0.65

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Ellis

Par

k0.

28N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N47

%Pa

tters

on P

ark

1N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%C

allo

w P

ark

0.15

41%

Rus

hton

Par

k 0.

49N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%W

estv

iew

Par

k4.

2N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N59

%U

nnam

ed (H

enrie

tta A

venu

e)4.

2N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N59

%M

azze

ga P

ark

(Par

t)0.

68N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%H

enrie

tta P

ark

0.23

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

YN

59%

Peac

eful

Pon

d Pa

rk4.

6Y

YN

NN

NN

YY

Y1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y88

%C

arra

dain

e Pa

rk

0.78

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Rec

reat

ion

Tred

ale

Park

0.96

NN

YN

NN

1N

NY

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

43%

0.96

11

00

00

00

Amet

hyst

Par

k 0.

14N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N59

%Er

rol G

reen

Par

k1.

1Y

NY

NY

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N82

%N

eerig

en B

rook

Par

k 5.

7Y

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y82

%Em

eral

d Pa

rk

0.89

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Unn

amed

Par

k (O

pal W

ay)

0.18

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Unn

amed

Par

k (O

ld W

ell S

ite)

0.31

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Tree

Cre

st G

arde

ns

2.2

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

Coo

lber

ia P

ark

0.21

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NY

18%

Woo

dcro

ft Pa

rk

0.36

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

NN

NY

24%

Cha

teau

Par

k 1.

2N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y47

%R

ails

Cre

scen

t Brid

le T

rail

1.2

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

53%

Lays

Par

k 0.

2N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y53

%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

Tota

l

LO

CA

L

Rec

reat

ion

Mou

nt N

asur

a

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Spor

t

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Kel

msc

ott

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

Mou

nt R

icho

n

LO

CA

L

Nat

ure

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

DIS

TR

ICT

Nat

ure

Page 28: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 5554

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

Bedf

ordd

ale

Hal

l9.

5Y

NY

YY

N1

NN

YN

NN

NN

N5

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N47

%Be

nBec

ula

Park

2.5

YY

YY

NN

1Y

YY

1N

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

62%

Chu

rchm

ans

Broo

k Pa

rk

1.8

YY

YY

YN

1N

NY

NN

NN

YN

2N

NN

NN

YY

YN

NN

67%

13.8

31

01

07

00

Unn

amed

Par

k (A

)8.

6Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(B)

3.8

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Unn

amed

Par

k (C

) 0.

93Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(D)

1.5

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Unn

amed

Par

k (E

)1.

2Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(F)

7.1

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Benb

ecua

Par

k (p

art)

1Y

YY

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y82

%Av

iem

ore

Park

1.

4Y

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N71

%Br

ian

O'n

eill

Mem

oria

l 0.

22N

NY

YY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YY

NY

Y76

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

G0.

4Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

H0.

19Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Ad

mira

l Roa

d Pa

rk

2.6

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Wal

lang

ara

Brid

le tr

ail

21N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%Sp

ringf

ield

Par

k3.

4N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N35

%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Bed

ford

dale

Tota

lL

OC

AL

Nat

ure

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

S por

tC

ross

Par

k7.

8Y

NY

YY

Y1

YY

Y7

11

NN

N14

N1

NN

NY

YY

YY

N75

%Li

na H

art P

ark

1.9

NN

YN

YY

1N

NY

NN

NN

NN

N1

NN

NN

NY

YN

YN

58%

Borre

llo P

ark

1.3

YY

YY

YN

1Y

YY

11

11

YN

NN

NN

NN

YY

YN

YY

82%

Rec

reat

ion

Slab

Gul

ly P

ark

0.6

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

52%

Unn

amed

Par

k (A

lben

s Va

le)

0.12

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

Unn

amed

Par

k (R

ubid

a R

ise)

0.19

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

Mos

eri P

ark

0.39

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Unn

amed

Par

k (In

dica

Cou

rt)0.

26N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y71

%H

elle

nic

Park

0.6

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Betta

enay

Par

k0.

61N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Se

fton

Park

0.08

9Y

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%W

inst

anle

y Pa

rk

1.7

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Hoo

kway

Par

k0.

88N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%W

arw

ick

Sava

ge P

ark

10N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N71

%Es

kdal

e Pa

rk

2.5

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Ston

egat

e Pa

rk

0.69

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Attu

nga

Park

0.

