parexel_drugdevelopment_june2015

Upload: bendisdacica

Post on 01-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    1/12

    Distributed by

    THE DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    A special publication brought to you by

    The mission is to getnew and innovative

    drug treatments into

    the hands of those

    who need them most

    by simplifying the

    journey to market.

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    2/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 20152

    ver the past 20 years, advancements in our

    knowledge of the molecular and genetic basis

    of disease have led to the development of a vast ar-

    ray of scientific tools to target diseases more precisely.

    The application of these tools is resulting in a particularly

    robust pipeline, as there are more than 7,000 medicines

    in development globally, according to the Pharmaceutical

    Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

    These advancements in science, however, mean

    greater complexity for research and development. The

    R&D investment for each new medicine was estimated

    to average $1.2 billion, including the cost of failures, in

    2014, with more recent studies estimating the costs to

    be even higher, upward of $2.6 billion, according to the

    Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.

    And the development journey is long, a process of-

    ten lasting more than a decade to bring a new prescrip-

    tion medicine from new molecule to new medicine, and

    complex, with each stage from Phase I through Phase

    IV requiring specialized knowledge and best practices

    cultivated from deep experience to navigate clinical,

    regulatory, and commercialization hurdles.

    Going from a new molecular entity to a drug treat-

    ment opportunity is more than a goal for sponsors and

    CROsits a journey. Its a complex path that starts with

    evidence-based valuations to predict a drugs efficacy,regulatory acceptance, market potential, licensing impact

    and more. But when the journey is carefully mapped to

    address the best route and there are decision-support

    technologies available to clear obstacles, prospects for

    success increase greatly.

    And the stakes to achieve success are high. It is estimat-

    ed that PhRMA member companies invested $51.2 billion in

    R&D in 2014; since 2000, more than $600 billion has been

    The Journey: More than a Goal

    Copyright 2015 by PAREXEL International

    All rights reserved.

    Published in the United States by PharmaLinx LLC, Titusville, NJ.CUSTOM PUBLISHING

    invested in developing new medicines for patients. Despite

    the challenges and resources involved, pharmaceutical,

    biotechnology, and drug device companies are dedicated

    to the mission of advancing science and producing prod-

    ucts that improve and save the lives of patients.

    With so much money on the line, its no wonder

    pressures on biopharmaceutical companies continue to

    mount in the quest to bring new, innovative, and safe

    treatments to market that demonstrate value and ef-

    fectiveness amid limited global resources and higher

    levels of regulatory scrutiny. As a result, there is a need

    for a reinvention of the process and organization dy-

    namics that can breathe new vitality into commercial

    success. This reinvention entails an integrated approach

    that combines global clinical services infused with stra-

    tegic insights and enabled by technologiesall focused

    on accelerating time-to-market and maximizing the po-

    tential to unlock greater value in products. n

    TRENDS IN CLINICAL TRIALS

    PROTOCOL COMPLEXITY

    Increase in2000-2003 2008-2011 complexity

    Total procedures

    per trial protocol

    (e.g., bloodwork, routine

    exams, x-rays, etc.) 105.9 166.6 57%

    Total investigative

    site work burden

    (median units) 28.9 47.5 64%

    Total eligibility

    criteria 31 46 58%

    Clinical trial

    treatment period

    (median days)* 140 175 25%

    Number of case report

    form pages per protocol 55 171 227%

    * These numbers reflect only the treatment durationof the protocol.

    O

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    The Journey: More than a Goal................................ 2

    A Multifaceted Journey ............................................... 3

    Enhancing the Clinical Journey................................ 6

    Bridging the Journey Through Technology........ 10

    The Journey Taken Together ................................... 12

    Source: K.A. Getz, R.A. Campo, and K.I. Kaitin. Variability in

    Protocol Design Complexity by Phase and Therapeutic Area.Drug Information Journal 2011; 45(4): 413420; updated dataprovided through correspondence with Tufts Center for theStudy of Drug Development.

