paris outcomes 2016

85
Understanding the climate regime post Paris: COP 21 update Tim Cadman Institute for Ethics Governance and Law Griffith University http://www.climateregimemap.net

Upload: tim-cadman

Post on 19-Feb-2017

473 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Paris outcomes 2016

Understanding the climate regime post

Paris: COP 21 update

Tim CadmanInstitute for Ethics Governance and LawGriffith University

http://www.climateregimemap.net

Page 2: Paris outcomes 2016

PublicationsClimate Change and Global Policy Regimes: Towards Institutional LegitimacyPalgrave-Macmillan – IPE Series (April 2013)

Quality and legitimacy of global governance: case lessons from forestry. London and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, International Political Economy Series(March 2011)

Ethical Values and the Integrity of the Climate Change Regime: Ashgate Law, Ethics and Governance Series (2015)

2

The Political Economy of Sustainable Development: Policy Instruments and Market Mechanisms: Edward Elgar(2015)

Page 3: Paris outcomes 2016

Publications

3

Page 4: Paris outcomes 2016

WARNING: THIS PRESENTATION HAS FREQUENT USE OF

ACRONYMNS

Page 5: Paris outcomes 2016

Contents

5

• The policy implications of climate change• Background to COP 21• Mapping the regime• Negotiating text contents• Discussion

Page 6: Paris outcomes 2016

Policy implications of climate change: IPCC Fifth Assessment Review

• Human induced climate change has raised the temperature by 10C• Likely to reach 4-60C by the end of the century • Convention signatories recognised in 2009 a rise above 20C would

result in dangerous climate change• Current levels of CO2 emissions are at 5t per person, with total

emissions of about 36 billion tonnes p.a. • To keep to the 20C, emissions will have decline to something around

1.2-1.5 tonnes per capita p.a. by the 2050, given population increases • According to recent data, US emissions per capita in 2012 were 16-17

tonnes per person p.a.• Dramatic “deep decarbonisation” of energy systems to stay at 20C

– It would be “complete irresponsibility” if the effort were not made– United States cutting the per capita emissions by a factor of ten

• worldwide effort to accelerate progress on low carbon energy systems and high efficiency is essential

6

Page 7: Paris outcomes 2016

• Took place in the aftermath of the Paris attacks: civil society/government tensions

• Rising public awareness and civil society pressure to take action

• Genuine effort to provide space for civil society and non-state actors (but less so in the negotiations)

Background

Page 8: Paris outcomes 2016
Page 9: Paris outcomes 2016

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Conference/Meeting of Parties

Kyoto Protocol / New arrangement 

Permanent Subsidiary bodies (SBSTA, SBI)

Subsidiary bodies (Finance, etc.)

AdaptationMitigation

Market mechanisms

(CDM, REDD+, etc.)

Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions

(NAMAs)

National Adaptation Programmes of Action

(NAPAs)

Loss & Damage Mechanism

National activities & Reporting

Climate Change Secretariat

Figure 3: Schematic outline of the climate regime

Mapping the climate change regime

9

Page 10: Paris outcomes 2016

Mapping the climate change regime: cont.

Figure 5: Comprehensive map of the climate regime – thematic areas highlighted (late draft) 10

Page 11: Paris outcomes 2016

LEVEL Description

CONVENTION Enabling global instrument – UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

CONFERENCE Signatory member states (Parties) meet to make decisions, made up of many different ‘blocs’ – G77, EU etc.

PROTOCOL/OTHER INSTRUMENT

Operating legal mechanism – Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement (2016)

SECRETARIAT Responsible for management of COP and tasks under Protocol, etc.

PERMANENT SUBSIDIARY BODIES

Responsible for implementation and scientific aspects of Protocol, etc.(SBSTA, SBI, etc.)

FINANCE Various delivering climate finance from developed to developing countries

IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES

Governmental and non-governmental bodies responsible for funded programmes & projects

NATIONAL LEVEL ACTIVITIES

Actions required of Parties to implemented at the national/government level

REPORTING Monitoring reporting and verification of commitments and actions

Index

Page 12: Paris outcomes 2016
Page 13: Paris outcomes 2016

COP 21 28/11/-12/12 2015: Negotiating text contents

Page 14: Paris outcomes 2016
Page 15: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• Largely replaces the Kyoto Protocol (although various implementation commitments will remain such as those included in the Doha Amendment).

• The Ad Hoc Working Group for Advancing the Durban Platform (ADP, the main negotiating body prior to and during the Paris Conference of Parties (COP 21) was disbanded,

• Replaced by the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement (AWP). • The CMA (Conference of Parties Meeting as Parties to the Agreement) will

now complement the CMP (Conference of Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol). – Many of the administrative, oversight and decision-making powers of the new

Agreement will reside with this body. • open for signature in New York 22 April 2016 to 21 April 2017 (1, 2)

– Requires ‘at least 55 Parties to the Convention’, counting for ‘at least an estimated 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions’ to come into force

15

Page 16: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes1. This Agreement, in enhancing the implementation of the Convention,

including its objective, aims to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change, in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty, including by:

a) Holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change;

b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production;

c) Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

2. This Agreement will be implemented to reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.

16

Page 17: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomesIntended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) (mitigation) • “the estimated aggregate greenhouse gas emission levels in 2025

and 2030 resulting from the intended nationally determined contributions do not fall within least-cost 2 C scenarios ̊ ”(17)

• Parties: Must continually improve INDCs– Report new INDC for 2025 by 2020 (2025 NDCs) (23)– Report new INDC for 2030 by 2020 (20330 NDCS) (24)– Report 9-12 months in advance of relevant COP (25)

a) provide consistent contents (time frame, scope, etc.) b) how it ‘considers’ it is fair and ambitious, c) how it meets 2o/1.5o target of Article 2

– ‘invites’ to provide ‘mid-century, long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies’ by 2020

• Secretariat (CCS)– Create Interim INDC registry

17

Page 18: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• A Global Stocktake process for nationally

determined contributions (NDCs), and a registry of contributions will be established under the Climate Change Secretariat (CCS).

18

Page 19: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• A mechanism to facilitate implementation and compliance will also be established. – ‘Enhanced action’ ‘ensure the highest possible

mitigation efforts’ pre-2020 (2016-2020) is also to be put in place

– Previously there was a compliance committee and related entities that sit under the Kyoto Protocol, but not more broadly.

19

Page 20: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• Developing countries generally fared well, notably the recognition of the need for technology transfer and capacity building. – Agreement also establishes a Paris Committee on

Capacity Building (PCCB – with a Work Plan 2016-2020).

– Acknowledging the necessity for increased action on technology transfer and development, the Technology Mechanism (TM) will now sit under a Technology Framework

20

Page 21: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• Loss and Damage caused by climate change– The Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and

Damage (WIM) will continue (with a review in 2016), and – will act a clearing-house for risk transfer to help Parties

create and put risk management strategies in place. – Establish a task force to recommend ‘integrated

approaches to avert, minimize and address displacement related to the adverse impacts of climate change’ (50)

– Operationalise and report on progress of 49 & 50 (51)• But ‘does not involve or provide a basis for any

liability or compensation’ (51)21

Page 22: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes• Finance

– The Standing Committee on Finance (SCF) will continue to serve Agreement under responsibilities identified by COP.