46N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Sho

ppin

g C

entre

)0.

23N

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N53

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Hol

den

rd)

0.17

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

53%

Gle

be P

ark

0.24

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Kurra

jong

Par

k 0.

63N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Pe

et P

ark

0.45

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Que

nda

Park

0.

17N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%H

all P

ark

0.87

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Alic

e Pa

rk

1N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y76

%M

acle

an P

ark

0.63

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

47%

Gar

land

Par

k0.

3N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N71

%U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Hig

h R

oad)

0.38

NN

NN

YN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Not

tingh

ill Pa

rk0.

15N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Lo

ckye

r Par

k0.

24Y

NN

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N71

%M

iche

al P

ark

0.6

YN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Win

dsor

Par

k 1.

2N

NY

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N71

%R

usse

llia P

ark

0.63

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

47%

Gilc

oe P

ark

0.19

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

65%

Unn

amed

Par

k (M

acki

e R

oad)

0.2

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Unn

amed

Par

k (C

royd

en R

oad)

0.32

NN

NN

N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

Y65

%C

allia

ndra

Par

k0.

16N

NY

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YY

NN

N65

%Sy

lvan

ia P

ark

4.9

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

71%

Unn

amed

Mac

lean

Stre

et D

rain

2.4

NN

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NY

71%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Size

Ha

Path

way

sB

ridg

esSi

gnag

eC

arPa

rkin

gA

cces

sL

ight

ing

Play

Bin

Dog

Bin

Seat

ing

Shel

ter

Publ

icT

oile

tB

BQ

Dri

nkFo

unta

inSh

ade

Sails

Art

Har

dC

ourt

sFi

tnes

sY

outh

C

omm

.G

arde

nM

en's

She

dD

og P

ark

Irri

gatio

nT

rees

Plan

ting

Sche

dule

dSp

orts

Kic

k-ab

out

Tur

fW

SUD

DIS

TR

ICT

spor

tSp

ringd

ale

Park

10Y

NN

YY

YN

YN

YN

N1

NN

N2

NN

NN

NY

YY

YY

N53

%R

ecre

atio

nKa

rragu

llen

Hal

l0.

42Y

NN

YN

NN

NN

NN

1N

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

N27

%Sp

ort

Karra

gulle

n O

val

4.9

YN

YY

YN

1Y

NY

1N

NN

NN

1N

NN

NN

YY

YY

YN

52%

Con

ifer P

ark

0.91

NN

YN

YN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

YN

NN

47%

Thom

as P

rice

Park

2.1

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NN

NY

YN

NN

59%

Faci

lity

Scor

e

Faci

lity

Scor

e

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

CO

MM

UN

ITY

GR

EE

N IN

FRA

STR

UC

TU

RE

CIR

CU

LA

TIO

NR

EC

RE

AT

ION

DIS

TR

ICT

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Kar

ragu

llen

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

Rol

eyst

one

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

L

1.Si

gnifi

cant

(80-

100)

1. L

ow

1. N

il1.

New

, 100

%30

%30

%10

%30

%10

0%1-

5Ye

ars

2. A

bove

Ave

rage

(6

0-80

)2.

Min

or2.

Not

cur

rent

ly

cons

ider

ed2.

Goo

d 5-

10Ye

ars

3. A

vera

ge (5

0-60

)3.

Ave

rage

3.

Lim

ited

Fund

ing

oppo

runi

ties

3. A

dequ

ate

10-1

5Ye

ars

4. M

inor

(25-

50)

4. A

bove

Av

erag

e4.

Fun

ding

op

poru

nitie

s4.

Wor

k re

quire

d

15 Year

s +

5. L

ow (0

-25)

5. S

igni

fican

t5.

Ded

icat

ed

fund

ing

avai

labl

e5.