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    3/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    JUNE 2015 | SPECIAL PUBLICATION 3

    ecause drug development is multifaceted and

    complex, and requires the successful comple-

    tion of many endpoints along the way from planning

    through post launch, there is proven value in building

    a customized program for each molecule, biologic, or

    device for each regulatory environment led by an inte-

    grated team of experts.

    According to PhRMA, more than 7,000 medicines

    are in development globally. A 2012 analysis of the bio-

    pharmaceutical pipeline revealed 70% of medicines are

    potential first-in-class treatments.

    Drug development is complex and its costly, says Sy

    Pretorius, M.D., Chief Scientific Officer at PAREXEL. If a

    drug does not get approved, its not a $25 or a $250,000loss, it could potentially be a $2.5 billion issue. The stakes

    are incredibly high. When we work with customers, we

    leverage the knowledge, experience, and expertise gained

    from working on thousands of clinical trials over 30 years

    to help simplify this complex and costly journey.

    To improve the likelihood of success and reduce costs

    and timelines, a close collaboration between sponsors

    and CROs is needed to transform the process and un-

    lock the value in biopharma development. To make clini-

    cal development more effective, PAREXEL formulated a

    multidisciplinary and systems-oriented approach to out-

    sourced clinical development, bringing efficiencies, scal-ability, and standardization to the process.

    Our customers have told us that our ability to partner

    strategically has resulted in increased efficiencies, opti-

    mized performance, and continued innovation through-

    out the drug development cycle, Dr. Pretorius says.

    Over the last few years, we have witnessed a trans-

    formation in the way industry sponsors work with

    CROs, says Paul Evans, VP, Global Head, Feasibility

    and Enrollment Solutions at PAREXEL. This trend is in-

    creasing, not decreasing. The nature of what sponsors

    are asking CROs to do is also changing and evolving.

    There is now a genuine partnership between CROs and

    sponsors. These relationships provide both parties with

    opportunities to drive efficiencies and to simplify the

    drug development journey.

    TRENDS IN OUTSOURCING

    Many sponsors are transitioning from traditional

    project-by-project and preferred provider outsourcing

    methods to a more holistic approach.

    A Multifaceted Journey

    Drug development

    is complex and its

    costly. If a drug does

    not get approved,

    its not a $25 or a

    $250,000 loss, it

    could potentially be a

    $2.5 billion issue.

    Dr. Sy Pretorius, Chief

    Scientific Officer, PAREXEL

    Year-on-year, we see outsourcing continue to

    grow, Dr. Pretorius says. Many sponsors want to out-

    source more of their work to fewer suppliers based on a

    model that is designed to save money, reduce complex-

    ity, and limit the number of clinical suppliers needed in

    the clinical development space.

    In recent years, the strategic partnerships mod-

    el has played a pivotal role in advancing the overall

    CRO-sponsor relationship paradigm.By deploying this type of delivery model, we have

    been able to leverage the staff learning curve and realize

    other efficiencies on both the sponsor and CRO side,

    Dr. Pretorius says. Ultimately, this improves the level of

    staff engagement and overall customer satisfaction.

    These highly integrated engagements, which often

    span many years, are driven by shared objectives, mutual

    investment in aligned processes, and early involvement

    in protocol design and operational plan development.

    According to Dr. Pretorius, there is increasing inter-

    est by pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and drug device

    sponsors to outsource the development of an entire as-

    set or a complete phase of development for a compound

    with minimal touch points and oversight by sponsors.

    The earlier we are engaged in this complex journey,

    the more opportunity we have to work with sponsors to

    simplify the journey as much as possible, he says.

    This means CROs need to be aligned with sponsors in

    terms of the vision and the goals for a drug, biologic, or

    device and have built-in checkpoints to ensure the proj-

    ect proceeds according to the jointly developed plan.

    B

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    4/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 20154

    This type of engagement, which is far removed from

    the vendor-sponsor relationship of the past, requires

    mutual trust and a plan of action that is dependent upon

    the insights and knowledge of experts who can execute

    along the entire development timelineplanning, Phase

    I, Phase IIa, Phase II-III, Phase IIIb-IV, and post launch.