– The Green Climate Fund (GCF) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) will continue to co-exist, with both acting as operational entities for climate finance under Agreement.

– The GCF will also be enabled to provide support for Least Developed Countries’ (LDCs) National Adaptation Plans (NAPs).

– Developed countries will continue funding for ‘meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation’ with a ‘floor’ of $100 Billion, and to set a new goal in 2025

– ‘Recognises’ value of ‘results based payments’ in relation to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) 22

Page 23: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

• Market mechanisms – ‘Mechanism to contribute to greenhouse gas emissions’

(possible code for emissions trading) will also be established, and

– Effort will be made to ensure there is a system of accounting to avoid double accounting of emissions reductions.

– Efforts will be also made to encourage Parties and other stakeholders to voluntarily cancel certified emissions reductions (CERs – ‘carbon credits’/’carbon offsets’) under second commitment period of Kyoto,

– Transfers of credits (this is to allow them back into the trading system to keep the Clean Development Mechanism

(CDM) alive – possibly. 23

Page 24: Paris outcomes 2016

Paris Agreement: Summary of outcomes

Transparency• ‘create a ‘Capacity-building Initiative for

Transparency’ (CIT) – ‘build institutional and technical capacity, both pre-

and post-2020’– Support developing countries to provide ‘enhanced

transparency requirements’ Developing countries have ‘flexibility in implementation of provisions’

24

Page 25: Paris outcomes 2016

Parties shall cooperate in taking measures, as appropriate, to enhance climate change education, training, public awareness, public participation and public access to information, recognizing the importance of these steps with respect to enhancing actions under this Agreement.

25

Article 12: Public awareness and participation

Page 26: Paris outcomes 2016

Conclusions• Well done, Paris.

– Public transport was impeccable– Civil society zone at Le Bourget commendable,

• Agreement is good, and tries to ‘troubleshoot’• ‘Shall’ provisions (esp. re INDCs and mitigation) are commendable • Greater emphasis, and certainty on adaptation, will stimulate

investmentBUT• Climate talks themselves were not transparent• Relationship between KP market mechanisms for mitigation (offsets)

e.g. CDM and Paris unclear:– Mixed signals, not good for ‘green’ growth: back to square one?

• A lot of tasks, and a lot of definitions to clear up before COP 22 – realistic?

• Still a lot of ‘may’ provisions nested inside ‘shall’ clauses: too much wiggle room?

• Too much to achieve by COP 22 – and 2020 (too ambitious an agenda?)SCORE OUT OF TEN: 7 – enough to save the planet?

26

Page 27: Paris outcomes 2016

Thank [email protected]

@tim_cadman

timcadman.wordpress.com

Page 28: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Decisions giving effect to the agreement117 decisions in all relating to

– Mitigation (22-41 [35 deleted]) – Adaptation (42-47)– Loss and damage (48-52)– Finance (53-65)– Technology development and transfer (66-71)– Capacity Building (72-84)– Transparency of action and support (85-99)– Global stocktake (100-102)– Facilitation implementation and compliance (103-104)– Timeliness (‘final clauses’) (105)– Enhanced action prior to 2020 (106-133)– Non-Party stakeholders (134-137)– Admin. (138-140) 28

Page 29: Paris outcomes 2016

• Article 1: Definitions refer back to Convention (UNFCCC)• Article 2: Strengthen response to climate change (CC) (‘well below 2oC)• Article 3: Nationally determined contributions to reduce emissions• Article 4: Details how Parties will deliver NDCs• Article 5: Enhancing sinks and reservoirs of GHGs, ‘including forests’• Article 6: Voluntary mitigation ‘mechanisms’ to meet NDCs• Article 7: Enhancing adaptation activities• Article 8: Measures for addressing loss and damage from CC• Article 9: Provision of Finance• Article 10: Technology development and transfer• Article 11: Capacity building • Article 12: Public awareness and participation (very short)• Article 13: Transparency of action• Article 14: Global Stocktake• Article 15: Scope of mechanism for implementation and compliance• Article 16: Administrative arrangements• Article 17: Role of the Climate Change Secretariat under Agreement• Article 18 – 19: Roles of subsidiary bodies• Articles 20: Ratification arrangements• Article 21: Entry into force• Articles 22-29: other administrative arrangements 29

Summary of articles of the Agreement

Page 30: Paris outcomes 2016

PreambleI. AdoptionII. Intended Nationally Determined ContributionsIII. Decisions giving effect to the agreementIV. Enhanced action prior to 2020V. Non-party stakeholdersVI. Administrative and budgetary mattersAnnex – Paris Agreement

30

Page 31: Paris outcomes 2016

Recognition of the ‘urgent’ need to• address the significant gap between the aggregate

effect of Parties’ mitigation pledges … with holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre- industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C”

• accelerate the implementation of the Convention and its Kyoto Protocol

• enhance the provision of finance, technology and capacity-building support by developed country Parties

31

Preamble

Page 32: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Adoption• open for signature in New York 22 April 2016 to 21 April 2017

(1, 2)– Requires ‘at least 55 Parties to the Convention’, counting for ‘at least

an estimated 55 percent of the total global greenhouse gas emissions’ to come into force

• Closure of ADP (Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action) (6)– Replaced by AWP (Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement)

(7)• Prepare for Agreement and first Meeting of Parties under the Agreement

[CMA] (8)• Creation of a related work programme (9)• Oversee implementation of the Agreement (10)• Meet in conjunction with COP and complete its work “by the first session of

the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement” [CMA] (11) 32

Page 33: Paris outcomes 2016

2. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs)

• Welcomed and recognised INDCs that Parties provided, called on other Parties that did not, to submit (12,13)– “as soon as possible and well in advance of the twenty-second session of the

Conference of the Parties (November 2016)” (13)• INDCS be published on unfccc.int (14) • Reiterated calls for developed country finance (15)• Noted IPCC synthesis report (SR) (16) ‘with concern’ that

– “the estimated aggregate greenhouse gas emission levels in 2025 and 2030 resulting from the intended nationally determined contributions do not fall within least-cost 2 C scenarios ̊ ”(17)

• Noting related developing country adaptation needs (18) requested an updated SR (19) and called for a

• ‘Facilitative dialogue’ in 2018 to ‘take stock’ of collective efforts (20), and

• Get a report from the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the impacts of warming above 1.5o (21) 33

Page 34: Paris outcomes 2016

3. MitigationLargely about intended NDCs (INDCs), but other admin. arrangements, mechanisms, etc.• Parties:

– Submit INDCs upon ratification of Agreement if not already done (22)– Report new INDC for 2025 by 2020 (2025 NDCs) (23)– Report new INDC for 2030 by 2020 (20330 NDCS) (24)– Report 9-12 months in advance of relevant COP (25)– Parties to (27)

a) provide consistent contents (time frame, scope, etc.) b) how it ‘considers’ it is fair and ambitious, c) how it meets 2o/1.5o target of Article 2

– ‘Shall’ apply AWP guidance (see 31 below) future INDCs and ‘may’ to current (32)

– ‘invites’ to provide ‘mid-century, long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies’ by 2020 (34) 34

Page 35: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Mitigation

• AWP to provide ‘guidance’ to Parties for adoption by first CMA on:– ‘features’ of NDCs (26)– Scope of information in INDCs (transparency) (28)– Methods for accounting INDCs based on (31):

a) Methods and metrics assessed by IPCCb) Methodological consistencyc) Inclusivity of emissions/reduction contributionsd) Justify exclusions