End

of u

sefu

l lif

e/ne

w fa

cilit

yTo

tal

Scor

e.M

ax 2

0

TOTA

LW

EIG

HTE

DSC

OR

E1-

5ye

ars

5-10

year

s10

-15

year

sB

eyon

d 15

ye

ars

POS

Stra

tegy

POS

Cas

h In

Lie

uC

apita

l G

rant

s

DC

P

HA

RR

ISD

ALE

80

%D

IST

RIC

TSp

ort

Har

risda

le P

layi

ng F

ield

s 1

11

14

66

26

20.0

029

1

Willi

am L

ocka

rd P

ark

11

14

76

62

2438

.00

176

Jim

and

Alm

a Ba

rker

Par

k1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Shea

f Par

k 1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Sand

ston

e Pa

rk

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Gre

enlin

k Pa

rk1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Her

onw

ood

Park

1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Jim

and

Alm

a Ba

ker P

ark

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Tipu

ana

Park

2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Soth

erby

Par

k 2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Con

ical

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Silv

ersh

ot P

ark

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Wyo

min

g Pa

rk

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Sple

ndid

Par

k 1

11

36

66

26

20.0

029

1

Nor

ther

ly P

ark

21

13

712

62

1838

.00

176

Bays

tone

Par

k1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Cre

sted

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

War

bler

Par

k2

11

26

126

26

26.0

025

9

Gre

ensh

ank

Park

2

11

26

66

212

26.0

025

9

Fern

hill

Park

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Dov

edal

e Pa

rk (P

art)

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Unn

amed

Par

k (L

afay

ette

Ave

nue)

21

12

66

62

1226

.00

259

Vict

ory

Park

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

Lafa

yette

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Shep

herd

Par

k 2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Mos

sgre

en P

ark

21

12

66

62

1226

.00

259

Be

nalla

Par

k 1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Laur

aine

Par

k 1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Oak

leig

h Pa

rk1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Tola

rno

Park

2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Whi

teho

rse

Park

2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Jim

and

Alm

a Pa

rk1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Dov

edal

e Pa

rk (p

art)

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Park

Impr

ovem

ent P

lan

Indi

cativ

e Ti

mef

ram

ePo

tent

ial F

undi

ng S

ourc

es

P R I O R I T Y R A N K I N G

Park

s w

ith im

med

iate

fund

ing

avai

labi

lity

Park

s w

ith a

hig

h pr

iorit

y ra

nkin

g w

ithin

sub

urbs

with

low

ove

rall

faci

lity

Park

s w

ith a

hig

h pr

iorit

y ra

nkin

g w

ithin

sub

urbs

with

a re

ason

able

ov

eral

l fac

ility

scor

e bu

t no

fund

ing

Proj

ects

rank

ed h

ighl

y an

d w

ithin

su

burb

s w

ith re

ason

able

ove

rall

faci

lity

scor

e bu

t no

fund

ing

avai

labi

lity

Scor

es 1

-5W

eigh

ted

Scor

es

WEI

GH

TED

SC

OR

ES

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

SCO

RES

1-5

Nat

ure

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

App

endi

x B

Par

k Im

prov

emen

t Pla

n -

Full

List

Page 29: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 5756

Piar

a W

ater

s 71

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

Rec

reat

ion

Rob

ot P

ark

11

11

46

62

620

.00

291

Spor

tPi

ara

Wat

ers

Ova

l2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Burto

nia

Park

31

12

718

62

1238

.00

176

W

illow

dale

Par

k1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Free

sia

Park

11

11

46

62

620

.00

291

As

piri

Park

21

11

512

62

626

.00

259

Vi

llate

lla P

ark

31

44

1218

68

2456

.00

62

Erad

e Pa

rk3

14

412

186

824

56.0

062

Broa

dway

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Whi

ttake

r Par

k 4

11

28

246

212

44.0

013

7

Turin

Par

k 2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Berk

shire

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Ros

ette

Par

k 3

11

27

186

212

38.0

017

6

Bayo

nne

Park

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

M

arse

ille P

ark

31

12

718

62

1238

.00

176

Bl

uebe

ech

Park

4

11

28

246

212

44.0

013

7

Gue

rin P

ark

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

Ba

lliol C

ourt

Park

41

12

824

62

1244

.00

137

Le

roy

Park

2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Ruf

fle P

ark

31

12

718

62

1238

.00

176

M

orab

a Pa

rk (P

art)

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

M

ontic

ello

Par

k 2

11

48

126

224

44.0

013

7

Gen

omic

s Pa

rk

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

M

cPha

il Pa

rk1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Bedb

rook

Par

k2

11

26

126

212

32.0

022

8

Kello

gg P

ark

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

Ba

te P

ark

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

M

edw

ar P

ark

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

R

othe

ry P

ark

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Ros

site

r PO

S A)

21

12

612

62

1232

.00

228

C

lout

Par

k1

11

25

66

212

26.0

025

9

Aspi

ri Pa

rk (p

art)