    Having a knowledgeable, dedicated team work with

    a sponsor throughout the entire drug development cy-

    cle drives consistency, improves quality, and minimizes

    transitions and hand-offs, Dr. Pretorius says.

    Building and getting to that trusted relationship is

    critical, says Karen Chu, Corporate VP, PAREXEL Clini-cal Research Services. Sponsors will then come to de-

    pend more and more on their CRO partner for the rela-

    tionships it has with the other stakeholders involved in

    the development process.

    Sponsors very much value the relationships CROs

    have with the sites, the hospitals, the people who will pre-

    scribe the medicines, Chu says. In the next year or two,

    sponsor companies will increasingly rely on their CRO

    partners to do monitoring as well as build relationships

    with the sites and with the investigators on their behalf.

    This trend is supported by research from partici-

    pants in the Tufts CSDD Executive Forum, which noted

    that soliciting input from clinical research sites on pro-

    tocol design, providing payments directly to study pa-

    tients, sharing their development plans, and providing

    feedback via scorecards that use quality metrics can

    help sponsors and CROs mitigate challenges.

    In addition, having a medical monitor available 24/7

    to answer questions when patients are at the site once

    a trial is running can help sponsors and CROs ensure

    strong site performance.

    Our integrated approach helps to identify where

    a sponsors greatest needs are, says Ken Faulkner,

    Corporate VP, Medical Imaging, PAREXEL Informatics.

    For example, it might be data analytics or patient re-

    cruitment. At the same time, a sponsor company may

    already have a technology or solution that it is using

    with good results that needs to be incorporated into

    the CROs toolkit.

    At PAREXEL, we have a technology division, but the

    focus should always be on the bigger picture, Faulkner

    adds. If a company is already using a best-in-class tech-

    nology solution, we will integrate it into what we do, if itserves the study, the sponsor, and patients best interests.

    INTEGRATION OF CONTRACT RESEARCH

    SERVICES

    For relationships between sponsors and CROs to be

    truly effective, CROs have to provide an integrated array

    of services. There also needs to be close-knit collaboration

    extending across investigator recruitment, feasibility, clin-

    ical monitoring, data management, biostatistical analysis,

    medical writing, and clinical logistics, among other areas.

    We think of ourselves as the guide to our clients

    journey, says Ron Kraus, Corporate VP, Worldwide Head,

    PAREXEL Consulting. When we are brought in to start

    planning, we look at the clients objective for the therapy

    and then deploy an expert, multidimensional team that in-

    cludes regulatory, scientific, and commercial disciplines.

    We can bring regulatory and scientific expertise,

    which is married with the strength of our operations. This

    allows us to generate and evaluate various scenarios for

    the broader development program as well as individual

    To serve companies

    well, CROs have

    to provide all of

    the development

    servicesintegrated

    along the timeline

    and with a high level

    of transparency.

    Dr. Joe Avellone,

    Executive VP, PAREXEL

    There is now a

    genuine partnership

    between CROs and

    sponsors. Theserelationships provide

    both parties with

    opportunities to

    drive efficiencies and

    to simplify the drug

    development journey.

    Paul Evans, VP, Global

    Head, Feasibility and

    Enrollment Solutions,

    PAREXEL

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    5/12

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    6/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 20156

    rom feasibility analysis, site selection, and patient

    recruitment to clinical monitoring, data collection,

    and management on through NDA preparation, sub-

    mission, and post-approval studies, sponsors are look-

    ing for ways to reduce costs, improve efficiencies, and

    increase the commercialization success of the drugs,

    biologics, and devices they strive to bring to market.

    Along the way, sponsors and their CRO partners

    face several challenges. One of the biggest is the need

    to drive clinical research efficiencies and process im-

    provement. Sponsors are pressured with either flat or

    reduced R&D budgets, but with the imperative to get

    more out of their pipelines.

    Historically, CROs have presented the opportunity

    for variable costs, thus eliminating the need for spon-

    sors to employ large global workforces.