35

Page 36: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Mitigation• Subsidiary Bodies– SBI to Provide advice on INDC Registry (A4.12) (29)– Forum on the Impact of the Implementation of response measures

(est. COP 16) to continue and serve new Agreement (33)– SBI & SBSTA:

• to recommend ‘modalities, work programme and functions’ of Forum (34; [35 deleted])

• develop methods to avoid ‘double counting’ in INDCs (‘adjustment by Parties for both anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks’) [A6.2] (37)

• Develop ‘rules, modalities and procedures’ for new mitigation mechanism [A6.2 – see under COP below] (39)

• Develop work programme for ‘non-market approaches’ [A6.8] including linkages to other activities, as well as ‘implementation and coordination’, as well as a draft Decision for adoption at 1st CMA (40, 41)

36

Page 37: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Mitigation• Secretariat (CCS)

– Create Interim INDC registry containing existing NDCs by 2016 (30)– Publish parties’ ‘mid-century, long-term low greenhouse gas

emission development strategies’ on unfccc.int (36)• COP

– ‘recommends’ COP ‘adopt rules, modalities and procedures’ (38) for a ‘mechanism to contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and support sustainable development’ [A6.2], covering:

a) Voluntary participationb) ‘real measurable long term benefits’ of mitigation activitiesc) Scope of activitiesd) Additional mitigation activities ‘that would otherwise occur’

(additionality)e) ‘Verification and certification’ of mitigation activities via designated

operational entities (DoEs)f) ‘Experience gained and lesson learned from mechanisms’ previously

37

Page 38: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Adaptation• Adaptation Committee (AC) and Least Developed Countries

Expert Group (LEG)– ‘request’ develop ‘modalities’ to determine adaptation ‘efforts’,

recommendation for adoption to first meeting CMA (42)– Work with Standing Committee on Finance and others to recommend

to CMA 1 (46)a) Measures for mobilization of support for developing countries under 2/1.5

degree scenariob) Review effectiveness of adaptation support under A7.14c

• AC to recommend to 1st CMA (43)a) Review exiting work arrangements for adaptation to increase

coherenceb) develop methods for assessing developing countries adaptation

needs38

Page 39: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Adaptation

• UN agencies and financial institutions– ‘invites’ to present evidence as to how climate finance

and development projects have ‘climate proofing’ and ‘resilience measures’ (44)

• Parties– ‘requests’ strengthen regional adaptation co-operation

esp. in developing countries (45)• Green Climate Fund (GCF)– ‘requests’ ‘expedite support’ to developing countries

for developing national adaptation plans (NAP) and implementing them (47)

39

Page 40: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Loss and Damage• ‘Decides’ Warsaw international mechanism on loss and

damage (WIM) to continue, subject to 2016 review (48)• ‘requests’ WIM Executive Committee to:

– ‘establish a clearinghouse for risk transfer’ to help parties ‘develop and implement comprehensive risk management strategies’ (49)

– Establish a task force to recommend ‘integrated approaches to avert, minimize and address displacement related to the adverse impacts of climate change’ (50)

– Operationalise and report on progress of 49 & 50 (51)• ‘Agrees’ that A8 of agreement ‘does not involve or

provide a basis for any liability or compensation’ (51)40

Page 41: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Finance• ‘Decides’ Finance to developing country action of implementation

of Agreement relates to both adaptation and mitigation under A2 (53)

• ‘decides’ developed countries will continue funding for ‘meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation’ with a ‘floor’ of $100 Billion, and to set a new goal in 2025 (54)

• ‘Recognises’ value of ‘results based payments’ in relation to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD), including sustainable forest management (SFM) generally, joint mitigation/adaptation, non-carbon benefits, role of GCF and other funding sources, (55)

• Decides to develop reporting requirements on developed country funding via 1st CMA at COP 22 [A9.5] (56), and subject to (96) below (57) (see also 58)

41

Page 42: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Finance• SBSTA

– ‘Requests’ ‘develop modalities for the accounting of [public] financial resources’ by COP 24 2018 (58)

• GCF and Global Environment Facility (GEF)– ‘Decides’ remain principal finance delivery agencies under the Financial Mechanism

(FM), with Least developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) continue to be managed by GEF (59)

• Adaptation Fund (AF)– ‘Recognizes’ Continue to serve Kyoto Protocol (KP) and Agreement, under CMP and CMA

(60) subject to decisions of COP (61)• CMA

– ‘Recommends’ Provide guidance to COP on ‘policies, programme priorities and eligibility criteria related to the Agreement’ relevant to FM (62)

• FM– ‘decides’ existing decisions pre Agreement stand, ‘mutatis mutandis’ (63)

• SCF– ‘decides’ role established by COP, will also serve to assist Agreement 64)

• ‘Institutions serving the Agreement’– ‘urges’ delivery of finance through ‘simplified and efficient application and approval

procedures’ (65) 42

Page 43: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Technology development and transfer

• ‘Decides’ to ‘strengthen’ the Technology Mechanism (TM) (67) and undertake ‘periodic review’ of its effectiveness re Agreement (70)

• Technology Executive Committee (TEC) and Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN)– ‘Notes’ report of ‘needs assessments’ (66)– ‘decides’ undertake further technology research, development and

demonstration (67a), and enhance ‘endogenous’ capacities (67b)– Report to COP/CMA via SBs on its activities supporting implementation

of Agreement (69)• SBI

– ‘Requests’ it elaborates of ‘the scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment’ of TM in the light of the CTCN review (CP.2/17 ann. vii, 20) and Global Stocktake (A14) (71)

43

Page 44: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Capacity building

• ‘Decides’ to establish the Paris Committee on Capacity-building (PCCB) to – ‘address gaps and needs, …in implementing

capacity-building in developing country Parties’ – ‘enhance capacity-building efforts…• with regard to coherence and coordination in …

activities under the Convention’ (72)

44

Page 45: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Capacity building• PPCB

– Manage and oversee work plan (73): ‘decides’ -a) ‘Increase synergies through cooperation and avoid duplication among existing

bodies’b) Identify ‘capacity gaps and needs and how to address them’c) Promote methods for capacity buildingd) Foster multi-level cooperatione) Identify lessons from existing bodiesf) Explore how developing countries can take greater control of c-bg) Identify opportunities for increased c-b at national and sub-national levelsh) Foster collaboration between existing bodiesi) Provide guidance to CCS on capacity-building Portal (74)

– Annually focus on a specific area of capacity building (75)– ‘Decides’ ‘Inputs’ to PCCB will include submissions assessing effectiveness of

the 3rd review of the implementation of Capacity Building Framework (CBF) (80)

– Parties submit ‘views’ on PCCB membership by March 2016 (76)– Requests prepare ‘annual technical progress reports’ (81)

45

Page 46: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Capacity building• COP

– ‘Requests’ Provide an assessment of PCCB at COP 25 (2019)• CMA

– Review PCCB subject to A11.5 1st (‘shall, at its first session, consider and adopt a decision on the initial institutional arrangements for capacity-building’ [A11.5]) (82)