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

To

rridg

e Pa

rk

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

M

orab

a Pa

rk (p

art)

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

To

rino

Park

11

12

56

62

1226

.00

259

Sk

eet R

oad

Basi

n 2

11

48

126

224

44.0

013

7

LO

CA

L

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

Hilb

ert

63%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Rec

reat

ion

Ger

alld

Rus

sel P

ark

32

13

918

122

1850

.00

99

Lette

rken

ny P

ark

12

13

76

122

1838

.00

176

Al

lwoo

d Pa

rk (P

art)

32

13

918

122

1850

.00

99

Nat

ure

Allw

ood

Park

22

13

812

122

1844

.00

137

Li

fford

Par

k2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Forr

estd

ale

60%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Willi

am a

nd A

lfred

Ske

et P

ark

42

44

1424

128

2468

.00

11

Skee

t Mem

oria

l Par

k2

23

411

1212

624

54.0

090

Le

ake

Stre

et P

ark

22

13

812

122

1844

.00

137

FB

PW P

arks

sw

ales

32

13

918

122

1850

.00

99

Cha

mpi

on L

akes

69%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

tPa

lam

ino

Park

42

12

924

122

1250

.00

99

Joe

Saun

ders

Par

k1

21

15

612

26

26.0

025

9

Cha

mpi

on B

each

Par

k2

21

16

1212

26

32.0

022

8

Nat

ure

Bill

Cla

re P

ark

12

12

66

122

1232

.00

228

Hay

nes

66%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Jarv

is P

ark

22

11

612

122

632

.00

228

M

arkw

ell P

ark

22

11

612

122

632

.00

228

Bro

okda

le39

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

beyo

nd 1

5 ye

ars

POS

Stra

tegy

POS

Cas

h In

Lie

uC

apita

l G

rant

s

DC

PD

on S

imm

ons

Park

24

13

1012

242

1856

.00

62

Har

ber P

ark

44

13

1224

242

1868

.00

11

Wal

laby

Par

k4

41

211

2424

212

62.0

033

Br

onze

win

g Pa

rk

44

12

1124

242

1262

.00

33

Mas

sel P

ark

44

12

1124

242

1262

.00

33

Flem

atti

Park

54

55

1930

2410

3094

.00

1

Ashw

orth

Par

k 4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

011

Ashw

orth

Par

k 2

44

13

1224

242

1868

.00

11

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

Nat

ure

LO

CA

L

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

tL

OC

AL

Nat

ure

Rec

reat

ion

Wun

gong

58%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

Nat

ure

Flet

cher

Par

k2

31

28

1218

212

44.0

013

7

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 1

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 2

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 3

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 4

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 5

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Rai

ls C

resc

ent B

ridle

Tra

il 6

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Sevi

lle G

rove

54

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

tBo

b Bl

ackb

urn

Park

33

33

1218

186

1860

.00

55

A14

San

Jaci

nta

Park

4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

M

athe

w S

tott

Park

3

31

310

1818

218

56.0

062

Ti

cklie

Par

k (P

art)

43

33

1324

186

1866

.00

25

A14

Nat

ure

Cila

ntro

Par

k 1

31

38

618

218

44.0

013

7

Bois

dale

Par

k1

31

16

618

26

32.0

022

8

Teal

Bro

ok P

ark

33

13

1018

182

1856

.00

62

Barry

Poa

d Pa

rk

43

33

1324

186

1866

.00

25

A14

L

OC

AL

Pam

plon

a Pa

rk

23

13

912

182

1850

.00

99

Cor

onda

le P

ark

(Par

t)4

33

313

2418

618

66.0

025

A1

4

Sem

inol

e Pa

rk

33

13

1018

182

1856

.00

62

Hes

keth

Par

k4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

Tick

lie P

ark

(Par

t)2

31

39

1218

218

50.0

099

M

orol

o Pa

rk4

33

313

2418

618

66.0

025

A1

4

Cor

onda

le P

ark

(Par

t)2

31

39

1218

218

50.0

099

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Lom

ond

Way

Dra

i5

33

415

3018

624

78.0

03

A1

4

Cam

illo

58%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Kuhl

Par

k1

31

16

618

26

32.0

022

8

Bill

and

Eva

Park

(Par

t) 3

31

29

1818

212

50.0

099

W

estfi

eld

Her

on P

ark

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Nat

ure

Bill

and

Eva

Nat

ure

Park

13

12

76

182

1238

.00

176

Gro

vela

nds

Park

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Red

Tin

gle

Park

43

13

1124

182

1862

.00

33

Wes

tfiel

d Pa

rk

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Troo

n Pa

rk4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

Nat

ure

Kend

al F

lora

Par

k2

31

28

1218

212

44.0

013

7

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

LO

CA

L

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Page 30: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 5958A