    In this day and age, CROs, especially those with an

    array of integrated services, including technology solu-

    tions, can offer sponsors both large and small a number

    of opportunities to enhance their clinical development

    programs.

    Dr. Avellone notes that PAREXEL brings innovative

    thinking and technologies to the table so that sponsors

    can focus on the science or commercialization of the

    drug, biologic, or device.

    With our breadth of experience and integrated ap-

    proach, we can help sponsors be much more cost-ef-ficient, while providing the requisite expertise to bring

    new treatments to the market, Dr. Avellone says. Our

    clients tell us that there is a clear opportunity for CROs

    to play an important role in bringing new and life-sav-

    ing drugs to the market if they can simplify the journey

    of drug development and become a full development

    partner. Thats what we are committed to doing.

    Understanding the sponsors needs is imperative to

    leveraging efficiencies, which often necessitates having

    CRO staff members work exclusively for a sponsor.

    Dr. Pretorius says this type of dedicated clinical op-

    erational resource model allows the staff to become

    well-versed in the clients processes. In many instanc-

    es, this becomes a seamless integration into the clients

    own clinical operations.

    To optimize clinical operational execution, there are

    some general principles that need to be applied to en-

    sure trial efficiency. One is the need for a high level of

    discipline and rigor around not only the protocol, but

    the entire development program.

    An important service that PAREXEL provides is

    around protocol optimization. Experts in this area help

    clients to optimize their protocol designs by analyzing

    each of the elements in a protocol synopsis such as the

    primary objective(s), secondary objective(s), the de-

    sign, the sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria,the study procedures and so forth.

    Dr. Pretorius says each element is evaluated from

    several different perspectives (e.g., scientific, opera-

    tional, regulatory, ethical, etc.) to ensure everything in

    the protocol makes sense from an operational perspec-

    tive, that its practical in terms of the patient, that its

    ethical, and that it makes an important contribution to

    healthcare around the globe.

    This rigor, Dr. Pretorius says, leverages the CROs ex-

    pertise and enables its experts to generate alternative

    scenarios to the current proposed design. The impact

    that these different scenarios have on the data gath-

    ered, as well as cost and time, are quantified to assist

    clients in making informed, trade-off decisions.

    PAREXEL also assists clients in the design and exe-

    cution of adaptive trials, which are becoming increas-

    ingly more important for pharmaceutical sponsors.

    The FDA as part of its Critical Path Initiative in 2006

    identified adaptive designs as a key trend regulators

    thought could reduce costs associated with developing

    drugs. We are seeing increasing traction and demand

    Enhancing the Clinical Journey

    In five years, not only

    will there be a lot ofinvestment from East to

    West but also West to

    East. Asian companies

    may not have the

    expertise in the West,

    and they will be looking

    to CROs for their global

    development experience.

    Karen Chu, Corporate VP,

    PAREXEL Clinical Research

    Services

    F

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    7/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    JUNE 2015 | SPECIAL PUBLICATION 7

    for these services, and have invested quite heavily in

    our abilities to run adaptive trials, Dr. Pretorius says.

    In addition to the statistical component of these trials,

    specialized procedures and enabling technologies are

    critical to execute these studies successfully.

    Kraus says over the past five years or so,

    PAREXEL has gained valuable and copious insights

    from its consultations with large and small pharma

    companies, feedback that has helped shape its suite of

    offerings, ranging from planning through to commer-

    cialization.

    We are being brought in early during development

    discussions to engage with sponsors and, therefore, we

    can have clear conversations about their objectives,

    Kraus says. This approach of coming in early resonates

    favorably with clients and allows us to determine what

    evidence should be generated to satisfy the health au-

    thorities and payers. This input is used to effectively de-

    sign and develop programs that collect the right data

    through Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. As those data

    are collected, we are able to assess the data in real time

    against the pre-established plan to make sure that we

    have evidence required to successfully commercially

    launch the product.