– explore ways of enhancing the implementation of • Parties

– ‘Calls upon’ ‘ensure education, training and public awareness ’ are part of c-b contributions as per A12 (83)

– ‘Invites’ ‘enhance training, public awareness, public participation and public access to information’ for c-b under Agreement (84)

46

Page 47: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Transparency of action and support

• ‘Decides’ to create a ‘Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency’ (CIT) (85) to– ‘build institutional and technical capacity, both pre- and

post-2020’– Support developing countries to provide ‘enhanced

transparency requirements’ required under A13 (85)– Use 7th review of FM to assess CIT (88)– Developing countries have ‘flexibility in implementation of

provisions’ [A13.2] (90)– Under A13.7-10 least developed countries (LDCs) ‘shall’

submit information no less frequently’ than bi-annually but ‘may’ submit at their discretion (?)(91)

47

Page 48: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Transparency of action and support

• CIT – ‘decides’(86) aims:a) strengthen national institutions b) provide relevant tools, training and assistance for

A13c) Help improve transparency ‘over time’ (86)

• GEF – ‘urges and requests’– Assist CIT establishment via 6th replenishment

round of funding (87)– Report on progress in establishment at COP 22

2016 (89)48

Page 49: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Transparency of action and support

• AWP – ‘requests’– Develop ‘modalities, procedures and guidelines’ following

A13.13, to be presented to 1st CMA, but ‘considered’ at COP 24 2018 (92), to take into account (93):• ‘facilitating improved reporting and transparency over time’• ‘Flexibility’ for developing countries given capacity• ‘promote transparency, accuracy, completeness, consistency,

and comparability’• ‘avoid duplication’ and ‘undue burden’ on CCS and Parties• Parties maintain ‘frequency and quality of reporting’• Avoid ‘double accounting’• ‘ensure environmental integrity’

49

Page 50: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Transparency of action and support• AWP – ‘requests’

– Develop ‘modalities, procedures and guidelines’ following A13.13, to be presented to 1st CMA, but ‘considered’ at COP 24 2018 (92), to take into account (93):

a) ‘facilitating improved reporting and transparency over time’b) ‘Flexibility’ for developing countries given capacityc) ‘promote transparency, accuracy, completeness, consistency, and comparability’d) ‘avoid duplication’ and ‘undue burden’ on CCS and Partiese) Parties maintain ‘frequency and quality of reporting’f) Avoid ‘double accounting’g) ‘ensure environmental integrity’

– As well as (95)a) ‘types of flexibility’b) Consistency between INDC reporting-, and progress-, methodologiesc) Reporting includes actions, and plans, including NAPd) Support provided for adaptation and mitigation taking SBSTA methods into accounte) Information on biennial assessments, SCF reports, and other bodiesf) ‘Information on the social and economic impacts of response measures’

50

Page 51: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Transparency of action and support

• AWP – ‘requests’ (cont.)– Draw on experiences of other processes (94)– Enhance transparency of support from developed

countries [A9] (96)– Provide a progress report on modalities no later

than 2018 (97)– modalities, procedures & guidelines enter into

force with Paris Agreement (98)– Will ultimately replace measurement reporting and

verification (MRV) under 1/CP.16 (99)51

Page 52: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Global Stocktake• AWP – ‘requests’ to

– ‘identify the sources of input for the global stocktake’ [A14] (100) including a) information on:

i. ‘overall effect’ of INDCsii. State of play on ‘adaptation efforts’ [A7.10-11; A13.7]iii. ‘The mobilization and provision of support’ b) Latest IPCC reportsc) Latest SB reports– Provide recommendations on IPCC information to 2nd CMA (101) – see

below– ‘Develop modalities for the global stocktake’ for 1st CMA (103)

• SBSTA – ‘requests’– How information from IPCC assessments can inform stocktake [A14],

[for AWP to make recommendations to 2nd CMA] (101)52

Page 53: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Facilitating implementation and compliance

• A15 creates a ‘mechanism to facilitate implementation of and promote compliance’, and A2 establishes a ‘committee’: (103) ‘decides’ ‘12 members with recognized competence’ following geographical/regional conventions– AWP to develop ‘modalities and procedures’ (104)

53

Page 54: Paris outcomes 2016

3. Final Clauses

• CCS – ‘requests’– As per A12 to publish national greenhouse gas

emissions on UNFCCC.int based on ‘national communications, greenhouse gas inventory reports, biennial reports or biennial update reports’

54

Page 55: Paris outcomes 2016

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (mitigation)

• ‘Resolves’ to ‘ensure the highest possible mitigation efforts’ pre-2020 (106)– Parties

a) ‘urging’ ‘ratify and implement’ Doha Amendmentb) ‘urging’ ‘make and implement’ a mitigation pledge under Cancun Agreementsc) ‘resolve’ to ‘accelerate the full implementation of the decisions’; ‘enhance ambition’

pre-2020: ‘to ensure the highest possible mitigation efforts’ d) ‘inviting’ developing countries to submit outstanding biennial assessmentse) ‘urging’ participation in Cancun MRV processes

• ‘Encourages’ Parties to ‘promote’ Parties and non-Parties to ‘voluntarily’ cancel their CERs in the second commitment period [for re-sale – ed.] (107)

• ‘Urges’ ‘host and purchasing Parties’ to report ‘transparently’ on their ‘internationally transferred mitigation outcomes’ under KP to ‘promote environmental integrity and avoiding double counting’ (108)

• ‘Recognises’ “social, economic and environmental value of voluntary mitigation actions’ (109)

55

Page 56: Paris outcomes 2016

• ‘Resolves’ to ‘strengthen’ ‘technical examination process on mitigation’ (110) by:

a) ‘Encouraging’ participation of Partiesb) ‘strive to improve’ participation by Party and non-Party expertsc) ‘Request’ TEC and CTCN

i. ‘Engage’ in meetingsii. Provide ‘regular updates’iii. Report to COP on their activities in this process

d) ‘Encourage’ parties to make use of CTCN• ‘Encourages’ FM operating entities [GCF GEF] to participate in technical

expert meetings (111)• ‘Requests’ CCS to ‘organize the process’ (112):

a) Organize expert presentations, with help of TECb) Update on process annuallyc) Prepare summaries

• ‘Decides’ process to be co-organized by SBSTA/SBI ‘ongoing basis’ to 2020 (113)

• ‘Decides’ to conduct process effectiveness review in 2017 (114)56

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (mitigation)

Page 57: Paris outcomes 2016

• ‘Resolves’ to – ‘Enhance’ finance, technology and capacity-building by

developed countries and – ‘strongly urges’ developed countries to ‘scale up’ funding via

‘concrete roadmap’ to goal of USD$100 billion annually for adaptation and mitigation, and

– ‘ increasing adaptation finance from current levels’– further provide appropriate technology and capacity-building

(115)• ‘Decides’ to

– hold a ‘facilitative dialogue’ at COP 22 to ‘assess progress’ and ‘enhance…resources…mobilization of support and enabling environments’ for mitigation (116)

57

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (finance)

Page 58: Paris outcomes 2016

• ‘Acknowledges’ Lima-Paris Action Agenda (117)• ‘Welcomes’ ‘efforts’ of NPS ‘scale up their climate actions’,

encourages registration on Non-State Actor Zone for Climate Action platform (118)