rmad

ale

41%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Mor

gan

Park

44

32

1324

246

1266

.00

25

B

G

wyn

ne P

ark

24

32

1112

246

1254

.00

90

Rec

reat

ion

Mem

oria

l Par

k2

45

415

1224

1024

70.0

010

Spor

tC

reyk

Par

k2

43

312

1224

618

60.0

055

Rec

reat

ion

Lion

s Pa

rk2

41

18

1224

26

44.0

013

7

Sanc

tuar

y La

ke3

41

210

1824

212

56.0

062

M

inna

war

ra P

ark

34

43

1418

248

1868

.00

11

R

eg W

illiam

s Pa

rk1

41

28

624

212

44.0

013

7

Wilc

anni

a/To

onga

bbie

Par

k4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

011

D

awso

n Pa

rk4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

011

Pe

lham

Par

k5

41

313

3024

218

74.0

07

Al

ders

on P

ark

44

13

1224

242

1868

.00

11

Rec

reat

ion

Bavi

ch P

ark

54

413

3024

024

78.0

03

D

amer

ham

Par

k4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

011

M

atro

n O

live

Gal

liers

Par

k4

41

211

2424

212

62.0

033

G

eorg

e Fo

ster

Par

k 4

41

312

2424

218

68.0

011

C

lem

ents

Par

k 5

41

313

3024

218

74.0

07

R

obin

Par

k5

41

414

3024

224

80.0

02

Se

xty

Park

44

11

1024

242

656

.00

62

Rot

ary

Park

24

12

912

242

1250

.00

99

Mog

o Pa

rk5

41

212

3024

212

68.0

011

H

orrie

Hill

Park

14

12

86

242

1244

.00

137

Nat

ure

Rin

gwoo

d Pa

rk4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

U

nnam

ed P

ark(

Ner

rigin

bro

ok p

rima

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

LO

CA

LU

nnam

ed P

ark

(Sev

ille D

rive

Entry

)4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Tai

t Stre

et /

Low

an4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Koo

tinga

l Stre

et)

43

13

1124

182

1862

.00

33

Unn

amed

Par

k (K

ootin

gal S

treet

)4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Hob

bs D

rive)

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Unn

amed

Par

k (G

irraw

een

Stre

etD

53

12

1130

182

1262

.00

33

Wye

e Pa

rk4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

Bu

rrow

a Pa

rk4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Fift

h R

oad

entry

)4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

Sh

eriff

Par

k4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

D

ale

Park

4

31

311

2418

218

62.0

033

Al

law

ah P

ark

43

13

1124

182

1862

.00

33

Unn

amed

Par

k (N

eerig

in B

rook

Dra

43

13

1124

182

1862

.00

33

Ange

lo P

ark

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Wer

ndle

y Pa

rk4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

W

illiam

Tur

ner P

ark

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

t

Kel

msc

ott

59%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Rus

hton

Par

k1

33

310

618

618

48.0

012

6

John

Dun

n Pa

rk3

33

312

1818

618

60.0

055

Mim

osa

Park

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

C

reyk

Nat

ure

Park

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

Ll

oyd

Hug

hes

Park

12

12

66

122

1232

.00

228

Spor

tFr

ye P

ark

23

42

1112

188

1250

.00

99

Brya

n G

ell P

ark

33

12

918

182

1250

.00

99

Fanc

ote

Park

23

13

912

182

1850

.00

99

Mig

rant

Par

k5

35

316

3018

1018

76.0

05

Bern

ice

Har

grav

e Pa

rk2

31

28

1218

212

44.0

013

7

Blac

kbur

ne P

ark

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Eric

a St

reet

Par

k4

35

416

2418

1024

76.0

05

G

Hea

ther

Loc

ke P

ark

23

13

912

182

1850

.00

99

Tollin

gton

Par

k2

31

28

1218

212

44.0

013

7

Fost

er P

ark

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Abin

gdon

Par

k2

31

28

1218

212

44.0

013

7

Apex

Par

k4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

Va

lent

ine

Park

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Gem

sarn

a Pa

rk

53

13

1230

182

1868

.00

11

Ran

ford

Par

k5

31

211

3018

212

62.0

033

Nat

ure

Broo

ksid

e Pa

rk (c

ombi

ned)