    This is especially important in global markets where

    local issues of payer consideration and patient access

    are critical. Having data about the cost-effectiveness of

    a new product relative to the standard of care is critical,

    and this can be a hurdle in many countries.Kraus notes there are many cautionary tales that il-

    lustrate what happens when companies spend 10-plus

    years developing a product, which may receive approv-

    al in the United States but doesnt receive reimburse-

    ment approval in the EU.

    This is a critical show stopper for many companies,

    Kraus notes. We can provide a holistic view and bring

    tremendous value in terms of the ultimate goal of get-

    ting products to patients.

    One of the global markets that is growing exponen-

    tially is the Asia-Pacific pharmaceutical market, which

    is second to all of the European countries now.

    Chu says to penetrate this market efficiently for cli-

    ents, PAREXEL has created an integrated pathway in-

    clusive of regulatory strategy, operational strategy, and

    technology.

    Crucial to operating in the Asia-Pacific market is

    in-depth knowledge of the regulatory environment, as

    well as the healthcare culture. Therefore, Chu says its

    important to have operational staff members on the

    ground who understand the environment, as well as the

    operational infrastructure, including technology, and

    the power to execute studies in various local regions.

    An emerging trend Chu notes is the movement of

    Asian pharmaceutical companies looking to penetrate

    the West.

    In five years, not only will there be a lot of invest-

    ment from East to West but also West to East. Asian

    companies may not have the expertise in the West, and

    they will be looking to CROs for their global develop-

    ment experience, Chu says.

    With this cross-global movement, it will be even

    more important for CROs to be able to do business

    globally and have the services, technologies, and ex-

    pertise to facilitate clinical development for all types of

    companies.

    PHRMA MEMBER COMPANY R&D EXPENDITURES:

    1995-2013

    Expenditures (Billions of Dollars) $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60

    1995 $15.2

    1996 $16.9

    1997 $19.0

    1998 $21.0

    1999 $22.7

    2000 $26.0

    2001 $29.8

    2002 $31.0

    2003 $34.5

    2004 $37.0

    2005 $39.9

    2006 $43.4

    2007 $47.9

    2008 $47.4

    2009 $46.4

    2010 $50.7

    2011 $48.6

    2012 $49.6

    2013 $51.1

    Source: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

    PhRMA Annual Membership Survey, 19962014.

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    8/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 20158

    CROs will need very advanced global and diversi-

    fied groups of people who can work with sponsor com-

    panies, Chu says.

    SITES AND INVESTIGATORS

    Two of the key linchpins to the success of any clini-

    cal development program are sites and physician inves-

    tigators, which are facing increased demands based on

    the growing complexities of trials.

    According to Evans, the average protocol today in-

    cludes more procedures than ever before, putting in-

    creased burdens on a site, although in many cases in-

    vestigators fees have not increased.

    Most clinical sites around the world operate as

    busy clinical facilities as well as research sites. To help

    ease some of the burden on sites, PAREXEL in the

    last few years has introduced a new program, the Site

    Alliance Network. This takes a partnership approach

    to working with clinical trial sites. The company has

    a dedicated team whose job it is to work with sites.

    The company assigns a relationship manager to as-

    sist with quality processes and patient recruitment,

    as well as provide support systems for the sites. The

    alliance managers have no more than a dozen sites to

    work with so that they are able to work closely with

    those sites. This helps to ensure sites are provided

    with the right tools that will make a difference and

    help improve performance.

    Evans says the classic relationship between a spon-

    sor or CRO and sites is a build-and-break relationship

    that often precludes any long-term strategic relation-

    ship and is based on a short-term, tactical model.

    Were trying to change this paradigm by building

    long-term relationships through our Site Alliance Net-

    work, Evans says. This relationship is critically important

    because it takes a long time to get a site to that advancedlevel for sustainable and long-term clinical success.

    PAREXEL also provides sites with tools to help with

    management of the study, including a tool to screen

    the sites database for potential study subjects, a Web-

    based tool for patient consent, and a reminder app to

    keep a study protocol top of mind.

    One of the benefits of having an integrated infra-

    structure is having the technology tools to evaluate a

    sites performance based on sophisticated analytics.