• ‘Encourages’ ‘Parties to work closely with NPS’ (119)• Encourages NPS to ‘increase their engagement’ (120)• ‘Agrees’ to hold a ‘a high-level event’ every COP 2016-2020:

– ‘strengthens high-level engagement on the implementation of policy options and actions’

– ‘ opportunity for announcing new or strengthened voluntary efforts’– ‘Takes stock of related progress’ – Provides ‘meaningful and regular…effective high-level engagement

of dignitaries of Parties, international organizations, international cooperative initiatives and NPS’ (121) 58

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (state and non-Party stakeholders [NPS] co-operation)

Page 59: Paris outcomes 2016

• ‘Decides’ to appoint 2 ‘high-level champions’ [Janos Pasztor, Laurence Tubiana] on behalf of COP President to ‘facilitate’ (122)– ‘strengthened high-level engagement’ 2016–2020 – ‘successful execution of existing efforts’ – ‘scaling-up and introduction of new…voluntary efforts, initiatives

and coalitions– By

a) Working with Executive Secretary (ES)b) Engaging with interested Parties and non-Party stakeholders c) Providing guidance to the secretariat

• ‘Decides’ Champions appointed for 2 years (123)a) COP 21 President appoints 1b) COP 22 President appoints 1c) Each President after appoints 1

• ‘Invites’ ‘support’ for work of champions (124) 59

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (state and non-Party stakeholders [NPS] co-operation)

Page 60: Paris outcomes 2016

• ‘Decides’ to launch a ‘technical examination process’ of adaptation 2016-2020 (125) to– identify ‘concrete opportunities’ for ‘strengthening resilience, reducing vulnerabilities and

increasing the understanding and implementation of adaptation actions’ (126)– ‘Organized’ by SBI/SBSTA and ‘conducted’ by Adaptation Committee (AC) (127)

• ‘Decides’ process will (128)a) Facilitate sharing of lessonsb) Identify actions to ‘enhance’ implementation actionsc) Promote co-operative actiond) Identify opportunities to ‘enhance’ adptation support

• ‘Decides’ process will ‘take into account the process, modalities, outputs, outcomes and lessons learned from the technical examination process on mitigation’ (129)

• ‘Requests’ CCS support (130)a) Organize technical expert meetingsb) Prepare technical papers

• ‘Decides’ AC to ‘engage’ with other convention bodies, programmes, institutions (131)

• ‘Decides’ to conduct an effectiveness review (132)• ‘Invites’ parties and observers to provide evidence of ‘opportunities’ (133)

60

4. Enhanced action prior to 2020 (adaptation)

Page 61: Paris outcomes 2016

5. Non-Party Stakeholders• ‘Welcomes’ the efforts of all non-Party stakeholders(NPS) to

address and respond to climate change (inc. CSOs, private sector, financial institutions, cities and other subnational authorities) (134)

• ‘Invites’ NPS to ‘scale up their efforts and support actions’ via the Non-State Actor Zone for Climate Action (135)

• (136) – ‘Recognizes’ the need to strengthen knowledge, technologies,

practices and efforts of local communities and indigenous peoples and – ‘establishes’ a knowledge sharing of best practices on mitigation and

adaptation • ‘Recognizes’ the importance of incentives including domestic

policies and carbon pricing (137) 61

Page 62: Paris outcomes 2016

7. Administrative and budgetary matters

• ‘Takes note’ of cost implications for CCS and actions undertaken are subject to financial availability (138)

• ‘Emphasizes’ the urgency of making additional resources available for the implementation of the relevant actions (139)

• ‘Urges Parties to make voluntary contributions for the timely implementation of this decision’

62

Page 63: Paris outcomes 2016

• Article 1: Definitions refer back to Convention (UNFCCC)• Article 2: Strengthen response to climate change (CC) (‘well below 2oC)• Article 3: Nationally determined contributions to reduce emissions• Article 4: Details how Parties will deliver NDCs• Article 5: Enhancing sinks and reservoirs of GHGs, ‘including forests’• Article 6: Voluntary mitigation ‘mechanisms’ to meet NDCs• Article 7: Enhancing adaptation activities• Article 8: Measures for addressing loss and damage from CC• Article 9: Provision of Finance• Article 10: Technology development and transfer• Article 11: Capacity building • Article 12: Public awareness and participation (very short)• Article 13: Transparency of action• Article 14: Global Stocktake• Article 15: Scope of mechanism for implementation and compliance• Article 16: Administrative arrangements• Article 17: Role of the Climate Change Secretariat under Agreement• Article 18 – 19: Roles of subsidiary bodies• Articles 20: Ratification arrangements• Article 21: Entry into force• Articles 22-29: other administrative arrangements 63

Summary of articles of the Agreement

Page 64: Paris outcomes 2016

1. This Agreement, in enhancing the implementation of the Convention, including its objective, aims to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change, in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty, including by:

a) Holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change;

b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production;

c) Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

2. This Agreement will be implemented to reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances. 64

Article 2: Strengthen response to climate change

Page 65: Paris outcomes 2016

• As nationally determined contributions to the global response to climate change, all Parties are to undertake and communicate ambitious efforts as defined in Articles 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13 with the view to achieving the purpose of this Agreement as set out in Article 2. The efforts of all Parties will represent a progression over time, while recognizing the need to support developing country Parties for the effective implementation of this Agreement.

65

Article 3: Nationally determined contributions to reduce emissions

Page 66: Paris outcomes 2016

1. In order to achieve the long-term temperature goal set out in Article 2, Parties aim to reach global peaking of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible, recognizing that peaking will take longer for developing country Parties, and to undertake rapid reductions thereafter in accordance with best available science, so as to achieve a balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in the second half of this century, on the basis of equity, and in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty.

2. Each Party shall prepare, communicate and maintain successive nationally determined contributions that it intends to achieve. Parties shall pursue domestic mitigation measures, with the aim of achieving the objectives of such contributions .

3. Each Party’s successive nationally determined contribution will represent a progression beyond the Party’s then current nationally determined contribution and reflect its highest possible ambition , reflecting its common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.

4. Developed country Parties should continue taking the lead by undertaking economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets. Developing country Parties should continue enhancing their mitigation efforts, and are encouraged to move over time towards economy-wide emission reduction or limitation targets in the light of different national circumstances.

5. Support shall be provided to developing country Parties for the implementation of this Article, in accordance with Articles 9, 10 and 11, recognizing that enhanced support for developing country Parties will allow for higher ambition in their actions.

6. The least developed countries and small island developing States may prepare and communicate strategies, plans and actions for low greenhouse gas emissions development reflecting their special circumstances.

7. Mitigation co-benefits resulting from Parties’ adaptation actions and/or economic diversification plans can contribute to mitigation outcomes under this Article.

8. In communicating their nationally determined contributions, all Parties shall provide the information necessary for clarity, transparency and understanding in accordance with decision 1/CP.21 and any relevant decisions of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

9. Each Party shall communicate a nationally determined contribution every five years in accordance with decision 1/CP.21 and any relevant decisions of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement and be informed by the outcomes of the global stocktake referred to in Article 14.

10. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall consider common time frames for nationally determined contributions at its first session.

66

Article 4: Details how Parties will deliver NDCs

Page 67: Paris outcomes 2016

11. A Party may at any time adjust its existing nationally determined contribution with a view to enhancing its level of ambition , in accordance with guidance adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

12. Nationally determined contributions communicated by Parties shall be recorded in a public registry maintained by the secretariat.