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

M

eyer

Par

k2

21

16

1212

26

32.0

022

8

Aspl

in P

ark

22

11

612

122

632

.00

228

W

right

Bro

ok P

ark

22

13

812

122

1844

.00

137

W

ard

Park

32

11

718

122

638

.00

176

Ar

bour

Par

k2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (G

illaim

Driv

e )

32

12

818

122

1244

.00

137

R

egin

a Pa

rk4

21

29

2412

212

50.0

099

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Spe

ncer

Roa

d)2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Cam

milo

Par

k 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Poss

um P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

G

oola

rmru

p Pa

rk2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Hic

k/Sa

vage

Par

k2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (R

anfo

rd S

treet

) 3

21

28

1812

212

44.0

013

7

Har

mer

sley

Par

k 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Mor

risio

n Pa

rk3

21

28

1812

212

44.0

013

7

Scot

t Par

k 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Hillt

op P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

t

Nat

ure

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

LO

CA

LR

ecre

atio

n

Mou

nt N

asur

a54

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

Der

ry P

ark

43

42

1324

188

1262

.00

33

HPa

tters

on P

ark

(Par

t)3

31

18

1818

26

44.0

013

7

Maz

zega

Par

k4

34

213

2418

812

62.0

033

Wan

doo

Park

22

22

812

124

1240

.00

174

Ba

mle

tt Pa

rk4

22

311

2412

418

58.0

059

Ad

air P

ark

52

23

1230

124

1864

.00

32

HC

arrig

g Pa

rk2

22

39

1212

418

46.0

013

2

Whi

tting

ton

Park

32

23

1018

124

1852

.00

94

Ellis

Par

k4

22

311

2412

418

58.0

059

Pa

tters

on P

ark

22

23

912

124

1846

.00

132

C

allo

w P

ark

42

23

1124

124

1858

.00

59

Rus

hton

Par

k 2

22

39

1212

418

46.0

013

2

Wes

tvie

w P

ark

32

23

1018

124

1852

.00

94

Unn

amed

Par

k (H

enrie

tta A

venu

e)3

22

310

1812

418

52.0

094

M

azze

ga P

ark

(Par

t)2

22

39

1212

418

46.0

013

2

Hen

rietta

Par

k3

22

310

1812

418

52.0

094

Pe

acef

ul P

ond

Park

12

23

86

124

1840

.00

174

C

arra

dain

e Pa

rk

32

23

1018

124

1852

.00

94

Mou

nt R

icho

n54

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Rec

reat

ion

Tred

ale

Park

43

44

1524

188

2474

.00

7

E

Amet

hyst

Par

k 3

23

311

1812

618

54.0

090

Er

rol G

reen

Par

k1

23

28

612

612

36.0

022

6

Nee

rigen

Bro

ok P

ark

12

32

86

126

1236

.00

226

Em

eral

d Pa

rk

32

32

1018

126

1248

.00

126

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Opa

l Way

)3

23

210

1812

612

48.0

012

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (O

ld W

ell)

32

32

1018

126

1248

.00

126

Tr

ee C

rest

Gar

dens

Par

k2

23

29

1212

612

42.0

017

3

Coo

lber

ia P

ark

52

33

1330

126

1866

.00

25

E

W

oodc

roft

Park

5

23

313

3012

618

66.0

025

E

Cha

teau

Par

k 4

23

211

2412

612

54.0

090

R

ails

Cre

scen

t Brid

le T

rail

32

32

1018

126

1248

.00

126

La

ys P

ark

32

32

1018

126

1248

.00

126

LO

CA

L

Rec

reat

ion

Nat

ure

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

Page 31: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale City of Armadale 6160B