    Kraus says PAREXELs analytics allow the CRO to

    maximize recruiting efforts while minimizing the num-

    ber of sites and/or countries involved.

    PATIENT RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION

    Despite the development of an impressive array of

    recruitment tactics over the last decade, the challenge

    of recruiting patients for clinical trials has continued to

    grow. The failure of these new tactics to adequately ad-

    dress the challenge has as much to do with their inher-

    ent limitations as it does with the lack of a comprehen-

    sive strategy for applying them.

    Each day a company goes beyond the planned

    deadline for a clinical trial, a sponsor company could

    lose as much as $600,000 in foregone sales of small-

    er products and as much as $8 million on blockbuster

    drugs, according to ISR Reports. This survey of mid- to

    large pharma, biotech, and medical device companies

    found that currently 28% of patients in clinical trials

    are not active patients at the site. In other words, 72%

    of current trial participants are pulled into these stud-

    ies, while 28% are pushed. Researchers suggest in the

    near term, more patients will likely be pushed into tri-

    TOP REASONS PEOPLE CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE

    IN CLINICAL TRIALS

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

    To advance medical science 33%

    To help improve the lives of others 29%

    To help improve my condition 15%To earn extra money 5%

    To receive free medical care 3%

    Source: CISCRP

    TOP WAYS THAT PEOPLE REPORT FINDING OUT

    ABOUT CLINICAL TRIALS

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

    Internet 46%

    Media (TV, radio, newspapers) 39%

    Email 32%

    Research center ads 28%

    Physician or nurse 23%

    Mail 21%

    Family/friends 13%

    Source: CISCRP

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    9/12

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    10/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 201510

    s the pharmaceutical industry strives to meet the

    ever-increasing complexity of drug development,

    new clinical trial technologies are offering tremendous

    opportunities for efficiencies, patient safety, and cost

    reductions.

    The global eClinical solutions market is forecast to

    reach $5 billion by 2018, at a CAGR of 13.5% from 2013

    to 2018, according to MarketsandMarkets. There are a

    number of factors driving the market, such as increas-

    ing pressure to reduce costs and time; rising need for

    better data standardization in terms of improving and

    maintaining the quality of clinical trial procedures to

    meet regulatory requirements; government grants and

    initiatives to support drug development; increasing

    adoption of cloud-based eClinical solutions; and signif-

    icant spending on clinical R&D by pharmaceutical and

    biopharmaceutical industries.

    eClinical technologies are increasing in sophistica-

    tion every year. At every junction of the development

    journey, technology is having an impact, from patient

    recruitment that can be accelerated by mining consum-

    er data to the integration and standardization of data

    through EMR/EHR systems.

    Big data is providing opportunities for improving

    efficiency in all aspects of clinical trials from protocol

    planning to drug innovation to development to com-

    mercialization.

    But the sheer volume of data also comes with the

    challenge of managing terabytes of information. Criti-

    cal to this process are data analytic tools and process-

    es to create meaningful insights that can lead to real

    changes in development.

    Brillio, a global technology consulting company,

    says 2015 is the year that businesses of all types will belooking for technology to assist in compiling the droves

    of data available and close the gap between data and

    actionable insight. On the way are more cloud-based

    and mobile analytics and more demand for interactive

    and responsive analytics.

    The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that apply-

    ing big data strategies to better inform decision-mak-

    ing could generate up to $100 billion in value annually

    across the U.S. healthcare system, by optimizing inno-

    vation; improving the efficiency of research and clinical

    trials; and building new tools for physicians, consumers,

    insurers, and regulators to meet the promise of more

    individualized approaches.

    Having data that are consistent, reliable, and

    well-linked is one of the biggest challenges facing

    pharmaceutical R&D. But the right analytics can

    help bring clarity to the complex drug development

    process.

    Several CROs have informatics divisions with the ex-

    pertise, processes, and technology to power clinical tri-

    als: from voice randomization systems, to medical im-

    Bridging the Journey Through Technology

    A

    Sponsors are looking

    for the people,

    the processes, the

    experience, and

    how to apply the

    technology to the

    drug development

    process.