13. Parties shall account for their nationally determined contributions. In accounting for anthropogenic emissions and removals corresponding to their nationally determined contributions, Parties shall promote environmental integrity, transparency, accuracy, completeness, comparability and consistency, and ensure the avoidance of double counting , in accordance with guidance adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

14. In the context of their nationally determined contributions, when recognizing and implementing mitigation actions with respect to anthropogenic emissions and removals, Parties should take into account, as appropriate, existing methods and guidance under the Convention, in the light of the provisions of paragraph 13 of this Article.

15. Parties shall take into consideration in the implementation of this Agreement the concerns of Parties with economies most affected by the impacts of response measures, particularly developing country Parties.

16. Parties, including regional economic integration organizations and their member States, that have reached an agreement to act jointly under paragraph 2 of this Article shall notify the secretariat of the terms of that agreement, including the emission level allocated to each Party within the relevant time period, when they communicate their nationally determined contributions. The secretariat shall in turn inform the Parties and signatories to the Convention of the terms of that agreement.

17. Each party to such an agreement shall be responsible for its emission level as set out in the agreement referred to in paragraph 16 above in accordance with paragraphs 13 and 14 of this Article and Articles 13 and 15.

18. If Parties acting jointly do so in the framework of, and together with, a regional economic integration organization which is itself a Party to this Agreement, each member State of that regional economic integration organization individually, and together with the regional economic integration organization, shall be responsible for its emission level as set out in the agreement communicated under paragraph 16 of this Article in accordance with paragraphs 13 and 14 of this Article and Articles 13 and 15.

19. All Parties should strive to formulate and communicate long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies , mindful of Article 2 taking into account their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.

67

Article 4: Details how Parties will deliver NDCs

Page 68: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Parties should take action to conserve and enhance, as appropriate, sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases as referred to in Article 4, paragraph 1(d), of the Convention, including forests.

2. Parties are encouraged to take action to implement and support, including through results-based payments, the existing framework as set out in related guidance and decisions already agreed under the Convention for: policy approaches and positive incentives for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries; and alternative policy approaches, such as joint mitigation and adaptation approaches for the integral and sustainable management of forests, while reaffirming the importance of incentivizing, as appropriate, non-carbon benefits associated with such approaches.

68

Article 5: Enhancing sinks and reservoirs of GHGs

Page 69: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Parties recognize that some Parties choose to pursue voluntary cooperation in the implementation of their nationally determined contributions to allow for higher ambition in their mitigation and adaptation actions and to promote sustainable development and environmental integrity.

2. Parties shall, where engaging on a voluntary basis in cooperative approaches that involve the use of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes towards nationally determined contributions, promote sustainable development and ensure environmental integrity and transparency, including in governance, and shall apply robust accounting to ensure, inter alia, the avoidance of double counting, consistent with guidance adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

3. The use of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes to achieve nationally determined contributions under this Agreement shall be voluntary and authorized by participating Parties.

4. A mechanism to contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and support sustainable development is hereby established under the authority and guidance of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement for use by Parties on a voluntary basis. It shall be supervised by a body designated by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, and shall aim:

a) To promote the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions while fostering sustainable development; b) To incentivize and facilitate participation in the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by public and private

entities authorized by a Party; c) To contribute to the reduction of emission levels in the host Party, which will benefit from mitigation activities

resulting in emission reductions that can also be used by another Party to fulfil its nationally determined contribution; and

d) To deliver an overall mitigation in global emissions. 69

Article 6: Voluntary mitigation ‘mechanisms’ to meet NDCs

Page 70: Paris outcomes 2016

5. Emission reductions resulting from the mechanism referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article shall not be used to demonstrate achievement of the host Party’s nationally determined contribution if used by another Party to demonstrate achievement of its nationally determined contribution.

6. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall ensure that a share of the proceeds from activities under the mechanism referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article is used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation.

7. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall adopt rules, modalities and procedures for the mechanism referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article at its first session.

8. Parties recognize the importance of integrated, holistic and balanced non-market approaches being available to Parties to assist in the implementation of their nationally determined contributions, in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication, in a coordinated and effective manner, including through, inter alia, mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology transfer and capacity-building, as appropriate. These approaches shall aim to:

5. Promote mitigation and adaptation ambition; 6. Enhance public and private sector participation in the implementation of nationally determined contributions;

and 7. Enable opportunities for coordination across instruments and relevant institutional arrangements.

9. A framework for non-market approaches to sustainable development is hereby defined to promote the non- market approaches referred to in paragraph 8 of this Article.

70

Article 6: Voluntary mitigation ‘mechanisms’ to meet NDCs

Page 71: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Parties hereby establish the global goal on adaptation of enhancing adaptive capacity, strengthening resilience and reducing vulnerability to climate change, with a view to contributing to sustainable development and ensuring an adequate adaptation response in the context of the temperature goal referred to in Article 2.

2. Parties recognize that adaptation is a global challenge faced by all with local, subnational, national, regional and international dimensions, and that it is a key component of and makes a contribution to the long-term global response to climate change to protect people, livelihoods and ecosystems, taking into account the urgent and immediate needs of those developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.

3. The adaptation efforts of developing country Parties shall be recognized, in accordance with the modalities to be adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement at its first session.

4. Parties recognize that the current need for adaptation is significant and that greater levels of mitigation can reduce the need for additional adaptation efforts, and that greater adaptation needs can involve greater adaptation costs.

5. Parties acknowledge that adaptation action should follow a country-driven, gender-responsive, participatory and fully transparent approach, taking into consideration vulnerable groups, communities and ecosystems, and should be based on and guided by the best available science and, as appropriate, traditional knowledge, knowledge of indigenous peoples and local knowledge systems, with a view to integrating adaptation into relevant socioeconomic and environmental policies and actions, where appropriate.

6. Parties recognize the importance of support for and international cooperation on adaptation efforts and the importance of taking into account the needs of developing country Parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.

7. Parties should strengthen their cooperation on enhancing action on adaptation, taking into account the Cancun Adaptation Framework, including with regard to:

a) Sharing information, good practices, experiences and lessons learned, including, as appropriate, as these relate to science, planning, policies and implementation in relation to adaptation actions;

b) Strengthening institutional arrangements, including those under the Convention that serve this Agreement, to support the synthesis of relevant information and knowledge, and the provision of technical support and guidance to Parties;

c) Strengthening scientific knowledge on climate, including research, systematic observation of the climate system and early warning systems, in a manner that informs climate services and supports decision- making; Assisting developing country Parties in identifying effective adaptation practices, adaptation needs, priorities, support provided and received for adaptation actions and efforts, and challenges and gaps, in a manner consistent with encouraging good practices;

d) Improving the effectiveness and durability of adaptation actions.