edfo

rdda

le60

%H

IER

AR

CH

YFU

NC

TIO

NPa

rkFa

cilit

y Sc

ore

Nee

dA

vaila

bilit

y of

Fu

ndin

gA

sset

Con

ditio

n

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

Bedf

ordd

ale

Hal

l4

31

412

2418

224

68.0

011

Be

nBec

ula

Park

33

44

1418

188

2468

.00

11

Chu

rchm

ans

Broo

k Pa

rk

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Unn

amed

Par

k (A

)2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (B

)2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (C

) 2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (D

)2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (E

)2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (F

)2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Benb

ecua

(par

t) 1

21

26

612

212

32.0

022

8

Avie

mor

e Pa

rk

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

Br

ian

O'N

eill

Mem

oria

l 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k G

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

U

nnam

ed P

ark

H2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Adm

iral R

oad

Park

3

21

39

1812

218

50.0

099

W

alla

ngar

a Br

idle

Tra

il 2

21

38

1212

218

44.0

013

7

Sprin

gfie

ld P

ark

42

13

1024

122

1856

.00

62

Rol

eyst

one

64%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

Spor

tC

ross

Par

k1

32

39

618

418

46.0

013

2

Lina

Har

t Par

k4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

Bo

rrello

Par

k2

31

39

1218

218

50.0

099

Rec

reat

ion

Slab

Gul

ly P

ark

43

12

1024

182

1256

.00

62

Unn

amed

Par

k (A

lben

s Va

le)

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Rub

ida

Ris

e)2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Mos

eri P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Indi

ca C

ourt)

22

13

812

122

1844

.00

137

H

elle

nic

Park

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

Be

ttaen

ay P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

Se

fton

Park

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

W

inst

anle

y Pa

rk

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

H

ookw

ay P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

W

arw

ick

Sava

ge P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

Es

kdal

e Pa

rk

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

St

oneg

ate

Park

2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Attu

nga

Park

2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (S

hopp

ing

Cen

tre)

32

13

918

122

1850

.00

99

Unn

amed

Par

k (H

olde

n R

oad)

32

12

818

122

1244

.00

137

G

lebe

Par

k 3

21

28

1812

212

44.0

013

7

Kurra

jong

Par

k 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Peet

Par

k 3

21

28

1812

212

44.0

013

7

Que

nda

Park

2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Hal

l Par

k2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Alic

e Pa

rk

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

M

acle

an P

ark

42

12

924

122

1250

.00

99

Gar

land

Par

k2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (H

igh

Roa

d)2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Not

tingh

ill Pa

rk2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Lock

yer P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

M

iche

al P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

W

inds

or P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

R

usse

llia P

ark

42

12

924

122

1250

.00

99

Gilc

oe P

ark

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

U

nnam

ed P

ark

(Mac

kie

Roa

d)3

21

28

1812

212

44.0

013

7

Unn

amed

Par

k (C

royd

en R

oad)

22

12

712

122

1238

.00

176

C

allia

ndra

Par

k2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Sylv

ania

Par

k 2

21

27

1212

212

38.0

017

6

Unn

amed

Par

k (M

acle

an S

treet

Dra

22

13

812

122

1844

.00

137

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Rec

reat

ion

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

Kar

ragu

llen

44%

HIE

RA

RC

HY

FUN

CT

ION

Park

Faci

lity

Scor

eN

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

et C

ondi

tion

TOTA

LSC

OR

E.M

ax 2

0

Faci

lity

Scor

e N

eed

Ava

ilabi

lity

of

Fund

ing

Ass

etC

ondi

tion

TOTA

LPR

IOR

ITY

RA

NK

ING

1-5

year

s5-

10ye

ars

10-1

5ye

ars

Bey

ond

15

year

sPO

SSt

rate

gyPO

S C

ash

In L

ieu

Cap

ital

Gra

nts

D

CP

DIS

TR

ICT

spor

tSp

ringd

ale

Park

33

33

1218

186

1860

.00

55

Rec

reat

ion

Karra

gulle

n H

all

53

12

1130

182

1262

.00

33

Spor

tKa

rragu

llen

Ova

l4

31

210

2418

212

56.0

062

Con

ifer P

ark

43

13

1124

182

1862

.00

33

Thom

as P

rice

Park

33

13

1018

182

1856

.00

62

LO

CA

LN

atur

e

NE

IGH

BO

UR

HO

OD

Page 32: Parks Facilities Strategy · The City of Armadale’s Parks Facilities Strategy aims to strengthen the design, implementation and management of public open space and associated infrastructure

City of Armadale 62

armadale.wa.gov.au