    Ken Faulkner, Corporate

    VP, Medical Imaging,

    PAREXEL Informatics

    THE CHALLENGES OF A BIG DATATRANSFORMATION

    Organization

    Adopting a data-centric view, with a clear owner

    for each data type across functional silos and

    through the data life cycle, will greatly facilitate

    the ability to use and share data.

    Technology and analytics

    Increasing the ability to share data requires

    rationalizing and connecting legacy systems

    containing disparate data.

    Mind-sets

    Many pharmaceutical companies fear being

    the first mover, since there are few examples

    of pharmaceutical companies creating a lot of

    value from the improved use of big data.

    Source: McKinsey & Co.

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    11/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    JUNE 2015 | SPECIAL PUBLICATION 11

    aging services, to CTMS, and regulatory management

    systems.

    Faulkner says recently many sponsors have begun

    turning over their technology needs to CROs because

    the advantages involve more than just the software and

    hardware of the tools.

    Sponsors are looking for the people, the processes,

    the experience, and how to apply the technology to the

    drug development process, Faulkner says.

    PAREXEL Informatics has technological innova-

    tions that make the process faster, more precise, more

    trackable, and more productive. The CRO has integrat-

    ed platforms and applications that are specifically de-

    signed to improve how biopharma companies perform

    clinical trials, control and share data, track and report

    patient outcomes, and manage regulatory information

    worldwide.

    PAREXEL also works with data providers and exter-

    nal parties to guide clients on prescription-based data,

    data sets of current standards of care, and their use.

    We look at technology as a way to become more

    efficient and operational to simplify the sponsors jour-

    ney, Faulkner says.

    One way PAREXEL does this is through platforms

    and applications specifically designed to improve the

    performance of clinical trials. One platform is Perceptive

    MyTrials, an integrated suite of eClinical applications

    for a single point-of-access. This platform integrates

    systems for EDC, randomization and trial supply man-agement, clinical trial management, medical imaging,

    and electronic patient-reported outcomes programs to

    manage trial data more efficiently and effectively.

    PATIENTS AT THE CENTER OF THE JOURNEY

    At the heart of every trial is the patient. CROs have

    always had a close connection to patients, but as the

    overall industry undergoes a shift to patient-centricity,

    these clinical specialists can provide valuable insights

    into the patient perspective. Technology has been a key

    driver of the movement, by providing transparency into

    the trial process and more ways to communicate with

    patients and physicians. On the horizon are wearables

    and other devices that are enabling real-time collection

    of patient data in a way never seen before.

    Kalorama Information finds that the $29 billion re-

    mote patient monitoring market will grow in part be-

    cause these devices appeal to the baby boomer gen-

    eration, which will be among the largest user base.

    The retirement of baby boomers over the next decade

    will lead to the need for a widespread application of

    wireless technologies because of the greater need for

    tele-homecare, remote patient monitoring, etc.

    In fact, 22% of American adults already own a wear-

    able device and the adoption rate is quickly expected

    to rise, according to PwCs Consumer Intelligence Se-

    ries. And 53% of millennials and 54% of early adopters

    say they are excited about the future of wearable tech,

    according to the PwC survey.

    A study by PwCs Health Research Institute sug-

    gests that millennials will propel a new health economy

    to support a broader market of health and well-being.

    Globally, technology adoption has been growing in

    terms of identifying patients and hospitals, with greater

    technology use at all levels: patient, site, sponsor, and

    CRO, Chu says.

    EMR/EHR

    A recent report from Kalorama Information finds

    the market for electronic medical records and health

    records (EMR) was valued at $24.9 billion in 2014. The

    healthcare market research publisher cites government

    incentives, system upgrades, fear of penalties, and

    the quest for efficiency in healthcare organizations as

    growth factors.

    Kalorama analysts expect the market to rise to

    $35.2 billion by 2019. Their forecast assumes the trend

    of adoption will continue to move forward, althoughslowing; hospital EMR adoption will supersede doctors

    EMR adoption; and current EMR Stage 3 will move up

    in stages.