8. United Nations specialized organizations and agencies are encouraged to support the efforts of Parties to implement the actions referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article, taking into account the provisions of paragraph 5 of this Article. 71

Article 7: Enhancing adaptation activities

Page 72: Paris outcomes 2016

9. Each Party shall, as appropriate, engage in adaptation planning processes and the implementation of actions, including the development or enhancement of relevant plans, policies and/or contributions, which may include:

a) The implementation of adaptation actions, undertakings and/or efforts; b) The process to formulate and implement national adaptation plans; c) The assessment of climate change impacts and vulnerability, with a view to formulating nationally determined prioritized actions, taking

into account vulnerable people, places and ecosystems; d) Monitoring and evaluating and learning from adaptation plans, policies, programmes and actions; and e) Building the resilience of socioeconomic and ecological systems, including through economic diversification and sustainable

management of natural resources.

10. Each Party should, as appropriate, submit and update periodically an adaptation communication, which may include its priorities, implementation and support needs, plans and actions, without creating any additional burden for developing country Parties.

11. The adaptation communication referred to in paragraph 10 of this Article shall be, as appropriate, submitted and updated periodically, as a component of or in conjunction with other communications or documents, including a national adaptation plan, a nationally determined contribution as referred to in Article 4, paragraph 2, and/or a national communication.

12. The adaptation communications referred to in paragraph 10 of this Article shall be recorded in a public registry maintained by the secretariat.

13. Continuous and enhanced international support shall be provided to developing country Parties for the implementation of paragraphs 7, 9, 10 and 11 of this Article, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 9, 10 and 11.

14. The global stocktake referred to in Article 14 shall, inter alia: a) Recognize adaptation efforts of developing country Parties; b) Enhance the implementation of adaptation action taking into account the adaptation communication referred to in

paragraph 10 of this Article; c) Review the adequacy and effectiveness of adaptation and support provided for adaptation; and d) Review the overall progress made in achieving the global goal on adaptation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. 72

Article 7: Enhancing adaptation activities

Page 73: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Parties recognize the importance of averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and slow onset events, and the role of sustainable development in reducing the risk of loss and damage.

2. The Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts shall be subject to the authority and guidance of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement and may be enhanced and strengthened, as determined by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

3. Parties should enhance understanding, action and support, including through the Warsaw International Mechanism, as appropriate, on a cooperative and facilitative basis with respect to loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change.

4. Accordingly, areas of cooperation and facilitation to enhance understanding, action and support may include:

a) Early warning systems; b) Emergency preparedness; c) Slow onset events; d) Events that may involve irreversible and permanent loss and damage; e) Comprehensive risk assessment and management; f) Risk insurance facilities, climate risk pooling and other insurance solutions; g) Non-economic losses; h) Resilience of communities, livelihoods and ecosystems.

5. The Warsaw International Mechanism shall collaborate with existing bodies and expert groups under the Agreement, as well as relevant organizations and expert bodies outside the Agreement. 73

Article 8: Measures for addressing loss and damage from CC

Page 74: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Developed country Parties shall provide financial resources to assist developing country Parties with respect to both mitigation and adaptation in continuation of their existing obligations under the Convention.

2. Other Parties are encouraged to provide or continue to provide such support voluntarily. 3. As part of a global effort, developed country Parties should continue to take the lead in mobilizing climate finance from a wide

variety of sources, instruments and channels, noting the significant role of public funds, through a variety of actions, including supporting country-driven strategies, and taking into account the needs and priorities of developing country Parties. Such mobilization of climate finance should represent a progression beyond previous efforts.

4. The provision of scaled-up financial resources should aim to achieve a balance between adaptation and mitigation, taking into account country-driven strategies, and the priorities and needs of developing country Parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change and have significant capacity constraints, such as the least developed countries and small island developing States, considering the need for public and grant-based resources for adaptation.

5. Developed country Parties shall biennially communicate indicative quantitative and qualitative information related to paragraphs 1 and 3 of this Article, as applicable, including, as available, projected levels of public financial resources to be provided to developing country Parties. Other Parties providing resources are encouraged to communicate biennially such information on a voluntary basis.

6. The global stocktake referred to in Article 14 shall take into account the relevant information provided by developed country Parties and/or Agreement bodies on efforts related to climate finance.

7. Developed country Parties shall provide transparent and consistent information on support for developing country Parties provided and mobilized through public interventions biennially in accordance with the modalities, procedures and guidelines to be adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, at its first session, as stipulated in Article 13, paragraph 13. Other Parties are encouraged to do so.

8. The Financial Mechanism of the Convention, including its operating entities, shall serve as the financial mechanism of this Agreement.

9. The institutions serving this Agreement, including the operating entities of the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, shall aim to ensure efficient access to financial resources through simplified approval procedures and enhanced readiness support for developing country Parties, in particular for the least developed countries and small island developing States, in the context of their national climate strategies and plans.

74

Article 9: Provision of Finance

Page 75: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Parties share a long-term vision on the importance of fully realizing technology development and transfer in order to improve resilience to climate change and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Parties, noting the importance of technology for the implementation of mitigation and adaptation actions under this Agreement and recognizing existing technology deployment and dissemination efforts, shall strengthen cooperative action on technology development and transfer.

3. The Technology Mechanism established under the Convention shall serve this Agreement. 4. A technology framework is hereby established to provide overarching guidance to the

work of the Technology Mechanism in promoting and facilitating enhanced action on technology development and transfer in order to support the implementation of this Agreement, in pursuit of the long-term vision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.

5. Accelerating, encouraging and enabling innovation is critical for an effective, long-term global response to climate change and promoting economic growth and sustainable development. Such effort shall be, as appropriate, supported, including by the Technology Mechanism and, through financial means, by the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, for collaborative approaches to research and development, and facilitating access to technology, in particular for early stages of the technology cycle, to developing country Parties.

6. Support, including financial support, shall be provided to developing country Parties for the implementation of this Article, including for strengthening cooperative action on technology development and transfer at different stages of the technology cycle, with a view to achieving a balance between support for mitigation and adaptation. The global stocktake referred to in Article 14 shall take into account available information on efforts related to support on technology development and transfer for developing country Parties.

75

Article 10: Technology development and transfer

Page 76: Paris outcomes 2016

1. Capacity-building under this Agreement should enhance the capacity and ability of developing country Parties, in particular countries with the least capacity, such as the least developed countries, and those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, such as small island developing States, to take effective climate change action, including, inter alia, to implement adaptation and mitigation actions, and should facilitate technology development, dissemination and deployment, access to climate finance, relevant aspects of education, training and public awareness, and the transparent, timely and accurate communication of information.

2. Capacity-building should be country-driven, based on and responsive to national needs, and foster country ownership of Parties, in particular, for developing country Parties, including at the national, subnational and local levels. Capacity-building should be guided by lessons learned, including those from capacity-building activities under the Convention, and should be an effective, iterative process that is participatory, cross-cutting and gender-responsive.

3. All Parties should cooperate to enhance the capacity of developing country Parties to implement this Agreement. Developed country Parties should enhance support for capacity-building actions in developing country Parties.

4. All Parties enhancing the capacity of developing country Parties to implement this Agreement, including through regional, bilateral and multilateral approaches, shall regularly communicate on these actions or measures on capacity-building. Developing country Parties should regularly communicate progress made on implementing capacity-building plans, policies, actions or measures to implement this Agreement.

5. Capacity-building activities shall be enhanced through appropriate institutional arrangements to support the implementation of this Agreement, including the appropriate institutional arrangements established under the Convention that serve this Agreement. Parties to the Paris Agreement shall, at its first session, consider and adopt a decision on the initial institutional arrangements The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the for capacity-building.