    Dr. Avellone predicts that the use of EMR in the

    United States is reaching critical mass driven by both a

    push from the federal government and by the evolution

    of integrated delivery systems around the country.

    About half of all physicians and virtually all hos-

    pitals are using some kind of electronic medical re-

    cord system, Dr. Avellone says. This creates a huge

    opportunity for drug development that wasnt there

    before.

    He says the opportunity lies in the ability to use EMR

    data as part of or as a whole data set for some studies.

    Clearly, the future of lowering the cost of drug de-

    velopment is going to be leveraging the use of elec-

    tronic medical records in the data collection and anal-

    ysis process for clinical trials, Dr. Avellone says. We

    have multiple electronic medical record partners and

    were actively exploring what type of data to collect in

    order to lower the cost of trials. n

  • 7/26/2019 PAREXEL_DrugDevelopment_June2015

    12/12

    DRUG DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY

    SPECIAL PUBLICATION | JUNE 201512

    s pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical de-

    vice industries continue to evolve to meet grow-

    ing pressures to bring life-enhancing pharmaceuticals,

    biologics, and devices to market in a timely, cost-effi-

    cient, and safe manner, sponsors will need to rely on

    the global and integrated services of world-class CROs

    that have the experts on staff to align strategic objec-

    tives as well as the technologies to maximize a prod-

    ucts potential and value.

    The first steps of any journey include choosing the

    smartest route to the destination and after all the steps

    along the wayscience, trials, and paperworkhow far

    a new drug will go depends on its use in the real world.

    For a drug to reach its intended market after launch,

    it takes ongoing data management and multi-pronged

    marketing. Safety data from larger populations expand

    trust and show regulatory compliance, while tactical

    marketing to key players builds recognition as it accel-

    erates product acceptance, formulary adoption, and

    recommendation by health professionals.

    Through an integrated suite of services and areas of

    expertiseconsulting, clinical research, and informat-icsPAREXEL can act as an astute guide to simplify

    the journey in the development of safe new products

    that can reach patients more quickly. n

    The Journey Taken Together

    CONTRIBUTING PAREXEL EXPERTS

    Joe Avellone, M.D., Executive VP,

    PAREXEL

    Karen Chu, Corporate VP, PAREXEL Clinical

    Research Services

    Paul Evans, VP, Global Head, Feasibility and

    Enrollment Solutions, PAREXEL

    Ken Faulkner, Corporate VP, Medical Imaging,

    PAREXEL Informatics

    Ron Kraus, Corporate VP, Worldwide Head,

    PAREXEL Consulting

    Sy Pretorius, M.D., Chief Scientific Officer,

    PAREXEL

    POTENTIAL FIRST-IN-CLASS MEDICINES

    IN THE PIPELINE

    An average of 70% of drugs across the pipeline are

    potential first-in-class medicines.

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

    Neurology 84%

    Cardiovascular 81%

    Cancer 80%

    Psychiatry 79%

    Immunology 72%

    Diabetes 71%

    HIV/AIDS 69%

    Infections 57%

    Source: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

    PhRMA Annual Membership Survey, 19962014.

    A

    MORE THAN 900 BIOLOGIC MEDICINES

    IN DEVELOPMENT 2013

    Biologic medicineslarge, complex molecules derived

    from living cellsfrequently represent novel strategies that

    have the potential to transform the clinical treatment of

    disease.

    Autoimmune Disorders 71

    Blood Disorders 43

    Cancers/Related Conditions 338

    Cardiovascular Disease 58

    Diabetes/Related Conditions 28

    Digestive Disorders 26

    Eye Conditions 25

    Genetic Disorders 30

    Infectious Diseases 176

    Musculoskeletal Disorders 34

    Neurologic Disorders 39

    Respiratory Disorders 38

    Skin Diseases 30

    Transplantation 13

    Other 58

    *Some medicines are being explored in more than one therapeuticcategorySource Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers ofAmerica Medicines in Development BiologicsOverviewWashington DC PhRMA