76

Article 11: Capacity building

Page 77: Paris outcomes 2016

Parties shall cooperate in taking measures, as appropriate, to enhance climate change education, training, public awareness, public participation and public access to information, recognizing the importance of these steps with respect to enhancing actions under this Agreement.

77

Article 12: Public awareness and participation

Page 78: Paris outcomes 2016

1. In order to build mutual trust and confidence and to promote effective implementation, an enhanced transparency framework for action and support, with built-in flexibility which takes into account Parties’ different capacities and builds upon collective experience is hereby established.

2. The transparency framework shall provide flexibility in the implementation of the provisions of this Article to those developing country Parties that need it in the light of their capacities. The modalities, procedures and guidelines referred to in paragraph 13 of this Article shall reflect such flexibility.

3. The transparency framework shall build on and enhance the transparency arrangements under the Convention, recognizing the special circumstances of the least developed countries and small island developing States, and be implemented in a facilitative, non-intrusive, non-punitive manner, respectful of national sovereignty, and avoid placing undue burden on Parties.

4. The transparency arrangements under the Convention, including national communications, biennial reports and biennial update reports, international assessment and review and international consultation and analysis, shall form part of the experience drawn upon for the development of the modalities, procedures and guidelines under paragraph 13 of this Article.

5. The purpose of the framework for transparency of action is to provide a clear understanding of climate change action in the light of the objective of the Convention as set out in its Article 2, including clarity and tracking of progress towards achieving Parties’ individual nationally determined contributions under Article 4, and Parties’ adaptation actions under Article 7, including good practices, priorities, needs and gaps, to inform the global stocktake under Article 14.

6. The purpose of the framework for transparency of support is to provide clarity on support provided and received by relevant individual Parties in the context of climate change actions under Articles 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11, and, to the extent possible, to provide a full overview of aggregate financial support provided, to inform the global stocktake under Article 14.

78

Article 13: Transparency of action

Page 79: Paris outcomes 2016

7. Each Party shall regularly provide the following information: a) A national inventory report of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals

by sinks of greenhouse gases, prepared using good practice methodologies accepted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and agreed upon by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement;

b) Information necessary to track progress made in implementing and achieving its nationally determined contribution under Article 4.

8. Each Party should also provide information related to climate change impacts and adaptation under Article 7, as appropriate.

9. Developed country Parties shall, and other Parties that provide support should, provide information on financial, technology transfer and capacity-building support provided to developing country Parties under Article 9, 10 and 11.

10. Developing country Parties should provide information on financial, technology transfer and capacity-building support needed and received under Articles 9, 10 and 11.

79

Article 13: Transparency of action

Page 80: Paris outcomes 2016

7. Information submitted by each Party under paragraphs 7 and 9 of this Article shall undergo a technical expert review, in accordance with decision 1/CP.21. For those developing country Parties that need it in the light of their capacities, the review process shall include assistance in identifying capacity-building needs. In addition, each Party shall participate in a facilitative, multilateral consideration of progress with respect to efforts under Article 9, and its respective implementation and achievement of its nationally determined contribution.

8. The technical expert review under this paragraph shall consist of a consideration of the Party’s support provided, as relevant, and its implementation and achievement of its nationally determined contribution. The review shall also identify areas of improvement for the Party, and include a review of the consistency of the information with the modalities, procedures and guidelines referred to in paragraph 13 of this Article, taking into account the flexibility accorded to the Party under paragraph 2 of this Article. The review shall pay particular attention to the respective national capabilities and circumstances of developing country Parties.

9. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall, at its first session, building on experience from the arrangements related to transparency under the Convention, and elaborating on the provisions in this Article, adopt common modalities, procedures and guidelines, as appropriate, for the transparency of action and support.

10. Support shall be provided to developing countries for the implementation of this Article. 11. Support shall also be provided for the building of transparency-related capacity of

developing country Parties on a continuous basis. 80

Article 13: Transparency of action

Page 81: Paris outcomes 2016

1. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall periodically take stock of the implementation of this Agreement to assess the collective progress towards achieving the purpose of this Agreement and its long-term goals (referred to as the “global stocktake”). It shall do so in a comprehensive and facilitative manner, considering mitigation, adaptation and the means of implementation and support, and in the light of equity and the best available science.

2. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall undertake its first global stocktake in 2023 and every five years thereafter unless otherwise decided by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

3. The outcome of the global stocktake shall inform Parties in updating and enhancing, in a nationally determined manner, their actions and support in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Agreement, as well as in enhancing international cooperation for climate action. 81

Article 14: Global Stocktake

Page 82: Paris outcomes 2016

1. A mechanism to facilitate implementation of and promote compliance with the provisions of this Agreement is hereby established.

2. The mechanism referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall consist of a committee that shall be expert-based and facilitative in nature and function in a manner that is transparent, non-adversarial and non-punitive. The committee shall pay particular attention to the respective national capabilities and circumstances of Parties.

3. The committee shall operate under the modalities and procedures adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement at its first session and report annually to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.

82

Article 15: Scope of mechanism for implementation and compliance

Page 83: Paris outcomes 2016

Article 18 1. The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice and the Subsidiary Body for

Implementation established by Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention shall serve, respectively, as the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation of this Agreement. The provisions of the Convention relating to the functioning of these two bodies shall apply mutatis mutandis to this Agreement. Sessions of the meetings of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation of this Agreement shall be held in conjunction with the meetings of, respectively, the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation of the Convention.

2. Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to this Agreement may participate as observers in the proceedings of any session of the subsidiary bodies. When the subsidiary bodies serve as the subsidiary bodies of this Agreement, decisions under this Agreement shall be taken only by those that are Parties to this Agreement.

3. When the subsidiary bodies established by Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention exercise their functions with regard to matters concerning this Agreement, any member of the bureaux of those subsidiary bodies representing a Party to the Convention but, at that time, not a Party to this Agreement, shall be replaced by an additional member to be elected by and from amongst the Parties to this Agreement.

Article 19 4. Subsidiary bodies or other institutional arrangements established by or under the Convention, other

than those referred to in this Agreement, shall serve this Agreement upon a decision of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall specify the functions to be exercised by such subsidiary bodies or arrangements.

5. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement may provide further guidance to such subsidiary bodies and institutional arrangements. 83

Article 18 – 19: Roles of subsidiary bodies

Page 84: Paris outcomes 2016

Conclusions• Well done, Paris.

– Public transport was impeccable– Civil society zone at Le Bourget commendable,

• Agreement is good, and tries to ‘troubleshoot’• ‘Shall’ provisions (esp. re INDCs and mitigation) are commendable • Greater emphasis, and certainty on adaptation, will stimulate

investmentBUT• Climate talks themselves were not transparent• Relationship between KP market mechanisms for mitigation (offsets)

e.g. CDM and Paris unclear:– Mixed signals, not good for ‘green’ growth: back to square one?

• A lot of tasks, and a lot of definitions to clear up before COP 22 – realistic?

• Still a lot of ‘may’ provisions nested inside ‘shall’ clauses: too much wiggle room?

• Too much to achieve by COP 22 – and 2020 (too ambitious an agenda?)SCORE OUT OF TEN: 7 – enough to save the planet?

84

Page 85: Paris outcomes 2016

Thank You

[email protected]

@tim_cadman